# A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability Indicators in the Villagers’ Lives in Iran with Emphasis on Earthquake Hazard: A Case Study

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

#### Study Area

^{2}, is located at the south of Zanjan province, between 48°35′ S and 36°07′ E (Figure 1). This county is subdivided into four districts: Central district, Afshar district, BizinehRud district and SojasRud district. The Central district, KharaRud County, was selected as the statistical population. This County has got 30 villages four of which (ZarirnGol, Mahmudabad, Ghushekand and Khaleqabad) were assessed asstudied villages. There were several reasons for choosing these villages, the most important being this area’s presence in a seismic zone. The area was also selected because it was the most populous in comparison with other villages. 31.97% of the central district is occupied by and 53.26% of the total population live in the four villages.

## 2. Literature Review

## 3. Materials and Methods

#### Analytical Model Algorithm (ELECTRE)

**Step 1.**Formation of decision matrix; this matrix contains the values that the criteria assume for each alternative considered [25].

**Step 2.**Determining the Normalized decision matrix; normalization translates data measured with various units—e.g., points and percentage—into weighted dimensionless values of different criteria [26,27].

**Step 3.**Determining the weighted normalized decision matrix by formula: V

_{ij}= W

_{j}× R

_{ij}.

**Step 4.**Formation of Concordance index; the concordance index, $\mathrm{C}\left(\mathrm{a},\text{}\mathrm{b}\right)$ is the sum of all the weights for those criteria where the performance score of alternative “a” is at least as that of alternative “b” [28,29,30].

**Step 5.**Formation of Discordance index; the discordance index, $\mathrm{D}\left(\mathrm{a},\text{}\mathrm{b}\right)$ measures the degree to which alternative “a” is worse than alternative “b” [31].

**Step 6.**Concordance Dominance matrix; is calculated by comparing the values of concordance matrix with threshold value $\left(\overline{\mathrm{c}}\right)$.

**Step 7.**Discordance Dominance matrix; in a similar way, the discordance dominance matrix can be calculated with the help of discordance indices and the threshold value $\left(\overline{\mathrm{d}}\right)$ [32]. The matrix takes on values 0 or 1.

**Step 8.**Determining the Aggregate Dominance matrix; is the intersection of concordance dominance matrix and discordance dominance matrix [29]. The matrix takes on values 0 or 1.

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Ranking the Villages of KharaRud Rural District Based on the Sustainability against the Risks of Earthquakes

#### 4.1.1 First Step: Formation of Decision Matrix

_{ij}demonstrates the performance of alternative Ai when it is evaluated in terms of decision criterion C

_{j}[37]. In this research alternatives are villages and criteria are the five ones mentioned and coded (C1 to C5), for example, C2 means the satisfaction rate from physical criteria of villagers against risks of the earthquake (Table 5).

#### 4.1.2. The Second Stage: Normalizing the Decision Matrix

#### 4.1.3. The Third Stage: Formation of Weighted Criteria Matrix

#### 4.1.4. Forth Stage: Formation of Concordance Matrix of Criteria

- W
_{i}−i-th criterion weight index and - ${\mathrm{c}}_{\mathrm{k}}\left(\mathrm{a},\text{}\mathrm{b}\right)$—Concordance index from the point of view of the i-th criterion [43].

#### 4.1.5. Fifth Stage: Formation of the Discordance Matrix of Criteria

#### 4.1.6. Sixth Step: Formation of Concordance Dominance Matrix of Criteria

#### 4.1.7. Seventh Stage: Formation of Discordance Dominance Matrix of Criteria

#### 4.1.8. Eighth Stage: Determine the Aggregate Dominance Matrix

#### 4.1.9. Ninth Stage: Removing the Alternatives with Less Satisfaction and Choose the Best Alternative

## 5. Conclusions

- Due to the fact that the participation and cooperation rate in the level of the villages was high (the desirability of the social stability index), it is recommended that government agencies use this participation and cooperation and gather people in the mosques to teach them emergency training
- Encouraging and providing financial support (bank facilities) to the villagers in order to build or repair homes to minimize the risks of earthquake
- Strict supervision of the public sector on the construction of houses, in order to retrofit rural houses
- Since two villages of Gushekand and Khaleqabad are in an undesirable status in terms of the stability compared to the other two villages, it is suggested to train these villages in terms of placement ,installation of equipment on the walls and in terms of first-aid with training by Red Crescent departments.

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- United Nations General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 21 August 2017).
- Tilio, L.; Murgante, B.; di Trani, F.; Vona, M.; Masi, A. Resilient city and seismic risk: A spatial multicriteria approach. In Proceedings of the ICCSA—Computational Science and Its Applications, Santander, Spain, 20–23 June 2011; pp. 410–422. [Google Scholar]
- Ghadiry, M.; Nasabi, N. An Analysis on the Differences of Mental-Perception Readiness of Families to Earthquake, Shiraz City. Sci. J. Manag. Syst.
**2015**, 3, 227–245. [Google Scholar] - Uitto, J.I. The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: A theoretical framework. Appl. Geogr.
**1998**, 18, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cutter, S.L.; Boruff, B.J.; Shirley, W.L. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Q.
**2003**, 84, 242–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Prelog, A.J.; Miller, L.M. Perceptions of Disaster Risk and Vulnerability in Rural Texas. J. Rural Soc. Sci.
**2013**, 28, 1–31. [Google Scholar] - Iranian Statistics Center. Zanjan Statistical Yearbook. Available online: https://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/1/yearbook/1390/preliminary.pdf (accessed on 22 August 2017).
- C.I.D.A. Sustainable Development; Policy Branch, Canadian International Development Agency: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Taherkhani, M.; Qeydari, H.S.; Sadeghloo, T. Comparative Assessment of Ranking Methods for Natural Disasters in Rural Regions (Case Study: Zanjan Province). Rural Res.
**2012**, 2, 31–54. [Google Scholar] - Poortaheri, M.; Hajinejad, A.; Fatahi, A.; Nemati, R. Physical vulnerability assessment of rural habitats against natural hazards (earthquakes) with a decision model (KOPRAS) (Case study Chalan Cholan villages, Dorud Township). Sci. Res. J. Spat. Plan.
**2014**, 18, 29–52. [Google Scholar] - Goldman, A. Tradition and change in postharvest pest management in Kenya. Agric. Hum. Values
**1991**, 8, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Singh, N.C.; Strickland, R.S. From Legacy to Vision: Sustainability, Poverty and Policy Adjustment; International Institute for Sustainable Development: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Moghaddam, N.B.; Nasiri, M.; Mousavi, S.M. An appropriate multiple criteria decision making method for solving electricity planning problems, addressing sustainability issue. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.
**2011**, 8, 605–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Colantonio, A. Social Sustainability: Exploring the Linkages Between Research, Policy and Practice. In European Research on Sustainable Development; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 35–57. [Google Scholar]
- Motiei, H. Rural Planning with an Emphasis on Iran; SID: Mashhad, Iran, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Tavakoli, J.; Rostami, B. Sustainability of Rural Settlements in Takab County. Village Dev.
**2013**, 16, 63–83. [Google Scholar] - Pourebrahim, S. Assessing of the Contribution of Sustainability Indicators in a Healthy Urban City (case study: Arak city, Iran). Hum. Environ.
**2014**, 12, 63–73. [Google Scholar] - Fazelniya, G.; Hakimdoost, S.Y.; Yarmohammadi, M. Natural Disaster Risk Zoning in Rural Areas Using Gis with Emphasis on Landslides Factor (Case Study: Dohezar Dehestan of Tonekaon County). J. Res. Rural Plan.
**2015**, 4, 11–20. [Google Scholar] - Farajzadeh, M.; Ahadnezhad, M.; Amini, J. The Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Housing in Earthquake against (A Case Study: 9th district of Tehran municipality). J. Urban Reg. Stud. Res.
**2011**, 3, 19–36. [Google Scholar] - Omidvar, K. Natural Hazards, 1st ed.; Yazd University Press: Yazd, Iran, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- SavadKuhifar, S. Prinnciples of Civil, Urban Crisis Management Projects; University of Imam Hussein: Tehran, Iran, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.-Z.; Engdahl, E.R. Great earthquakes in the 21st century and geodynamics of the Tibetan Plateau. Tectonophysics
**2013**, 584, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Di Matteo, U.; Pezzimenti, P.M.; Astiaso Garcia, D. Methodological proposal for optimal location of emergency operation centers through multi-criteria approach. Sustainability
**2016**, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Roy, B. The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory Decis.
**1991**, 31, 49–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Banaitiene, N.; Banaitis, A.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E.K. Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach. Omega
**2008**, 36, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mulliner, E.; Smallbone, K.; Maliene, V. An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method. Omega
**2013**, 41, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qelichi, M.M.; Murgante, B.; Farhoudi, R.; Shahraki, S.Z.; Ziari, K.; Pourahmad, A. Analyzing Effective Factors on Urban Growth Management Focusing on Remote Sensing Indices in Karaj, Iran; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 469–484. [Google Scholar]
- Belton, V.; Stewart, T.J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach; Springer US, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Athawale, V.M.; Chakraborty, S. A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput.
**2011**, 2, 831–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Park, D.; Kim, Y.; Um, M.; Choi, S. Robust Priority for Strategic Environmental Assessment with Incomplete Information Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Analysis. Sustainability
**2015**, 7, 10233–10249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rao, R.V. Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Veeramachaneni, S.; Kandikonda, H. An ELECTRE Approach for Multicriteria Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Group Decision Making Problems. Adv. Fuzzy Syst.
**2016**, 2016, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ataei, M. Selecting Alumina—Cement Plant Location By ELECTRE Approach. Int. J. Eng.
**2008**, 19, 55–63. [Google Scholar] - Vona, M.; Anelli, A.; Mastroberti, M.; Murgante, B.; Santa-Cruz, S. Prioritization strategies to reduce the seismic risk of the public and strategic buildings. Disaster Adv.
**2017**, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] - Rogers, M.; Bruen, M.; Maystre, L.-Y. Electre and Decision Support; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lootsma, F.A.; Mensch, T.C.A.; Vos, F.A. Multi-criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long-term research planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**1990**, 47, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Triantaphyllou, E.; Shu, B. Multi-criteria decision making: An operations research approach. Encycl. Electr. Electron. Eng.
**1998**, 15, 175–186. [Google Scholar] - Tille, M.; Dumont, A.-G. Methods of multicriteria decision analysis within the road projects like an element of the sustainability. In Proceedings of the 3rd STRC Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 19–21 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Sudhira, H.S.; Ramachandra, T.V.; Raj, K.S.; Jagadish, K.S. Urban growth analysis using spatial and temporal data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens.
**2003**, 31, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Affisco, J.F.; Chanin, M.N. An Empirical Investigation of Integrated Multicriteria Group Decision Models in a Simulation/Gaming Context. Simul. Gaming
**1990**, 21, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lapucci, A. Lapucci. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Figueira, J.; Mousseau, V.; Roy, B. Electre methods Introduction: A brief history. Mult. Criteria Decis. Anal. State Art Surv.
**2005**, 233, 1–35. [Google Scholar] - Solecka, K. Electre III method in assessment of variants of integrated urban public transport system in Cracow. Transp. Probl.
**2014**, 9, 83–96. [Google Scholar] - Tilio, L.; Murgante, B.; di Trani, F.; Vona, M.; Masi, A. Mitigation of urban vulnerability through a spatial multicriteria approach. Disaster Adv.
**2012**, 5, 138–143. [Google Scholar] - Vona, M.; Harabaglia, P.; Murgante, B. Thinking about resilient cities: Studying Italian earthquakes. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan.
**2016**, 169, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gizzi, F.T.; Tilio, L.; Masini, N.; Murgante, B.; Potenza, M.R.; Zotta, C. High-Detail Damage Pattern in Towns Hit by Earthquakes of the Past: An Approach to Evaluate the Reliability of the Historical Sources. In Earthquake Hazard Impact and Urban Planning; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 105–125. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Study area of central district of KharaRud County. (

**a**) Map of Iran; (

**b**) Khodabande County; (

**c**) Central district of KharaRud; (

**d**) The studied villages.

Type of Risk | Conditions for the occurrence | ||
---|---|---|---|

Earthquake | Rainfall | Other | |

Earthquake and its related phenomena | • | ||

Volcano | • | ||

Landslide | • | • | • |

Subsidence caused by water harvesting, oil, … | • | ||

Local subsidence (caused by loss of subterranean cavities and shafts) | • | • | • |

Subsidence caused by dissolution | • | ||

Problematic soils | • | • | |

Non-engineering levee (manual soils) | • | ||

Deep loss | • | • |

No. | City | District | County | Village | Total Population | Number of Households |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | Khodabande | Central | Khara Rud | Zarian Gol | 1343 | 372 |

2 | Khodabande | Central | Khara Rud | Mahmud Abad | 2906 | 782 |

3 | Khodabande | Central | Khara Rud | Gushekand | 549 | 132 |

4 | Khodabande | Central | Khara Rud | Khaleqabad | 951 | 253 |

Index | Cronbach’s Alpha |
---|---|

Social | 0.701 |

Physical | 0.737 |

Operational | 0.750 |

Economic | 0.687 |

Political | 0.664 |

Sustainability Indicators | The Studied Statements |
---|---|

Social index | Participation—social base—belief or non-belief in fatalism to the occurrence of earthquake—the rate of interest to attend training classes—the rate of interest to transfer their experiences to others |

Physical index | Housing conditions (type of material—antiquity of the building, quality of the building, number of floors)—existence of safe neighbourhoods, having necessary facilities |

Political index | Public sector support in connection with the financing, the necessary permits for construction, supervision in construction, issues related to congestion, public awareness through the media, training courses by government and related organs |

Operational index | Individual consciousness, individual skills, individual readiness, the training of children and families by household head, the classes that attended ever for training, help the wounded and injured people in the event of a crisis |

Economic index | Affordability to build or repair and retrofit housing—Affordability to buy essential facilities in times of crisis (having first aid kits, etc.), the financial strength necessary to insure the building |

**Table 5.**The status quo matrix based on the satisfaction rate from sustainability indicators of villagers against risks of the earthquake.

Alternative/Criteria | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Social | Physical | Operational | Economic | Political | ||

A1 | Mahmud Abad | 3.060 | 2.910 | 2.829 | 2.450 | 2.983 |

A2 | Khaleq Abad | 3.177 | 2.841 | 2.114 | 2.331 | 2.761 |

A3 | Gushe Kand | 3.340 | 2.915 | 2.000 | 2.294 | 2.800 |

A4 | Zarian Gol | 3.473 | 2.638 | 3.240 | 2.297 | 2.870 |

Normalized Matrix | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | 0.522 | 0.523 | 0.545 | 0.514 | 0.468 |

A2 | 0.484 | 0.497 | 0.407 | 0.502 | 0.486 |

A3 | 0.490 | 0.489 | 0.385 | 0.515 | 0.511 |

A4 | 0.503 | 0.490 | 0.624 | 0.466 | 0.532 |

Code | Criteria | Weight |
---|---|---|

C1 | Social | 0.051 |

C2 | Physical | 0.035 |

C3 | Operational | 0.879 |

C4 | Economic | 0.016 |

C5 | Political | 0.019 |

Weighted Matrix | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.479 | 0.018 | 0.024 |

A2 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.358 | 0.018 | 0.025 |

A3 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.339 | 0.018 | 0.026 |

A4 | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.549 | 0.016 | 0.027 |

Concordance Matrix | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 |
---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | ----- | 0.949 | 0.914 | 0.070 |

A2 | 0.051 | ----- | 0.895 | 0.051 |

A3 | 0.086 | 0.105 | ----- | 0.035 |

A4 | 0.930 | 0.949 | 0.965 | ----- |

Discordance Matrix | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 |
---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | ----- | 0.007 | 0.015 | 1 |

A2 | 1 | ----- | 0.065 | 1 |

A3 | 1 | 1 | ----- | 1 |

A4 | 0.0242 | 0.006 | 0.008 | ----- |

Concordance Dominance Matrix | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 |
---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | - | 1 | 1 | 0 |

A2 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 |

A3 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 |

A4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |

Discordance Dominance Matrix | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 |
---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | - | 1 | 1 | 0 |

A2 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 |

A3 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 |

A4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |

Aggregate Dominance Matrix | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 |
---|---|---|---|---|

A1 | - | 1 | 1 | 0 |

A2 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 |

A3 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 |

A4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |

The Domination Number Matrix | Alternative | Result |
---|---|---|

3 | A4 | Zariangol |

2 | A1 | Mahmudabad |

1 | A2 | Khaleqabad |

0 | A3 | Gushekand |

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Murgante, B.; Salmani, M.; Molaei Qelichi, M.; Hajilo, M. A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability Indicators in the Villagers’ Lives in Iran with Emphasis on Earthquake Hazard: A Case Study. *Sustainability* **2017**, *9*, 1491.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081491

**AMA Style**

Murgante B, Salmani M, Molaei Qelichi M, Hajilo M. A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability Indicators in the Villagers’ Lives in Iran with Emphasis on Earthquake Hazard: A Case Study. *Sustainability*. 2017; 9(8):1491.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081491

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Murgante, Beniamino, Mohamad Salmani, Mohamad Molaei Qelichi, and Mehdi Hajilo. 2017. "A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Sustainability Indicators in the Villagers’ Lives in Iran with Emphasis on Earthquake Hazard: A Case Study" *Sustainability* 9, no. 8: 1491.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081491