Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Acquisition Date on the Prediction Performance of Topsoil Organic Carbon from Sentinel-2 for Croplands
Previous Article in Journal
Night on South Korea: Unraveling the Relationship between Urban Development Patterns and DMSP-OLS Night-Time Lights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deep Residual Autoencoder with Multiscaling for Semantic Segmentation of Land-Use Images

1
State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Systems, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datun Road, Beijing 100101, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(18), 2142; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182142
Submission received: 4 August 2019 / Revised: 9 September 2019 / Accepted: 11 September 2019 / Published: 14 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing Image Processing)

Abstract

Semantic segmentation is a fundamental means of extracting information from remotely sensed images at the pixel level. Deep learning has enabled considerable improvements in efficiency and accuracy of semantic segmentation of general images. Typical models range from benchmarks such as fully convolutional networks, U-Net, Micro-Net, and dilated residual networks to the more recently developed DeepLab 3+. However, many of these models were originally developed for segmentation of general or medical images and videos, and are not directly relevant to remotely sensed images. The studies of deep learning for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed images are limited. This paper presents a novel flexible autoencoder-based architecture of deep learning that makes extensive use of residual learning and multiscaling for robust semantic segmentation of remotely sensed land-use images. In this architecture, a deep residual autoencoder is generalized to a fully convolutional network in which residual connections are implemented within and between all encoding and decoding layers. Compared with the concatenated shortcuts in U-Net, these residual connections reduce the number of trainable parameters and improve the learning efficiency by enabling extensive backpropagation of errors. In addition, resizing or atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) can be leveraged to capture multiscale information from the input images to enhance the robustness to scale variations. The residual learning and multiscaling strategies improve the trained model’s generalizability, as demonstrated in the semantic segmentation of land-use types in two real-world datasets of remotely sensed images. Compared with U-Net, the proposed method improves the Jaccard index (JI) or the mean intersection over union (MIoU) by 4-11% in the training phase and by 3-9% in the validation and testing phases. With its flexible deep learning architecture, the proposed approach can be easily applied for and transferred to semantic segmentation of land-use variables and other surface variables of remotely sensed images.
Keywords: residual learning; autoencoder; multiscale; atrous spatial pyramid pooling; semantic segmentation; remotely sensed land-use images residual learning; autoencoder; multiscale; atrous spatial pyramid pooling; semantic segmentation; remotely sensed land-use images
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L. Deep Residual Autoencoder with Multiscaling for Semantic Segmentation of Land-Use Images. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182142

AMA Style

Li L. Deep Residual Autoencoder with Multiscaling for Semantic Segmentation of Land-Use Images. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11(18):2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Lianfa. 2019. "Deep Residual Autoencoder with Multiscaling for Semantic Segmentation of Land-Use Images" Remote Sensing 11, no. 18: 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182142

APA Style

Li, L. (2019). Deep Residual Autoencoder with Multiscaling for Semantic Segmentation of Land-Use Images. Remote Sensing, 11(18), 2142. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop