Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Narrative Value and Experiential Quality of Urban Trails: A Case Study of the Southwest Regional Trail in Chongqing, China
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization for Intermodal Freight Transportation Planning: A Sustainable Service Network Design Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Recycling of Discarded Mattresses Through Extended Producer Responsibility: Is It More Cost-Effective than Incineration?

1
School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam and Zaanstad Court of Audit, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
School of Business and Economics and Tinbergen Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5542; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125542
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 5 June 2025 / Accepted: 6 June 2025 / Published: 16 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Waste and Recycling)

Abstract

About half of the discarded mattresses in the Netherlands are recycled, and the other half are incinerated. Based on a recently implemented sustainability measure of extended producer responsibility, the recycling rate should increase to 75% in 2028. Thereby, a recycling fee of EUR 12.5 per mattress should be introduced to finance the infrastructure to increase recycling. This study investigates the potential cost-effectiveness of mattress recycling through the reuse of materials, compared to the incineration of mattresses in Dutch energy-to-waste plants. The benefits of recycling include the avoidance of CO2 that would otherwise be released by incineration and the displacement of virgin material that would otherwise be used by producers as raw material. However, there are also significant costs associated with the collection and recycling process of complex products such as mattresses. Taking all factors into account, the cost of saving one ton of CO2 through mattress recycling is EUR 138. This is higher than alternatives such as wind energy, ETS prices, or carbon capture and storage. If the replacement energy is fully CO2-neutral or the recycling fee is lower, the costs of one ton of CO2 decrease but are still higher than most alternatives.
Keywords: recycling; incineration; mattresses; sustainability; cost-effectiveness analysis recycling; incineration; mattresses; sustainability; cost-effectiveness analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faber, B.; Gradus, R. Recycling of Discarded Mattresses Through Extended Producer Responsibility: Is It More Cost-Effective than Incineration? Sustainability 2025, 17, 5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125542

AMA Style

Faber B, Gradus R. Recycling of Discarded Mattresses Through Extended Producer Responsibility: Is It More Cost-Effective than Incineration? Sustainability. 2025; 17(12):5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faber, Bram, and Raymond Gradus. 2025. "Recycling of Discarded Mattresses Through Extended Producer Responsibility: Is It More Cost-Effective than Incineration?" Sustainability 17, no. 12: 5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125542

APA Style

Faber, B., & Gradus, R. (2025). Recycling of Discarded Mattresses Through Extended Producer Responsibility: Is It More Cost-Effective than Incineration? Sustainability, 17(12), 5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125542

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop