Next Article in Journal
Determination of the Suitability of Some American Grapevine Rootstocks as a New Edible Landscape Component of Vertical Gardens
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Food Waste on Wildlife and Humans
Article

Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA

1
GIS Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran 15875-1774, Iran
2
GIS Department, Khaje Nasiroddin Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 19967-15433, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(7), 1274; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071274
Received: 6 May 2017 / Revised: 15 July 2017 / Accepted: 17 July 2017 / Published: 19 July 2017
Most of the world’s population is concentrated in accumulated spaces in the form of cities, making the concept of urban planning a significant issue for consideration by decision makers. Urban vulnerability is a major issue which arises in urban management, and is simply defined as how vulnerable various structures in a city are to different hazards. Reducing urban vulnerability and enhancing resilience are considered to be essential steps towards achieving urban sustainability. To date, a vast body of literature has focused on investigating urban systems’ vulnerabilities with regard to natural hazards. However, less attention has been paid to vulnerabilities resulting from man-made hazards. This study proposes to investigate the physical vulnerability of buildings in District 6 of Tehran, Iran, with respect to intentional explosion hazards. A total of 14 vulnerability criteria are identified according to the opinions of various experts, and standard maps for each of these criteria have been generated in a GIS environment. Ultimately, an ordered weighted averaging (OWA) technique was applied to generate vulnerability maps for different risk conditions. The results of the present study indicate that only about 25 percent of buildings in the study area have a low level of vulnerability under moderate risk conditions. Sensitivity analysis further illustrates the robustness of the results obtained. Finally, the paper concludes by arguing that local authorities must focus more on risk-reduction techniques in order to reduce physical vulnerability and achieve urban sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban sustainability; urban physical vulnerability; intentional explosion hazards; fuzzy set theory; multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); geospatial information systems (GIS) urban sustainability; urban physical vulnerability; intentional explosion hazards; fuzzy set theory; multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); geospatial information systems (GIS)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghajari, Y.E.; Alesheikh, A.A.; Modiri, M.; Hosnavi, R.; Abbasi, M. Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071274

AMA Style

Ghajari YE, Alesheikh AA, Modiri M, Hosnavi R, Abbasi M. Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA. Sustainability. 2017; 9(7):1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghajari, Yasser E., Ali A. Alesheikh, Mahdi Modiri, Reza Hosnavi, and Morteza Abbasi. 2017. "Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA" Sustainability 9, no. 7: 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071274

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop