Next Article in Journal
How Do Internet Enterprises Obtain Sustainable Development of Organizational Ecology? A Case Study of LeEco Using Institutional Logic Theory
Previous Article in Journal
The Sustainability of Businesses in Kigali, Rwanda: An Analysis of the Barriers Faced by Women Entrepreneurs
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(8), 1373;

Using Government Resettlement Projects as a Sustainable Adaptation Strategy for Climate Change

4,* , 4,5
The Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecological Function and Restoration, Beijing 100091, China
Beijing Hanshiqiao National Wetland Ecosystem Research Station, Beijing 101399, China
Institute for Land, Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
The National Research Centre for Resettlement, Nanjing 210098, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 July 2017 / Revised: 31 July 2017 / Accepted: 1 August 2017 / Published: 4 August 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [1946 KB, uploaded 4 August 2017]   |  


Given that increasing migration has been addressed as a major consequence of climate change, a growing number of scholars suggest that the planned relocation of people or Government Resettlement Projects (GRPs) should be included in climate change adaptation. This paper reviews the status of climate change and environmentally induced migration in China, and then presents an empirical case study in Shangnan County in northwest China, where a specific GRP called the ‘Massive Southern Shaanxi Migration Program’ (MSSMP) has been initiated in response to climate change-related impacts. The results showed that the MSSMP helped local residents to adapt better climate change by reducing exposures to risk, enabling mobility, providing financial incentives, raising living standards, and improving emotional status. Furthermore, the MSSMP added additional benefits for migrants compared with traditional GRPs by respecting voluntary participation, preparing for future risks, and reducing social isolation via a short relocation distance. However, GRPs could also be seen as a maladaptation to climate change because they disproportionately increase the burden on the most vulnerable community members, such as those who are financially disadvantaged, new migrants, and people who are left behind. The paper further suggests that the GRPs should be designed by involving multiple adaptation strategies as supplements for GRPs, and broadening the political schemes to consider the special needs of vulnerable groups. This study contributes to an understanding of the roles of GRPs in sustainable climate change adaptation, thereby facilitating the design, organization, and implication of future similar programs. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate change; government resettlement projects; sustainable; adaptation; maladaptation climate change; government resettlement projects; sustainable; adaptation; maladaptation

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lei, Y.; Finlayson, C.M.; Thwaites, R.; Shi, G.; Cui, L. Using Government Resettlement Projects as a Sustainable Adaptation Strategy for Climate Change. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1373.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top