Previous Article in Journal
The Synergistic Development of Agricultural Chemical Emissions Reduction and Food Production Based on Decoupling and LMDI Models: A Case Study of Shandong Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

What Kind of Urban Spatial Form Is More Conducive to Disaster Risk Reduction: An Empirical Analysis from 32 Cities in China

1
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2
Key Laboratory of New Technique for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400045, China
3
Key Laboratory of Monitoring, Evaluation and Early Warning of Territorial Spatial Planning Implementation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing 401147, China
4
School of Architecture, State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
5
Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
6
Faculty of Architectural Engineering, Latakia University, The 7th Project, Tartous City, Syria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 10291; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210291 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 5 November 2025 / Accepted: 10 November 2025 / Published: 17 November 2025

Abstract

As urban disasters intensify, the relationship between urban spatial form and disaster risk is increasingly important. Different spatial configurations reflect varying levels of resilience to disasters. However existing research offers limited quantitative evidence linking spatial form indicators and disaster risk indices. This study addresses this gap by developing a quantifiable, city-scale framework to analyze the form–risk relationship across 32 Chinese cities. Urban spatial form is quantified using fractal dimension to measure boundary complexity and compactness to assess internal structure, supplemented by a diagrammatic classification of urban patterns. A comprehensive disaster risk index is developed based on four dimensions: hazards, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. Regression analysis is then applied to quantify the direction and magnitude of correlations between spatial-form indicators and the comprehensive risk index. The results reveal three major findings: (1) Disaster risk increases with fractal dimension, indicating that cities with more complex and irregular boundaries tend to be more vulnerable. In contrast, compactness has no statistically significant effect on disaster risk. (2) Spatial patterns are strongly associated with risk levels: cluster-type and block-type cities generally experience lower risks than radial-type and constellation-type cities. (3) City size and geography also influence risk, as larger cities typically exhibit lower risks, whereas southern cities face higher risks than those in northern regions. These results highlight the critical role of urban spatial structure in shaping disaster resilience. Managing boundary complexity, fostering polycentric and block-based spatial layouts, and improving road-network redundancy can effectively enhance urban adaptive capacity. These insights provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for resilience-oriented spatial optimization and disaster-risk reduction in vulnerable cities.
Keywords: urban resilience; urban spatial form; disaster risk; fractal dimension; resilience strategies urban resilience; urban spatial form; disaster risk; fractal dimension; resilience strategies

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Gou, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Fang, C.; Wang, Z.; Rahmoun, T. What Kind of Urban Spatial Form Is More Conducive to Disaster Risk Reduction: An Empirical Analysis from 32 Cities in China. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210291

AMA Style

Li Y, Gou M, Wang Y, Wang B, Fang C, Wang Z, Rahmoun T. What Kind of Urban Spatial Form Is More Conducive to Disaster Risk Reduction: An Empirical Analysis from 32 Cities in China. Sustainability. 2025; 17(22):10291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yunyan, Menghan Gou, Yanhong Wang, Binyan Wang, Chenhao Fang, Ziyi Wang, and Tarek Rahmoun. 2025. "What Kind of Urban Spatial Form Is More Conducive to Disaster Risk Reduction: An Empirical Analysis from 32 Cities in China" Sustainability 17, no. 22: 10291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210291

APA Style

Li, Y., Gou, M., Wang, Y., Wang, B., Fang, C., Wang, Z., & Rahmoun, T. (2025). What Kind of Urban Spatial Form Is More Conducive to Disaster Risk Reduction: An Empirical Analysis from 32 Cities in China. Sustainability, 17(22), 10291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop