Next Article in Journal
Reclaim “Education” in Environmental and Sustainability Education Research
Previous Article in Journal
Consistent Aggregation of Generalized Sustainable Values from the Firm Level to Sectoral, Regional or Industry Levels
Open AccessArticle

An Assessment of Thailand’s Biofuel Development

School of Environment, Resources and Development (GNESD Member Centre), Asian Institute of Technology, P. O .Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
Global Network on Energy for Sustainable Development (GNESD), UNEP Risø Centre, Denmark Technical University, DTU Management Engineering, Frederiksborgvej 399, Building 142, Roskilde 4000, Denmark
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2013, 5(4), 1577-1597;
Received: 2 March 2013 / Revised: 2 April 2013 / Accepted: 3 April 2013 / Published: 15 April 2013
The paper provides an assessment of first generation biofuel (ethanol and biodiesel) development in Thailand in terms of feedstock used, production trends, planned targets and policies and discusses the biofuel sustainability issues—environmental, socio-economic and food security aspects. The policies, measures and incentives for the development of biofuel include targets, blending mandates and favorable tax schemes to encourage production and consumption of biofuels. Biofuel development improves energy security, rural income and reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but issues related to land and water use and food security are important considerations to be addressed for its large scale application. Second generation biofuels derived from agricultural residues perform favorably on environmental and social sustainability issues in comparison to first generation biofuel sources. The authors estimate that sustainably-derived agricultural crop residues alone could amount to 10.4 × 106 bone dry tonnes per year. This has the technical potential of producing 1.14–3.12 billion liters per year of ethanol to possibly displace between 25%–69% of Thailand’s 2011 gasoline consumption as transportation fuel. Alternatively, the same amount of residue could provide 0.8–2.1 billion liters per year of diesel (biomass to Fischer-Tropsch diesel) to potentially offset 6%–15% of national diesel consumption in the transportation sector. View Full-Text
Keywords: biofuel; ethanol; biodiesel; Thailand; policy; sustainability; GHG emissions; biofuel; ethanol; biodiesel; Thailand; policy; sustainability; GHG emissions;
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, S.; Salam, P.A.; Shrestha, P.; Ackom, E.K. An Assessment of Thailand’s Biofuel Development. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1577-1597.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop