Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Climate Change and Dairy Farming
1.1.1. The Regional and Local Context of Dairy Farming in Canada
1.1.2. Quebec and Ontario: The Canadian Dairy Powerhouses
1.1.3. British Columbia: Diverse Climates and Farming Practices
1.1.4. Prairie Provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba): Adapting to Extremes
1.1.5. Atlantic Provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador): Small-Scale Operations
1.1.6. Northern Territories (Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut): Limited Dairy Farming
1.1.7. Local Adaptations and Innovations
1.1.8. Economic and Cultural Impact
1.1.9. Environmental Practices and Sustainability
1.2. Exploring Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Methanogenesis in Dairy Farming
1.3. Stakeholder Roles and Collaborative Efforts in Emission Reduction
2. The Agricultural Methane Reduction Challenge and Canada’s Environmental Goals
2.1. Freewalk Housing Systems
2.2. Multi-Climate Sheds
2.3. Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Innovative Smart Dairy Cow Housing
2.4. Advanced Flooring Systems
2.5. Low-Emission Floors with Slurry Scrapers
2.6. Compost-Bedded Pack Barns
2.7. Artificial and High-Welfare Floors
2.8. Slatted Floors with Flexible Flaps
2.9. Nanoparticles and Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water
2.10. Incorporating Dairy Farmers’ Preferences for Flooring Attributes
2.11. Air Treatment Technologies in Dairy Farming
2.12. Air Scrubbers
2.13. Chemical Air Scrubbers and Natural Ventilation
2.14. Oxidation of Methane
2.15. Ionization of Air
2.16. Pit Air Treatment and Air Velocity Optimization in Dairy Barns
2.17. Electrostatic Precipitators in Dairy Barns: An Emerging Technology for Dust Control
3. Advanced Manure Management Techniques
3.1. Acidification of Manure for Ammonia Emission Reduction
3.2. Aeromix System—Enhancing Microbial Activity in Manure
3.3. Automation in Manure Handling—V Scraper and Belt Systems
3.4. Comprehensive Approach to Manure Management
3.5. Enhanced Indoor Manure Treatment Technologies
3.6. Diverse Technological Approaches in Manure Treatment
3.7. Integrated Benefits of Indoor Manure Treatment
4. Nutritional Strategies for Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Dairy Farming
4.1. Methane Inhibitor Feed Supplements: The Efficacy of 3-Nitrooxypropanol
4.2. Tannins as Feed Additives
4.3. Optimizing Protein Content in Dairy Diets
4.4. Seaweed as a Methane-Reducing Agent
4.5. Inclusion of Red Clover and Other Legumes for Emission Control
4.6. Nitrate Supplementation for Mitigating Enteric Methane Emissions
4.7. Role of Linseeds and Oils in Methane Emission Reduction
4.8. Silage Characteristics and Management for Emission Reduction
4.9. Integrating Insects into Dairy Cattle Diets
4.10. Role of Ionophores and Monensin in Emission Control
5. Advanced Waste Management in Dairy Farming: The CowToilet and Its Implications for Ammonia Emission Reduction
5.1. Reevaluation of Dry Period Duration in Dairy Cows
5.2. Integrating Genetic Insights for Addressing Methane Emissions
5.3. The Cow Hologenome and Methane Emissions
5.4. The Resilient Dairy Genome Project
5.5. Breeding for Heat Tolerance and Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions
5.6. Advanced Integration of Real-Time Monitoring and Renewable Energy in Dairy Emission Management
5.7. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF)
5.8. Technological Advances in Emission Control
5.9. Renewable Energy Adoption in Dairy Operations
5.10. Innovative Bedding Management Practices
6. Techniques and Measures in Relation to Future Legislation
6.1. Navigating the Legislative Terrain for Sustainable Dairy Farming
6.2. The Role of Public Policy in Shaping Sustainable Dairy Farming
6.3. Legal Frameworks and Innovation in Dairy Farming
6.4. The Future of Dairy Farming in the Context of Legislative Changes
6.5. Economic and Regulatory Contexts in Dairy Farming
6.6. Understanding and Adapting to Economic and Policy Shifts
7. Case Studies of Regulatory Compliance and Benefits
7.1. The Netherlands’ Phosphate Reduction Plan
7.2. California’s Dairy Digester Research and Development Program
7.3. New Zealand’s Farm Environment Plans
7.4. Denmark’s Green Development and Demonstration Program (GUDP)
8. Lifecycle of Sustainable Dairy Farming
9. Building Resilience: Climate Adaptation in Dairy Farming
10. Lessons Learned and Pathways Forward
10.1. Collaborative Efforts toward a Sustainable Dairy Industry
10.2. The Synergy of Stakeholder Collaboration
10.3. Impact of Collaborative Efforts on Sustainability
10.4. Challenges and Opportunities in Collaborative Efforts
11. Summary and Conclusions
11.1. Future Prospects in Sustainable Dairy Farming
11.2. Global Perspectives on Sustainable Dairy Farming
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Livestock Don’t Contribute 14.5% of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Report. Available online: https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environment/livestock-dont-contribute-14-5-of-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed on 10 November 2023).
- Bačėninaitė, D.; Džermeikaitė, K.; Antanaitis, R. Global warming and dairy cattle: How to control and reduce methane emission. Animals 2022, 12, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Emissions Impossible: Methane Edition, Report. Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy (IATP) and the Changing Markets Foundation. Available online: https://www.iatp.org/emissions-impossible-methane-edition (accessed on 1 October 2023).
- Siegel, F.R. The Earth’s Human Carrying Capacity: Limitations Assessed, Solutions Proposed; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher, P.T. The ‘Dark Horse’ of Climate Change: Agricultural Methane Governance in the United States and Canada. Report. Available online: https://fordschool.umich.edu/sites/default/files/2022-04/NACP_Fisher_final.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2023).
- Dobson, S.; Goodday, V.; Winter, J. If it matters, measure it: A review of methane sources and mitigation policy in Canada. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2023, 16, 309–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skytt, T.; Nielsen, S.N.; Jonsson, B.G. Global warming potential and absolute global temperature change potential from carbon dioxide and methane fluxes as indicators of regional sustainability–A case study of Jämtland, Sweden. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 110, 105831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Proudman, J.; Mitloehner, F.M. Rethinking methane from animal agriculture. CABI Agric. Biosci. 2021, 2, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Black, J.L.; Davison, T.M.; Box, I. Methane emissions from ruminants in Australia: Mitigation potential and applicability of mitigation strategies. Animals 2021, 11, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berghuis, B.A.; Yu, F.B.; Schulz, F.; Blainey, P.C.; Woyke, T.; Quake, S.R. Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota reveals the shared ancestry of all methanogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 5037–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bueno de Mesquita, C.P.; Wu, D.; Tringe, S.G. Methyl-based Methanogenesis: An ecological and genomic review. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2023, 87, e00024-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vinco, E.; Morrison, N.; Bourassa, J.; Lhermie, G. Climate policy and Canadian crop production: A qualitative study of farmers’ attitudes and perceptions towards nitrous oxide reductions. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 418, 138108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, M.; Ahiduzzaman, M.; Kumar, A. How will Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions change by 2050? A disaggregated analysis of past and future greenhouse gas emissions using bottom-up energy modelling and Sankey diagrams. Appl. Energy 2018, 220, 754–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leahy, S.; Clark, H.; Reisinger, A. Challenges and prospects for agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation pathways consistent with the Paris Agreement. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nisbet, E.G.; Dlugokencky, E.J.; Fisher, R.E.; France, J.L.; Lowry, D.; Manning, M.R.; Michel, S.E.; Warwick, N.J. Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: Challenges alongthe path to Net Zero. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2021, 379, 20200457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Launches New Agricultural Methane Reduction Challenge. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/agriculture-agri-food/news/2023/11/agriculture-and-agri-food-canada-launches-new-agricultural-methane-reduction-challenge.html (accessed on 15 December 2023).
- Ominski, K.; Gunte, K.; Wittenberg, K.; Legesse, G.; Mengistu, G.; McAllister, T. The role of livestock in sustainable food production systems in Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 101, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabruch, M.; Micheels, E.T. Differences in Production Costs Across Compliance Scenarios for Canadian Cow-Calf Producers Accessing the EU Market. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2020, 11, 221–240. [Google Scholar]
- Beaver, A.; Weary, D.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A. Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle housed in tiestalls compared to less-restrictive housing types: A systematic review. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 9383–9417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erjavec, K.; Klopčič, M. Views of Consumers, Farmers and Stakeholders on Alternative Dairy Cattle Housing Systems. Animals 2022, 12, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Galama, P.J.; Ouweltjes, W.; Endres, M.I.; Sprecher, J.R.; Leso, L.; Kuipers, A.; Klopčič, M. Symposium review: Future of housing for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 5759–5772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanco-Penedo, I.; Ouweltjes, W.; Ofner-Schröck, E.; Brügemann, K.; Emanuelson, U. Symposium review: Animal welfare in free-walk systems in Europe. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 5773–5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benedičič, J.; Erjavec, K.; Klopčič, M. Environmental sustainability: Farmers’ views of housing systems for cattle. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 21, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curth-van Middelkoop, J.C.; de Boer, H.C.; Galama, P.J. Characteristics of organic manure from’Freewalk’housing, compared with slurry, and their appreciation by farmers. In Proceedings of the Meeting the Future Demands for Grassland Production, Helsinki, Finland, 19–22 October 2020; Volume 25, pp. 686–688. [Google Scholar]
- Witkowska, D.; Ponieważ, A. The effect of housing system on disease prevalence and productive lifespan of dairy herds—A case study. Animals 2022, 12, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gargiulo, J.I.; Eastwood, C.R.; Garcia, S.C.; Lyons, N.A. Dairy farmers with larger herd sizes adopt more precision dairy technologies. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 5466–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW); Nielsen, S.S.; Alvarez, J.; Bicout, D.J.; Calistri, P.; Canali, E.; Drewe, J.A.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Gonzales Rojas, J.L.; Gortázar Schmidt, C.; et al. Welfare of dairy cows. EFSA J. 2023, 21, e07993. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bewley, J.M.; Robertson, L.M.; Eckelkamp, E.A. A 100-Year Review: Lactating dairy cattle housing management. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 10418–10431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, R.; Thakur, A.; Thakur, R.; Dogra, P.K. Livestock shelter management: Climate change perspective. In Climate Change and Livestock Production: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 129–140. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Li, L.; Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, D. Effects of heat stress on body temperature, milk production, and reproduction in dairy cows: A novel idea for monitoring and evaluation of heat stress—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costantino, A.; Fabrizio, E.; Calvet, S. The Role of Climate Control in Monogastric Animal Farming: The Effects on Animal Welfare, Air Emissions, Productivity, Health, and Energy Use. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, U.; Malacco, V.M.; Bai, H.; Price, T.P.; Datta, A.; Xin, L.; Sen, S.; Nawrocki, R.A.; Chiu, G.; Sundaram, S.; et al. Integration of technologies and systems for precision animal agriculture—A case study on precision dairy farming. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 101, skad206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qi, F.; Zhao, X.; Shi, Z.; Li, H.; Zhao, W. Environmental Factor Detection and Analysis Technologies in Livestock and Poultry Houses: A Review. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, G.T.; Kang, H.; Na, Y.; Lee, S. PSIV-6 A real-time monitoring system for composting of livestock manure. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97 (Suppl. S3), 223–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekele, W.; Guinguina, A.; Zegeye, A.; Simachew, A.; Ramin, M. Contemporary methods of measuring and estimating methane emission from ruminants. Methane 2022, 1, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Nan, X.; Yang, L.; Zheng, S.; Jiang, L.; Xiong, B. A review of enteric methane emission measurement techniques in ruminants. Animals 2020, 10, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balafoutis, A.; Beck, B.; Fountas, S.; Vangeyte, J.; Van der Wal, T.; Soto, I.; Gómez-Barbero, M.; Barnes, A.; Eory, V. Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. Artificial intelligence and sensor technologies in dairy livestock export: Charting a digital transformation. Sensors 2023, 23, 7045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital livestock farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2021, 32, 100408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkel, A.; Bokma, S.; Hol, J.M.G.; Blanken, K. Ammonia Emission of the MeadowFloor CL for Dairy Barns: A Case-Control Study in the Environmental Research Barn of Dairy Campus; Wageningen Livestock Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2020; No. 1275. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, E.G.; Peterson, C.B.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Mitloehner, F.M. Manure flushing vs. scraping in dairy freestall lanes reduces gaseous emissions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hempel, S.; Janke, D.; Losand, B.; Zeyer, K.; Zähner, M.; Mohn, J.; Amon, T.; Schrade, S. Comparison of Methane Emission Patterns from Dairy Housings with Solid and Slatted Floors at Two Locations. Agronomy 2022, 12, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, A.; Mainau, E.; Manteca, X.; Siurana, A.; Castillejos, L. Impacts of compost bedded pack barns on the welfare and comfort of dairy cows. Animals 2020, 10, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biasato, I.; D’Angelo, A.; Bertone, I.; Odore, R.; Bellino, C. Compost bedded-pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy: Effects on animal health and welfare and milk and milk product quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1142–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emanuelson, U.; Bruegemann, K.; Klopčič, M.; Leso, L.; Ouweltjes, W.; Zentner, A.; Blanco-Penedo, I. Animal health in compost-bedded pack and cubicle dairy barns in Six European countries. Animals 2022, 12, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weerasinghe, W.P.C.G.; Rajapaksha, E.; Gunawardena, W.W.D.A.; Ammunekumbura, I.D.E.M.; Samarakone, T.S. Effect of rubber and concrete flooring on resting behavior, hock injuries, and milk production of primiparous Friesian crossbred dairy cows housed in a free-stall barn in Mid-Country, Sri Lanka. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herzog, A.; Hörtenhuber, S.; Winckler, C.; Kral, I.; Zollitsch, W. Welfare intervention and environmental impacts of milk production–cradle-to-farm-gate effects of implementing rubber mats in Austrian dairy farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 123953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, M.B.; Proudfoot, K. Welfare at Calving and of the Growing Animals. In Cattle Welfare in Dairy and Beef Systems: A New Approach to Global Issues; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 265–295. [Google Scholar]
- De Oliveira, D.; Barth, K.; Haskell, M.J.; Hillmann, E.; Jensen, M.B.; Johnsen, J.F.; Mejdell, C.; Waiblinger, S.; Ferneborg, S. Methodology for experimental and observational animal studies in cow-calf contact systems. J. Dairy Res. 2020, 87 (Suppl. S1), 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poteko, J.; Zähner, M.; Schrade, S. Effects of housing system, floor type and temperature on ammonia and methane emissions from dairy farming: A meta-analysis. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 182, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, S.M.E.; Murshed, H.M. Application of Electrolyzed Water on Livestock. In Electrolyzed Water in Food: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 205–222. [Google Scholar]
- Ogunniyi, A.D.; Dandie, C.E.; Ferro, S.; Hall, B.; Drigo, B.; Brunetti, G.; Venter, H.; Myers, B.; Deo, P.; Donner, E.; et al. Comparative antibacterial activities of neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water and other chlorine-based sanitizers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Demirci, A.; Graves, R.E.; Puri, V.M. Conventional and emerging clean-in-place methods for the milking systems. In Raw Milk; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 91–115. [Google Scholar]
- Rebezov, M.; Saeed, K.; Khaliq, A.; Rahman, S.J.U.; Sameed, N.; Semenova, A.; Khayrullin, M.; Dydykin, A.; Abramov, Y.; Thiruvengadam, M.; et al. Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry: A review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.K.; Wang, C.K. Electrolyzed water and its pharmacological activities: A mini-review. Molecules 2022, 27, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarker, N.C.; Rahman, S.; Borhan, M.S.; Rajasekaran, P.; Santra, S.; Ozcan, A. Nanoparticles in mitigating gaseous emissions from liquid dairy manure stored under anaerobic condition. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 76, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L.; Liu, X.; Miao, Y.; Chatzisymeon, E.; Yang, P.; Lu, H.; Pang, L. Response of cattle manure anaerobic digestion to zinc oxide nanoparticles: Methane production, microbial community, and functions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.Z.; Zaidi, A.A.; Naseer, M.N.; AlMohamadi, H. Nanomaterials for biogas augmentation towards renewable and sustainable energy production: A critical review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 868454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owusu-Sekyere, E.; Hansson, H.; Telezhenko, E. Dairy farmers’ heterogeneous preferences for animal welfare-enhancing flooring properties: A mixed logit approach applied in Sweden. Livest. Sci. 2021, 250, 104591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, J.O.; Robling, H.; Cederberg, C.; Spörndly, R.; Lindberg, M.; Martiin, C.; Ardfors, E.; Tidåker, P. What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years. Agric. Syst. 2023, 212, 103779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inno-Plus Systems. Exploring Air Scrubber Pros and Cons for Livestock Farms. 2023. Available online: https://inno-plussystems.com/en/air-scrubber-pros-and-cons/ (accessed on 10 November 2023).
- Rychła, A.; Amon, B.; Hassouna, M.; van der Weerden, T.J.; Winiwarter, W. Costs and effects of measures to reduce ammonia emissions from dairy cattle and pig production: A comparison of country-specific estimations and model calculations. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 344, 118678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti, C.; Guarino, M.; Bacenetti, J. Measurements techniques and models to assess odor annoyance: A review. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, T.; Zheng, Y.; Dong, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cong, Q. A new air cleaning technology to synergistically reduce odor and bioaerosol emissions from livestock houses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 342, 108221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, S.K.; Bhatia, R.K.; Jeon, J.M.; Kumar, G.; Yang, Y.H. Carbon dioxide capture and bioenergy production using biological system–A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 110, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontovas, C.A. Integration of air quality and climate change policies in shipping: The case of sulphur emissions regulation. Mar. Policy 2020, 113, 103815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.A.; Ikeguchi, A.; Naide, T. Effectiveness of an air cleaner device in reducing aerosol numbers and airborne bacteria from an enclosed type dairy barn. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 53022–53035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gohel, R.; Siabbweka, M.; Singh, R.; Thanki, A.A.; Jadeja, U. Sampling, detection, and health impacts of bioaerosols emitted from livestock facilities. In Bioaerosols Emission from Anthropogenic Sources; Woodhead Publishing: Thorston, UK, 2024; pp. 141–161. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, D.M.; Heguy, J.; Karle, B.; Robinson, P.H. Characterize Physical and Chemical Properties of Manure in California Dairy Systems to Improve Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates; California Environmental Protection Agency; California Air Resources Board: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ambrose, H.W.; Dalby, F.R.; Feilberg, A.; Kofoed, M.V. Additives and methods for the mitigation of methane emission from stored liquid manure. Biosyst. Eng. 2023, 229, 209–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomasello, N.; Valenti, F.; Cascone, G.; Porto, S.M. Improving natural ventilation in renovated free-stall barns for dairy cows: Optimized building solutions by using a validated computational fluid dynamics model. J. Agric. Eng. 2021, 52, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Zhao, B.; Jia, Y.; He, F.; Chen, W. Mitigation strategies of air pollutants for mechanical ventilated livestock and poultry housing—A review. Atmos 2022, 13, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janke, D.; Willink, D.; Ammon, C.; Hempel, S.; Schrade, S.; Demeyer, P.; Hartung, E.; Amon, B.; Ogink, N.; Amon, T. Calculation of ventilation rates and ammonia emissions: Comparison of sampling strategies for a naturally ventilated dairy barn. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 198, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.; Zhang, Y. A review of effects and control methods of particulate matter in animal indoor environments. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2004, 54, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.A.; Ikeguchi, A.; Naide, T. Aerosols and bacteria concentration in different types of Japanese dairy milking houses. In Proceedings of the 10th International Livestock Environment Symposium (ILES X), Omaha, NE, USA, 25–27 September 2018; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2018; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Rong, L.; Zheng, W. Research progress on animal environment and welfare. Anim. Res. One Health 2023, 1, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanišević, M.S.; Zoranović, M.S.; Topisirović, G.R.; Jugović, M.A.; Rajs, V.M.; Vejnović, S.M.; Kešelj, K.R. New concept of in/out air quality control in livestock buildings. Therm. Sci. 2022, 26, 4819–4829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed-Nour, A.; Al-Sewailem, M.; El-Naggar, A.H. The influence of alkalization and temperature on ammonia recovery from cow manure and the chemical properties of the effluents. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuchs, A.; Dalby, F.R.; Liu, D.; Kai, P.; Feilberg, A. Improved effect of manure acidification technology for gas emission mitigation by substituting sulfuric acid with acetic acid. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overmeyer, V.; Kube, A.; Clemens, J.; Büscher, W.; Trimborn, M. One-time acidification of slurry: What is the most effective acid and treatment strategy? Agronomy 2021, 11, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavanagh, I.; Burchill, W.; Healy, M.G.; Fenton, O.; Krol, D.J.; Lanigan, G.J. Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 237, 117822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, A.A.; Fangueiro, D.; Carvalho, M. Slurry acidification as a solution to minimize ammonia emissions from the combined application of animal manure and synthetic fertilizer in no-tillage. Agronomy 2022, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dooren, H.J.C.; Bokma, S.; Zonderland, J.L. Effect van het Aeromix Systeem op Ammoniakemissie in een Melkveestal: Verkennend Onderzoek op Dairy Campus. Wageningen UR Livestock Research (Livestock Research Report 850), 2023, 25. Available online: https://edepot.wur.nl/335747 (accessed on 15 November 2023).
- Varma, V.S.; Parajuli, R.; Scott, E.; Canter, T.; Lim, T.T.; Popp, J.; Thoma, G. Dairy and swine manure management–Challenges and perspectives for sustainable treatment technology. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odmark, I. The Effects of Floor System on Production in Automatic Milking Systems; Second Cycle, A2E. Degree Project Report in Animal Science; Deptartment of Animal Nutrition and Management, SLU: Uppsala, Sweden, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hilgert, J.E.; Herrmann, C.; Petersen, S.O.; Dragoni, F.; Amon, T.; Belik, V.; Ammon, C.; Amon, B. Assessment of the biochemical methane potential of in-house and outdoor stored pig and dairy cow manure by evaluating chemical composition and storage conditions. Waste Manag. 2023, 168, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janni, K.; Cortus, E. Common animal production systems and manure storage methods. In Animal Manure: Production, Characteristics, Environmental Concerns, and Management; John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; Volume 67, pp. 27–43. [Google Scholar]
- Fangueiro, D.; Merino, P.; Pantelopoulos, A.; Pereira, J.L.; Amon, B.; Chadwick, D.R. The Implications of Animal Manure Management on Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In Technology for Environmentally Friendly Livestock Production; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 99–136. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Krooneman, J.; Euverink, G.J.W. Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure: Laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Wang, X. Manure treatment and utilization in production systems. In Animal Agriculture; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 455–467. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, R.; Qiao, W.; Guo, J.; Sun, H. Manure treatment and recycling technologies. In Circular Economy and Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 161–180. [Google Scholar]
- Fouts, J.Q.; Honan, M.C.; Roque, B.M.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Enteric methane mitigation interventions. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2022, 6, txac041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honan, M.; Feng, X.; Tricarico, J.M.; Kebreab, E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: Modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021, 62, 1303–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; Ungerfeld, E.M.; Eckard, R.J.; Wang, M. Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal 2020, 14, s2–s16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aboagye, I.A.; Beauchemin, K.A. Potential of molecular weight and structure of tannins to reduce methane emissions from ruminants: A review. Animals 2019, 9, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ku-Vera, J.C.; Jiménez-Ocampo, R.; Valencia-Salazar, S.S.; Montoya-Flores, M.D.; Molina-Botero, I.C.; Arango, J.; Gómez-Bravo, C.A.; Aguilar-Pérez, C.F.; Solorio-Sánchez, F.J. Role of secondary plant metabolites on enteric methane mitigation in ruminants. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso-Gutierrez, E.; Aranda-Aguirre, E.; Robles-Jimenez, L.E.; Castelán-Ortega, O.A.; Chay-Canul, A.J.; Foggi, G.; Angeles-Hernandez, J.C.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E.; González-Ronquillo, M. Effect of tannins from tropical plants on methane production from ruminants: A systematic review. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2021, 14, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lileikis, T.; Nainienė, R.; Bliznikas, S.; Uchockis, V. Dietary Ruminant Enteric Methane Mitigation Strategies: Current Findings, Potential Risks and Applicability. Animals 2023, 13, 2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrade, S.; Zeyer, K.; Mohn, J.; Zähner, M. Effect of diets with different crude protein levels on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a naturally ventilated dairy housing. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 896, 165027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katongole, C.B.; Yan, T. The Effects of Dietary Crude Protein Level on Ammonia Emissions from Slurry from Lactating Holstein-Friesian Cows as Measured in Open-Circuit Respiration Chambers. Animals 2022, 12, 1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Bhowmick, G.; Hayes, M. Potential of Seaweeds to Mitigate Production of Greenhouse Gases during Production of Ruminant Proteins. Glob. Chall. 2023, 7, 2200145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muizelaar, W.; van Duinkerken, G.; Khan, Z.; Dijkstra, J. Evaluation of 3 northwest European seaweed species on enteric methane production and lactational performance of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 4622–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camer-Pesci, B.; Laird, D.W.; van Keulen, M.; Vadiveloo, A.; Chalmers, M.; Moheimani, N.R. Opportunities of Asparagopsis sp. cultivation to reduce methanogenesis in ruminants: A critical review. Algal Res. 2023, 76, 103308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terry, S.A.; Krüger, A.M.; Lima, P.M.; Gruninger, R.J.; Abbott, D.W.; Beauchemin, K.A. Evaluation of rumen fermentation and microbial adaptation to three red seaweeds using the rumen simulation technique. Animals 2023, 13, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.R.; Wilkinson, R.G.; Sinclair, L.A. Feeding lower-protein diets based on red clover and grass or alfalfa and corn silage does not affect milk production but improves nitrogen use efficiency in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 1773–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassanat, F.; Benchaar, C. Methane emissions of manure from dairy cows fed red clover-or corn silage-based diets supplemented with linseed oil. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 11766–11776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irawan, A.; Jayanegara, A.; Niderkorn, V. Impacts of red clover and sainfoin silages on the performance, nutrient utilization and milk fatty acids profile of ruminants: A meta-analysis. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sato, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Aoki, H.; Murayama, M.; Oishi, K.; Hirooka, H.; Yoshida, T.; Kumagai, H. Calcium salts of long-chain fatty acids from linseed oil decrease methane production by altering the rumen microbiome in vitro. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos, J.S.; de Aráujo, L.P.; Allaman, I.B.; Lôbo, I.P.; de Oliva, S.T.; Tavares, T.M.; de Almeida Neto, J.A. Evaluation of the reduction of methane emission in swine and bovine manure treated with black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahraman, O.; Gülşen, N.; İnal, F.; Alataş, M.S.; İnanç, Z.S.; Ahmed, İ.; Şişman, D.; Küçük, A.E. Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Fermentation Parameters in Total Mixed Rations of Dairy Cows with Varied Levels of Defatted Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens) as a Substitute for Soybean Meal. Fermentation 2023, 9, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques, R.D.S.; Cooke, R.F. Effects of ionophores on ruminal function of beef cattle. Animals 2021, 11, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, P.; Biggs, R. Feed Additives for Beef Cattle Production; Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service: Durant, OK, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- de Sá Assis, M.C.; Costa, G.R.D.R.; Dias, F.M.C.; da Silva, C.S.; de Lima, J.S.; Torres, T.R.; Silva, D.K.D.A.; de Souza, E.J.O. Can phytogenic additives replace monensin sodium in beef cattle feeding? Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Daily Churn Magazine. Henk Hanskamp’s Unique CowToilet Is Designed to Capture Cow’s Urine in a Barn. 2020. Available online: https://www.darigold.com/dutch-innovator-designs-unique-toilet-for-cows/ (accessed on 10 August 2023).
- Dirksen, N.; Langbein, J.; Schrader, L.; Puppe, B.; Elliffe, D.; Siebert, K.; Röttgen, V.; Matthews, L. Learned control of urinary reflexes in cattle to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, R1033–R1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dirksen, N.; Langbein, J.; Schrader, L.; Puppe, B.; Elliffe, D.; Siebert, K.; Röttgen, V.; Matthews, L. How can cattle be toilet trained? Incorporating reflexive behaviours into a behavioural chain. Animals 2020, 10, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Hedainy, D.K.; Ramadan, R.M.; Saleh, A.A.; Sharaby, M.A.; Rashad, A.M. Retrospective Investigation of The Association Between the Length of Dry Period and Lactation Milk Production and Lifetime Traits During the Subsequent Lactations. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2023, 13, 1512–1515. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, D.H.; Ki, K.S.; Kim, D.H.; Han, M.; Kim, Y. Effects of dry period length on milk production and physiological responses of heat-stressed dairy cows during the transition period. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2023, 65, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez-Recio, O.; Scrobota, N.; López-Paredes, J.; Saborío-Montero, A.; Fernández, A.; de Maturana, E.L.; Villanueva, B.; Goiri, I.; Atxaerandio, R.; Rodríguez-García, A. Diving into the cow hologenome to reduce methane emissions and increase sustainability. Animal 2023, 17, 100780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Staaveren, N.; Oliveira, H.R.; Houlahan, K.; Chud, T.C.; Oliveira Jr, G.A.; Hailemariam, D.; Kistemaker, G.; Miglior, F.; Plastow, G.; Schenkel, F.S.; et al. The Resilient Dairy Genome Project–a general overview of methods and objectives related to feed efficiency and methane emissions. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 65, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pryce, J.E.; Richardson, C.; Cheruiyot, E.; van den Berg, I.; Haile-Mariam, M. Using genetics to combat global warming and improve heat tolerance in dairy cows. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Animal Production and Health Current Status and Way Forward, Vienna, Austria, 28 June–2 July 2021; pp. 198–204. [Google Scholar]
- Bokde, N.D.; Milkevych, V.; Nielsen, R.K.; Villumsen, T.M.; Sahana, G. A novel approach for anomaly detection in dairy cow gas emission records. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023, 214, 108286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berdos, J.I.; Ncho, C.M.; Son, A.R.; Lee, S.S.; Kim, S.H. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Estimation for Cattle: Assessing the Potential Role of Real-Time Feed Intake Monitoring. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethirajan, S. AI-Driven Climate Neutrality in Dairy Farming: Benchmarking Emissions for Sustainable Transformation. 2023. Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/4znq5 (accessed on 1 December 2023).
- Prasad, M.N.V.; Smol, M.; Freitas, H. Achieving sustainable development goals via green deal strategies. In Sustainable and Circular Management of Resources and Waste Towards a Green Deal; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 3–23. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, T.; Sun, Y.; Shi, Y.; Ma, J.; Feng, C.; Chen, Z. Air pollution control policies and impacts: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hundal, H. Quantifying Aquatic Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in Riparian Agroforestry Zones. Master’s Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Cradock-Henry, N.A.; Flood, S.; Buelow, F.; Blackett, P.; Wreford, A. Adaptation Knowledge for New Zealand’s Primary Industries: Known, Not Known and Needed. Clim. Risk Manag. 2019, 25, 100190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, A.S.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Christensen, T.B.; Hulgaard, L. The European Green Deal and the State of the European Environment. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Socioecological Challenges: Sustainable Transformations Globally and in the EU; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Lamine, C.; Marsden, T. Unfolding sustainability transitions in food systems: Insights from UK and French trajectories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2206231120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thiermann, I.; Bittmann, T. Should I stay or should I go? The impact of nature reserves on the survival and growth of dairy farms. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 328, 116993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oenema, J.; Oenema, O. Intensification of grassland-based dairy production and its impacts on land, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2021, 8, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoekstra, N.J.; Schulte, R.P.O.; Forrestal, P.J.; Hennessy, D.; Krol, D.J.; Lanigan, G.J.; Müller, C.; Shalloo, L.; Wall, D.P.; Richards, K.G. Scenarios to limit environmental nitrogen losses from dairy expansion. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 134606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosavi, P. Manure, Methane, and Money: The Anaerobic Digester Disaster in California. Anim. Law Rev. 2023, 29, 41. [Google Scholar]
- O’Malley, J.; Pavlenko, N.; Kim, Y.H. 2030 California Renewable Natural Gas Outlook: Resource Assessment, Market Opportunities, and Environmental Performance. 2023. Available online: https://theicct.org/publication/california-rng-outlook-2030-may23/ (accessed on 15 November 2023).
- Macintosh, K.; Dairy, N.Z. A Risk Assessment Approach for Prioritising Actions in Farm Environment Plans with Mahinga Kai Values. 2021. Available online: https://ourlandandwater.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/OLW_RPF24_prioritising-actions-in-FEPS_FinalReport.pdf (accessed on 31 August 2023).
- Zamri, I.H. Reporting and Measuring Environmental Impacts of Dairying: Perceptions and Practices. Thesis, University of Canterbury. 2021. Available online: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/items/1190619b-53c2-4d6b-bfa7-a656c7d45d31 (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- Jørgensen, U.; Jensen, S.K.; Ambye-Jensen, M. Coupling the benefits of grassland crops and green biorefining to produce protein, materials and services for the green transition. Grass Forage Sci. 2022, 77, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Technology Type | Functionality | Emission Control Efficiency | Animal Welfare Impact | Adoption Rate | Cost Implications | Technical Complexity | Maintenance Requirements |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Air Scrubbers | Remove airborne contaminants | High | Positive | Moderate | High initial investment | Moderate | Regular cleaning and filter replacement |
Chemical Air Scrubber and Natural Ventilation | Chemical pollutant removal and air dilution | High for gases | Positive | Growing | Moderate to High | Moderate | Chemical replenishment and system checks |
Methane Oxidation Systems | Convert methane to less harmful gases | High for methane | Neutral | Low | Significant investment | High | Regular monitoring and catalyst replacement |
Air Ionization | Charge and remove airborne particles | Moderate | Positive | Emerging | Moderate | Moderate | Periodic maintenance of ion generators |
Pit Air Treatment | Treat manure pit emissions | High for ammonia | Positive | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Regular system checks and adjustments |
Electrostatic Precipitators | Capture fine dust particles | High for particulates | Positive | Low | High initial cost | High | Regular cleaning of collection plates |
Biofiltration Systems | Biological degradation of pollutants | Moderate to High | Positive | Emerging | Moderate | Low to Moderate | Regular biofilter medium replacement |
Ventilation Fans | Circulate and refresh barn air | Low direct emission control | Positive | High | Low | Low | Routine maintenance |
UV Light Treatment | Inactivate airborne pathogens | Low for GHGs, high for pathogens | Positive | Emerging | Moderate | Moderate | Regular bulb replacement |
Heat Recovery Ventilators | Recover heat and improve air quality | Low direct emission control | Positive | Low | Moderate to High | Moderate | Periodic maintenance and cleaning |
Climate-Controlled Barns | Maintain optimal indoor climate | Indirect emission control | Highly Positive | Growing | High initial investment | High | Regular system checks and maintenance |
Ozone Generators | Oxidize and neutralize odors | Moderate for odors | Caution required | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Periodic ozone generator maintenance |
Natural Ventilation Systems | Utilize natural air flow | Low direct emission control | Positive | High | Low | Low | Minimal |
Mechanical Ventilation Systems | Controlled air exchange | Moderate | Positive | High | Moderate | Moderate | Regular maintenance and checks |
Humidity Control Systems | Regulate barn humidity | Indirect impact on emissions | Positive | Moderate | Moderate to High | Moderate | Regular checks and adjustments |
Strategy | Effectiveness (% Reduction in Methane) | Animal Health Impact | Scalability | Research Support | Cost Implications | Practicality in Dairy Diets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methane Inhibitor Supplements (e.g., 3-NOP) | Up to 30% | Generally beneficial | Widely applicable | Well-researched | Significant investment required | Feasible with careful planning |
Tannin Additions | Up to 15%, varies with type and amount | Beneficial in controlled quantities | Applicable with limitations | Substantial research | Investment varies based on source | Requires careful integration |
Protein Content Optimization | Up to 10%, depending on diet balance | Beneficial when properly balanced | Widely applicable | Strong evidence base | Variable, depending on protein sources | Feasible with nutritional expertise |
Seaweed Supplementation (e.g., Asparagopsis taxiformis) | Up to 80% in controlled settings | Ongoing research | Emerging | Developing research | Higher due to sourcing and processing | Challenging due to supply and dosage |
Legume Inclusion (e.g., Red Clover) | Up to 20%, depending on diet mix | Generally positive, with dietary balance | Widely applicable | Well-supported by research | Moderate, dependent on local availability | Easily integrated into grazing systems |
Nitrate Addition | Up to 20%, with careful management | Requires careful management to avoid toxicity | Moderate applicability | Considerable evidence | Investment varies with nitrate source | Requires close monitoring for safety |
Linseed/Oil Usage | Up to 15%, varies with diet composition | Enhances fatty acid profile | Moderate scalability | Substantial evidence | Can be higher, depends on oil type | Integration depends on dietary balance |
Adaptive Grazing Practices | Variable, can achieve up to 10% | Generally beneficial | Highly adaptable | Emerging evidence | Lower than intensive methods | Highly feasible, particularly in pasture-based systems |
Silage Management and Quality | Up to 10%, depends on silage quality | Positive impact on digestion and nutrient uptake | Highly scalable | Extensive research | Investment varies with silage Technology | Highly feasible with proper management |
Ionophore Usage (e.g., Monensin) | Up to 10%, subject to production system | Mixed, may be restricted in some systems | Limited applicability | Well-established research | Relatively lower cost | Limited in organic or certain dairy systems |
Fiber-Based Diet Adjustments | Variable, can achieve up to 10% | Positive for rumen health | Highly scalable | Strong research base | Generally lower than other supplements | Easily implemented with proper dietary planning |
Alternative Feed Sources (e.g., Insects) | Under Research | Currently under investigation | Emerging area | In early stages of research | Potentially higher due to production costs | Initial challenges in integration and acceptance |
Legislative/Policy Initiative | Objectives | Impact on Dairy Farming | Compliance Requirements | Farmer Support Mechanisms | Future Implications | Additional Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greenhouse Gas Emission Policies | Reduce GHG emissions from dairy farms | Requires changes in farm practices to lower emissions | Emission monitoring and reduction targets | Subsidies and incentives for low-emission technology | Shifting towards more sustainable farming methods | Critical for meeting Canada’s climate targets |
Nutrient Runoff Regulations | Control and reduce nutrient runoff into water bodies | Mandates eco-friendly nutrient management practices | Nutrient management plans and runoff controls | Training and funding for nutrient management | Greater emphasis on environmental stewardship | Essential for protecting water quality and ecosystems |
Animal Welfare Standards | Ensure the welfare and humane treatment of dairy cattle | Requires adoption of welfare-centric farming practices | Standards for housing, feeding, and animal care | Guidance and support for welfare improvements | Enhanced focus on animal health and productivity | Aligns with global animal welfare movements |
Renewable Energy Initiatives | Promote the use of renewable energy sources | Encourages use of solar, wind, and biogas systems | Integration of renewable energy systems | Grants and subsidies for renewable energy adoption | Shift towards energy self-sufficiency in farming | Supports Canada’s renewable energy goals |
Market Regulations | Regulate market practices and prices for dairy products | Influences production, pricing, and distribution Decisions | Compliance with pricing, quality, and supply regulations | Market support and stabilization programs | Adjustments to market dynamics and farmer income | Affects domestic and international market competitiveness |
International Agreements (e.g., Paris Climate Accord) | Align national practices with global climate goals | Necessitates adherence to global emission targets | Meeting internationally set emission reduction goals | Access to international markets and funding | Alignment with global environmental strategies | Critical for global climate change mitigation |
Fertilizer Use Policies | Reduce environmental impact of fertilizer use | May limit certain fertilizers, promotes eco-friendly alternatives | Adherence to regulated fertilizer types and usage | Access to eco-friendly fertilizers and training | Increased focus on sustainable agriculture practices | Impacts on soil health and crop productivity |
Water Conservation Regulations | Ensure efficient and sustainable water use | Impacts irrigation and water use methods | Implementation of water-saving technologies | Support for efficient irrigation and water management | Enhanced sustainability of water resources in farming | Vital for resource conservation in agriculture |
Land Use and Zoning Laws | Manage land use for environmental and economic balance | Influences farm location and expansion decisions | Adherence to land use regulations and permits | Guidance on sustainable land use and expansion | Balanced development and environmental conservation | Balances agricultural needs with environmental concerns |
Feed Quality Standards | Ensure high-quality and safe feed for cattle | Affects feed choice and nutrition planning | Compliance with feed quality and safety standards | Access to quality feed and nutritional advice | Improved animal health and product quality | Directly affects cattle health and milk production |
Manure Management Guidelines | Implement effective manure management to reduce pollution | Changes in manure storage, treatment, and disposal | Compliance with manure management regulations | Assistance with manure management infrastructure | Reduced environmental impact from manure | Important for nutrient recycling and pollution control |
Biosecurity Regulations | Prevent disease spread in dairy herds | Enhances farm biosecurity measures | Implementation of disease prevention protocols | Training and resources for biosecurity | Increased farm resilience against diseases | Essential for maintaining herd health |
Dairy Product Labeling and Standards | Standardize dairy product quality and provide consumer information | Affects packaging, labeling, and product information dissemination | Adherence to labeling standards and quality control | Guidance on product standards and labeling requirements | Improved consumer trust and product transparency | Influences consumer choices and market trends |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Neethirajan, S. Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change. Sustainability 2024, 16, 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010265
Neethirajan S. Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change. Sustainability. 2024; 16(1):265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010265
Chicago/Turabian StyleNeethirajan, Suresh. 2024. "Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change" Sustainability 16, no. 1: 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010265
APA StyleNeethirajan, S. (2024). Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Dairy Farming in Canada amidst Climate Change. Sustainability, 16(1), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010265