Next Article in Journal
Examination of the Coordination and Impediments of Rural Socio-Economic-Spatial Coupling in Western Hunan from the Standpoint of Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Enterprise Architecture for Sustainable SME Resilience: Exploring Change Triggers, Adaptive Capabilities, and Financial Performance in Developing Economies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Mechanisms and the Chemical Nature of Soil Organic Matter—A Review

by
Gonzalo Almendros
1,2,* and
José A. González-Pérez
3
1
National Museum of Natural History (MNCN, CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
3
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS-CSIC), 41012 Seville, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6689; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156689
Submission received: 22 May 2025 / Revised: 6 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 22 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Soil Conservation and Sustainability)

Abstract

This article presents a review of several non-exclusive pathways for the sequestration of soil organic carbon, which can be classified into two large classical groups: the modification of plant and microbial macromolecules and the abiotic and microbial neoformation of humic substances. Classical studies have established a causal relationship between aromatic structures and the stability of soil humus (traditional hypotheses regarding lignin and aromatic microbial metabolites as primary precursors for soil organic matter). However, further evidence has emerged that underscores the significance of humification mechanisms based solely on aliphatics. The precursors may be carbohydrates, which may be transformed by the effects of fire or catalytic dehydration reactions in soil. Furthermore, humic-type structures may be formed through the condensation of unsaturated fatty acids or the alteration of aliphatic biomacromolecules, such as cutins, suberins, and non-hydrolysable plant polyesters. In addition to the intrinsic value of understanding the potential for carbon sequestration in diverse soil types, biogeochemical models of the carbon cycle necessitate the assessment of the total quantity, nature, provenance, and resilience of the sequestered organic matter. This emphasises the necessity of applying specific techniques to gain insights into their molecular structures. The application of appropriate analytical techniques to soil organic matter, including sequential chemolysis or thermal degradation combined with isotopic analysis and high-resolution mass spectrometry, derivative spectroscopy (visible and infrared), or 13C magnetic resonance after selective degradation, enables the simultaneous assessment of the concurrent biophysicochemical stabilisation mechanisms of C in soils.

1. Introduction

1.1. Soil Processes and Carbon Sequestration

Carbon sequestration is the process by which carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is captured as accumulated C in soil and biomass, effectively removing it from biogeochemical circulation for extended periods. Carbon in the air is absorbed by photosynthetic plants and incorporated into complex organic macromolecules. Apart from CO2, methane (at approximately 1.9 ppm (v/v)) is the second most notable species [1]. When plants die, their organic remains (leaves, stems, and roots) and microbial biomass undergo decomposition in the soil. A fraction of this C is incorporated as stable soil organic matter through humification processes, contributing to soil C sequestration. The remaining C is primarily released back into the atmosphere as CO2 via mineralisation. Due to the relatively recalcitrant nature of soil C-forms, which may remain in the soil for hundreds to thousands of years, soil C sequestration plays a crucial role in controlling the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere [2,3].
Rough estimations suggest that the world soils represent the largest C reservoir on the planet, storing approximately 1500 to 2000 Pg (1 Pg = petagram = 1015 g) of soil organic C. This pool is more than twice the amount of C stored in living vegetation (around 560 Pg) and exceeds that in the atmosphere (750 Pg) [4,5]. As previously suggested, even small changes in soil C sequestration rates per unit area can significantly influence the global C balance [6]. In this balance, it should also be considered that an additional 800 to 1000 Pg are believed to represent the pool of soil inorganic C (primarily carbonate) [7,8,9,10].
Assuming that proper management practices can enhance soil carbon (C) sequestration, vast degraded and desertified semi-arid areas worldwide offer significant potential for storing atmospheric C [10,11]. This potential should be considered in transnational programs, especially if C storage is included in CO2 credit markets. In this context, efficient and affordable environmental strategies and monitoring tools are essential to ensure effective stabilisation of C in soils. As a result, large-scale soil C sequestration initiatives present valuable scientific, social, and economic opportunities worth exploring [12,13].
The mechanisms responsible for the stabilisation of atmospheric CO2 into biodegradation-resistant organic forms that accumulate in terrestrial ecosystems remain largely unknown. This is primarily because the chemical composition of soil organic matter and the key processes governing its formation are only broadly understood. This is particularly true for the so-called humic substances, which consist of complex, highly transformed macromolecular C-forms that constitute a significant portion of biodegradation-resistant materials in soils and sediments [14].

1.2. On the Variable Effectiveness of Soil C Sequestration

In general, C sequestration does not occur uniformly across all ecosystem compartments, and its efficiency varies depending on the interplay of abiotic (climatic, geologic, and edaphic factors) and biological constraints. Optimal conditions for C sequestration arise only under specific environmental scenarios in which these factors are favorably aligned. For instance, ecosystems with stable climatic conditions, fertile soils, and abundant vegetation tend to exhibit higher rates of sequestration. Conversely, regions with extreme temperatures, poor soil quality, and limited biological activity often show a reduced sequestration potential. This variability underscores the importance of understanding localised environmental conditions when designing strategies to enhance carbon storage [15,16]. Furthermore, the dynamic nature of these factors means that C sequestration is not a static process but one that can fluctuate over time in response to environmental changes, such as shifts in land use, climate patterns, and ecosystem management practices.
The role of soil as a C reservoir is still debated, given the varied results from studies across different climates and geological conditions [17,18]. Beyond climate, factors like vegetation type, soil texture, and mineralogical composition significantly influence the soil’s capacity to store C over the long term. Although agricultural sinks were recognised in the Kyoto Protocol (Article 3.4) [19], their inclusion was limited due to a lack of international consensus on the effectiveness of soil C sequestration during the first reporting period [20,21]. Consequently, the development of the Sink Table was restricted, as agricultural soils were not initially integrated into the agreement. This highlights the need for further research and international cooperation to better understand and harness the role of soil in storing atmospheric C.
Although progress has been made in studying the biogeochemical processes that regulate C sequestration, which is the core focus of this review, socioeconomic, cultural, and political factors that greatly affect its feasibility remain insufficiently explored [22].

1.3. Considerations on the Side-Effects of C Sequestration

Soil C sequestration, particularly in semi-arid and sub-humid regions, can not only offset C emissions but also contribute to restoring C in impoverished and degraded soils. This process provides a sustainable approach to combat land degradation and desertification while simultaneously enhancing agricultural productivity and promoting long-term soil conservation. From an agronomic perspective, the mechanisms driving C sequestration in soil include the humification of organic waste, formation of stable organomineral complexes that enhance soil aggregation, strategic placement of organic matter below the plough layer, promotion of deep-rooting, and calcification. These practices collectively represent environmentally friendly strategies for improving soil health and its resilience.
In summary, the indirect benefits of soil C sequestration are evident in the improvement of soil structural stability, water-holding capacity, nutrient availability, and microbial activity. These characteristics are also linked to the ability of organic matter to regulate the composition of the soil solution, thereby optimizing the uptake of macro- and microelements by plants. Furthermore, the increase in stabilised C, together with the soil mineral fraction, enhances its potential to act as an environmental filter for heavy metals. This includes reducing the leachability and bioavailability of organic and mineral pollutants, such as agrochemicals and heavy metals [23,24,25]. These combined effects underscore the multifaceted role of soil C sequestration in promoting soil health and environmental sustainability
From a biogeochemical perspective, humic substances, unlike unhumified biomass, play a central role in regulating nutrient transport mechanisms essential for sustaining soil life. Their remarkable ability to form complexes of varying stability with both elements and mineral compounds across scales, from free ions to mineral fragments, enables them to mediate the availability of bioelements within ecosystems.
Humic substances function as a dynamic interface between bioavailable and immobilised soil elements, bridging short-term nutrient cycling and long-term geochemical storage, including the formation of organic and inorganic soil minerals. The role of soil organic matter in mineral dynamics is dual: it enhances mineral weathering and contributes to biomineralisation processes. These processes are facilitated by humic-type organic matrices, which influence nucleation, crystal growth, and mineral morphology, resulting in the formation of biominerals such as carbonates, silicates, phosphates, sulfides, sulfates, and oxides [26,27,28].
In contrast, it should also be taken into consideration that, in addition to C, other essential elements, such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), are also sequestered in soil humus formations [29]. Therefore, in forest soils, effective C sequestration may often be associated with the accumulation of raw humus types (e.g., moder and mor), which are typically associated with slow biogeochemical cycling and limited primary productivity. In such humus formations, the interaction between organic matter and the mineral fraction is relatively weak compared to active humus types like mull. As a result, most pedogenic processes in such systems are less influenced by the formation of stable organo-mineral complexes but are instead characterised by the vertical redistribution of organic fractions along the soil profile and the generation of leachates with soluble organic fractions that, in some cases, may have adverse effects on water quality, causing the exportation of plant nutrients from the soil subsystem.
At this point, it is crucial to emphasise that in a global soil management strategy, monitoring the quality of organic matter sequestered in soils may be more significant than focusing solely on its total quantity. For instance, most semi-arid Mediterranean areas exhibit low concentrations of highly transformed soil organic matter but have high resilience to climate change. This stands in contrast to soil formation in subhumid areas, where large amounts of relatively less transformed organic matter are present [29]. In a possible future scenario of climate change with decreased humidity and increased temperature, these subhumid soils could become sources of CO2 emissions due to low soil organic matter humification and the weak association between the organic and mineral fractions [30]. Therefore, the present article aims to highlight soil-specific factors that influence the effectiveness of C sequestration, independent of the variable and often contentious impacts of climate, such as annual fluctuations in temperature and moisture [31]. By focusing on these intrinsic soil properties, we can better understand and optimize C sequestration practices in diverse environments.

1.4. Basic Research on the C Sequestration in Soil

It should not be an oversimplification to consider that the long-term soil C sequestration process is fundamentally linked to the progressive formation of humic substances. These complex macromolecular compounds are ubiquitous and widely distributed in soils, water, and fossil organic deposits, representing the largest reservoir of organic C on the Earth’s surface [7]. Humic substances are composed of intricate structures derived from the alteration of biosynthetic materials, as well as newly formed macromolecules generated both abiotically and biosynthetically.
In addition to the complex functional relationships of humic substances in agroecological processes in soils, the scientific reappraisal of humification processes has acquired renewed interest in research on the environmental impact of the mechanisms involved in the carbon cycle [32]. This area of study is particularly challenging and complex due to the lack of a defined chemical structure for humic substances. Their chemical composition must be inferred using analytical descriptors, such as the extent of different structural domains, the presence of discrete macromolecular regions with selectively preserved entities resembling microbial or plant biomacromolecules, and the diagnostic presence of biomarker compounds with chemotaxonomic value [33,34]. Recent advancements in this field have been facilitated by the development of new analytical and instrumental tools [35,36,37,38,39,40]. Nevertheless, a more comprehensive understanding is required to elucidate the role of soil organic matter in terrestrial ecosystem conservation and productivity.

1.5. Experimental Approaches to Monitor Soil C Sequestration Processes

There is compelling evidence that different simultaneous mechanisms may contribute to C sequestration in soil [41]. These mechanisms include the selective preservation of biomass fractions, diagenesis of biomacromolecules, and humification by neoformation sensu stricto. Neoformation pathways encompass the synthesis of humic-like substances by living organisms, in addition to enzyme-catalysed extracellular reactions in the soil, thereby promoting the condensation of humic acid precursors within the soil environment. This is also the case for humic substances formed via abiotic condensation, both spontaneous and catalysed by mineral oxides or clays. In the most favourable cases, the relative contributions of these mechanisms in different soils can be assessed using specific advanced techniques for molecular characterisation of humic substances. These techniques include the isolation and analysis of free biomarkers or signature compounds [42], selective chemical degradation followed by mass spectrometry, and non-destructive analytical methods such as visible, infrared, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [43,44,45,46].
Despite continuous advances in the chemical characterisation of soil organic matter, extraction remains a persistent limitation. It should be noted that protocols designed to isolate specific fractions, such as humic or fulvic acids, capture only a small proportion of the total soil carbon. Furthermore, these protocols may also introduce selective biases. This has prompted some authors to question whether the extracted humic substances accurately reflect the state of organic matter in situ [47].
Consequently, techniques that enable the study of soil organic matter without prior extraction have become increasingly relevant. Examples of such techniques include analytical pyrolysis and solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy, which can be applied directly to whole soil samples. However, it should be noted that these techniques have several limitations [39]. Even when the most advanced molecular techniques are employed, a combination of techniques is required to produce a comprehensive overview, as each technique highlights different structural features while overlooking others. This is the case for techniques that detect only compounds in a narrow window of molecular weights. In other cases, the major structural units of humic substances may produce weak, overlapping, and non-diagnostic spectroscopic signals [34,37]. However, these limitations are not critical when standardised procedures are consistently applied across samples to ensure reliable comparisons.

1.6. The Soil Organic Matter Constituents: Biomacromolecules and Humic Substances

A portion of the total organic matter in soils, particularly that of recent origin, shows a chemical structure that can be considered analogous to that of individual or macromolecular constituents of the biomass, primarily derived from plant and microbial sources. Some of these organic substances in the soil, such as cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignins, cutins, suberins, and proteins, may undergo some degree of structural modification (diagenetic transformations), including depolymerisation, condensation, changes in the functional group composition, or the incorporation of products derived from microbial metabolism (e.g., lipid or protein). Although these plant constituents are readily metabolised and transformed mostly into CO2 and H2O through the mineralisation process, it is also possible that certain geological and climatic conditions can promote their long-term preservation in soils. In such cases, interactions with other soil constituents may render a significant proportion of these substances resistant to decomposition, allowing them to persist for extended periods [48,49].
In addition to the above-described soil organic constituents with more or less defined structures, the majority of the organic matter stabilised in soils, whether in particulate or colloidal forms, consists of a complex mixture of macromolecular structures based on three-dimensional networks of polyfunctional units, which form a series of structural domains of more or less condensed and chaotic structures [50]. These humic substances typically include aromatic (phenolic, alkylaromatic, and polycyclic) and aliphatic (O-alkyl and alkyl) domains, as well as oxygen-containing functional groups attached to surfaces with varying reactivity [35,51]. However, humic fractions extracted from soils may also contain recognisable biomolecular fragments that are intimately associated with and sometimes covalently bonded to the humic matrix. These fragments cannot be effectively separated [29], which further complicates their characterisation. The establishment of general structural models remains challenging for these substances [52].
Despite their extremely complex chemical structure, humic substances are extensively and widely studied due to their dual significance: they provide valuable information about the characteristics and function of the ecosystems, and they exert a key influence in shaping soil structure and influencing the mobility (and bioavailability) of almost all components—both organic and inorganic—in the soil solution [25,35,53]. In fact, owing to the long residence time of humic substances and the simultaneous occurrence in their structure of constituents derived from a variety of processes and synthetic pathways, the humic macromolecules can be viewed as biogeochemical records of past and present environmental processes in which soil organic matter has been formed. Nevertheless, the average residence time of humic substances remains controversial. It is evident that the data reported by various authors are challenging to compare due to the variability in the origin of the substances in question. It is acknowledged that residence times can vary considerably, ranging from decades to over 2000 years, depending on soil type, molecular size, depth within the soil profile, and environmental conditions [54,55,56].

2. Soil Carbon Stabilization Factors

This section reviews several well-established processes involved in humus formation, as well as more recent hypotheses concerning the origin of stable C forms in soils. The accumulation of stable C forms in soil depends on a variety of factors and processes, many of which involve the chemical composition of organic matter and its interactions with other soil constituents, often with similar efficiency [57]. Among the most relevant factors affecting the retention of C forms in soils, the following are particularly noteworthy (Figure 1).

2.1. Intrinsic Factors

This category encompasses factors related to the chemical nature of soil organic matter constituents and the different organizational levels of their macromolecular structures.

2.1.1. The Resistance of Structural Units

The stability of organic matter chemical components against biological, chemical, and thermal degradation is determined to some extent by the relative abundance of specific structural units, such as aromatic, alkyl, N-, and O-containing groups. In particular, aromatic units have traditionally been considered more recalcitrant to degradation than aliphatic structures (e.g., O-alkyl and alkyl). Among aliphatic units, O-alkyl groups, primarily derived from carbohydrates, are thought to be preferentially used by soil microorganisms. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the structural and functional differences between soil organic matter fractions, particularly in terms of the proportions of their different constituents. These differences can be evidenced in the laboratory using mild degradation techniques, which yield variable amounts of non-degraded residues, or through multi-stage degradation approaches that progressively remove distinct macromolecular domains [58,59,60,61]. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that soils with varying C contents accumulate humic acids with distinct molecular compositions. This has enabled the identification of molecular proxies that correlate with the C sequestration potential of soils under different environmental conditions [62,63,64].

2.1.2. Intramolecular Bridging Factors

The chemical stability of soil organic matter against different types of degradation is closely linked to its degree of structural condensation. This, in turn, may be influenced by factors such as the number of intramacromolecular bridges or the abundance of polyfunctional “building blocks”. This can be illustrated by the differing susceptibility to enzymatic attack displayed by the syringyl- (3,5-dimethoxyphenyl) and guaiacyl- (3-methoxyphenyl)-type plant lignins. Syringyl-type lignins, which possess a higher number of methoxyl groups on their phenolic units, exhibit lower connectivity possibilities between structural units, resulting in reduced resistance to degradation compared to guaiacyl-type lignins [65]. The “potential resistance” of soil organic matter can be evaluated in the laboratory using appropriate techniques, such as selective methods of sequential degradation and approaches designed for the controlled cleavage of specific bond types [66,67,68].

2.1.3. Stability Induced by the Chaotic Structure

Evidence suggests that the high degree of structural heterogeneity in soil organic matter plays a substantial role in its resistance to biodegradation [69]. In the context of the biological evolution scenario, humification is a process that does not provide living organisms with a readily exploitable source of resources for their metabolism. During humification, the structural complexity of humic macromolecules progressively increases, rendering them less recognisable and accessible to microbial enzymes. This is attributed to the chaotic structure and fractal morphology [70] of humic colloids. Furthermore, successive perturbations of ecosystems, combined with a “long term memory” encoded in the humic structure [71,72], have recently been related to stabilisation of C.

2.2. Extrinsic Factors

In addition to climatic and local factors (waterlogging, temperature, topography, etc.), which are not soil-dependent processes and thus will not be described in this review, several extrinsic factors influence soil organic matter stabilisation independently of its chemical composition. Among these soil-related factors, the following can be emphasised [73].

2.2.1. Physical Protection

The importance of organo-mineral interactions in protecting organic matter against biodegradation has been well established since early research [74]. Recent studies have considered that, under certain conditions, this mechanism may be the primary driver of soil organic matter stabilisation and persistence [75,76]. It is widely accepted that microaggregates contain older organic carbon, including a significant proportion of extractable humic substances. In contrast, macroaggregates are primarily composed of younger organic material, predominantly in a particulate form [77].
There has been some debate regarding the extent to which the specific chemical composition of organic matter influences its recalcitrance and, consequently, its long-term storage in soil [78]. However, this should not be a contentious issue, as different processes operate in various soil types and mineral substrates, often occurring simultaneously and non-exclusively. Consequently, it is plausible that organic matter, regardless of its original chemical composition, can become resistant to degradation by being retained by minerals, subsequently acquiring a molecular composition that is characteristic of a higher degree of maturity due to its longer residence time in the soil. Conversely, it is equally plausible that certain biomass constituents and humic substances with specific characteristics—such as a chaotic structure, condensed three-dimensional configuration, high aromaticity, and a predominance of C–C bonds—are inherently resistant to biodegradation. The properties of these humic substances make them more suitable for forming various types of organomineral complexes. This is due to the higher proportion of reactive functional groups, which are capable of forming bridges with minerals. Alternatively, particulate organic matter may progressively fragment into small clay-sized particles (like “microplastics”), in such a way that, despite its initial recalcitrance to biodegradation (i.e., no additional protection required), they are also suitable for incorporation into the organomineral complex and microaggregate fraction.
Indeed, in the context of recently introduced organic matter to soil, a broad spectrum of factors is implicated in the soil microcompartmentation patterns of particulate fractions [79,80]. Soil horizons are constituted of aggregates of varying sizes, which function as their virtual structural units and engender a variety of microenvironments in which chemical and biological reactions proceed at different rates [81,82]. In general, the physical protection of otherwise readily biodegradable organic matter often involves selective preservation processes [48], where organic material is encapsulated within microaggregates, thus hampering the diffusion of microbial enzymes. The physical speciation of humins—humic fractions insoluble in alkaline extractants—is frequently associated with the accumulation patterns of recalcitrant alkyl C [67,83,84]. Recent studies suggest that the increase in sequestered C content in agricultural soils is driven by the accumulation of humins and humic acids, as well as an increase in the proportion of water-stable microaggregates [85].
The influence of carbonates in stabilising both particulate and soluble organic matter forms is also important in calcimorphic soils [74,86]. The additional contribution of soil lipids to the formation of waterproof soil aggregates, which effectively encapsulate organic matter, should not be overlooked [87,88]. Beyond aggregate size and stability, the depth of organic matter placement in the soil profile is a critical factor in determining its stability. Notably, subsoil layers below 1-m depth exhibit the greatest carbon sink capacity [89].

2.2.2. Matrix Interactions Between Organic and Mineral Surfaces

Interactions between organic and mineral colloids [90] enhance the resistance of organic matter to chemical and biological degradation [91,92]. From this viewpoint, there is a series of mineral surfaces that are particularly active. For instance, the stabilising effect of allophanic components on the accumulation of stable organic matter forms in soils developed on volcanic ashes has been well documented [93,94]. Various studies have shown that amorphous gels are among the most important factors contributing to the resistance of organic matter to biodegradation [95,96]. Furthermore, these gels influence the molecular composition of humic acids formed in volcanic soils with different geological substrates [97].
The extent to which colloidal humic substances are insolubilised within the mineral matrix can be evidenced in the laboratory by using strong demineralising treatments, followed by the extraction of the insolubilised organic matter. This protocol reveals the amount of C present in stable complexes with clays and sesquioxides, which is referred to as extractable humins [98].

2.2.3. Microbial Growth Inhibitors

Antimicrobial compounds (e.g., terpenes and fungal antibiotics) and enzyme inhibitors (e.g., certain phenols) released by plants or microorganisms can play a very effective role in controlling C recycling rates [99,100,101]. The accumulation of thick humiferous horizons under pine forests or ericaceous shrubs in temperate climates is often attributed to specific phenolic compounds [102] and diterpene structures released by the vegetation [42]. The biomass (wood and leaves) of several Mediterranean species also contains specific essential oils with allelopathic functions in living plants. These compounds remain active in the soil, leading to the non-selective preservation of many plant biomacromolecular constituents.

3. The Formation Processes of Humic Substances

Humic substances, comprising humic acids, fulvic acids, and humins, are widely regarded as the most characteristic organic fractions in soil [103]. These substances exhibit diverse molecular structures that vary across different soil types, reflecting the nature of the original material, the intensity of biogeochemical processes, and the effects of various environmental impacts on the ecosystem. Consequently, understanding the humification process is of paramount importance for both soil health and C sequestration mechanisms [104,105]. Among the processes contributing to the retention of organic matter in soil, the following section will focus on the mechanisms of humification sensu stricto—a series of non-exclusive pathways which have been postulated for the genesis of humic substances [106].
In principle, all biomass constituents can form humic substances, albeit through different mechanisms, which are summarised in the following sections. Some biomass constituents, such as lignins and aliphatic polymers (including cutins and suberins) found in plants, are intrinsically resistant to biodegradation. These constituents are progressively altered in the soil while retaining their primary skeletal structures. These constituents soon incorporate new functional groups, including oxygen-containing groups, alkyl groups, and nitrogen compounds.
Conversely, other constituents that are more easily biodegraded, such as proteins and many carbohydrates, are not considered macromolecular precursors of humic substances. Instead, they must first be biodegraded into their simplest units, which are then condensed through enzymatic or abiotic processes. Alternatively, they can be incorporated alongside the altered biomacromolecules mentioned above, thereby increasing molecular diversity and structural disorganisation (Figure 1).

3.1. Stabilization Mechanisms Involving Alteration of Pre-Existing Macromolecular Material (Inherited Organic Fractions) Not Requiring Complete Previous Degradation of the Starting Material

The accumulation of transformed particulate organic matter fractions (e.g., diagenetically altered macromolecules) contributes to the formation of particulate stable soil fractions, such as inherited humins [74]. These modifications are characteristic of humus types with low to moderate biological activity and primarily involve the selective preservation of plant-derived biomacromolecules (e.g., lignins). Over time, these compounds undergo progressive denaturalization involving a series of relatively simple reactions such as demethoxylation, carboxylation, incorporation of lipid and N-containing materials (likely of microbial origin), etc. [107,108]. These processes predominantly affect relatively recalcitrant plant and microbial biomacromolecules (such as lignins, cutins, and suberins), enhancing their resistance to microbial degradation and promoting long-term stabilisation in soils.
Microbial reworking, or structural reorganisation caused by microorganisms, is a crucial source of organic matter that is significantly more stable than the original material. This increase in the molecular complexity of lignin is often accompanied by the incorporation of nitrogen-containing products and alkyl structures [109]. These structures may originate from microbial metabolism during organic matter decomposition or from the inclusion of lipid compounds derived from higher plants.
In this section, it is also worth referring to the microbial processes that modify several imperfectly known aliphatic biomacromolecules, sometimes called lipid polymers. This is the case for biopolyesters, cutans, suberans, botryococcans, polyditerpenes, and recalcitrant biomacromolecules from vascular plants with unknown structures, likely “hybrid” substances containing lipid and carbohydrate domains [110,111]. Despite some of these substances being composed of cross-linked hydroxyfatty acid networks associated through ester bonds [112,113], their resistance to biodegradation is generally much higher than that expected from the labile nature of ester bonds, as indicated below. The presence of non-hydrolysable amides and non-hydrolysable esters is a characteristic feature often observed in complex, native, or transformed condensed three-dimensional networks in humic fractions with significant variability in structural units. In fact, non-destructive techniques (IR and NMR spectroscopies) indicate the existence of structures (e.g., sugars and fatty acids), which could a priori be considered easily removable by standard wet chemical methods; nevertheless, similar structures and bond types remain in the non-hydrolysed residue. It has been suggested that this stability may reflect the occurrence of steric impediments in organic matrices, molecular encapsulation, solid solution mechanisms, etc. [114].
Therefore, the importance of aliphatic precursors in the formation processes of humic substances [115] is currently considered highly significant even in terrestrial soils, whereas classical studies have emphasised their importance only in the case of hydromorphic soils, which are traditionally known to be especially favourable for the selective preservation of aliphatic constituents (mainly protein and carbohydrate). In this sense, the comprehensive book by Stevenson [35] frequently refers to the fact that the resistance of lignin to microbial attack may have been overemphasised in classical literature, mainly based on the pioneering studies by Waksman [116] on peat soils. However, further studies have demonstrated that the enzymatic degradation of lignin [117] may occur at a rate similar to that of other leaf constituents [78,118,119]. Consequently, humification should not be regarded as a concentration of any specific constituent of plant biomass, which aligns with the fact that organic matter transformed into humic substances and associated with a mineral matrix is more resistant to decomposition than the original plant-derived material [103].

3.2. Neoformation Processes Based on the Condensation of Low Molecular Weight Precursors, or Structures Not Present in the Starting Material Derived Either from the Cleavage of Biomacromolecules or from Biological Synthesis

3.2.1. Biosynthetic Formation of Humic-like Substances

Microbial synthesis plays a relevant role in the accumulation of biodegradation-resistant black substances in soil [14]. The importance of the so-called fungal melanins was first highlighted in pioneering studies by Martin and Haider [120] and later reviewed by Bell and Wheeler [121]. In general, these melanins provide fungi with adaptive advantages, such as resistance to desiccation, solar irradiation, and enzymatic attack [122]. Over time, fungal melanins tend to accumulate in the soil, whereas other fungal constituents (e.g., chitin and proteins) are preferentially biodegraded.
Numerous studies—both classical, using 13C NMR [123] and more recent—have consistently demonstrated structural similarities between melanins and soil humic acids, regardless of the analytical techniques used [124,125,126].
In some cases, melanin is formed through well-defined biosynthetic pathways, such as those involving the condensation of binaphthyl derivatives. Certain fungi (e.g., Cenococcum, Alternaria, Aureobasidion, Ulocladium, and Hypoxylon) [127,128,129,130] produce a typical chromophor compound as a secondary metabolite, which appears green in dilute alkaline solutions. Therefore, these melanins can be readily identified using derivative spectroscopy in the visible range due to the presence of a 4,9-dihydroxyperylene-3,10-quinone unit [131,132,133], which exhibits distinct and well-defined absorption peaks at 455, 530, 570, and 620 nm [134].
Beyond their role as biomarkers for fungal contributions to stable soil organic matter [135], quinoid melanins may also influence soil properties. They tend to form highly stable mineral complexes [136] and exhibit greater resistance to biodegradation than humic substances derived from other humus-formation processes [137].

3.2.2. Extracellular Biochemical Processes

A large variety of reactive organic compounds from plants and microorganisms are released into the soil solution, where they coexist briefly before undergoing biodegradation or condensing into macromolecular structures. This spontaneous secondary synthesis, driven by abiotic and enzymatically catalysed reactions involving organic residues and their oxidative decomposition products, aligns with classical descriptions of humification [138]. For instance, such processes may involve the enzymatic condensation of products released after the biodegradation of lignin and other biomacromolecules [139].
Enzymatic browning, extensively studied in food technology, likely parallels soil reactions, where clays and colloidal oxides further catalyse condensation. Cell autolysis, triggered by the merging of lysosomal and vacuolar contents during secondary metabolism prior to cell death, also contributes to uncontrolled reactions, leading to free-radical-containing macromolecular material [140,141]. Continuous inputs from leaf leachates (abundant in some tropical soils) and root exudates provide reactive compounds that readily condense via soil enzymatic activity [142].

3.2.3. Abiotic Synthesis of Humic-like Substances from Aromatic or Aliphatic Precursors

Humification processes in the absence of microorganisms have mainly been demonstrated in model systems. Laboratory experiments have indicated that aging concentrated mixtures of reactive compounds, such as phenols or amino acids, produces brown-coloured condensation products. Over time, these products increase in molecular size through continuous incorporation of soluble units. For example, catechol-glycine-type substances form spontaneously within days under dark conditions at room temperature [143]. These classical reactions are greatly favoured by the presence of oxygen and metal oxides, particularly MnO2 (birnessite, δ-MnO2), which catalyzes the synthesis of humic acids from phenolic precursors [144].
Indeed, recent studies have exploited the catalytic role of metal oxides for their potential to accelerate the formation of humic-type substances in compost [145]. In general, several studies have shown that these reactions are greatly favoured by the presence of oxides, mainly MnO2, Fe2O3, or Al2O3, as well as 2:1-layered clays [146].
A key challenge in composting lignocellulosic waste is the scarcity of a predominant mineral substrate, such as soil, despite the presence of nearly all the necessary components for humic substance formation. Consequently, even prolonged composting periods often fail to produce substances that are structurally similar to the humic acids found in soils. Instead, the resulting fractions typically exhibit the characteristics of oxidised lignoproteins [107,108]. However, despite these limitations, it is evident that the occurrence of thermophilic conditions during the composting process, which do not occur in natural soils, in conjunction with the addition of MnO2, results in a decrease in NH4+ losses and an acceleration of lignin degradation, promoting the recombination of breakdown products. This process facilitates the formation of humic-like substances with a structure resembling those found in soil [147].
Similarly, humic-type substances can form through abiotic pathways, such as the condensation of catechol with acetic acid at 25 °C [148]. Additionally, inorganic forms of nitrogen can be transformed into organic forms when combined with phenolic compounds in concentrated solutions, even in the absence of biological activity [149].
In contrast, short-chain water-soluble aliphatic compounds, particularly those containing unsaturated bonds, can undergo condensation to form resins or humic-like disordered substances that closely resemble soil fulvic acids. This phenomenon has been described in model products of the polymaleic acid type [150,151]. When the molecular complexity of such condensation products increases, so does their hydrophobicity. Consequently, long-chain compounds, such as fatty acids and alkanes, can be successfully entrapped into microporous, macromolecular networks or associated with surfaces through hydrophobic bonding. This could represent an alternative formation pathway that explains the presence of alkyl domains in humic substances [66,152,153].

3.2.4. Synthesis of Maillard’s Products

The condensation of amino acids and carbohydrates has long been studied in the context of the transformations occurring during food cooking [154,155]. These products, first described by Maillard [156] and generically referred to as melanoidins, are formed via a series of successive reactions at relatively high temperatures (typically > 80 °C) [157]. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that analogous reactions may occur over extended timescales in soils where organic matter is preserved from rapid biodegradation due to waterlogging, oligotrophic conditions, or the presence of antiseptic compounds.
Maillard’s reactions have often been invoked to explain the formation of aquatic humic substances in hydromorphic soils or dissolved organic matter [158]. However, numerous studies have shown that mineral surfaces, particularly clays and iron oxides, act as catalysts, accelerating melanoidin formation [159]. For instance, in more complex systems containing MnO2 and catechol, Maillard darkening reactions are markedly enhanced, yielding humic-and fulvic-acid-like substances [160]. These findings suggest an interplay between the polyphenol and Maillard pathways, facilitated by MnO2 under conditions representative of diverse soil environments [161]. Recent research supports the polyphenol-Maillard reaction [162]. While classical Maillard reactions require elevated temperatures (uncommon in soils), mineral phases such as gibbsite may lower the energy barriers, enabling these processes under ambient conditions.
Notably, several features are shared by Maillard products and macromolecular compounds formed abiotically through carbohydrate dehydration in nitrogen-deficient media (pseudomelanoidins). While N-containing compounds accelerate reaction rates and reduce the temperature required for condensation, simple sugars can also be transformed into a variety of reactive intermediates, including anhydrosugar derivatives (e.g., levoglucosenone), furans, and even benzenic compounds [163]. These reactions resemble the typical caramelisation or charring of carbohydrates [164,165] and may also occur in other oxygen-rich molecular systems [166], proceeding in both solution and solid-state environments [167,168].
Such humification pathways, driven primarily by typical carbohydrate reactions but facilitated by mineral catalysts and co-occurring reactive soil compounds, are most likely to occur in specific environmental settings. These include peatlands (where acid-catalysed carbohydrate dehydration dominates) and soils exposed to high temperatures, such as those during wildfires or controlled burns [169,170]. In extreme cases, like fire-affected soils, these processes yield charred organic particles and ultimately contribute to the formation of “black carbon” [171]. This topic is discussed in the following subsection.

3.2.5. Fire-Mediated Production of Pyogenic Organic Matter and Its Evolution into Humic-like Substances

The role of particulate carbon (C) forms in soil properties and C sequestration remains a topic of debate. For instance, black carbon (BC) has been widely regarded as highly recalcitrant, suggesting that historical fire practices (e.g., controlled burning of crop residues) could contribute to long-term C storage with greater residence times than humus formed through non-pyrogenic processes. However, studies have demonstrated significant biodegradation of these C forms in tropical soils, which challenges this assumption [172,173].
A major obstacle in assessing the environmental role of BC lies in accurately quantifying its concentration in soil. Current methods, such as wet chemical oxidation, are prone to substantial biases [6,174]. Furthermore, reliable surrogate indicators for charred materials are scarce. Although benzenecarboxylic acids produced during the oxidative degradation of soil organic matter have been proposed as markers of fire impact [175], their validity is limited. These acids can also form during the degradation of unburned lignin, and their yields vary with the experimental conditions (e.g., temperature) [176].
Despite these uncertainties, evidence consistently shows that fire enhances the stability of soil organic C against thermal, chemical, and biological degradation under natural and controlled heating conditions in the laboratory [177]. Controlled laboratory incubations have revealed reduced mineralisation rates (CO2 release per unit of soil C) in heated soils. Nevertheless, no single descriptor can fully capture the impact of fire on organic matter, as discussed below.
Fire-induced stabilisation of soil organic matter is characterised by decarboxylation, demethoxylation, reduced colloidal properties, heterocyclic N-forms, and increased aromaticity. These changes result not only from the selective degradation of aliphatic moieties in humic substances but also from the thermal condensation of newly formed cyclic and polycyclic structures [178]. A notable consequence of soil heating is the accumulation of heterocyclic nitrogen compounds, which are typically absent in unburned soils [179]. These thermal transformations are accompanied by quantitative shifts in carbon fractions, conversion of soluble fractions and fulvic acids into humic acid-like substances, further transformation of humic acids into humin, and eventual conversion of humin into black carbon [177]. In addition, fire induces soil water repellency, which can significantly alter physical and microbiological soil processes [180,181,182,183].
The role of black carbon (derived from carbohydrates, nitrogenous compounds, and lignins) in humic acid formation has been widely studied. Early research on dark volcanic soils in Japan suggested that charred residues of Miscanthus sinensis (Japanese pampas grass) substantially contribute to humic acid formation [184]. Subsequent studies have explored BC as a key component of the aromatic domain in humic acids [185] and references therein.
However, given the transformative effects of fire on organic matter, it is unlikely that BC integrates directly into humic acids without oxidation and functional group incorporation. This also applies to biochar, which is often used as a soil amendment. Instead, pyrogenic carbon is more likely to be incorporated into the humin fraction due to thermal alteration, which removes oxygen-containing functional groups, increases hydrophobicity [186], reduces solubility, and promotes the conversion of fulvic acids to humic acids and, ultimately, to humins. Notably, these humins contain most of the pyrogenic carbon, which remains insoluble across all pH levels.

3.2.6. Abiotic Condensations of Long-Chain Alkyl Compounds

The reliability of abiotic condensation involving unsaturated lipids, leading to the formation of macromolecular materials not only in dissolved organic matter (e.g., marine humic acids [187]) but also in terrestrial soils, has gained increasing recognition in recent years. The traditional view that alkyl molecules act as “peripheral constituents” of humic macromolecules, which are presumed to possess an “aromatic core”, largely stems from indirect evidence. For instance, the preferential release of aliphatic compounds during mild laboratory degradation experiments [58] has been cited to support this model. However, alternative pathways merit further consideration. While free fatty acids and glycerides are often assumed to be rapidly metabolised in incubation experiments (as evidenced by their swift disappearance from solvent-extractable pools), this observation does not solely reflect their biodegradation. Although microbial consumption accounts for much of the alkyl material, unsaturated lipids can also undergo rapid condensation reactions, yielding polyalkyl networks via mid-chain bridging, followed by cyclohexane formation and even aromatic rings [188]. Such abiotic processes are particularly relevant in environments where lignin-derived precursors are scarce, such as marine systems. For example, photo-oxidation has been proposed as the primary humification mechanism for plankton-derived organic matter in open sea environments [189].
In terrestrial systems, the presence of oxides, clays, and other mineral catalysts significantly accelerates the condensation of unsaturated fatty acid chains, especially when these acids remain esterified as triglycerides. Consequently, the rapid decline in solvent-extractable fatty acids during soil incubation may reflect not only microbial degradation but also their incorporation into stable, non-extractable polyalkyl structures [42].
It has been hypothesised that mechanisms of humification, based on precursors derived from alkyl compounds, such as waxes, cutins, suberins, and microbial biopolymers, may be more relevant in the case of certain humin fractions described as predominantly aliphatic [114,190] than in humic acids. Polyalkyl structures are not particularly susceptible to supporting a large number of hydrophilic oxygen-containing functional groups that confer characteristic solubility properties to humic acids. Considering that these aliphatic acids could also condense with pre-existing humic substances after a previous weak association through hydrophobic interactions, we consider that the role of non-aromatic humic precursors should be emphasised in most soil types under a variety of bioclimatic conditions.

4. Concluding Remarks

The processes that govern carbon storage in the soil are highly complex and interrelated, making it difficult to establish the specific contribution of each mechanism (inheritance, neoformation, etc.).
When defining “sequestered soil organic carbon”, it is essential to emphasise the importance of organic matter quality or maturity, which is understood as the degree to which the molecular structure of soil organic matter diverges from that of the original biomass compounds. This quality dimension often outweighs the total C quantity, as it determines the long-term stability of C under future environmental changes.
Several studies have highlighted that carbon sequestration through humification is a complex process that varies across ecosystems. While aromatic compounds from lignin and microbial activity are often key to forming mature humic substances, humification can also occur from aliphatic precursors like sugars and lipids, especially where biodegradation is limited, such as in waterlogged or fire-affected environments.
Similarly, although organo-mineral interactions are widely regarded as essential for organic matter stabilisation, they may play a minimal role in ecosystems such as peatlands or mor-type forest humus, where clay-humus complexes are absent. Nevertheless, these systems are the most effective terrestrial C sinks, due to the transformation of biomacromolecules into highly recalcitrant organic matter.
All extant evidence points to the diverse sequestration mechanisms functioning concurrently, rather than exclusively. The sequestration of carbon in soil should be regarded as a multitude of scale-dependent processes inherent to distinct soil types. This perspective would facilitate the comprehension of biogeochemical processes and recommended ecosystem management practices.

Author Contributions

G.A. and J.A.G.-P.: conceptualisation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support from the European Union (EJP SOIL SANCHOSTHIRST Grant agreement N.862695.INCO-DC, PL-972698) is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lan, X.; Thoning, K.W.; Dlugokencky, E.J. Trends in Globally-Averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 Determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory Measurements. Version 2025-06. Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends_doi.html (accessed on 27 June 2025).
  2. Batjes, N.H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1996, 47, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rodrigues, C.I.D.; Brito, L.M.; Nunes, L.J.R. Soil carbon sequestration in the context of climate change mitigation: A review. Soil Syst. 2023, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Post, W.M.; Emmanuel, W.R.; Zinke, P.J.; Stangenberger, A.G. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 1982, 298, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eswaran, H.; Van Den Berg, E.; Reich, P. Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993, 57, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gerke, J. The central role of soil organic matter in soil fertility and carbon storage. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schnitzer, M. Some observations on the chemistry of humic substances. Agrochimica 1978, 22, 216–225. [Google Scholar]
  8. Buringh, P. Organic carbon in soils of the world. In The Role of Terrestrial Vegetation in the Global Carbon Cycle: Measurement by Remote Sensing; Woodwell, G.M., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eswaran, H.; Van den Berg, P.; Reich, P.; Kimble, J. Global soil carbon resources. In Soils and Global Change; Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Levine, E., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; CRC/Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar]
  10. Batjes, N.H.; Sombroek, W.G. Possibilities for carbon sequestration in tropical and subtropical soils. Global Change Biol. 1997, 3, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Glenn, E.; Squires, V.; Olsen, M.; Frye, R. Potential for carbon sequestration in the drylands. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1993, 70, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hall, D.O. Carbon flows in the biosphere: Present and future. J. Geogr. Soc. 1989, 146, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Batjes, N.H. Mitigation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations by increased carbon sequestration in the soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1998, 27, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schaeffer, A.; Nannipieri, P.; Kästner, M.; Schmidt, B.; Botterweck, J. From humic substances to soil organic matter–microbial contributions. In honour of Konrad Haider and James P. Martin for their outstanding research contribution to soil science. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1865–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Post, W.M.; King, A.W.; Wullschleger, S.D. Soil organic matter models and global estimates of soil organic carbon. In Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models; NATO ASI Series (ASII); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Volume 38, pp. 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rodríguez Murillo, J.C. Organic carbon content under different types of land use and soil in Peninsular Spain. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2001, 33, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hontoria, C.; Rodríguez-Murillo, J.C. Relationships between soil organic carbon and site characteristics in Peninsular Spain. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, 63, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gartzia-Bengoetxea, N.; Virto, I.; Arias-González, A.; Enrique, A.; Fernández-Ugalde, O.; Barré, P. Mineral control of organic carbon storage in acid temperate forest soils in the Basque Country. Geoderma 2020, 358, 113998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. United Nations. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; United Nations: Kyoto, Japan, 1997; Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-kyoto-protocol/history-of-the-kyoto-protocol/text-of-the-kyoto-protocol (accessed on 27 June 2025).
  20. Duxbury, J.M. The significance of greenhouse emissions from soils of tropical agroecosystems. In Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect; Lal, R., Kimble, J., Levine, E., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 279–292. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fisher, M.J.; Rao, I.M.; Lascano, C.E.K.; Sanz, J.I.; Thomas, R.J.K.; Vera, R.R.; Ayarza, M.A. Pasture soils as carbon sink. Nature 1995, 376, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Devevre, O.C.; Horwath, W.R. Carbon sequestration into soil organic matter under organic–based management. In Proceedings of the 10th International Meeting of the International Humic Substances Society (IHSS10), Tolouse, France, 24–28 July 2000; pp. 707–711. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khan, S.U.; Schnitzer, M. The retention of hydrophobic organic compounds by humic acid. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1972, 36, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hargitai, L. The role of humus status of soils in binding toxic elements and compounds. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 81–82, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Almendros, G. Sorptive interactions of pesticides in soils treated with modified humic acids. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1995, 46, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maffia, A.; Oliva, M.; Marra, F.; Mallamaci, C.; Nardi, S.; Muscolo, A. Humic substances: Bridging ecology and agriculture for a greener future. Agronomy 2025, 15, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kröger, N.; Brunner, E.; Estroff, L.; Marin, F. The role of organic matrices in biomineralization. Discov. Mater. 2021, 1, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mujuru, L.; Gotora, T.; Velthorst, E.J.; Nyamangara, J.; Hoosbeek, M.R. Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration over an age sequence of Pinus patula plantations in Zimbabwean eastern highlands. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2014, 313, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Almendros, G. Carbon Sequestration in Soil. In Kluwer Encyclopedia of Soil Science; Chesworth, W., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 315–323. ISBN 978-1-4020-3994-2. [Google Scholar]
  30. Goudriaan, J. Global Carbon Cycle and Carbon Sequestration. In Carbon Sequestration in the Biosphere; Beran, M.A., Ed.; NATO ASI Series I: Global Environmental Change; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; Volume 33, pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fang, C.; Smith, P.; Moncrieff, J.B.; Smith, J.U. Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature 1995, 433, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiao, C. Soil Organic Carbon Storage (Sequestration) Principles and Management. In Potential Role for Recycled Organic Materials in Agricultural Soils of Washington State; Waste 2 Resources Program, Washington State Department of Ecology: Olympia, WA, USA, 2015; 90p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Olk, D.C.; Bloom, P.R.; De Nobili, M.; Chen, Y.; McKnight, D.M.; Wells, M.J.M.; Weber, J. Using humic fractions to understand natural organic matter processes in soil and water: Selected studies and applications. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 1633–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Myneni, S.C. Chemistry of natural organic matter—The next step: Commentary on a humic substances debate. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stevenson, F.J. Biochemistry of the formation of humic substances. In Humus Chemistry; Stevenson, F.J., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1892; pp. 195–220. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sutton, R.; Sposito, G. Molecular Structure in Soil Humic Substances: The New View. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 9009–9015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Almendros, G. Humic Substances. In Kluwer Encyclopedia of Soil Science; Chesworth, W., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 97–99. ISBN 978-1-4020-3994-2. [Google Scholar]
  38. Almendros, G.; Tinoco, M.P.; De la Rosa, J.M.; Knicker, H.; González-Pérez, J.A.; González-Vila, F.J. Selective effects of forest fires on the structural domains of soil humic acids as shown by dipolar dephasing 13C NMR and graphical-statistical analysis of pyrolysis compounds. J. Soil Sediments 2018, 18, 1303–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kögel-Knabner, I.; Rumpel, C. Advances in molecular approaches for understanding soil organic matter composition, origin, and turnover: A historical overview. Adv. Agron. 2018, 149, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tinoco, P.; Almendros, G.; González-Vila, F.J.; Sanz, J.; González-Pérez, J.A. Revisiting molecular characteristics responsive for the aromaticity of soil humic acids. J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Falloon, P.D.; Smith, P. Modelling refractory soil organic matter. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2000, 30, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Almendros, G.; Sanz, J.; Velasco, F. Signature of lipid assemblages in soils under continental Mediterranean forests. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1996, 47, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wilson, M.A. Application of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to the study of the structure of soil organic matter. J. Soil Sci. 1981, 32, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. González-Vila, F.J.; Lüdemann, H.-D.; Martín, F. 13C-NMR structural features of soil humic acids and their methylated, hydrolyzed and extracted derivatives. Geoderma 1983, 31, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Almendros, G.; Guadalix, M.E.; González-Vila, F.J.; Martin, F. Preservation of aliphatic macromolecules in soil humins. Org. Geochem. 1996, 24, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Preston, C.M.; Ripmeester, J.A. Application of solution and solid-state 13C NMR to four organic soils, their humic acids, fulvic acids, humins and hydrolysis residues. Can. J. Spectrosc. 1982, 27, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lehmann, J.; Kleber, M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 2015, 528, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Eglinton, G.; Logan, G.A. Molecular preservation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1991, 333, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hempfling, R.; Schulten, H.R. Selective preservation of biomolecules during humification of forest litter studied by pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 81, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stevenson, F.J. Structural Basis of Humic Substances. In Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1994; p. 337. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wershaw, R.L.; Pinckney, D.J.; Booker, S.E. Chemical structure of humic acids– Part 1. A generalized structural model. J. Res. US Geol. Surv. 1977, 5, 565–569. [Google Scholar]
  52. Orsi, M. Molecular dynamics simulation of humic substances. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2014, 1, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. De Nobili, M. Comment on “Humic Substances Extracted by Alkali Are Invalid Proxies for the Dynamics and Functions of Organic Matter in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems,” by Kleber and Lehmann (2019). J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 787–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, M.C.; Chang, S.H. Mean residence times and characteristics of humic substances extracted from a Taiwan soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2001, 81, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Piccolo, A.; Drosos, M. The essential role of humified organic matter in preserving soil health. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2025, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ukalska-Jaruga, A.; Bejger, R.; Debaene, G.; Smreczak, B. Characterization of soil organic matter Individual fractions (fulvic acids, humic acids, and humins) by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques in agricultural soils. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Goh, K.M. Carbon sequestration and stabilization in soils: Implications for soil productivity and climate change. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Haworth, R.D. The chemical nature of humic acid. Soil Sci. 1971, 111, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Martín, F.; Saíz-Jiménez, C.; González-Vila, F.J. The persulfate oxidation of a soil humic acid. Soil Sci. 1981, 132, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Almendros, G.; Sanz, J. Compounds released from humic acids upon BF3-MeOH transesterification. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 81–82, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Almendros, G.; Sanz, J. A structural study of alkyl polymers in soil after perborate degradation of humin. Geoderma 1992, 53, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Almendros, G.; Hernández, Z.; Sanz, J.; Jiménez-González, M.A.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, S.; González-Pérez, J.A. Graphical statistical approach to soil organic matter resilience using analytical pyrolysis data. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1533, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jiménez-González, M.A.; Almendros, G.; Waggoner, D.C.; Álvarez, A.M.; Hatcher, P.G. Assessment of the molecular composition of humic acid as an indicator of soil carbon levels by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometric analysis. Org. Geochem. 2020, 143, 104012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jiménez-González, M.A.; Álvarez, A.; Carral, P.; Almendros, G. Chemometric assessment of soil organic matter storage and quality from humic acid infrared spectra. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 685, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hatakka, A.; Hammel, K.E. Fungal Biodegradation of Lignocelluloses. In The Mycota X: Industrial Applications, 2nd ed.; Hofrichter, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 319–340. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-11458-8_15 (accessed on 14 July 2025).
  66. Almendros, G.; González-Vila, F.J. Degradative studies on a soil humin fraction. Sequential degradation of inherited humin. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1987, 19, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Almendros, G.; Sanz, J. A structural study on the soil humin fraction—Boron trifluoride-methanol transesterification of soil humin preparations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1991, 23, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Almendros, G.; Guadalix, M.E.; González-Vila, F.J.; Martín, F. Distribution of structural units in humic substances as revealed by multi–step selective degradations and 13C–NMR of successive residues. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Almendros, G.; Dorado, J. Molecular characteristics related to the biodegradability of humic acid preparations. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1999, 50, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tombácz, E.; Rice, J.; Ren, Z. Fractal structure of polydisperse humic acid particles in solution studied by scattering methods. Models Chem. 1997, 134, 877–888. [Google Scholar]
  71. Saiz-Jimenez, C.; De Leeuw, J.W. Chemical characterization of soil organic matter fractions by analytical pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1986, 9, 99–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rahmonov, O.; Kowalski, W.J.; Bednarek, R. Characterization of the soil organic matter and plant tissues in an initial stage of the plant succession and soil development by means of Curie-point pyrolysis coupled with GC-MS. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2010, 43, 1557–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pandao, M.R.; Rathod, S.R.; Sirsat, D.D.; Lingayat, N.R. The role of soil in carbon sequestration: Mechanisms and implications. Asian J. Environ. Ecol. 2024, 23, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Duchaufour, P.; Jacquin, F. Comparaison des procesus d’humification dans les principaux types d’humus forestiers. Sci. Sol. 1975, 1, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  75. Schmidt, M.W.; Torn, M.S.; Abiven, S.; Dittmar, T.; Guggenberger, G.; Janssens, I.A.; Kleber, M.; Kögel-Knabner, I.; Lehmann, J.; Manning, D.A.C.; et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 2011, 478, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Basile-Doelsch, I.; Balesdent, J.; Pellerin, S. Reviews and syntheses: The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil. Biogeosciences 2020, 17, 5223–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Blanco-Canqui, H.; Lal, R. Mechanisms of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2004, 23, 481–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Derrien, D.; Barré, P.; Basile-Doelsch, I.; Cécillon, L.; Chabbi, A.; Crème, A.; Fontaine, S.; Henneron, L.; Janot, N.; Lashermes, G.; et al. Current controversies on mechanisms controlling soil carbon storage: Implications for interactions with practitioners and policy-makers. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 43, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Oades, J.M. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 1988, 5, 35–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Skjemstad, J.O.; Clarke, P.; Taylor, J.A.; Oades, J.M.; McClure, S.G. The chemistry and nature of protected carbon in soil. Aust. J. Soil Res. 1996, 34, 251–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ladd, J.N.; Foster, R.C.; Skjemstad, J.O. Soil structure: Carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Geoderma 1993, 56, 401–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Golchin, A.; Oades, J.M.; Skjemstad, J.O.; Clarke, P. Soil structure and carbon cycling. Aust. J. Soil Res. 1994, 32, 1043–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oades, J.M.; Vassallo, A.M.; Waters, A.G.; Wilson, A. Characterization of organic matter in particle size and density fractions from a Red–brown Earth by solid–state 13C NMR. Aust. J. Soil Res. 1987, 25, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Schulten, H.-R.; Schnitzer, M. Aliphatics in soil organic matter in fine-clay fractions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1990, 54, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Song, X.; Yuan, Z.-Q.; Fang, C.; Hu, Z.-H.; Li, F.-M.; Sardans, J.; Penuelas, J. The formation of humic acid and micro-aggregates facilitated long-time soil organic carbon sequestration after Medicago sativa L. introduction on abandoned farmlands. Geoderma 2024, 445, 116889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bottner, P.; Couteaux, M.M.; Vallejo, V.R. Soil organic matter in Mediterranean-type ecosystems and global climatic changes: A case study—The soils of the Mediterranean basin. In Global Change and Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems; Moreno, J.M., Oechel, W.C., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 306–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Spaccini, R.; Conte, P.; Piccolo, A.; Haberhauer, G.; Gerzabek, M.H. Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. In Proceedings of the 10th International Meeting of the International Humic Substances Society (IHSS10), Tolouse, France, 24–28 July 2000; p. 419. [Google Scholar]
  88. Spaccini, R.; Piccolo, A.; Conte, P.; Haberhauer, G.; Gerzabek, M.H. Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 1839–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lal, R. Soil carbon management and climate change. Carbon Manag. 2013, 4, 439–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Greenland, D.J. Interactions between humic and fulvic acids and clays. Soil Sci. 1971, 111, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Calvo de Anta, R.M.; Díaz-Fierros, F. Mineralización del carbono y del nitrógeno en suelos forestales de Galicia. An. Edafol. Agrobiol. 1982, 41, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  92. Deuel, H. Interactions between inorganic and organic soil constituents. Trans. 7th Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 1960, 38–53. [Google Scholar]
  93. Aran, D.; Gury, M.; Jeanroy, E. Organo-metallic complexes in an Andosol: A comparative study with a Cambisol and Podzol. Geoderma 2001, 99, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Saggar, S.; Tate, K.R.; Feltham, C.W.; Childs, C.W.; Parshotam, A. Carbon turnover in a range of allophanic soils amended with 14C-labelled glucose. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 26, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Derenne, S.; Quénéa, K. Analytical pyrolysis as a tool to probe soil organic matter. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 111, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hernández, Z.; Almendros, G. Biogeochemical factors related with organic matter degradation and C storage in agricultural volcanic ash soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 44, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hernández, Z.; Almendros, G.; Álvarez, A.; Figueiredo, T.; Carral, P. Soil carbon stabilization pathways as reflected by the pyrolytic signature of humic acid in agricultural volcanic soils. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2019, 137, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Merlet, D. Mise au Point Technique Concernant l’Extraction et la Caractérisation des Composés Organiques Dans les Sols; Centre de Pédologie Biologique: Nancy, France, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  99. Davies, R.I. Relation of polyphenols to decomposition of organic matter and to pedogenetic processes. Soil Sci. 1971, 111, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Basaraba, J.; Starkey, R.L. Effect of plant tannins on decomposition of organic substances. Soil Sci. 1966, 101, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lynch, J.M. Products of soil microorganisms in relation to plant growth. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1976, 5, 67–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wang, T.S.C.; Yang, T.-K.; Chuang, T.-T. Soil phenolic acids as plant growth inhibitors. Soil Sci. 1967, 103, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hayes, M.H.B.; Swift, R.S. Vindication of humic substances as a key component of organic matter in soil and water. Adv. Agron. 2020, 163, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tiwari, J.; Ramanathan, A.; Bauddh, K.; Korstad, J. Humic substances: Structure, function and benefits for agroecosystems—A review. Pedosphere 2023, 3, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. De Nobili, M. La complessità della sostanza organica del suolo e le nuove prospettive di ricerca sull’umificazione. In Chimica del Suolo: Ieri, Oggi e Domani; Accademia dei Georgofili: Firenze, Italy, 2022; pp. 370–380. [Google Scholar]
  106. Dou, S.; Shan, J.; Song, X.; Cao, R.; Wu, M.; Li, C.; Guan, S. Are humic substances soil microbial residues or unique synthesized compounds? A perspective on their distinctiveness. Pedosphere 2020, 30, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Goulden, J.D.S.; Jenkinson, D.S. Studies on the organic material extracted from soil and compost. II. The infra-red spectra of ligno-proteins isolated from compost. J. Soil Sci. 1959, 10, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Almendros, G.; Polo, A.; Dorado, E. Estudio de los compuestos húmicos en diversos tipos de compost preparados a partir de paja de trigo.– II: Caracterización fisicoquímica de los compuestos húmicos. Agrochimica 1983, 27, 311–325. [Google Scholar]
  109. Khatami, S.; Deng, Y.; Tien, M.; Hatcher, P.G. Lignin contribution to aliphatic constituents of humic acids through fungal degradation. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 1565–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nip, M.; Tegelaar, E.W.; de Leeuw, J.W.; Schenck, P.A. A new non-saponifiable highly aliphatic and resistant biopolymer in plant cuticles. Naturwissenschaften 1986, 73, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. van Aarssen, B.G.K.; Leeuw, J.W.; Tegelaar, E.W. Recently discovered aliphatic biopolymers of vascular plants and algae and their impact on the environment. In Proceedings of the IV Workshop Chemistry and Analysis of Environmental Hydrocarbons, Strasbourg, France, 19–21 April 1990; p. 21. [Google Scholar]
  112. Holloway, P.J. The composition of suberin from the corks of Quercus suber L. and Betula pendula Roth. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1972, 9, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kolattukudy, P.E. Biosynthesis and degradation of lipid polymers. In Lipids and Lipid Polymers in Higher Plants; Tevini, M., Lichtenthaler, H.K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1977; Chapter 15; pp. 271–292. [Google Scholar]
  114. Almendros, G.; Sanz, J.; González-Vila, F.J.; Martin, F. Evidence for a polyalkyl nature of soil humin. Naturwissenschaften 1991, 78, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hatcher, P.G.; Maciel, G.E.; Dennis, L.W. Aliphatic structures of humic acids, a clue to their origin. Org. Geochem. 1981, 3, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Waksman, S.A. Humus, Origin, Chemical Composition and Importance in Nature; Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1936. [Google Scholar]
  117. Datta, R.; Kelkar, A.; Baraniya, D.; Molaei, A.; Moulick, A.; Meena, R.S.; Formanek, P. Enzymatic Degradation of Lignin in Soil: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Almendros, G.; Dorado, J.; González-Vila, F.J.; Blanco, M.J.; Lankes, U. 13C NMR assessment of decomposition patterns during composting of forest and shrub biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2000, 32, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lützow, M.V.; Kögel-Knabner, I.; Ekschmitt, K.; Matzner, E.; Guggenberger, G.; Marschner, B.; Flessa, H. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: Mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—A review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2006, 57, 426–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Martin, J.P.; Haider, K. Microbial activity in relation to soil humus formation. Soil Sci. 1971, 111, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Bell, A.A.; Wheeler, M.H. Biosynthesis and functions of fungal melanins. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 1986, 24, 411–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Haider, K.; Martin, J.P. Synthesis and transformation of phenolic compounds by Epicoccum nigrum in relation to humic acid formation. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 1967, 31, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. González-Vila, F.J.; Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Lentz, H.; Lüdemann, H.-D. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of fungal melanins. Z. Naturforsch. C 1978, 33, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Saiz-Jimenez, C.; Martin-Sanchez, P.M.; González-Pérez, J.A.; Hermosín, B. Analytical pyrolysis of the fungal melanins from Ochroconis spp. isolated from Lascaux cave, France. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Paim, S.; Linhares, L.E.; Mangrich, A.S.; Martin, J.P. Characterization of fungal melanins and soil humic acids by chemical analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1990, 10, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zavgorodnyaya, Y.A.; Demin, V.V.; Kurakov, A.V. Biochemical degradation of soil humic acids and fungal melanins. Org. Geochem. 2002, 33, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kumada, K.; Hurst, H.M. Green humic acid and its possible origin as a fungal metabolite. Nature 1967, 214, 631–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Almendros, G.; Martínez, A.T.; Dorado, E. Production of brown and green humic-like substances by Ulocladium atrum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1985, 17, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Valmaseda, M.; Martínez, A.T.; Almendros, G. Contribution by pigmented fungi to P–type humic acid formation in two forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1989, 21, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sato, O. A green pigment similar to the Pg fraction of P type humic acids and related compounds produced by litter-decomposing fungi. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1976, 22, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kumada, K.; Sato, O. Studies on the chemical properties of P type humic acid. Trans. Int. Symp. Humus Planta 1967, 4, 131–133. [Google Scholar]
  132. Kobayashi, T.; Rasmussen, C.; Sumida, H. Characterization of the perylenequinone pigments in Japanese Andosols and Cambisol. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 65, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Itoh, N.; Sakagami, N.; Torimura, M.; Watanabe, M. Perylene in Lake Biwa sediments originating from Cenococcum geophilum in its catchment area. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 95, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Watanabe, A.; Fujimori, H.; Nagai, Y.; Miyajima, T.; Kuwatsuka, S. Analysis of the green fraction of humic acids. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1996, 47, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Watanabe, M.; Tanaka, H.; Sakagami, K.; Aoki, K.; Sugiyama, S. Evaluation of Pg absorption strength of humic acids as a paleoenvironmental indicator in buried paleosols on tephra beds, Japan. Quat. Int. 1996, 34, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Almendros, G.; Dorado, E. Estudio de ácidos húmicos de tipo P. Distribución de los pigmentos verdes en las diferentes fracciones húmicas del suelo. An. Edafol. Agrobiol. 1985, 43, 547–559. [Google Scholar]
  137. Kumada, K.; Sato, O. Characteristics of the green fraction of P-type humic acid. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1980, 26, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. De Nobili, M.; Bravo, C.; Chen, Y. The spontaneous secondary synthesis of soil organic matter components: A critical examination of the soil continuum model theory. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 154, 103655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ertel, J.R.; Hedges, J.I. The lignin component of humic substances: Distribution among soil and sedimentary humic, fulvic, and base-insoluble fractions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1984, 48, 2065–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Andreux, F. Contribution à L’étude des Processus de Melanification des Autolysats Végétaux (Juglans regia). Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Nancy, Nancy, France, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  141. Schnitzer, M.; Khan, S.U. Humic Substances in the Environment; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  142. Suflita, J.M.; Bollag, J.M. Polymerization of phenolic compounds by a soil-enzyme complex. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1981, 45, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Andreux, F.; Golebiowska, D.; Chone, T.; Jacquin, F.; Metche, M. Caractérisation et transformation en milieu mull d’un modèle humique issu de l’autoxidation du système catechol-glycine et marqué séléctivement au carbone-14. In Soil Organic Matter Studies, Proceedings of the 5th Symposium IAEA, Braunschweig, Germany, 6–10 September 1976; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 1977; Volume II, p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  144. Shindo, H. Catalytic synthesis of humic acids from phenolic compounds by Mn(IV) oxide (Birnessite). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1990, 36, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zou, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, H.; Yue, D. Evolution of humic substances in polymerization of polyphenol and amino acid based on non-destructive characterization. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Bui, V.K.H.; Truong, H.B.; Hong, S.; Li, X.; Hur, J. Biotic and abiotic catalysts for enhanced humification in composting: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 402, 136832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sun, K.; Niu, Z.; Xiao, S.; Qi, X.; Li, S.; Chen, M.; Dai, L.; Si, Y. Artificially regulated humification in creating humic-like biostimulators. NPJ Clean Water 2024, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kiprop, A.K.; Marie-Camille, J.; Pourtier, E.; Kimutai, S.; Kirui, S. Synthesis of humic and fulvic acids and their characterization using optical spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR and UV-Visible). Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  149. Min, D.W.; Kim, K.; Lui, K.H.; Kim, B.; Kim, S.; Cho, J.; Choi, W. Abiotic formation of humic-like substances through freezing-accelerated reaction of phenolic compounds and nitrite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 7410–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Spiteller, M.; Schnitzer, M. A comparison of the structural characteristics of polymaleic acid and a soil fulvic acid. J. Soil Sci. 1983, 34, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Martin, F.; González-Vila, F.J.; Lüdemann, H.-D. About the similarity between polymaleic acid and water soluble humic fractions. Z. Naturforschung 1984, 369, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Almendros, G.; Martin, F.; González-Vila, F.J. Depolymerization and degradation of humic acids with sodium perborate. Geoderma 1987, 39, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Piccolo, A.; Spaccini, R.; Drosos, M.; Vinci, G.; Cozzolino, V. The molecular composition of humus carbon: Recalcitrance and reactivity in soils. In The Future of Soil Carbon its Conservation and Formation; Garcia, C., Nannipieri, P., Hernandez, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Chapter 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ellis, G.P. The Maillard reaction. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. 1959, 14, 63–134. [Google Scholar]
  155. Rubinsztain, Y.; Ioselis, P.; Ikan, R.; Aizenshtat, Z. Investigations on the structural units of melanoidins. Org. Geochem. 1984, 6, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Maillard, M.L.-C. Synthèse des matières humiques par action des acides aminés sur les sucres réducteurs. Ann. Chim. 1916, 5, 258–317. [Google Scholar]
  157. Nakaya, Y.; Okada, K.; Ikuno, Y.; Nakashima, S. Spectroscopic study of effects of goethite surfaces on the simulated Maillard reaction forming humic-like substances. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 16, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Benzing-Purdie, L.; Ripmeester, J.A. Melanoidins and soil organic matter: Evidence of strong similarities revealed by 13CP–MAS NMR. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1983, 47, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hardie, A.G.; Dynes, J.J.; Kozaka, L.M.; Huang, P.M. Abiotic catalysis of the Maillard and polyphenol-Maillard humification pathways by soil clays from temperate and tropical environments. In Molecular Environmental Soil Science at the Interfaces in the Earth’s Critical Zone; Xu, J., Huang, P.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhang, Y.; Yue, D.; Ma, H. Darkening mechanism and kinetics of humification process in catechol-Maillard system. Chemosphere 2015, 130, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Jokic, A.; Wang, M.C.; Liu, C.; Frenkel, A.I.; Huang, P.M. Integration of the polyphenol and Maillard reactions into a unified abiotic pathway for humification in nature: The role of δ-MnO2. Org. Geochem. 2004, 35, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wang, N.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, P.; Wang, M.; Sun, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S. Changes in the glucose concentration affect the formation of humic-like substances in polyphenol–Maillard reactions involving gibbsite. Molecules 2024, 29, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Popoff, T.; Theander, O. Formation of aromatic compounds from carbohydrates. Part III. Reaction of D-glucose and D-fructose in slightly acidic, aqueous solution. Acta Chem. Scand. 1976, 30, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ikan, R.; Ioselis, P.; Rubinsztain, Y.; Aizenshtat, Z.; Pugmire, R.; Anderson, L.L.; Ishiwatari, R. Carbohydrate origin of humic substances. Naturwissenschaften 1986, 73, 150–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Almendros, G.; Sanz, J.; Sobrados, I. Characterization of synthetic carbohydrate-derived humic-like polymers. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 81–82, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hodge, J.E. Chemistry of browning reactions in model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1953, 1, 928–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Feather, M.S.; Harris, J.F. Dehydration reactions of carbohydrates. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1973, 28, 161–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Almendros, G.; Dorado, J.; González-Vila, F.J.; Martin, F. Pyrolysis of carbohydrate–derived macromolecules: Its potential in monitoring the carbohydrate signature of geopolymers. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1997, 40–41, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Kumada, K. Carbonaceous materials as a possible source of soil humus. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1983, 29, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shindo, H.; Matsui, Y.; Higashi, T. Humus composition of charred plant residues. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1986, 32, 475–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Haumaier, L.; Zech, W. Black carbon–possible source of highly aromatic components of soil humic acids. Org. Geochem. 1995, 23, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Poirier, N.; Derenne, S.; Balesdent, J.; Rouzaud, J.-N.; Mariotti, A.; Largeau, C. Abundance and composition of the refractory organic fraction of an ancient, tropical soil (Pointe Noire, Congo). Org. Geochem. 2002, 38, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Marschner, B.; Brodowski, S.; Dreves, A.; Gleixner, G.; Gude, A.; Grootes, P.M.; Hamer, U.; Heim, A.; Jandl, G.; Ji, R.; et al. How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2008, 171, 91–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Skjemstad, J.O.; Taylor, J.A. Does the Walkley–Black method determine soil charcoal? Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1999, 30, 2299–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Glaser, B.; Haumaier, L.; Guggenberger, G.; Zech, W. Black carbon in soils: The use of benzenecarboxylic acids as specific markers. Org. Geochem. 1998, 29, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Contreras, E.; García, R.; Martínez, F.; Hernández, M.; Linares, J. Efecto de la temperatura, tiempo de oxidación y relación sustrato: Oxidante en el rendimiento y composición de los ácidos húmicos derivados del carbón, monitoreado por RMN de 1H y FT-IR. Rev. Téc. Ing. Univ. Zulia 2004, 27, 132–140. Available online: https://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0254-07702004000200006 (accessed on 14 July 2025).
  177. Almendros, G.; González-Vila, F.J.; Martin, F. Fire-induced transformation of soil organic matter from an oak forest. An experimental approach to the effects of fire on humic substances. Soil Sci. 1990, 149, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Almendros, G.; Knicker, H.; González-Vila, F.J. Rearrangement of carbon and nitrogen forms in peat after progressive thermal oxidation as determined by solid-state 13C- and 15N spectroscopy. Org. Geochem. 2003, 34, 1559–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Almendros, G.; Fründ, R.; González-Vila, F.J.; Haider, K.M.; Knicker, H.; Lüdemann, H.-D. Analysis of 13C and 15N CPMAS NMR-spectra of soil organic matter and composts. FEBS Lett. 1991, 282, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. DeBano, L.F.; Mann, L.D.; Hamilton, D.A. Translocation of hydrophobic substances by burning organic litter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1970, 34, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Giovannini, G.; Luchessi, S.; Cerevelli, S. Water-repellent substances and aggregate stability in hydrophobic soil. Soil Sci. 1983, 135, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Savage, S.M.; Osborn, J.; Letey, J.; Heaton, C. Substances contributing to fire–induced water repellency in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1972, 36, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. de Deus, M.; Miller, A.Z.; Jiménez-Morillo, N.T. Molecular characterization of burned organic matter at different soil depths and its relationship with soil water repellency: A preliminary result. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Shindo, H.; Matsui, Y.; Higashi, T. A possible source of humic acids in volcanic ash soils in Japan- Charred residue of Miscanthus sinensis. Soil Sci. 1986, 141, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Gerke, J. Concepts and misconceptions of humic substances as the stable part of soil organic matter: A review. Agronomy 2018, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Chebykina, E.; Abakumov, E. Characteristics of humic acids isolated from burned and unburned topsoils in sub-boreal Scotch pine forests by 13C-NMR spectroscopy. One Ecosyst. 2022, 7, e82720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Harvey, G.R.; Boran, D.A.; Chesal, L.A.; Tokar, J.M. The structure of marine fulvic and humic acids. Mar. Chem. 1983, 12, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Harvey, G.R.; Boran, D.A. Geochemistry of humic substances in seawater. In Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment and Water; Aiken, R.G., McKnight, D.M., Wershaw, R.L., MacCarthy, P., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1985; Chapter 9; pp. 233–247. [Google Scholar]
  189. Huc, C.; Durand, B.; Jacquin, F. Caractérisation des acides humiques de sédiments marins récents et comparaison avec leurs homologues terrestres. Bull. ENSAIA 1974, 16, 59–75. [Google Scholar]
  190. Hayes, M.H.B.; Mylotte, R.; Swift, R.S. Humin: Its Composition and Importance in Soil Organic Matter. Adv. Agron. 2017, 143, 47–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed soil processes contributing to C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems.
Figure 1. Proposed soil processes contributing to C sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems.
Sustainability 17 06689 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almendros, G.; González-Pérez, J.A. Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Mechanisms and the Chemical Nature of Soil Organic Matter—A Review. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156689

AMA Style

Almendros G, González-Pérez JA. Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Mechanisms and the Chemical Nature of Soil Organic Matter—A Review. Sustainability. 2025; 17(15):6689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156689

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almendros, Gonzalo, and José A. González-Pérez. 2025. "Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Mechanisms and the Chemical Nature of Soil Organic Matter—A Review" Sustainability 17, no. 15: 6689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156689

APA Style

Almendros, G., & González-Pérez, J. A. (2025). Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Mechanisms and the Chemical Nature of Soil Organic Matter—A Review. Sustainability, 17(15), 6689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156689

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop