Next Article in Journal
Research on Regional Disparities and Determinants of Carbon Emission Efficiency: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Eco-Innovation and Environmental Management Accounting in Fostering Performance Effect by Green Dynamic Capabilities in the Hotel Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia

by
Seung-Jun Lee
1,
Tae-Yun Kim
1,
Jun-Sik Cho
2,3,
Ji-Sung Kim
4 and
Hong-Sik Yun
1,*
1
Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
2
Disaster & Risk Management Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis & Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
3
New Airport Promotion Team, Korea Airports Corporation, 78 Haneul-gil, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07505, Republic of Korea
4
School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9488; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219488 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 August 2025 / Revised: 6 October 2025 / Accepted: 10 October 2025 / Published: 24 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)

Abstract

The global transition to renewable energy requires hybrid solutions that address variability while delivering tangible co-benefits and verifiable mitigation outcomes. This study evaluates a novel small hydropower–photovoltaic (SHP–PV) hybrid system in the Kyrgyz Republic that integrates flexible Bitcoin mining loads and waste-heat recovery for greenhouse heating. A techno-economic model was developed for a 10 MW configuration, allocating annual net generation of 57.34 GWh between grid export and on-site mining through a single decision parameter. Mitigation accounting applies a combined margin grid factor of 0.4–0.7 tCO2/MWh for exported electricity and a diesel factor of 0.26–0.27 tCO2/MWh_fuel for heat displacement, yielding Article 6–eligible reductions from both electricity and recovered heat. Waste-heat recovery from mining supplies ≈15 MWh_th/year to a 50 m2 greenhouse, displacing diesel use and demonstrating visible sustainable development co-benefits. Economic analysis reproduces annual revenues of ≈$1.9 million, with a levelized cost of electricity of $48/MWh and an indicative IRR of ~6%, consistent with positive but modest returns under merchant operation and uplift potential under mixed allocations. This study concludes that componentized accounting—exported electricity credited under grid displacement and diesel displacement credited from recovered heat—ensures Article 6 integrity and positions SHP–PV hybrids as replicable, multi-service renewable models for Central Asia. Unlike prior hybrid studies that treat generation, economics, and mitigation separately, our framework integrates allocation (α), financial outcomes, and Article 6 carbon accounting within a unified structure, while explicitly modeling Bitcoin mining as an endogenous flexible load with thermal recovery—advancing methodological approaches for multi-service renewable systems in climate policy contexts.
Keywords: article 6 carbon markets; flexible demand (bitcoin mining); hybrid renewable systems; photovoltaics (pv); small hydropower (shp); techno-economic analysis; waste-heat recovery article 6 carbon markets; flexible demand (bitcoin mining); hybrid renewable systems; photovoltaics (pv); small hydropower (shp); techno-economic analysis; waste-heat recovery

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, S.-J.; Kim, T.-Y.; Cho, J.-S.; Kim, J.-S.; Yun, H.-S. Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219488

AMA Style

Lee S-J, Kim T-Y, Cho J-S, Kim J-S, Yun H-S. Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Seung-Jun, Tae-Yun Kim, Jun-Sik Cho, Ji-Sung Kim, and Hong-Sik Yun. 2025. "Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219488

APA Style

Lee, S.-J., Kim, T.-Y., Cho, J.-S., Kim, J.-S., & Yun, H.-S. (2025). Hybrid Hydropower–PV with Mining Flexibility and Heat Recovery: Article 6-Ready Mitigation Pathways in Central Asia. Sustainability, 17(21), 9488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop