Next Article in Journal
Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Biodiversity Risk in the US: A Spatial Econometric Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
‘Sufferings Start from the Mothers’ Womb’: Vulnerabilities and Livelihood War of the Small-Scale Fishers of Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Psychological Response of the American People to Oil Depletion and Declining Energy Return on Investment (EROI)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling Evacuate versus Shelter-in-Place Decisions in Wildfires
Correction published on 18 July 2012, see Sustainability 2012, 4(7), 1645-1646.
Open AccessArticle

The Unsustainable Trend of Natural Hazard Losses in the United States

1
Department of Geography & Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
2
Digital Sandbox Inc., 8260 Greensboro Drive #450, McLean, VA 22102, USA
3
Hazards & Vulnerability Research Institute, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2011, 3(11), 2157-2181; https://doi.org/10.3390/su3112157
Received: 10 October 2011 / Revised: 26 October 2011 / Accepted: 28 October 2011 / Published: 14 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disaster Risk Reduction and Sustainable Development)
In the United States, direct losses from natural hazards are on the rise with hurricanes, flooding, and severe storms contributing about three quarters of the total damages. While losses from severe storms have been stable over the past fifty years, hurricane and flood losses have tripled. Per capita losses are also increasing showing that impacts outpace population growth with high per capita losses occurring largely in the Southeast and Midwest. If the loss escalation of the past two decades continues into the future, then direct losses of $300 to $400 billion within a single decade are possible. In order to reverse this trend, sustainable development, vulnerability reduction, and hazard mitigation must become priorities and current loss reduction efforts need to be evaluated and re-assessed in terms of their effectiveness. These conclusions are drawn from the analysis of spatial and temporal trends in direct losses from natural hazards using SHELDUSTM data from 1960 through 2009. Loss data are adjusted for inflation, population, and wealth to capture both trends in total losses and per capita losses. The loss data are then compared to disaster-related federal government and private insurance expenditures. View Full-Text
Keywords: natural hazards; losses; hazard mitigation; United States; severe weather; climate change; resilience natural hazards; losses; hazard mitigation; United States; severe weather; climate change; resilience
MDPI and ACS Style

Gall, M.; Borden, K.A.; Emrich, C.T.; Cutter, S.L. The Unsustainable Trend of Natural Hazard Losses in the United States. Sustainability 2011, 3, 2157-2181.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop