Next Article in Journal
Mindful Consumption and Sustainability Values: Shaping Purchase Intentions and Well-Being Among Generation Z
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Maturity and Resilient Cities: A Coupling System for Sustainable Development of Chinese Cities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Eco-Friendly Paradigm Shift in Shipping and Shipbuilding: Policy–Technology Linkages as Key Drivers

1
Ocean Policy & Planning Strategy Center, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
2
Division of Navigation Convergence Studies, College of Maritime Sciences, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9733; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219733 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 October 2025 / Revised: 20 October 2025 / Accepted: 21 October 2025 / Published: 31 October 2025

Abstract

The decarbonization of shipping and shipbuilding is a critical challenge under the Inter-national Maritime Organization’s (IMO) 2030 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and 2050 net-zero strategy, requiring effective coordination between policy and technology. This study investigates how Japan, China, and Korea respond to these regulatory pressures by systematically analyzing their policy–technology linkages. A four-stage design was applied, combining qualitative case studies, policy–technology mapping, theoretical interpretation, and comparative analysis, to trace how national strategies shape eco-friendly transitions. Japan employs an innovation-led, institution-convergent model in which technological demonstrations drive institutional adaptation and diffusion, China follows a policy-designated, execution-oriented model where state-led interventions accelerate commercialization, and Korea adopts a coordination-based, cyclical model balancing public demonstrations, financial support, and international standardization to reduce transition costs. These findings demonstrate that sequencing between policy–technology linkage is context-dependent, shaped by technological maturity, economic feasibility and infrastructure, institutional predictability, and socio-environmental acceptance. The study contributes a cyclic co-evolutionary perspective that moves beyond technological or institutional determinism, reconceptualizes regulation as enabling infra-structure, and identifies implications for global standard-setting and industrial competitiveness. The insights inform practical strategies for major shipbuilding nations to reduce costs while sustaining competitiveness under the IMO’s decarbonization framework.
Keywords: maritime decarbonization; eco-friendly ship; IMO GHG strategy; policy–technology interaction; paradigm shift maritime decarbonization; eco-friendly ship; IMO GHG strategy; policy–technology interaction; paradigm shift

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Lim, S.-S.; Chun, K.W. The Eco-Friendly Paradigm Shift in Shipping and Shipbuilding: Policy–Technology Linkages as Key Drivers. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219733

AMA Style

Lee H-Y, Lee C-H, Lim S-S, Chun KW. The Eco-Friendly Paradigm Shift in Shipping and Shipbuilding: Policy–Technology Linkages as Key Drivers. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219733

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Hae-Yeon, Chang-Hee Lee, Sang-Seop Lim, and Kang Woo Chun. 2025. "The Eco-Friendly Paradigm Shift in Shipping and Shipbuilding: Policy–Technology Linkages as Key Drivers" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219733

APA Style

Lee, H.-Y., Lee, C.-H., Lim, S.-S., & Chun, K. W. (2025). The Eco-Friendly Paradigm Shift in Shipping and Shipbuilding: Policy–Technology Linkages as Key Drivers. Sustainability, 17(21), 9733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219733

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop