Next Article in Journal
Digital Inclusive Finance and Social Sustainability: Examining Entrepreneurial Pathways and Performance Among China’s Migrant Population for Inclusive Growth
Previous Article in Journal
Problems of Synurbization—Wild Boar in the City
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Drag Effect of Land Resources on New-Type Urbanization: Evidence from China’s Top 10 City Clusters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Study on the Master Planning of the Sustainable Global Contents City for the Redevelopment of Daegu K-2

1
Department of Architecture, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
2
School of Architecture, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan 50604, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(20), 8989; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208989
Submission received: 14 September 2025 / Revised: 6 October 2025 / Accepted: 8 October 2025 / Published: 10 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Urban Development and Land Use)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose and critically assess a sustainable urban regeneration model for the redevelopment of the former K-2 military airbase in Daegu, Korea. Large-scale idle military sites pose significant challenges in terms of ecological remediation, social integration, and economic transformation, but also offer opportunities for redefining urban identity and global competitiveness. To address this, we develop the concept of the “Global Contents City,” a planning framework that integrates cultural exchange, creative industries, education, and tourism within a sustainable urban ecosystem. The research employs a qualitative methodology that combines theoretical review, comparative analysis of international precedents (e.g., Munich-Riem, Tempelhof, Stapleton, and Toronto), and design-oriented masterplanning. The findings highlight design strategies that spatially interconnect cultural, educational, industrial, and ecological functions while reinforcing low-carbon infrastructure and green open space. By situating the Daegu K-2 case in an international context, the study demonstrates how lessons from post-military redevelopments can be adapted to Korea, contributing to both scholarly debates and practical frameworks for sustainable city-making.

1. Introduction

The redevelopment of large-scale idle military sites has become a central issue in contemporary urban regeneration, as cities worldwide seek to transform surplus land into sustainable assets that advance cultural, economic, and ecological objectives [1,2,3,4]. In Korea, these challenges are intensified by rapid urbanization, demographic decline, and the persistence of military installations within the urban fabric. The relocation of the K-2 Airbase in Daegu represents one of the nation’s most critical opportunities for transformation.
Daegu, once an industrial hub with strong textile, machinery, and medical clusters, has faced structural decline, youth outmigration, and limited cultural visibility compared to Seoul and Busan [5,6]. These dynamics highlight the urgent need for redevelopment strategies that extend beyond conventional brownfield regeneration to address questions of competitiveness, identity, and livability. Daegu’s geographical advantages—its position in the southeastern economic belt, proximity to the planned new airport, and potential integration into national innovation corridors—present unique opportunities to reposition the city within both domestic and global networks [7,8,9].
Accordingly, the redevelopment of the K-2 site should be framed not as a mere exercise in land reuse but as a strategic intervention that aligns ecological restoration with cultural, educational, and industrial revitalization. This approach positions the project as a catalyst for reimagining Daegu’s role in Korea’s urban hierarchy and enhancing its global competitiveness.

1.1. Background and Objectives of the Design

The relocation of the Daegu K-2 Airbase has created one of the largest urban voids in Korea, producing a 7 km2 site adjacent to the city center. While this transformation threatens continuity in Daegu’s spatial structure, it also provides an unprecedented opportunity to reimagine the city’s future trajectory [10]. The site’s location, infrastructure, and linkages with the integrated new airport situate it as a national and regional asset. However, redevelopment also raises complex issues, including soil remediation, financing, governance, and social consensus [11,12]. International cases such as Munich-Riem in Germany, Tempelhof in Berlin, Toronto’s brownfield redevelopments, and Stapleton in Denver illustrate how military and industrial lands can be transformed into vibrant urban districts [1,2,3,4]. Concurrently, they highlight recurring barriers, including high remediation costs, conflicts among stakeholders, and the need for long-term governance [2,4].
Against this backdrop, the objectives of this study are twofold. First, it conceptualizes the “Global Contents City” as a sustainable regeneration model that embeds cultural exchange, creative industries, education, and tourism into a comprehensive planning framework [7,8,9,10]. Unlike conventional redevelopment approaches that emphasize housing or commercial functions, this model positions cultural and educational infrastructures as drivers of urban identity and competitiveness. Second, the study critically examines the transferability of lessons from global precedents to the Korean context, identifying opportunities and limitations in applying international experiences to Daegu [7,13]. These objectives underscore the dual contribution of the research: expanding academic discourse on sustainable post-military regeneration and providing a masterplanning vision that aligns with Daegu’s global aspirations [10,13].

1.2. Design Scope and Methods

The scope of this study is defined across spatial, temporal, and thematic dimensions. Spatially, it focuses on the former K-2 Airbase in Daegu, covering approximately 7 km2 adjacent to the city center [10]. This scale enables the integration of diverse urban functions, from residential and industrial uses to cultural, ecological, and educational facilities [14]. Temporally, the study adopts a long-term perspective, addressing immediate redevelopment challenges such as remediation and infrastructure, while envisioning sustainable management, resilience, and urban identity for future decades [11]. Thematically, it emphasizes four interlinked axes: cultural exchange, creative industries, education, and tourism, all supported by ecological restoration and low-carbon infrastructure [9,12,15,16,17].
Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative framework integrating three approaches. First, a theoretical review situates the study within discourses on brownfield regeneration, cultural cities, and post-military site redevelopment [1,2,3,4]. Second, a comparative case analysis investigates international precedents—Munich-Riem, Tempelhof, Toronto, and Stapleton—to derive lessons that can be transferred to the Korean context [1,2,3]. Third, a design-oriented exploration translates these conceptual insights into masterplanning strategies for the K-2 site [10]. Although primarily conceptual, the research also acknowledges the importance of future empirical validation through GIS-based simulations, environmental performance assessments, and stakeholder engagement [12]. By combining these methods, the study aims to contribute to academic debates on sustainable city-making while offering practical guidance for policymakers and urban designers addressing large-scale military site redevelopment.
While the study is primarily conceptual and design-oriented, indicative parameters were also considered to reinforce methodological rigor. In particular, basic metrics such as accessibility from the site to major urban nodes, the baseline and target ratio of green coverage, and a preliminary balance between projected residents and employment opportunities were qualitatively reviewed. These elements, though not fully quantified, provided a reference frame for structuring the Global Contents City masterplan. The study also acknowledges the need for further empirical research, including GIS-based simulations, environmental performance assessments, and structured stakeholder engagement, to validate and operationalize the proposed strategies in future work [12].

2. Theoretical Review

2.1. Definition of Key Terms

In order to engage in a substantive discussion of the redevelopment of the former K-2 site, it is first necessary to establish clear definitions of the core concepts. This study primarily addresses the notions of Brownfield, Master Plan, and Sustainable Urban Development.
Brownfield refers to land that has become idle following the loss of military or industrial functions. In the Korean context, this typically includes sites vacated by military airbases, barracks, factories, or shipyards that have either been relocated or ceased operation. Such areas are often characterized by complex challenges such as soil and water contamination, deterioration of infrastructure, and physical or social disconnection from surrounding districts. They also present the opportunity to secure large-scale developable land within the urban fabric, thereby carrying significant potential as new engines of growth and as catalysts for urban restructuring [2,3].
A Master Plan refers to a higher-order plan that establishes medium- to long-term development directions for a specific area, comprehensively presenting spatial structures, functional allocations, and operational strategies. In the urban context, master planning extends beyond the physical arrangement of space to include considerations of socio-economic impacts, environmental sustainability, and cultural identity. Accordingly, master plans for brownfield redevelopment not only restructure the physical fabric of the city but also aim to generate economic vitality, create socio-cultural value, and achieve environmental restoration and sustainability [4,11].
Sustainable Urban Development is rooted in the principle defined by the 1987 Brundtland Report: development that “meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Amid contemporary challenges such as the climate crisis, low growth, demographic aging, and digital transformation, the concept has gained even greater importance. Large-scale urban transformation projects, including brownfield redevelopment, must therefore simultaneously pursue economic growth, environmental preservation, and social inclusiveness. Achieving this requires the principle of sustainability to be systematically embedded throughout the development process [8,12].

2.2. Related Precedent Studies

The redevelopment of large-scale idle military and industrial sites has been the subject of extensive international scholarship and practical experimentation. Precedents such as Munich-Riem (Germany), Tempelhof (Berlin), Toronto (Canada), and Stapleton (Denver) have frequently been cited as models of transformation, each illustrating different governance mechanisms, sustainability strategies, and socio-cultural outcomes [1,2,3,4]. These cases provide comparative insights into how large brownfield and airport sites can be repurposed into mixed-use cultural and ecological districts.
To strengthen methodological rigor, this study applies clear criteria in selecting and analyzing precedents. The chosen cases were selected for their comparability with the Daegu K-2 site in terms of scale, conversion context (e.g., military airbases, airports, industrial brownfields), and the degree to which cultural and ecological strategies were integrated into the redevelopment process [14]. The comparative analysis is structured around key variables: land use transformation, governance and finance, socio-cultural outcomes, and sustainability lessons. Importantly, each precedent is connected to the Daegu K-2 Global Contents City framework through a lesson-to-design choice mapping, ensuring that international experiences inform, but do not override, the Korean planning context [7].
Beyond Western precedents, it is equally important to examine experiences from East Asia, where cultural, demographic, and governance contexts more closely align with the Korean situation. Projects such as the Yongsan Garrison conversion in Seoul, the Shinjuku redevelopment in Tokyo, and the West Bund transformation in Shanghai demonstrate how Asian cities have embedded cultural industries, hybrid governance structures, and creative economies into large-scale regeneration [5,6,8,18]. These cases highlight the importance of linking cultural identity and economic competitiveness with ecological and social sustainability, offering regionally relevant insights for Daegu.
Table 1 synthesizes these comparative precedents and their relevance to the K-2 Global Contents City. By presenting both Western and Asian cases, it illustrates how ecological restoration, cultural clustering, governance continuity, financial innovation, and public participation can be adapted to Daegu’s context. This comparative framework ensures that the K-2 proposal is grounded in internationally validated practices while advancing a Korea-specific regeneration model that emphasizes cultural industries as a distinctive driver of competitiveness.

3. Urban Design Strategies

3.1. Vision of the Global Contents City

The redevelopment of the former K-2 site aims to realize a “Global Contents City,” a vision that transcends conventional approaches to reusing idle military land. Rather than emphasizing single-function redevelopment, this model integrates cultural exchange, education, content industries, and sustainability into a comprehensive urban framework [4,14]. In this sense, the Global Contents City is conceived as an ecosystem where cultural creation and exchange, learning and research, and industrial dissemination are organically interconnected [10,15].
In contemporary urban development, cultural industries have become a major driver of growth and a central component of the global economy [9,16]. Within this context, K-Culture—including music, film, drama, games, and design—has achieved worldwide recognition, reinforcing Korea’s national brand and enhancing urban competitiveness. The K-2 site, with its substantial scale and spatial connectivity, offers an unprecedented opportunity to integrate these functions and position Daegu within global cultural networks [17].
The vision is articulated through four interdependent pillars. Cultural exchange expands international networks and strengthens global identity; education nurtures creative talent and provides intellectual foundations for cultural and industrial growth; content industries generate economic resources and global visibility; and sustainability underpins ecological resilience, social inclusiveness, and governance balance across districts [7,12,15]. These pillars are mutually reinforcing: cultural exchange stimulates demand for new creative outputs, education supplies the necessary talent and research capacity, and content industries create financial stability and visibility, while sustainability ensures that these interactions remain viable in the long term [9,10,15,16,19].
Potential constraints are also acknowledged. Large-scale cultural events may create ecological pressures if not supported by adequate green and open space planning; rapid industrial growth risks exacerbating inequality unless aligned with inclusive education and public accessibility; and educational infrastructures may be constrained by commercial imperatives if cultural programming is not balanced. Addressing these challenges through sustainability-oriented design and governance ensures that the four pillars operate synergistically rather than in conflict [4,12].
Ultimately, this integrated vision enhances Daegu’s long-term competitiveness and brand value. By situating cultural exchange, education, and content industries within a sustainability framework, the Global Contents City establishes a distinctive identity that aligns local resources with global cultural flows, positioning Daegu not only as a significant national redevelopment case but also as an internationally recognized cultural hub [9,13,15].

3.2. Establishing a Global Cultural Exchange Hub

The Global Cultural Exchange Hub is proposed as a site-specific anchor for the redevelopment of the Daegu K-2 Airbase, rather than a general model already in operation elsewhere. Conceived as the symbolic and functional core of the Global Contents City, the hub is designed to host international exhibitions, conventions, cultural festivals, and K-Culture performances [10,15]. By concentrating programs of global exchange within a single, identifiable district, the hub provides both a symbolic gateway and a practical platform for positioning Daegu as a node in international cultural and economic networks [9,16].
Physically, the hub integrates large-scale convention and exhibition facilities with performance halls, museums, and cultural plazas, complemented by public open spaces that accommodate multicultural events and everyday civic life [13,17]. Programmatically, it is envisioned as a space where global and local cultural flows intersect: international visitors encounter K-Culture productions, while local communities engage with diverse global cultural expressions. This dual role enhances Daegu’s cultural identity while supporting tourism, creative industries, and education [20].
As such, the Global Cultural Exchange Hub is not a generic idea but a context-specific design proposal tailored to the unique opportunities and challenges of the K-2 site. Its function within the overall masterplan is to anchor the spatial framework of the Global Contents City, ensuring that cultural exchange becomes a driver of sustainable regeneration and a catalyst for Daegu’s future competitiveness [7,14].

3.3. Fostering Global Cultural Education

Realizing the vision of the Global Contents City requires an educational foundation that can support the diffusion of K-Culture [15]. The growth of the cultural industry depends on creative talent and the learning and research infrastructure that sustains it, while education serves a strategic role that extends beyond the transfer of knowledge to the diffusion of creativity throughout the city [10]. By establishing an internationally competitive educational environment, the former K-2 site must evolve into a global learning ecosystem that is closely linked to cultural industries.
The first step involves creating an International Education Center, functioning as a multilayered platform where learners from diverse cultural backgrounds can engage in collaborative research and exchange, with K-Culture included as a central subject of study. Complementing this, a Creative Talent Development Cluster—integrating universities, research institutions, enterprises, and creative studios—would support the production of K-Culture-based content and establish a virtuous cycle in which academic outcomes are translated into industrial achievements. Within this structure, individuals move beyond the role of consumers to become creators of new cultural value.
An industry–academia–research campus would tightly connect education with industrial practice, ensuring that research results feed directly into cultural industries while industrial demands, in turn, guide the direction of education and research. This alignment situates K-Culture-related sectors within global cultural industry flows and positions them as key drivers of urban growth [16]. Moreover, its open structure would guarantee that the benefits of education extend beyond privileged groups to the wider public. Digital transformation—including online learning platforms and metaverse-based campuses—would enable real-time collaboration among learners worldwide, thereby innovating both the scope and methods of cultural education.
Ultimately, the International Education Center, the Creative Talent Development Cluster, the industry–academia–research campus, and digital learning platforms function as an integrated strategy that transforms the K-2 site into a hub of global learning. Through this, the city can simultaneously lead in cultivating creative talent and advancing K-Culture industries, establishing itself as an international model of an education- and culture-oriented urban system [19].

3.4. Building a Sustainable Cultural Ecosystem

The realization of the Global Contents City vision requires the establishment of a sustainable cultural ecosystem, structured across three dimensions—environmental, social, and economic sustainability—that collectively support cultural exchange and education. [11]. Although the cultural industry is grounded in creativity and innovation, it cannot function as a lasting driver of urban development if it relies solely on short-term outcomes [4]. Thus, the central challenge lies in creating conditions under which cultural activities can be maintained in the long term within a framework that integrates environmental, social, and economic sustainability.
Environmental sustainability is achieved through soil remediation, eco-park development, energy-efficient urban planning, and eco-friendly architectural practices. Low-carbon transportation systems, renewable energy utilization, and smart infrastructure enable the long-term operation of the cultural city. Green spaces and public areas provide the everyday foundation for cultural activities and civic interaction [12]. These measures are conceived as prerequisites for redevelopment, ensuring that ecological risks are addressed before programmatic activation.
Social sustainability requires that cultural activities not be confined to specific groups but instead expand inclusively to encompass the entire local population as well as global users. Shared spaces that foster a cyclical structure of creation and consumption encourage participation not only from citizens but also from international visitors, students, and creators [9]. Thus, individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds can actively engage as producers within cultural industries, including K-Culture, thereby strengthening social cohesion and cross-cultural dialog.
Economic sustainability is addressed not only in terms of project financing but also in relation to long-term contributions to the local economy. The Global Contents City is expected to generate substantial employment opportunities through cultural industries, education clusters, and service sectors, thereby reinforcing Daegu’s role within the national innovation network [10,15,21]. By diversifying the city’s industrial base with cultural, technological, and healthcare components, the redevelopment mitigates the risks of economic monoculture while enhancing regional resilience [20,22]. These dynamics also provide a foundation for fiscal growth, as cultural tourism and creative industry flows expand the local tax base [13,17]. Together, these economic, social, and environmental strategies form a mutually reinforcing system that secures the viability of the Global Contents City as a sustainable cultural ecosystem.
In sum, the construction of a sustainable cultural ecosystem is possible only through strategies that integrate environmental responsibility, social inclusiveness, and economic stability. By fulfilling these conditions, the Global Contents City at the K-2 site can transform K-Culture from short-lived achievements into a sustainable resource transmitted across generations and borders.

4. Design Strategies for the Global Contents City

4.1. Zoning

The zoning framework of the Global Contents City is conceived as a strategic mechanism for spatializing the project’s core vision, namely the integration of international exchange, education, industry, and tourism. At the center, the International Exchange Hub is positioned as a symbolic axis that concentrates global cultural activities and international events, thereby anchoring the overall urban structure [9,10,15,16]. To the north, the Technology Zone is linked with Sinseo Innovation City and hosts clusters in advanced industry and healthcare, serving as a growth driver connected to global knowledge industries [7,14]. To the east, the Creative Zone is designed as a knowledge and creative cluster in collaboration with nearby universities, supporting both the cultivation of global talent and the production of cultural contents [15,16]. The Tourist Zone to the south integrates Daegu’s cultural and tourism resources, accommodating experiential culture and international tourism; within this context, performances, exhibitions, and experiential programs related to K-Culture are incorporated to strengthen the city’s global brand [13,17]. To the west, the Urban Logistics Zone is directly connected to the highway interchange and metropolitan transport networks, providing the physical foundation for industrial activity and international exchange (Figure 1) [11].
This four-directional zoning structure interlinks the central hub with specialized districts, forming an integrated urban ecosystem in which international cultural exchange, creative education, industrial innovation, and tourism are mutually reinforcing. Within this framework, the cultural and tourism sectors combine local resources with K-Culture to generate a distinctive urban identity, while the education and research sectors embed these resources within processes of creation and learning to enhance long-term sustainability. Rather than being confined to any single function, K-Culture is interwoven across exchange, education, industry, and tourism, thereby establishing a foundation for the city’s sustained expansion within global cultural networks [12,19].
In this regard, this zoning strategy reflects the principles of polycentric urbanism, balancing specialized functions across districts while fostering systemic resilience in socio-economic and environmental dimensions [15,16].

4.2. Urban Road Network

The road network of the Global Contents City is planned as a core infrastructure that organically integrates international exchange, education, industry, and tourism, functioning as a critical device for materializing the city’s vision in spatial terms [4]. Radiating from the central International Exchange Hub, the primary arterial roads extend northward to the Technology Zone, eastward to the Creative Zone, southward to the Tourist Zone, and westward to the Urban Logistics Zone, ensuring that each functional axis directly connects to the city’s core values [7]. In particular, the western transport corridor is strategically linked to the Palgong Interchange, which connects directly to the regional expressway system. This enhances metropolitan accessibility and provides a robust foundation not only for logistics but also for accommodating large-scale international events and tourism flows [10,15]. Accordingly, arterial roads function not merely as transport routes but as conduits for the international diffusion of industry, education, culture, tourism, and logistics (Figure 2).
Secondary arterial roads complement these primary corridors by facilitating inter-district interaction and enabling the cyclical diffusion of exchange, learning, creation, and consumption across the city. This structure ensures that cultural and industrial activities are not confined to isolated districts but are disseminated citywide, with educational, research, and industrial functions intersecting to reinforce overall urban vitality.
Collector roads connect neighborhood-scale living zones and are integrated with pedestrian and bicycle networks, providing a foundation for the coexistence of international events and everyday activities. Such a configuration creates conditions under which festivals and large-scale events coexist with daily cultural experiences, allowing both residents and visitors to engage in cultural exchange as part of ordinary urban life.
Taken together, the road network of the Global Contents City opens up multilayered arenas for international cultural exchange and continuously activates an urban ecosystem in which education, industry, and tourism operate synergistically. Furthermore, when combined with digital communication infrastructures, the physical road system evolves beyond a mechanism of movement to become a strategic foundation for the global diffusion of culture and industry. Within this process, K-Culture operates as a catalytic element that links local resources with global cultural flows, reinforcing the city’s international identity [9,16].
In addition, the road system incorporates a hierarchical street typology, ranging from arterial to local roads, which ensures functional differentiation and accessibility at multiple scales. Arterial roads provide metropolitan connectivity and support large-scale flows, while collector and local roads prioritize pedestrian comfort and neighborhood-level mobility. This hierarchy not only enhances circulation efficiency but also aligns with sustainability goals by promoting walkability and multimodal integration within the overall transport framework.
Accordingly, beyond physical connectivity, the road system embodies the concept of sustainable mobility, enabling the diffusion of cultural, industrial, and educational functions while minimizing ecological impact [11,19].

4.3. District Unit Plan

The District Unit Plan of the Global Contents City is structured in a radial configuration, with the central Cultural Exchange District serving as the focal point and specialized functions distributed to the north, east, south, and west. The Cultural Exchange District accommodates international exhibitions, performances, and events, acting as a symbolic hub that connects to global networks and provides a stage for diverse cultural contents, including K-Culture, to engage in international exchange [13,17].
The northern Technology and Healthcare District is linked to the Sinseo Innovation City, driving the growth of advanced industries and the bio-medical sector. By integrating digital technologies with cultural content, this district expands the potential for next-generation industrial development [14]. To the east, the Creative and Educational Research District establishes a knowledge and creativity cluster connected to local universities, forming a global learning ecosystem through international education centers and creative talent cultivation hubs [15,19].
The southern Cultural, Experiential, and Tourism District connects Daegu’s cultural resources with broader tourism networks, providing a concentrated venue for performances and festivals. Here, K-Culture is integrated with local cultural assets, establishing a foundation for absorbing international tourism demand [9]. Meanwhile, the western Transportation and Logistics District is directly connected to metropolitan transportation systems, supporting the physical infrastructure necessary for global exchange and industrial activity, while also facilitating the international distribution of cultural industry-related content and products (Figure 3) [11].
Collectively, this plan establishes an integrated structure in which each specialized district is organically connected around the Cultural Exchange District, creating an urban ecosystem where exchange, education, industry, and tourism operate in a mutually reinforcing manner. Within this process, K-Culture functions as a catalyst—particularly in the central and southern districts—by combining with other functions to enable the city’s sustained expansion within global cultural networks [12,16].
Thus, by integrating cultural, technological, educational, and tourism functions, this district structure aligns with the sustainable city paradigm, ensuring that diverse urban activities reinforce one another in a resilient ecosystem [9,10,19].

4.4. Green Open Space

The green and open space framework of the Global Contents City is conceived as the ecological foundation that integrates international exchange, education, industry, and tourism. At the core, a central plaza is designed to accommodate international events and multicultural festivals, serving as both a symbolic and functional space for global interaction [12]. On the eastern side, campus-style green areas are introduced to support learning and creative activities, fostering an environment conducive to knowledge production and cultural innovation [10,15].
In the southern district, experiential parks and outdoor performance venues are strategically located to connect with tourism resources, thereby enhancing cultural consumption and visitor engagement. On the western edge, buffer green zones are established to mediate between logistics functions and residential environments, ensuring a balance between economic activity and quality of life (Figure 4) [4].
Collectively, these spatial strategies generate a sustainable urban environment where international exchange intersects with everyday activities. By integrating green and open spaces into the city’s cultural and functional fabric, the plan not only supports ecological resilience but also reinforces the inclusivity and livability essential to a globally connected cultural city [16,19]. These strategies directly advance environmental sustainability by expanding ecological coverage from baseline conditions, incorporating soil and groundwater remediation, and embedding low-carbon infrastructure as measurable indicators of ecological resilience [12]. Building upon this ecological foundation, the open space strategy also incorporates brownfield remediation measures, thereby ensuring that environmental risks are addressed as a prerequisite for redevelopment.
Accordingly, the green and open space framework exemplifies the application of ecosystem service theory, ensuring that cultural and economic activities are grounded in ecological resilience and long-term sustainability [12]. Building upon this ecological foundation, the open space strategy also incorporates brownfield remediation measures, including soil restoration, groundwater treatment, and low-carbon ecological infrastructure, thereby ensuring that environmental risks are addressed as a prerequisite for redevelopment [3,11].

4.5. Land Use

The land use strategy of the Global Contents City is designed to realize a complex urban ecosystem in which international exchange, cultural industries, education and research, tourism, and logistics are organically interconnected. At the core, a Cultural Exchange Hub and a Cultural MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conventions, and Exhibitions) district are located to host international exhibitions, conferences, and festivals, thereby functioning as symbolic anchors that articulate the identity of the city [9,17]. This central area also serves as a space that accommodates a wide spectrum of global cultural contents—including K-Culture—providing a multi-layered platform where international events coexist with local cultural activities [13].
Surrounding this hub, a cluster of cultural industry complexes, cultural R&D centers, K-Content theme parks, and cultural experience districts are strategically integrated to form a cyclical structure of production, experimentation, exhibition, and consumption [9]. This configuration not only encompasses K-Culture’s creation, experience, and consumption but also aspires to foster a balanced ecosystem that accommodates the growth of diverse cultural industries [14].
The northern district is structured around technology R&D, technovalley functions, and medical–healthcare clusters, in connection with the Sinseo Innovation City, thereby establishing an advanced industrial cluster that enables global technology exchange and the development of bio–healthcare industries [14]. Within this process, digital technology and the media industry are naturally aligned with the global dissemination of K-Culture content. The eastern district concentrates global campuses, creative clusters, creative support facilities, and media studios to form an international hub where education, research, and creative production converge. This area supports cultural and artistic education programs—including K-Culture—as well as collaborative research initiatives, fostering creative talent and enabling global partnerships [15,19].
The southern district incorporates a cultural street, sports centers, and cultural administration facilities, providing inclusive public cultural experience spaces for both citizens and visitors, while reinforcing Daegu’s urban brand through direct linkage with the city’s tourism resources. This zone has strong potential to evolve into a destination where K-Culture performances and experiential programs are closely integrated with tourism initiatives. The western district is anchored by transportation hubs, logistics centers, and financial complexes, which consolidate regional transportation and commercial–logistics functions, strengthening the networks of global business and distribution. These infrastructures further promote the international circulation of cultural contents and products, including K-Culture (Figure 5).
Taken together, this land use structure spatializes the core values of the Global Contents City—cultural exchange, creative education, industrial innovation, tourism activation, and logistics integration—into a balanced urban framework. In this process, K-Culture does not remain confined to a single functional area but acts as a catalyst that interlinks various districts, thereby amplifying the city’s cultural attractiveness and positioning it within global networks.
Consequently, the land use strategy embodies the logic of circular urbanism, interlinking cultural creation, education, industry, and tourism in a cyclical system of production and consumption [16,19].
To secure implementability, the framework anticipates a governance structure combining national–local leadership with PPP arrangements. Land-value capture mechanisms and cultural industry investment funds are proposed as financing tools to support long-term sustainability. The project’s viability relies not only on institutional leadership but also on the active involvement of diverse stakeholders. Residents, local communities, and businesses are to be engaged through participatory planning workshops, community consultations, and business forums, ensuring that decisions reflect multiple perspectives. Embedding transparent communication mechanisms helps build trust, mitigate conflict, and align stakeholder expectations, thereby reinforcing both the legitimacy and resilience of the redevelopment process.

4.6. Facility Layout Plan

The facility layout plan emphasizes an integrated spatial organization rather than isolated clusters, fostering synergies consistent with principles of adaptive and sustainable urban design [9,10]. The arrangement establishes functional linkages across cultural, educational, industrial, and residential districts, ensuring balanced interactions within the Global Contents City.
To secure feasibility, development is structured in three phases. Phase 1 delivers an eco-park and foundational infrastructure, prioritizing site remediation, soil restoration, and green corridors to expand ecological coverage. Phase 2 activates cultural and educational facilities, with programmatic hubs that strengthen accessibility to Daegu’s urban core, the new airport, and surrounding industrial and educational clusters within 20–30 min. Phase 3 consolidates residential–industrial clusters with the aim of achieving a balanced jobs–housing structure. This phase emphasizes the integration of cultural industries, education, and service-sector employment to reinforce everyday livability and urban vitality (Figure 6).
This phased strategy provides a structured pathway for implementation, aligning program activation with infrastructural readiness and demand triggers. It also enhances resilience by sequencing ecological restoration, cultural activation, and socio-economic consolidation in a cumulative process of urban transformation.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

The findings of this study indicate that the redevelopment of large-scale idle military sites should not be treated merely as physical land reuse but rather as the creation of integrated urban ecosystems. The Global Contents City framework interlinks cultural, educational, industrial, and ecological functions, demonstrating how post-military land can be repositioned as a driver of regional competitiveness and global connectivity. This aligns with international precedents such as Munich-Riem and Stapleton, where ecological restoration and mixed-use communities were prioritized, yet it confirms a distinct trajectory in the Korean context by positioning cultural content industries as a central pillar of regeneration.
The comparative analysis further shows that while some international cases emphasize ecological remediation (Toronto) or civic participation (Tempelhof), the Daegu K-2 project foregrounds cultural exchange and global branding. Related experiences in East Asian cities—as discussed in Section 3—highlight that regeneration lessons must be contextually adapted rather than replicated wholesale. This confirms that the Global Contents City contributes both as a planning vision and as a cultural strategy, reinforcing sustainable urbanism and positioning Daegu within global cultural flows.
This vision is substantiated through the Master Plan of the Sustainable Global Contents City (Figure 7), which illustrates the integration of cultural, educational, industrial, and ecological zones in a comprehensive satellite-view layout. In addition, the bird’s-eye perspective (Figure 8) visualizes the proposed urban environment at the human scale, demonstrating how the conceptual framework translates into tangible urban form that emphasizes connectivity, inclusivity, and ecological resilience.
The phased development strategy further anchors the vision to measurable milestones. Phase 1 delivers an eco-park and essential infrastructure, raising ecological coverage from the current 12% baseline to at least 20% and ensuring site readiness through remediation and green corridors. Phase 2 activates cultural and educational facilities, improving accessibility by enabling 20–30 min connections to Daegu’s urban core, the new airport, and regional clusters. Phase 3 consolidates residential–industrial clusters, aiming to approximate a balanced jobs–housing ratio supported by employment in cultural industries, education, and service sectors. Collectively, these phases provide a cumulative pathway toward competitiveness and resilience.
The analysis confirms that successful implementation cannot rely solely on physical planning and financing mechanisms. Active participation by local communities, residents, and businesses is essential. Embedding communication platforms—such as participatory workshops, community consultations, and business forums—ensures balanced interests, mitigates conflict, and enhances legitimacy. Stakeholder engagement therefore functions not only as a governance mechanism but also as a social sustainability strategy, reinforcing inclusiveness and long-term ownership of the redevelopment process.
In conclusion, this research proposes the Global Contents City as a sustainable urban regeneration model for the redevelopment of the Daegu K-2 military airbase. By situating the case within international discourse, it confirms that large-scale idle military land can be transformed into a strategic urban asset that integrates cultural, industrial, educational, and ecological dimensions. The study contributes to scholarly debates by demonstrating cultural industries as a distinctive driver of regeneration in the East Asian context.
The framework also anchors its vision to sustainability targets across three dimensions. Environmentally, it prioritizes ecological restoration through soil remediation, groundwater treatment, and the expansion of green coverage from a 12% baseline to at least 20%. Socially, it emphasizes inclusiveness by embedding educational hubs, international exchange facilities, civic cultural spaces, and stakeholder participation platforms that foster broad engagement and strengthen community identity. Economically, it underscores long-term competitiveness through job creation, industrial diversification, and innovative financing. Beyond immediate employment and service activation, fiscal growth is projected through expanded tax bases derived from cultural tourism, creative industries, and knowledge-intensive sectors. To secure financial sustainability, mechanisms such as land-value capture, cultural industry investment funds, and PPP-based governance are proposed. These frameworks are envisioned to function through diversified funding sources, transparent profit-sharing, and distributed risk-management strategies, ensuring resilient and reinvestable revenue streams.
Nevertheless, this study remains conceptual in nature. While the framework draws on international precedents and indicative parameters to support feasibility, it does not yet incorporate field-based research such as questionnaires, interviews, or direct observation. Future research should therefore provide empirical validation through accessibility modeling, environmental performance assessments, socio-economic impact studies, and participatory workshops. In addition, potential obstacles such as financial constraints, political resistance, and technical challenges are acknowledged as critical issues that require deeper empirical investigation to provide practical guidance for implementation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and E.K.; methodology, E.K.; software, E.K.; formal analysis, E.K.; data curation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, J.L. and E.K.; visualization, J.L. and E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adams, D.; De Sousa, C.; Tiesdell, S. Brownfield development: A comparison of North American and British approaches. Urban Stud. 2010, 47, 75–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Longo, A.; Campbell, D. The Determinants of Brownfields Redevelopment in England. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2016, 67, 261–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Sousa, C.A. Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: An examination of past trends and future prospects. Land Use Policy 2002, 19, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Couch, C.; Sykes, O.; Börstinghaus, W. Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Prog. Plan. 2011, 75, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, H. A Study on the Characteristics of New Towns and the Redevelopment of Project-Canceled Areas: A Case Study of Seoul, South Korea. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shin, H.B.; Kim, S.H. The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul. Urban Stud. 2016, 53, 540–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lee, H.; Baek, H. Masterplan for the former K-2 site in Daegu: Focusing on the winning project of the international idea competition. J. Urban Des. Inst. Korea 2022, 23, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sorensen, A.; Okata, J. Megacities: Urban Form, Governance, and Sustainability; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Evans, G. Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Stud. 2005, 42, 959–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Evans, G. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Stud. 2009, 46, 1003–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Otsuka, N.; Dixon, T.; Abe, H. Stock measurement and regeneration policy approaches to brownfield redevelopment in England and Japan. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Isola, F.; Lai, S.; Leone, F.; Zoppi, C. Urban Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Service Supply: A Study Concerning the Functional Urban Area of Cagliari, Italy. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Plaza, B. Evaluating the influence of a large cultural artifact in the attraction of tourism: The Guggenheim Museum Bilbao case. Urban Aff. Rev. 2000, 36, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baek, H.; Kim, H. A Study on the Key Factors of the Informal Plan for the Utilization of the Former Military Airport Area: Focused on the Cases of German Military Airport Development. J. Korea Urban Regener. 2023, 9, 135–153. [Google Scholar]
  15. Florida, R. Cities and the creative class. City Community 2003, 2, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cerisola, S.; Panzera, E. Cultural cities, urban economic growth, and regional development: The role of creativity and cosmopolitan identity. Pap. Reg. Sci. 2022, 101, 285–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gonzalez, S. Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’. How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Stud. 2011, 48, 1397–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, F. Planning for Growth: Urban and Regional Planning in China; Routledge: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hospers, G. Creative cities: Breeding places in the knowledge economy. Knowl. Technol. Policy 2003, 16, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hodge, G.; Greve, C. Public–Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review. Public Adm. Rev. 2007, 67, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kong, L. From Cultural Industries to Creative Industries and Back? Towards Clarifying Theory and Rethinking Policy. Inter-Asia Cult. Stud. 2014, 15, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suzuki, H.; Murakami, J.; Hong, Y.H.; Tamayose, B. Financing Transit-Oriented Development with Land Values: Adapting Land Value Capture in Developing Countries; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The zoning framework of the Global Contents City.
Figure 1. The zoning framework of the Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g001
Figure 2. The road network of the Global Contents City.
Figure 2. The road network of the Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g002
Figure 3. The District Unit Plan of the Global Contents City.
Figure 3. The District Unit Plan of the Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g003
Figure 4. The green and open space framework of the Global Contents City.
Figure 4. The green and open space framework of the Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g004
Figure 5. The land use strategy of the Global Contents City.
Figure 5. The land use strategy of the Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g005
Figure 6. The facility layout of the Global Contents City.
Figure 6. The facility layout of the Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g006
Figure 7. Master Plan of the Sustainable Global Contents City.
Figure 7. Master Plan of the Sustainable Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g007
Figure 8. Perspective of the Sustainable Global Contents City.
Figure 8. Perspective of the Sustainable Global Contents City.
Sustainability 17 08989 g008
Table 1. Comparative analysis of international and domestic redevelopment precedents of former airports and military sites, with lessons applicable to the Daegu K-2 project.
Table 1. Comparative analysis of international and domestic redevelopment precedents of former airports and military sites, with lessons applicable to the Daegu K-2 project.
Precedent CaseLand Use TransformationGovernance and PolicyKey LessonsSustainability LessonsApplication to Daegu K-2 Global Contents City
Munich-Riem (Germany)—Former Airport SiteMilitary/civil airport → mixed-use eco-district (housing, fairground, park)Comprehensive masterplan; long-term ecological targetsLong-term ecological targets; integration of housing, commerce, and open space [4,14]Emphasizes ecological restoration and long-term managementEstablishment of eco-park and green corridors connecting cultural and industrial zones
Tempelhof (Berlin, Germany)—Military AirportAirport closure → open cultural park and civic spaceCitizen referendum blocked housing plan; strong community roleImportance of civic participation; legitimacy through flexible planning [4]Highlights importance of community participation and flexible planningDevelopment of cultural exchange hub and civic plaza to enhance identity and inclusiveness
Toronto (Canada)—Brownfield RedevelopmentIndustrial brownfield → mixed residential and commercial redevelopmentMunicipal planning with environmental remediation policiesEnvironmental remediation as prerequisite; governance innovation [3,11]Stress on environmental remediation as prerequisite for redevelopmentIncorporation of remediation strategy; adoption of PPP-based governance and finance model
Stapleton (Denver, USA)—Former AirportAirport site → sustainable new town with housing, parks, and retailPublic–private foundation (Stapleton Development Corp.)Governance continuity; phased growth; jobs–housing balance [1,2]Illustrates long-term governance and financial sustainabilityApplication of mixed-use zoning; phased development strategy with governance continuity
Seoul (Korea)—Yongsan Garrison ConversionMilitary base → national park and cultural assetsStrong national–local coordinationCultural–ecological integration [5]Ecological restoration and public accessibilityAdaptation of governance lessons for K-2, ensuring integration of cultural and ecological functions
Tokyo (Japan)—Shinjuku RedevelopmentHigh-density urban district → integrated cultural–commercial hubMetropolitan-led planning with private sectorCultural industries embedded in infrastructure [8]Economic vibrancy with cultural clusteringApplication of cultural industry complexes and hybrid MICE infrastructure
Shanghai (China)—West Bund RedevelopmentIndustrial waterfront → cultural cluster and creative industriesMunicipal-led with cultural investment fundsGlobal branding through cultural hubs [18]Leveraging cultural industries for competitivenessEstablishment of cultural clusters and creative industry funds to reinforce Daegu’s global connectivity
Daegu K-2 (Korea)—Former Military Airbase (proposed)Idle military site → Global Contents City (culture, education, industry, tourism)National–local collaboration required; governance model still formingTo be determined: potential PPP, cultural industry investmentPotential to integrate creative city strategies with sustainability frameworksEco-park and corridors; cultural hub; remediation and PPP; phased governance; K-Culture pillar.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Kim, E. A Study on the Master Planning of the Sustainable Global Contents City for the Redevelopment of Daegu K-2. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208989

AMA Style

Lee J, Kim E. A Study on the Master Planning of the Sustainable Global Contents City for the Redevelopment of Daegu K-2. Sustainability. 2025; 17(20):8989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jieun, and Eunkwang Kim. 2025. "A Study on the Master Planning of the Sustainable Global Contents City for the Redevelopment of Daegu K-2" Sustainability 17, no. 20: 8989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208989

APA Style

Lee, J., & Kim, E. (2025). A Study on the Master Planning of the Sustainable Global Contents City for the Redevelopment of Daegu K-2. Sustainability, 17(20), 8989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17208989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop