Next Article in Journal
San Antonio 360: The Rise and Decline of the Concentric City 1890–2010
Previous Article in Journal
Exclusive Contexts Resolver: A Low-Power Sensing Management System for Sustainable Context-Awareness in Exclusive Contexts
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(4), 644;

Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis

Department of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Received: 6 March 2017 / Revised: 7 April 2017 / Accepted: 12 April 2017 / Published: 19 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Education and Approaches)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1179 KB, uploaded 19 April 2017]   |  


This paper divides the typical social scientific research process into two stages: the research development stage and the research innovation stage, with personnel as a shared input between them. We construct an input-shared multi-period two-stage DEA (data envelopment analysis) model as measurement of sustainability capacities of social scientific research, and then measure both the overall efficiencies and the stage efficiencies of scientific research of 18 HEIs (higher education institutions) in Jiangsu province of China from 2010 to 2014. There are some revelatory traits among the overall efficiencies and stage efficiencies of HEIs. As for the HEIs, the efficiencies of the first stage of certain HEIs that are better in social science are higher than those which have advantage in natural science. The results are the opposite in the second stage. Additionally, in virtue of common-weight global MPI (Malmquist Productivity Index), we figure out the dynamic efficiencies within and between HEIs. Finally, we appeal to administration departments to establish academic sharing systems and construct interdisciplinary ecosystems among HEIs, which aims to pool the knowledge, experience, and capacities of the region’s academic actors and improve the sustainable development and innovation abilities of social scientific research. In addition, collaborating with industrial organizations is also a strategic avenue to improve their research abilities, which can push the boundaries of sustainable development and also bring vigor in social scientific research. View Full-Text
Keywords: social scientific research; performance; DEA; MPI; HEIs social scientific research; performance; DEA; MPI; HEIs

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Hu, H. Sustainable Evaluation of Social Science Research in Higher Education Institutions Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Sustainability 2017, 9, 644.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top