Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Data
Searched for topic: (“work engagement” OR “employee engagement” OR “job engagement” OR “role engagement” OR “personal engagement”) Time span: 1990–2015; Coverage: all databases.
2.2. Tools Used in Conducting Research
2.3. Knowledge Infrastructure and the SNA Technique
3. Results
3.1. Semantic Networks
Emerging and Fading Themes (Burst Detection)
3.2. Keyword Co-Occurrence Network
3.2.1. Title Keyword Network
3.2.2. Abstract Keyword Network
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aninkan, D.O.; Oyewole, A.A. The influence of individual and organizational factors on employee engagement. Int. J. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 3, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar]
- Florea, L.; Cheung, Y.H.; Herndon, N.C. For all good reasons: Role of values in organizational sustainability. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 114, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spreitzer, G.; Porath, C.L.; Gibson, C.B. Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organ. Dyn. Q. Rev. Organ. Behav. Prof. Manag. 2012, 41, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knut Haanaes, M.R.; von Velken, I.; Audretsch, M.; Kiron, D.; Kruschwitz, N. Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2012, 53, 69. [Google Scholar]
- Hart, S.L.; Milstein, M.B. Creating sustainable value. Acad. Manag. Exec. 2003, 17, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleinberg, J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2003, 7, 373–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carasco-Saul, M.; Kim, W.; Kim, T. Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2014, 14, 38–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Kwon, K.; Kim, W.; Cho, D. Work engagement and career: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2016, 15, 29–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirvis, P. Employee engagement and CSR: Transactional, relational, and developmental approaches. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2012, 54, 93–117. [Google Scholar]
- Kahn, W.A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 1990, 33, 692–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufeli, W.B.; Salanova, M.; González-romá, V.; Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002, 3, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.; Kolb, J.A.; Kim, T. The relationship between work engagement and performance: A review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2013, 12, 248–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuck, B. Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2011, 10, 304–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haanaes, K.; Balagopal, B.; Arthur, D.; Kong, M.T.; Velken, I.; Kruschwitz, N.; Hopkins, M.S. First look: The second annual sustainability & innovation survey. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2011, 55, 77. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, W. Introduction. In Creating Engaged Employees: It’s Worth the Investment; Rothwell, W.J., Ed.; American Society for Training and Development: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2014; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Harter, J.K.; Schmidt, F.L.; Hayes, T.L. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macey, W.H.; Schneider, B. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2008, 1, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- May, D.R.; Gilson, R.L.; Harter, L.M. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2004, 77, 11–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuters, T. Web of Science (Wos) Database. Available online: http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/web-of-science.html (accessed on 30 June 2016).
- van Eck, N.; Waltman, L. Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2009, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, J.; Yi, S.; Lee, K.C. Analysis of keyword networks in mis research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Inf. Manag. 2011, 48, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, B.; Park, Y. A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2005, 72, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sci2Team. Science of Science (Sci2) Tooi Indiana University and Scitech Strategies. Available online: http://sci2.cns.iu.edu (accessed on 20 May 2016).
- Leydesdorff, L. The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated; Universal-Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Cattell, J.M. A statistical study of american men of science. II. The measurement of scientific merit. Science 1906, 24, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garfield, E. Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 35, 1123–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. Am. Doc. 1963, 14, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, D. Statistical studies of networks of scientific papers. In Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation: Symposium Proceedings; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Cross, R.; Parker, A.; Prusak, L.; Borgatti, S. Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organ. Dyn. 2001, 30, 100–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polites, G.; Watson, R. Using social network analysis to analyze relationships among IS journals. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2009, 10, 595–636. [Google Scholar]
- Acedo, F.J.; Barroso, C.; Casanueva, C.; Calán, J.L. Co-Authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. J. Manag. Stud. 2006, 43, 957–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, G.F.; Wood, J. Information technology management domain: Emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 959–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, C.S.; Soares, A.L. Improving the quality of collaboration requirements for information management through social networks analysis. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2007, 27, 86–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willging, P.A. Using social network analysis techniques to examine online interactions. US-China Educ. Rev. 2005, 2, 46–56. [Google Scholar]
- Mali, F.; Kronegger, L.; Ferligoj, A. Co-authorship trends and collaboration patterns in the Slovenian sociological community. Corvinus J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 2010, 1, 29–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wood, J.; Khan, G.F. International trade negotiation analysis: Network and semantic knowledge infrastructure. Scientometrics 2015, 105, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, K.; Krontalis, A.K.; Ormrod, R.P. Patterns and regularities in the european marketing academic community. In Proceedings of the 2011 Emac Conference, Ljubliana, Slovenia, 24–27 May 2011; European Marketing Academy-EMAC: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev. Int. 2008, 13, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besieux, T.; Baillien, E.; Verbeke, A.L.; Euwema, M.C. What goes around comes around: The mediation of corporate social responsibility in the relationship between transformational leadership and employee engagement. Econ. Ind. Democr. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caesens, G.; Stinglhamber, F.; Luypaert, G. The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being: The role of work-related social support. Career Dev. Int. 2014, 19, 813–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimazu, A.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Kamiyama, K.; Kawakami, N. Workaholism vs. Work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2015, 22, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, Q.; Schaufeli, W.; Taris, T.; Hessen, D.; Hakanen, J.; Salanova, M.; Shimazu, A. East is east and west is west and never the twain shall meet: Work engagement and workaholism across eastern and western cultures. J. Behav. Soc. Sci. 2014, 1, 6–24. [Google Scholar]
- Seppälä, P.; Hakanen, J.; Mauno, S.; Perhoniemi, R.; Tolvanen, A.; Schaufeli, W. Stability and change model of job resources and work engagement: A seven-year three-wave follow-up study. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2015, 24, 360–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, M.L. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 794–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlitzky, M.; Schmidt, F.L.; Rynes, S.L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. 2003, 24, 403–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Choi, Y. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. Soc. Sci. J. 2014, 53, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casey, D.; Sieber, S. Employees, sustainability and motivation: Increasing employee engagement by addressing sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Res. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 6, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
- Sharp, Z.; Zaidman, N. Strategization of CSR. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 93, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, P.L.; Passos, A.M.; Bakker, A.B. Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 2015, 8, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wollard, K.K.; Shuck, B. Antecedents to employee engagement a structured review of the literature. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 2011, 13, 429–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Julia Claxton, D.; Ferreira, P.; Real de Oliveira, E. Does corporate social responsibility impact on employee engagement? J. Workplace Learn. 2014, 26, 232–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilera, R.V.; Rupp, D.E.; Williams, C.A.; Ganapathi, J. Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 836–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tziner, A. Corporative social responsibility (csr) activities in the workplace: A comment on aguinis and glavas (2013). J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2013, 29, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslach, C.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Leiter, M.P. Job burnout. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 397–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cole, M.S.; Walter, F.; Bedeian, A.G.; O’Boyle, E.H. Job burnout and employee engagement a meta-analytic examination of construct proliferation. J. Manag. 2012, 38, 1550–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author Supplied | Abstract | Title | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Word | Weight | Start | End | Word | Weight | Start | End | Word | Weight | Start | End |
share | 2.715476 | 2015 | turn | 4.637259 | 2015 | change | 3.04291 | 2015 | |||
CSR | 2.192607 | 2015 | trait | 4.078944 | 2015 | corporate | 2.179121 | 2015 | |||
workaholic | 2.275462 | 2014 | workaholic | 3.871959 | 2014 | influence | 2.097739 | 2015 | |||
develop | 2.780356 | 2014 | degree | 5.844432 | 2014 | association | 2.86861 | 2015 | |||
mediation | 2.207636 | 2014 | human | 3.971013 | 2013 | 2013 | differential | 2.433204 | 2014 | ||
servant | 1.923196 | 2014 | advance | 3.849541 | 2012 | 2012 | workaholic | 2.729481 | 2014 | ||
autonomic | 1.967753 | 2013 | 2013 | ident | 4.705741 | 2012 | 2012 | combine | 2.314696 | 2014 | |
career | 2.680976 | 2013 | 2013 | independence | 3.679669 | 2012 | 2012 | adapt | 2.046059 | 2014 | |
supervisor | 2.151058 | 2013 | wellbeing | 4.084555 | 2012 | 2012 | impact | 2.881913 | 2014 | ||
adapt | 2.301708 | 2013 | 2013 | Bakker | 3.696665 | 2011 | 2012 | daily | 3.306699 | 2014 | |
perceive | 1.920352 | 2013 | conceptual | 3.710562 | 2011 | 2011 | servant | 2.314696 | 2014 | ||
HRM | 2.487244 | 2013 | 2013 | response | 3.613955 | 2010 | 2010 | exploratory | 1.810843 | 2014 | |
human | 1.998374 | 2013 | 2013 | face | 3.75205 | 2008 | 2008 | office | 2.239392 | 2014 | |
member | 1.967753 | 2013 | 2013 | challenge | 3.76013 | 2008 | 2008 | follow | 1.951375 | 2014 | |
support | 3.001476 | 2013 | situation | 4.263329 | 2007 | 2010 | product | 2.256296 | 2013 | ||
physical | 2.584234 | 2012 | 2012 | general | 4.810572 | 2006 | 2009 | team | 2.740503 | 2013 | |
ergonomic | 2.800629 | 2012 | 2012 | Utrecht | 5.6845 | 2006 | 2008 | qualities | 3.421401 | 2013 | |
therapies | 1.967709 | 2012 | 2012 | scale | 5.063631 | 2006 | 2007 | autonomic | 2.318883 | 2013 | |
ident | 1.874888 | 2012 | 2012 | burnout | 10.28246 | 2006 | 2007 | survey | 2.591387 | 2013 | |
wellbeing | 2.356475 | 2012 | 2013 | exhaust | 5.379206 | 2005 | 2007 | support | 3.134642 | 2013 | |
stress | 2.731086 | 2011 | 2011 | dedication | 7.154425 | 2004 | 2008 | practice | 3.065501 | 2013 | 2013 |
action | 2.319829 | 2011 | 2011 | lack | 4.015737 | 2003 | 2007 | meaning | 2.460724 | 2013 | 2013 |
multi | 1.962539 | 2010 | 2012 | complaint | 3.980277 | 2002 | 2010 | demand | 1.965005 | 2013 | 2013 |
exhaust | 1.916399 | 2010 | 2011 | best | 4.221951 | 2002 | 2008 | promotion | 3.262056 | 2013 | 2013 |
leadership | 2.206522 | 2010 | 2010 | Maslach | 8.160617 | 2002 | 2008 | context | 2.18756 | 2013 | 2013 |
problem | 2.573381 | 2010 | 2011 | inventory | 7.316431 | 2002 | 2007 | social | 2.258694 | 2013 | 2013 |
reward | 2.050866 | 2010 | 2011 | vigor | 5.767682 | 2002 | 2007 | hospital | 2.209024 | 2013 | 2013 |
familiarity | 2.737844 | 2009 | 2011 | author | 4.438992 | 2001 | 2008 | implication | 2.336646 | 2013 | 2013 |
medic | 2.404339 | 2009 | 2009 | cynic | 7.052629 | 2001 | 2007 | review | 1.823706 | 2013 | 2013 |
market | 1.957179 | 2009 | 2010 | base | 3.6586 | 2001 | 2002 | commit | 2.820585 | 2012 | 2013 |
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, W.; Khan, G.F.; Wood, J.; Mahmood, M.T. Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach. Sustainability 2016, 8, 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070631
Kim W, Khan GF, Wood J, Mahmood MT. Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach. Sustainability. 2016; 8(7):631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070631
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Woocheol, Gohar Feroz Khan, Jacob Wood, and Muhammad Tariq Mahmood. 2016. "Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach" Sustainability 8, no. 7: 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070631