Next Article in Journal
Influence of Tillage Practices and Crop Type on Soil CO2 Emissions
Next Article in Special Issue
New Key Performance Indicators for a Smart Sustainable City
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Arrangements as a Form of Ecological Modernization: The Case of the US Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grants
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Land Use on Availability of Japanese Freshwater Resources and Its Significance for Water Footprinting
Open AccessFeature PaperCommentary

EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase

Department of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Sustainable Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2016, 8(1), 92;
Received: 30 September 2015 / Revised: 6 January 2016 / Accepted: 13 January 2016 / Published: 18 January 2016
The ongoing pilot phase of the European Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) tests the PEF method and develops product category-specific rules (PEFCRs) for selected product categories. The goal of PEF is to address all relevant environmental impacts and the full life cycle of products is acknowledged. However, PEF faces several methodological and practical challenges. This paper presents key findings of a comprehensive analysis of the current status of the PEF pilot phase (mainly based on the evaluation of all draft PEFCRs). Remaining key challenges are: (1) the still open goal and policy outcome of the PEF process; (2) the difficult applicability and, thus, the unclear tangible added value of some PEF rules compared to current life cycle assessment (LCA) practice; (3) the insufficient maturity level of some predefined impact assessment methods and missing reliable methods for prioritizing impact categories; and (4) the fact that, in the worst case, the developed PEFCRs may not support a fair comparability of products. This “mid-term review” of the PEF pilot phase shows that the PEF method and the PEFCRs need to be further improved and refined for a successful policy implementation of PEF, but also for avoiding that unsolved issues of PEF affect the LCA method as such. View Full-Text
Keywords: Product Environmental Footprint; PEF; pilot phase; LCA; ISO 14044; comparability; policy Product Environmental Footprint; PEF; pilot phase; LCA; ISO 14044; comparability; policy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lehmann, A.; Bach, V.; Finkbeiner, M. EU Product Environmental Footprint—Mid-Term Review of the Pilot Phase. Sustainability 2016, 8, 92.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop