Next Article in Journal
Land Cover Classification in Mangrove Ecosystems Based on VHR Satellite Data and Machine Learning—An Upscaling Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Validation of Sentinel-3A Based Lake Level over US and Canada
Previous Article in Journal
A Method to Automatically Detect Changes in Multitemporal Spectral Indices: Application to Natural Disaster Damage Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping Sea Surface Height Using New Concepts of Kinematic GNSS Instruments
Open AccessArticle

An Investigation of the Influences of SWOT Sampling and Errors on Ocean Eddy Observation

College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, No. 238 Songling Road, Qingdao 266100, China
Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, No. 1 Wenhai Road, Qingdao 266200, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(17), 2682;
Received: 12 June 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 18 August 2020 / Published: 19 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Calibration and Validation of Satellite Altimetry)
The mission of Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) is scheduled to be launched in 2022, and global ocean eddies with radius scales of larger than 10 km are expected to be observed from space. However, there are still open questions about the capability of SWOT to detect ocean eddies. Based on ocean model data and SWOT orbit, this study simulates along-track observation of SWOT. Two eddy datasets are derived from simulated observation data via mapping and eddy identification procedures, one of which includes SWOT errors and the other does not. The third eddy dataset is generated from the original model data. Through comparing these three eddy datasets, it is found that 34% (40%) eddies are lost due to insufficient temporal sampling and errors in the Kuroshio Extension (South China Sea) region, and numerous artifact eddies are generated. To further explain the influence of SWOT errors on smaller-scale eddies, two eddies (a cyclonic eddy and an anticyclonic eddy) with the radius of about 10 km are repeatedly observed 100 times using the SWOT-simulator. The cyclonic eddy with larger amplitude has been detected 84 times, while the anticyclonic eddy is visible 76 times. Therefore, the influence of the SWOT sampling and errors on ocean eddy observation is revealed by the results of these observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs). View Full-Text
Keywords: SWOT; space-time sampling; errors; ocean eddies SWOT; space-time sampling; errors; ocean eddies
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, C.; Guo, X.; Zhang, H.; Di, J.; Chen, G. An Investigation of the Influences of SWOT Sampling and Errors on Ocean Eddy Observation. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2682.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop