5.1. Summer Simulation Results Analysis
The summer wind environment simulations were conducted for the two-story “Yikeyin” building under two different conditions in the PHOENICS software. The wind speed, humidity, and temperature result contours for the first floor (left) and the second floor (right) are shown below. As per
Section 3.2.3, observation points are: a (outdoor entrance), b (courtyard center), c (first-floor room), d (second-floor room).
The analysis of the results revealed that in different areas of the building environment:
- (1).
Smaller wind speeds were associated with higher relative humidity and higher temperatures.
- (2).
Larger skywell dimensions led to higher wind speeds inside the building, resulting in lower temperatures and lower humidity levels.
However, due to the relatively mild wind conditions (breeze environment), the effect of skywell size on the internal temperature and humidity was limited. This indicates that while the size of the skywell does influence the temperature and humidity levels, its impact is not as significant in the context of the building’s overall ventilation capacity.
Therefore, adequate ventilation is essential during the summer months to prevent stuffiness and ensure a more comfortable indoor environment. Enhancing airflow can help mitigate the effects of high humidity and temperature, which are more pronounced in areas with reduced ventilation.
5.1.1. Evaluation of the First-Floor Room
Based on the data analysis from
Table 4, the environmental parameters of the first-floor room showed variations under different conditions.
Under Condition 1, the average wind speed was 0.015 m/s, with a fluctuation range of 0.005 m/s to 0.030 m/s. The average relative humidity was 79.96%, fluctuating between 69.41% and 87.63%. The average temperature was 28.28 °C, with a fluctuation range of 24.74 °C to 30.62 °C. In Condition 2, the average wind speed increased to 0.030 m/s, with a fluctuation range of 0.010 m/s to 0.040 m/s. The average relative humidity decreased slightly to 78.56%, fluctuating between 68.03% and 87.02%. The average temperature slightly decreased to 27.83 °C, with a fluctuation range of 25.54 °C to 31.95 °C.
From the data, it can be observed that under Condition 2, compared to Condition 1, the wind speed significantly increased in the mild breeze environment, while relative humidity decreased, which is consistent with the principle that higher wind speeds reduce relative humidity when air humidity is high during the summer. Additionally, the larger the size of the natural ventilation space (e.g., the skywell), the more pronounced this trend of wind speed and humidity change became. In terms of temperature, the average temperature under Condition 2 was slightly lower than under Condition 1, but its fluctuation range was smaller, indicating that the temperature distribution was more concentrated in Condition 1.
Based on the wind speed, humidity, and temperature result cloud maps, the wind speed distribution across the building’s first floor was relatively uniform, suggesting high spatial homogeneity in the wind environment. However, the humidity and temperature showed significant spatial variation, indicating that humidity and temperature are not only influenced by wind speed but also closely related to the geometric characteristics of the room (e.g., size, location) and the layout of doors and windows (e.g., position, size). Specifically, the air speed fluctuation in the first-floor room was the slowest, indicating a higher stability in the wind environment of this area. In contrast, the fluctuation of humidity and temperature was significantly greater than that of the wind speed, reflecting the greater instability in the humidity and temperature environment. This phenomenon further suggests that the spatial distribution of humidity and temperature is influenced by multiple factors, and their dynamic characteristics are more complex than those of wind speed. Therefore, in building environment control, it is necessary to consider the combined effects of wind speed, humidity, temperature, and their interactions to achieve more precise environmental optimization (shown in
Table 7).
5.1.2. Evaluation of the Second-Floor Room
According to the comparative analysis of the data in
Table 5, the second-floor room showed differences in environmental parameters compared to the first floor. Under both test conditions, the average wind speed of the second-floor room was 0.055 m/s (Condition 1) and 0.070 m/s (Condition 2), which represents an increase of 26.8–27.3% compared to the first-floor room. The average relative humidity was 76.56% and 75.06%, showing a decrease of 2.1–3.8% compared to the first floor. Specifically, in Condition 1, the wind speed range for the second-floor room was 0.005–0.055 m/s, and the humidity fluctuation range was 67.27–83.97%; while in Condition 2, the wind speed range expanded to 0.010–0.180 m/s, and the humidity distribution range adjusted to 65.17–82.93%.
Regarding temperature parameters, the average temperature on the second floor in both cases was 31.04 °C (Condition 1) and 30.53 °C (Condition 2), an increase of 2.76–2.70 °C compared to the first floor. The temperature fluctuation range was 29.17–32.75 °C in Condition 1 and narrowed to 28.18–31.75 °C in Condition 2, showing the optimization effect of the case adjustment on temperature stability.
The data suggest that the vertical spatial distribution affects the indoor microenvironment parameters, with the second-floor area showing characteristics of increased wind speed, lower relative humidity, and a slightly higher temperature gradient, indicating a warmer thermal environment.
In this building, although the wind speed difference between the first and second floors was not significant, the temperature on the second floor was markedly higher than that on the first floor. This phenomenon is primarily attributed to the combined effects of thermodynamic principles and the thermal characteristics of the building. First, according to the principle of natural convection, warm air tends to accumulate in the second-floor area as it rises vertically within the building. Secondly, the thermal conductivity of the building’s envelope further exacerbates the temperature stratification. The second floor, being closer to the roof, is more strongly affected by thermal radiation. The roof absorbs solar radiation, raising its temperature, and through heat conduction, transfers this heat downward, resulting in a significant increase in the temperature gradient on the second floor.
This temperature distribution pattern provides valuable insights into the spatial heterogeneity of the building’s internal thermal environment. This physical phenomenon aligns with the traditional use of the second floor for storage and drying purposes, capitalizing on the high temperature and low humidity characteristics of the space.
In building design and indoor environmental control, it is crucial to consider the coupling effects of thermal convection and heat transfer through the envelope structure. Measures such as optimizing the spatial layout, improving the thermal insulation of the envelope, or adopting zoning control strategies should be implemented to enhance overall indoor thermal comfort (shown in
Table 8).
5.1.3. Evaluation of the Skywell
The simulation data analysis indicates that, due to its expansive spatial characteristics, the skywell exhibits significantly higher wind speeds than the indoor areas. According to
Table 5, the average wind speeds in the skywell under the two operating conditions were 0.70 m/s (Condition 1) and 0.75 m/s (Condition 2), which are approximately 10 to 12 times higher than those in the indoor areas. The average relative humidity was 84.01% (Condition 1) and 82.70% (Condition 2), which is about 5% to 8% lower than that in the indoor regions. Specifically, under Condition 1, the wind speed in the skywell ranged from 0.62 to 1.05 m/s, and the humidity fluctuated between 78.16% and 94.86%. Under Condition 2, the wind speed range extended to 0.7 to 1.10 m/s, and the humidity range narrowed to 82.45% to 89.95%.
Regarding temperature, the average temperature in the skywell was 26.1 °C (Condition 1) and 25.04 °C (Condition 2), which is approximately 3 °C to 5 °C lower than that in the indoor areas, indicating a significant cooling effect. The temperature fluctuation ranged from 25.85 °C to 26.34 °C under Condition 1, and narrowed further to 24.98 °C to 26.09 °C under Condition 2, demonstrating the skywell’s excellent temperature stability.
In summary, under the summer wind conditions, the distribution of wind speed and humidity in the three typical areas of the two-story “Yikeyin” building exhibited notable spatial variability. The results showed a positive correlation between the size of the skywell and wind speed, where larger skywell dimensions lead to higher wind speeds and lower humidity. This finding further supports the idea that increasing the size of the skywell significantly improves the moisture control effect during the summer, offering a crucial theoretical foundation for the spatial optimization of traditional buildings (shown in
Table 9).
In conclusion, during summer wind conditions, the three typical regions of the two-story “Yikeyin” building exhibit different wind and temperature stability characteristics. In terms of wind stability, the interior of the first floor demonstrates the highest stability, likely due to its relatively enclosed spatial structure, which minimizes the impact of wind. The skywell area, on the other hand, shows the lowest stability, as its open space facilitates greater wind movement. The second-floor interior is situated in between, offering moderate stability.
Similarly, temperature stability follows the same pattern. The skywell region, due to its effective ventilation, facilitates the dissipation of warm air, while the temperature in smaller rooms tends to be higher, likely due to limited space, poor air circulation, and the accumulation of heat.
These differences underscore the importance of taking corresponding measures in the design and use of such buildings to optimize the wind and temperature environments, thereby improving the comfort of the indoor living space.
5.2. Winter Simulation Results Analysis
In the winter, numerical simulations were conducted for the traditional two-story “Yikeyin” building under two skywell ratio conditions, 1:1 (Condition 1) and 1:1.2 (Condition 2), to analyze the wind, humidity, and thermal environment. The simulation results revealed a significant correlation between air humidity and wind speed within the building. A comparative analysis of
Figure 18,
Figure 19,
Figure 20 and
Figure 21 indicated that as the skywell ratio decreased from 1:1.2 to 1:1, the variation in wind speed within the building became more gradual, and both humidity and temperature parameters exhibited some spatial differences. Notably, the second-floor room showed the most significant response, with humidity variations reaching 15% and temperature fluctuations exceeding 2 °C, suggesting that changes in the skywell size have a significant impact on the humidity environment on the second floor.
Further spatial analyses revealed a gradient of increasing air humidity from the skywell to the first-floor room and then to the second-floor room, with increases of 20–25%. Similarly, the temperature gradient showed significant spatial differentiation, with temperature differences ranging from 1.5 °C to 2.5 °C. This vertical gradient in thermal and humidity parameters highlights the substantial disparities in thermal and humidity stability, as well as climate perception, across different regions of the building. The skywell area demonstrated strong environmental fluctuations, whereas the interior spaces exhibited relatively stable thermal and humidity characteristics, with the second-floor room being the most sensitive to changes in environmental parameters. As per
Section 3.2.3, observation points are: a (outdoor entrance), b (courtyard center), c (first-floor room), d (second-floor room).
- (1).
- (2).
Based on the analysis of the data in
Table 10, the air velocity in the first-floor room exhibited the slowest fluctuations, indicating a relatively high stability of the wind environment in this area. However, the temperature and humidity variations were relatively significant. Under the two different skywell ratios, the average wind speeds for the first-floor room were 0.015 m/s and 0.017 m/s, and the average humidity values were 53.95% and 52.23%, respectively.
Specifically, under Condition 1 (skywell ratio 1:1), the wind speed fluctuated between 0.003 m/s and 0.032 m/s, with a variation range of 0.029 m/s, while the humidity remained between 39.83% and 57.61%. In Condition 2 (skywell ratio 1:1.2), the wind speed fluctuated between 0.005 m/s and 0.032 m/s, with a variation range of 0.031 m/s, and the humidity remained between 38.59% and 56.32%.
Additionally, the temperature exhibited relatively large fluctuations in both conditions. The average temperature was 10.91 °C under Condition 1 and 9.81 °C under Condition 2. The temperature fluctuations ranged from 7.81 °C to 15.30 °C in Condition 1 and from 6.98 °C to 14.44 °C in Condition 2.
Notably, the results indicate that the expansion of the skywell space in winter significantly contributed to a reduction in both temperature and humidity. The larger the space, the more pronounced the decrease in temperature and humidity, highlighting the importance of spatial design in optimizing the indoor thermal and humidity environment in cold weather.
This analysis further emphasizes the need for careful consideration of spatial configurations and skywell dimensions in the design of winter conditions to ensure better thermal comfort and humidity control within the building.
According to the data in
Table 11, the environmental parameters in the second-floor room showed significant differences under different skywell ratios. In Condition 1, the average wind speed in the room was 0.040 m/s (range: 0.010–0.180 m/s, with a range of 0.170 m/s), and the average humidity was 48.42% (range: 38.80–53.21%). In Condition 2, the average wind speed increased to 0.060 m/s (range: 0.004–0.018 m/s, with a range of 0.014 m/s), and the average humidity decreased to 46.47% (range: 37.60–51.15%).
In terms of temperature, the average temperature in Condition 1 was 12.86 °C (range: 6.66–16.10 °C), which is 1.18 °C higher than the average temperature of 11.68 °C (range: 5.49–15.10 °C) in Condition 2.
Compared to the first-floor space, the second-floor room showed a significantly different humidity distribution, specifically a decrease of 2.5–3.0 percentage points in average humidity, with an expanded fluctuation range (humidity range reaching 10.41%). Additionally, the temperature extremes were notably different: the minimum temperature was 2.17 °C lower than the first floor, and the minimum humidity difference was 8.35%.
This phenomenon indicates that, under the influence of solar radiation and the coupling effect of the skywell ventilation structure, a significant temperature and humidity gradient forms in the second-floor space. The extreme low temperature (≤5.49 °C) and low humidity (≤37.60%) values fell below the lower threshold of the ASHRAE comfort zone, requiring targeted adjustments in the building’s thermal design.
Based on the experimental data, as presented in the table below, the environmental parameters under Condition 1 (skywell ratio 1:1) and Condition 2 (skywell ratio 1:1.2) demonstrated significant differences. In terms of wind speed, the average wind speed in Condition 1 was 0.065 m/s, with maximum and minimum values of 0.076 m/s and 0.054 m/s, respectively. In Condition 2, the average wind speed was slightly higher at 0.070 m/s, with maximum and minimum values of 0.130 m/s and 0.030 m/s, respectively.
In terms of humidity, the average humidity in Condition 1 was 43.94%, with maximum and minimum values of 44.86% and 43.01%, respectively. In Condition 2, the average humidity was lower at 41.61%, with maximum and minimum values of 43.85% and 40.39%, respectively.
In terms of temperature, the average temperature in Condition 1 was 11.49 °C, with maximum and minimum values of 16.55 °C and 6.43 °C, respectively. In Condition 2, the average temperature was 10.41 °C, with maximum and minimum values of 15.60 °C and 5.19 °C, respectively.
Overall, a larger skywell space resulted in a greater fluctuation range in wind speed and humidity, while the temperature was generally lower in Condition 2, indicating that the increase in skywell ratio had a significant impact on the indoor microclimate (shown in
Table 12).
This study demonstrates that significant regional differences exist in the response to environmental climate conditions within traditional skywell dwellings. The skywell area, benefiting from superior ventilation, facilitates air exchange, but this characteristic may be disadvantageous for maintaining warmth during the winter months.
In contrast, the wind, humidity, and thermal stability of rooms across different floors exhibited a clear gradient, with the wind environment becoming increasingly unstable from the first floor to the second floor and to the skywell, while the humidity environment showed an opposite trend. Moreover, the thermal environment of the second-floor room was particularly sensitive to variations in wind speed.
Additionally, the dimensions and proportions of the skywell play a critical role in maintaining overall wind and thermal stability. Skywells with proportions closer to square shapes help reduce fluctuations in wind speed and temperature, aligning with the actual configuration of skywells in most traditional dwellings, thus highlighting the intricate design of traditional skywells in optimizing both indoor and outdoor climate conditions.