Next Article in Journal
Multispectral Transforms Using Convolution Neural Networks for Remote Sensing Multispectral Image Compression
Next Article in Special Issue
Predicting Forest Inventory Attributes Using Airborne Laser Scanning, Aerial Imagery, and Harvester Data
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Crop Water Stress Index by Infrared Thermometry in Grapefruit Trees Irrigated with Saline Reclaimed Water Combined with Deficit Irrigation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Classification of Land Cover, Forest, and Tree Species Classes with ZiYuan-3 Multispectral and Stereo Data

UAV-Based Photogrammetric Tree Height Measurement for Intensive Forest Monitoring

Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, Alfred-Möller-Str. 1, Haus 41/42, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
Faculty of Forest and Environment, Eberswalde University of Sustainable Development, Alfred-Möller-Str. 1, Haus 11, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
Department of Geography, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 166, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(7), 758;
Received: 28 February 2019 / Revised: 25 March 2019 / Accepted: 25 March 2019 / Published: 28 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Techniques for Precision Forestry)
The measurement of tree height has long been an important tree attribute for the purpose of calculating tree growth, volume, and biomass, which in turn deliver important ecological and economical information to decision makers. Tree height has traditionally been measured by indirect field-based techniques, however these methods are rarely contested. With recent advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) remote sensing technologies, the possibility to acquire accurate tree heights semi-automatically has become a reality. In this study, photogrammetric and field-based tree height measurements of a Scots Pine stand were validated using destructive methods. The intensive forest monitoring site implemented for the study was configured with permanent ground control points (GCPs) measured with a Total Station (TS). Field-based tree height measurements resulted in a similar level of error to that of the photogrammetric measurements, with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.304 m (1.82%) and 0.34 m (2.07%), respectively (n = 34). A conflicting bias was, however, discovered where field measurements tended to overestimate tree heights and photogrammetric measurements were underestimated. The photogrammetric tree height measurements of all trees (n = 285) were validated against the field-based measurements and resulted in a RMSE of 0.479 m (2.78%). Additionally, two separate photogrammetric tree height datasets were compared (n = 251), and a very low amount of error was observed with a RMSE of 0.138 m (0.79%), suggesting a high potential for repeatability. This study shows that UAV photogrammetric tree height measurements are a viable option for intensive forest monitoring plots and that the possibility to acquire within-season tree growth measurements merits further study. Additionally, it was shown that negative and positive biases evident in field-based and UAV-based photogrammetric tree height measurements could potentially lead to misinterpretation of results when field-based measurements are used as validation. View Full-Text
Keywords: tree height; UAV; intensive forest monitoring; photogrammetry; precision forestry tree height; UAV; intensive forest monitoring; photogrammetry; precision forestry
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Krause, S.; Sanders, T.G.M.; Mund, J.-P.; Greve, K. UAV-Based Photogrammetric Tree Height Measurement for Intensive Forest Monitoring. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 758.

AMA Style

Krause S, Sanders TGM, Mund J-P, Greve K. UAV-Based Photogrammetric Tree Height Measurement for Intensive Forest Monitoring. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11(7):758.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krause, Stuart, Tanja G.M. Sanders, Jan-Peter Mund, and Klaus Greve. 2019. "UAV-Based Photogrammetric Tree Height Measurement for Intensive Forest Monitoring" Remote Sensing 11, no. 7: 758.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop