Next Article in Journal
Exploring Change in China’s Carbon Intensity: A Decomposition Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
The MIMOSE Approach to Support Sustainable Forest Management Planning at Regional Scale in Mediterranean Contexts
Previous Article in Journal
A Conservation Approach of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): Improving Traditional Agricultural Patterns and Promoting Scale-Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustaining the Joint Production of Timber and Lactarius Mushroom: A Case Study of a Forest Management Planning Unit in Northwestern Turkey
Article

Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods

1
Forest Research Center, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Research Centre for Mathematics and Applications, University of Évora, Colégio Luís Verney, Rua Romão Ramalho, 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
3
Department of Ecosystems Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, 310 Forest Resources Building University Park, State College, PA 16802-4301, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2017, 9(2), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298
Received: 30 November 2016 / Revised: 13 February 2017 / Accepted: 14 February 2017 / Published: 18 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Decision Support for Forest Ecosystem Management Sustainability)
Wildfires impact the outcomes of forest management plans. Addressing that impact is thus critical for effective forest ecosystem management planning. This paper presents research on the use of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that integrate wildfire risk in planning contexts characterized by multiple objectives. Specifically, an a posteriori preference modeling approach is developed that adds wildfire criteria to a set of objectives representing ecosystem services supply values. Wildfire risk criteria are derived from stand-level wildfire occurrence and damage models as well as from the characteristics of neighboring stands that may impact wildfire probability and spread. A forested landscape classified into 1976 stands is used for testing purposes. The management planning criteria include the carbon stock, harvest volumes for three forest species, the volume of the ending inventory, and resistance to wildfire risk indicators. Results show the potential of multiple criteria decision making methods to provide information about trade-offs between wildfire risk and the supply of provisioning (timber) as well as regulatory (carbon) ecosystem services. This information may contribute to the effectiveness of forest ecosystem management planning. View Full-Text
Keywords: multiple criteria decision making methods; Pareto frontier methods; wildfire risk criteria; ecosystem services multiple criteria decision making methods; Pareto frontier methods; wildfire risk criteria; ecosystem services
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Marques, S.; Marto, M.; Bushenkov, V.; McDill, M.; Borges, J. Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods. Sustainability 2017, 9, 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298

AMA Style

Marques S, Marto M, Bushenkov V, McDill M, Borges J. Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods. Sustainability. 2017; 9(2):298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marques, Susete, Marco Marto, Vladimir Bushenkov, Marc McDill, and JoséG. Borges 2017. "Addressing Wildfire Risk in Forest Management Planning with Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods" Sustainability 9, no. 2: 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020298

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop