An Adaptation of the Quality–Loyalty Model to Study Green Consumer Loyalty
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Framework
2.1. Green Loyalty Intention and Green Purchase Behavior
2.2. Affective Commitment (to Green Products)
2.3. Green Perceived Value
2.4. Green Satisfaction
2.5. Green Perceived Quality
3. Methodology
3.1. Constructs and Measurement
3.2. Sample and Data Collection
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Data Analysis
4.2. Discussion
4.3. Implications
5. Conclusions, Limitations, and Future Research
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ritter, Á.M.; Borchardt, M.; Vaccaro, G.L.R.; Pereira, G.M.; Almeida, F. Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: Exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonini, S.; Oppenheim, J. Cultivating the green consumer. Stanf. Soc. Innov. Rev. 2008, 6, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- OECD Business Insights on Emerging Markets 2019; OECD: Paris, France, 2019.
- World_Bank. GDP Growth (Annual %). Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG (accessed on 15 March 2020).
- Gelderman, C.; Schijns, J.; Lambrechts, W.; Vijgen, S. Green marketing as an environmental practice: The impact on green satisfaction and green loyalty in a business-to-business context. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 2061–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darnall, N.; Ponting, C.; Vazquez-Brust, D. Why Consumers Buy Green; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 287–308. [Google Scholar]
- White, K.; Habib, R.; Hardisty, D. How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework. J. Mark. 2019, 83, 002224291982564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 2015, 3, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megha. Determinants of green consumption: A systematic literature review using the TCCM approach. Front. Sustain. 2024, 5, 1428764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gazi, M.A.; Masud, A.; Yusof, M.F.; Billah, M.; Islam, M.A.; Hossain, M. The green mindset: How consumers’ attitudes, intentions, and concerns shape their purchase decisions. Environ. Res. Commun. 2024, 6, 025009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, M.; Al Amin, M.; Arefin, M.; Mostafa, T. Green consumers’ behavioral intention and loyalty to use mobile organic food delivery applications: The role of social supports, sustainability perceptions, and religious consciousness. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 26, 15953–16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, N.; Guo, M.; Bu, X.; Jin, C. Understanding green loyalty: A literature review based on bibliometric-content analysis. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, N.; Southeastern, N. Commitment, Loyalty And Customer Lifetime Value: Investigating The Relationships Among Key Determinants. J. Bus. Econ. Res. (JBER) 2010, 8, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cronin, J.J., Jr.; Brady, M.K.; Hult, G.T.M. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J. Retail. 2000, 76, 193–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Chang, C.H. Towards green trust: The influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction. Manag. Decis. 2013, 51, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, T.K.; Kumar, A.; Jakhar, S.; Luthra, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kazancoglu, I.; Nayak, S.S. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suttikun, C.; Meeprom, S. Examining the effect of perceived quality of authentic souvenir product, perceived value, and satisfaction on customer loyalty. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1976468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rather, R.A.; Tehseen, S.; Itoo, M.H.; Parrey, S.H. Customer brand identification, affective commitment, customer satisfaction, and brand trust as antecedents of customer behavioral intention of loyalty: An empirical study in the hospitality sector. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2019, 29, 196–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, N.J.; Meyer, J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 1990, 63, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quero, M.; Ventura, R. Affective commitment and future purchase intentions in the performing arts: An empirical approach: Commitment and purchase intentions. Can. J. Adm. Sci./Rev. Can. Des Sci. De L’administration 2015, 32, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, S.U.; Bhatti, A.; Mohamed, R.; Ayoup, H. The moderating role of trust and commitment between consumer purchase intention and online shopping behavior in the context of Pakistan. J. Glob. Entrep. Res. 2019, 9, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei-Ming, O.; Chia-Mei, S.; Chin-Yuan, C.; Kuo-Chang, W. Relationships among customer loyalty programs, service quality, relationship quality and loyalty: An empirical study. Chin. Manag. Stud. 2011, 5, 194–206. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, J.; Wu, H.-C.; Cheng, C.-C. An Empirical Analysis of Synthesizing the Effects of Festival Quality, Emotion, Festival Image and Festival Satisfaction on Festival Loyalty: A Case Study of Macau Food Festival. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2015, 17, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.-C.; Li, T. A Study of Experiential Quality, Perceived Value, Heritage Image, Experiential Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions for Heritage Tourists. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2017, 41, 904–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanford, S. Antecedents and Outcomes of Hospitality Loyalty:A Meta-Analysis. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2016, 57, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helgesen, Ø. Are Loyal Customers Profitable? Customer Satisfaction, Customer (Action) Loyalty and Customer Profitability at the Individual Level. J. Mark. Manag. 2006, 22, 245–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Predicting and Changing Behavior; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Kessler, E.H. Encyclopedia of Management Theory; SAGE Publications, Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rather, R. Consequences of Consumer Engagement in Service Marketing: An Empirical Exploration. J. Glob. Mark. 2018, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cater, B.; Zabkar, V. Antecedents and consequences of commitment in marketing research services: The client’s perspective. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2009, 38, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Tonder, E.; Petzer, D. The interrelationships between relationship marketing constructs and customer engagement dimensions. Serv. Ind. J. 2018, 38, 948–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodruff, R.B. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1997, 25, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M.D.; Herrmann, A.; Huber, F. The Evolution of Loyalty Intentions. J. Mark. 2006, 70, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, E.W.; Fornell, C.; Lehmann, D.R. Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden. J. Mark. 1994, 58, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreassen, T.W.; Lindestad, B. Customer loyalty and complex services: The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 1998, 9, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beatson, A.; Coote, L.V.; Rudd, J.M. Determining Consumer Satisfaction and Commitment Through Self-Service Technology and Personal Service Usage. J. Mark. Manag. 2006, 22, 853–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Ling, K.; Liu, M. Evaluating Factors Influencing Consumer Satisfaction towards Online Shopping in China. Asian Soc. Sci. 2012, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziaullah, M. E-Loyalty: The influence of product quality and delivery services on e-trust and e-satisfaction in China. Int. J. Adv. Res. Technol. 2014, 3, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
- Houston, R.W.; Taylor, G.K. Consumer Perceptions of CPA WebTrustSM Assurances: Evidence of an Expectation Gap. Int. J. Audit. 1999, 3, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.-J. Determinants of consumers’ purchase behaviour towards green brands. Serv. Ind. J. 2017, 37, 896–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunders, M.N.K.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, 8th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.; Hult, T.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Wang, Q.-C.; Jian, I.Y.; Chi, H.-L.; Yang, D.; Chan, E.H.-W. Are you an energy saver at home? The personality insights of household energy conservation behaviors based on theory of planned behavior. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 174, 105823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qalati, S.A.; Qureshi, N.A.; Ostic, D.; Sulaiman, M.A.B.A. An extension of the theory of planned behavior to understand factors influencing Pakistani households’ energy-saving intentions and behavior: A mediated–moderated model. Energy Effic. 2022, 15, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, F.J.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variable Sand Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutchinson, J.; Lai, F.; Wang, Y. Understanding the relationships of quality, value, equity, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions among golf travelers. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asshidin, N.H.N.; Abidin, N.; Borhan, H.B. Perceived Quality and Emotional Value that Influence Consumer’s Purchase Intention towards American and Local Products. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 35, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Y.; Yin, X.; Xing, G. Impact of Perceived Product Value on Customer-Based Brand Equity: Marx’s Theory–Value-Based Perspective. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 931064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Adly, M.I.; Souiden, N.; Khalid, A. The impact of emotional perceived value on hotel guests’ satisfaction, affective commitment and loyalty. Consum. Behav. Tour. Hosp. 2024, 19, 551–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristic | Classification | Frequencies | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 275 | 40.5% |
Female | 400 | 58.9% | |
Other | 4 | 0.6% | |
Marital status | Married | 422 | 62.2% |
Single | 257 | 37.8% | |
Living area | Hanoi | 225 | 33.1% |
HCM City | 314 | 46.2% | |
Da Nang | 110 | 16.2% | |
Other | 30 | 4.4% | |
Education | K12 | 68 | 10.0% |
Colleague | 111 | 16.3% | |
Bachelor | 340 | 50.1% | |
Postgraduate | 160 | 23.6% | |
Age | Under 23 | 133 | 19.6% |
23–under 30 | 173 | 25.5% | |
30–under 45 | 281 | 41.4% | |
45–under 60 | 83 | 12.2% | |
60 and above | 9 | 1.3% | |
Profession | Public servant | 81 | 11.9% |
Entrepreneur | 59 | 8.7% | |
Manager/Departmental head | 76 | 11.2% | |
Officer/worker in a company | 268 | 39.5% | |
Free worker | 51 | 7.5% | |
Student | 99 | 14.6% | |
Other | 45 | 6.6% | |
Monthly income (million VND) | Under 5 | 124 | 18.3% |
5–under 10 | 156 | 23.0% | |
10–under 35 | 323 | 47.6% | |
35–under 50 | 60 | 8.8% | |
50 and above | 16 | 2.4% | |
Total | 679 | 100.0% |
Construct and Indicators | EFA | PLS-SEM | Mean | Std | CA | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Perceived Quality | 0.908 | 0.942 | 0.844 | ||||
The quality of the green brand is high with respect to environmental concerns | 0.908 | 0.909 | 3.962 | 0.705 | |||
The quality of the green brand is professional with respect to environmental reputation | 0.719 | 0.918 | 3.959 | 0.659 | |||
The quality of the green brand is good with respect to environmental image | 0.924 | 0.930 | 3.943 | 0.721 | |||
Affective Commitment | 0.850 | 0.930 | 0.869 | ||||
I am emotionally attached to the green product | 0.784 | 0.931 | 3.960 | 0.702 | |||
I feel a strong sense of identification with the green product | 0.716 | Elemi-nated | |||||
The environmental friendliness of green products makes me feel good | 0.828 | 0.933 | 3.990 | 0.674 | |||
Green Perceived Value | 0.858 | 0.934 | 0.875 | ||||
The green product’s environmental functions provide good value to me | 0.939 | 0.934 | 3.971 | 0.671 | |||
The green product’s environmental performance meets my expectations | Eliminated | ||||||
I purchase green products because it has more environmental benefits than non-green products | 0.869 | 0.937 | 3.982 | 0.678 | |||
Green Satisfaction | 0.900 | 0.937 | 0.833 | ||||
You are glad about the decision to select the green product because of its environmental image | 0.586 | 0.913 | 3.963 | 0.689 | |||
You think that it is the right decision to purchase the green product because of its environmental functionality | 0.970 | 0.905 | 4.041 | 0.639 | |||
Overall, you are satisfied with the green product because of its environmental performance | 0.763 | 0.920 | 3.993 | 0.668 | |||
Green Loyalty Intention | 0.877 | 0.942 | 0.891 | ||||
I am willing to repurchase the green product because of its (environmental) functions | 0.903 | Eliminated | |||||
I prefer purchasing the green product to other products because of its (environmental) performance | 0.915 | 0.943 | 3.981 | 0.666 | |||
I intend to continue buying the green product because it is (environmentally) friendly | 0.925 | 0.944 | 3.982 | 0.652 | |||
Green Purchase Behavior | 0.857 | 0.933 | 0.875 | ||||
I often buy a product or service from a brand that is environmentally friendly | 0.653 | Eliminated | |||||
When I have a choice between two brands, I often purchase the one less harmful to other people and the environment | 0.837 | 0.933 | 4.050 | 0.643 | |||
I make a special effort to buy environmentally friendly products, e.g., products in biodegradable packages, energy-saving products, etc. | 0.789 | 0.937 | 4.046 | 0.663 |
Affective Commitment | Green Loyalty Intention | Green Per. Qual | Green Per. Value | Green Purchase Behavior | Green Satisfaction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Affective Commitment | 0.932 | |||||
Green Loyalty Intention | 0.767 | 0.944 | ||||
Green Per. Quality | 0.765 | 0.721 | 0.919 | |||
Green Per. Value | 0.739 | 0.715 | 0.764 | 0.936 | ||
Green Purchase Behavior | 0.729 | 0.665 | 0.696 | 0.748 | 0.935 | |
Green Satisfaction | 0.817 | 0.786 | 0.789 | 0.777 | 0.727 | 0.913 |
AFC | GLI | GPV | GPB | GS | Q2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f2 | VIF | f2 | VIF | f2 | VIF | f2 | VIF | f2 | VIF | ||
Affective Commitment (AFC) | 0.074 | 3.503 | 0.264 | 2.429 | 0.614 | ||||||
Green Loyalty Intention (GLI) | 0.062 | 2.429 | 0.600 | ||||||||
Green Per. Quality (GPQ) | 0.071 | 3.126 | 0.013 | 3.348 | 1.403 | 1.000 | 1.649 | 1.000 | 0.000 | ||
Green Per. Value (GPV) | 0.033 | 2.978 | 0.021 | 3.076 | 0.506 | ||||||
Green Purchase Behavior (GPB) | 0.483 | ||||||||||
Green Satisfaction (GS) | 0.254 | 3.282 | 0.091 | 4.116 | 0.514 |
Original Sample | Sample Mean | Standard Deviation | T Statistics | p Values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Affective Commitment -> Green Loyalty Intention | 0.289 | 0.290 | 0.054 | 5.349 | 0.000 |
Affective Commitment -> Green Purchase Behavior | 0.606 | 0.602 | 0.047 | 12.786 | 0.000 |
Green Loyalty Intention -> Green Purchase Behavior | 0.257 | 0.260 | 0.067 | 3.819 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Quality -> Affective Commitment | 0.765 | 0.764 | 0.027 | 28.528 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Quality -> Green Loyalty Intention | 0.721 | 0.719 | 0.033 | 22.009 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Quality -> Green Per. Value | 0.764 | 0.764 | 0.028 | 26.988 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Quality -> Green Purchase Behavior | 0.592 | 0.591 | 0.039 | 15.133 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Quality -> Green Satisfaction | 0.789 | 0.787 | 0.029 | 27.251 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Value -> Affective Commitment | 0.167 | 0.167 | 0.049 | 3.423 | 0.001 |
Green Per. Value -> Green Loyalty Intention | 0.192 | 0.194 | 0.054 | 3.529 | 0.000 |
Green Per. Value -> Green Purchase Behavior | 0.138 | 0.140 | 0.034 | 4.093 | 0.000 |
Green Satisfaction -> Affective Commitment | 0.488 | 0.487 | 0.053 | 9.160 | 0.000 |
Green Satisfaction -> Green Loyalty Intention | 0.487 | 0.491 | 0.072 | 6.725 | 0.000 |
Green Satisfaction -> Green Purchase Behavior | 0.385 | 0.384 | 0.040 | 9.706 | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tran, T.H.H.; Le-Anh, T. An Adaptation of the Quality–Loyalty Model to Study Green Consumer Loyalty. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157144
Tran THH, Le-Anh T. An Adaptation of the Quality–Loyalty Model to Study Green Consumer Loyalty. Sustainability. 2025; 17(15):7144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157144
Chicago/Turabian StyleTran, Thi Hoang Ha, and Tuan Le-Anh. 2025. "An Adaptation of the Quality–Loyalty Model to Study Green Consumer Loyalty" Sustainability 17, no. 15: 7144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157144
APA StyleTran, T. H. H., & Le-Anh, T. (2025). An Adaptation of the Quality–Loyalty Model to Study Green Consumer Loyalty. Sustainability, 17(15), 7144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157144