Next Article in Journal
Wind Power Deployment: The Role of Public Participation in the Decision-Making Process in Ontario, Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Green Energy for a Green City—A Multi-Perspective Model Approach
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(8), 711;

Rurality and Collective Attitude Effects on Wolf Policy

Department of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå 901 87, Sweden
Academic Editor: Helmut Haberl
Received: 27 February 2016 / Revised: 19 July 2016 / Accepted: 20 July 2016 / Published: 26 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Social Ecology and Sustainability)
Full-Text   |   PDF [640 KB, uploaded 29 July 2016]   |  


Debates over wolf policy are driven by an underlying attitudinal divide between people from urban and rural areas. This study explores how the power relationship between urban and rural groups interact with individual attitude formation in relation to wolf policy, in order to understand why dissatisfaction with wolf policy tends to result in group level conflict patterns. Using Swedish survey data, I analyze attitudes to wolf policy, in relation to collective level effects and rural political alienation. Findings indicate that individual level attitudes towards the Swedish wolf policy are in part determined by collective attitude patterns: effects that could be contingent on political alienation. This highlights the possibility of reducing attitude polarization with respect to the wolf policy, by addressing political alienation among the rural population. View Full-Text
Keywords: wolf; rural-urban divide; political alienation; rurality; conservation policy; collective attitude effects wolf; rural-urban divide; political alienation; rurality; conservation policy; collective attitude effects

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Eriksson, M. Rurality and Collective Attitude Effects on Wolf Policy. Sustainability 2016, 8, 711.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top