Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods
AbstractWildfires impact the outcomes of forest management plans. Addressing that impact is thus critical for effective forest ecosystem management planning. This paper presents research on the use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that integrate wildfire risk in planning contexts characterized by multiple objectives. Specifically, an a posteriori preference modeling approach is developed that adds wildfire criteria to a set of objectives representing ecosystem services supply values. Wildfire risk criteria are derived from stand-level wildfire occurrence and damage models as well as from the characteristics of neighboring stands that may impact wildfire probability and spread. A forested landscape classified into 1976 stands is used for testing purposes. The management planning criteria include the carbon stock, harvest volumes for three forest species, the volume of the ending inventory, and resistance to wildfire risk indicators. Results show the potential of multiple criteria decision making methods to provide information about trade-offs between wildfire risk and the supply of provisioning (timber) as well as regulatory (carbon) ecosystem services. This information may contribute to the effectiveness of forest ecosystem management planning. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Marques, S.; Marto, M.; Bushenkov, V.; McDill, M.; Borges, J. Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods. Sustainability 2017, 9, 298.
Marques S, Marto M, Bushenkov V, McDill M, Borges J. Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods. Sustainability. 2017; 9(2):298.Chicago/Turabian Style
Marques, Susete; Marto, Marco; Bushenkov, Vladimir; McDill, Marc; Borges, JoséG. 2017. "Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods." Sustainability 9, no. 2: 298.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.