Next Article in Journal
Can Digital Financial Inclusion Promote the Sustainable Growth of Farmers’ Income?—An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data from 30 Provinces in China
Previous Article in Journal
Rural Industry Integration in Yan’an City: Development Trends, Driving Factors, and Regional Stratification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator in Evaluating Sustainable Bamboo-Derived Adsorbents for Biogas Upgrading

by
Khaled Abou Alfa
1,*,
Nour Abou Saleh
1,
Adrian Beda
2,3,
Camélia Matei Ghimbeu
2,3,
Grace Iragena Dushime
1,
Frederic Marias
1,
Laurent Moynault
1,
Vincent Platel
1 and
Cecile Hort
1,*
1
Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procedes-IPRA, EA1932, Université Pau, Pays Adour/E2S UPPA, 64000 Pau, France
2
Institut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse (IS2M), CNRS UMR 7361, Université de Haute-Alsace, 68100 Mulhouse, France
3
Institut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse (IS2M) UMR 7361, Université de Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1445; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041445
Submission received: 10 January 2025 / Revised: 31 January 2025 / Accepted: 5 February 2025 / Published: 10 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Materials)

Abstract

Purifying biogas by removing contaminants and carbon dioxide (CO2) to produce biomethane enhances its energy content, making it suitable as fuel and for injection into natural gas grids. Bamboo-derived adsorbents Bamboo-500 (pyrolyzed at 500 °C), Bamboo-700 (pyrolyzed at 700 °C), and Bamboo-A-900 (activated with CO2 at 900 °C) were synthesized and characterized to evaluate their performance for CO2 and CH4 adsorption. Increasing pyrolysis temperature from 500 °C to 700 °C and further CO2 activation at 900 °C enhanced adsorption capacities of CO2 and CH4 due to improved surface area and micropore structure. In this study, the novel Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator (AAPI) approach is introduced, offering an efficient method for evaluating adsorbent performance, particularly in biogas upgrading. AAPI results suggest Bamboo-500 is suitable for biogas upgrading at very low pressures (<0.12 MPa) with low regeneration energy and acceptable CO2 capacity (1.9 ± 0.2 mol kg−1). However, Bamboo-A-900 excelled at medium and high pressures by its highest CO2 adsorption capacity (8.0 ± 0.3 mol kg−1) promoted by the high surface area (1220 m2g−1) and calcium oxide presence. Finally, Bamboo-A-900 shows promise for enhancing CO2 adsorption and biogas upgrading. Bamboo-derived adsorbents offer a sustainable solution for biogas upgrading, supporting Sustainable Development Goals by promoting clean energy transitions.

1. Introduction

Over time, carbon dioxide (CO2) has gained recognition as a significant greenhouse gas contributing to global warming [1]. Concerns about energy security and reducing the environmental effect of fossil fuels while raising living standards have led to the development of renewable energy sources in this context [2,3]. Bioenergy, specifically biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of biomass wastes, stands out as a potential option [4,5]. Biogas, produced in an oxygen-free environment, consists primarily of methane (CH4) (50–75%) and CO2 (25–50%), with traces of other gases such as water vapor, ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), siloxanes, halogenated hydrocarbons, etc. Under standard conditions, CH4 has a calorific value of 36 MJ m−3, which is higher than the 21 MJ m−3 of raw biogas [6]. Purifying biogas to biomethane through eliminating impurities and CO2 enhances its energy content and purity, making it ideal for various uses such as power generation, vehicle fuel, and injection into natural gas grids.
Adsorption has become an attractive CO2 upgrading method due to its eco-friendliness, low energy needs, safe operation, removal efficiency, and flexible design [7,8]. A variety of materials have been studied for CO2 adsorption and biogas upgrading, such as activated carbons [9,10,11,12,13], biochars [14,15,16,17], carbon molecular sieves [18,19], metal–organic frameworks [20,21], and zeolites [22,23]. Although metal–organic frameworks and zeolites have large surface areas that are suitable for CO2 adsorption, their use has been limited due to their high production costs and affinity for moisture [24,25]. Biochar is usually synthesized through dry pyrolysis at temperatures of 400–900 °C under inert conditions; thus, biochars’ porous structure is primarily controlled by carbonization temperature. Raw biomass has high aliphatic content and low aromaticity, reflected in its H/C and O/C ratios of 1.4–1.8 and 0.55–0.75, respectively, which decrease during carbonization, particularly at higher temperatures [26,27]. Biochar’s limited CO2 adsorption capacity is due to its low surface area and surface functional groups [28].
Recent studies have concentrated on developing biochars and activated biochar from biomass wastes, due to their potential for cost-effectiveness and waste revalorization. Efficient use of biomass-derived adsorbents is not only promising for biogas upgrading, but it also supports a number of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG 7 and SDG 12, which promote clean energy and responsible consumption of renewable biomass resources [29]. Bamboo waste stands out as an abundant, renewable, and cost-effective agroindustrial residue. Distributed widely across tropical and subtropical regions, bamboo encompasses nearly 1500 species in 87 genera. Its high productivity (10–40 t ha−1 year−1) and substantial biomass density (300–900 kg m−3) make it a globally sustainable resource for bioenergy, with reduced logistics costs that enhance its economic feasibility [30,31]. Biochars and activated biochars produced from bamboo wastes have been used for a variety of applications, including the removal of nitrogen oxides [32], sulfur dioxide, dyes, and phenol formaldehyde [33], volatile organic compounds [34], and carbon dioxide [35,36].
Researchers have increasingly focused on enhancing CO2 adsorption capacity and selectivity on porous carbon materials. Many research works have studied different bamboo activation methods and their effect on the CO2 adsorption capacities. The maximum adsorption capacity of 4.1 mol kg−1 was attained by chemically activating bamboo powder with K2CO3 [37], whereas the maximum adsorption capacity of 3.4 mol kg−1 was obtained by carbonizing bamboo under N2 and physically activating it with CO2 [38]. Additionally, bamboo materials that were carbonized and activated with various concentrations of NaNH2 demonstrated a good capacity of 5 mol kg−1 at 0 °C and about 4 mol kg−1 at 25 °C [39]. Furthermore, bamboo activated with a 50% w/v H3PO4 solution showed an adsorption capacity of up to 9 mol kg−1 [35]. Chemical activation techniques typically result in better CO2 adsorption efficiencies than physical activation techniques [40].
Despite the fact that bamboo-derived adsorbents have been used in numerous studies, no research has investigated their potential as raw biomass for upgrading biogas by capturing its primary constituents (CO2 and CH4). The present study aims to address this gap by comparing and assessing the effectiveness and adsorption performance of bamboo-derived biochars and activated biochar for CO2 and CH4. Raw bamboo was chosen for its abundance in Ecuador, its origin, and its widespread use in sustainable housing construction, which generates significant waste and drives the need for new valorization pathways. This study seeks to answer key questions, such as, how do surface properties and pore structure of bamboo-derived adsorbents influence their CO2 and CH4 adsorption performance? What is the impact of pyrolysis temperature and activation methods on their adsorption efficiency? An indicator known as the Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator (AAPI) was developed to assess the adsorption performance of these materials based on the identification of the three main adsorption parameters: adsorption capacity, approximate selectivity, and heat of adsorption [41]. Furthermore, a range of analytical techniques were used to characterize the materials, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of their adsorption properties. This approach aims to offer insightful information about the potential of bamboo-derived materials for enhancing biogas upgrading processes and advancing sustainability efforts.

2. Materials and Experimental Apparatuses

2.1. Raw Biomass, and the Preparation of Biochars and Activated Biochars

The initial precursor material, bamboo, was sourced from Yachay Tech University in Ecuador, where bamboo is widely used, aligning this research with efforts to revalorize waste materials. Three adsorbents were used for comparison and evaluation: one activated biochar produced at 900 °C and two pyrolyzed biochars at 500 and 700 °C (see Figure 1); these temperatures were chosen considering that they were the most effective range to obtain ideal textural properties, as they facilitate the development of a well-defined pore structure, which is important for enhancing adsorption capacity [42,43,44,45]. Physical activation with CO2 was used because it is less expensive than chemical activation. To produce the biochar “Bamboo-500”, a quantity of raw bamboo on a dry base was subjected to a pyrolysis process up to 500 °C in an oxygen-limited environment, resulting in a mass loss of 59.1%. After that, raw bamboo was pyrolyzed at 700 °C in an argon (Ar) atmosphere at a flow rate of 10 L h−1 ( identical to the conditions used for producing Bamboo-500) to produce Bamboo-700, with a mass loss of 68.7%. Pyrolysis products yield varied with increasing the temperature from 500 to 700 °C (Table 1). Biochar yield decreased by increasing the pyrolysis temperature; this is because at higher temperatures, there was a rapid and comprehensive decomposition of lignocellulosic components that resulted in a reduction in biochar yield. Finally, Bamboo-700 was activated with CO2 for 120 min at 900 °C and a flow rate of 12 L h−1 (heating and cooling were carried out under Ar). The activated biochar obtained from this process is named Bamboo-A-900, with a mass loss of 40.2%.

2.2. Physico-Chemical Characterizations of Bamboo Family

The bamboo family’s physico-chemical characteristics were examined using the same experimental setups under the same experimental conditions as our earlier investigation on the cocoa pod husk family [14]. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyze the carbon morphology and pore structure of the bamboo materials, with micrographs captured using a FEI Quanta 400 microscope (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and chemical compositions provided using an INCA x-act detector for Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy (Oxford Instruments, High Wycombe, UK). Multiple EDX acquisitions were performed over large areas, and the average values from 4 or 5 different zones were used for the final results. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) was performed using a Bruker D8 Advance A25 diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), generating diffraction patterns by scattering X-rays through the crystal lattice, providing insights into the materials’ crystalline phases. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) using a METTLER TOLEDO TGA/DSC3+ (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Suisse) yielded information on the bamboo family’s thermal stability and breakdown temperatures through regulated heating procedures using nitrogen and air flows. For TGA runs, Bamboo-500 was repeated three times to check equipment consistency, with identical results but the other two samples were measured once. Furthermore, N2 physisorption tests on an ASAP 2420 instrument (Micromeritics, Atlanta, GA, USA) at 77 K measured the specific surface area and pore volumes of bamboo materials. These samples were degassed to eliminate residual molecules, and the Brunauer–Emmett-Teller (BET) method used to determine the N2 specific surface area and Dubinin–Radushkevich model applied to determine total, micro, and mesopore volumes. These analyses, which provide a comprehensive understanding of the physical properties of materials. Pore size distribution was analyzed using N2 adsorption isotherms, employing two-dimensional nonlocal density functional theory (2D-NLDFT) with SAIEUS software (version 3.2, Micromeritics) to derive the pore size distribution and average pore width (L0).

2.3. Adsorption Characteristics Set-Ups

2.3.1. Calorimetry Experiments

High-pressure differential scanning calorimeter (Setaram micro DSC-VII) was utilized to determine the heat of CO2 adsorption of bamboo materials. The preparation protocol has been thoroughly described in a previous work [41]. Samples, approximately 70 mg, were weighed and introduced into the measurement cell, and the temperature program was set accordingly. Nitrogen served as a purge gas throughout the process, with a regeneration step initially removing impurities by vacuum and heating at 373 K for 24 h. Pure CO2 was then introduced at 303 K until system pressure stabilized in the pressure range 0.1–2 MPa. By dividing the integral heat by the CO2 adsorption capacity, the heat of adsorption (kJ mol−1 of CO2) was obtained.

2.3.2. Gas Adsorption Isotherm

Pure gas adsorption isotherms were obtained using a homemade high-pressure manometric setup [46,47,48,49] and involved an initial 24-h outgassing phase at 373 K under vacuum pressure (10−2 Pa), after that, the adsorption isotherm settles at the study temperature (303 K). Measurements were performed using a fixed adsorbent mass of 1 g. All measurements were conducted on samples from the same preparation batch to ensure consistency and reproducibility. Following a series of helium expansions from the dose volume ( V d ) to the adsorption volume (Vads), the accessible volume in the adsorption cell was calculated. Helium traces were eliminated using a 4-h vacuum. Once the dead-space volume was obtained by helium calibration, a quantity of pure gases (CH4 or CO2) was introduced into the dosing cell, and the pressure was registered upon reaching equilibrium (constant pressure). Subsequently, the gas was expanded into the adsorption cell, and the pressure was recorded when equilibrium was achieved. The amount of gas adsorbed into the adsorbent for the first point is calculated using the following equation:
n a d s 1 ( T , P 1 ) = 1 m a d s ( ( V d ρ i 1 ) ( ( V d + V a d s ) ρ f 1 ) )
The adsorption isotherm was then performed using an accumulative approach, increasing the pressure by approximately 5 bar in between measurements. The following formula was used to calculate the gas’s adsorption capacity at step i:
n a d s i ( T , P i ) = 1 m a d s ( ( V a d s ρ f i 1 + V d ρ i i ) ( ( V d + V a d s ) ρ f i ) )
where mads (g) is the mass of the adsorbent, ρ i and ρ f (g cm−3) are the molar density at initial and final pressures respectively, n a d s 1 and n a d s i (mol kg−1) are the excess adsorbed quantities for the first point and the latter points, respectively, V d (cm3) is the dosing cell volume. To ensure the reliability of the results, repeatability was conducted by performing each measurement two times, and any uncertainty was quantified by calculating the standard deviation from the two repetitions.

2.4. Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator

Several methods have been proposed to evaluate the performance of adsorbents using both pure component and gas mixture isotherms [50,51,52,53,54,55]. The core concept of this study is based on the use of Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator (AAPI), which was previously applied in our recent work [41] to assess the adsorption performance of the bamboo family. This indicator is adapted from Wiersum et al.’s [54] Adsorption Performance Indicator, which relies on gas mixture isotherms. In this context, AAPI is based on pure gas adsorption isotherms and takes into account the approximate selectivity (AS), adsorption capacity of CO2, and heat of adsorption of CO2, can be expressed as follows:
A A P I = ( A S C O 2 / C H 4 1 ) A n a d s , C O 2 B | Δ H a d s , C O 2 | C
where AS of CO2 over CH4 molecules is calculated as follows:
A S C O 2 / C H 4 = n a d s , C O 2 n a d s , C H 4
n a d s , C O 2 and n a d s , C H 4 denote the adsorption capacity of the stronger adsorbate (CO2) and CH4, respectively, and Δ H a d s , C O 2 signifies the heat of adsorption of CO2. The exponents corresponding to the approximate selectivity, adsorption capacity, and heat of adsorption are denoted by parameters A, B, and C, respectively. The exponent “B = 2” is used to emphasize the parameter “adsorption capacity” because the objective is to separate CO2 from CH4, while A and C (see Equation (3)), are set to 1. The exponent B was chosen to be 2 to achieve a balanced weighting between adsorption capacity, approximate selectivity, and heat of adsorption. A sensitivity analysis varying B from 1 to 3 showed that when B = 1, the AAPI gave more weight to selectivity and heat of adsorption, causing adsorbents with lower adsorption capacity but higher selectivity to rank higher. In contrast, when B = 3, more emphasis was placed on adsorption capacity, shifting the rankings toward adsorbents with higher CO2 capacity, while reducing the importance of selectivity and heat of adsorption.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Bamboo Family Characterization

3.1.1. SEM Analysis

SEM images were obtained at various magnification scales (500 μm, 200 μm and 100 μm) to investigate the morphological changes in bamboo samples after carbonization (Bamboo-500, Bamboo-700) and subsequent activation (Bamboo-A-900) (Figure 2). The materials exhibit a fibrous structure with long, wide fibers composed of several fused thinner fibers. While SEM images of the raw bamboo are not available in this study as it focused on the characterization of processed materials, previous analysis by Sahoo et al. [56] reported an almost negligible presence of pores in raw bamboo. The materials present a fibrous structure with long fibers which are wide due to the fact that they are composed of several fused thinner fibers. Bamboo-500 exhibited a sheet-like structure with few pores due to limited thermal decomposition. Conversely, the transition from 500 °C to 700 °C yielded Bamboo-700, which, along with Bamboo-500, exhibited a honeycomb-like structure with similar macroporosity. However, Bamboo-A-900 induced significant cracking in bamboo structure, enhancing porosity and surface texture, result from thermal stress, chemical reactions, and gas release during activation. At a magnification scale of 200 μm, long fibers changed their shape resembling the form of curved fibers due to the high burn-off rates and considerable carbon removal during activation. Ji et al. [57] found that biochar derived from bamboo displays a denser porous structure and less pore distribution compared to bamboo activated with KOH. CO2 activation, particularly, induces substantial structural alterations, making it a promising method for porous structure generation [58]. Such macropores can be beneficial for gas diffusion towards micropores, enhancing therefore the adsorption kinetics.

3.1.2. EDX Analysis

EDX analysis of the bamboo family identified various components, notably carbon (C) and oxygen (O), alongside silicon (Si), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), etc. (Table 2). Varying the pyrolysis temperature and activating the biochar induces changes in chemical composition, as supported by the literature [59,60]. Bamboo-500 exhibited a high carbon content (71.1%), which is attributed to bamboo’s substantial cellulose mass fraction (47.7%) [61]. Transitioning from Bamboo-500 to Bamboo-700 removes volatile compounds and enhances carbonization, elevating carbon content from 71.1% to 75.9% [62,63]. This rise in the carbon mass fraction is caused by the decrease of (-OH) surface functional groups during dehydration and the development of denser carbon structures through polymerization processes [64]. Higher pyrolysis temperatures tend to produce more stable biochars because of their condensed aromatic character [65]. Similar trends in elemental compositions of biochars at various temperatures are reported in literature [66,67]. Oxygen mass fraction reduced in Bamboo-700 from 23.1 to 17.3 % due to gas and vapor phase release, including H2, CO, CO2, hydrocarbons, and water [65,68], consistent with Yu et al.’s findings [56,69]. Changes in biochar chemical composition after CO2 activation at 900 °C arise from several factors: the high activation temperature facilitates the decomposition and gasification of carbonaceous material, reducing the carbon content from 75.9% in Bamboo-700 to 68.5 wt.%, while introducing functional groups containing oxygen (O increases from 17.3% to 20.2%), which could improve adsorption properties. The rise in oxygen content can also be attributed to the increased presence of inorganic matter (Si, K, Ca), as these elements are typically bonded with oxygen in forms such as oxides and carbonates. This is further supported by the observed increase in total inorganic content, which grew from 6.4% to 10.7% (see Table 2). Carbon-based material decomposition and subsequent reaction with CO2 during activation may be the source of the oxygen-containing groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl, or carbonyl groups) that are incorporated onto the bamboo surface [70]. Silicon (Si) dominates in Bamboo-A-900 (7.5%) which can be confirmed by the increase in the ash content in TGA analysis (Table 2), in the form of Cristobalite (SiO2), attributed to selective carbon component removal or enhanced silicon retention in biochar matrix.

3.1.3. TGA Analysis

Initially, raw bamboo has a high volatile content (75.1%), primarily stemming from decomposition of organic compounds like cellulose (300–400 °C) and hemicellulose (220–315 °C), which vaporize at relatively low temperatures [71]. Upon pyrolysis at 500 °C, moisture decreases from 7.2% to 5.2%, and volatile content diminishes from 75.1% to 16.1% compared to untreated bamboo (Figure 3a and Table 2). This reduction reflects the evaporation of water at low temperatures (<120 °C) alongside the thermal breakdown of organic matter, leading to an increase in fixed carbon content from 13.4% to 65% and ash content from 4.3% to 13.7% (Figure 3b), yielding a carbon-rich residue. However, an increase in the moisture content from 5.2% to 7.4% was observed with an increase in pyrolysis temperature from 500 °C to 700 °C due to the improvement of porosity (SBET) (Table 2) favoring physisorption phenomena. Additionally, further decomposition of volatile organic compounds reduces volatile content from 16.1% to 5.1% [72,73], while fixed carbon content increases from 65% to 74.5% (Table 2). Interestingly, the increase in the pyrolysis temperature from 500 °C to 700 °C does not affect ash content (13%), as observed by Palniandy et al. [73]. Notably, Bamboo-A-900 exhibits a substantial increase in ash content, i.e., 34.1% compared to 13% in Bamboo-700, which can be attributed to the concentration of inherent minerals as carbon is removed during activation. This increase is accompanied by a rise in silicon content from 4.1% in Bamboo-700 to 7.5% in Bamboo-A-900 (Table 2).

3.1.4. XRD Analysis

Changes in peak intensities, positions, and widths in the XRD patterns among samples from the bamboo family indicate variations in crystallinity and structural transformations occurring during pyrolysis and activation processes (see Figure 4). XRD patterns of bamboo biochars (Figure 4) indicate presence of inorganic minerals such as SiO2 ( Crystallography Open Database (COD) 9008110) (Cristobalite, 2 θ = 20.86°, 45°) and CaO (COD 7200686) (lime, 2 θ = 38°, 55°, 65°) for Bamboo-A-900, and CaCO3 (COD 9014524) observed for Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700 (calcite, 2 θ = 22°, 43°, 80°). For both Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700, two broad peaks indicate the presence of disordered-like carbon at 2 θ values of 20–28° and 40–45°, with more prominent peaks observed in Bamboo-500 due to lower biomass undergoing thermal degradation [74,75], similar observations were seen by Jena et al. [76]. Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700 exhibit disordered carbon structures, indicating that the pyrolysis of biomass does not favor graphitization. This is attributed to the strong cross-linking effects, which hinder the reorganization of graphene planes into ordered structures [77]. The two broad peaks observed in Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700 are less observed, and sharper and higher intensity peaks appear in Bamboo-A-900 at the same 2 θ values due to higher ash content (see Table 2) [78]. The sharp peaks observed are predominantly due to crystalline impurities, especially SiO2, which become more pronounced at higher ash content. This suggests that the increased visibility of impurities occurs to the detriment of carbon [79]. The presence of CaCO3 in Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700 indicates the presence of Ca-based species within bamboo biomass precursor. The absence of CaCO3 in Bamboo-A-900 suggests its thermal decomposition during pyrolysis, releasing CO2 and leaving behind CaO as a residual product. Furthermore, identification of SiO2 in Bamboo-A-900 at 900 °C suggests presence of silicon-containing compounds in bamboo biomass, which undergo thermal decomposition and transformation to silica during activation. Such silica may originate from various sources within bamboo, including phytoliths or silicate minerals present in biomass. In conclusion, SiO2 emerges as a dominant crystalline phase indicated by the very high silicon content (7.5%) in Bamboo-A-900 (Table 2) with a small amount of CaO.

3.1.5. Textural Characterization

The textural properties of the bamboo materials underwent significant alterations due to pyrolysis and CO2 activation (Table 2). The N2 adsorption isotherms provide insights into the pore structures of Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900. However, the N2 isotherm for Bamboo-500 is not presented due to the absence of measurable pores, falling within the detection limit and error range of the instrument. According to the classification of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) [80], Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 both have isotherm shapes that are very similar to type I. This indicates rapid adsorption at low relative pressures (P/P0 < 0.05), followed by a plateau that suggests monolayer adsorption in micropores [81]. However, the appearance of a type IV isotherm for Bamboo-A-900 at P/P0 > 0.9, in which the isotherm deviates from the parallel shape with P/P0 (Figure 5a), suggesting the presence of small mesopores (increase of V m e s o from 0.07 (Bamboo-700) to 0.26 cm3 g−1 (Bamboo-A-900), Table 2). Compared to Bamboo-700, Bamboo-A-900 has a greater N2 adsorption capacity because it has larger pore volumes in the micropore and mesopore regions, probably due to the opening of inaccessible pores during oxidation [82]. Activation of Bamboo-700 raises the BET surface area from 365 to 1220 m2 g−1, micropore volume from 0.09 to 0.34 cm3 g−1, mesopore volume from 0.07 to 0.26 cm3 g−1, and total pore volume from 0.16 to 0.6 cm3 g−1 (see Table 2). As a result, activation causes significant textural changes, making the material more porous and significantly increasing the surface area accessible for adsorption [72]. The larger surface area offers more active sites, making the material suitable for applications such as CO2 adsorption, thus potentially improving adsorption efficiency [83].
The pore size distributions derived from the N2 adsorption isotherms exhibit heterogeneous structures of porous materials. Analysis reveals that both Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 exhibit multiple modal distributions in the micropore region (pores smaller than 2 nm) and the mesopore region (pores ranging from 2 to 50 nm) (Figure 5b). In the micropore region, Bamboo-A-900 curve displays a prominent narrow peak at a pore size of 0.52 nm with a maximum pore volume of 0.066 cm3 g−1, the presence of this low micropore strongly influence CO2 adsorption at low partial pressures [84]; however, Bamboo-700 exhibits a bimodal distribution consisting of two narrow peaks, with a maximum peak located at a pore size of 0.99 nm and a pore volume of 0.009 cm3 g−1 (Figure 5b). In the mesopore region, both Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 present distinct minor peaks at varying pore widths. Remarkably, the pore size distribution pattern of Bamboo-A-900 is comparable to that of activated biochar derived from tabah bamboo at 820 °C [85]. The average pore widths of Bamboo-700 (0.96 nm) and Bamboo-A-900 (0.73 nm) are particularly noteworthy as they both fall within the micropore range (Table 2). This is significant because these micropores directly influence the effectiveness of CO2 and CH4 capture and their adsorption processes within the bamboo family due to the fact that the diameters of CO2 (0.33 nm) and CH4 molecules (0.38 nm) align with the micropore range [8,86].

3.2. Heat of Adsorption

The heat of CO2 adsorption of bamboo materials at 303 K as a function of pressure (Figure 6) signifies the strength of the adsorption interaction between CO2 molecules and the material’s surface, indicating their affinity for gas molecules. The lower heat of CO2 adsorption for Bamboo-500 (16.7 ± 0.6 kJ mol−1) compared to Bamboo-700 (19.5 ± 0.8 kJ mol−1) at 0.1 MPa (Figure 6) suggests weaker interactions at the lower pyrolysis temperature (500 °C), possibly due to limited surface area and fewer active adsorption sites. The decrease in volatile matter content from 16.1% to 5.1% (Table 2) as the pyrolysis temperature increases from 500 °C to 700 °C contributes to the increase of both surface area and pore volume [87]. Additionally, the comparable heat of CO2 adsorption for Bamboo-A-900 (19.1 ± 0.3 kJ mol−1) relative to Bamboo-700 (19.5 ± 0.8 kJ mol−1) suggests that CO2 activation has minimal effect on the strength of the adsorption interaction, despite differences in surface chemistry between the materials. The heat of CO2 adsorption into Bamboo-500, Bamboo-700, and Bamboo-A-900 decreases from 16.7 ± 0.6, 19.5 ± 0.8, and 19.0 ± 0.3 kJ mol−1 to 14.7 ± 1.1, 14.2 ± 1.3, and 16 ± 1 kJ mol−1 in the 0.1–1.9 MPa pressure range, respectively. For all the samples, this heat is high in the low-pressure region due to the strong interaction between CO2 molecules and the favorable active sites of the samples surface (monolayer adsorption). As pressure increases, the heat of adsorption had a tendency to decrease and stabilize because most accessible adsorption sites are occupied, weakening the interactions between adsorbent and CO2 molecules [88]. As the heat of CO2 adsorption obtained for the bamboo family remains below 40 kJ mol−1, the predominant adsorption interactions appear to align with physisorption rather than chemisorption [89]. The dipole–dipole interactions between the adsorbent and CO2 molecules are mainly governed by physical mechanisms such as Van Der Waals forces [90]. Moreover, Bamboo-500 with the lowest initial adsorption heat of 16.7 ± 0.6 has less energy consumption during the desorption process, making it more kinetically feasible to regenerate.

3.3. Adsorption Isotherms

From the pure gas adsorption isotherms shown in Figure 7, the CO2 and CH4 adsorption capacities of the bamboo family were calculated. The preferential adsorption of CO2 over CH4 for all the samples (AS > 1) relies on their physical and chemical properties. CO2, being a smaller molecule (0.33 nm) with higher polarizability (29.1 × 10−25 cm3) and quadrupole moment (−13.71 × 10−40 cm2), diffuses more easily and interacts more extensively with surface functional groups on biochars [91]. These interactions include Van Der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding, which are less favorable for the larger CH4 molecule (0.38 nm), which has lower polarizability (25.9 × 10−25 cm3) and zero quadrupole moment [92].
AS was the highest in Bamboo-500 under the low pressure region due to the very low CH4 adsorption capacity of 0.3 ± 0.1 mol kg−1 at 0.1 MPa (Figure 7). This low capacity is attributed to the limited pore structure development resulting from the low pyrolysis temperature of 500 °C. However, in the high-pressure range, CH4 is more compressed into the pores, resulting in lower AS for all the samples [93]. The increase in CO2 and CH4 adsorption capacities of bamboo pyrolyzed at 700 °C from 1.9 ± 0.2 mol kg−1 to 3.8 ± 0.1 mol kg−1 and from 0.8 ± 0.2 mol kg−1 to 1.4 ± 0.2 mol kg−1, respectively, compared to 500 °C at 1.9 MPa (Figure 7), can be attributed to changes in its physical and chemical characteristics. Higher CH4 adsorption capacity on Bamboo-700 can be explained by a more porous structure with increased surface area and microporosity in this sample. The significant decrease in volatile matter from 16.1% to 5.1% (Table 2), enhancing CO2 adsorption efficiency by reducing blockages of the pores. This suggests that the optimal pyrolysis temperature for producing bamboo-derived biochar with a higher surface area and appropriate pore structure is more than 500 °C.
On the other hand, Bamboo-A-900 exhibits improved CO2 and CH4 adsorption capacities (8.0 ± 0.3 and 3.4 ± 0.2 mol kg−1, respectively) compared to Bamboo-700 (3.8 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.2 mol kg−1, respectively) and Bamboo-500 (1.9 ± 0.3 and 0.8 ± 0.2 mol kg−1, respectively) at 1.9 MPa (see Figure 7). This enhancement is linked to the increase in BET surface area from 365 m2g−1 to 1220 m2g−1, micropore volume from 0.09 to 0.34 cm3 g−1, and mesopore volume from 0.07 to 0.26 cm3 g−1 as indicated in Table 2, which offers additional adsorption sites for CO2 molecules [38,94,95]. In addition, the presence of O-functional groups and CaO in Bamboo-A-900 enhances interactions with CO2 molecules, making these factors particularly effective in the intermediate and high-pressure ranges. This results in increased CO2 adsorption and contributes to higher selectivity. Based on the pore size distribution, Bamboo-A-900 shows the highest CO2 and CH4 adsorption capacities due to the presence of most pores in the micropore range of 0.5–0.7 nm and 1–2 nm (Figure 5b). For efficient separation of CO2 and CH4, the more critical pore size range is between 0.3–0.4 nm, as this range aligns with the molecular size of CO2 and CH4 (0.33 and 0.38 nm, respectively), which enhances selectivity for their separation [8]. A study showed that most CH4 is adsorbed at a pore size distribution in the range of 0.5–1 nm [96], with similar findings observed in a recent study [85]. In addition, XRD analysis reveals the presence of CaO on the Bamboo-A-900 surface (Figure 4), which reacts with CO2 under ambient conditions to form CaCO3 [97], as shown in Figure 8, enhancing CO2 adsorption capacity.

3.4. Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator

AAPI was used to assess the preliminary performance of bamboo-derived adsorbents for separating CO2 from CH4, based on the adsorption of the pure gases CO2 and CH4. However, this preliminary evaluation does not fully represent the adsorption properties of the CO2/CH4 mixture, as gas interactions and competitive adsorption could influence the results. AAPI results indicate that the adsorption performance of the most effective adsorbent varies with pressure. At very low pressure (<0.12 MPa), Bamboo-500 is identified as the ideal adsorbent with a maximum value of 1.04 ± 0.02. This is primarily due to its highest AS (7.3 ± 0.7), lowest heat of CO2 adsorption (16.7 ± 0.6 kJ mol−1) and lowest CH4 adsorption capacity (0.3 ± 0.1 mol kg−1). These characteristics are attributed to its smaller surface area, lower porosity, and fewer favorable adsorption sites. Despite Bamboo-A-900 having the highest CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.6 ± 0.1 mol kg−1 at 0.12 MPa, its separation performance is reduced due to its higher CH4 adsorption capacity (0.8 ± 0.1 mol kg−1) and heat of CO2 adsorption of 19.1 ± 0.3 kJ mol−1. Therefore, activating the biochar appears unnecessary for CO2 separation from CH4 at very low pressures, reducing industrial process costs as shown in Figure 9. However, at pressures above 0.12 MPa, AAPI results indicate that Bamboo-A-900 becomes the most effective adsorbent, with an AAPI value of 5.5 ± 0.1, compared to 1.6 ± 0.2 for Bamboo-700 and 0.3 ± 0.1 for Bamboo-500 at 1.9 MPa (see Table 3). This superior performance is due to Bamboo-A-900’s higher CO2 adsorption capacity (8.0 ± 0.3 mol kg−1), thanks to the highest BET surface area (1220 m2g−1), increased micropores and mesopores, O-functional groups effect, and the presence of CaO, which enhances interactions with CO2 molecules, as these factors become more effective in the intermediate and high pressure range. This approach improves the sustainability of renewable energy systems by enhancing the quality of biomethane, which can substitute fossil fuels, lowering greenhouse gas emissions and contributing to climate action and its impacts (SDG 13) in the SDGs [29].

3.5. Comparative Analysis of CO2 Adsorption Capacities of All the Studied Biochars and Activated Biochars

A comparison of CO2 adsorption capacities among various samples at 0.1 MPa (Table 4) reveals that the Bamboo-500 demonstrated a CO2 adsorption capacity of 1.7 mol kg−1, which is slightly lower than the 2.1 mol kg−1 reported by Xie et al. [98] for a similar temperature, likely due to differences in surface area and preparation methods. This value is comparable to high-performing biochars like spent coffee grounds and walnut shell at the different pyrolysis temperatures [99,100]. However, Bamboo-700 exhibits an adsorption capacity of 2.1 mol kg−1, outperforming other pristine biochars in the literature at the same pyrolysis temperature (see Table 4), indicating that higher pyrolysis temperatures for the same raw material enhance biochar’s adsorption capacity. Compared to other biochars such as sawdust and walnut shell [100,101], which show lower adsorption capacities ranging from 0.4 to 1.6 mol kg−1 across various temperatures, Bamboo-700 demonstrate superior performance, highlighting its potential as effective CO2 adsorbent.
For activated biochars, Bamboo-A-900 shows a CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.6 ± 0.1 mol kg−1 at 0.1 MPa, which is higher than the 2.0 mol kg−1 reported by Khuong et al. [38] for bamboo biochar activated with CO2 at 800 °C (see Table 4). This improvement is attributed to the increased surface area and enhanced pore structure resulting from higher activation temperatures, facilitating more effective CO2 adsorption. However, chemically activating bamboo powder with K2CO3 achieved an adsorption capacity of 4.1 mol kg−1 [37]. In addition, it can be observed that many activated biochars with lower surface areas demonstrate higher CO2 adsorption capacity, indicate that functional groups play a significant role, i.e., Commercial kevlar with a SBET of 1593 m2g−1 has lower CO2 adsorption capacity (1.5 mol kg−1) compared to Bamboo-A-900 (2.6 mol kg−1), despite its lower SBET of 1220 m2g−1. Also, bamboo samples carbonized and activated with varying concentrations of NaNH2 exhibited an optimal capacity of 5 mol kg−1 at 273 K and around 3.5 mol kg−1 at 298 K [39]. Moreover, bamboo biochars activated with KOH show significantly higher adsorption capacities, such as 4.5 mol kg−1 and 4.0 mol kg−1 at 873 °C and 973 °C, respectively, as reported by Wei et al. [83]. This substantial increase is likely due to the creation of additional micropores and functional groups that enhance CO2 affinity. Bamboo-A-900 exhibits a CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.6 ± 0.1 mol kg−1, comparable to the 2.7 mol kg−1 for almond shells activated with CO2 at 750 °C by Gonzalez et al. [102] and outperforming beech wood biochar, which has an adsorption capacity of 2.1 mol kg−1 at 1087 °C by Zgrzebnicki et al. [103]. Further optimization, especially through chemical activation methods (using KOH, K2CO3, NaNH2, etc.) could significantly enhance the performance of these biochars, as evidenced by the higher adsorption capacities reported in other studies [57,83].
Table 4. Comparison of CO2 adsorption into biochars derived from various feedstocks at 0.1 MPa with their properties. Tads: Adsorption temperature; AdC: Adsorption Capacity; n.a: not available.
Table 4. Comparison of CO2 adsorption into biochars derived from various feedstocks at 0.1 MPa with their properties. Tads: Adsorption temperature; AdC: Adsorption Capacity; n.a: not available.
SamplesTprocess
(°C)
Activating AgentC
(wt.%)
O
(wt.%)
S BET
(m2g−1)
T ads
(K)
AdC(CO2)
(mol kg−1)
Ref.
Pristine biochars
Bamboo-500500-71.123.1n.a3031.7This study
Bamboo-700700-75.917.33653032.1This study
Bamboo500-66.224.8922982.1[98]
Bamboo600-6629.2892982.2[98]
Sawdust450-82.314.18.83030.4[101]
Sawdust750-97.31.5311.43031.0[101]
Sawdust850-93.45.21823031.1[101]
Walnut shell500-69.425.194.52980.6[100]
Walnut shell700-80.317.52652981.3[100]
Walnut shell900-84.913.63972981.6[100]
Spent coffee grounds500-79.75.43113030.7[99]
Rambutan peel500-76.419.27.803030.6[104]
Rambutan peel700-81.615.91763031.3[104]
Rambutan peel900-83.414.75703031.6[104]
Perilla leaf700-71.815.3473.43232.3[105]
Korean oak400-88.79.7270.83230.6[105]
Japanese oak500-89.97.5475.63230.4[105]
Soybean stover700-81.915.5420.33230.7[105]
Activated biochars
Bamboo-A-900900CO268.520.212203032.6This study
Bamboo800CO2n.an.a6372982.0[38]
Bamboo873KOHn.an.a18462984.5[83]
Bamboo973KOHn.an.a9302984.0[83]
Bamboo700KOHn.an.a5402983.4[57]
Bamboo1073K2CO370.4n.a18022983.4[37]
Bamboo500NaNH274.6n.a12862983.5[39]
Sargassum800KOHn.an.a2922981.1[106]
Almond shells750CO2n.an.a8222982.7[102]
Commercial kevlar1000CO2n.an.a15933031.5[9]
Commercial kevlar1000CO2n.an.a15863031.7[9]
Beech wood1087CO2n.an.a15863032.1[103]
In summary, the results indicate that bamboo biochars have strong potential for CO2 adsorption. Bamboo-700 particularly with a CO2 capacity of 2.1 mol kg−1 shows competitive adsorption capacities compared to other pristine biochars and even activated biochars (e.g., 1.5 mol kg−1 for activated commercial Kevlar [9] and 1.1 mol kg−1 for activated sargassum [106]). Comparison with other studies highlights that while bamboo biochars are highly effective, there is potential for further optimization, particularly through chemical activation methods to enhance their adsorption properties [40]. However, chemical activation requires more energy and incurs additional costs for washing out excess agents, and it may negatively impact the separation performance of CO2/CH4 mixtures [107].

4. Conclusions

Three carbon-based samples derived from bamboo were prepared, characterized through a series of physico-chemical analysis, and evaluated based of their adsorption properties in this study: Bamboo-500 (pyrolyzed at 500 °C), Bamboo-700 (pyrolyzed at 700 °C), and Bamboo-A-900 (pyrolyzed and activated with CO2 at 900 °C). Increasing the pyrolysis temperature from 500 °C to 700 °C enhances the adsorption capacities of CO2 and CH4 due to the improvement of the surface area and pore structure of the bamboo-derived samples. Further activation of the pyrolyzed bamboo with CO2 at 900 °C significantly increases the specific surface area and pore texture, as evidenced by N2 adsorption analysis and the decrease of the carbon content (68.5%) compared to the pyrolyzed samples (71.1% for Bamboo-500 and 75.9 for Bamboo-700), thus improving the adsorption properties of the materials. SEM analysis revealed that the activated bamboo (Bamboo-A-900) displayed smaller fiber size and numerous honeycombed macropores compared to the pyrolyzed biochars (Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700) enhancing gas diffusion kinetics. The presence of CaCO3 in Bamboo-700 and its absence in activated biochar suggests thermal decomposition during pyrolysis, releasing CO2 and leaving behind CaO. The heat of CO2 adsorption indicates that the bamboo family possesses a heterogeneous surface, as evidenced by the decrease in heat with increasing pressure. At very low pressure (<0.12 MPa), Bamboo-500 exhibits superior adsorption performance due to its lower heat of adsorption, a result of its less developed structure. In contrast, Bamboo-A-900 shows the highest adsorption performance at medium and high pressures, attributed to its large surface area, and presence of CaO, which interacts with CO2 molecules despite high CH4 adsorption capacity and heat of adsorption. Integrating biogas upgrading and bamboo utilization represents a significant step towards sustainable energy production and environmental responsibility. The activated sample Bamboo-A-900 enhances CO2 adsorption capacity, facilitating biogas purification. Therefore, raw bamboo is a viable biomass source, producing effective samples with favorable physicochemical characteristics that can help reduce the cost of biogas upgrading processes, making them more sustainable and economically viable for industrial applications.

5. Perspectives

Future studies should investigate chemical modifications to biochars and activated biochars to enhance adsorption performance, especially for CO2 separation in binary and ternary mixtures. For example, Bamboo-A-900 shows the highest BET surface area (1220 m2g−1) and substantial adsorption capacities for both CO2 and CH4 (8.0 ± 0.3 and 3.4 ± 0.2 mol kg−1, respectively). Conducting chemical modification of its surface with basic chemical materials can enhance the separation of CO2 over CH4, and therefore the selectivity. Additionally, the AAPI approach can be further explored for its application to other types of adsorbents to assess their potential for biogas upgrading. Furthermore, future studies should assess the performance of bamboo-derived adsorbents in real biogas conditions, taking into account impurities such as H2S and water vapor, which could influence the adsorption capacity and selectivity. For instance, moisture and H2S may reduce the effectiveness of adsorbents by interfering with the adsorption sites and altering the material properties. Studying these effects will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the adsorbents’ suitability for biogas upgrading under practical conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.A.; methodology, K.A.A., N.A.S., G.I.D., C.M.G., A.B. and F.M.; validation, K.A.A., C.H., C.M.G. and V.P.; formal analysis, K.A.A., N.A.S., G.I.D., F.M., C.M.G. and A.B.; investigation, K.A.A., N.A.S., C.M.G., A.B. and L.M.; resources, C.M.G., A.B. and C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A.A.; writing—review and editing, C.H., C.M.G. and V.P.; visualization, K.A.A.; supervision, C.H., V.P. and C.M.G.; funding acquisition, C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was carried under the framework of E2S UPPA supported by the “Investissements d’Avenir” French programme managed by ANR (ANR-16-IDEX-0002). Financial support for the BioCad project is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Gautier Schrodj (for TGA analyses), Jean-Marc Le Meins (for XRD analyses), and Cyril Vaulot (for adsorption analyses) via IS2M technical platforms.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CO2Carbon dioxide
CH4Methane
N2Nitrogen
CaOcalcium oxide
SiO2Silicon dioxide
CaCO3Calcium Carbonate
AAPIApproximate Adsorption Performance Indicator
SDGsSustainable Development Goals
TGAThermogravimetric Analysis
CODCrystallography Open Database
EDXEnergy Dispersive X-ray
XRDX-ray Diffraction (XRD)
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
BETBrunauer–Emmett-Teller
ASApproximate Selectivity

References

  1. Mohammed, M.A.; Mohd Yunus, N.Z.; Hezmi, M.A.; Abang Hasbollah, D.Z.; Rashid, A.S.A. Ground improvement and its role in carbon dioxide reduction: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 8968–8988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nguyen, T.T.H.; Phan, G.Q.; Tran, T.K.; Bui, H.M. The role of renewable energy technologies in enhancing human development: Empirical evidence from selected countries. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mao, C.; Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, G. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, M.; Song, W.; Buhain, J. Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 712–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yentekakis, I.V.; Goula, G. Biogas Management: Advanced Utilization for Production of Renewable Energy and Added-value Chemicals. Front. Environ. Sci. 2017, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Angelidaki, I.; Treu, L.; Tsapekos, P.; Luo, G.; Campanaro, S.; Wenzel, H.; Kougias, P.G. Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 452–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abd, A.A.; Naji, S.Z.; Hashim, A.S.; Othman, M.R. Carbon dioxide removal through physical adsorption using carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abd, A.A.; Othman, M.R.; Kim, J. A review on application of activated carbons for carbon dioxide capture: Present performance, preparation, and surface modification for further improvement. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 43329–43364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaliszewski, M.J.; Zgrzebnicki, M.; Kałamaga, A.; Pinjara, S.; Wróbel, R.J. Commercial Kevlar derived activated carbons for CO2 and C2H4 sorption. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2021, 23, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Staudt, J.; Musial, C.M.; Canevesi, R.; Fierro, V.; Ribeiro, C.; Alves, H.J.; Borba, C.E. Evaluation of the CH4/CO2 separation by adsorption on coconut shell activated carbon: Impact of the gas moisture on equilibrium selectivity and adsorption capacity. Heliyon 2024, 10, e30368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saadi, W.; Ruiz, B.; Najar-Souissi, S.; Ouederni, A.; Fuente, E. High-pressure gas adsorption on activated carbons from pomegranate peels biochar: A promising approach for biogas purification. Biomass Bioenergy 2024, 186, 107258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; Yin, H.; Wen, S.; Zhang, W.; Hu, S.; Sun, K.; Jiang, J.; Ji, X. Biogas upgrading using aqueous bamboo-derived activated carbons. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 419, 132055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Cui, Z.; Fu, Z.; Yang, L.; Liu, G.; Li, M. Coffee grounds derived N enriched microporous activated carbons: Efficient adsorbent for post-combustion CO2 capture and conversion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 578, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abou Alfa, K.; Meza-Sepulveda, D.C.; Vaulot, C.; Le Meins, J.M.; Ghimbeu, C.M.; Tonini, L.; Cubillos, J.A.; Moynault, L.; Platel, V.; Paredes, D.; et al. Cocoa Pod Husk Carbon Family for Biogas Upgrading: Preliminary Assessment Using the Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator. C 2024, 10, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mammarella, D.; Giuliano, A.D.; Freda, C.; Bari, I.D.; Gallucci, K. Upgrading of Biogas to Biomethane by Using Biochars as CO2 Sorbent in a Pressure Swing Adsorption Device. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2024, 109, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghanbarpour Mamaghani, Z.; Hawboldt, K.A.; MacQuarrie, S.; Katz, M.J. Wood biochar as a point source CO2 adsorbent-impact of humidity on performance. Fuel 2024, 361, 130737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, Z.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Du, Q.; Feng, D.; Dong, H.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xie, M. Ultra-microporous biochar-based carbon adsorbents by a facile chemical activation strategy for high-performance CO2 adsorption. Fuel Process. Technol. 2023, 241, 107613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghaemi, A.; Karimi Dehnavi, M.; Khoshraftar, Z. Exploring artificial neural network approach and RSM modeling in the prediction of CO2 capture using carbon molecular sieves. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 7, 100310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rainone, F.; D’Agostino, O.; Erto, A.; Balsamo, M.; Lancia, A. Biogas upgrading by adsorption onto activated carbon and carbon molecular sieves: Experimental and modelling study in binary CO2/CH4 mixture. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, G.; Angelidaki, I. Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2729–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grande, C.A. Biogas Upgrading by Pressure Swing Adsorption; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suyitno; Rosyadi, I.; Arifin, Z.; Sutardi, T.; Sunaryo; Ilminnafik, N. Advanced modification of natural zeolites for optimized biogas, syngas, and hydrogen production and purification. Cogent Eng. 2024, 11, 2398912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sidabutar, R.; Trisakti, B.; Irvan; Michael, M.; Vanness, V.; Alexander, V.; Natasya, Y.; Pasaribu, D.S.K.; Alamsyah, V.; Zaiyat, M.Z.Z.; et al. Synergistic integration of zeolite engineering and fixed-bed column design for enhanced biogas upgrading: Adsorbent synthesis, CO2/CH4 separation kinetics, and regeneration assessment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 355, 129772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shafawi, A.N.; Mohamed, A.R.; Lahijani, P.; Mohammadi, M. Recent advances in developing engineered biochar for CO2 capture: An insight into the biochar modification approaches. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sabouni, R.; Kazemian, H.; Rohani, S. Carbon dioxide capturing technologies: A review focusing on metal organic framework materials (MOFs). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 5427–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Adilina, I.B.; Widjaya, R.R.; Hidayati, L.N.; Supriadi, E.; Safaat, M.; Oemry, F.; Restiawaty, E.; Bindar, Y.; Parker, S.F. Understanding the Surface Characteristics of Biochar and Its Catalytic Activity for the Hydrodeoxygenation of Guaiacol. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuryntseva, P.; Karamova, K.; Galitskaya, P.; Selivanovskaya, S.; Evtugyn, G. Biochar Functions in Soil Depending on Feedstock and Pyrolyzation Properties with Particular Emphasis on Biological Properties. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, J.; Lin, J.; Luo, J.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, J.; Sun, S.; Shen, Y.; Ma, R. Enhanced CO2 capture performance of N, S co-doped biochar prepared by microwave pyrolysis: Synergistic modulation of microporous structure and functional groups. Fuel 2025, 379, 132987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Department of Economic and Social Affairs; Sustainable Development. The 17 GOALS |Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 9 January 2025).
  30. Daza Montaño, C.; Dam, J. Potential of Bamboo for Renewable Energy: Main Issues and Technology Options; International Bamboo and Rattan Organisation (INBAR): Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sharma, R.; Wahono, J.; Baral, H. Bamboo as an Alternative Bioenergy Crop and Powerful Ally for Land Restoration in Indonesia. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, Y.; Hao, R.; Qi, M. Integrative process of preoxidation and absorption for simultaneous removal of SO2, NO and Hg0. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 269, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ren, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Xie, M.; Jiang, Z. Cement-based composite with humidity adsorption and formaldehyde removal functions as an indoor wall material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yue, X.; Ma, N.L.; Sonne, C.; Guan, R.; Lam, S.S.; Van Le, Q.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y.; Gu, H.; Rinklebe, J.; et al. Mitigation of indoor air pollution: A review of recent advances in adsorption materials and catalytic oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ismail, I.S.; Rashidi, N.A.; Yusup, S. Production and characterization of bamboo-based activated carbon through single-step H3PO4 activation for CO2 capture. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 12434–12440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhou, Y. Preparation and adsorption performances of mesopore-enriched bamboo activated carbon. Front. Chem. Eng. China 2008, 2, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khuong, D.A.; Trinh, K.T.; Nakaoka, Y.; Tsubota, T.; Tashima, D.; Nguyen, H.N.; Tanaka, D. The investigation of activated carbon by K2CO3 activation: Micropores- and macropores-dominated structure. Chemosphere 2022, 299, 134365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khuong, D.A.; Nguyen, H.N.; Tsubota, T. Activated carbon produced from bamboo and solid residue by CO2 activation utilized as CO2 adsorbents. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 148, 106039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ying, W.; Tian, S.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Z.; Kapeso, G.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, W. In Situ Dry Chemical Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Activated Carbon from Bamboo Charcoal for Carbon Dioxide Adsorption. Materials 2022, 15, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kalderis, D.; Seifi, A.; Kieu Trang, T.; Tsubota, T.; Anastopoulos, I.; Manariotis, I.; Pashalidis, I.; Khataee, A. Bamboo-derived adsorbents for environmental remediation: A review of recent progress. Environ. Res. 2023, 224, 115533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abou Alfa, K.; Peredo-Mancilla, D.; Platel, V.; Hort, C. Evaluation of the Performance of an Activated Carbon’s family for Biogas Upgrading using the Adsorption Performance Indicator. In Trends in Clean Energy Research. Green Energy and Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  42. Binte Razzak, N.R.; Milne, N.A.; Moon, E.M. Conversion of municipal garden waste to activated carbon: Laboratory production and characterization comparing production parameters. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024, 299, 120487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chatterjee, R.; Sajjadi, B.; Chen, W.Y.; Mattern, D.L.; Hammer, N.; Raman, V.; Dorris, A. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on PhysicoChemical Properties and Acoustic-Based Amination of Biochar for Efficient CO2 Adsorption. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, T.; Walawender, W.P.; Fan, L.T.; Fan, M.; Daugaard, D.; Brown, R.C. Preparation of activated carbon from forest and agricultural residues through CO2 activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 105, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, W.; Yang, H.; Chen, H. The structure evolution of biochar from biomass pyrolysis and its correlation with gas pollutant adsorption performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Peredo-Mancilla, D.; Ghouma, I.; Hort, C.; Ghimbeu, C.M.; Jeguirim, M.; Bessieres, D. CO2 and CH4 Adsorption Behavior of Biomass-Based Activated Carbons. Energies 2018, 11, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ho, B.N.; Pino-Perez, D.; Matei Ghimbeu, C.; Diaz, J.; Peredo-Mancilla, D.; Hort, C.; Bessieres, D. Determination of methane, ethane and propane on activated carbons by experimental pressure swing adsorption method. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2021, 95, 104124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peredo-Mancilla, D.; Hort, C.; Jeguirim, M.; Ghimbeu, C.M.; Limousy, L.; Bessieres, D. Experimental Determination of the CH4 and CO2 Pure Gas Adsorption Isotherms on Different Activated Carbons. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2018, 63, 3027–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Iragena Dushime, G.; Bachelart, J.; Abou Alfa, K.; Ghimbeu, C.; Hort, C.; Platel, V. New Promising Modified Activated Carbons for CH4 and CO2 Adsorption. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Environment Sciences and Renewable Energy, Chengdu, China, 27–29 May 2022; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  50. Knaebel, K.S. For your next separation consider adsorption. Chem. Eng. 1995, 102, 92. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rege, S.U.; Yang, R.T. A Simple Parameter for Selecting an Adsorbent for Gas Separation by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2001, 36, 3355–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ackley, M.W. Multilayer Adsorbent Beds for Psa Gas Separation. CA CA2234924C, 17 October 1998. [Google Scholar]
  53. Baksh, M.S.A.; Notaro, F. Method for Production of Nitrogen Using Oxygen Selective Adsorbents. EP EP0853968A1, 22 July 1998. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wiersum, A.D.; Chang, J.S.; Serre, C.; Llewellyn, P.L. An Adsorbent Performance Indicator as a First Step Evaluation of Novel Sorbents for Gas Separations: Application to Metal-Organic Frameworks. Langmuir 2013, 29, 3301–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wei, M.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, Q.; Li, L.; Zhong, Z. A new comprehensive evaluation indicator of adsorbent for gas separation. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 1624–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sahoo, S.S.; Vijay, V.K.; Chandra, R.; Kumar, H. Production and characterization of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of pigeon pea stalk and bamboo. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 3, 100101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ji, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.J.; Xie, P.F.; Wu, C.; Jiang, L. A high adsorption capacity bamboo biochar for CO2 capture for low temperature heat utilization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 293, 121131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Korus, A.; Gutierrez, J.P.; Szlęk, A.; Jagiello, J.; Hornung, A. Pore development during CO2 and H2O activation associated with the catalytic role of inherent inorganics in sewage sludge char and its performance during the reforming of volatiles. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Steiner, C. Considerations in Biochar Characterization. In Agricultural and Environmental Applications of Biochar: Advances and Barriers; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tsai, W.T.; Hsu, C.H.; Lin, Y.Q.; Tsai, C.H.; Chen, W.S.; Chang, Y.T. Enhancing the Pore Properties and Adsorption Performance of Cocoa Pod Husk (CPH)-Derived Biochars via Post-Acid Treatment. Processes 2020, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, K.; Li, H.; Xiao, L.P.; Wang, B.; Sun, R.C.; Song, G. Sequential utilization of bamboo biomass through reductive catalytic fractionation of lignin. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 285, 121335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kujawska, J.; Wojtaś, E.; Charmas, B. Biochar Derived from Sewage Sludge: The Impact of Pyrolysis Temperature on Chemical Properties and Agronomic Potential. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Seow, Y.X.; Tan, Y.H.; Mubarak, N.M.; Kansedo, J.; Khalid, M.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Ghasemi, M. A review on biochar production from different biomass wastes by recent carbonization technologies and its sustainable applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mukome, F.N.D.; Zhang, X.; Silva, L.C.R.; Six, J.; Parikh, S.J. Use of Chemical and Physical Characteristics to Investigate Trends in Biochar Feedstocks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2196–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, G.; Xu, Q.; Dong, X.; Yang, J.; Pile Knapp, L.; Wang, G.; Wang, F. Effect of Protective Gas and Pyrolysis Temperature on the Biochar Produced from Three Plants of Gramineae: Physical and Chemical Characterization. Waste Biomass Valorization 2016, 7, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tsai, W.T.; Liu, S.C.; Chen, H.R.; Chang, Y.M.; Tsai, Y.L. Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Waqas, M.; Aburizaiza, A.; Miandad, R.; Rehan, M.; Barakat, M.; Nizami, D.A.S. Development of Biochar as Fuel and Catalyst in Energy Recovery Technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 188, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mašek, O.; Brownsort, P.; Cross, A.; Sohi, S. Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar. Fuel 2013, 103, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yu, S.; Park, J.; Kim, M.; Ryu, C.; Park, J. Characterization of biochar and byproducts from slow pyrolysis of hinoki cypress. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 6, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qiu, C.; Jiang, L.; Gao, Y.; Sheng, L. Effects of oxygen-containing functional groups on carbon materials in supercapacitors: A review. Mater. Des. 2023, 230, 111952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Waters, C.L.; Janupala, R.R.; Mallinson, R.G.; Lobban, L.L. Staged thermal fractionation for segregation of lignin and cellulose pyrolysis products: An experimental study of residence time and temperature effects. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 126, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Park, J.; Hung, I.; Gan, Z.; Rojas, O.J.; Lim, K.H.; Park, S. Activated carbon from biochar: Influence of its physicochemical properties on the sorption characteristics of phenanthrene. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 149, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Palniandy, L.K.; Yoon, L.W.; Wong, W.Y.; Yong, S.T.; Pang, M.M. Application of Biochar Derived from Different Types of Biomass and Treatment Methods as a Fuel Source for Direct Carbon Fuel Cells. Energies 2019, 12, 2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Qiu, T.; Yang, J.G.; Bai, X.J.; Wang, Y.L. The preparation of synthetic graphite materials with hierarchical pores from lignite by one-step impregnation and their characterization as dye absorbents. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 12737–12746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, W.; Zhu, Y. Structural Characteristics of Coal Vitrinite during Pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 3645–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jena, L.; Soren, D.; Deheri, P.K.; Pattojoshi, P. Preparation, characterization and optical properties evaluations of bamboo charcoal. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pusarapu, V.; Narayana Sarma, R.; Ochonma, P.; Gadikota, G. Sustainable co-production of porous graphitic carbon and synthesis gas from biomass resources. NPJ Mater. Sustain. 2024, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Katuwal, S.; Ashworth, A.J.; Rafsan, N.A.S.; Kolar, P. Characterization of Poultry Litter Biochar and Activated Biochar as a Soil Amendment for Valorization. Biomass 2022, 2, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Değermenci, G.D.; Değermenci, N.; Ayvaoğlu, V.; Durmaz, E.; Çakır, D.; Akan, E. Adsorption of reactive dyes on lignocellulosic waste; characterization, equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 225, 1220–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Donohue, M.; Aranovich, G. Classification of Gibbs adsorption isotherms. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 76, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, Z.; Zhang, F.S. Removal of copper (II) and phenol from aqueous solution using porous carbons derived from hydrothermal chars. Desalination 2011, 267, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Derylo-Marczewska, A.; Buczek, B.; Swiatkowski, A. Effect of oxygen surface groups on adsorption of benzene derivatives from aqueous solutions onto active carbon samples. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 9466–9472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wei, H.; Deng, S.; Hu, B.; Chen, Z.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Granular Bamboo-Derived Activated Carbon for High CO2 Adsorption: The Dominant Role of Narrow Micropores. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 2354–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A.B. CO2 adsorption by activated templated carbons. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 366, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Negara, D.N.K.P.; Nindhia, T.G.T.; Surata, I.W.; Hidajat, F.; Sucipta, M. Nanopore structures, surface morphology, and adsorption capacity of tabah bamboo-activated carbons. Surf. Interfaces 2019, 16, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Peredo-Mancilla, D.; Ghouma, I.; Hort, C.; Bessieres, D.; Ghimbeu, C.M. 9—Gas storage. In Char and Carbon Materials Derived from Biomass; Jeguirim, M., Limousy, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 341–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ahmad, M.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Lim, J.E.; Zhang, M.; Bolan, N.; Mohan, D.; Vithanage, M.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Singh, V.K.; Anil Kumar, E. Measurement and analysis of adsorption isotherms of CO2 on activated carbon. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 97, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rashidi, N.A.; Yusup, S.; Lam, H.L. Kinetic Studies on Carbon Dioxide Capture using Activated Carbon. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2013, 35, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gunawan, T.; Wijiyanti, R.; Widiastuti, N. Adsorption-desorption of CO2 on zeolite-Y-templated carbon at various temperatures. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 41594–41602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Dong, K.; Zhai, Z.; Guo, A. Effects of Pore Parameters and Functional Groups in Coal on CO2/CH4 Adsorption. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 32395–32407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Rallapalli, P.; Prasanth, K.P.; Patil, D.; Somani, R.S.; Jasra, R.V.; Bajaj, H.C. Sorption studies of CO2, CH4, N2, CO, O2 and Ar on nanoporous aluminum terephthalate [MIL-53(Al)]. J. Porous Mater. 2011, 18, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, S.; Lu, L.; Wu, D.; Lu, X.; Cao, W.; Yang, T.; Zhu, Y. Molecular Simulation Study of the Adsorption and Diffusion of a Mixture of CO2/CH4 in Activated Carbon: Effect of Textural Properties and Surface Chemistry. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2016, 61, 4139–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Yang, H.; Feng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, H. Nitrogen enriched biochar modified by high temperature CO2—Ammonia treatment: Characterization and adsorption of CO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 257, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, X.; Wu, J.; Yang, H.; Shao, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chen, H. Preparation of nitrogen-doped microporous modified biochar by high temperature CO2–NH3 treatment for CO2 adsorption: Effects of temperature. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 98157–98166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Blanco, A.A.G.; de Oliveira, J.C.A.; López, R.; Moreno-Piraján, J.C.; Giraldo, L.; Zgrablich, G.; Sapag, K. A study of the pore size distribution for activated carbon monoliths and their relationship with the storage of methane and hydrogen. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2010, 357, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zheng, H.; He, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, L.; Cui, X. Novel procedure of CO2 capture of the CaO sorbent activator on the reaction of one-part alkali-activated slag. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 12476–12483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Xie, X.; Li, M.; Lin, D.; Li, B.; Li, C.; Liu, D. CO2 Adsorption by Bamboo Biochars Obtained via a Salt-Assisted Pyrolysis Route. Separations 2024, 11, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mukherjee, A.; Borugadda, V.B.; Dynes, J.J.; Niu, C.; Dalai, A.K. Carbon dioxide capture from flue gas in biochar produced from spent coffee grounds: Effect of surface chemistry and porous structure. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lahijani, P.; Mohammadi, M.; Mohamed, A.R. Metal incorporated biochar as a potential adsorbent for high capacity CO2 capture at ambient condition. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 26, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Madzaki, H.; KarimGhani, W.A.W.A.; NurZalikhaRebitanim; AzilBahariAlias. Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on Sawdust Biochar. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. González, A.S.; Plaza, M.G.; Rubiera, F.; Pevida, C. Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 230, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zgrzebnicki, M.; Kałamaga, A.; Wrobel, R. Sorption and Textural Properties of Activated Carbon Derived from Charred Beech Wood. Molecules 2021, 26, 7604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zubbri, N.A.; Mohamed, A.R.; Kamiuchi, N.; Mohammadi, M. Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on biochar sorbent modified by metal incorporation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 11809–11829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sethupathi, S.; Zhang, M.; Rajapaksha, A.U.; Lee, S.R.; Mohamad Nor, N.; Mohamed, A.R.; Al-Wabel, M.; Lee, S.S.; Ok, Y.S. Biochars as Potential Adsorbers of CH4, CO2 and H2S. Sustainability 2017, 9, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ding, S.; Liu, Y. Adsorption of CO2 from flue gas by novel seaweed-based KOH-activated porous biochars. Fuel 2020, 260, 116382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bedia, J.; Peñas-Garzón, M.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Belver, C. A Review on the Synthesis and Characterization of Biomass-Derived Carbons for Adsorption of Emerging Contaminants from Water. C 2018, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation of biochars and activated biochar from raw bamboo.
Figure 1. Preparation of biochars and activated biochar from raw bamboo.
Sustainability 17 01445 g001
Figure 2. SEM morphology of (A) Bamboo-500, (B) Bamboo-700, and (C) Bamboo-A-900 at three different magnification ranges (500 μm, 200 μm, and 100 μm).
Figure 2. SEM morphology of (A) Bamboo-500, (B) Bamboo-700, and (C) Bamboo-A-900 at three different magnification ranges (500 μm, 200 μm, and 100 μm).
Sustainability 17 01445 g002
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric analysis curves for the raw, pyrolysed and activated biochar performed (a) under N2 for Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700, and N2 following by air for raw bamboo, (b) under air for Bamboo-500, Bamboo-700, and Bamboo-A-900.
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric analysis curves for the raw, pyrolysed and activated biochar performed (a) under N2 for Bamboo-500 and Bamboo-700, and N2 following by air for raw bamboo, (b) under air for Bamboo-500, Bamboo-700, and Bamboo-A-900.
Sustainability 17 01445 g003
Figure 4. XRD analysis of the bamboo materials. ☐ SiO2, ○ CaCO3, and ✩ CaO.
Figure 4. XRD analysis of the bamboo materials. ☐ SiO2, ○ CaCO3, and ✩ CaO.
Sustainability 17 01445 g004
Figure 5. (a) N2-adsorption–desorption isotherms of Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 (N2, 77 K). (b) Pore size distribution of Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 based on N2 adsorption at 77 K using 2D-NLDFT.
Figure 5. (a) N2-adsorption–desorption isotherms of Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 (N2, 77 K). (b) Pore size distribution of Bamboo-700 and Bamboo-A-900 based on N2 adsorption at 77 K using 2D-NLDFT.
Sustainability 17 01445 g005
Figure 6. Heat of adsorption of the bamboo materials at 303 K as a function of pressure.
Figure 6. Heat of adsorption of the bamboo materials at 303 K as a function of pressure.
Sustainability 17 01445 g006
Figure 7. CO2 and CH4 pure gas adsorption isotherms of the bamboo family at 303 K versus pressure.
Figure 7. CO2 and CH4 pure gas adsorption isotherms of the bamboo family at 303 K versus pressure.
Sustainability 17 01445 g007
Figure 8. Alteration of Bamboo-A-900’s chemical surface by the reaction between CaO and CO2 during CO2 adsorption under ambiant conditions.
Figure 8. Alteration of Bamboo-A-900’s chemical surface by the reaction between CaO and CO2 during CO2 adsorption under ambiant conditions.
Sustainability 17 01445 g008
Figure 9. AAPI values of the bamboo family at 303 K versus pressure. Uncertainty calculated using the propagation of errors formula.
Figure 9. AAPI values of the bamboo family at 303 K versus pressure. Uncertainty calculated using the propagation of errors formula.
Sustainability 17 01445 g009
Table 1. Product yields of bamboo biochars obtained by pyrolysis.
Table 1. Product yields of bamboo biochars obtained by pyrolysis.
BiocharsBiochar Yield (%)Tars Yield (%)Gas Yield (%)
Bamboo-50029.432.338.3
Bamboo-70027.559.612.9
Table 2. Chemical and textural properties of the bamboo family.
Table 2. Chemical and textural properties of the bamboo family.
Elemental Analysis by EDX (wt.%)Raw BiomassBamboo-500Bamboo-700Bamboo-A-900
Carbonn.a71.175.968.5
Oxygenn.a23.117.320.2
Siliconn.a34.17.5
Potassiumn.a1.71.42.2
Calciumn.a0.30.60.4
Sulfurn.a0.20.30.5
Magnesiumn.a0.30.20.4
Phosphorusn.a0.10.10.1
Aluminiumn.a0.2--
Coppern.a-0.10.1
Manganesen.a--0.1
Total Organic Elementsn.a94.593.689.3
Total Inorganic Elementsn.a5.56.410.7
Proximate analysis (wt.%)
Moisture7.25.27.4n.a
Volatiles75.116.15.1n.a
Fixed carbon13.46574.5n.a
Ash4.313.71334.1
Textural properties 
S B E T (N2) (m2g−1)n.an.a3651220
Vt (cm3 g−1)n.an.a0.160.6
V m i c r o (cm3g−1)n.an.a0.090.34
V m e s o (cm3g−1)n.an.a0.070.26
D p o r e (nm)n.an.a0.960.73
Table 3. Consolidated data from elemental analysis and adsorption parameters of bamboo-derived adsorbents at 1.9 MPa.
Table 3. Consolidated data from elemental analysis and adsorption parameters of bamboo-derived adsorbents at 1.9 MPa.
ParameterBamboo-500Bamboo-700Bamboo-A-900
Carbon (wt.%)71.175.968.5
Oxygen (wt.%)23.117.320.2
SBET (m2 g−1)n.a3651220
AdC (CO2) (mol kg−1)1.9 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.18.0 ± 0.3
AS2.4 ± 0.32.6 ± 0.12.4 ± 0.2
Δ H a d s , C O 2 (kJ mol−1)14.7 ± 1.114.2 ± 1.316 ± 1
AAPI0.4 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.25.4 ± 0.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abou Alfa, K.; Abou Saleh, N.; Beda, A.; Matei Ghimbeu, C.; Iragena Dushime, G.; Marias, F.; Moynault, L.; Platel, V.; Hort, C. Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator in Evaluating Sustainable Bamboo-Derived Adsorbents for Biogas Upgrading. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041445

AMA Style

Abou Alfa K, Abou Saleh N, Beda A, Matei Ghimbeu C, Iragena Dushime G, Marias F, Moynault L, Platel V, Hort C. Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator in Evaluating Sustainable Bamboo-Derived Adsorbents for Biogas Upgrading. Sustainability. 2025; 17(4):1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abou Alfa, Khaled, Nour Abou Saleh, Adrian Beda, Camélia Matei Ghimbeu, Grace Iragena Dushime, Frederic Marias, Laurent Moynault, Vincent Platel, and Cecile Hort. 2025. "Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator in Evaluating Sustainable Bamboo-Derived Adsorbents for Biogas Upgrading" Sustainability 17, no. 4: 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041445

APA Style

Abou Alfa, K., Abou Saleh, N., Beda, A., Matei Ghimbeu, C., Iragena Dushime, G., Marias, F., Moynault, L., Platel, V., & Hort, C. (2025). Approximate Adsorption Performance Indicator in Evaluating Sustainable Bamboo-Derived Adsorbents for Biogas Upgrading. Sustainability, 17(4), 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop