# Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Changes of Ice Sheet Mass and Driving Factors in Greenland

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

^{2}from 2003 to 2015. This mass loss was relatively stable in the two years after 2012, and then continued a decreasing trend; (2) in terms of space, the mass loss areas of the Greenland ice sheet mainly concentrates in the southeastern, southwestern, and northwestern regions, and the southeastern region mass losses have a maximum rate of more than 27 cm/yr (equivalent water height), while the northeastern region show a minimum rate of less than 3 cm/yr, showing significant changes as a whole. In addition, using spatial distribution and the time coefficients of the first two models obtained by EOF decomposition, ice sheet quality in the southeastern and northwestern regions of Greenland show different significant changes in different periods from 2003 to 2015, while the other regions showed relatively stable changes; (3) in terms of driving factors temperature, there is an anti-phase relationship between ice sheet mass change and land surface temperature by the mean XWT-based semblance value of −0.34 in a significant oscillation period variation of 12 months. Meanwhile, XWT-based semblance values have the largest relative change in 2005 and 2012, and the smallest relative change in 2009 and 2010, indicating that the influence of land surface temperature on ice sheet mass significantly varies in different years.

## 1. Introduction

^{3}/a, and an acceleration of −30 ± 11 Gt/yr

^{2}; Ramilli et al. [29] estimated that the melting rate of the Greenland ice sheet was −109 ± 9 Gt/a from 2002 to 2005; Slobbe et al. [30] used GRACE post-processing data to compare Greenland ice sheet mass changes from four different organizations. The results indicated that the different data sources caused different results; Baur et al. [31] explored the annual average Greenland ice sheet melting with a rate of 162 ± 11 km

^{3}/a through GRACE RL04 data during 2002–2008; Joodaki et al. [32] found that the mass of the Greenland ice sheet melted at the rate of −166 ± 20 Gt/a and the acceleration of melting was −32 ± 6 Gt/a by GRACE RL04 data from 2002 to 2011; Lu Fei et al. [33] found that the melting speed and acceleration of the ice sheet were −157.8 ± 11.3 Gt/a and −17.7 ± 4.5 Gt/a

^{2}, respectively, through GRACE RL05 data from 2003 to 2012. In addition, the melting rate significantly increased after 2010, from −132.2 Gt/a in 2003–2009 to −252.5 Gt/a in 2010–2012; Forsberg et al. [34] concluded that the mass change rate of the Greenland ice sheet was 265 ± 25 Gt/a, and the correlation coefficient was 0.72 with the global mean sea level change. In addition, some scholars studied ice sheet mass trends in different regions of Greenland. Chen et al. [35,36] reported that the mass change rate of Greenland ice sheet was −239 ± 23 km

^{3}/yr from April 2002 to November 2005. In addition, its decrease rate increased in the northwest and tended to be balanced in the southeast between 2007 and 2009; Wouter et al. [37] found that the overall mass change rate of the Greenland ice sheet was −179 ± 25 km3/yr on a smaller scale from February 2003 to January 2008 and the greatest mass loss occurred in the southeastern coast (279 Gt) and the northwest coast (328 Gt) in the summer of 2005 and 2007; Zhu Chuandong et al. [38] found that the annual total melting amount of the Greenland ice sheet was 188 ± 10 km

^{3}/a during 2002–2011, and the melting area mainly concentrated in the southeast and northwest of the ice sheet; Shamshiri et al. [39] used GRACE RL05 data to conclude that the peak loss of ice mass was −15 cm/yr in the southeast and northwest of Greenland, and loss acceleration was −2.5 cm/yr

^{2}in the southwest during 2003–2014.

## 2. Study Area and Data

#### 2.1. Study Area

^{2}(836,330 sq mi). Among them, the Greenland ice sheet has a volume of about 2,850,000 km

^{3}(680,000 cu mi) and covers 1,755,637 km

^{2}(677,855 sq mi) (81%) [41].

#### 2.2. GRACE Data

^{3}), latitudes, longitudes, love numbers of degree l with ${l}_{\mathrm{max}}$ = 60 [44,45], and coefficients changes of the normalized complex spherical harmonic (Stokes’ coefficients), respectively. Meanwhile, ${\tilde{P}}_{lm}(\mathrm{sin}(\theta ))$ is the fully normalized Legendre function of degree l and order m.

^{3}kg/m

^{3}). The ice sheet mass variation $\Delta m$ of Greenland can thus be given as [4]

#### 2.3. Land Surface Temperature data

## 3. Methods

#### 3.1. Theil–Sen Median Trend Analysis

#### 3.2. Mann–Kendall (MK) Trend Test

_{j}and x

_{i}are values at jth and ith points, and sign is a sign function. Then, the M–K statistic, Z, is calculated as

#### 3.3. Rotated EOF Method

**C**of time series is obtained and orthogonally decomposed as

**EOF**value can then be obtained by normalizing the decomposition. In addition, the principal component

**Z**can be calculated in the time series.

#### 3.4. Continuous and Cross Wavelet Transform

_{n}, n = 1, 2, ⋯, N) is [59]

_{n}and Y

_{n}is given as [60,61,62]

^{Y*}denotes a complex conjugation of W

^{Y}. The cross wavelet power spectrum is defined as

**|**W

^{XY}

**|**, and the complex argument of W

^{XY}can be seen as the local relative phase between X

_{n}and Y

_{n}in time–frequency domain. While the larger the

**|**W

^{XY}

**|**value, indicating that X

_{n}and Y

_{n}have a common high-energy region, which significantly correlates them with each other. More details about Cross Wavelet Power Spectrum test and phase difference calculation are given by Grinsted et al. [59] and are not repeated here.

_{i}, i = 1, 2, …, N) is defined as

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Time Variation Analysis

#### 4.1.1. Time Series and Change Trends

^{2}in 2003–2015, as was done in most previous studies. We use a quadratic form to obtain a trend of −195 ± 21 Gt/yr for the Greenland ice sheet between 2003 and 2015. The uncertainties of the data results (±12, ±2, and ±21) include contributions from the gravity field error, signal leakage effects, truncation error, GIA correction, and the statistical uncertainty of the fit. Mass loss increases with time in a relatively consistent pattern from 2003 to 2012, and a sudden decline in the time series could be observed in 2012. This was followed by a relatively stable mass loss in the next two years after 2012, and then continued in a decreasing trend. The above results are basically consistent with those obtained by researchers using GRACE data in recent years [27,28,33,36,39,64]. However, the time series of the results of this study are longer than those of previous studies, especially the trend of change in 2015 relative to 2014, and their different values are due to different data sources, time series, and post-processing methods.

#### 4.1.2. Monthly Mean and Seasonal Change

#### 4.2. Spatial Change Analysis

#### 4.3. EOF Analysis

#### 4.4. Relationship between Temperature and Ice Sheet Mass

#### 4.4.1. Spatiotemporal Contrastive Analysis

#### 4.4.2. Wavelet Transform Analysis

## 5. Conclusions

^{2}, which was relatively stable for the two years after 2012, and then continues to show a downward trend. However, in terms of monthly and seasonal variations, the change of ice sheet mass in the whole study area slowly increases between October and April, but decreases between May and September.

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Yang, Y.D.; E, D.C.; Chao, D.B. The Inversion of Ice Mass Change in Greenland Ice Sheet Using GRACE Data. Geomat. Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ.
**2009**, 34, 961–964. [Google Scholar] - Shepherd, A.; Ivins, E.R.; Geruo, A.; Barletta, V.R.; Bentley, M.J.; Bettadpur, S.; Briggs, K.H.; Bromwich, D.H.; Forsberg, R.; Galin, N.; et al. A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance. Science
**2012**, 338, 1183–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Khan, S.A.; Aschwanden, A.; Bjørk, A.A.; Wahr, J.; Kjeldsen, K.K.; Kjær, K.H. Greenland ice sheet mass balance: A review. Rep. Prog. Phys.
**2015**, 78, 046801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wahr, J.; Molenaar, M.; Bryan, F. Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**1998**, 103, 30205–30229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Swenson, S.; Wahr, J. Methods of inferring regional surface mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time-variable gravity. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**2002**, 107, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tapley, B.D. GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System. Science
**2004**, 305, 503–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Chao, B.F. On inversion for mass distribution from global (time-variable) gravity field. J. Geodyn.
**2005**, 39, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Wahr, J.M. Time Variable Gravity from Satellites. In Treatise on Geophysics; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 213–237. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, S.V.; Zaitchik, B.F.; Peters-Lidard, C.D.; Rodell, M.; Reichle, R.; Li, B.; Jasinski, M.; Mocko, D.; Getirana, A.; De Lannoy, G.; et al. Assimilation of gridded GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates in the North American Land Data Assimilation System. J. Hydrometeorol.
**2016**, 17, 1951–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhou, H.; Luo, Z.; Tangdamrongsub, N.; Wang, L.; He, L.; Xu, C.; Li, Q. Characterizing drought and flood events over the Yangtze River Basin using the HUST-Grace2016 solution and ancillary data. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nie, N.; Zhang, W.; Chen, H.; Guo, H. A Global Hydrological Drought Index Dataset Based on Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Data. Water Resour. Manag.
**2017**, 32, 1275–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sun, Z.; Zhu, X.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X. Drought evaluation using the GRACE terrestrial water storage deficit over the Yangtze River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ.
**2018**, 634, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, K.; Awange, J.L.; Forootan, E.; Goncalves, R.M.; Fleming, K. Hydrogeological characterisation of groundwater over Brazil using remotely sensed and model products. Sci. Total Environ.
**2017**, 599–600, 372–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhong, Y.; Zhong, M.; Feng, W.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, Y.; Wu, D. Groundwater Depletion in the West Liaohe River Basin, China and Its Implications Revealed by GRACE and In Situ Measurements. Remote Sens.
**2018**, 10, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Feng, W.; Shum, C.; Zhong, M.; Pan, Y. Groundwater Storage Changes in China from Satellite Gravity: An Overview. Remote Sens.
**2018**, 10, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Long, D.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Y.; Hou, X.; Hong, Y.; Scanlon, B.R.; Longuevergne, L. Global analysis of spatiotemporal variability in merged total water storage changes using multiple GRACE products and global hydrological models. Remote Sens. Environ.
**2017**, 192, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Khaki, M.; Forootan, E.; Kuhn, M.; Awange, J.; van Dijk, A.I.J.M.; Schumacher, M.; Sharifi, M.A. Determining water storage depletion within Iran by assimilating GRACE data into the W3RA hydrological model. Adv. Water Resour.
**2018**, 114, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Flechtner, F. Improved modeling of snow and glacier melting by a progressive two-stage calibration strategy with GRACE and multisource data: How snow and glacier meltwater contributes to the runoff of the Upper Brahmaputra River basin? Water Resour. Res.
**2017**, 53, 2431–2466. [Google Scholar] - Ran, J.; Ditmar, P.; Klees, R.; Farahani, H.H. Statistically optimal estimation of Greenland Ice Sheet mass variations from GRACE monthly solutions using an improved mascon approach. J. Geod.
**2018**, 92, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Murray, T. Climate change: Greenland’s ice on the scales. Nature
**2006**, 443, 277–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, Q.; Dixon, T.H.; Myers, P.G.; Bonin, J.; Chambers, D.; van den Broeke, M.R. Recent increases in Arctic freshwater flux affects Labrador Sea convection and Atlantic overturning circulation. Nat. Commun.
**2016**, 7, 10525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Alexander, P.M.; Tedesco, M.; Schlegel, N.J.; Luthcke, S.B.; Fettweis, X.; Larour, E. Greenland Ice Sheet seasonal and spatial mass variability from model simulations and GRACE (2003–2012). Cryosphere
**2016**, 10, 1259–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Schlegel, N.J.; Wiese, D.N.; Larour, E.Y.; Watkins, M.M.; Box, J.E.; Fettweis, X.; van den Broeke, M.R. Application of GRACE to the assessment of model-based estimates of monthly Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance (2003–2012). Cryosphere
**2016**, 10, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, Z.; Schrama, E.J.O.; van der Wal, W.; van den Broeke, M.; Enderlin, E.M. Improved GRACE regional mass balance estimates of the Greenland ice sheet cross-validated with the input-output method. Cryosphere
**2016**, 10, 895–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Flowers, G.E. Hydrology and the future of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Nat. Commun.
**2018**, 9, 2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Velicogna, I.; Wahr, J. Acceleration of Greenland ice mass loss in spring 2004. Nature
**2006**, 443, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Velicogna, I. Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2009**, 36, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Velicogna, I.; Sutterley, T.C.; van den Broeke, M.R. Regional acceleration in ice mass loss from Greenland and Antarctica using GRACE time-variable gravity data. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2014**, 41, 8130–8137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Ramillien, G.; Lombard, A.; Cazenave, A.; Ivins, E.R.; Llubes, M.; Remy, F.; Biancale, R. Interannual variations of the mass balance of the Antarctica and Greenland ice sheets from GRACE. Glob. Planet Chang.
**2006**, 53, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Slobbe, D.C.; Ditmar, P.G.; Lindenbergh, R.C. Estimating the rates of mass change, ice volume change and snow volume change in Greenland from ICESat and GRACE data. Geophys. J. Int.
**2010**, 176, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Baur, O.; Kuhn, M.; Featherstone, W.E. GRACE-derived ice-mass variations over Greenland by accounting for leakage effects. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**2009**, 114, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Joodaki, G.; Nahavandchi, H. Mass balance and mass loss acceleration of the Greenland ice sheet (2002–2011) from GRACE gravity data. J. Geod. Sci.
**2012**, 2, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lu, F.; You, W.; Fan, D.M. Analysis of Greenland Ice Mass Change Based on GRACE. J. Geod. Geodyn.
**2015**, 33, 27–30. [Google Scholar] - Forsberg, R.; Sørensen, L.; Simonsen, S. Greenland and Antarctica Ice Sheet Mass Changes and Effects on Global Sea Level. Surv. Geophys.
**2017**, 38, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Chen, J.L.; Wilson, C.R.; Tapley, B.D. Satellite gravity measurements confirm accelerated melting of Greenland ice sheet. Science
**2006**, 313, 1958–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, J.L.; Wilson, C.R.; Tapley, B.D. Interannual variability of Greenland ice losses from satellite gravimetry. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**2011**, 116, B07406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wouters, B.; Chambers, D.; Schrama, E.J.O. GRACE observes small-scale mass loss in Greenland. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2008**, 35, 295–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhu, C.D.; Lu, Y.; Shi, H.L.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Du, Z.L.; Tu, Y.; Gao, C.C. Quality Changes of the Greenland Ice Sheet Based on GRACE Satellite Data. Hydrogr. Surv. Chart.
**2013**, 33, 27–30. [Google Scholar] - Shamshiri, R.; Nahavandchi, H.; Joodaki, G. Seasonal variation analysis of Greenland ice mass time-series. Acta Geod. Geophys.
**2017**, 53, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Goldhar, C.; Ford, J.D. Climate Change Vulnerability and Food Security in Qeqertarsuaq, Greenland. In Community Adaptation and Vulnerability in Arctic Regions; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 263–283. [Google Scholar]
- Bamber, J.L.; Ekholm, S.; Krabill, W.B. A new, high-resolution digital elevation model of Greenland fully validated with airborne laser altimeter data. J. Geophys. Res. B Solid Earth
**2001**, 106, 6733–6745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Save, H.; The CSR Level-2 Team. GRACE RL06 Reprocessing and Results from CSR, EGU2018-10697, EGU General Assembly 2012. Available online: https://bit.ly/2Koa1aK (accessed on 3 November 2018).
- Göttl, F.; Schmidt, M.; Seitz, F. Mass-related excitation of polar motion: An assessment of the new RL06 GRACE gravity field models. Earth Planets Space
**2018**, 70, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chao, B.F. The geoid and earth rotation. In Geophysical Interpretations of Geoid; Vanicek, P., Christou, N., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Farrell, W.E. Deformation of the Earth by surface loads. Rev. Geophys.
**1972**, 10, 761–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, J.L.; Rodell, M.; Wilson, C.R.; Famiglietti, J.S. Low degree spherical harmonic influences on Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) water storage estimates. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2005**, 32, L14405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Swenson, S.; Chambers, D.; Wahr, J. Estimating geocenter variations from a combination of GRACE and ocean model output. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth
**2008**, 113, B08410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Geruo, A.; Wahr, J.; Zhong, S. Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: An application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada. Geophys. J. Int.
**2013**, 192, 557–572. [Google Scholar] - Swenson, S.; Wahr, J. Post-processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data. Geophys. Res. Lett.
**2006**, 33, L08402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, J.L.; Wilson, C.R.; Blankenship, D.; Tapley, B.D. Accelerated Antarctic ice loss from satellite gravity measurements. Nat. Geosci.
**2009**, 2, 859–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Han, S.-C.; Shum, C.K.; Jekeli, C.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Wilson, C.; Seo, K.-W. Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement. Geophys. J. Int.
**2010**, 163, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fan, Y.; van den Dool, H. A global monthly land surface air temperature analysis for 1948–present. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.
**2008**, 113, D01103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hirsch, R.M.; Slack, J.R. Non-parametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence. Water Resour. Res.
**1984**, 20, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jain, S.K.; Kumar, V.; Saharia, M. Analysis of rainfall and temperature trends in northeast India. Int. J. Climatol.
**2013**, 33, 968–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yuan, L.H.; Jiang, W.G.; Shen, W.M.; Liu, Y.H.; Wang, W.J.; Tao, L.L.; Zheng, H.; Liu, X.F. The spatio-temporal variations of vegetation cover in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2010. Acta Ecol. Sin.
**2013**, 33, 7798–7806. [Google Scholar] - Liu, Z.F.; Wang, Y.C.; Yao, Z.J.; Kang, H.M. Trend and periodicity of precipitation, air temperature and runoff in the Taihu Lake Basin. J. Nat. Resour.
**2011**, 26, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] - Yue, S.; Hashino, M. Temperature Trends in Japan: 1900–1990. Theor. Appl. Climatol.
**2003**, 75, 15–27. [Google Scholar] - Yang, P.; Xia, J.; Zhan, C.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, Y. Monitoring the spatio-temporal changes of terrestrial water storage using GRACE data in the Tarim River basin between 2002 and 2015. Sci. Total Environ.
**2017**, 595, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grinsted, A.; Moore, J.C.; Jevrejeva, S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Process. Geophys.
**2004**, 11, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Jevrejeva, S.; Moore, J.C.; Grinsted, A. Influence of the Arctic Oscillation and El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in the Baltic Sea: The wavelet approach. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.
**2003**, 108, D214677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, C. Investigating Mass Loading Contributors of Seasonal Oscillations in GPS Observations Using Wavelet Analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys.
**2016**, 173, 2767–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guo, J.; Li, W.; Yu, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, C.; Kong, Q. Impending ionospheric anomaly preceding the Iquique Mw8.2 earthquake in Chile on 2014 April 1. Geophys. J. Int.
**2015**, 203, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cooper, G.R.J.; Cowan, D.R. Comparing time series using wavelet-based semblance analysis. Comput. Geosci.
**2008**, 34, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gardner, A.S.; Moholdt, G.; Cogley, J.G.; Wouters, B.; Arendt, A.A.; Wahr, J.; Berthier, E.; Hock, R.; Pfeffer, W.T.; Kaser, G.; et al. A Reconciled Estimate of Glacier Contributions to Sea Level Rise: 2003 to 2009. Science
**2013**, 340, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Johnson, R.A.; Wichern, D.W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; Englewood, IL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Broeke, M.; Bamber, J.; Ettema, J.; Rignot, E.; Schrama, E.; van de Berg, W.J.; van Meijgaard, E.; Velicogna, I.; Wouters, B. Partitioning recent Greenland mass loss. Science
**2009**, 326, 984–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tomás, R.; Li, Z.; Lopez-Sanchez, J.M.; Liu, P.; Singleton, A. Using wavelet tools to analyse seasonal variations from InSAR time-series data: A case study of the Huangtupo landslide. Landslides
**2015**, 13, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - National Oceanography Center N. Crosswavelet and Wavelet Coherence. Available online: http://noc.ac.uk/usingscience/crosswavelet-wavelet-coherence (accessed on 28 November 2018).

**Figure 2.**Monthly mass change of Greenland from January 2003 to December 2015 estimated based on the GRACE solution of the CSR processing center. The blue line, green line and red curve represent the mass change of the time series, and the best fitting of linear and quadratic trend, respectively.

**Figure 3.**(

**a**) and (

**b**) represented monthly and seasonal changes in the mass of the Greenland ice sheet from January 2003 to December 2015, respectively.

**Figure 4.**Spatial distribution of annual change trend of GRACE ice sheet mass in Greenland from 2003 to 2015. Note: Lattice point representation has passed the M–K test of 95% confidence interval.

**Figure 5.**Spatial distribution (

**a**,

**b**) and time coefficient (

**c**,

**d**) change of the first and second EOF modes. Note: The time coefficients and EOF variables in the figure indicate relative size and are dimensionless.

**Figure 6.**Annual changes of GRACE ice sheet mass and land surface temperature in Greenland from 2003 to 2015.

**Figure 7.**Spatial distribution of annual change trend of GHCN CAMS land surface temperature in Greenland from 2003 to 2015. Note: Lattice point representation passed the M–K test of 95% confidence interval.

**Figure 8.**Continuous wavelet transform with average mass and land surface temperature represented by (

**a**) and (

**b**) from 2003 to 2015.

**Figure 9.**Cross wavelet transform of ice sheet mass and land surface temperature fluctuations. Arrows indicate relative phase relations, where straight-up arrows represent ice sheet changes, and land surface temperature shows an anti-phase relationship.

**Figure 10.**XWT-based semblance value is the closest to one cpy outside the COI. Red dashed lines represent the COI, which limits the region not affected by edge effects.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Bian, Y.; Yue, J.; Gao, W.; Li, Z.; Lu, D.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, J.
Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Changes of Ice Sheet Mass and Driving Factors in Greenland. *Remote Sens.* **2019**, *11*, 862.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070862

**AMA Style**

Bian Y, Yue J, Gao W, Li Z, Lu D, Xiang Y, Chen J.
Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Changes of Ice Sheet Mass and Driving Factors in Greenland. *Remote Sensing*. 2019; 11(7):862.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070862

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Bian, Yankai, Jianping Yue, Wei Gao, Zhen Li, Dekai Lu, Yunfei Xiang, and Jian Chen.
2019. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Changes of Ice Sheet Mass and Driving Factors in Greenland" *Remote Sensing* 11, no. 7: 862.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070862