Next Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods
Previous Article in Journal
How Exposure to ”Role Model” Projects Can Lead to Decisions for More Sustainable Infrastructure
Open AccessArticle

Effect of Urban Green Spaces and Flooded Area Type on Flooding Probability

Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Tan Yigitcanlar
Sustainability 2016, 8(2), 134;
Received: 28 November 2015 / Revised: 27 January 2016 / Accepted: 27 January 2016 / Published: 30 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)


Countermeasures to urban flooding should consider long-term perspectives, because climate change impacts are unpredictable and complex. Urban green spaces have emerged as a potential option to reduce urban flood risks, and their effectiveness has been highlighted in notable urban water management studies. In this study, flooded areas in Seoul, Korea, were divided into four flooded area types by cluster analysis based on topographic and physical characteristics and verified using discriminant analysis. After division by flooded area type, logistic regression analysis was performed to determine how the flooding probability changes with variations in green space area. Type 1 included regions where flooding occurred in a drainage basin that had a flood risk management infrastructure (FRMI). In Type 2, the slope was steep; the TWI (Topographic Wetness Index) was relatively low; and soil drainage was favorable. Type 3 represented the gentlest sloping areas, and these were associated with the highest TWI values. In addition, these areas had the worst soil drainage. Type 4 had moderate slopes, imperfect soil drainage and lower than average TWI values. We found that green spaces exerted a considerable influence on urban flooding probabilities in Seoul, and flooding probabilities could be reduced by over 50% depending on the green space area and the locations where green spaces were introduced. Increasing the area of green spaces was the most effective method of decreasing flooding probability in Type 3 areas. In Type 2 areas, the maximum hourly precipitation affected the flooding probability significantly, and the flooding probability in these areas was high despite the extensive green space area. These findings can contribute towards establishing guidelines for urban spatial planning to respond to urban flooding.
Keywords: urban flood; green space area; flooding probability; flooded area type; logistic regression analysis; cluster analysis urban flood; green space area; flooding probability; flooded area type; logistic regression analysis; cluster analysis

1. Introduction

Urbanization is a key driver that increases the frequency and intensity of urban flooding. Rapid sprawl in urban areas reduces green spaces and increases the amount of impervious surfaces, which can exacerbate flooding. Increases in impervious surfaces are known to significantly influence the hydrological cycle [1]. Moreover, decreases of evapotranspiration and reduced rainwater infiltration can increase average runoff and peak runoff amounts [2,3,4]. Consequently, flooding in urbanized areas often results in huge losses of life and property. Urban infrastructure in developing countries is outdated and not capable of mitigating the increased precipitation expected in some areas as a result of climate change. Therefore, it is important that cities design fundamental countermeasures to prevent damage from urban flooding.
The development of appropriate flood risk management strategies to flooding should consider long-term perspectives (e.g., expected future rainfall amounts, although climate change impacts can be unpredictable and complex) and aim to increase an area’s resilience to flooding. Recently, as rainfall has become more concentrated over short periods of time, substantial amounts of damage due to pluvial flooding have occurred in urban areas. This includes damage to social infrastructure, as well as losses of human life and property. Conventionally, storm water management has been focused on drainage systems via underground pipes. However, these conventional approaches have exceeded in many cases, because conventional approaches have been designed based on historical events. This makes it difficult to deal with extreme rainfall events that exceed the designated capacity. The frequency of extreme rainfall events is expected to increase with projected climate change, which may cause conventional stormwater management systems to be exceeded [5]. After several problems of conventional storm water management systems, there have been new efforts to study the effects of green spaces on urban storm water management [2].
The effects of urban green spaces on runoff have been studied in various fields [6,7,8]. Urban green spaces generally include parks, public green spaces, allotments, green corridors, street trees, urban forests, roof and vertical greening, private gardens and domestic gardens [9]. Increasing urban green spaces is considered to be an effective approach to reducing the adverse impacts of urbanization on the hydrological cycle [10,11]. Urban green spaces intercept water from the canopy and stem areas and enhance infiltration into the soil and root systems [12,13]. In other words, urban green spaces improve the retentiveness of hydrological systems in urban areas and dampen peak flows from storms that can lead to flooding.
Therefore, urban green space preservation and restoration should represent a potentially effective option to reduce urban flood risks, and its effectiveness has been highlighted in notable urban water management studies [14,15,16]. Expansion of urban green spaces is not only an economical and environmentally-friendly approach to dealing with storm water runoff and urban flooding, but can also improve the resiliency and sustainability of cities in many ways, such as by decreasing the susceptibility of cities to heat waves [17,18,19,20,21,22].
Effective mitigation of surface runoff with urban green spaces is highly dependent on the physical factors and characteristics present in different neighborhoods. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate how increases in urban green spaces will reduce surface runoff in different neighboring areas. Several studies have analyzed properties of flooded areas and categorized the flooded area type by regional factors, such as land use, imperviousness, slope and the Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) [23,24,25,26]. However, there is a dearth of quantitative studies that have analyzed the flood reduction effect achieved through the introduction of green spaces based on geomorphological characteristics.
The spatial patterns in urban areas require comprehensive study for accurate quantification of the effects of green spaces on the hydrological cycle. Specifically, it is necessary to understand the regional characteristics to maximize the effects of urban green spaces on flooding and thereby make cities more resilient to the impacts of climate change. In this study, a multivariate analysis technique was used to distinguish four different types of urban flooded areas in Seoul, Korea. Afterwards, the probability of urban flooding was statistically analyzed for each flooded area type, and the impact on flood probabilities from increased urban green space area was analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Scope

The Seoul Metropolitan City was used as the site for this study (Figure 1). Seoul is one of the most highly urbanized cities in Korea and therefore represents an ideal area to study urban flooding. The percentage of impervious area in the city of Seoul has increased from 40.0% in 1962 to 47.7% in 2010, and over 90% of the impervious land cover is impenetrable to rainwater infiltration. In addition, several residential areas and industrial facilities are located near the floodplains; thus, the risk of damage caused by urban flooding is heightened in this region [27].
Figure 1. Flood inundation map with topographic map of Seoul Metropolitan City, South Korea.
Figure 1. Flood inundation map with topographic map of Seoul Metropolitan City, South Korea.
Sustainability 08 00134 g001
Seoul experienced a heavy flood in 2011. Flooded areas during the event were distributed throughout Seoul, but damage was especially severe in Sadang, Seocho and Gangdong, compared to other parts of the city. Additionally, the southwestern part of Seoul, which has low elevation and gently sloping land, experienced severe damage from the flooding.
While the yearly total of hourly precipitation in Seoul has decreased recently, the maximum hourly precipitation has displayed an increasing trend; thus, it can be inferred that the rainfall intensity and continuous duration of heavy rainfall has increased, and these changes have primarily taken place during the summer. Consequently, Seoul may be more vulnerable to flooding in the future, and it would be prudent for officials to prepare for such situations, in part by implementing sustainable methods to increase flood resilience [28].
Urban flooding in this study is defined as a phenomenon that causes inconvenience to humans living in the flooded area or human injuries and various tangible and intangible property damage due to inundation of urban areas [28]. Urban green spaces in this study include forests, farmlands, grasslands, wetlands and other planted types of land, and green space data were derived from land cover maps and urban biotope maps of the region. These green spaces are considered to be critical to the natural water circulation system, as they represent areas where rainwater infiltrates and is retained. Low impact developments and green spaces, including artificial facilities (e.g., rainwater tanks, pervious paving), were excluded from the analyses. The amount of infiltrated water considered in this study includes not only rainwater that falls onto the green spaces, but also water that flows down through ground surface slopes, considered as water flow.
This study had two main objectives. First, types of urban flooded areas were divided into categories based on factors affecting the flooding; the groupings were determined by the use of cluster analysis, and discriminant analysis was performed to verify the cluster analysis results. As a result of the discriminant analysis data, the floods were divided into four types. The four flooded area types were then used as ground data in the analysis of green space features during the next research stage. Second, flood control contributions based on green space area and flooded area type were analyzed. In order to determine the relationship between green space area and flooding, the most adequate evaluation unit was selected, and regression formulas including this green space area variable were deduced. Afterwards, based on regression formulas for the different flooded area types, flooding probabilities for changes in the green space area were analyzed by taking only the green space area as the independent variable and fixing the other variables. The conceptual framework for this research is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Flow chart of this research.
Figure 2. Flow chart of this research.
Sustainability 08 00134 g002

2.2. Classification of Urban Flooded Area Type

2.2.1. Variable Selection

At first, 2000 points were extracted randomly from flooded areas based on a flood inundation map for 2011. Except for climate exposure variables that may change every year, variables were selected based on physical variables that have been shown to affect urban flooded regions in previous studies. Through analyses of the correlations between each variable before selection of the final variables, multicollinearity was observed, and variables with correlation coefficient values greater than 0.4 were excluded from further analyses. The variables that were finally selected for the flooded area type classification work included the presence of flood risk management infrastructure (FRMI), land use, slope, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) and soil drainage. Based on these variables, cluster analysis was performed. Dataset and materials for cluster analysis are as shown in Table 1.
FRMI is not a physical variable representing topographical features; instead, it is a dominant solution for preventing flood damage [29,30,31]. FRMI in this study includes pumping stations and rainwater retention tanks. In Seoul, it has been found that flooding rarely happens after FRMI has been installed in flood-prone areas. Land use also has a significant impact on the level of flooding, and in general, more vegetation density will decrease the tendency for flooding. Compared to forested areas, rainwater flows downward at a faster speed in non-vegetated areas during precipitation events [32,33]. TWI is often used to quantify topographic control on hydrological processes and is a function of both the slope and the upstream contributing area per unit width orthogonal to the flow direction [34]. Soil drainage is an index that reflects the amount of infiltrating rainwater, and it is an important variable for predicting flood occurrence.
Table 1. Dataset and materials for cluster analysis and logistic analysis. FRMI, flood risk management infrastructure.
Table 1. Dataset and materials for cluster analysis and logistic analysis. FRMI, flood risk management infrastructure.
VariablesDataSourceTypeCluster AnalysisLogistic Regression Analysis
Type 1Type 2Type 3Type 4
Presence of FRMIBasic plan of sewer line arrangementMinistry of Land Infrastructure and TransportationCategorical (Binary)
Green space areaUrban biotope mapSeoul Metropolitan CityContinuous
Detached housing areaCategorical (Binary)
Mixed land use area *Categorical (Binary)
Land use Categorical
SlopeDigital Elevation Map (DEM)National Geographic Information InstituteContinuous
Soil drainageDetailed soil mapRural Development AdministrationCategorical
Maximum hourly precipitation (mm)Automated Weather Station (AWS)Korea Meteorological AdministrationContinuous
* “Mixed land use area” is the block where residential and commercial buildings are over 30%, respectively.

2.2.2. Cluster Analysis and Verification

Two-stage cluster analysis [35] was performed by using the standard scores of major variables affecting the flooded area in Seoul, Korea. In the first stage, this method determines cluster numbers and central points of early clusters using the Ward method, which is a hierarchical cluster analysis technique. In the second stage, cases belonging to each cluster are determined by the K-means method, which is a sequential non-hierarchical cluster analysis technique. The two-stage method is advantageous in that it minimizes the effect of cases that have large separation level impacts at the time of using the hierarchical method for only cluster formation (i.e., it minimizes the impact of outliers). In addition, the K-means cluster analysis was judged to be suitable for this study, as it is capable of making meaningful analyses via changing numbers, even though the ultimate cluster number is determined by the researcher.
Discriminant analysis was performed in order to verify the results for flooded area types classified through this process. As discriminant variables are used to differentiate flooded areas, statistical validation for differences in the mean points of the flooded area types is important to consider. In addition, group features can be identified through the central points of functional groups and canonical discriminant function coefficients. Fisher’s linear discriminant function was deduced for each type, and then, by using these discrimination formulas, the results of the cluster analysis were re-classified. Cross-validation that applied relatively strict standards was used in this study. Arc-GIS 10.1 software was used to establish the dataset, and IBM SPSS 21.0 software was used for the cluster analysis.

2.3. Analysis of Flooding Probabilities Based on Green Space Area

Because the relationship between flood occurrences and factors that cause floods is explained multi-dimensionally, multivariate analysis and a logistic regression model were used. In particular, logistic regression analysis was used when working with a binary variable or category variable in which the dependent variable had a value of 0 or 1 (e.g., the flood occurrence status). Therefore, non-flooded areas were identified through the classification function by classified flooded area type. The independent variables were continuous and categorical. The result values of the model deduced by logistic regression analysis were represented as flooding probabilities between 0 and 1.
The use of a logistic regression analysis for forecasting flood occurrences is advantageous for several reasons. First, an assumption that the variance and co-variance matrices are identical is not required [36]; second, significance tests of coefficients can be conducted rather easily; and third, correlations between each variable and flood occurrences can be analyzed [37]. Lastly, independent variables can be selected via a repetitive selection and removal process during the establishment of the model, and the effect of other variables can be controlled in the model; this proved convenient for identifying the significant green space variables and environment factors that affected flood occurrences.
Flooded (1) and non-flooded (0) point variables were based on the four flooded area types. Random points of non-flooded area data were extracted and matched with the sample number according to each type based on the classification function being deduced at the time of the discriminant analysis. The green space variable represents “green space area within a radius of 100 m from the point”, and data were derived from a biotope map. Specifically, these data were calculated by aggregating absolute areas of green spaces within a 100-m radius from flooded and non-flooded points. As a result of establishing multiple logistic models with variables for green spaces within different distances from the point sources, it was determined that the accuracy of the model that contained green spaces within a radius of 100 m from the point was the highest. Maximum hourly precipitation data for each point were established through interpolation by the spline method using Arc-GIS 10.1 software and measurement data from Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs) for the city of Seoul.
Before deducing the model, green space features were observed by analyzing the current status of green space area for the city of Seoul and differences in the green space area for each type of flooded area. Finally, a model for analyzing flood probability change depending on green space area was deduced in a regression formula. To analyze the effect of green space area on flooding probability, other variables that affect flooding were fixed, then the flooding probability in each flooded area type was calculated. In the case of each fixed variable, where the minimum, average and maximum value for each variable was applied in the regression formula, flood probability depending on green space change was deduced according to the minimum, average and maximum values. The green space area and ratio required for reducing flooding probability were also considered by summarizing the data for the four types after performing an analysis with identical methods for each flooded area type.
The flood prediction model that was deduced through logistic regression analysis was verified via the Hosmer and Lemeshow (H&L) validation technique; contingency tables and the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve were also used. The results for verification with H&L statistics were deemed not statistically significant at a level of p > 0.05. Generally, when the area under the curve (AUC) value is greater than 0.7, the data from the model can be viewed as meaningful [38], and when the AUC value is greater than 0.8, the prediction accuracy can be regarded as high [39].

3. Results

3.1. Classification of Urban Flooded Area Type

First, as a result of observing the dendrogram from the hierarchical cluster analysis performed during the first stage of analysis, flooding was divided into four types. Data were also analyzed preliminarily according to three and five types of flooded areas through the non-hierarchical cluster analysis during the second stage, but the explanatory power and accuracy of the discriminant analysis results were optimal when four types of flooded areas were used.
Second, as a result of verifying the homogeneity of group averages, it was determined that the statistical probabilities for the variables, including land use, slope, TWI and presence of FRMI, were less than 0.001, and thus, these variables were very significant in the model; the average differences among variables for each of the four flooded area types were also significant. Larger F statistic values were associated with more discriminatory power, and the presence of FRMI had the largest discriminatory power among the five variables analyzed when these were used to divide the flooding into four types. The discriminatory powers for the other variables decreased in the order of the slope, TWI, soil drainage and land use.
Third, through the use of canonical discriminant function coefficients and central points of the functional groups, key characteristics of each group could be observed. One variable that contributed greatly to the division of Type 1 flooded area was the presence of FRMI. In the division of Type 2 and 4 flooded area, the slope variable made significant contributions to these groups, while TWI was a major factor for discriminating Type 3 flooded area. Canonical correlation at the relevant level between the discriminant function and groups was excellent, as indicated by the 0.996 correlation coefficient, and 98% of the total variance was explained by the model with an eigenvalue of 127.74.
Fourth, the clustered types were re-classified using the discrimination formulas. Fisher’s linear discriminant function that determines a discriminant score for each flooded area type was applied (Table 2). The discrimination accuracy rate as determined using a cross-validation technique was 98.1%. In the case of Type 1 flooded area, through the reclassification process performed by discriminant analysis, 459 places that had FRMI in place when flooding occurred were classified as Type 1, and the discrimination accuracy rate increased by 1.1%. Finally, among the total 1951 places where flooding occurred as analyzed in this study, 459 were classified as Type 1, 106 places as Type 2, 961 places as Type 3 and 425 places as Type 4.
Using the classification function (Table 1), the different types of flooded areas were mapped as shown in Figure 3.
Table 2. Fisher’s linear discriminant function.
Table 2. Fisher’s linear discriminant function.
Z1 (Type 1) = 4.624X1 + 0.812X2 – 0.113X3 + 1.972X4 + 111.569X5 − 76.389
Z2 (Type 2) = 7.064X1 + 0.930X2 + 2.842X3 + 1.373X4 + 7.806X5 − 42.109
Z3 (Type 3) = 4.594X1 + 0.689X2 + 0.467X3 + 2.134X4 − 0.716X5 − 22.455
Z4 (Type 4) = 5.104X1 + 0.706X2 + 0.892X3 + 1.104X4 − 1.731X5 − 14.716
* X1 = Soil drainage, X2 = Land use, X3 = Slope, X4 = TWI, X5 = Presence of FRMI
Figure 3. Green space and four types of flooded area through the discriminant function.
Figure 3. Green space and four types of flooded area through the discriminant function.
Sustainability 08 00134 g003

3.2. Physical Properties of Urban Flooded Area Types

Type 1 flooded areas represent regions where flooding occurred in a drainage basin that contained an FRMI. Specifically, this is a region where FRMIs had been installed because flooding had occurred frequently in the past. The average slope for these regions was 1.61%, which was gentler than the 2.51% average for total flooded regions in Seoul. The TWI in Type 1 areas was the second highest after the TWI in Type 3 areas and was higher than the average for all flooded regions. Soil drainage was imperfect in these regions, which is a regional characteristic factor for high flood risk. Compared to other drainage basins, the occurrence of flooding was significantly limited in general here, but at the time of extreme rainfall in 2011, flooding was excessive, as the capacities of the FRMIs were overwhelmed in this region. The Type 1 areas were mainly located around the Han River and major streams, and the mixed land use area ratio amounted to 45.5%, which was the highest among all four types. As semi-underground housing consisting of old brick structures is common in the Type 1 flooding areas, this region experienced heavy damage during the flood in 2011.
The average slope for Type 2 flooded areas was 14.06%, which was much steeper than the total area average (3.82%) for non-flooded areas in Seoul. The TWI value was relatively low here, and soil drainage was the most favorable among the four types. Landslides may be a concern for this area, given the steep gradients and vegetated hilly areas. Commercial, business and industrial areas were not present in this region. It was a place where water is prone to flow without attenuation, and hence, flooding did not occur frequently; when it did occur, inundated land in this region made up about 5% of the total flooded area in Seoul. These areas are bordered by mountainous terrain, and several newly-built detached houses are located here, along with many older brick houses. These structures are vulnerable to severe damage during intense discharge of water from the mountains to lower areas.
The average slope of Type 3 areas was 1.29%, which was the gentlest slope in the study areas, and the TWI was the highest among the four flooded area types. In addition, soil drainage was the worst compared to the overall average soil drainage of all flooded areas in Seoul. The ratio of detached housing area and mixed land use area was relatively high, and roads accounted for over 50% of the area. Type 3 areas had geographical conditions conducive to water attenuation, contrary to Type 2 flooded areas. Given the high TWI values, this region will be prone to future flooding if appropriate drainage systems are not installed.
The average TWI value for Type 4 flood areas was much lower than the total average of 10.42 for non-flooded areas, and slopes here were moderate. Soils drain imperfectly in this region, as indicated by the soil drainage data. In general, this area had several features that fell between the values for Type 2 and 3 areas; in comparison with all flood area types, the Type 4 area represents a place where the flooding probability can be expected to change considerably based on precipitation.
Statistical data for regional characteristic factors in each of the four types of flooded areas are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Statistic features of flooded area type.
Table 3. Statistic features of flooded area type.
TypeNDescriptionSoil DrainageSlopeTWIPresence of FRMILand Use
Type 1459Average2.611.6111.95Contained FRMIs (pumping station, rainwater retaining tank)Mixed land use area ratio is the highest
Located around river and streams
Coefficient of variation3.100.463.09
Type 2106Average3.4814.067.38NoneGreen space (forest) ratio is highest
No commercial, business and industrial areas
Coefficient of variation3.563.351.76
Type 3961Average2.321.2913.31NoneDetached housing and mixed land use area are relatively high
Road ratio is the highest
Coefficient of variation3.270.727.70
Type 4425Average2.583.915.98NoneLow hill area is highest
Coefficient of variation3.461.703.41
Total average in Seoul2.703.2210.75--
average in flooded area2.512.6311.07--
average in non-flooded area2.893.8210.42--

3.3. Analysis of Flooding Probability Based on Green Space Area

3.3.1. Characteristics of Green Spaces

Green spaces in the city of Seoul amount to 212.41 km2, taking up about 35% of the total area. Estimates of the green space area average within a 100-m radius from flooded and non-flooded areas in Seoul are shown in Table 4. The average green space ratio for flooded areas in Seoul city was 4.49%; for Type 1 flood areas, the green space ratio was 2.26%; and for Type 3 areas, the green space ratio was 2.81%, which are values that were below the average value for the city. For Type 2 flood areas, which border mountainous terrain, the green space ratio was 22.48%. The green space ratio within a 100-m radius in non-flooded areas in Seoul was 19.43%, which was very high.
Table 4. Average green space area average within a 100-m radius from flooded and non-flooded areas.
Table 4. Average green space area average within a 100-m radius from flooded and non-flooded areas.
DescriptionAverage of Green Space Area within a 100-m RadiusAverage of Green Space Area Ratio within a 100-m Radius
Non-flooded6102.20 m219.43%
Flooded1410.40 m24.49%
Flooded area Type 1709.78 m22.26%
Flooded area Type 27058.9 m222.48%
Flooded area Type 3881.36 m22.81%
Flooded area Type 41954.52 m26.23%

3.3.2. Flooded Area Type 1

For significant variables with the potential to affect the occurrence of floods in Type 1 flood areas, variables including the green space area, soil drainage, detached housing area and mixed land use area were selected as significant variables with the potential to affect the occurrence of floods in Type 1 flooded areas. The flooding probability will be decreased by increasing green space area and better soil drainage. According to the flooding probability model for Type 1 areas (Equation (1)), the probabilities of flooding in detached housing areas and mixed land use areas were 6.7-times and five-times higher than other areas, respectively.
Other variables affecting flooding included the TWI, slope and land use. As these were variables that were used in the previous cluster analysis to divide the study area into four types and because similar factors may be bound by each type, these variables were not selected as significant variables for the regression analysis. All of the variables were determined to be below the significance level of p < 0.05; hence, all such variables were statistically significant. The flooding probability was distributed from a maximum value of 94.19% (in areas where green space was non-existent, the drainage was very inferior and detached house was present) to a minimum value of 1% (Figure 4a). The relevant equation is as follows:
P(x) Type 1 = 0.499 − 0.116 green space area − 0.460 soil drainage + 1.614 mixed land use area + 1.896 detached housing area (AUC = 0.786)

3.3.3. Flooded Area Type 2

In Type 2 flood areas, green space area, slope and maximum hourly precipitation variables were selected as significant variables with the potential to affect flood occurrence. The estimated coefficient for all of the explanatory variables, except for the constant term, was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and more green space area was associated with a reduced occurrence of flooding in this region. During times of high maximum hourly precipitation and in areas with gentle slopes, flood occurrence was increased. The model seemed to yield reasonable results, and the observed accuracy was 91.4%, which was the highest accuracy among the deduced model of four flooded area types.
Type 2 was dominated by steep areas bordered by mountainous terrain. As mountain soil is rapidly saturated by regional torrential rains, debris flows occurred that contributed to the flooding. In the Type 2 area, detached houses are densely located in the lower part of the mountainous area, and serious damage is highly likely to occur here during future flooding events.
Figure 4. Flood probability analysis by change of green space area. (a) Type 1; (b) Type 2; (c) Type 3; (d) Type 4.
Figure 4. Flood probability analysis by change of green space area. (a) Type 1; (b) Type 2; (c) Type 3; (d) Type 4.
Sustainability 08 00134 g004
The flooding probability was distributed from a maximum value of 99.65% (where green space did not exist at all, the slope was minimum and maximum hourly precipitation was maximum) to a minimum value of 0% (Figure 4b). Flooding possibilities are minimized in the mountainous area with the steepest slopes according to the deduced function (2). The steepest areas in the Type 2 flooded area are not considered vulnerable to flooding, because those areas quickly withdraw the exceeded amount of rainfall to the neighboring gentle sloped areas. In cases where the maximum hourly precipitation reaches 87.77 mm, the flood probability is predicted to be greater than 95% regardless of whether green space is increased; thus, this is an area where floods are inevitable, under the current conditions, at times of extreme rainfall. The installation of flood control facilities, such as rainfall retention tanks, would be valuable in such areas. The relevant equation is as follows:
P(x) Type 2 = 0.048 − 0.083 green space area − 0.174 slope + 0.079 maximum hourly precipitation (AUC = 0.914)

3.3.4. Flooded Area Type 3

In Type 3 flood areas, green space area, TWI and detached housing area were selected as significant variables with the potential to affect flood occurrence. As the green space area expanded, the flooding probability decreased, and higher TWI values and more extensive detached housing areas were associated with an increase in flooding probability. The estimated coefficient of all variables was very significant (p < 0.005). The explanatory capability of this model was 70%.
The flooding probability was distributed from 75.92% to 0% (Figure 4c). The absolute estimated coefficient for green space area was the largest compared to the other types, and the variation of flood probability due to the change in the green space area was also the largest. The relevant equation is as follows:
P(x) Type 3 = −1.043 − 0.125 green space area + 0.086 TWI + 1.168 detached housing area (AUC = 0.702)

3.3.5. Flooded Area Type 4

In Type 4 flood areas, green space area, soil drainage and maximum hourly precipitation were selected as significant variables with the potential to affect flood occurrence. When the green space area expanded and the drainage was good, the flood occurrence probability decreased. Conversely, when the maximum hourly precipitation was high, the flood probability increased. All of the variables were very significant (p < 0.005). The explanatory capability of the model was 75.6%.
The flood probability was distributed from 96.04% to 0.52% (Figure 4d). In cases where the maximum precipitation was high and soil drainage was poor, the flood probability was greater than 60%, even when the green space area was at the maximum level. In this region, flood probability was mainly affected by heavy rainfall, and the maximum flood probability was associated with maximum hourly precipitation. The relevant equation is as follows:
P(x) Type 4 = −0.997 − 0.085 green space area + 0.048 maximum hourly precipitation − 0.486 soil drainage (AUC = 0.756)

4. Discussion

Flooding probability is shown to differ with the variation of green space area in each flooded area type. First, when comparing average values in the graph gradients (Figure 4) to explore the effects of green space according to each type of flooded area, it was found that Type 1 flooded areas were the most amenable to flood control through increased green space area, followed by Type 3, Type 4 and Type 2. However, while the average value of the gradient was the highest for Type 1, up to about 7000 m2 of green space area, the graph gradient of Type 3 was the highest among all of the areas. This means that compared to other flooded area type areas, the flood control capacity via green space is relatively large in Type 1 and 3 areas.
Sensitivity analysis of flooding probabilities through the green space area was performed based on Figure 4. Flooding probabilities for each flooded area type were changed by not only green space area, but also physical and environmental variables. Therefore, Figure 5 schematizes the difference between maximum and minimum of flooding probability due to green space area to show the scale of the sensitivity of flooding probability depending on the significant variables, except green space area. As a result, the sensitivity of flooding probability reduced as the green space area increased in all flooded area types. Moreover, in Type 3, a range of flooding probabilities due to green space area is the smallest among the four types in spite of other environmental variables’ change, that is Type 3 has low sensitivity, followed by Type 1, Type 4 and Type 2.
Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis between flooding probabilities.
Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis between flooding probabilities.
Sustainability 08 00134 g005
The Type 1 area, which is located in a drainage basin with an FRMI, was a flood-prone area before the FRMI was installed. Since the installation of a pumping station and a rainwater retention tank, the area has become less vulnerable to flood occurrences. It should be noted that in the case of no green space at all, the maximum value for the flood occurrence probability was the highest (73.48%) among the four types. In addition, the flood probability range, which went from a maximum of 73.48% to a minimum of 6.75%, was the greatest among the four types.
In Type 2 and 4 flood areas, when the maximum hourly precipitation was at the maximum level, the flood probability was greater than 60% despite changes in the green space variable; these represent areas where the maximum hourly precipitation significantly affects flood occurrence. Landslides are likely in this area, and these may be influenced by precipitation conditions, topography and geological features; landslides are apt to take place when external factors, such as rainfall impacts ground that has internal vulnerabilities [40,41]. Such a landslide occurred in the Woomyeonsan Mountains in 2011, resulting in 18 deaths, and was caused by flooding and the area’s unique geographical features. In the area bordering the mountains, it would be prudent to install flood control facilities, such as rainfall retention tanks, in addition to green spaces, to prevent future flooding.
On the other hand, in the case of Type 3 areas, there were small differences in the flooding probability according to the hourly maximum precipitation. The maximum hourly precipitation variable was not designated as a significant factor. Flooding probability for Type 3 was highly affected by TWI, green space area and the presence of housing rather than the distribution of precipitation. In particular, as flood occurrence was frequent in the detached housing area, mixed land use area, business area and roadway area, the flooding probability could be reduced effectively by introducing green spaces.
In the Type 3 flooded areas, the flooding probability was reduced to a minimum of 2.59% when the green space area in a 100-m radius is increased to the max. Compared to other types, it had the smallest probability values, and this is an area where the sensitivity to increases in green space area is high. When the green space area changed from 0 to 31,400 m2, the gradient mean value of flood probability for Types 2 and 4 was similar. However, it could be seen that in the case of Type 2, when the green space area was less than 6940 m2, it had a gentle gradient compared to Type 4, but at higher values, the graph gradient of Type 4 became gentler. Type 4 had intermediate geographical features between those of Type 2 and 3 and coexisted with Type 2 and 3 rather than achieving an independent existence in the model.
When observing the green space area of a place where the flooding probability was rapidly changing (inflection point), the inflection point occurred at 2380 m2 in the Type 3 area where the flood control effect based on the green space area was significant. The inflection point can be considered to be an area where the cost-effectiveness of flood control based on increases in green space area is the largest. The inflection point is identical to the green space area required for reducing the flooding probability by 50%.
The green space area required for reducing the flood probability to a 50% increase was in the order of Type 3, Type 4 and Type 2 areas. Specifically, for the Type 3 area, if 7.5% of the total area is converted to green space, the flood probability will be reduced to less than 50%, while in Type 4 and 2 areas, only when 10.3% and 21.7%, respectively, of the total area is covered with green space will the flood probability be reduced by half (Table 5).
Table 5. Comparison of average probability for each flooded area type.
Table 5. Comparison of average probability for each flooded area type.
TypeCoefficient of Green SpaceInflection Point of Green Space AreaGreen Space Area to Reduce 50% Flooding ProbabilityFlooding Probability (%)
Type 1−0.1168790 m28790 m2 (27.9%)73.486.7566.73
Type 2−0.0836790 m26790 m2 (21.7%)63.7411.4752.27
Type 3−0.1252380 m22380 m2 (7.5%)57.412.5954.82
Type 4−0.0853220 m23220 m2 (10.3%)56.828.3548.47
To reduce the size of the area within 10% the flooding probability band in Type 3 areas, i.e., to 47.41% from 57.41% when no green space is present at all, a green space area of 3205 m2 would be required, and this amount accounts for about 10% of the total area. Similarly, Type 2 would require a green space area of 4990 m2 in size, which would take up 16% of the total area, to reduce the top ranking 10% of flood probability (Table 6).
Table 6. Green space area and ratio to reduce flooding probability band.
Table 6. Green space area and ratio to reduce flooding probability band.
TypeDescription(Green Space Area to Reduce by)
Upper 10% ProbabilityUpper 20% ProbabilityUpper 30% ProbabilityUpper 40% Probability
Type 1 area (m2)4015758011,04014,700
ratio (%)12.7924.1435.1646.82
Type 2 area (m2)4990983014,95020,900
ratio (%)15.8931.3147.6166.56
Type 3 area (m2)3205650010,18014,840
ratio (%)10.2120.7032.4247.26
Type 4 area (m2)4730957015,04022,030
ratio (%)15.0630.4847.9070.16
We found that green spaces exerted a considerable influence on urban flooding probabilities in Seoul, Korea, and reductions in flooding were noted in several areas with greater amounts of green space. Moreover, different areas showed different sensitivities to the effects of green spaces, and flooding probabilities could potentially be reduced by more than 50%, depending on the amount of green space area and its introduced location. By [42], introduction of green spaces would be the best adaptation strategy for future flooding events through their use of a hedonic value evaluation method that considered the expansion of sewerage pipelines and construction of infiltration trenches. In a short-term perspective, expansion of sewerage pipelines may exert a significant influence on flood control, but in a long-term, sustainable and cost-effective perspective, increasing green spaces would represent an efficient way to control flood occurrences.
Green spaces were found to be more effective for decreasing flooding probabilities in Type 3 flood areas where the slope was gentle and the TWI was high, compared to Type 2 areas. This result is similar to one where it was found that creating green spaces such as street plantings in a concave rather than in a convex form by raising the elevation higher than surrounding roadways can be advantageous for reducing flooding by rainwater infiltration. In the case of reconstructing all green spaces in a community to a depth of 5 cm, it was found that runoff could be reduced by a maximum of 16% and the peak outflow by about 25% [5]. Concave-shaped green spaces could be interpreted in the same context as Type 3 green spaces. This could also be applied to location selections for small-scale gardens at the time of green space planning for entire urban areas.
In the case of Type 3, the average value of flooding probability was the largest, and this was the most flood-prone area included in this study. On the other hand, the effect of green spaces on the reduction of flooding probabilities was greatest in these areas. Generally, in flood-prone areas, installation of large-scale rainwater retention basins as a short-term solution is the preferred method to control flooding. In this study, we found that the green space area has the potential to reduce flooding probability by less than 50% in all flooded area types.
Some limitations were encountered. First, data were analyzed based on land cover maps and urban biotope maps. Hence, in this study, only green space area was used as a variable, but more detailed information on planting types or structures of green spaces would be useful for future analyses of the impacts of green spaces on urban flooding. Such information could be identified through site surveys. Second, flooded point data were established from a flood inundation map for 2011, so analysis was performed using only one year of data. The extracted flooded/non-flooded point for 10 years had many precipitation data because flooding often occurred in the same area. Therefore, it is difficult to use the logistic regression analysis. If points were extracted from more flood inundation maps over many years, the accuracy of the results could be higher. Third, the model was constructed based on the total area of the city of Seoul. However, if a site-based model could be constructed and supplemented after identifying detailed small green spaces through site surveys in the future, the applicability of the model could be further increased as more accurate data were incorporated.

5. Conclusions

A city resilient to disasters must establish appropriate flood control and adaptation plans. Recently, in Korea, there has been a strengthening of the role of urban planning in disaster control [43]. The application of diversified urban planning elements, including natural flood risk management and blue-green infrastructure, as well as existing physical sewer line systems, is required to ensure urban management with high resilience. Impervious land cover, such as asphalt and roofs in urban areas, is a key factor that affects flooding, and flood control plans that incorporate green spaces should be created. However, comprehensive studies of green spaces are required to understand how their implementation would affect water circulation in regional drainage basins.
In this study, flooded areas in Seoul were divided into four types by multivariate analysis techniques, and quantitative analyses were then performed to determine how the flooding probability changes with variations in the green space area. Through this study, green space area is suggested as a factor to reduce flooding probability according to the properties of the flooded area type. In addition, guidelines for increasing flood resilience were developed to assist with the spatial planning of green spaces as countermeasures for urban flooding.
In the case of artificial FRMI, such as rainwater retention basins, their value may decrease over time, but increasing the green space area is an eco-friendly solution that will benefit humans and nature over a long period of time. The role of existing green spaces is often limited to the production of ecological benefits for wildlife and aesthetically-pleasing landscapes for human residents, but functionally, proper design plans for green space locations could maximize their impact on flood control. Therefore, this study recommends that urban areas devote planning resources for green spaces, and such efforts should determine where the best areas are for their introduction.
It is expected that the approach used in this study and the results obtained will provide a framework for diverse research on green spaces in the future. Furthermore, the techniques employed may be useful for predicting flood probabilities in urban areas, i.e., the models, which were based on empirical data, had a high explanatory capability.


This work was supported by the BK 21 Plus Project in 2014 (Seoul National University Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Global leadership program towards innovative green infrastructure) and the Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute (KEITI) grant funded by the Korea government (ME) (No. 416-111-014). English editing and open access fee were supported by the Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed to the idea of the paper. Hyomin Kim. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Sunyong Sung contributed analysis tools and data. Dong-Kun Lee provided some core advice and checked through the whole paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Dreiseitl, H.; Geiger, W. Neue Wege furdas Regenwasser. In Handbuch zum Ruckhalt und zur Versickerung von Regenwasser in Baugebieten; Oldenbourg München: Munchen, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yao, L.; Chen, L.; Wei, W.; Sun, R. Potential reduction in urban runoff by green spaces in Beijing: A scenario analysis. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Paul, M.J.; Meyer, J.L. Streams in the urban landscape. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2001, 32, 333–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Whitford, V.; Handley, J.; Ennos, R. City form and natural process-indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 57, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, W.; Chen, W.; Peng, C. Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecol. Model. 2014, 291, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Armson, D.; Stringer, P.; Ennos, A.R. The effect of street trees and amenity grass on urban surface water runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seattle, C. The Effects of Trees on Stormwater Runoff; Puget Sound Partnership: Seattle, WA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Inkiläinen, E.N.M.; McHale, M.R.; Blank, G.B.; James, A.L.; Nikinmaa, E. The role of the residential urban forest in regulating throughfall: A case study in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 119, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cameron, R.W.F.; Blanuša, T.; Taylor, J.E.; Salisbury, A.; Halstead, A.J.; Henricot, B.; Thompson, K. The domestic garden—Its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban For. Urban Green. 2012, 11, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mentens, J.; Raes, D.; Hermy, M. Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century? Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 77, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, B.; Xie, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J. The economic benefits of rainwater-runoff reduction by urban green spaces: A case study in Beijing, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 100, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gill, S.E. Climate Change and Urban Greenspace. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2006; pp. 1–435. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, R.; Wang, J.-H.; Qu, J.-J.; Hu, X.-K.; Liu, H.-J. Landscape pattern and its dynamics in typical oasis-desert transitional zone of Minqin Region in 1960–2005. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2010, 21, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Natural England. Greater Manchester’s Green Infrastructure Next Steps towards a Green Infrastructure Framework Report to AGMA & Natural England. Available online:'s-Green-Infrastructure-Next-Steps-Towards-a-Green%20Infrastructure-Framework.pdf (accessed on 29 January 2016).
  15. Ellis, J.B. Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2012, 56, 24–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Everett, G.; Lawson, E.; Lamond, J. Handbook on Green Infrastructure: Planning, Design and Implementation; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. Benedict, M.A.; Mcmahon, E.E.T. Green infrastructure: Smart conservation for the 21st century. Renew. Resour. J. 2002, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  18. Foster, J.; Lowe, A.; Winkelman, S. The Value of Green Infrastructure for Urban Adaptation; The Center for Clean Air Policy: Washington, D.C, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sjöman, J.D.; Gill, S.E. Residential runoff—The role of spatial density and surface cover, with a case study in the Höjeå river catchment, southern Sweden. Urban For. Urban Green. 2014, 13, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gill, S.E.; Handley, J.F.; Ennos, A.R.; Pauleit, S. Adapting cities for climate change: The role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ. 2007, 33, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mell, I.C. Can green infrastructure promote urban sustainability? Proc. ICE Eng. Sustain. 2009, 162, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Benedict, M.A.; McMahon, E.T. Green Infrastructure Linking Landscapes and Communities; Island Press: Washington, D.C., USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee Problems and Improvement Directions of Repetitive Flood Hazard Areas. Planning and Policy. Korea Res. Inst. Hum. Settl. 2004, 273, 16–23. (In Korean)
  24. National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA). A Study on the Integrated Countermeasures for Repetitive Flooded Areas; National Emergency Management Agency: Abuja, Nigeria, 2005.
  25. Park, C.Y.; Shin, S.Y.; Son, E.J. Analyzing the Reduction of Runoff and Flood by Arrangements of Stormwater Storage Facilities. J. Korean Soc. Water Environ. 2013, 29, 45–54. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  26. The Seoul Institute. Construction of Flooded Area Management System in Seoul; The Seoul Institute: Seoul, Korea, 2002. (In Korean)
  27. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Basic Safety Plan of Seoul Metropolitan City; Seoul Metropolitan Government: Seoul, Korea, 2014. (In Korean)
  28. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Basic Rainwater Management Plan of Seoul Metropolitan City; Seoul Metropolitan Government: Seoul, Korea, 2013. (In Korean)
  29. Mount, J.F. California Rivers and Streams: The Conflict between Fluvial Processes and Land Use; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  30. Philippi, N.S. Floodplain Management: Ecologic and Economic Perspectives; Landes Company: Austin, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  31. Smits, A.J.M.; Nienhuis, P.H.; Saeijs, H.L.F. Changing Estuaries, Changing Views. Hydrobiologia 2006, 565, 339–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kang, W.; Koh, I.; Park, C.; Lee, D. An Analysis of Changes in Forest Fragmentation and Morphology in Surrounding Landscapes of Maeulsoops and Jinan-gun. Korean J. Environ. Eol. 2012, 26, 941–951. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  33. Tehrany, M.S.; Pradhan, B.; Mansor, S.; Ahmad, N. Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena 2015, 125, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sørensen, R.; Zinko, U.; Seibert, J. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: Evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 10, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. Grimm, L.G.; Yarnold, P.R. Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics, 1st ed.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, S.; Sambath, T. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ. Geol. 2006, 50, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, S.Y. Prediction of Hotel Bankruptcy Using Multivariate Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2006, 30, 53–75. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  38. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M. Modeling of species distribution with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evalutation. Ecograpy 2008, 31, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yilmaz, I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat—Turkey). Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35, 1125–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, K.S.; Kim, W.Y.; Chae, B.G.; Cho, Y.C. Engineering Geologic Characteristics of Landslide Induced by Rainfall-Boeun, Chungcheong Buk-do. J. Korean Soc. Eng. Geol. 2000, 10, 163–174. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
  41. Yoon, D.H.; Koh, J.H. A Study on Analysis of Landslide Disaster Area using Cellular Automata: An Application to Umyeonsan, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, Korea. J. Korea Spat. Inf. Soc. 2012, 20, 9–18. (In Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, Q.; Panduro, T.E.; Thorsen, B.J.; Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. Adaption to extreme rainfall with open urban drainage system: An integrated hydrological cost-benefit analysis. Environ. Manag. 2013, 51, 586–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Korea Planning Association. Our Territories and Cities, Are They Safe? Report of the 3rd Policy Forum; Korea Planning Association: Seoul, Korea, 2014. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
Back to TopTop