Next Article in Journal
Applicable and Flexible Post-Disaster Housing Through Parametric Design and 3D Printing: A Novel Model for Prototyping and Deployment
Previous Article in Journal
Unraveling the Microbiome–Environmental Change Nexus to Contribute to a More Sustainable World: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecological Innovations Supporting Sustainable Development: The Case of the Polish Tire Industry

by
Agnieszka Nowaczek
1,
Zygmunt Kowalski
1,
Joanna Kulczycka
2,* and
Agnieszka Makara
3
1
Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7, 31-261 Kraków, Poland
2
Faculty of Management, AGH University of Krakow, Gramatyka 10, 30-067 Kraków, Poland
3
Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7210; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167210
Submission received: 8 May 2025 / Revised: 4 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 August 2025 / Published: 9 August 2025

Abstract

Valuable eco-innovations are emerging through increasingly close collaboration between the scientific community, industry, the energy sector, and public institutions supporting research, development, and the commercialization of new technologies that address specific market needs. Today, the implementation of eco-innovations is a key factor across many sectors and constitutes a significant barrier to market entry. This study identifies the key drivers of the implementation of eco-innovation in the Polish tire industry, which ranks among the lowest in the EU in terms of the adoption of eco-innovation. Legal regulations—particularly those related to the circular economy and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)—emerged as the strongest drivers, as indicated by over 60% of the companies surveyed. Financial support and incentives, such as tax relief, were emphasized by 70% of respondents as crucial for accelerating eco-innovation. This study also highlights significant barriers, including limited access to capital (cited by 65% of respondents) and the high costs associated with eco-innovative methods. Green public procurement and the certification status were recognized as important, albeit less impactful, factors. Expert interviews confirm these findings, underscoring the need for improved public funding mechanisms and stronger legislative support to overcome the current stagnation. This research concludes that without such measures, progress in eco-innovation within the sector may remain slow, thereby hindering the achievement of sustainable development goals.

1. Introduction

Globally, approximately 3 billion car tires are manufactured each year, from which about 1.5 billion worn tires are treated as waste. These tires are mostly used for passenger cars and trucks. Worldwide, the total quantity of end-of-life (ELT) tires is estimated to exceed 20 million tons annually, of which over 14 million tons are recycled [1,2,3]. Tires are among the most recycled and reclaimed products in the U.S. The utilization of end-of-life tires has been a priority for the U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association (USTMA) members for almost three decades. USTMA promotes market progress and advocates for federal and state regulations supporting sustainable tire recycling markets. The 2023 ELT Tires Management Report shows that approximately 79% of ELTs are recycled or reclaimed [1,2].
In the European Union, the generation of ELTs is estimated at 3.2 million tons per year, of which over half are recycled into materials and more than 30% are recovered as energy. The material recovery rates of ELTs are similar in the EU and globally (52% and 51%, respectively) [3,4]. According to data from 2018, Poland produces over 36 million tires per year [5,6]. Data from [3,5] indicate that only about 35% of tires produced are recycled, and 76.55% are reused. Market analyses of tire production show intensive development in both tire manufacturing and methods of utilization, driven by technological advances and ecological innovations [5,6,7].
Organizations operating in the tire sector strive to gain a competitive advantage by increasing economic and environmental efficiency and reducing production costs. Consequently, technological and organizational solutions take account of environmental, economic, and social conditions that can significantly affect how they operate. This concept continues to gain popularity and has been present for years in the scientific literature, legal acts, strategic documents, decrees, and directives [8].
The definition of eco-innovation is closely related to the definition of innovation [9], which, according to the OECD [10], refers to activities involving the implementation of a new or significantly improved product, technology, service, marketing, or organizational method in business practice. The main types of innovation are distinguished as product innovation concerning products and services, and business process innovation, which involves enterprise processes such as production, distribution, marketing and sales, information and communication systems, and administration and management [10].
Innovation is also sometimes defined as the introduction of a new product, service, production method, market, or organizational structure [11]. In a broader sense, innovation is perceived as a complex management process leading to the creation, development, and implementation of new solutions within the body that creates or introduces them [12]. Thus, innovation can be understood as a technological change that serves as a fundamental element in the business sector aiming to achieve success. The creation of innovation within an organization is based on the search for new information, knowledge, and solutions, supported by organizational systems, incentive structures, and internal communication and interpersonal relations [13].
The concept of innovation is closely linked to sustainable development (SD), integrating economic, social, and environmental aspects [14]. The element that connects innovation and sustainable development is eco-innovation [15], defined as any innovation that contributes to sustainable development by reducing the negative impact on the environment. Eco-innovation is an evolving concept closely related to the current state of knowledge in environmental protection and to objectives set at the organizational level, in government programs, and in strategies supporting sustainable development and environmental protection [16].
Eco-innovations implemented in the tire sector are economic, social, technical, and, most importantly, ecological [17]. The main objectives of introducing eco-innovations within organizations are: (a) reducing or eliminating negative environmental impacts, (b) improving economic outcomes, such as lowering operating costs, (c) enhancing the company’s image among stakeholders, the public, and ecological organizations, (d) improving safety and working conditions, and (e) increasing the company’s perceived value among current and prospective investors.
The determinants of eco-innovative activities in enterprises are defined as sets of external (exogenous) and internal (endogenous) factors that initiate the generation of new ideas and solutions and support the creation of inventions that mitigate negative environmental impacts [15]. External factors influencing eco-innovation include competitiveness, consumer expectations, environmental regulations, scientific and technological advances, economic and social progress, and environmental changes [17]. Internal factors primarily relate to the management system within an organization, including ecological awareness and the aspirations of managers, voluntary commitments, environmental policies, and competition strategies [18,19]. The tire sector is developing dynamically, including both tire production and recycling activities. The tire market in Poland has undergone significant changes in recent years, with both declines and growth observed across different segments.
Tires produced from new raw materials, biodegradable tires, 3D-printed tires, and tires utilizing new technologies—such as self-repairing and air-purifying tires or those integrated with artificial intelligence—represent important elements of a modern, ecological, and innovative production sector. Conversely, new technologies and pro-environmental solutions enabling efficient recycling and waste management (used tires) stimulate the entire tire sector towards eco-innovative activities [3,6].
In the face of increasing regulatory pressure, rising consumer expectations, and growing environmental challenges, companies are progressively integrating eco-innovations as a key component of their development strategies. This trend is particularly relevant in the tire industry, which—due to its scale and environmental impact—plays a significant role in the broader industrial transition toward sustainable development.
This study aims to identify the key internal and external factors influencing the development of eco-innovation in the tire sector and analyze how these factors stimulate innovative activities aimed at reducing environmental impact.
The analysis encompasses both external factors—such as market competition, environmental regulations, consumer expectations, and technological progress—and internal factors, including the ecological awareness of managerial staff, competitive strategies, and internal environmental policies. Understanding the role of these elements enables a more accurate assessment to be made of what facilitates the effective implementation of eco-innovations and how this process can be enhanced in economic practice. The key determinants of eco-innovation include factors related to organizational characteristics, the adoption of technology, market-driven incentives, and current as well as anticipated environmental regulations [19,20,21].
The novelty of this publication lies in its comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the development of eco-innovation in the tire sector—a field that, despite its increasing importance in the sustainable transformation of industry, remains relatively underexplored in the academic literature. The study considers both external drivers (such as regulations, competition, technological advances, and consumer pressure) and internal ones (including managerial awareness, environmental strategies, and voluntary commitments), as well as their interdependencies.
A distinctive feature of this study is its focus on the dynamically evolving tire market in Poland and its emphasis on the impact of modern technologies—such as biodegradable materials, 3D printing, artificial intelligence, and intelligent recycling management systems—in fostering environmentally friendly innovation. As such, this publication makes a meaningful contribution to the understanding of sector-specific eco-innovation and offers practical insights for policymakers and businesses aiming to advance sustainable development.

2. Methods

2.1. Description of the Polish Tire Market

The Polish tire market is divided into two demand categories, the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and Replacement segments, with the latter representing the larger share [5]. Several factors contribute to the prominence of the Replacement segment. Tire wear due to regular use necessitates periodic replacements, thereby driving demand. By tire type, the market is segmented into Radial and Bias (cross-ply) tires, which differ in their fundamental structural composition and consequently in performance and application. Radial tires are constructed with layers of cords running radially from the center of the tire, offering enhanced stability, fuel efficiency, and a smoother ride. Bias tires, in contrast, feature crisscrossed layers of cords that provide increased durability and load-bearing capacity, making them suitable for heavy-duty applications [22,23,24].
By sales channel, the Polish tire market is divided into the Online segment and the larger Dealer/Exclusive Outlet segment. The latter benefits from a well-established presence, offering customers the ability to inspect products in person and receive expert advice from experienced staff.
Based on tube type, the market is categorized into Tube and Tubeless segments. Tube tires include an inner tube that holds air pressure within the tire casing. While historically widespread, their popularity has declined due to advances in tire technology. In contrast, the Tubeless segment has experienced substantial growth and modernization. Tubeless tires form an airtight seal against the rim, eliminating the need for an inner tube. This design offers several advantages, such as a reduced risk of sudden deflation, improved fuel efficiency, and enhanced overall performance.
Major players in the Polish tire market include Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear, Continental, Pirelli, Hankook, Dunlop, Nokian Tyres, Apollo Tyres, and Cooper Tires. To increase their market share, these companies are investing in innovation, strategic partnerships, and expansion initiatives [22,23].
In 2024, the Polish tire market began to show signs of recovery, with overall tire sales increasing. Growth was recorded in the passenger car, SUV, agricultural, and industrial segments. In the third quarter of 2024, the growth dynamics remained evident, particularly in the SUV, agricultural, and industrial sectors. Sales of tires for passenger cars and delivery vehicles also increased, while the truck segment remained stable. The only segment to experience a decline was motorcycle tires. These data indicate dynamic changes in the Polish tire market, with a clear rebound in 2024 after earlier declines, especially in the SUV, agricultural, and industrial segments [5,23]. Table 1 presents percentage changes in tire sales across various segments. Declines in 2022 and 2023 are visible, as well as a clear rebound in 2024, particularly in the SUV, agricultural, and industrial sectors.
Tire recycling in Poland in 2022–2024 remained a key element of the environmental protection strategy, aimed at minimizing the impact of used tires on the ecosystem. In 2021, approximately 354.7 thousand tons more of tires were recycled compared to previous years [23,24]. In Poland, the Tire Disposal Center is the key company responsible for tire collection [20]. The basic fee in February 2024 was EUR 0.69 per tire. In 2021, approximately 252,600 tons of tires were put into circulation. The recovery rate was 74.7% and the recycling rate was 44.5%, placing Poland among the European Union countries with lower tire recycling rates. For comparison, in Spain, the minimum recovery rate for used tires is 100%, of which at least 80% must be recycled and 20% used for energy recovery. In Slovakia, the minimum recycling rate is 75% and the recovery rate is 24% [22].
Poland produces approximately 300,000 tons of used tires per year, while its domestic processing capacity can handle over 400,000 tons, demonstrating untapped potential in this area. Additionally, 35,000 tires are illegally dumped in forests every year, posing a serious threat to the environment. Hence, it is necessary to increase the efficiency of the tire recycling system in Poland and to raise public awareness regarding the proper management of used tires [22]. These data emphasize the urgent need for actions to improve both the effectiveness of the tire recycling system in Poland and public awareness of responsible tire disposal. Figure 1 shows the level of recycling of used tires in Poland between 2015 and 2022.
Figure 2 presents a standard tire composed of several fundamental components, including rubber, steel wire, textile fibers, and various chemicals that ensure appropriate hardness, durability, and grip. The primary rubber materials are blends of natural and synthetic rubber, enriched with additives such as carbon black, oils, and antioxidants to improve performance and longevity [3,23,24].
In tire production and its subsequent management, new technologies and an ecological approach are combined. Eco-innovation for tire design refers to their construction, new types of raw materials for production, and new manufacturing technologies. The development of green tires and processing methods and the use of sustainable materials form important trends for the future of the tire industry, and many tire companies have proposed their visions for the development of ecological tires. Rubber, cord fabric, and additives are the main materials used in tire production. Research is being developed on green materials that can meet the requirements of environmental friendliness and sustainable development, replace traditional materials, and decrease the consumption of petroleum resources in existing tire production.
These materials generally encompass natural or bio-based synthetic rubber, green renewable cord fabrics, and auxiliary raw materials used in manufacturing [24]. The Polish tire sector has significant potential but, due to its specific character, increasing competitiveness is only possible through eco-innovations. The circular economy (CE) can significantly influence the shape and development prospects of the sector, stimulate the activity of enterprises, and improve their competitive position. The implementation of the CE model requires long-term strategies in terms of sustainable resource consumption, the development of processing eco-innovations, and economics [6]. In this respect, the leading branches of the tire sector could develop innovative solutions and technologies that allow for the inclusion of more materials from renewable sources in tire production and, above all, extend their service life. All these activities will generate new CE business models and contribute to sustainable economic development.

2.2. Data Collection Methods

This work uses data triangulation [25,26], as this method allows for the research topic and phenomenon to be studied from several perspectives and with several data sources or methods. It aims to create a convergent and in-depth understanding of the topic by examining it from different perspectives. Figure 3 summarizes the tools used in the research process.
An analysis of the literature and documents was the first stage of this research, which identified the factors behind the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector. The analysis of the literature used bibliographic data and citations of articles indexed in selected scientific publications. The basis was literature databases [27,28] and a database of the content of Polish technical journals. First, the criterion for searching texts that met the assumed requirements was established, i.e., searching for texts published in the last 5 years and those that contained the phrase “eco-innovations” in the title. This identified over 200 scientific publications that corresponded to the criteria, which were then selected. The analysis of documents consisted of identifying environmental reports of companies in the tire sector in Poland. The reports were verified in terms of the environmental eco-innovations that had been implemented.
In the next stage, a survey questionnaire was developed. First, a set of questions was prepared, providing potential opportunities to obtain responses to the questions connected to the specific objectives of the work being conducted. The questionnaire that was developed was divided into three parts. The first part was devoted to essential data about the enterprise being studied, the second concerned the eco-innovations implemented, and the third concerned factors and barriers linked to the activities related to eco-innovations that were carried out. This study involved 9 companies operating in tire recycling (95% market share), 4 companies producing tires (100% market share), and 2 recovery enterprises. Of the 15 individuals participating in this study, 6 were members of company management staff, and 9 were employees of environmental protection departments. The third stage of the research process involved submitting the material collected for expert review by specialists in environmental activities and innovation within the tire sector. The target group was carefully selected based on their expertise in the subject matter, extensive experience in the tire industry, and ongoing collaboration with the sector. Five experts participated in this phase of the study.
In the qualitative part of the research, both content analysis and thematic analysis approaches were employed. Document analysis involved a systematic review of over 200 scientific publications and environmental reports issued by companies in the Polish tire sector. These documents were coded using pre-established categories related to carrying out eco-innovation (e.g., technologies used, sustainability indicators, and circular economy strategies).
In addition, responses to the open-ended survey questions and expert interviews were analyzed thematically. Thematic analysis was conducted in accordance with the six-phase procedure proposed by Braun and Clarke [29], which includes data familiarization, initial coding, theme generation, theme review, and narrative production. Following this methodology, we applied inductive coding to identify recurring themes related to eco-innovation drivers, barriers, and policy expectations. The coding process was carried out manually by two researchers to ensure consistency and reliability. Key themes identified included financial support mechanisms, regulatory constraints, and limited consumer awareness.
The integration of content and thematic analysis provided a robust triangulation of data sources and allowed for deeper insights into the structural and organizational conditions influencing the development of eco-innovation in the Polish tire industry.
The selection of economic and environmental indicators for this study was guided by four main criteria:
-
Relevance to the tire sector and eco-innovation goals: Indicators were selected based on their direct connection to sustainable development challenges and opportunities in the tire industry, particularly concerning eco-innovation, implementation of the circular economy, and material recovery processes.
-
Data availability and reliability: Only indicators with accessible and verifiable data—sourced from companies’ environmental reports, national databases, or EU statistics—were considered. This ensured the credibility and comparability of results.
-
Alignment with international sustainability frameworks: Priority was given to indicators consistent with recognized standards, including the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) environmental performance indicators [30], ISO 14001 environmental management principles [31], EU Circular Economy Action Plan metrics for resource efficiency and recycling [7], and benchmarks from the European Tyre and Rubber Manufacturers’ Association (ETRMA) [32].
-
Use in prior scientific research [3,6]: The selected indicators were validated against the academic literature addressing eco-innovation and sustainability performance in industrial sectors, ensuring methodological consistency with earlier studies.
Based on these criteria, the following economic indicators were selected: cost of implementing eco-innovation measures, production efficiency, return on investment, and changes in market share. The environmental indicators included the recycling rate of used tires, recovery rate relative to national targets, use of sustainable or alternative raw materials, and potential for CO2 emissions reduction.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Factors Important for Implementing Eco-Innovations

Eco-innovations constitute a foundational element of the European Union’s new development paradigm. A review of EU and regional strategic documents reveals numerous provisions aimed at promoting and supporting eco-innovation. The introduction of eco-innovations is still not common practice, despite the knowledge of the need to decrease the negative influence of processes and products on the environment. Eco-innovations are a proposal for a new development model for the Polish tire industry [33,34,35]. However, Poland is one of the lowest-ranked EU countries in terms of eco-innovation. The reasons for this are primarily the lack of an effective system for supporting and financing eco-innovations from public funds and the low knowledge of entrepreneurs about the benefits of their implementation. The expansion of the tire sector, together with ecological and innovation policy, should support the development of eco-innovations and encourage investors to seek eco-innovations.
Key factors important for the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire industry were selected and compared with the outcomes of this process in terms of legal and technical conditions, as shown in Figure 4. Additionally, the microeconomic calculation of investment profitability combined with the creation of an ecological image of the enterprise is presented in Figure 5.
The material analyzed shows that the greatest force stimulating the implementation and development of eco-innovations, both among tire producers and recyclers, is legal regulation. The introduction of the circular economy (CE) concept into legal regulations has compelled the entire tire industry to undertake ecological actions, as presented in Table 2.
The eco-design directive introduced in the EU countries [34] and national waste management regulations specifying the recycling level [35,36] have led to eco-innovation developments in the tire sector. However, it should be noted that eco-innovations, due to their complex nature and the need to combine innovation and ecological policies, encounter barriers and hinder rapid development. Hence, it is necessary to develop an effective system for supporting and financing eco-innovations from public funds, combining new financial instruments with legislative guidelines. The most significant barriers to implementing ecological innovations are
  • Lack of financial resources and difficulty accessing capital;
  • Fairly significant costs of eco-innovative methods;
  • Risk of market failure (no return on implementation costs);
  • Deficiency of economic and tax stimulations;
  • Increased competition;
  • Administrative barriers, such as public procurement;
  • Insufficient knowledge about environmental protection, the influence of the company’s activities on the environment, and the economic benefits resulting from eco-innovations (currently, most entrepreneurs perceive ecological innovations from the perspective of high costs).
It is important to identify eco-innovative activities and monitor whether their implementation is in line with the assumptions (economic profitability throughout the value chain, i.e., searching for win–win solutions to minimize resource consumption).

3.2. Identification of Factors in Favor of Implementing Eco-Innovations Based on the Surveys Conducted

The survey aimed to identify factors that may encourage companies to implement eco-innovations. The respondents considered the following as significant conditions encouraging the implementation of eco-innovations:
  • Increasing the recovery limit, which it is possible to achieve, especially for tire recyclers;
  • Financial support;
  • Green public procurement;
  • Certifications;
  • The responsibility of state bodies for implementing eco-innovations in organizations.
Increasing recovery limits is proposed, especially by tire recyclers, because this factor may affect the development of new technologies, and their introduction will stimulate the implementation of eco-innovations. The respondents pointed out that it is important to introduce financial incentives in the form of, for example, reliefs for companies implementing eco-innovations. Recyclers generally lack the so-called “financial bonus” (i.e., an incentive) as compensation for actions taken for the benefit of society and climate improvement. According to the enterprises surveyed, they should be provided with economic support from the sector in the development of eco-innovations. Green public procurement may also be one of the factors encouraging the tire industry to implement eco-innovations, but it should be much more widespread and promoted. In the tire sector, the appropriate certification and status of a product made from waste will also act as a support for eco-innovation. For some respondents, the status of waste is inappropriate for a product element made from recycled raw material. According to them, it should also have the status of a product.
Respondents indicated that state authorities are responsible for the progress of eco-innovations in Poland and activities that have an advantageous influence on the development of the entire tire sector. Some respondents believe that sustainable development and pro-environmental activities are the responsibility of the companies themselves, scientific units, and society.
The innovative activity of a company is identified as the ability to constantly search for, implement, and disseminate innovations accepted by potential consumers (end recipients). Both recyclers and manufacturers considered financial incentives, e.g., tax relief or rewarding innovative companies, to be the most important factor accelerating the implementation of eco-innovations. It is important, as the respondents pointed out, that their efforts in this area are appreciated by, for example, state authorities. Green public procurement was also considered a tool for shaping new standards for products and services, as well as a determinant of the goods, technologies, and innovations manufactured by companies. At the same time, the introduction of green public procurement will be a driving force for the development of eco-innovation in companies. The respondents indicated that having certificates was important as a stimulus for putting the principles of sustainable development into practice. The respondents placed significant emphasis on the responsibility of state authorities for implementing eco-innovations in organizations. Figure 6 shows the percentages of the most common answers regarding factors encouraging the implementation of eco-innovations in the organization.
The most significant issues identified by the group that was interviewed concern factors related to financial support, particularly in the form of tax relief and financial incentives, such as for implementation and investment projects. An increase in waste recovery limits was also noted as important among recyclers. Eco-innovations and certifications were regarded as stimuli for the implementation and promotion of green public procurement. Conversely, state authorities are most often held responsible regarding legal regulations aimed at stimulating the progress of eco-innovations in the tire sector.

3.3. Identification of Factors Influencing Eco-Innovation Implementation Based on Expert Interviews

The next stage of the research involved conducting a focused group interview (FGI) to verify the findings obtained from the in-depth interviews. The target group was selected very precisely based on their knowledge, extensive experience in the tire sector, and cooperation within it [37]. A Likert scale [38], the most commonly used tool for measuring attitudes, was employed to allow for the capture of many aspects of the phenomenon being studied. A five-point ordinal scale was used: 1—strongly disagree, 2—disagree, 3—neither agree nor disagree, 4—agree, 5—strongly agree.
The study results, showing factors impacting the achievements of eco-innovation in the tire sector, were discussed and assessed. Table 3 and Figure 7 present expert opinions and evaluations regarding these factors.
Experts indicated that financial support for companies is essential if they are to put new, environmentally and economically friendly solutions into practice. They also highlighted the country’s still very low eco-innovation rate, attributing it to the lack of appropriate incentives. According to the experts, all initiatives related to eco-innovation, especially green public procurement and certification, should be introduced and supported. State authorities are largely responsible for the current situation, and if no changes occur in this area, the entire economy’s progress may be slowed down. One interview participant stated that increasing recovery limits would not significantly accelerate the implementation of eco-innovation in the tire industry.

4. Discussion

The study results indicate that financial support is one of the most significant factors driving the development of eco-innovations. Green public procurement and product and company certification rank slightly lower in importance. Activities by state bodies, particularly in terms of their responsibility for promoting eco-innovation within the economy, are considered less influential. Measures aimed at increasing waste recovery targets are ranked the lowest. The ranking is presented in Table 4.
Companies in the tire industry are already implementing advanced technological solutions, including nanotechnology and biotechnology, to reduce fuel consumption and pollutant emissions. However, challenges related to recycling end-of-life tires highlight the necessity of incorporating environmental considerations during product design. Recyclers, in turn, are compelled to develop new technologies that minimize environmental degradation. Despite recognizing the potential of eco-innovations, respondents emphasize the lack of appropriate systemic drivers and financial support, which hinders the growth of this sector [39].
The tire industry is actively working on “green tires” using alternative raw materials, such as silica instead of carbon black, and plant-based or synthetic compounds that contribute to reducing oil consumption and CO2 emissions. Nevertheless, a research gap remains regarding the actual impact of these innovations on micro-particle emissions and chemical substances from tires. Additionally, sufficient data on their durability and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional tires are lacking, which may limit commercialization and consumer acceptance [40,41,42]. Therefore, developing concepts for new materials and innovations, along with environmentally friendly and cost-effective methods for rubber recycling, represents one of the greatest environmental challenges of the 21st century [43,44,45].
Significant legal regulation barriers for recyclers include high environmental requirements (e.g., meeting specific standards and emission levels) coupled with low waste recovery limits in Poland. Recyclers are capable of achieving much higher recycling rates than legally required; however, due to the low recovery targets, they struggle to secure sufficient quantities of waste tires domestically. Consequently, recovery organizations consider importing raw materials from abroad to maintain their operations. Recyclers have highlighted the stringent environmental standards, high emission requirements, and necessary certifications as barriers to implementing ecological innovations [3,5].
Sustainable Tire Composition [23,45] is the first step towards creating eco-friendly tires by using alternative raw materials. Manufacturers are exploring synthetic blends, often incorporating silica, as a replacement for traditional rubber. The overall construction of the tire—from treads to sidewalls—is crucial for maintaining eco-friendliness. Furthermore, a more robust tire structure improves vehicle stability, enhancing overall performance and safety. Proper tire selection and maintenance can extend the tire life, thereby reducing waste and the frequency of replacements [46,47,48].
When analyzed in terms of Sustainable Tire Management Systems, tire recycling processes—such as collection, sorting, shredding, steel separation, granulation, and purification—are well-developed and enable material reuse in various sectors, including construction and as industrial fuel. However, this process is costly and requires continuous investments in technology, underlining the need for stable financial and regulatory support [48,49,50,51]. Moreover, tire recycling programs [46,47] are gaining momentum, with several manufacturers incorporating recycled materials into new tires [52,53].
Approximately 20–30% of greenhouse gas emissions in the automotive sector originate from tire production and use. Implementing a Sustainable Development and Circular Economy (CE) model in this sector requires effective collaboration between science and industry, alongside adherence to the 7R principles (reduce, reuse, recycle, etc.) [54,55]. In practice, however, legislative and organizational barriers—particularly related to increasing recovery and recycling targets—impede the implementation of such models.
Eco-innovations in the tire sector are increasingly important from both environmental protection and business competitiveness perspectives [56,57,58]. These factors condition the implementation of eco-innovations. Government support through funding and credit facilities is essential but should be better tailored to company needs and aligned with international regulations. Green public procurement can be an effective tool for creating demand for innovative products; however, clear criteria and enforcement mechanisms are required. Product and process certification play significant roles in building trust and a market advantage but remain undervalued by many producers and consumers.
Despite technological progress and growing interest in eco-innovations, a significant gap persists between their potential and actual levels of implementation. Financial support remains the main factor determining innovation success, highlighting the need for systemic changes in public policy. Insufficient government engagement and coordination, along with a lack of effective incentive mechanisms, limit the scale of sector transformation. Furthermore, limited consumer awareness and knowledge about the ecological and economic benefits of “green” tires hinder market growth. Finally, legislative barriers related to recovery and recycling targets should be prioritized to accelerate the implementation of the circular economy model [55,56].
An integrated approach combining financing, regulation, market education, and technological innovation is crucial in order to effectively develop eco-innovations in the tire sector, benefiting both the environment and the economy. Financial support is the primary factor stimulating eco-innovation development in the tire sector. However, a clear lack of systemic incentives and adequate support hinders the full potential of these innovations. Compared to existing studies, our findings confirm commonly known barriers to implementing ecological innovations while additionally emphasizing the specificity of the tire industry, where issues related to tire design for recycling and effective waste management remain insufficiently addressed.
Moreover, our analysis shows that despite the implementation of advanced technologies and eco-friendly materials, practical limitations arising from legal regulations, insufficient financial incentives, and the complexity of recycling processes prevent the sector from achieving its full environmental potential. In that context, this study offers a new perspective on the complexity of tire lifecycle management and the need for an integrated approach combining technological innovation, legal frameworks, and economic support mechanisms.

5. Conclusions

In the EU countries, increasing attention is being paid to the innovation of companies that generate large amounts of waste and use large amounts of primary raw materials. This is necessary in a situation of increasing market needs and limited access to raw materials. Valuable eco-innovations are increasingly created thanks to cooperation between the world of science, the tire industry, alternative energy, and public institutions supporting research and development. Thanks to this cooperation, innovations and new technologies have practical applications that meet specific market needs and requirements.
Eco-innovations are a basic tool with which entrepreneurs from the tire sector can increase the company’s competitive potential and improve its place in the environment. Implementing eco-innovations is a key issue in many industries and a specific barrier to entry. However, smaller companies, especially recyclers, have problems with generating innovative solutions, mainly due to the level of knowledge and technological advancement.
Legal and regulatory frameworks are the primary drivers of eco-innovation in the Polish tire sector, with over 60% of companies indicating these as the main stimulating factor. Financial incentives, including tax reliefs and preferential loans, were identified by approximately 70% of respondents as key to fostering eco-innovative investments. Major barriers include limited financial resources (noted by 65% of companies surveyed), high implementation costs, and administrative obstacles. While green public procurement and product certification support eco-innovation, their influence remains moderate and requires wider adoption and promotion. Expert opinions emphasize that without enhanced financial and legislative support, Poland’s tire industry will continue to lag in eco-innovation, risking slower overall economic and environmental progress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N.; methodology, A.N. and Z.K.; software, A.M.; validation, J.K. and A.M.; formal analysis, A.N.; investigation, A.N.; resources, A.N. and Z.K.; data curation, A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N. and Z.K.; writing—review and editing, A.N. and A.M.; visualization, A.N. and A.M.; supervision, Z.K.; project administration, J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Amick, S. Sustainability: A Driving Force for the U.S. Tire Manufacturing Industry, U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association. Available online: https://www.ustires.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/USTMA_Sustainability_2018_1.16_PAGES.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2025).
  2. U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association. Tire Recycling Sources. Available online: https://www.ustires.org/tire-recycling (accessed on 21 March 2025).
  3. Nowaczek, A.; Kowalski, Z.; Kulczycka, J.; Makara, A. Determinants of the Implementation of a Circular Economy Model in the Tire Sector in Poland. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. European Comission. Press Release. 13 July 2023. Circular Economy: Improving Design and End-of-Life Management of Cars for More Resource-Efficient Automotive Sector. Available online: https://errin.eu/news/circular-economy-improving-design-and-end-life-management-cars-more-resource-efficient (accessed on 4 August 2025).
  5. Polish Tire Industry Association. Available online: https://pzpo.org.pl/ (accessed on 20 August 2024).
  6. Nowaczek, A. Transformation of the Tire Sector in Poland—Towards A Circular Economy; Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Krakow, Poland, 2024; Volume 218, ISSN 19085-23. ISBN 978-83-67606-41-7. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  7. European Commission. Scoping Study to Identify Potential Circular Economy Actions, Priority Sectors, Material Flows and Value Chains; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2014; Available online: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/scoping-study.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2024).
  8. Massa, L.; Tucci, C.L. Business model innovation. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management; Dodgson, M., Gann, D.M., Phillips, N., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 420–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. OECD, Statistical Office of the European Communities. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed.; The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bukowska-Piestrzyńska, A.; Doński-Lesiuk, J.; Karkowski, T.A.; Motowidlak, U. Innovative Solutions in Logistics: Selected Aspects; University of Lódź Publishing House: Łódź, Poland, 2020; pp. 1–133. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  11. Matysik, S. An overview of the concept of innovation. Research Reviews of Czestochowa University of Technology. Management 2024, 1, 160–176. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ober, J.P. Adaptation of Innovation in the Light of Organizational Behavior: Selected Aspects; Monograph, 916; Silesian University of Technology Publishing House: Gliwice, Poland, 2022. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  13. Kowalski, Z.; Kulczycka, J.; Makara, A.; Mondello, G.; Salomone, R. Industrial Symbiosis for Sustainable Management of Meat Waste: The Case of Smiłowo Eco-Industrial Park, Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bojewska, B. Innovations in a Sustainable Enterprise. Stud. Work. Coll. Manag. Financ. Wars. Sch. Econ. 2024, 197, 179–190. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nowakowska, P. Human Resources Management in an Innovative Enterprise. Innov. Manag. Econ. Bus. 2023, 1/36, 49–61. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Szuper, K. Post-IPO Innovative Firm Performance. Sci. Pap. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. 2023, 188, 621–633. Available online: https://managementpapers.polsl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/188-Szuper.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025). [CrossRef]
  17. Burzyńska, D.; Hajdys, D. Eco-innovations in the Enterprises—Determinants and Sources of Funding. Acta Univ. Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica 2021, 1, 63–86. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Markowska, M. Diversification of innovation in the classes of regions of the European space distinguished by the structure of employees. Scientific Works of the University of Economics in Wrocław. Probl. Reg. Dev. 2011, 180, 92–105. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  19. Tundys, B. Green supply chain in the circular economy—Assumptions, relationships, implications. Sci. Work. Univ. Econ. Wrocław 2015, 383, 288–301. [Google Scholar]
  20. Polish Tire Industry Association. Tire Sales in Poland in 2022–2024. Available online: https://pzpo.org.pl/sprzedaz-opon-w-2024-roku/ (accessed on 20 March 2025). (In Polish).
  21. Poland Tire Market. Competitive Landscape & Forecast. 2019–2029. Blue Weave Consulting. Market Report. ID: BWC23757. 2023. Available online: https://www.blueweaveconsulting.com/report/poland-tire-market/report-sample (accessed on 17 October 2024).
  22. Polish Tire Recyclers Association (PSRO). PSRO 2024 Report—Tire Recycling in Poland. Available online: https://psro.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Raport-PSRO-2024.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2025). (In Polish).
  23. Thomas, J.; Patil, R. The Road to Sustainable Tire Materials: Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 2209–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deng, S.; Chen, R.; Duan, S.; Jia, Q.; Hao, X.; Zhang, L. Research progress on sustainability of key tire materials. Sus. Mat. 2023, 3, 581–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Denzin, N.K. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook, 1st ed.; Routledge: Now York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 1–600. [Google Scholar]
  26. Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Web of Science, Data Base. Available online: https://spubl.pl/blog/web-of-science-database-characteristics-of-scientific-publications (accessed on 21 March 2024).
  28. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Idowu, S.O.; Schmidpeter, R.; Capaldi, N.; Zu, L.; Del Baldo, M.; Abreu, R. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. ISO 14001:2015; Environmental Management Systems—Requirements with Guidance for Use. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  32. Jahic, N. ETRMA Report: Tyre Market Overview in Q3 2024. Available online: https://www.commercialtyrebusiness.com/etrma-report-tyre-market-overview-in-q3-2024/ (accessed on 24 June 2025).
  33. Rutkowska-Podołowska, M.; Pakulska, J. Capital Expenditure on Waste Management. Res. Pap. Wrocław Univ. Econ. 2016, 454, 196–207. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 Establishing a Framework for the Setting of Ecodesign Requirements for Energy-Using Products and Amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L191/29, 22.7.2005. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32005L0032 (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  35. Regulation of the Minister of Climate and Environment of 19 December 2021 on the Annual Recycling Levels of Packaging Waste in Individual Years Until 2030. Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, Warsaw, 21 December 2021, item 2375. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/ (accessed on 17 October 2024). (In Polish)
  36. Bargieł, R. Eco-innovation in the context of sustainable development of organization. Scientific Journals of the West Pomeranian Business School of the Academy of Applied Sciences, ZPSB. Co. Mark. 2023, 2, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
  37. Manzano, A. Conducting focus groups in realist evaluation. Evaluation 2022, 28, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Joshi, A.; Kale, S.; Chandel, S.; Pal, D.K. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. García-Pozuelo Ramos, D.; Afshari, F.; Martínez Casanova, M.A.; Viadero-Monasterio, F.; Álvarez-Caldas, C.; Calvo Ramos, J.A. Designing a New Sustainable and Instrumented Tire: ECOTIRE. In New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science, Proceedings of EuCoMeS 2024; Rosati, G., Gasparetto, A., Ceccarelli, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; Volume 165, pp. 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wojciechowski, A.; Żmuda, W.; Dolinski, A. Thermal decomposition of tires and residual char utilizing. Logistyka 2014, 6, 11278–11288. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  41. Olawińska-Wypych, J. Possibilities of thermal processing of rubber waste. Mater. Econ. Logist. J. 2021, 7, 33–41. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rødland, E.S.; Binda, G.; Spanu, D.; Carnati, S.; Röhler Bjerke, L.; Nizzetto, L. Are eco-friendly “green” tires also chemically green? Comparing metals, rubbers and selected organic compounds in green and conventional tires. J. Haz. Mat. 2024, 476, 135042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rodrigues, G.F.C.; Oliveira, N.P. Impacts of Green Tire Technology: Case Study of Environmental and Customer Perspectives. In Water, Energy and Food Nexus in the Context of Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation; Climate Change Management; Leal Filho, W., de Andrade Guerra, J.B.S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bijina, V.; Jandas, P.J.; Joseph, S.; Gopu, J.; Abhitha, K.; John, H. Recent trends in industrial and academic developments of green tyre technology. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 8215–8244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Araujo-Morera, J.; Verdejo, R.; López-Manchado, M.A.; Hernández Santana, M. Sustainable mobility: The route of tires through the circular economy model. Waste Manag. 2021, 126, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. National Waste Management Plan (NWMP) 2021–2028. Available online: https://projects2014-2020.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1652824201.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2024).
  47. Act of 14 December 2012 on Waste (Journal of Laws 2023, item 1587). Part II. General Principles of Waste Management. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20230001587 (accessed on 17 October 2024). (In Polish)
  48. Sambucci, M.; Marini, D.; Valente, M. Tire Recycled rubber for more eco-sustainable advanced cementitious aggregate. Recycling 2020, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Piotrowska, K.; Kruszelnicka, W.; Bałdowska-Witos, P.; Kasner, R.; Rudnicki, J.; Tomporowski, A.; Flizikowski, J.; Opielak, M. Assessment of the environmental impact of a car tire throughout its lifecycle using the LCA method. Materials 2019, 12, 4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Şoica, A.; Budală, A.; Comănescu, I.S. Tyres influence on vehicle fuel economy. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 997, 012134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Andersen, L.G.; Larsen, J.K.; Fraser, E.S.; Schmidt, B.; Dyre, J.C. Rolling Resistance Measurement and Model Development. J. Transport. Eng. 2015, 141, 04014075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chicu, N.; Prioteasa, A.-L.; Deaconu, A. Current trends and perspectives in tyre industry. Stud. Univ. “Vasile Goldis” Arad—Econ. Ser. 2020, 30, 36–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Araujo-Morera, J.; Hernández Santana, M.; Verdejo, R.; López-Manchado, M.A. Giving a Second Opportunity to Tire Waste: An Alternative Path for the Development of Sustainable Self-Healing Styrene–Butadiene Rubber Compounds Overcoming the Magic Triangle of Tires. Polymers 2019, 11, 2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano, C.; Samani, P.; van der Meer, Y. How can the circular economy support the advancement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? A comprehensive analysis. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 40, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S.A. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kowalski, Z.; Kulczycka, J.; Banach, M.; Makara, A. A Complex Circular-Economy Quality Indicator for Assessing Production Systems at the Micro Level. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kowalski, Z.; Makara, A. The circular economy model used in the polish agro-food consortium: A case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Makara, A.; Kowalski, Z. Selection of pig manure management strategies: Case study of Polish farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Recycling rate of used tires in Poland, 2015–2022.
Figure 1. Recycling rate of used tires in Poland, 2015–2022.
Sustainability 17 07210 g001
Figure 2. Percentage composition of materials used in tire production.
Figure 2. Percentage composition of materials used in tire production.
Sustainability 17 07210 g002
Figure 3. Diagram of the research process: Data collection methods and triangulation techniques.
Figure 3. Diagram of the research process: Data collection methods and triangulation techniques.
Sustainability 17 07210 g003
Figure 4. Legal and technical conditions as factors favoring the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Figure 4. Legal and technical conditions as factors favoring the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Sustainability 17 07210 g004
Figure 5. Microeconomic calculation of investment profitability and creating an ecological image as factors favoring the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Figure 5. Microeconomic calculation of investment profitability and creating an ecological image as factors favoring the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Sustainability 17 07210 g005
Figure 6. Percentage distribution of the most common opinions regarding factors encouraging the implementation of eco-innovations among tire enterprises.
Figure 6. Percentage distribution of the most common opinions regarding factors encouraging the implementation of eco-innovations among tire enterprises.
Sustainability 17 07210 g006
Figure 7. Expert assessment of factors influencing the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Figure 7. Expert assessment of factors influencing the implementation of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Sustainability 17 07210 g007
Table 1. Development of the tire market in Poland, 2022–2024.
Table 1. Development of the tire market in Poland, 2022–2024.
Tire Segment2022202320242024
1231–3
Cars−4%−14%+9%+3%
SUVs+8%−13%+33%+16%
Vans−4%−28%+9%−3%
Trucks0%−36%+1%−1%
Motorcycles+4.8%0%−15%−2%
Agricultural−17%−47%+25%+19%
Industrial−11%−28%+20%+23%
Summer-−24.3%--
Winter-−11.9%--
All-season-+1.8%--
Table 2. Expected trends in the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Table 2. Expected trends in the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
CriterionExpected Trend of Eco-Innovation Development
Legal conditionsIncreased development of eco-innovations due to the implementation of new legal regulations, e.g., Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR).
Technical conditionsMaintaining technological eco-innovations at the current level due to high costs and the availability of new technologies for tire production and recycling.
Microeconomic calculation of investment profitabilityIncreased eco-innovations because entrepreneurs have seen the possibility of reducing operating costs by investing in ecological solutions.
Creating an ecological image of enterprisesDecrease or maintenance at the current level because it is not a key factor driving the development of eco-innovations.
Table 3. Expert opinions on factors influencing the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Table 3. Expert opinions on factors influencing the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
The Goal of the StudySelected Quotes from Experts
Assessment of factors influencing the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector[E1] “The awareness of entrepreneurs in the field of circular economy and available solutions affects the possibility of their creation and implementation. Awareness largely determines the openness and demand for this type of eco-innovation, which is why it is necessary to introduce appropriate financial instruments”
[E2] “At the level of large companies, no one will allow themselves to depart from this trend of eco-innovation, or this trend may slow down a bit. But there will be no turn in the other direction.”
[E5] “Support instruments may be related not only to the implementation of specific technologies, there may also be innovations related to changes in business models—by promoting resource-efficient enterprises
[E2] “To stimulate innovation in this area, appropriate incentives are necessary and all initiatives should be promoted”
[E1] “Recovery limits are a secondary issue, they will not affect the development of eco-innovation”
[E5] “It is important to encourage the entire sector, reliefs and preferential loans are a good direction”
Table 4. Rank of factors stimulating the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Table 4. Rank of factors stimulating the development of eco-innovations in the tire sector.
Rating TypeProducer
Rank
Recycler RankExpert RankOverall Rank
Raising the waste recovery limit5254.0
Financial support1111.0
Green public procurement2322.3
Certifications2232.3
Responsibility of state bodies4343.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nowaczek, A.; Kowalski, Z.; Kulczycka, J.; Makara, A. Ecological Innovations Supporting Sustainable Development: The Case of the Polish Tire Industry. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167210

AMA Style

Nowaczek A, Kowalski Z, Kulczycka J, Makara A. Ecological Innovations Supporting Sustainable Development: The Case of the Polish Tire Industry. Sustainability. 2025; 17(16):7210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nowaczek, Agnieszka, Zygmunt Kowalski, Joanna Kulczycka, and Agnieszka Makara. 2025. "Ecological Innovations Supporting Sustainable Development: The Case of the Polish Tire Industry" Sustainability 17, no. 16: 7210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167210

APA Style

Nowaczek, A., Kowalski, Z., Kulczycka, J., & Makara, A. (2025). Ecological Innovations Supporting Sustainable Development: The Case of the Polish Tire Industry. Sustainability, 17(16), 7210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop