Next Article in Journal
Building Carbon Management Capacity: The Hawaiʻi Carbon Knowledge Exchange
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Day-Ahead Scheduling Optimization of a Wind–Solar Coupled Hydrogen DC Microgrid with Hybrid Energy Storage Considering Electrolyzer Lifetime
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Effect of Catalyst Loading on the DOC + SCR Coupled System of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine

1
China Classification Society Shanghai Branch, Shanghai 200135, China
2
Shanghai Marine Diesel Engine Research Institute, Shanghai 200000, China
3
College of Automotive and Energy Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(7), 3438; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073438
Submission received: 25 February 2026 / Revised: 20 March 2026 / Accepted: 24 March 2026 / Published: 1 April 2026

Abstract

DOC coupled with SCR represents a key technological approach for reducing gaseous pollutant emissions from diesel engines. Based on engine bench testing using a light-duty diesel engine as a prototype, this study investigates the impact of DOC coupled with SCR at different catalyst loadings on diesel engine emission characteristics. Results indicate that higher DOC loadings lead to greater exhaust backpressure losses, with a maximum pressure difference reaching 4.3 kPa. The temperature difference across the DOC was minimally affected by catalyst loading. Higher DOC loading enhanced catalytic activity toward CO and THC. At medium-to-low loads, this effect was pronounced, while at high loads, the influence of catalyst loading diminished. Higher DOC loading enhances NO oxidation capacity. Under external characteristic conditions, elevated engine exhaust temperatures maximize post-DOC NO2 formation, increasing post-DOC NO2 production by over 100%. These findings provide useful guidance for optimizing diesel aftertreatment systems to achieve a better balance between pollutant reduction, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability, thereby supporting the sustainable development of cleaner diesel engine technologies.

1. Introduction

Diesel engines are widely used in commercial vehicles and off-road applications due to their high thermal efficiency, reliability, and power output [1]. On the other hand, diesel vehicle exhaust emissions pose significant pollution concerns. According to China’s Annual Report on Mobile Source Environmental Management [2], diesel vehicles emitted 961,000 tons of CO, 140,000 tons of HC, 4,040,000 tons of NOX, and 45,000 tons of particulate matter (PM). These figures represent 14.4%, 8.1%, 78.3%, and over 90.0% of total automotive emissions, respectively. It is evident that diesel vehicles constitute the primary source of NOX and PM emissions among atmospheric pollutants [3], posing significant risks to human health [4]. Consequently, China has established stringent emission regulations to control pollutant discharges from diesel vehicles [5,6]. Faced with increasingly rigorous emission standards, relying solely on in-engine purification technologies proves insufficient [7], making exhaust aftertreatment systems an essential technology for reducing diesel engine pollutant emissions [8].
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology utilizes a catalyst to selectively react with NOx in an ammonia (NH3) reduction atmosphere, producing non-toxic and pollution-free N2 and H2O, making it the most effective method for reducing diesel engine NOX emissions [9]. Its primary reaction processes include standard reactions and rapid reactions [10]. Among these, the rapid reaction represents the most efficient pathway for SCR catalytic NOX reduction. This reaction relies heavily on the NO2 proportion within the NOX mixture, achieving peak conversion efficiency when the NO:NOX ratio reaches 1:1. Consequently, increasing the NO2/NOX ratio in diesel exhaust effectively enhances SCR catalytic efficiency.
The Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) typically consists of cordierite or a metal substrate coated with precious metal catalysts (such as Pt and Pd), primarily promoting the oxidation of CO, hydrocarbons, and NO. It should be noted that nitrogen oxides (NOX) emitted by diesel engines are predominantly NO, accounting for approximately 85–95% of total NOX under most operating conditions. Therefore, the Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) is essential upstream of the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system, as it oxidizes NO to NO2, thereby increasing the NO2/NOX ratio and enabling the fast SCR reaction pathway. Simultaneously, the oxidation reaction releases heat, elevating exhaust temperature and further boosting SCR efficiency. The DOC primarily consists of four components: the housing, vibration-damping layer, carrier, and catalyst. The catalyst serves as the core element, with active components mainly comprising precious metals such as Pt and Pd. Research indicates that DOCs can elevate the NO2/NOX ratio in diesel exhaust to 60–70%. The oxidation performance of DOCs can be enhanced by optimizing catalyst formulations and structural parameters [11]. Research by Zhong [12] and Lou [13], among others, indicates that DOC geometric and structural parameters significantly affect oxidation performance. In general, longer DOCs exhibit superior oxidation capabilities for CO, THC, and NO, while carrier material, mesh size, and wall thickness also influence oxidation behavior to varying degrees. In addition, the oxidation performance of Pt-based catalysts is closely related to the catalyst activity state and Pt dispersion. Shi [14] reported that non-thermal plasma synergistic regeneration can reconstruct the performance of Pt catalysts, thereby improving their catalytic oxidation capability. Therefore, the oxidation performance of DOC is affected not only by structural design parameters but also by the physicochemical state of the active catalyst components. The study by Florcher P [15] shows that honeycomb ceramic carriers with high pore density and thin walls have the characteristics of low exhaust resistance and large reaction area, which helps to improve the activity of catalysts. Khosravi et al. [16] studied the reaction kinetics models of CO, NO, and C3H6 oxidation reactions in DOC using two catalyst formulations, Pt and Pt:Pd (4:1). The results showed that the catalyst with Pd added had higher catalytic activity and higher conversion efficiency for CO and THC. Beyond carrier material and structural parameters, the loading amount of DOC exerts a more pronounced effect on oxidation performance. Lou et al. [17] observed that increasing precious metal loading reduced the ignition temperatures of CO and THC. Ge et al. [18] found that higher precious metal loading improved the catalyst’s low-temperature activity.
Xiang et al. [19] found that coupling DOC with SCR can significantly reduce HC, CO, NOX, NH3, and N2O emissions in ammonia/diesel dual fuel engines. The main reason for this is that DOC oxidizes HC and CO and converts NO to NO2, thereby optimizing the SCR inlet exhaust composition and improving denitrification efficiency. Lyu et al. [20] investigated a typical Chinese Stage VI heavy-duty diesel engine equipped with DOC and SCR, revealing enhanced durability against N2O emissions. Jung et al. [21] emphasized the importance of selecting appropriate catalysts for effective N2O reduction, noting that vanadium dioxide catalysts demonstrated superior efficacy in suppressing N2O formation compared to zeolite and copper-zeolite catalysts. Hu et al. [22] found that the DOC + SCR integrated post-treatment system can effectively reduce gaseous and particulate emissions under both steady-state and transient conditions. The emission reduction mechanism is mainly attributed to the oxidation of unburned components and soluble organic matter by DOC, as well as the synergistic regulation of the SCR reaction environment. Sun et al. [23] observed that the synergistic effect of DOC and SCR reduces the graphitization degree of particulate matter (PM), with higher exhaust temperatures yielding lower graphitization levels. Sun et al. [24] demonstrated that the “DOC + SCR” system exhibits strong robustness in controlling pollutant emission levels during purification. Particularly under high-speed and high-load conditions, CO concentrations approached 0 ppm for most of the time after catalytic treatment.
Reviewing the current state of domestic and international research, most existing studies focus on the DOC as a standalone component, investigating how parameter variations affect diesel engine emission characteristics. Research on the intercoupling relationships among exhaust aftertreatment components is scarce, failing to provide clear guidance on how aftertreatment systems influence diesel engine emission performance.
This study will investigate the effects of DOC coupled with SCR at different catalyst loadings on diesel engine emission characteristics based on engine bench testing. The anticipated findings are expected to provide guidance for optimizing diesel engine exhaust aftertreatment systems.

2. Test System and Methods

2.1. Test System

Figure 1 presents a schematic diagram of the engine dynamometer test system. The system mainly consists of a Kaimai electric dynamometer (Kaimai (Luoyang) Electromechanical Co., Ltd., Luoyang, China), a Tocell fuel consumption meter (Shanghai Tocell Engine Testing Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and auxiliary bench equipment, including a coolant temperature control system, an engine oil temperature control device, an engine data acquisition unit, and an air filter. The main emission measurement instruments include a MEXA-1600D gaseous analyzer (HORIBA, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), an EEPS-3090 particle size analyzer (TSI Incorporated, Shoreview, MN, USA), and a Dekati DI-2000 ejector diluter (Dekati Ltd., Kangasala, Finland). The bench control console communicates with the dynamometer, fuel consumption meter, emission measurement system, and various sensors to coordinate test operation and record the corresponding data.

2.2. Engine Specifications

The test engine was a light-duty diesel engine with a displacement of 1.91 L, an in-line four-cylinder configuration, and turbocharging with intercooling. Its main technical specifications are listed in Table 1.

2.3. Test Exhaust Aftertreatment System

The test exhaust aftertreatment system consists of a DOC coupled with an SCR unit. The DOC employs three different catalyst loading levels, while the coupled SCR unit maintains fixed parameters. In this study, precious metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 were selected to represent low, medium, and high loading levels, respectively, for investigating the variation in emission characteristics of the DOC + SCR coupled system over a typical loading range. DOC-specific technical parameters are detailed in Table 2. When the engine exhaust enters the exhaust pipe, a certain amount of urea solution is sprayed into the exhaust pipe by the urea injection device. The urea solution is atomized under high temperature, undergoes hydrolysis and pyrolysis reactions, and generates ammonia gas (NH3) required for the reduction reaction [25]. Under the action of the catalyst, NOX is selectively reduced to nitrogen gas. The urea-SCR system can be equipped with DOC at the front end of the SCR catalyst to achieve rapid SCR reaction, thereby improving the conversion rate of NOX [26,27]. Due to the secondary pollution caused by NH3 escape caused by the installation of NH3-SCR, the technical solution of optimizing the urea injection strategy and installing ASC (Ammonia Slip Catalyst) catalyst to oxidize excess NH3 to generate N2 has attracted the attention of various host factories [28]. Specific technical parameters of SCR are shown in Table 3.

2.4. Test Conditions

Two typical operating conditions were selected: external characteristic and load characteristic. The specific parameters are shown in Table 4.
(1)
External characteristic condition: The test engine operates at full load across a speed range from 1000 r/min to 3200 r/min. Test speeds are selected at 200 r/min intervals, resulting in 12 external characteristic test points.
(2)
Load Characteristic Test Conditions: Based on the engine’s external characteristic test data, the maximum torque speed is 2000 r/min and the rated speed is 3200 r/min. Load levels corresponding to 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of full load at each respective speed were selected as load characteristic test points.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Exhaust Backpressure and Exhaust

The exhaust back pressure measured in the experiment is mainly determined by the physical properties of the catalyst structure, including coating thickness and pore characteristics, which are dominated by the total load. In this experimental batch, the total load is proportional to PGM, and the two change synchronously. Figure 2 shows the effect of DOC-coupled SCR with different catalyst loadings on exhaust back pressure. According to Figure 2a,b, under external characteristic conditions, the exhaust pressure difference before and after DOC shows a fluctuating trend of first increasing, then decreasing, and then increasing again with the increase in rotational speed. This change is mainly influenced by the exhaust flow velocity and device flow resistance. As the rotational speed increases, the exhaust flow rate increases, and the friction loss in the DOC + SCR system increases, resulting in an overall increase in back pressure level [29]. At the same time, under the same carrier structure conditions, the loading of precious metals increased from 25 g/ft3 to 60 g/ft3, resulting in an increase in catalyst coating amount and a decrease in effective flow cross-sectional area. Therefore, the exhaust pressure difference in DOC + SCR No. 3 at all speeds was higher than that of DOC + SCR Nos. 1 and 2.
Under load characteristic conditions (Figure 2c,d), the exhaust pressure difference before and after DOC increases monotonically with increasing load at 2000 r/min and 3200 r/min and reaches its maximum value at 100% load. At this time, the maximum pressure difference in DOC + SCR with noble metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 was 3.3, 3.6, and 4.3 KPa, respectively, indicating that the influence of noble metal loadings on system flow resistance is more significant under high exhaust flow conditions.
Overall, the variation in exhaust back pressure is mainly determined by the engine operating conditions, and the loading of precious metals has a secondary but stable effect on the back pressure level by changing the characteristics of the catalyst coating. The increase in back pressure may have adverse effects on the engine ventilation process, thereby forming certain constraints on the combustion process under high load conditions. Although the present study mainly focused on the effects of DOC loading on exhaust backpressure and emission characteristics, the increase in exhaust flow resistance may also influence the turbocharger operating condition, intake air flow, exhaust gas temperature, and fuel consumption. Therefore, the results reported in this study are primarily intended to reflect the relative differences in outlet pollutant concentrations and NO2/NOx composition among different DOC loading levels under the tested operating conditions. These coupled effects should be further considered in future studies when comprehensively evaluating the effectiveness of different catalyst loading levels.
Figure 3 shows the effect of DOC-coupled SCR with different noble metal loadings on exhaust temperature characteristics. Under the external characteristic condition, the temperature difference between the front and rear exhaust of the DOC shows a fluctuating trend of first increasing, then decreasing, and then increasing again with the increase in speed. At 1200 r/min, the maximum temperature difference in DOC + SCR with precious metal loads of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 is 55 °C, 51 °C, and 56 °C, respectively. This fluctuation mainly reflects the comprehensive effect between the change in exhaust temperature and the heat release intensity of catalytic oxidation. When the loading of precious metals increases, the temperature difference actually decreases. This is because the transport rate of reactants limits the reaction rate. Even if more precious metals are added to the catalyst, the pollutants that can participate in the reaction will not significantly increase. Therefore, the heat release tends to be saturated, and the change in ΔT is not significant. A higher total load will increase the thickness of the washcoat and increase the thermal capacity of the catalyst. This means that the catalyst absorbs more heat, while the temperature peak transferred from the exhaust to the SCR is slightly weakened, which may result in a slight decrease in ΔT with increasing PGM.
Under load characteristic conditions, the temperature difference before and after DOC monotonically increases with increasing load at 2000 r/min and 3200 r/min and reaches its maximum value at 100% load. Correspondingly, the maximum temperature differences at 2000 r/min are 25 °C, 45 °C, and 45 °C, respectively, while at 3200 r/min they are 29 °C, 43 °C, and 52 °C, respectively. This indicates that as the load increases, the oxidation reactions of CO, THC, and NO intensify, and the exothermic effect gradually becomes dominant.
Overall, under the same carrier structure conditions, the increase in temperature difference on DOC is related to the enhanced oxidation activity of the catalyst. A higher PGM load promotes the oxidation of NO to NO2, and the generated NO2 can further participate in the oxidation of carbonaceous substances, including particulate matter, which is an exothermic process. This additional oxidation heat helps to observe an increase in DOC exhaust temperature. Increasing the loading of precious metals can enhance the oxidation activity of DOC, resulting in higher temperature rise levels under various load conditions. At the same time, the overall temperature difference at rated speed is higher than the maximum torque speed, indicating that under high-speed conditions, the influence of exhaust thermal state and reaction intensity on temperature rise is stronger than the heat loss effect inside the device [30].

3.2. Gaseous Emission Characteristics

Figure 4 shows the temperature-dependent characteristics of CO conversion rates for different DOC samples. It can be seen that as the temperature increases, the conversion rates of CO by the three types of DOC gradually increase, but due to the different loading amounts of precious metals, their temperature rise curves show significant differences. The conversion curve of DOC No. 1 is the smoothest, reaching only 10% conversion rate at 150 °C, and then slowly increasing with temperature. The conversion rate of DOC 2 reached 10% at 143 °C, and its heating response was slightly faster than that of DOC 1. In contrast, DOC No. 3 exhibits significantly low-temperature ignition characteristics, achieving a conversion rate of 10% at 114 °C and complete conversion of CO at 157 °C. Correspondingly, the ignition temperatures T50 of DOC 1, 2, and 3 are 168, 161, and 128 °C, respectively, and the complete conversion temperatures T90 are 185, 169, and 136 °C, respectively, indicating that DOC 3 has the highest reaction rate in the low, medium, and high temperature ranges.
The results shown in Figure 5 indicate that the oxidation performance of CO by DOC with different catalyst loadings is mainly influenced by the combined effects of exhaust temperature and airspeed characteristics. Under external characteristic conditions, as the speed increases, the CO emissions before DOC decrease, mainly due to the increase in exhaust temperature, which makes combustion more complete. Under these conditions, the inlet temperature of the DOC has reached the CO ignition range, indicating that all three sets of DOC exhibit high CO oxidation efficiency. The average conversion rates of DOC with noble metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 at various speeds reach 62.7%, 72.0%, and 92.6%, respectively, indicating that increasing the noble metal loading can significantly enhance CO oxidation activity.
At the same time, as the rotational speed increases, the exhaust flow rate and carrier air velocity increase, and the residence time of gas in the catalyst shortens, gradually shifting the CO oxidation reaction from temperature control to kinetic limitation, resulting in a decrease in the apparent oxidation efficiency of DOC with increasing rotational speed. In contrast, higher loading of precious metals can maintain higher CO conversion capacity under high altitude conditions by providing more active sites.
Under load characteristic conditions, at 2000 r/min and 3200 r/min, as the load increases, the CO emissions before DOC show a decreasing trend, reflecting the enhancement of combustion temperature and oxidation environment. Correspondingly, the average oxidation efficiency of CO by DOC with precious metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 under different loads was 52.5%, 60.5%, and 80.7%, and 52.5%, 59.9%, and 68.8%, respectively. Among them, in the low load range, due to the lower exhaust temperature, CO oxidation relies more on the intrinsic activity of the catalyst, and the noble metal loading DOC shows a more significant conversion advantage; In the high load range, temperature factors dominate, and the differences between different load levels are relatively reduced.
Figure 6 shows the effect of DOC-coupled SCR with different noble metal loadings on THC emission characteristics. Under the external characteristic conditions, there is no obvious pattern of THC emissions before DOC changing with speed, while all three sets of DOC show high THC oxidation efficiency. Among them, the average conversion rates of DOC with noble metal loading of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 at each speed reach 78.6%, 83.4%, and 88.9%, respectively, indicating that increasing the noble metal loading can enhance the oxidation activity of DOC towards THC.
As the rotational speed increases, the apparent oxidation efficiency of DOC towards THC gradually decreases, mainly due to the increase in exhaust flow rate and carrier air velocity, which shortens the residence time of gas in the catalyst and limits the reaction process kinetically. Under load characteristic conditions, the pre-DOC THC emissions of the engine decrease with increasing load at 2000 r/min and 3200 r/min, reflecting the enhancement of combustion temperature and oxidation environment. Correspondingly, under the condition of 2000 r/min, the average oxidation efficiency of THC by DOC with noble metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 was 62.3%, 66.2%, and 74.2%, respectively; At 3200 r/min, the average oxidation efficiencies of DOC 1, 2, and 3 were 43.6%, 56.4%, and 61.0%, respectively.
But as the engine speed increases, the exhaust gas temperature rises due to the increase in combustion frequency and the accumulation of heat release per unit time. The increase in cylinder and exhaust temperatures enhances the integrity of fuel oxidation, thereby reducing the formation of incomplete combustion products such as CO and THC at the engine output position. In addition, higher exhaust temperatures promote the oxidation of CO and unburned hydrocarbons in the cylinder and exhaust manifold before reaching the DOC. This thermally driven oxidation process becomes more effective at higher engine speeds, further contributing to the observed reduction in CO and THC emissions before DOC.
Overall, the catalytic oxidation performance of DOC on THC is determined by the noble metal loading, exhaust temperature, and airspeed characteristics. Increasing the loading of precious metals can significantly improve the THC conversion capacity under low load and high airspeed conditions, while under high load conditions, temperature factors dominate and the efficiency differences between different loading levels are relatively reduced.
Figure 7 shows the NOX emission characteristics under external characteristic conditions. From Figure 7a, it can be seen that the pre-DOC NOX emissions of the engine show a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with increasing engine speed. Although the measured NOX concentration after the DOC + SCR system decreases by 10.3%, 15.7%, and 17.6% at various engine speeds, this result should be interpreted as the overall response of the coupled aftertreatment system rather than a direct indication that the DOC itself removes total NOX efficiently. From Figure 7b, it can be seen that the engine NOX is mainly composed of NO, accounting for over 90%. Its trend with the change in engine speed is consistent with the total amount of NOX. After DOC, NO decreases by 15.6%, 33.0%, and 28.6%, respectively. This suggests that the main role of the DOC is to promote the oxidation of NO to NO2, thereby changing the NO/NO2 distribution at the SCR inlet and further influencing the overall NOX conversion behavior of the coupled system.
From Figure 7c,d, it can be seen that DOC significantly promotes the conversion of NO to NO2, and with the increase in precious metal loading, the production of NO2 and its proportion in NOX significantly increase. Among them, the production of NO2 increases by 105.6%, 210.8%, and 113.8% respectively, and the proportion of NO2 increases by 5.1%, 18.3%, and 12.0% respectively. In the range of 1000–2000 r/min, the generation rate of NO2 accelerates, mainly due to the decrease in CO and THC emissions, which weakens its competition with NO on the active sites of the catalyst and makes NO oxidation reaction more likely to occur [31].
When the speed is further increased to 2000–3200 r/min, although the exhaust temperature increases, the rate of NO2 generation actually decreases, even lower than the pre-DOC level. This phenomenon may be related to the shortened gas residence time in the catalyst at high engine speeds, together with the combined effects of NO oxidation and NO2 consumption/decomposition related reactions, which limit the increase in NO2 formation under these conditions.
Figure 8 shows the NOX emission characteristics under different load conditions at 2000 r/min. From Figure 8a, it can be seen that the NOX emissions before DOC of the engine increase with an increase in load. The change in NOX emissions before and after DOC is not significant under medium and low loads. However, under high load conditions, with the increase in precious metal load, the NOX emissions after DOC show a more obvious decreasing trend.
As shown in Figure 8b, NO emissions increase with increasing load. Under low to medium load conditions, the emission reduction effect of DOC on NO is limited, and even slightly increased. Under high load conditions, the reduction in NO emissions is significantly enhanced. At 100% load, DOC with precious metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft 3 showed a decrease of 33.3%, 40.1%, and 39.4% in NO emissions, respectively. This is mainly related to the lower exhaust temperature under low load, which is not conducive to the NO oxidation reaction.
As shown in Figure 8c,d, NO2 emissions increase with increasing load, and their proportion in total NOX shows a trend of decreasing first and then increasing with load. At 100% load, the production of NO2 after DOC with noble metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 increased by 86.0%, 157.6%, and 111.8%, respectively, indicating that the NO oxidation process becomes more favorable under relatively high-load and high-temperature conditions. At the same time, the non-monotonic variation with load suggests that the NO2 response is also affected by the combined influence of catalytic activity, reactant competition, and residence time, rather than by temperature alone.
Figure 9 shows the NOX emission characteristics under different load conditions at 3200 r/min. As shown in Figure 9a, the NOX emissions before DOC of the engine increase with the increase in load. Under high load conditions, with the increase in precious metal load, the NOX emissions after DOC show a relatively decreasing trend. Under some low load conditions, there is a slight increase in NOX after DOC, which is due to the partial oxidation of NO to NO2 under lower exhaust temperature conditions. In this operating range, the SCR catalyst has not yet entered the high-efficiency operating temperature window, and DOC mainly changes the composition of NOX rather than reducing its total amount, resulting in a slight increase in the measured NOX concentration. With the increase in load and exhaust temperature, the NO2 generated by DOC effectively promotes the rapid SCR reaction pathway, significantly improving the NOX conversion efficiency. Under these conditions, NO2 is rapidly consumed by the SCR catalyst, and the positive effect of DOC promoting NO oxidation on the overall denitrification performance dominates.
As shown in Figure 9b, NO emissions increase with increasing load. Under low to medium load conditions, the emission reduction effect of DOC on NO is limited and even slightly increases. Under high load conditions, the reduction in NO emissions shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. At 75% load, the reduction in NO after DOC with precious metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 is 20.1%, 36.4%, and 38.4%, respectively. This is mainly related to the lower exhaust temperature and limited NO oxidation reaction under low load.
As shown in Figure 9c,d, the emissions of NO2 and its proportion in NOX both show a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with increasing load. At 75% load, the production of NO2 after DOC with noble metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 increased by 46.6%, 56.4%, and 88.0%, respectively, indicating that under medium to high load conditions, exhaust temperature and catalytic activity jointly promote the conversion of NO to NO2, while at higher loads, this process gradually becomes limited by reaction equilibrium and shortened residence time.

4. Conclusions

This study employed an engine test bench using a 1.91 L light-duty diesel engine to investigate the effects of DOC coupled with SCR at different catalyst loading levels on diesel engine emission characteristics. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
Under the same substrate geometry and coating structure, increasing the DOC loading generally leads to higher exhaust backpressure under most operating conditions, indicating that higher catalyst loading increases system flow resistance. Under load characteristic conditions, the maximum pressure differences in the DOC + SCR system with catalyst loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3 reached 3.3, 3.6, and 4.3 kPa, respectively, at 100% load. In contrast, no obvious monotonic relationship was observed between the DOC temperature rise and catalyst loading, suggesting that the DOC temperature difference is mainly governed by engine operating conditions and exhaust thermal state.
(2)
Higher DOC loading enhances the oxidation activity toward CO and THC. The 60 g/ft3 DOC showed the highest CO and THC conversion capability over the tested conditions, while the influence of catalyst loading was more significant at medium-to-low loads and became less pronounced at high loads.
(3)
Higher DOC loading enhances NO oxidation capacity. Under external characteristic conditions, elevated engine exhaust temperatures maximize NO2 formation after the DOC. At 2000 r/min, the amount of NO2 produced after the DOC increased by 86.0%, 157.6%, and 111.8% for precious metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3, respectively. At the rated speed of 3200 r/min, the amount of NO2 produced after the DOC increased by 46.6%, 56.4%, and 88.0% for precious metal loadings of 25, 40, and 60 g/ft3, respectively.
(4)
From a practical application perspective, the selection of DOC loading should consider not only oxidation performance and exhaust flow resistance, but also the potential catalyst cost and the possible influence on engine fuel consumption. Although 60 g/ft3 provides the strongest oxidation activity for CO and THC, it also results in the highest backpressure penalty and requires a higher catalyst coating amount. Considering emission improvement and system penalty together, the 40 g/ft3 DOC exhibits the best overall balance under the tested operating conditions and can be regarded as a more practically favorable catalyst loading in this study. In applications where oxidation activity is prioritized over cost and flow resistance, a higher loading, such as 60 g/ft3, may still be preferred.
Overall, increasing the DOC precious metal loading improves the oxidation of CO, THC, and NO, although the effect depends strongly on engine operating conditions. More importantly, the results suggest that appropriate catalyst loading optimization can help achieve a better balance among pollutant reduction, exhaust backpressure, catalyst utilization, and fuel economy. Therefore, optimizing DOC loading in DOC-SCR systems is beneficial not only for improving diesel emission control performance but also for supporting the sustainable development of cleaner and more efficient diesel engine technologies. Since this study was conducted only on a single light-duty diesel engine under typical steady-state conditions, further work is still needed on transient validation, catalyst characterization, long-term durability, and DOC-SCR synergistic optimization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.; Methodology, S.L. and Y.Z.; Formal analysis, T.S., K.L. and Y.Z.; Resources, Y.S.; Data curation, Y.S.; Writing—original draft, S.L., T.S., K.L. and Y.Z.; Writing—review and editing, T.S. and Y.Z.; Supervision, Y.S.; Project administration, K.L.; Funding acquisition, T.S. and K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project (202503AA080021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lyu, L.; Wang, J.; Yin, H.; Ji, Z.; Tan, J.; Hao, L.; Ge, Y. Accelerated aging for after-treatment devices of diesel engine: Method, emission characteristics, and equivalence. Appl. Energy 2024, 355, 122234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Ji, Q.; Wang, X.; Ao, C. Experimental study on performance and emission characteristics of non-road methanol/diesel dual-fuel engine with after-treatment system at full loads. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 376, 124486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Lou, D.; Tan, P.; Hu, Z.; Fang, L. Particles, compositions and particle mass spectrometry emission characteristics with biodiesel and diesel exhaust after-treatment system. Energy 2025, 315, 134488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, Y.; Hou, D.; Luo, Y.; Kaiqi, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ding, Z.; Cai, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. Degradation of particulate matter utilizing non-thermal plasma: Evolution laws of morphological micro-nanostructure and elemental occurrence state. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 114772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, X.; Huang, J.; Lei, X.; Yue, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Yu, H.; Ding, S. Advanced NOx Emission Modeling for Diesel Trucks: Incorporating Exhaust Temperature and Load Dynamics. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2025, 17, 102703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, B.; Wang, W.; Guo, S.; Zhan, Q.; Yao, C. A comparative study on combustion and emissions between diesel and diesel methanol dual fuel modes under different loads. Fuel 2026, 407, 137572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Liang, R.; Huang, X.; Wang, P.; Li, Z.; Yu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, D.; Cai, Y.; et al. Temperature window of NTP-assisted DPF regeneration and evolution mechanism of PM physicochemical properties. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2026, 293, 130507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Okeleye, S.A.; Thiruvengadam, A.; Besch, M.C.; Pradhan, S.; Carder, D. Performance characterization of a selective catalytic reduction on filter aftertreatment system in a heavy-duty diesel engine tested on a laboratory dynamometer. J. Energy Inst. 2023, 110, 101330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, T.; Yang, B.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y. Luenberger-sliding mode observer based backstepping control for the scr system in a diesel engine. Energies 2019, 12, 4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, Z.; Guan, B.; Zhuang, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Z.; Hu, X.; Zhu, C.; Zhao, S.; Shu, K.; et al. Review on solid selective catalytic reduction (SSCR) technology: Excellent optimization of selective catalytic reduction technology. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2025, 15, 647–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, Q.; Ye, J.; Kang, Z. Optimization of diesel oxidation catalyst for enhanced emission reduction in engines. Energy 2024, 290, 130152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhong, C.; Gong, J.; Wang, S.; Tan, J.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, G. NO2 catalytic formation, consumption, and efflux in various types of diesel particulate filter. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 20034–20044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lou, D.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y. Modeling and Analysis on Emission Characteristics of Light-Duty Diesel Engine After-Treatment System Based on Neural Network; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shi, Y.; Cheng, D.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; Wang, P.; Li, Z.; Jiang, J. Non-thermal plasma synergistic regeneration for Pt catalyst performance reconstruction. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2025, 112246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Flörchinger, P.; Ortiz, M.G.; Ingram-Ogunwumi, R. Comparative Analysis of Different Heavy Duty Diesel Oxidation Catalysts Configurations; SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1419; SAE: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khosravi, M.; Abedi, A.; Hayes, R.; Epling, W.; Votsmeier, M. Kinetic modelling of Pt and Pt: Pd diesel oxidation catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 154, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.; Lou, D.; Sun, Y.; Tan, P.; Hu, Z.; Huang, C. Effects of DOC and CDPF Catalyst Composition on Emission Characteristics of Light-Duty Diesel Engine with DOC + CDPF + SCR System; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ge, M.Y. Numerical Simulation of Precious Metal Catalysts for Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) in Diesel Engines. Master’s Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. Xiang, P.; Liu, J.; Zhao, W.; Ji, Q.; Ao, C.; Wang, X.; Sun, P.; Wang, X.; Li, Z. Experimental investigation on gas emission characteristics of ammonia/diesel dual-fuel engine equipped with DOC + SCR aftertreatment. Fuel 2024, 359, 130496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lyu, L.; Sun, W.; Feng, P.; Wang, H.; Hao, L.; Tan, J.; Wang, X.; Song, C.; Li, H.; Li, Z.; et al. NH3 and N2O emission durability of the heavy-duty diesel engine with DOC, DPF, SCR, and ASC through the accelerated aging method. Fuel 2023, 339, 126950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jung, Y.; Pyo, Y.; Jang, J.; Woo, Y.; Ko, A.; Kim, G.; Shin, Y.; Cho, C. Nitrous oxide in diesel aftertreatment systems including DOC, DPF and urea-SCR. Fuel 2022, 310, 122453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, J.; Liao, J.; Hu, Y.; Lei, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhong, J.; Yan, F.; Cai, Z. Experimental investigation on emission characteristics of non-road diesel engine equipped with integrated DOC + CDPF + SCR aftertreatment. Fuel 2021, 305, 121586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, Y.; Qian, Y.; Gong, Z.; Sun, Z. Catalytic effect of DOC + SCR aftertreatment system based on ship exhaust conditions. Trans. CSICE 2025, 43, 72–78. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sun, Y.; Qian, Y.; Gong, Z.; Meng, S.; Wei, X.; Ma, B. The impact of energy flow on catalytic behavior in advanced DOC + SCR emission control systems. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2025, 143, 663–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yim, S.D.; Kim, S.J.; Baik, J.H.; Nam, I.S.; Mok, Y.S.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, B.K.; Oh, S.H. Decomposition of urea into NH3 for the SCR process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 4856–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koebel, M.; Elsener, M.; Kleemann, M. Urea-SCR: A promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines. Catal. Today 2000, 59, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gieshoff, J.; Schäfer-Sindlinger, A.; Spurk, P.C.; Tillaart, J.A.A.v.D.; Garr, G. Improved SCR Systems for Heavy Duty Applications; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. Brodrick, C.J.; Farsh-Chi, M.; Dwyer, H.A.; Sperling, D.; Gouse, S.W.; Doelling, W.; Hoelzer, J.; Jackson, M. Urea-SCR System Demonstration and Evaluation for Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kutkut, A.; Gao, Z.; Toops, T.; Li, H. An experimental and numerical investigation of HD diesel engine DOC efficiency in oxidizing NO to NO2. Fuel 2026, 409, 137784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, F.; Kong, W. Experimental investigation of operating characteristics and thermal balance of a miniature free-piston linear engine. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 178, 115608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, F.; Zhu, W.; Wen, J.; Liu, H.; Xiong, T.; Yi, H.; Zhao, S.; Tang, X. Novel SCR catalyst derived from Mn@ Yeast materials: Insight to covalent MnCN roles and NH3 activation on coordination sites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 655, 159625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the engine dynamometer test system.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the engine dynamometer test system.
Sustainability 18 03438 g001
Figure 2. Variation in DOC pressure drop under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loadings.
Figure 2. Variation in DOC pressure drop under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loadings.
Sustainability 18 03438 g002
Figure 3. Variation in DOC temperature rise under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loading levels.
Figure 3. Variation in DOC temperature rise under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loading levels.
Sustainability 18 03438 g003
Figure 4. Temperature rise curve of the CO conversion rate.
Figure 4. Temperature rise curve of the CO conversion rate.
Sustainability 18 03438 g004
Figure 5. CO emission characteristics before and after the DOC + SCR system under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loading levels.
Figure 5. CO emission characteristics before and after the DOC + SCR system under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loading levels.
Sustainability 18 03438 g005
Figure 6. THC emission characteristics before and after the DOC + SCR system under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loading levels.
Figure 6. THC emission characteristics before and after the DOC + SCR system under external and load characteristic conditions at different catalyst loading levels.
Sustainability 18 03438 g006
Figure 7. Variations in NOX, NO, NO2, and NO2/NOX ratio before and after the DOC + SCR system under external characteristic conditions.
Figure 7. Variations in NOX, NO, NO2, and NO2/NOX ratio before and after the DOC + SCR system under external characteristic conditions.
Sustainability 18 03438 g007
Figure 8. Variations in NOX, NO, NO2, and NO2/NOX ratio before and after the DOC + SCR system under different load conditions at 2000 r/min.
Figure 8. Variations in NOX, NO, NO2, and NO2/NOX ratio before and after the DOC + SCR system under different load conditions at 2000 r/min.
Sustainability 18 03438 g008
Figure 9. Variations in NOX, NO, NO2, and NO2/NOX ratio before and after the DOC + SCR system under different load conditions at 3200 r/min.
Figure 9. Variations in NOX, NO, NO2, and NO2/NOX ratio before and after the DOC + SCR system under different load conditions at 3200 r/min.
Sustainability 18 03438 g009
Table 1. Technical specifications of the test engine.
Table 1. Technical specifications of the test engine.
Intake SystemForced Induction with Intercooler
Engine configurationDual overhead camshaft
Bore × stroke (mm)80 × 92
Compression ratio18.1
Displacement (L)1.91
Maximum power output (kW)75
Maximum torque speed (r/min)2000
Maximum torque (N·m)250
Rated speed (r/min)3200
Table 2. Experimental DOC technical parameters.
Table 2. Experimental DOC technical parameters.
ProjectNO. 1NO. 2NO. 3
Pore density (cpsi)300300300
Carrier diameter (mm)144144144
Carrier length (mm)118118118
Aspect ratio0.820.820.82
Volume (L)1.921.921.92
Wall thickness (mil)555
Carrier materialCordieriteCordieriteCordierite
Coating materialγ-Al2O3γ-Al2O3γ-Al2O3
Micro pore diameter (μm)1–101–101–10
Median value of micropores (μm)1–41–41–4
Specific surface area (m2·g−1)120–180120–180120–180
Precious metal loading capacity (g·ft−3)254060
Precious metal componentsPt/Pd/RhPt/Pd/RhPt/Pd/Rh
Proportion of precious metals5:1:05:1:05:1:0
Table 3. SCR system parameters.
Table 3. SCR system parameters.
ProjectSystem Parameters
Pore density (cpsi)300
Carrier diameter (mm)144
Carrier length (mm)150
Aspect ratio1.04
Volume (L)2.44
Wall thickness (mil)5
Coating materialTiO2-based coating
Micro pore diameter (μm)5–20
Median value of micropores (μm)8–12
Carrier materialHoneycomb ceramics
Catalyst typeV2O5-WO3/TiO2
V2O5 content (wt%)1.2
WO3 content (wt%)6
Catalyst loading (g/L)140
SCR active temperature window (°C)200–500
Table 4. Operating conditions for external and load characteristic tests.
Table 4. Operating conditions for external and load characteristic tests.
Speed (r/min)Loading (%)
1000100
1200100
1400100
1600100
1800100
2000100
2200100
2400100
2600100
2800100
3000100
3200100
200010
200025
200050
200075
2000100
320010
320025
320050
320075
3200100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Su, Y.; Shen, T.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y. Study on the Effect of Catalyst Loading on the DOC + SCR Coupled System of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073438

AMA Style

Li S, Su Y, Shen T, Li K, Zhang Y. Study on the Effect of Catalyst Loading on the DOC + SCR Coupled System of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine. Sustainability. 2026; 18(7):3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shengjun, Yi Su, Teng Shen, Ke Li, and Yunhua Zhang. 2026. "Study on the Effect of Catalyst Loading on the DOC + SCR Coupled System of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine" Sustainability 18, no. 7: 3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073438

APA Style

Li, S., Su, Y., Shen, T., Li, K., & Zhang, Y. (2026). Study on the Effect of Catalyst Loading on the DOC + SCR Coupled System of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine. Sustainability, 18(7), 3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073438

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop