Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Traceability in the Food Supply Chain: The Impact of Consumer Willingness to Pay
Previous Article in Journal
Are Crowdsourced Datasets Suitable for Specialized Routing Services? Case Study of OpenStreetMap for Routing of People with Limited Mobility
Article

The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning

1
Department of Knowledge Management and Communication, Faculty of Economics and Globalization, Danube University, 3500 Krems, Austria
2
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 991; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060991
Received: 3 April 2017 / Revised: 18 May 2017 / Accepted: 27 May 2017 / Published: 9 June 2017
This paper discusses the role normative aspects play in different approaches of science–practice collaboration, in particular as action research, (Mode 2) Transdisciplinarity (Td), Transition Management (TM), and Transformative Science (TSc). We elaborate on the different roles that scientists in these processes play. They work as facilitators (or contribute to a facilitated Td process), as activists (i.e., activist researchers) in TM projects, and as catalysts in TSc. Td processes develop socially robust solutions for sustainable transitioning and impacts on the science system through mutual learning and by integrating epistemics (i.e., ways of knowing) from science and practice and focusing on the empowerment of stakeholders. Science is viewed as a public good aiming to serve all key stakeholders. Researchers involved in TM projects strive to influence ongoing transition processes by actively engaging and participating in them, including lobbying for and empowering transformative changes toward sustainability based upon the researchers’ own analyses and world views. The TSc approach takes a catalyst perspective of the scientist’s role in inducing processes of strategic (societal) transition when including certain stakeholder groups. The paper focuses on what roles normative aspects play in the different approaches and new societal demands imposed on science and universities. Based on this, we conclude that a new order of universities, public knowledge institutions, and boundary institutions is forthcoming. View Full-Text
Keywords: transdisciplinarity; transition management; transformative science; normative issues in science; societal demands; roles of scientists transdisciplinarity; transition management; transformative science; normative issues in science; societal demands; roles of scientists
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Scholz, R.W. The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning. Sustainability 2017, 9, 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060991

AMA Style

Scholz RW. The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning. Sustainability. 2017; 9(6):991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060991

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scholz, Roland W. 2017. "The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning" Sustainability 9, no. 6: 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060991

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop