3.2.1. Electrical Conductivity and pH Studies
In the test proposed by Tashima et al. [
31], during a period of 7 days, it is possible to observe a reduction in the pH and electrical conductivity values, which indicates that the system is becoming unsaturated due to the progress of the pozzolanic reaction.
Within this context, pozzolanic materials can be classified into three categories, with the first being characterized by those with low pozzolanic reactivity, which present a weak reaction of Ca+2 and OH− ions with pozzolans, thus not having considerable changes in their electric conductivity values, as the solution remains saturated. The second category corresponds to materials that remain saturated in the first few hours of the test, with small changes in electrical conductivity. However, the calcium hydroxide is consumed at more advanced reaction times, and the pH and conductivity values show significant reductions. The last category corresponds to highly reactive materials that present the rapid consumption of calcium hydroxide, with a reduction in the pH and electrical conductivity values in the first few hours of the test.
The electrical conductivity results are represented in terms of the conductivity loss (
Lc (%)), being calculated according to Equations (1) and (2):
where
C0 = electrical conductivity of calcium hydroxide (CH) suspension without pozzolan addition;
Ct = electrical conductivity measured after t hours of reaction;
Ct,poz = electrical conductivity of pozzolan suspension (without CH) after t hours of reaction;
Ct,C = electrical conductivity corrected after t hours of reaction.
Figure 2a shows the conductivity loss for the CH/NY suspensions. All suspensions showed significant Lc values (%) during the 7 days of the test. The suspensions of 1.5:8.5, 2:8, 2.5:7.5, 3:7, and 3.5:6.5 showed values above 30% in the first hour of testing and the suspension of 4:6 after 8 h of reaction. Nyasil showed high pozzolanic reactivity, with high conductivity losses occurring in the first hour of testing. The pH results presented are only used to confirm the results obtained for the loss of conductivity.
Figure 3a presents the conductivity loss values for the CH/MS suspensions. Only the 1.5:8.5 and 2:8 suspensions showed conductivity losses greater than 30% in the first 8 h, reaching values, at the first day of testing, close to those presented after 7 days. For the 2.5:7.5 suspension, the unsaturation occurred in the period of 8–24 h. For the 3:7 suspension, the loss of conductivity reached 30% in approximately 24 h, whereas, for the 3.5:6.5 suspension, this occurred at approximately 80 h after the start of the test.
The 4:6 suspension did not reach the 30% value, remaining between 16 and 20% from the beginning to the end of the test and, therefore, showing a saturated state of the suspension according to the described method. Although silica fume is considered a highly reactive pozzolan, in this test, it presents moderate reactivity. This is due to the particles being densified. Comparing the results of NY and MS, NY presents greater reactivity, although both present content of more than 95% of amorphous silica in their compositions. This occurs because NY has a smaller particle diameter, thus presenting a larger specific surface area for the pozzolanic reaction to occur. Observing the reductions in the values of OH
− ions in
Figure 3b, the electrical conductivity results are confirmed.
Figure 4a shows the obtained Lc (%) values for the different CH/SK ratios tested. As expected, Sikron did not show reactivity, regardless of the proportions studied, nor did it show significant changes in its conductivity loss values throughout the test. This occurs because SK is ground quartz, which is essentially composed of crystalline silica. As well as the loss of conductivity, it is not possible to observe significant reductions in the OH
− values.
The Lc values (%) for the different CH/SCSA ratios can be seen in
Figure 5a. The only proportions that presented Lc (%) values greater than 30% were 1.5:8.5 and 2:8. The 1.5:8.5 suspension reached a value of 30% Lc (%) in the first hour of testing, reaching 47% at 4 h, and no major increases occurred until the end of the test (168 h), ending at 60%.
The 2:8 suspension reached a value of 30% at approximately 60 h, while, at 168 h, it showed a 36% loss of conductivity. The proportions of 2.5:7.5, 3:7, 3.5:6.5, and 4:6 did not show significant increases, thus not reaching unsaturation.
SCSA does not contain a large proportion of SiO
2, with 33.98% being total silica; of this silica, 86.05% is amorphous silica, which justifies the low reactivity of this material.
Figure 5b presents the concentrations of OH in the solutions, and it is possible to see that only the concentrations for 1.5:8.5 and 2:8 are lower, close to 0.001 mmol/L, since only these two present unsaturation.
Figure 6a shows the Lc (%) values of the CH/SCLA suspensions. Among all the proportions presented, only 4:6 does not present results greater than 30%. The proportions of 1.5:8.5 and 2:8 present Lc (%) values above 30% at an early age (1 and 4 h, respectively), with the 1.5:8.5 suspension reaching a 94% Lc (%) at 24 h and the 2:8 suspension showing a 91% Lc (%) at 48 h.
The 2.5:7.5 suspension reached a value of 30% for the Lc (%) after approximately 10 h of testing; at 48 h, it presented a value of 65%, having, at the end of the test, Lc = 80%. The 3:7 suspension reached an Lc (%) of 30% at 24 h, reaching a 57% Lc (%) after 72 h and not showing a significant increase until the end of the test. The 3.5:6.5 suspension reached an Lc (%) of 30% after approximately 48 h of testing, reaching 51% at 168 h.
As expected, although they come from the same plant, SCLA presents greater reactivity than SCSA, as SCLA is composed of a greater amount of total silica, namely 59.49%, of which 81.45% is amorphous silica. The pH values (
Figure 6b) decrease as the loss of conductivity increases.
The conductivity losses of the CH/ECSA suspensions are shown in
Figure 7a. The 1.5:8.5 suspension shows a great increase in the first hour of the test, exceeding a 30% Lc (%). However, after the first hour, the increases are smaller, reaching a value of approximately 65% for the Lc (%) after 168 h. As with the 1.5:8.5 suspension, the 2:8 suspension presents a great loss of conductivity in the first hour of testing, reaching a value of 31% for the Lc (%); after this reaction time, the values gradually increase until they reach a 54% Lc (%) at the end of the test.
The 2.5:7.5 suspension presents Lc (%) values of 30% at approximately 60 h after the start of the test, without a large increase after this period, thus reaching a final value of 44% Lc (%). The 3:7, 3.5:6.5, and 4:6 suspensions did not present Lc (%) values above 30%, meaning that the solution remained saturated after 168 h of testing. The OH
− values (
Figure 7b) obtained presented a similar trend, noting that 1.5:8.5 and 2:8 mixtures presented reductions of [OH
−] close to 0.001 mmol/L at the end of the test.
Comparing SCSA and ECSA (both with similar SiO
2 content), one can observe that ECSA showed slightly higher reactivity in terms of the pozzolanic reaction: the 2.5:7.5 suspension reached unsaturation for ECSA after 168 h, whereas SCSA presented Lc values lower than 20%. It is likely that the composition related to the other oxides (alkali and alkali-earth elements) contributed to this difference in behavior [
36].
Figure 8a shows the conductivity losses of the CH/ECLA suspensions. It is possible to observe that only the 4:6 ratio does not reach an Lc of 30%, remaining constant throughout the test and reaching only a 21% loss of conductivity at the end of the test. The proportions of 1.5:8.5 and 2:8 showed a large increase in the Lc values in the first hour of testing, reaching 96 and 82%, respectively, in the first 24 h. The 1.5:8.5 suspension reached an Lc of 30% within 3 h of testing and the 2:8 suspension did so within 4 h.
The 2.5:7.5 suspension showed an Lc of 30% within 8 h of testing and an 88% loss of conductivity after 168 h. The 3:7 suspension showed a 30% Lc after 27 h of testing and 71% at the end. Although the 3.5:6.5 ratio showed a loss of more than 30%, it did not show significant increases, reaching the end of the test with a 49% Lc.
ECLA showed a greater loss of conductivity than ECSA; this is because straw ash contains 31% more silica. The pH values (
Figure 8b) follow the electrical conductivity trends, so the greater the electrical conductivity loss, the lower the [OH
−] values found.
When SCLA and ECLA were compared, it was noted that ECLA showed greater reactivity, although they presented similar amounts of amorphous silica, with a small increase for ECLA. The Lc values at the end of the test (168 h) for the ECLA sample were higher than for SCLA: approximately 90% vs. 80% for the 2:8 suspension and 70% vs. 60% for the 2.5:7.5 suspension.
For the CH/RHA suspensions tested, the conductivity loss curves are shown in
Figure 9a. Unlike some pozzolans already presented, the 1.5:8.5 suspension for RHA required a somewhat longer amount of time to reach large increases in its conductivity loss values, reaching 30% in approximately 10 h and 80% in 48 h and presenting an Lc at the end of the test of 96%.
The 2:8 ratio reached an Lc of 30% after 13 h of testing, with a greater increase occurring at 24 h, reaching 48%; after this time, it reached 91% and remained stable because the solution presented low content of dissolved Ca(OH)2. The 2.5:7.5 suspension did not show considerable losses on the first day of testing, reaching 30% after approximately 33 h of testing, but, after more 24 h, there was a considerable increase in the Lc, reaching 89% after 168 h.
Like the previous suspension, the 3:7 one did not show significant increases in the first hour of testing, reaching a 75% Lc at the end of the test. The 3.5:6.5 suspension began to show more significant increases after 48 h, reaching a 30% Lc at 65 h and reaching 60% loss after 168 h. The 4:6 ratio did not show results equal to or greater than 30%, showing that the solution was saturated in Ca(OH)2.
The [OH
−] values (
Figure 9b) showed a similar trend to the conductivity results. Rice husk ash has 81.2% of its composition as silica; although it has a large amount, its reactivity at the beginning of the reaction time was significantly lower than that of active silica (
Figure 3a). This may occur because of the total silica—only 38.79% is amorphous silica—in addition to the differences in the particle morphology: active silica particles are formed from the agglomeration of particles smaller than 1 µm in diameter [
37], offering a greater surface area in contact with the solution. RHA presented a high LOI (6.99%), attributed to unburned carbon particles, which adhere to the surface of silica [
38]. With the progress of the reaction, the reactive silica in RHA was available, and, at 168 h, the Lc values for the RHA suspensions were high, although they were lower than those for silica fume (e.g., the 3:7 suspension reached a 70% Lc for RHA, whereas that for silica fume was 90%).
The conductivity losses of the CH/RLA suspensions are shown in
Figure 10a. The 1.5:2.8 suspension achieved a loss of 30% in 3 h and an 85% Lc after 24 h.
The 2:8 suspension showed a 30% Lc at approximately 5 h of testing and 83% at 96 h, while the 2.5:7.5 suspension reached a 30% Lc at 8 h and 81% at 96 h. The other suspensions showed more constant growth in the Lc, without abrupt increases. The 3:7 suspension reached 30% loss after 9 h, and, at the end of the test, it was 75%. Meanwhile, the 3.5:6.5 suspension reached a 30% Lc after 25 h of testing, reaching 56% after 168 h.
The last suspension analyzed, 4:6, remained almost stable during the test, having small increments and showing a loss of 30% at 72 h, but it showed a slightly greater increase between the penultimate and last day of testing, reaching a 46% Lc.
The [OH
−] reduction values (
Figure 10b) confirm the data presented. RLA presented 56.8% total silica in its composition, 24.4% lower than that of RHA (a different part of the same plant), but its reactivity appears to be higher. This may occur because, in RLA, although presenting a smaller amount of total silica, 81.20% is amorphous silica; thus, it must also contain a higher percentage of soluble components in its composition (e.g., K
2O and chlorides), which induced differences in its behavior. The [OH
−] monitoring results (
Figure 9b) show that a reduction in this parameter for the 3:7 to 4:6 suspensions was not evident, which suggests that the presence of a high percentage of soluble salts in RLA strongly affected the measurement of the pozzolanic reactivity.
The conductivity losses of the CH/BLA suspensions are shown in
Figure 11a. The 1.5:8.5 suspension showed rapid unsaturation, reaching a 30% Lc in 3 h of testing and an 86% Lc in 24 h. The 2:8 suspension also showed high Lc values, with 30% reached in the first 4 h of testing, 78% within 24 h and 88% at the end of the test. The 2.5:7.5 suspension had a large increase, but this occurred in 48 h, without presenting the rapid unsaturation of the system. In 9 h, it reached a 30% Lc; in 48 h, it reached 67%; and after 168 h, it reached a 78% Lc.
The loss of conductivity of the 3:7 suspension occurred slowly, reaching 30% at approximately 35 h after the start of the test and reaching a final loss of 58% after 168 h.
Among the suspensions presented, the 3.5:6.5 and 4:6 ones remained constant during the test, not presenting values greater than 26% for the Lc and thus remaining saturated. The pH values (
Figure 11b) are in accordance with the loss of conductivity.
BLA is considered a highly reactive ash and is composed of 69.85% total silica, of which 92.33% is silica ash. Although RHA has a greater amount of total silica in its composition, BLA presented a rapid pozzolanic reaction, while RHA presented a higher level of unsaturation after 168 h. This is due to the amorphous nature of the silica present.
Although BLA has a larger amount of total silica and amorphous silica, RLA exhibits superior reactivity in proportions with lower ash content. This can be explained by the fact that, despite both having a similar average particle size, RLA contains a larger amount of smaller particles, which contributes to greater reactivity in the solution.
Analyzing the results obtained for all pozzolans in this study, classification is carried out according to the reactivity, in terms of the loss in electrical conductivity (Lc) and pH. A safety margin of 30% loss of conductivity or Lc (%) is used; therefore, suspensions that presented an Lc above this value are considered unsaturated in calcium hydroxide and those below 30% are saturated. This allows us to calculate the time required for the suspension to reach 30% and be considered unsaturated (tuns (h)).
We achieve this in a similar way with the pH values, where we identify the pH value of the suspension when it reaches an Lc of 30%, and we obtain the difference (∆pH) compared to the initial pH (when t = 0); in the case of differences ≥ 0.15 units, they were recorded as they represented the unsaturation of the CH/pozzolan suspensions.
Table 6 presents the results obtained for ∆pH and the unsaturation time (t
uns) of the analyzed suspensions. We can observe that NY presented unsaturation for all proportions and this occurred earlier in time than for the other pozzolans analyzed. In addition to NY, the only material that presented reactivity above 30% for all proportions was RLA.
In addition to the amount of silica fume present in pozzolans, the surface area is another factor that contributes positively to the consumption of calcium hydroxide. NY has the smallest diameter among the pozzolans studied, consequently presenting a larger surface area and high levels of amorphous silica. RLA pozzolans have a large diameter compared to other pozzolans; however, they present an excellent level of amorphous silica.
The pozzolans were classified according to a reported template [
31]. For the 60 °C test, there are three zones for this classification: low reactivity (zone 1) for samples in which the 3:7 suspension did not reach unsaturation after 168 h; medium reactivity (zone 2) for samples in which the 4:6 suspension was not unsaturated and presented unsaturation for the 3:7 and/or 3.5:6.5 suspensions; and high reactivity (zone 3) for those cases in which the 4:6 suspension reached unsaturation. For a given pozzolan, when a mark has been placed in zone 3, this pozzolan should be considered a high-reactivity material.
In the tables, the symbol is shown in the last area where the suspension showed unsaturation. From the area in which this symbol appeared, the reactivity was determined.
Table 7 and
Table 8 present the symbols for each pozzolan and the final reactivity classification.