Next Article in Journal
A Methodological Comparison between Energy and Environmental Performance Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainability of Water Safety Plans Developed in Sub-Saharan Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Urban Land Expansion and Structural Change in the Yangtze River Delta, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
GIS Based Measurement and Regulatory Zoning of Urban Ecological Vulnerability
Article

Is the “Ecological and Economic Approach for the Restoration of Collapsed Gullies” in Southern China Really Economic?

1
Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process of the Ministry of Education, College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
2
School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
3
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 5825 University Research Court, Suite 1200, College Park, MD 20740, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vincenzo Torretta
Sustainability 2015, 7(8), 10308-10323; https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810308
Received: 6 July 2015 / Revised: 20 July 2015 / Accepted: 24 July 2015 / Published: 31 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Resources)
Collapsed gully erosion constantly plagues the sustainability of rural areas in China. To control collapsed gully erosion, an ecological and economic approach, which uses tree plantation to gain economic benefits and control soil erosion, has been widely applied by local governments in Southern China. However, little is known about the economic feasibility of this new method. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and economic benefits of the new method. Based on a case study in Changting County, Southeast China, two farms were selected to represent a timber tree plantation and a fruit tree plantation, respectively. The Annual Capital Capitalization Method and Return on Investment (ROI) were selected to conduct cost-benefit analysis. In contrast to previous studies, we found that the new approach was far from economic. The value of the newly-built forestland in Sanzhou Village and Tufang Village is 2738 RMB ha−1 and 5477 RMB ha−1, respectively, which are extremely lower than the costs of ecological restoration. Meanwhile, the annual ROI is −3.60% and −8.90%, respectively, which is negative and also far poorer than the average value of forestry in China. The costs of conservation were substantially over the related economic benefits, and the investors would suffer from greater loss if they invested more in the conservation. Low-cost terraces with timber trees had less economic loss compared with the costly terraces with fruit tree plantation. Moreover, the cost efficiency of the new approaches in soil conservation was also greatly poorer than the conventional method. The costs of conserving one ton soil per year for conventional method, new method for planting timber trees, and planting fruit trees were 164 RMB, 696 RMB, and 11,664 RMB, respectively. Therefore, the new collapsed gully erosion control methods are uneconomic and unsuitable to be widely carried out in China in the near future. View Full-Text
Keywords: economic feasibility; cost-benefit analysis; collapsed gully erosion; environmental conservation economic feasibility; cost-benefit analysis; collapsed gully erosion; environmental conservation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, Q. Is the “Ecological and Economic Approach for the Restoration of Collapsed Gullies” in Southern China Really Economic? Sustainability 2015, 7, 10308-10323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810308

AMA Style

Wang C, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Yang Q. Is the “Ecological and Economic Approach for the Restoration of Collapsed Gullies” in Southern China Really Economic? Sustainability. 2015; 7(8):10308-10323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810308

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chengchao, Yaoqi Zhang, Yecheng Xu, and Qichun Yang. 2015. "Is the “Ecological and Economic Approach for the Restoration of Collapsed Gullies” in Southern China Really Economic?" Sustainability 7, no. 8: 10308-10323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810308

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop