Next Article in Journal
A Flexible Architecture for Extracting Metro Tunnel Cross Sections from Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds
Previous Article in Journal
Uncertainties in the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) Remote Sensing Reflectance for Assessing Diurnal Variability of Biogeochemical Processes
Open AccessArticle

A Comparison of the Signal from Diverse Optical Sensors for Monitoring Alpine Grassland Dynamics

1
Institute for Earth Observation, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
2
Faculty for Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
3
Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
4
German Remote Sensing Data Centre (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Weßling, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(3), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030296
Received: 12 December 2018 / Revised: 18 January 2019 / Accepted: 24 January 2019 / Published: 1 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
Grasslands cover up to 40% of the mountain areas globally and 23% of the European Alps and affect numerous key ecological processes. An increasing number of optical sensors offer a great opportunity to monitor and address dynamic changes in the growth and status of grassland vegetation due to climatic and anthropogenic influences. Vegetation indices (VI) calculated from optical sensor data are a powerful tool in analyzing vegetation dynamics. However, different sensors have their own characteristics, advantages, and challenges in monitoring vegetation over space and time that require special attention when compared to or combined with each other. We used the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from handheld spectrometers, station-based Spectral Reflectance Sensors (SRS), and Phenocams as well as the spaceborne Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI) for assessing growth and dynamic changes in four alpine meadows. We analyzed the similarity of the NDVI on diverse spatial scales and to what extent grassland dynamics of alpine meadows can be detected. We found that NDVI across all sensors traces the growing phases of the vegetation although we experienced a notable variability in NDVI signals among sensors and differences among the sites and plots. We noticed differences in signal saturation, sensor specific offsets, and in the detectability of short-term events. These NDVI inconsistencies depended on sensor-specific spatial and spectral resolutions and acquisition geometries, as well as on grassland management activities and vegetation growth during the year. We demonstrated that the combination of multiple-sensors enhanced the possibility for detecting short-term dynamic changes throughout the year for each of the stations. The presented findings are relevant for building and evaluating a combined sensor approach for consistent vegetation monitoring. View Full-Text
Keywords: Grassland dynamics; alpine grassland; Sentinel-2 MSI; Spectroradiometer; Phenocam; Spectral Reflectance Sensors; multiscale; multisensor; NDVI Grassland dynamics; alpine grassland; Sentinel-2 MSI; Spectroradiometer; Phenocam; Spectral Reflectance Sensors; multiscale; multisensor; NDVI
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Rossi, M.; Niedrist, G.; Asam, S.; Tonon, G.; Tomelleri, E.; Zebisch, M. A Comparison of the Signal from Diverse Optical Sensors for Monitoring Alpine Grassland Dynamics. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 296.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop