Next Article in Journal
Revisiting the “Guns versus Butter” Argument in China (1950–2014): New Evidence from the Continuous Wavelet Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Transforming Mature Tourism Resorts into Sustainable Tourism Destinations through Participatory Integrated Approaches: The Case of Puerto de la Cruz
Previous Article in Journal
Driving Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Mobile Industry: Evidence from U.S. Wireless Carriers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tourists’ Environmentally Responsible Behavior in Response to Climate Change and Tourist Experiences in Nature-Based Tourism
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Determining Sustainable Tourism in Regions

1
Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia
2
Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, Canberra 2601, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ian Patterson
Sustainability 2016, 8(7), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070660
Received: 8 June 2016 / Revised: 5 July 2016 / Accepted: 6 July 2016 / Published: 12 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Management in Tourism and Hospitality)
The goal of achieving sustainable tourism is now a priority for many tourism planners. It has been suggested that stakeholder analysis is an essential step in determining sustainable tourism in regions, given its highly contextual nature. However, previous research has tended to focus heavily on stakeholders with the assumption that attitudes within groups are homogeneous. This research questions this assumption and in doing so, takes a critical approach by examining attitudes towards sustainable tourism and then assesses whether attitudes align with stakeholder groups. The study was conducted in the island state of Tasmania, Australia, and utilised the Q-methodology to examine attitudes towards sustainable tourism in the Bay of Fires region. The results concur with recent research, which shows that attitudes do not always align with those of stakeholder groups. The critical and reflexive approach suggests that assumptions regarding stakeholder attitudes need to be reviewed and more attention given to people’s contextualised attitudes, rather than the stakeholder group in which they sit. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable tourism; critical approach; Q-methodology; stakeholders; Tasmania sustainable tourism; critical approach; Q-methodology; stakeholders; Tasmania
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hardy, A.; Pearson, L.J. Determining Sustainable Tourism in Regions. Sustainability 2016, 8, 660.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop