Next Article in Journal
Surging Dynamics of Glaciers in the Hunza Valley under an Equilibrium Mass State since 1990
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple Approach for Mapping Forest Cover from Time Series of Satellite Data
Open AccessArticle

Comparing Sentinel-1 and -2 Data and Indices for Agricultural Land Use Monitoring

1
Institute of Rural Studies, Thuenen Institute, 38116 Brunswick, Germany
2
Geoinformation in Environmental Planning Lab, TU Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
3
Institute of Farm Economics, Thuenen Institute, 38116 Brunswick, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(18), 2919; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12182919
Received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 25 August 2020 / Accepted: 1 September 2020 / Published: 9 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
Agricultural vegetation development and harvest date monitoring over large areas requires frequent remote sensing observations. In regions with persistent cloud coverage during the vegetation season this is only feasible with active systems, such as SAR, and is limited for optical data. To date, optical remote sensing vegetation indices are more frequently used to monitor agricultural vegetation status because they are easily processed, and the characteristics are widely known. This study evaluated the correlations of three Sentinel-2 optical indices with Sentinel-1 SAR indices over agricultural areas to gain knowledge about their relationship. We compared Sentinel-2 Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, Normalized Difference Water Index, and Plant Senescence Radiation Index with Sentinel-1 SAR VV and VH backscatter, VH/VV ratio, and Sentinel-1 Radar Vegetation Index. The study was conducted on 22 test sites covering approximately 35,000 ha of four different main European agricultural land use types, namely grassland, maize, spring barley, and winter wheat, in Lower Saxony, Germany, in 2018. We investigated the relationship between Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 indices for each land use type considering three phenophases (growing, green, senescence). The strength of the correlations of optical and SAR indices differed among land use type and phenophase. There was no generic correlation between optical and SAR indices in our study. However, when the data were split by land use types and phenophases, the correlations increased remarkably. Overall, the highest correlations were found for the Radar Vegetation Index and VH backscatter. Correlations for grassland were lower than for the other land use types. Adding auxiliary data to a multiple linear regression analysis revealed that, in addition to land use type and phenophase information, the lower quartile and median SAR values per field, and a spatial variable, improved the models. Other auxiliary data retrieved from a digital elevation model, Sentinel-1 orbit direction, soil type information, and other SAR values had minor impacts on the model performance. In conclusion, despite the different nature of the signal generation, there were distinct relationships between optical and SAR indices which were independent of environmental variables but could be stratified by land use type and phenophase. These relationships showed similar patterns across different test sites. However, a regional clustering of landscapes would significantly improve the relationships. View Full-Text
Keywords: SAR remote sensing; optical remote sensing; Lower Saxony; phenological development; vegetation indices; agriculture SAR remote sensing; optical remote sensing; Lower Saxony; phenological development; vegetation indices; agriculture
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Holtgrave, A.-K.; Röder, N.; Ackermann, A.; Erasmi, S.; Kleinschmit, B. Comparing Sentinel-1 and -2 Data and Indices for Agricultural Land Use Monitoring. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2919.

AMA Style

Holtgrave A-K, Röder N, Ackermann A, Erasmi S, Kleinschmit B. Comparing Sentinel-1 and -2 Data and Indices for Agricultural Land Use Monitoring. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(18):2919.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Holtgrave, Ann-Kathrin; Röder, Norbert; Ackermann, Andrea; Erasmi, Stefan; Kleinschmit, Birgit. 2020. "Comparing Sentinel-1 and -2 Data and Indices for Agricultural Land Use Monitoring" Remote Sens. 12, no. 18: 2919.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop