Next Article in Journal
Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Footprint of Cities: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research
Previous Article in Journal
Teaching Scenario-Based Planning for Sustainable Landscape Development: An Evaluation of Learning Effects in the Cagliari Studio Workshop
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Water Footprint of Agriculture in Duero River Basin
Article

Unlocking the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” of Corporate Water Stewardship in South Africa—Exploring Corporate Power and Legitimacy of Engagement in Water Management and Governance

Water and Development Research Group, Aalto University, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
Academic Editor: Arjen Y. Hoekstra
Sustainability 2015, 7(6), 6893-6918; https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066893
Received: 6 March 2015 / Revised: 19 May 2015 / Accepted: 21 May 2015 / Published: 28 May 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Footprints and Sustainable Water Allocation)
Corporate water stewardship, i.e., proactive water-using corporate engagement in water management and governance, has been hailed as a solution to global water challenges. However, it has also aroused criticism and skepticism, as it has been feared to lead to private securitization of resources and institutional capture especially in locations with weak public institutions and regulation. This article tackles this “prisoner’s dilemma” of corporate water stewardship by exploring when and how it is legitimate considering the private nature of corporations and their power to change water management and governance processes and their outcomes. An analytical framework is constructed based on a literature review and applied into a case-study of corporations active in water stewardship initiatives in South Africa. The case-study findings suggest that the stewardship agenda would benefit from (1) a more open acknowledgement of power asymmetries between corporations and other parties; (2) more careful and systematic evaluation and enhancement of legitimacy of corporations to engage in public good and common pool water resources in the first place; and (3) stewardship actions should support stronger public institutions and especially civil society to equally participate. The research community is called in to scrutinize and facilitate the multi-actor water governance processes, which include corporations to assist in the effort. View Full-Text
Keywords: corporate water stewardship; water management; water governance; corporate power; legitimacy; South Africa corporate water stewardship; water management; water governance; corporate power; legitimacy; South Africa
MDPI and ACS Style

Sojamo, S. Unlocking the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” of Corporate Water Stewardship in South Africa—Exploring Corporate Power and Legitimacy of Engagement in Water Management and Governance. Sustainability 2015, 7, 6893-6918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066893

AMA Style

Sojamo S. Unlocking the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” of Corporate Water Stewardship in South Africa—Exploring Corporate Power and Legitimacy of Engagement in Water Management and Governance. Sustainability. 2015; 7(6):6893-6918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066893

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sojamo, Suvi. 2015. "Unlocking the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” of Corporate Water Stewardship in South Africa—Exploring Corporate Power and Legitimacy of Engagement in Water Management and Governance" Sustainability 7, no. 6: 6893-6918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066893

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop