Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of PM2.5- and O3-Attributable Impacts in China: Changing Trends and Driving Factors
Previous Article in Journal
A Three-Stage Stochastic–Robust Scheduling for Oxy-Fuel Combustion Capture Involved Virtual Power Plants Considering Source–Load Uncertainties and Carbon Trading
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Quantitative Study on the Synergistic Effect of China’s Plastic Restriction Policy from 2008 to 2025

1
School of Marxism, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214126, China
2
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214126, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7355; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167355
Submission received: 12 July 2025 / Revised: 10 August 2025 / Accepted: 13 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025

Abstract

Since 2008, the Chinese government has been intensively implementing policies to control plastic pollution. This study employs text mining and scientific statistical methods to quantitatively analyze 223 policy documents spanning the period from 2008 to 2025. The novelty of this study is associated with the analysis of temporal coherence, content complementarity and subject collaboration in the field of policy aimed at limiting the use of plastic and the development of a universal methodology for the design of complex environmental policies. The results show that policy releases peaked in 2008 and 2020. The average number of policies issued by each province in the eastern region is the highest, with 6.8 items. In terms of policy content, A3, B3, and C3 are the most prominent policy objectives, means and safeguard measures, respectively. The synergy of policy content indicates that market-oriented policies have stronger implementation, for example, the synergy strength between A2 and B2 is 0.7467. The synergy between legislative and enforcement policies is insufficient. For example, the synergy strength between A1 and B1 is only 0.2903. The regional synergy decreases from southwest to northeast. The northeast region lags comprehensively. In terms of time, the similarity of policy texts between 2021 and 2023 remained stable (0.3256–0.3666). The three-dimensional framework offers an approach to policy synergy evaluation. It indicates that the core governance framework of the Chinese Government has strong continuity. This study also has positive value for global environmental protection, such as reducing plastic pollution.
Keywords: plastic restriction policy; policy synergy; text mining; quantitative research plastic restriction policy; policy synergy; text mining; quantitative research

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L. Quantitative Study on the Synergistic Effect of China’s Plastic Restriction Policy from 2008 to 2025. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167355

AMA Style

Zhang L, Wang Y, Xu Z, Chen L. Quantitative Study on the Synergistic Effect of China’s Plastic Restriction Policy from 2008 to 2025. Sustainability. 2025; 17(16):7355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Li, Yiyao Wang, Ziyou Xu, and Liangkun Chen. 2025. "Quantitative Study on the Synergistic Effect of China’s Plastic Restriction Policy from 2008 to 2025" Sustainability 17, no. 16: 7355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167355

APA Style

Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Xu, Z., & Chen, L. (2025). Quantitative Study on the Synergistic Effect of China’s Plastic Restriction Policy from 2008 to 2025. Sustainability, 17(16), 7355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop