Next Article in Journal
Automating Building Energy Performance Simulation with EnergyPlus Using Modular JSON–Python Workflows: A Case Study of the Hilton Watford Hotel
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Residents’ Perceptions of Tourism in Major Spanish Cities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Multi-Method Approach to China and the United States

1
School of Economics and Management, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Liechtenstein Business School, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, 9490 Vaduz, Liechtenstein
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 10315; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210315
Submission received: 8 October 2025 / Revised: 9 November 2025 / Accepted: 13 November 2025 / Published: 18 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)

Abstract

The increasing importance of sustainability reporting requires a deeper understanding of how companies communicate their sustainability efforts across regions and sectors. This study focuses on China and the United States as subjects. By analyzing corporate sustainability reports from these two major economies in 2022, it evaluates the effects of regional and sectoral differences on sustainable practices, with the aim of deepening the understanding of organizational sustainability. Using topic modeling, this study identified the key topics and patterns that companies in the two countries prioritize in their corporate sustainability reporting. A bag-of-words approach was adopted to analyze the attitudes of corporations in two countries toward environmental, social, and governance dimensions, with a focus on sector-specific differences. Finally, sentiment analysis with ClimateBERT assessed the tone of the reports. The findings reveal similarities and sector-specific differences in corporate sustainability reporting between China and the United States, as well as displaying divergent emphases on climate-related risks and opportunities. This study offers a multi-method approach to evaluating corporate sustainability reporting, contributing to a better understanding of sustainability practices in different national and industrial contexts, and offering effective guidance for actual industry regulators and stakeholders.
Keywords: sustainability; text mining; non-financial reporting; performance sustainability; text mining; non-financial reporting; performance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, Q.; Knapp, D.; Brecht, L.; Eckert, R. A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Multi-Method Approach to China and the United States. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210315

AMA Style

Meng Q, Knapp D, Brecht L, Eckert R. A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Multi-Method Approach to China and the United States. Sustainability. 2025; 17(22):10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Qiao, Daniel Knapp, Leo Brecht, and Roland Eckert. 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Multi-Method Approach to China and the United States" Sustainability 17, no. 22: 10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210315

APA Style

Meng, Q., Knapp, D., Brecht, L., & Eckert, R. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Multi-Method Approach to China and the United States. Sustainability, 17(22), 10315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop