Next Article in Journal
Hybrid and Cooperative Strategies Using Harmony Search and Artificial Immune Systems for Solving the Nurse Rostering Problem
Previous Article in Journal
Social Impact Assessment of Rebuilding an Urban Neighborhood: A Case Study of a Demolition and Reconstruction Project in Petah Tikva, Israel
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 1078;

Enhancing the Sustainability Narrative through a Deeper Understanding of Sustainable Development Indicators

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Beijing Engineering Research Center for Watershed Environmental Restoration & Integrated Ecological Regulation, Beijing 100875, China
Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
University of Naples ‘Parthenope’, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 April 2017 / Revised: 11 June 2017 / Accepted: 12 June 2017 / Published: 21 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Use of the Environment and Resources)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3171 KB, uploaded 21 June 2017]   |  


Different sustainability indicators tend to reflect different or even converse outcomes in terms of countries. A careful comparative study is needed to clarify whether these indicators are actually coherent with each other. We analyze and compare five sustainable development indicators. Pearson correlation was used to make a comparative study among them. Within the two groups, the indicators are positively correlated. The Sustainable Development Index (SDI) of the second group also shares a negative correlation with the Human Development Index. On the other side, the Emergy Sustainability Index was negatively correlated with the Environmental Performance Index, and had little or no correlation with the Environmental Sustainability Index. Furthermore, when examining the scores obtained from the different SDIs, the results demonstrate that they might present somewhat conflicting findings, if not considering their complementarity. This, from one side, depends on the fact that Human Development Index (HDI), Environmental Performance Index (EPI), and Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) provide a short-term local perspective on “sustainability”, while the Emergy-based Sustainability Index (EmSI) and Surplus Biocapacity are more long-term and global in their perspective. HDI, EPI, and ESI have a more social and economic focus, including indicators whose dynamics are disjoined from the natural one. The emerging differences might be explained through the analysis of the individual sub-indicators for each of the SDIs. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development indicators; emergy sustainability index; Surplus Biocapacity sustainable development indicators; emergy sustainability index; Surplus Biocapacity

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, G.; Brown, M.T.; Casazza, M. Enhancing the Sustainability Narrative through a Deeper Understanding of Sustainable Development Indicators. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1078.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top