Next Article in Journal
On the Non-Compliance in the North Sea Cod Stock
Next Article in Special Issue
A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Complex Triangular Cells for the Evaluation of CO2 Emissions by Individuals instead of Nations in a Scenario for 2030
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transport Pathways for Light Duty Vehicles: Towards a 2° Scenario
Open AccessArticle

Accounting for the Ecological Footprint of Materials in Consumer Goods at the Urban Scale

1
Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 8410501, Israel
2
School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2013, 5(5), 1960-1973; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5051960
Received: 6 February 2013 / Revised: 13 April 2013 / Accepted: 26 April 2013 / Published: 2 May 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Cities)
Ecological footprint analysis (EFA) can be used by cities to account for their on-going demands on global renewable resources. To date, EFA has not been fully implemented as an urban policy and planning tool in part due to limitations of local data availability. In this paper we focus on the material consumption component of the urban ecological footprint and identify the ‘component, solid waste life cycle assessment approach’ as one that overcomes data limitations by using data many cities regularly collect: municipal, solid waste composition data which serves as a proxy for material consumption. The approach requires energy use and/or carbon dioxide emissions data from process LCA studies as well as agricultural and forest land data for calculation of a material’s ecological footprint conversion value. We reviewed the process LCA literature for twelve materials commonly consumed in cities and determined ecological footprint conversion values for each. We found a limited number of original LCA studies but were able to generate a range of values for each material. Our set of values highlights the importance for cities to identify both the quantities consumed and per unit production impacts of a material. Some materials like textiles and aluminum have high ecological footprints but make up relatively smaller proportions of urban waste streams than products like paper and diapers. Local government use of the solid waste LCA approach helps to clearly identify the ecological loads associated with the waste they manage on behalf of their residents. This direct connection can be used to communicate to citizens about stewardship, recycling and ecologically responsible consumption choices that contribute to urban sustainability. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban sustainability; ecological footprint analysis; life cycle assessment; material consumption; waste management urban sustainability; ecological footprint analysis; life cycle assessment; material consumption; waste management
MDPI and ACS Style

Kissinger, M.; Sussman, C.; Moore, J.; Rees, W.E. Accounting for the Ecological Footprint of Materials in Consumer Goods at the Urban Scale. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1960-1973.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop