Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Business Performance: Examining the Role of Green HRM Practices, Green Innovation and Responsible Leadership through the Lens of Pro-Environmental Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Can Data Elements Promote the High-Quality Development of China’s Economy?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Enabled Mobile Edge Computing in 6G Communications: A Systematic Literature Review

by
Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun
1,2,
Joseph Bamidele Awotunde
3,
Agbotiname Lucky Imoize
4,5,
Chun-Ta Li
6,*,
AbdulRahman Tosho Abdulahi
7,
Abdulwasiu Bolakale Adelodun
8,
Samarendra Nath Sur
9 and
Cheng-Chi Lee
10,11
1
Department of Computer Science, Landmark University, Omu-Aran 251103, Nigeria
2
Department of Multimedia Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania
3
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information and Communication Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 240003, Nigeria
4
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos 100213, Nigeria
5
Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Institute of Digital Communication, Ruhr University, 44801 Bochum, Germany
6
Bachelor’s Program of Artificial Intelligence and Information Security, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24206, Taiwan
7
Department of Computer Science, Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin 240211, Nigeria
8
ECWA College of Nursing and Midwifery, Egbe 262103, Nigeria
9
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Sikkim Manipal University, Majitar 737136, Sikkim, India
10
Research and Development Center for Physical Education, Health, and Information Technology, Department of Library and Information Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
11
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung City 41354, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7315; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097315
Submission received: 6 January 2023 / Revised: 19 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023

Abstract

:
Mobile edge computing (MEC) supported by non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has recently gained a lot of interest due to its improved ability to lessen power consumption and MEC offload delay. In recent decades, the need for wireless communications has increased tremendously. Fifth-generation (5G) communications will soon be widely used and offer much more functionality than a fourth generation (4G). Between 2027 and 2030, an innovative wireless communication paradigm is known as the sixth generation (6G) system is projected to be introduced with the full help of artificial intelligence (AI). Advanced system capacity, higher data rate, lower latency, advanced security, and improved quality of service (QoS) than 5G systems are a few of the main challenges to resolve with 5G. The growing need for data rates in the sixth generation (6G) communication networks are being met by extraordinary technologies such as NOMA, Soft Computing (SC), and MEC. Owing to the massive attention to the NOMA-enabled MEC, there has been a significant spike in the number of papers published in this area, while more comprehensive studies and classifications are still needed. Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, the investigation reports a systematic literature review (SLR) of NOMA-enabled MEC. This survey also evaluates numerous pieces of literature prudently chosen over a multi-step procedure and meets the selection criteria described in the paper summarizing our review.

1. Introduction

Researchers have thought about the 6G generation of cellular networks, which can handle significantly greater data rates and numerous future applications [1,2,3], while 5G networks are still in the deployment phase [4,5,6]. The three main application services that 5G communications focus on providing are improving mobile broadband (eMBB), supplying ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC), and providing massive machine-type communications (mMTC). Contrarily, 6G networks may run programs that enable augmented reality, virtual reality, linked and autonomous drones and cars, and intelligent and automated devices. Compared to the gigabit per second data rate offered by 5G networks, these networks necessitate a data throughput of up to terabit per second for all of them [7,8]. The utilization of the tera-Hz band is a crucial component of 6G networks. 5G networks currently use millimetre-wave and sub-6GHz spectrum. 6G networks offer sub-1ms latency and 99.99999% reliability, enabling universal communication and several future uses. To improve communication capacity, offer better channel estimations for effective signal transfer, and enable dependable data propagation, 6G will use full-duplex communication and other physical layer technologies [9,10,11]. Additionally, 6G will leverage AI to make autonomous systems possible, distributed learning techniques to boost precision, big data analytics for forecast and wise decision-making, and the realization of smart cloud, fog, and edge nodes [12,13,14,15]. For 6G networks, energy efficiency will be a significant problem [16,17,18]. Supporting widespread IoT applications is one of the primary causes of the need for increased power consumption [19]. Future network nodes, such as Internet of Things (IoT) gadgets and fog nodes, will have a lot of work to do, increasing power consumption [20,21]. Adopting Tera Hz communications, a short-range communications technology presents another energy-related difficulty for 6G networks. Higher data speeds are possible with the tera-Hz transmission, but it is severely attenuated because of propagation losses and molecular absorption losses [18,22]. 6G networks will prioritize energy-efficient schemes by delivering less-power communications, new energy harvesting (EH) procedures, and energy-saving computing approaches. 6G networks, which will increase connection, boost computational power, and enhance detection and location accuracy, will also enable massive IoT applications. 6G could offer tera-Hz communications, incredibly high data throughput, and extremely small latency because of its capabilities and technologies [23].
NOMA has been recommended as a substitute for traditional orthogonal multiple access (OMA) because it can improve the number of authorized individuals, bandwidth effectiveness, and reduce downtime [24,25]. NOMA’s fundamental notion is to allow many individuals to transmit signals simultaneously on a particular bandwidth block. The successive interference cancellation (SIC) technique is used as a multiuser authentication strategy at the reception point to reduce disturbance [26,27]. Integrating NOMA and MEC has become a promising way to deliver efficient transmission and processing to many devices. Implementing NOMA enables multiple clients to synchronously transfer their computational operations to a machine located at the network’s periphery, thereby increasing computational capability and effectiveness. A significant amount of investigation has been committed to improving MEC’s efficacy in wireless connections by employing NOMA techniques. [28,29,30]. The developers of [28] sought to reduce system energy usage by enhancing people gathering, resource apportionment, and broadcast rules. The scholars of [29] jointly adjusted jobs and transmission periods to reduce structure interruption in NOMA-centered MEC connections. In [30], the investigators examined the employment of gadget-to-gadget approaches to improve people’s cooperation and alleviate the computational load on the edge server in NOMA-centered MEC connections. The publications mentioned above [28,29,30] concentrated mostly on the case of individual-cell relationships, ignoring the utmost all-inclusive and interesting challenge of NOMA-centered MEC in multicell networks understudied. This study examines how the NOMA strategy can produce cost-effective MEC in multiple node connections where various clients synchronously delegate processing tasks to their corresponding SBSs. Intra- and inter-cell disturbance in multiple node connections can severely degrade the effectiveness of NOMA-centered MEC if not appropriately maintained [31,32,33]. Considering this concern, we propose a combination of wireless and computational power distribution techniques to improve the environmental sustainability of NOMA-centered MEC while meeting clients’ utmost permissible latency requirements. In the suggested framework, the non-convex energy utilization optimization challenge is separated into subchannel distribution, allocation of electricity, and computation resource distribution problems. The researchers additionally illustrate why resolving these issues continuously can optimize energy utilisation. The mathematical outcomes demonstrate that their proposed method can improve the computational effectiveness of NOMA-centered MEC in multiple-cell connectivity.
NOMA ranks as one of the most intriguing electromagnetic transmission techniques for the forthcoming era of mobile communication. NOMA offers numerous desirable improvements across the conventional orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) and today’s de facto standard OMA innovations, such as expanded spectral efficacy, lowered delay, superior reliability, and a large interconnection. NOMA’s guiding terms of reference provide many users with a single value in terms of duration, intensity, and position [34].
The numerous NOMA methodologies can be broadly classified into two major groups: power-domain NOMA and code-domain NOMA. Several approaches for access dependent on lower-density dissemination and patchy code allocation may be employed to improve the classification of code-domain NOMA. In this setting, lattice-partition has several accessibilities, multiple uses of shared-key in several utilizations, and pattern-division multiple connections strongly correlate with numerous connection strategies [34].
The latest study indicates that NOMA can be utilized in numerous sixth-generation (6G) transmission scenarios involving Machine-to-Machine (M2M) connections and the IoT. Furthermore, there is an indication that efficacy can be improved once NOMA is used with additional effective mobile communication strategies. These include shared interactions, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) [35], beam formation, space–time programming network of things programming, and full-duplex. Standards and Technology of NOMA have been developed for the future of American digital TV standard (ATSC 3.0) as layered-division multiplexing (LDM) and launched for the third-generation partnership project (3GPP) as multi-user superposition transmission (MUST) [34].
As a result of the fact that NOMA permits several users to use the same resource, interference occurs in such systems. Thus, current resource management and interference mitigation strategies, particularly for ultra-dense networks, need to be reconsidered owing to the inclusion of extra disturbance this new technology provides. Beamforming and the resulting difficulties (e.g., precoding) in massive-MIMO systems provide additional obstacles that must be resolved to realise these technologies’ full potential. Existing channel coding, modulation, and estimation issues about the physical layer must also be updated. Cognitive, cooperative, and visible light communications are favourable paradigms under NOMA systems compared to traditional methods. Yet, the difficulties that have arisen due to the inclusion of this new technology must be resolved before reaping the advantages of these paradigms. While NOMA provides various benefits, more users’ increased information sensing capability due to this approach poses a greater security and privacy risk. To develop a strong, efficient, and successful system using this method, several security issues ranging from physical to application levels must be resolved. [34].
NOMA trumps conventional orthogonal multiple access (OMA) in several ways, including:
  • It achieves superior spectral efficiency by serving multiple users simultaneously with the same frequency resource and mitigating interference through SIC.
  • It increases the number of simultaneously served users, thus supporting massive connectivity; and 3. It achieves superior spectral efficiency by doing multiple users simultaneously and with the same frequency resource, mitigating interference through SIC.
  • Due to the nature of simultaneous transmission, a user does not need to send information within a predetermined time, resulting in shorter latency;
  • NOMA can preserve the user-fairness and diversified quality of service by flexible power regulation between strong and weak users [36]. Specifically, when more power is provided to a vulnerable user, NOMA provides greater cell-edge throughput, improving the user experience.
To increase throughput, decrease latency, and conserve energy in RAN, NOMA approaches can be combined with MEC [37,38,39]. The authors presented the heterogeneous NOMA MEC network with numerous mobile edge server nodes providing computing for end devices [37]. The authors suggest an ideal offloading protocol that reduces latency and energy use. Similar findings were reported by Wan, Xu, Xu, and Ahmad [38]. The authors use an optimisation technique to optimise the transmit power allocation of the users, the computing resource allocation of the MEC servers, and the time allocation. According to the findings, the system has a lower total delay than OMA systems. It has been established that the NOMA MEC-based system, created by Dong, Li, Yue, and Xiang [39], increases system throughput and energy efficiency. In the model, two users cooperate with a MEC AP to communicate utilizing uplink NOMA. The NOMA MEC network performs better than other networks, as shown by the Monte-Carlo simulation with the message chain length, signal-to-noise ratio, and transmission time parameters.

1.1. The NOMA Mathematical Characterization, When Compared with OMA

NOMA, which has higher spectral efficiency than traditional orthogonal multiple access (OMA) [40,41], has recently attracted much research interest. For instance, NOMA has been suggested for downlink circumstances in systems utilizing the long-term development of the 3GPP [42,43]. NOMA has been suggested as a potential multiple-access method for future cellular communication networks [44,45]. However, the current multiple-access methods used in cellular communication networks, such as Orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) for 4G, FDMA for 1G, time division multiple access (TDMA) for 2G, and code-division multiple access (CDMA) for 3G, are all examples of OMA methods. These methods have a limitation where spectrum resources assigned to users with poor channel conditions are not utilized effectively, which makes them less than ideal.
The idea of NOMA is put up as a solution to this problem and to further increase spectrum efficiency. NOMA is used in conjunction with superposition coding (SC) at the base station (BS) and successive interference cancellation (SIC) at the consumers to obtain the best possible reception for compromised broadcast stations [46]. In a two-user, single-input, single-output (SISO) NOMA structure, for illustration, the base station supports clients on the same channel simultaneously using the time, software, and bandwidth while overlapping transmissions with a distinct distribution of energy factors. The proximal client, who encounters robust circuit circumstances, unravels its shared communication before deriving it by deducting the other person’s statement from its assessment. The far user, who has weak channel conditions, decodes its message by considering the partner’s message to be noise. This approach provides both parties with complete accessibility to all resource blocks (RBs), and the nearby person can decode its data without interruption from the distant user. Hence, compared to traditional OMA techniques, the overall performance is improved.

1.2. Problem Formulation for Sound Mathematical Representations

Consider a downlink communication arrangement with one BS and K user, where each user has a single antenna. The signal at user i is received using NOMA transmission and is shown in Equation (1)
y = h i x + n i ,   i = 1 ,   2 ,   ,   K ,
where h i signifies the station coefficient, and n i   ~   N 0 ,   N 0 is the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) at client i , i = 1 K P i s i is the superposition of s i s with power allocation policy P = P 1 ,   P 2 ,   ,   P K / i = 1 K P i = P , s i signifies the data envisioned to communicate to the client i, P i signifies the power assigned to client i, and P represents the total power constraint. For effortlessness of examination, we accept that h 1     h 2       h K and the total bandwidth is normalized to unity in this review.
In this paper, we establish the minimal rate constraint r * In the interest of consumer impartiality. The following condition should be guaranteed by the power allocation policy mathematically as seen in Equation (2):
m i n   i r i     r * ,
where r i Is the user i possible rate in nats/sec/Hz, which is determined by Equation (3)
r i = l n 1 + P i h i 2 N 0 + h i 2 j = 1 i 1 P j
The summation in the denominator becomes zero for the exceptional case of i = 1 , and the associated rate changes to as seen in Equation (4):
r 1 = l n 1 + P i h i 2 N 0
The fact that the channels are ordered and the user with the stronger channel can decode the messages delivered to the user with the weaker channel indicates that r i is possible. Consequently, the Equations (5)–(7) that follows is capable of being utilized to address the optimization challenge of enhancing the overall aggregate rate while satisfying the consumer’s equitable requirement for NOMA frameworks:
R N     max P i t = 1 K r i
s . t . r i = l n 1 + P i h i 2 N 0 + h i 2 j = 1 i 1 P j ,
t = 1 K P i   P ,
Conventional OMA structures, which include FDMA or TDMA, allocate duration/frequency resources quasi-adaptively, giving every customer an established subchannel. To simplify designation, we refer to this kind of OMA as OMA-TYPE I in the present investigation. Therefore, the OMA-TYPE-I optimization challenge is capable of being formulated in the following Equations (8) and (9), presuming that all consumers will receive an equal volume of assets (the duration or bandwidth):
R 01     m a x P i t = 1 K r i          
s . t .                         r i = 1 K l n 1 + K P i h i 2 N 0 ,
The optimization problem for jointly designing power and sub-channel allocations will be addressed because some users may encounter poor channel conditions due to significant route loss and random fading caused by sub-channel allocations that are not optimal. When the total time/frequency is divided into n sub-channels that will be shared orthogonally among K users, the following Equations (10)–(15) represents the optimization problem:
R 0 X     m a x P i , n ,   S i t = 1 K n S i r i ,   n
s . t .                         r i ,   n = 1 N l n 1 + P i ,   n h i 2 N 0 1 N ,
n = 1 N i = 1 K P i ,   n P ,
P i ,   n   0 ,   i ,   n
n S i r i ,   n     r * ,
S 1 ,   S 2 , ,   S K   are   disjoint ,   P i ,   n   and   h i ,   n
S 1 ,   S 2     S K = 1 ,   2 ,   ,   N ,  
The power allotted to and the station coefficient of the client i’s sub-station, correspondingly, are denoted as P i ,   n and h i . S i is the collection of sub-channel indexes that are allotted to client i . Be aware that the optimization issue in Equation (16) is not arched. Admittedly, it is found that by substituting the discrete solution with the following optimization problem, it might be a continuous one with an upper-bounded time/frequency allocation like this:
R 02     m a x P i , n ,   α i t = 1 K r i
s . t .                         r i = α i l n 1 + P i ,   n h i 2 α i N 0 ,
i = 1 α i = 1 .
The OMA system with the optimization described in Equations (16)–(18) is referred to as OMA-TYPE-II in this paper for notational simplicity. Because the energy conservation i = 1 K α i P i α i = P is created in TDMA throughout all user orthogonal time slots, and the effective noise power becomes α i N 0 in FDMA, it should be noted that the optimization difficulties in Equations (14) and (16) apply to both technologies. The definitions of the three different types of OMA systems is suggest in Equation (19)
R 01     R 0 X     R 02
Consequently, we must demonstrate that NOMA is superior to OMA to illustrate its superiority as seen in Equation (20).
R N     R 02 .
However, OMA-TYPE-I and OMA-TYPE-II are considered in this research to uncover more complex aspects of these OMA systems. Also, distinct mathematical techniques must demonstrate NOMA’s superiority over OMA-TYPE-I and OMA-TYPE-II.

1.3. Fundamentals of the NOMA System

The CD-NOMA and PD-NOMA systems enable manifold clients to access the same wireless resources in the coding and power domains. This creates non-orthogonality in client access. This work focuses on the PD-NOMA system, where users sharing the same resources are assigned different power levels [46,47]. PD-NOMA further supports user fairness by providing the user with a high transmission power and a low channel gain. Conversely, the greater the channel gain, the less user will get broadcast power. This indicates that clients’ power coefficients are allocated among corresponding clients contrariwise proportionate fashion with their station circumstances [48]. Additionally, under the NOMA system, a single subcarrier may be allotted to several clients, and each client can collect data from manifold subcarriers.
  • NOMA’s capacity to support manifold clients with the equivalent time-frequency resource makes it highly spectrum-efficient, resulting in improved spectral efficiency (SE). This, in turn, can enhance the system throughput.
  • Improved fairness for users can be achieved through the NOMA system, which allows for greater flexibility in the allocation of radio resources. By relaxing the orthogonal restraint of the OMA scheme, NOMA permits efficient resource allocation, promoting user fairness.
  • The non-orthogonal assignment of resources of the NOMA scheme implies that the available resources do not constrain the supported users or devices. With a less non-orthogonal resource allocation, NOMA can accommodate more users than OMA.
  • The NOMA technique can be considered an “add-on” to existing OMA methods as it uses a distinct power-domain dimension. As superposition coding and SIC methodology are well-established in theory and practice, NOMA can be linked to modern MA approaches. This makes NOMA compatible with different systems.
  • In the 6G connection, using OMA incurs significant latency and signalling costs due to the access grant required in the uplink. This is deemed unacceptable. As a solution, the NOMA approach can provide low transmission delay and signalling requirements.
NOMA, on the other hand, facilitates confer-free upstream dissemination, reducing dissemination delay and transmitting complexity. Additionally, serving multiple users in a NOMA network helps to minimize latency. However, the following are some drawbacks of the NOMA scheme [49]:
  • The overhead for CSI feedback is increased in the NOMA system because the base station (BS) needs to identify the top CSI to achieve the best-translating directive for the SIC scheme.
  • The SIC process increases the computational complexity of the receiver side, especially for multicarrier and multi-user systems.
  • In the NOMA system, the communication cost is heightened because the strong user needs to be aware of the energy dissemination of the feebler client to implement SIC.
  • As a result of distributing more power to the poor users, the whole system experiences increased inter-cell interference.

1.4. Resource Allocation Issue for the NOMA System

For NOMA systems, optimizing performance requires efficient resource allocation, which involves power allocation (PA), subcarrier-user assignment (SUA), or user pairing (UP). UP refers to the selection of multiplexed consumers for each subcarrier, while PA involves the allocation of the total power budget among the subcarriers and the distribution power per subcarrier among users sharing the same subcarrier. UP and PA structures aim to accomplish various performance metrics, including:
  • Increasing the overall scheme ability, thereby enhancing SE and EE.
  • Decrease the likelihood of outages.
  • Improve the data transfer rate for slow clients.
  • Improve the effectiveness of the SIC
  • Increase the fairness between users
  • Reduce energy use as much as possible.
NOMA-enabled MEC has some protocols and practices, which are discussed as follows:
  • 3GPP Standards: The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) is a worldwide standard-setting organization establishing mobile telephone technology protocols. NOMA-MEC is being investigated as a component of 3GPP’s 6G advancement. 6G requirements for NOMA and MEC are right now being designed. For instance, 3GPP is developing a NOMA-based network layer specification for 6G, which is anticipated further to boost the wireless transmission system’s efficacy and bandwidth. NOMA-MEC technological advances are additionally being investigated for the subsequent infrastructure of the 6G system.
  • IEEE Standards: IEEE is an accredited body that creates norms for numerous technologies. IEEE is investigating NOMA-MEC as a component of the ongoing creation of the IEEE 802.11 norm, the accepted norm for wireless local area networks (WLANs). In particular, IEEE 802.11ax(Wi-Fi 6) and IEEE 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) are being created to facilitate NOMA-MEC, which is anticipated to boost the speed and effectiveness of WLANs.
  • European Commission (EC) Policy Framework: The EC has put forward guidelines for implementing networks capable of supporting 5G and, afterwards, encompassing the encouragement of periphery computing and the advancement of spectrum-use protocols. To guarantee the competitive edge of European enterprises, the regulatory structure further emphasizes the necessity to support creativity and investment in cutting-edge technologies like NOMA-MEC.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology: The NIST in the United States released policies applicable to the NOMA-MEC system aimed at edge computing safety. These policies involve suggestions for safeguarding edge technology, guaranteeing safe connections within edge technology and the cloud, and protecting the confidentiality of data.
Therefore, regulatory authorities and other agencies are proactively creating NOMA MEC-related standards and policies to facilitate the sequent application of this innovation effectively and safely.
With 6G’s ability to handle numerous edge applications and facilities with reduced latency and power utilization, edge computing (EC) has become an essential constituent of 5G communication [50]. Extending cloud computing facilities to the system edge fetches these facilities quicker to consumer devices [51]. Conventional EC’s three main computing technologies are MEC, cloudlets, and fog computing (FC) [52,53,54]. MEC is considered to deliver facilities to mobile consumers despite permitting them to access regional resources. To extend the pertinency of MEC to diverse structures (e.g., immobile access expertise, Wi-Fi, etc.), the word “mobile” has been dropped since 2016. MEC has been renamed Multi-Access Edge Computing (MAEC) by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute’s Industry Specification Group (ETSI ISG) to consider best the increasing concentration of MEC among non-cellular carriers [55].
MEC is a significant technology for the subsequent wave of wireless systems [56]. The fundamental knowledge behind MEC is to leverage base stations and other mobile network infrastructure as compute servers, enabling mobile operators to delegate their most crucial activities to the servers to avoid computationally costly ad delays [57,58]. Because MEC servers have more processing power than local servers, these computations can be finished faster than locally. Because local computing does not require energy, MEC suggests to offers mobile operators the advantage of longer battery life from a power consumption perspective [59,60,61]. MEC is vital in the wireless Internet of Things (IoT) environment, where gadgets usually have limited power and computing capabilities [62]. MEC provides an alternative to employing IoT devices for local task computing for machine learning (ML) applications that is low-latency and power-efficient [63,64].
The utilization of NOMA for MEC discharge is inspired by the need for spectrally and energy-efficient release in MEC networks [65,66,67]. The development of analytical findings for the successful likelihood of MEC discharge demonstrated in [68,69] that using NOMA communication may momentously decrease the interruption and energy usage of the MEC discharge. The study of the NOMA-centered MEC approach scheme founded on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) in [70,71,72,73] resulted in the creation of state-of-the-art joint power and subcarrier assignment techniques. There was a discussion of utilising unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in NOMA-aided MEC structures [74,75], and several initiatives for cooperative MEC resource distribution and UAV trajectory schedules were established [76,77]. The security of NOMA-MEC networks was examined by [78,79] while assuming that passive eavesdroppers were present.
It is shown in [80,81] that combining MEC with NOMA may avoid time-consuming delays and use less energy. The researchers of [82] also looked at the utilization of uplink and downlink NOMA in MEC structures. The investigators produced investigative outcomes to show how effectively adopting NOMA may decrease the interruption and power usage for MEC discharge. The new emphasis on NOMA and MEC working together is an additional essential communication approach for usage in upcoming wireless networks. The authors of [83] looked at a MEC system that uses NOMA for activity and results downloading while improving communication powers, transmission, time distribution, and work divesting to decrease data consumption. Additionally, [84] combined methods to reduce the total user latency. The authors of [85] adapted multi-antenna NOMA to multi-user MEC systems and considered partial and binary offload situations.
Inspired by the advantages of NOMA, substantial studies have been devoted to improving the efficiency of MEC in wireless networks by using NOMA approaches. According to a review of the relevant works, the effectiveness of NOMA-enabled MEC has not been exhaustively examined in various manifold client 6G radiocommunication deployment scenarios. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy of NOMA-enabled MEC expertise utilizing the THz channel for 6G communication. In addition, existing work does not assess the effectiveness of NOMA-centered MEC in a 6G connection employing a THz medium, considering the varying device powers.
In this SLR paper, we compare the effectiveness of NOMA-centered MEC systems concerning various key performance parameters, such as resource allocation, power allocation, energy efficiency, dynamic resource allocation, computational efficiency, and computational offloading, for 6G communication deployment scenarios in communities.
With a focus on incorporating two concepts relating to NOMA and MEC structures and their utilization in 6G networks, we propose an SLR on NOMA-enabled MEC in this study. NOMA-MEC has emerged as an exciting innovation capable of supporting the growing need for rapid, low-latency, and reliable mobile communication connections. Yet, the implementation of NOMA-MEC connections confronts numerous tactical and technological obstacles. To establish and implement effective and sustainable NOMA-MEC relationships, it is essential to comprehend the present phase of the investigation to recognize the main difficulties and possibilities.
This investigation is an SLR that concentrates on the present situation regarding MEC connections enabled by NOMA NOMA-MEC connections are an intriguing innovation capable of meeting the rising need for fast, low-latency, and dependable 6G mobile communication systems.
Therefore, the primary objective of this SLR on NOMA-enabled MEC connections is to present an in-depth knowledge of existing present-day studies conducted in this field of study. This SLR aims to recognize NOMA-MEC connection gaps in analysis, advantages, and limitations in the current body of research. The study specifically addresses this issue by examining and responding to the following research questions in the areas that are underlined:
  • What strategies, methods, and approaches have scholars recommended to enhance the operational efficiency of NOMA-MEC connections?
  • What are the gaps in knowledge, advantages, and limitations regarding NOMA-MEC connections in the published literature?
  • What are the primary obstacles and possibilities associated with creating and implementing NOMA-MEC in 6G connections?
  • What are the prospective areas of investigation for creating and implementing NOMA-MEC connections that are economical and sustainable?
In summary, this survey aims to deliver a thorough knowledge of the present state of study on NOMA-MEC in 6G connections and to recognize the difficulties and possibilities associated with the potential creation and implementation of effective and sustainable mobile communication systems.
To address the RQs mentioned above, the SLR is conducted using a standardized and thorough PRISMA approach (Supplementary Materials). The procedure involves establishing the RQs, undertaking a planned search for pertinent literature, evaluating and choosing the research articles according to established inclusion and exclusion requirements, and then assessing the selected studies employing an established collection of data method.
Scientists, entrepreneurs, and governments concerned with creating and implementing effective and sustainable 6G mobile communication structures can benefit from the findings of this investigation.
NOMA-MEC in 6G communications can contribute in the following ways to sustainability.
  • NOMA-MEC provides cost-effective and adaptable resource distribution in 6G networks, facilitating many users’ concurrent utilization of the same resources. This leads to a greater effective application of resources and may lower energy consumption, contributing to sustainability.
  • NOMA-MEC may encourage the implementation of edge computing, which allows the consideration of data closer to its origination. This may minimize the quantity of data that must be conveyed over vast distances, thereby reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions related to the transfer of information.
  • NOMA-MEC can aid in the establishment of intelligent and environmentally friendly communities. NOMA-MEC may facilitate the creation of applications such as smart transportation, smart energy management, and smart waste management that enhance the sustainability of communities by promoting the effective utilization of resources and peripheral computing.
  • NOMA-MEC in 6G connectivity can help achieve sustainability by promoting effective resource utilisation, minimizing energy consumption, promoting periphery computing, and aiding the establishment of intelligent and sustainable cities.
The rest of this paper is pre-structured; thus, Section 2 discusses the literature relating to the study. The resources and procedures employed for this survey are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 presents the findings and discussion, including answering the research questions formulated earlier in the study. The study was concluded with upcoming investigations recommended in Section 5.

2. Related Works

Numerous research studies have been conducted on NOMA, MEC, and 6G communications. To our knowledge, however, a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on NOMA-based mobile edge computing in 6G communications has not been done.
Basnayake et al. [86] completed a thorough categorization analysis of research in the power and code domains on NOMA-related energy-saving solutions. They also considered developing plans to use cutting-edge methods to increase the energy efficiency of current green NOMA programs. Finally, they determined upcoming difficulties and strategies for an energy-efficient NOMA since NOMA has been identified as a critical technology for fifth-generation wireless (5G) networks.
Reddy, Mannem, and Jamal [87] primarily investigate the implementation of NOMA structures on software-defined radio (SDR) schemes. This investigation thoroughly evaluates NOMA’s origins, current developments, and potential future research areas. Mathematical analysis is presented for several successive interference cancellations (SIC) receivers, including the ideal SIC recipient, the symbol-level SIC receiver, and the codeword-level SIC receiver.
Shahraki et al. [88] thoroughly investigated 6G networks. They examined the 6G networks’ utilization, essential services, enabling technology, and upcoming difficulties. They started by talking about the demand for 6G networks. The following section discusses prospective 6G demands, trends, and current 6G-related research initiatives, such as B. Touch Internet and terahertz (THz). There will also be presentations of applications, new services, important enabling technologies, and key performance metrics for 6G networks. Finally, several possibly unsolved difficulties for upcoming 6G networks are also given.
Liu et al. [89] investigated the evolution of Next Generation Multiple Access (NGMA), focusing particularly on the change from NOMA to NGMA. Specifically, the authors explore many potential candidate approaches after first addressing the essential capability restrictions of NOMA and outlining the innovative specifications for NGMA. We also offer a summary of existing investigation exertions on multi-antenna procedures for NOMA, possible upcoming utilization situations of NOMA, and the interaction amid NOMA and further upcoming physical layer approaches in light of the increased compatibility and litheness of NOMA. In addition, we talk about sophisticated mathematical techniques for NOMA communication design.
Yazid et al. [90] thoroughly analysed the most important research papers on UAV technology utilization connected to MEC-allowed or aided networks. It discusses how new IoT applications might benefit from the UAV-enabled MEC architecture and how DL and ML play a part in overcoming different restrictions like latency, task shifting, energy requirements, and security.
After reviewing these surveys, our contribution will focus on analysing resource and power allocation, latency, energy consumption, and the allocation of computing and energy-saving resources while also suggesting a more effective allocation of resources and energy. In summary, we concentrate on the present methods, unanswered issues, and future areas of study for NOMA-enabled MECs in 6G communications. Additionally, we will offer suggestions for researchers who want to do this type of research. The literature relating to this survey reviewed is abridged in Table 1.
It was deduced from the literature review that many authors did not follow the systematic literature review procedure, which involves using the PRISMA method for a thorough investigation. Hence, in this study, we have proposed to consider the SLR using the PRISMA method to analyse the articles for the study.

3. Materials and Methods

This analysis used the Preferred Reporting Items for the PRISMA technique to assess the existing evidence [91,92]. We also integrated our research with the acknowledged IT-related SLR design criteria. The following subsections summarise the procedures employed to investigate this survey, the selection criteria, information sources, search strategy, decision-making process, and content analysis.

3.1. Eligibility Criteria and Information Source

The justifications provided in the research publications and the criteria listed in Table 2 were contrasted. Relevant papers use search terms like NOMA, mobile edge computing, soft computing, and 6G in databases, including IEEE Xplore, Scopus, SpringerLink, Wiley Online Library, and Web of Science. We aim to provide you with a choice of results utilizing a range of general phrases and various search term combinations.

3.2. Selection Process

The time frame for the search is January 2010 through September 2022. In this phase, 8335 records in total were extracted. The analysis eliminated 356 records after removing duplicates. After the retrieved publications’ titles, abstracts, and keywords are evaluated in line with the suggestions made by the SLR framework [91,92], a total of 32 papers are selected. A forward referral was made to get more pertinent articles, which were retrieved. Once potentially relevant publications are founded on their titles, keywords, and abstracts, the full text of each journal is recovered and then further examined to decide eligibility. Forty-nine items are ultimately chosen for evaluation. Figure 1 depicts the selection procedure, which entails locating, selecting, and narrowing the list of research publications.

3.3. Data Extraction

The selection process is depicted in the Flow Diagram in Figure 1 and has considered the PRISMA standards [91]. The figure shows the many stages of the SLR, from the records identified to the final selection, including the articles included, omitted (and reasons), and additional documents discovered using alternative approaches.
We show the distribution of a few chosen works across several databases in Figure 2. Five (5) databases were searched for publications for this investigation. These include Web of Science, SpringerLink, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Wiley Online Library. The search term utilized in the study was “Soft Computing” OR “Mobile Edge Computing” AND “NOMA” (“6G System”). Figure 3 displays the distribution of the study’s paper publications between 2010 and 2022. Table 3 shows the total number of articles initially retrieved from each of the five databases. As the number of reports increased yearly in 2019, three articles were published and 2 published in 2020. The number of published articles increased in 2021 to eight, and in 2022, nineteen articles were published, meaning more research was conducted on NOMA-enabled MEC.

4. Results and Discussion

The findings of the conducted systematic literature review are covered in this section. Each of the research questions was also answered in this section.
In the Web of Science database from 2010 to 2022. Figure 3 displays the annual number of published papers that can be found and retrieved using the detailed criteria. The bar graph shows a gradual rise in the frequency of publications. The years 2022 and 2021 have the highest publications, clearly showing rising attention in the domain. This inclination was sustained in 2021, observing that this evaluation covers only the first eleven calendar month of the year 2022.
Only two publication outlets were considered in this SLR: journal and conference proceedings because two or more reviewers thoroughly reviewed the articles. Figure 4 shows the publications per outlet, and it was demonstrated that there are more publications in the journal outlet than in the conference. 27 (84.4%) articles were published in the journals, while 5 (15.6%) were published in the conference proceedings.
Figure 5 shows the journal publishers and the articles each published. It was demonstrated that IEEE in Manhattan, NY, USA published the highest report of 17, followed by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland, with five articles and Elsevier in Amsterdam with three. Springer in Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany published two articles, while Hindawi in Cairo, Egypt; Frontiers in Lausanne, Switzerland, IOP in Bristol, England, Wiley in Hoboken, NJ, USA, and Tech Science in Henderson, NV, USA all published one.
Table 4 provides a list of the extracted articles. All techniques used were found to be deep learning technologies. It summarizes the information that was taken from the relevant studies. The first column lists the author’s name, the year the paper was published, and the technology each contributor utilized. After the subject technology, the aims and contributions made by the research are described. Additionally, the table displayed responses to each research question in the final three columns on the right.
Table 4 also provides insights on the RQs examined, the methodology employed, the goals, and the contributions made from the study investigated from existing research. The breadth of technologies used by investigators in their various studies is shown in Table 4 by class for evaluated published articles.
Table 5 demonstrates the results of this investigation’s three research questions (RQ). RQ1 is on DL algorithms utilized to reduce computational overhead in NOMA-enabled MEC in a 6G network. RQ2 is on approaches employed to minimize transmission delay and lower complexity; finally, RQ3 is on the taxonomy of NOMA-based MEC used to address technologies in NOMA and MEC in 6G networks. Each piece of literature demonstrates the results of each of the RQs formulated in the study. It can be deduced that most of the literature provides answers to RQ1 and RQ3.
Combining power domain NOMA with a UFMC can address the high demands of 5G technology. NOMA uses energy-domain synchronization to accommodate many customers, whereas UFMC compensates for scheduling and bandwidth discrepancies. However, the high peak-to-average power (PAPR) problem associated with the multicarrier modulations of NOMA-UFMC waveform can negatively impact it, rendering it unsuitable for the next-generation mobile and wireless networks. Hence, 6G technology will improve the NOMA power-domain multiplexing, supporting many users, and the multicarrier modulations will be utilized well.
The cellular Internet of Things (IoT) is regarded as the de facto paradigm for enhancing the systems for processing and communication. Utilizing cellular networks, cellular IoT links a sizable number of real-world and virtual things to the Internet. The newest cellular networks, such as 5G, use cutting-edge and evolutionary technology to enhance wireless network performance significantly. However, in light of the anticipated new use cases, such as holographic communication and the IoT’s growing use of large smart-physical endpoints, the amount of network traffic has significantly increased, making it impossible for the present generation of mobile networks to satisfy the rising needs fully. Therefore, the next generation, 6G networks, is expected to be crucial in addressing these IoT concerns by offering uRLLC network capacity and new communication services.
Technically, it was observed from the literature reviewed and evaluated that some procedures, such as deep learning (DL), were adopted and utilized to reduce computational overhead in NOMA-enabled MEC in a 6G network. This is demonstrated in Table 6.

4.1. Benefits of NOMA for Edge Computing

NOMA and MEC are potential technologies for the next generation of wireless networks. With the rapid development of intelligent communication, mobile edge computing is increasingly applied to future contact, can increase the computing power of an application user, and can play a crucial role in virtual reality, augmented reality, unmanned driving, and similar domains. Unlike typical cloud computing systems, mobile edge computing may supply computational power in a cloud radio access network. For example, with a mobile edge computing server integrated with a base station, a user may offload computing chores to the mobile edge computing server placed at the network’s edge, which executes task computing. As the mobile edge computing server may be close to the user, a mobile edge computing network can provide the user with task computing services with low latency and energy usage. For moving edge computing, there are two modes of operation: the partial offload model and the binary offload model. In the partial offload approach, computational activities may be divided into two halves, one for local execution and the other for offloading to the mobile edge computing server. Under the binary offload approach, computational operations may be locally or completely offloaded to the mobile edge computing server. To address the ever-increasing data traffic, NOMA has been recognized as a vital technology for the upcoming generation of mobile communication networks. By employing superposition coding at the transmitter and successive interference cancellation at the receiver, NOMA can achieve higher spectral efficiency than traditional OMA techniques. If NOMA uplink, downlink transmission and mobile edge computing are integrated, latency and energy consumption may be greatly lowered by using NOMA mobile edge computation offload, a major improvement for enhancing the mobile user experience. Nonetheless, no technique or technological solution is presently developed in the prior art.
The technical configuration is as follows: To accomplish the objective mentioned above, the present invention employs the following technological solutions: The next stages constitute a technique for developing a NOMA-based mobile edge computing system:
  • establishing a system model wherein the system comprises two users and a base station equipped with a MEC server; the users and the base station are both fitted with a single antenna, and information transmission is carried out on the uplink in a NOMA mode, a wireless channel adopts a frequency non-selective quasi-static block fading model, the channel state is maintained unchanged in a selected given transmission block period, and the duration is limited, and 2. transmitting information over the upline
  • getting the signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio of user m and user n at aa base station according to a NOMA model chosen by an uplink
  • obtaining the information transmission rate condition of each user under the worst circumstance based on the safety transmission requirement;
  • defining the safety interruption probability to observe the communication effectiveness of the whole system during the transmission process; creating an expression of the transmission interruption likelihood of the entire connections based on the results of steps (2) and (3); and deducing the result.

4.2. Unresolved Issues and Future Directions

As stated in the article, NOMA-based MEC technologies have a lot of benefits, yet they also have many shortcomings, such as short battery life, high energy consumption, unfair workload offloading and resource allocation, restrictive latency constraints, and security issues. In this part, the problems associated with the unresolved issues are emphasized. Furthermore, the potential areas for future study to solve the problems presented are highlighted. This research also suggests new application scenarios that show the range of NOMA-based MEC solutions. The unresolved issues and future directions are presented in Table 7.

4.3. Research Challenges and Future Trends

Although the NOMA system is generally recognized as one of the most important multiple access strategies for 5G and beyond, many unresolved difficulties must be investigated to advance the NOMA system’s implementation. As a consequence, this part examines prospects for resolving NOMA’s research challenges and provides a short overview of some of NOMA’s research concerns.
  • NOMA with faulty CSI: The present analysis of the NOMA system assumes a perfect CSI to execute multi-user SIC at the user receiver or resource distribution at the base station (BS) [124,125,126,127]. In addition, this assumption cannot be implemented practically inside the NOMA system. Thus, real-time channel estimate errors occur in NOMA systems. Therefore, the NOMA system’s theoretical analysis should address channel estimation errors and incorrect CSI. Hence, improved approaches and algorithms are necessary for actual NOMA systems to get an optimum channel estimate [128,129,130,131].
  • Imperfect SIC implementation: Due to incorrect extraction and discovery, there is an increase in time and residual intrusion of previously recognized users during actual SIC operations [131,132,133,134,135]. This results in error propagation inside the SIC receiver (i.e., an imperfect SIC receiver) and decreases the performance of the NOMA system. So, for a successful SIC implementation, it is necessary to construct hardware devices that minimize processing complexity, reduce latency time, and improve NOMA performance. Hence, effective methods for performing the SIC process are developed in the uplink and downlink NOMA systems [136,137,138,139].
  • A heterogeneous network (HetNet) is a wireless network that uses several network topologies and operating systems [140]. Also, it has nodes with varied transmission capabilities and coverage regions. By incorporating tiny cells within the coverage of macrocells, the HetNet may reduce the energy consumption of future wireless networks and improve user QoS [31,32,33,34]. Real-time NOMA allows networks of different sorts to exchange resources. In cooperative communication, NOMA-based HetNet improves downlink coverage substantially [36,37,38,39,40]. In HetNets, it is recommended to employ effective heterogeneous suitable communication techniques using NOMA to reduce interference issues and accomplish spectrum splitting since there is mutual interference between numerous users and a limited spectrum resource. In light of this, several studies [41,42,43,44,45] must build an effective NOMA-based HetNet.
  • NOMA in millimetre wave (mm-Wave) communication: Millimeter-wave (mm-wave) communications and the NOMA technology are essential for meeting the high data rate requirements of 5G and beyond [141,142,143,144]. NOMA approaches become increasingly interesting at mmWave frequencies since the mmWave band is fundamentally suitable for multi-Gbps 5G wireless technologies. In addition, NOMA approaches may boost data transfer speeds while supporting multiple user connections [145,146,147,148] Despite its promise, the use of NOMA in mmWave communications is still in its infancy and applicable in various circumstances, including IoT and cloud-assisted vehicle systems. Hence, the NOMA in mm-wave communications proposes developing 5G technologies with high data rate wireless access [149,150,151,152,153].
  • Visible light communication (VLC)-based NOMA: Independent of mmWave communications, Visible Light Communication (VLC) has attracted great attention from the standpoint of excellent spectrum resources [154,155,156,157]. The VLC supports several characteristics, including a high data rate, high security, eye safety, license-free broad bandwidth, absence of electromagnetic interference, and low energy usage [158,159,160]. In addition, the VLC employs random data signals to power light-emitting diodes (LEDs) rather than the incandescent and fluorescent lights used by traditional light senders. Thus, the VLC is an excellent strategy for 5G networks and beyond. Moreover, the NOMA system may improve the performance of the VLC system. Hence, further study must be conducted on the NOMA VLC system to make VLC-based NOMA advantageous in many situations and places [161,162].
  • Mobile edge computing (MEC) based on NOMA is one of the 5G technology’s enabling technologies [163,164,165]. MEC technology allows user equipment (UEs) to conduct compute-intensive tasks by creating computing capabilities at the network edge and inside wireless access networks. In addition, NOMA systems allow several UEs to share the same resources [166,167,168]. Consequently, combining the NOMA system with MEC technology has several advantages, including decreased energy usage, enhanced EE and SE, and a rise in corporate UEs. To solve big data processing in future 5G wireless networks, it is necessary to recommend a NOMA-based MEC in multiple studies [169,170,171].
  • Practical realization of more than two-user pairing: The primary characteristic of the NOMA system is that it serves multiple users with the same resource. Nevertheless, most practical studies use a two-user pairing technique to facilitate the channel gains of two-paired users at the base station and implement effective SIC at receivers. As the need for connected devices such as IoT, machine-to-machine (M2M), and massive machine-type communications increases, new ways for multi-user pairing are also essential. These methods for pairing multiple users must take full use of NOMA. Hence, multi-user pairing strategies enhance the mass connection necessary for the next wireless network.
  • Hybrid NOMA: Integrating hundreds of millions of gadgets via an underlying BS gets challenging due to restricted orthogonal substances with exceptionally reduced-latency mobile communication in situations of minimal SNR. Therefore, the NOMA strategy is inappropriate for this circumstance [171,172,173,174,175]. To overcome this issue, an integrated MA that relies on a combination of NOMA and OMA approaches offers an improved approach to linking massive equipment in IoT settings, D2D and M2M connections, etc. For MA, a combination of NOMA uses both PD-NOMA and CD-NOMA. Additionally, the combined NOMA provides a higher SE than both NOMA and OMA. As a result, the hybrid NOMA can switch between NOMA and OMA modes of operation and can be utilized in various experiments [176,177].
  • Internet of Things and MIMO-NOMA: IoT, which represents the interconnection of all things, constitutes one of the main components of 6G connectivity. For cellphone IoT, the amalgamation of immense MIMO and NOMA is employed to simplify the integration of many IoT gadgets with a small radio bandwidth [178,179,180,181]. Immense MIMO-NOMA provides excellent transmission effectiveness and system adaptability to support many gadgets with a simple system architecture, which is beneficial for IoT technologies employing affordable, minimal-power, and minimal-complexity gadgets. To show the effects of MIMO-NOMA on IoT demand fulfilment, novel techniques with an optimal multiple-purpose architecture are essential [182,183,184].

4.4. Limitation of the Study

Owing to the consideration of just English-language research, the selected search terms, and repository restrictions, it is possible that certain relevant papers were missed regardless of the thorough search throughout databases. Valuable data can be obtained in non-peer-reviewed papers, unpublished term papers, and dissertation studies.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we took into account NOMA interoperability with MEC. We summarized the significant aspects and technologies used by the many publications featured in the survey and gave a comprehensive overview of NOMA-enabled MEC. Furthermore, we pinpoint important unresolved issues and the accompanying directions for further investigation. The combination of NOMA and MEC will be a game-changer as we approach the generation of future 6G and B6G technologies, offering a potent approach that can influence 6G and B6G’s performance characteristics, including latency, connection density, data rate, energy efficiency, and mobility. In the future, we intend to provide solutions to the resolved issues presented.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su15097315/s1. A database containing additional information on the PRISMA method checklist used in the systematic literature review is accessible online at [91]: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7867236.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.O.O.; methodology, R.O.O.; validation, J.B.A. and C.-T.L.; formal analysis, R.O.O.; investigation, R.O.O., J.B.A., A.T.A., C.-C.L. and A.B.A.; resources, A.L.I., A.T.A. and A.B.A.; data curation, R.O.O. and S.N.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.O.O.; writing—review and editing, J.B.A.; visualization, S.N.S., A.B.A., C.-T.L. and C.-C.L.; supervision, R.O.O.; project administration, R.O.O. and A.L.I.; funding acquisition, A.L.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, R.O.C., under contract no.: NSTC 110-2410-H-165-001-MY2. The work of Agbotiname Lucky Imoize is supported by the Nigerian Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF), the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), through the Nigerian-German Postgraduate Program under grant 57473408.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data are used and available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Imoize, A.L.; Adedeji, O.; Tandiya, N.; Shetty, S. 6G enabled smart infrastructure for a sustainable society: Opportunities, challenges, and research roadmap. Sensors 2021, 21, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saad, W.; Bennis, M.; Chen, M. A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Imoize, A.L.; Obakhena, H.I.; Anyasi, F.I.; Sur, S.N. A Review of Energy Efficiency and Power Control Schemes in Ultra-Dense Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems for Sustainable 6G Wireless Communication. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ziegler, V.; Viswanathan, H.; Flinck, H.; Hoffmann, M.; Raisanen, V.; Hatonen, K. 6G Architecture to Connect the Worlds. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 173508–173520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akyildiz, I.F.; Kak, A.; Nie, S. 6G and Beyond: The Future of Wireless Communications Systems. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 133995–134030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, B.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, J.; Gu, Y. Resource Allocation in 5G IoV Architecture Based on SDN and Fog-Cloud Computing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 3832–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, L.; Ye, C.; Ding, Y.; Wang, P. Allocation of Centrally Switched Fault Current Limiters Enabled by 5G in Transmission System. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2020, 36, 3231–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lv, Z.; Kumar, N. Software defined solutions for sensors in 6G/IoE. Comput. Commun. 2020, 153, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Na, Z.; Liu, Y.; Shi, J.; Liu, C.; Gao, Z. UAV-Supported Clustered NOMA for 6G-Enabled Internet of Things: Trajectory Planning and Resource Allocation. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 15041–15048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Basar, E. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Based Index Modulation: A New Beyond MIMO Paradigm for 6G. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020, 68, 3187–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hashida, H.; Kawamoto, Y.; Kato, N. Intelligent reflecting surface placement optimization in air-ground communication networks toward 6G. IEEE Wireless Commun. 2020, 27, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, F.; Kawamoto, Y.; Kato, N.; Liu, J. Future Intelligent and Secure Vehicular Network Toward 6G: Machine-Learning Approaches. Proc. IEEE 2019, 108, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Kato, N. When Machine Learning Meets Privacy in 6G: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2694–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, W. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for 6G: Improving Trust between Human and Machine. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kato, N.; Mao, B.; Tang, F.; Kawamoto, Y.; Liu, J. Ten Challenges in Advancing Machine Learning Technologies toward 6G. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. She, C.; Dong, R.; Gu, Z.; Hou, Z.; Li, Y.; Hardjawana, W.; Yang, C.; Song, L.; Vucetic, B. Deep Learning for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications in 6G Networks. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Letaief, K.B.; Chen, W.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.-J.A. The Roadmap to 6G: AI Empowered Wireless Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2019, 57, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rodrigues, T.K.; Suto, K.; Kato, N. Edge Cloud Server Deployment with Transmission Power Control Through Machine Learning for 6G Internet of Things. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 2019, 9, 2099–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gustavsson, U.; Frenger, P.; Fager, C.; Eriksson, T.; Zirath, H.; Dielacher, F.; Studer, C.; Parssinen, A.; Correia, R.; Matos, J.N.; et al. Implementation Challenges and Opportunities in Beyond-5G and 6G Communication. IEEE J. Microwaves 2021, 1, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lv, Z.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Song, H. Cross-Layer Optimization for Industrial Internet of Things in Real Scene Digital Twins. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 15618–15629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arowolo, M.O.; Ogundokun, R.O.; Misra, S.; Oluranti, J.; Kadri, A.F. K-Nearest Neighbour Algorithm for Classi-Fication of IoT-Based Edge Computing Device. In Artificial Intelligence for Cloud and Edge Computing; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 161–179. [Google Scholar]
  22. Isabona, J.; Imoize, A.L.; Ojo, S.; Lee, C.-C.; Li, C.-T. Atmospheric Propagation Modelling for Terrestrial Radio Frequency Communication Links in a Tropical Wet and Dry Savanna Climate. Information 2022, 13, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Polese, M.; Jornet, J.M.; Melodia, T.; Zorzi, M. Toward End-to-End, Full-Stack 6G Terahertz Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ding, Z.; Fan, P.; Poor, H.V. Impact of user pairing on 5G nonorthogonal multiple-access downlink transmissions. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2015, 65, 6010–6023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vaezi, M.; Schober, R.; Ding, Z.; Poor, H.V. Non-orthogonal multiple access: Common myths and critical questions. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2019, 26, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cao, K.; Wang, B.; Ding, H.; Lv, L.; Dong, R.; Cheng, T.; Gong, F. Improving Physical Layer Security of Uplink NOMA via Energy Harvesting Jammers. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2020, 16, 786–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cao, K.; Wang, B.; Ding, H.; Lv, L.; Tian, J.; Hu, H.; Gong, F. Achieving Reliable and Secure Communications in Wireless-Powered NOMA Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 1978–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kiani, A.; Ansari, N. Edge Computing Aware NOMA for 5G Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Y.; Ni, K.; Zhang, C.; Qian, L.P.; Tsang, D.H.K. NOMA-Assisted Multi-Access Mobile Edge Computing: A Joint Optimization of Computation Offloading and Time Allocation. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2018, 67, 12244–12258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, Y.; Qin, B.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, J.; Ji, Y. A Novel Spatio-Temporal Synchronization Method of Roadside Asynchronous MMW Radar-Camera for Sensor Fusion. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 22278–22289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, H.; Dai, X.; Xiao, Z.; Iyengar, A.K. Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation for Energy-Constrained Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, B.; Li, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Rong, Y.; Zhang, R. 3D Trajectory Optimization for Energy-Efficient UAV Communication: A Control Design Perspective. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 21, 4579–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alamu, O.; Gbenga-Ilori, A.; Adelabu, M.; Imoize, A.; Ladipo, O. Energy efficiency techniques in ultra-dense wireless heterogeneous networks: An overview and outlook. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2020, 23, 1308–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jin, Y.; Hu, Z.; Xie, D.; Wu, G.; Zhou, L. Physical layer security transmission scheme based on artificial noise in cooperative SWIPT NOMA system. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2021, 2021, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, Z.; Tang, J.; Zhang, X.Y.; So, D.K.C.; Jin, S.; Wong, K.-K. Hybrid Evolutionary-Based Sparse Channel Estimation for IRS-Assisted mmWave MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 21, 1586–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wei, Z.; Yuan, J.; Ng DW, K.; Elkashlan, M.; Ding, Z. A survey of downlink non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G wireless communication networks. ZTE Commun. 2016, 14, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  37. Xue, J.; An, Y. Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation for Multi-Task Multi-Server NOMA-MEC Networks. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 16152–16163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wan, Z.; Xu, D.; Xu, D.; Ahmad, I. Joint computation offloading and resource allocation for NOMA-based multi-access mobile edge computing systems. Comput. Netw. 2021, 196, 108256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dong, X.; Li, X.; Yue, X.; Xiang, W. Performance analysis of cooperative NOMA based intelligent mobile edge computing system. China Commun. 2020, 17, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saito, Y.; Kishiyama, Y.; Benjebbour, A.; Nakamura, T.; Li, A.; Higuchi, K. Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Cellular Future Radio Access. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Dresden, Germany, 2–5 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ding, Z.; Yang, Z.; Fan, P.; Poor, H.V. On the Performance of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in 5G Systems with Randomly Deployed Users. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2014, 21, 1501–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, Z.; Ding, Z.; Dai, X.; Zhang, R. A mathematical proof of the superiority of NOMA compared to conventional OMA. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1612.01069. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gaballa, M.; Abbod, M.; Aldallal, A. A Study on the Impact of Integrating Reinforcement Learning for Channel Prediction and Power Allocation Scheme in MISO-NOMA System. Sensors 2023, 23, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Salameh, H.B.; Abdel-Razeq, S.; Al-Obiedollah, H. Integration of Cognitive Radio Technology in NOMA-Based B5G Networks: State of the Art, Challenges, and Enabling Technologies. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 12949–12962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Al-Dulaimi, O.M.K.; Al-Dulaimi, A.M.K.; Alexandra, M.O.; Al-Dulaimi, M.K.H. Strategy for Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access and Performance in 5G and 6G Networks. Sensors 2023, 23, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Aldababsa, M. Performance of TAS/MRC in NOMA energy harvesting relay networks. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2023, 162, 154569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ding, Z.; Liu, Y.; Choi, J.; Sun, Q.; Elkashlan, M.; Chih-Lin, I.; Poor, H.V. Application of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in LTE and 5G Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Di, B.; Song, L.; Li, Y. Sub-Channel Assignment, Power Allocation, and User Scheduling for Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2016, 15, 7686–7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhiqiang, W.; Jinhong, Y.; Ng, D.W.K.; Elkashlan, M.; Zhiguo, D. A survey of downlink non-orthogonal multiple access for 5g wireless communication networks. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1609.01856. [Google Scholar]
  50. Alnoman, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Ejaz, W.; Anpalagan, A. Emerging edge computing technologies for distributed IoT systems. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Abiodun, M.K.; Awotunde, J.B.; Ogundokun, R.O.; Adeniyi, E.A.; Arowolo, M.O. Security and information assurance for IoT-based big data. In Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security: Methods, Issues and Possible Horizons or Opportunities; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 189–211. [Google Scholar]
  52. Awotunde, J.B.; Ijaz, M.F.; Bhoi, A.K.; AbdulRaheem, M.; Oladipo, I.D.; Barsocchi, P. Edge-IoMT-based enabled architecture for the smart healthcare system. In 5G IoT and Edge Computing for Smart Healthcare; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  53. AbdulRaheem, M.; Oladipo, I.D.; González-Briones, A.; Awotunde, J.B.; Tomori, A.R.; Jimoh, R.G. An efficient, lightweight speck technique for edge-IoT-based smart healthcare systems. In 5G IoT and Edge Computing for Smart Healthcare; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 139–162. [Google Scholar]
  54. Dai, X.; Xiao, Z.; Jiang, H.; Alazab, M.; Lui, J.C.S.; Dustdar, S.; Liu, J. Task Co-Offloading for D2D-Assisted Mobile Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 19, 480–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Obakhena, H.I.; Imoize, A.L.; Anyasi, F.I.; Kavitha, K.V. Application of cell-free massive MIMO in 5G and beyond 5G wireless networks: A survey. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2021, 68, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mao, Y.; You, C.; Zhang, J.; Huang, K.; Letaief, K.B. A survey on mobile edge computing: The communication perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 2322–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Pham, Q.V.; Fang, F.; Ha, V.N.; Piran, M.J.; Le, M.; Le, L.B.; Hwang, W.-J.; Ding, Z. A survey of multi-access edge computing in 5G and beyond: Fundamentals, technology integration, and state-of-the-art. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 116974–117017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Santos, J.; Wauters, T.; Volckaert, B.; De Turck, F. Towards low-latency service delivery in a continuum of virtual re-sources: State-of-the-art and research directions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 2557–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, B.; Zhang, M.; Rong, Y.; Han, Z. Transceiver Optimization for Wireless Powered Time-Division Duplex MU-MIMO Systems: Non-Robust and Robust Designs. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 21, 4594–4607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lv, Z.; Qiao, L.; Nowak, R. Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation of Wireless Energy Transfer for the Internet of Everything in Digital Twins. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2022, 60, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, Z.; Xu, G.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Q. Performance Analysis of the Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Network with Opportunistic Scheduling Over Generalized Fading Channels. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 2914–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, H.; Ota, K.; Dong, M. Learning IoT in Edge: Deep Learning for the Internet of Things with Edge Computing. IEEE Netw. 2018, 32, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lim, W.Y.B.; Luong, N.C.; Hoang, D.T.; Jiao, Y.; Liang, Y.-C.; Yang, Q.; Niyato, D.; Miao, C. Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2031–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ding, Z.; Schober, R.; Poor, H.V. No-Pain No-Gain: DRL Assisted Optimization in Energy-Constrained CR-NOMA Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 69, 5917–5932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cao, K.; Ding, H.; Wang, B.; Lv, L.; Tian, J.; Wei, Q.; Gong, F. Enhancing Physical-Layer Security for IoT with Nonorthogonal Multiple Access Assisted Semi-Grant-Free Transmission. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 24669–24681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Elbayoumi, M.; Kamel, M.; Hamouda, W.; Youssef, A. NOMA-Assisted Machine-Type Communications in UDN: State-of-the-Art and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 1276–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Maraqa, O.; Rajasekaran, A.S.; Al-Ahmadi, S.; Yanikomeroglu, H.; Sait, S.M. A Survey of Rate-Optimal Power Domain NOMA With Enabling Technologies of Future Wireless Networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2192–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ding, Z.; Fan, P.; Poor, H.V. Impact of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access on the Offloading of Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018, 67, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Pham, Q.-V.; Nguyen, T.H.; Han, Z.; Hwang, W.-J. Coalitional Games for Computation Offloading in NOMA-Enabled Multi-Access Edge Computing. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 69, 1982–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, F. NOMA-aided mobile edge computing via user cooperation. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020, 68, 2221–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lai, X.; Yang, B.; Ma, B.; Liu, M.; Yin, Z.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. An Improved Stereo Matching Algorithm Based on Joint Similarity Measure and Adaptive Weights. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, J.; Gao, F.; Jia, W.; Yuan, W.; Jin, W. Integrated Sensing and Communications for UAV Communications with Jittering Effect. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2023, 12, 758–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guo, C.; Ye, C.; Ding, Y.; Wang, P. A Multi-State Model for Transmission System Resilience Enhancement Against Short-Circuit Faults Caused by Extreme Weather Events. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2020, 36, 2374–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sheng, M.; Dai, Y.; Liu, J.; Cheng, N.; Shen, X.; Yang, Q. Delay-Aware Computation Offloading in NOMA MEC Under Differentiated Uploading Delay. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 2813–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lv, Z.; Chen, D.; Feng, H.; Zhu, H.; Lv, H. Digital Twins in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Rapid Medical Resource Delivery in Epidemics. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 25106–25114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dai, X.; Xiao, Z.; Jiang, H.; Lui, J.C. UAV-Assisted Task Offloading in Vehicular Edge Computing Networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ren, Y.; Jiang, H.; Feng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, R.; Yu, H. ACP-Based Modeling of the Parallel Vehicular Crowd Sensing System: Framework, Components and an Application Example. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2022, 8, 1536–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Qian, L.; Wu, W.; Lu, W.; Wu, Y.; Lin, B.; Quek, T.Q. Secrecy-based energy-efficient mobile edge computing via coop-erative non-orthogonal multiple access transmission. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 69, 4659–4677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, B.; Wu, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, H. Security Enhancement With a Hybrid Cooperative NOMA Scheme for MEC System. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 2635–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, F.; Xu, J.; Ding, Z. Optimized Multiuser Computation Offloading with Multi-Antenna NOMA. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Singapore, 4–8 December 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jiang, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, M.; Zhao, N.; Wu, M. A new adaptive co-site broadband interference cancellation method with auxiliary channel. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Su, B.; Ni, Q.; Yu, W.; Pervaiz, H. Optimizing computation efficiency for NOMA-assisted mobile edge computing with user cooperation. IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw. 2021, 5, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pan, Y.; Chen, M.; Yang, Z.; Huang, N.; Shikh-Bahaei, M. Energy- efficient NOMA-based mobile edge computing offloading. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2019, 23, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Briscoe, B.; Brunstrom, A.; Petlund, A.; Hayes, D.; Ros, D.; Tsang, J.; Welzl, M. Reducing internet latency: A survey of techniques and their merits. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 18, 2149–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Wang, F.; Xu, J.; Ding, Z. Multi-antenna NOMA for computation offloading in multiuser mobile edge computing systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019, 67, 2450–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Basnayake, V.; Jayakody, D.N.K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, N.; Muthuchidambaranathan, P.; Mabed, H. A New Green Prospective of Non-orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for 5G. Information 2020, 11, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Reddy, B.S.K.; Mannem, K.; Jamal, K. Software Defined Radio Based Non-orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) Systems. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 119, 1251–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shahraki, A.; Abbasi, M.; Piran, M.; Taherkordi, A. A comprehensive survey on 6G networks: Applications, core services, enabling technologies, and future challenges. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.12475. [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Mu, X.; Ding, Z.; Schober, R.; Al-Dhahir, N.; Hossain, E.; Shen, X. Evolution of NOMA Toward Next Generation Multiple Access (NGMA) for 6G. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2022, 40, 1037–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yazid, Y.; Ez-Zazi, I.; Guerrero-González, A.; El Oualkadi, A.; Arioua, M. UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge-Computing for IoT Based on AI: A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2021, 5, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Moher, D.; Lalu, M.M.; Chou, R.; Li, T.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ogundokun, R.O.; Misra, S.; Maskeliunas, R.; Damasevicius, R. A Review on Federated Learning and Machine Learning Approaches: Categorization, Application Areas, and Blockchain Technology. Information 2022, 13, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rahim, N.A.; Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Khyam, M.O.; He, J.; Pesch, D.; Moessner, K.; Saad, W.; Poor, H.V. 6G for Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communications: Enabling Technologies, Challenges, and Opportunities. Proc. IEEE 2022, 110, 712–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jiao, J.; He, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Q. Intelligent Hybrid Non-orthogonal Multiple Access Relaying for Vehicular Net-works in 6G. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 14773–14786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abozariba, R.; Naeem, M.K.; Patwary, M.; Seyedebrahimi, M.; Bull, P.; Aneiba, A. NOMA-based resource alloca-tion and mobility enhancement framework for IoT in next-generation cellular networks. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 29158–29172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tuong, V.D.; Truong, T.P.; Nguyena, T.-V.; Noh, W.; Cho, S. Partial Computation Offloading in NOMA-Assisted Mobile-Edge Computing Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 13196–13208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bai, W.; Yao, T.; Zhang, H.; Leung, V.C.M. Research on Channel Power Allocation of Fog Wireless Access Network Based on NOMA. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 32867–32873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wu, J.; Tan, B.; Wu, J.; Wang, M. Video multicast: Integrating scalability of soft video delivery systems into NO-MA. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2019, 8, 1722–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, H.; Fang, F.; Ding, Z. DRL-Assisted Resource Allocation for NOMA-MEC Offloading with Hybrid SIC. Entropy 2021, 23, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dursun, Y.; Fang, F.; Ding, Z. Hybrid NOMA-based MIMO offloading for mobile edge computing in 6G net-works. China Commun. 2022, 19, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Peng, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, K. Clustered NOMA-based downlink adaptive relay coordinated transmission scheme for future 6G cell-free edge network. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2022, 15, 612–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jain, P.; Gupta, A.; Kumar, N.; Joshi, G.P.; Cho, W. Performance Evaluation of Cooperative OMA and NOMA Systems in 6G Deployment Scenarios. Sensors 2022, 22, 3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cheng, Z.; Liwang, M.; Chen, N.; Huang, L.; Du, X.; Guizani, M. Deep reinforcement learning-based joint task and energy offloading in UAV-aided 6G intelligent edge networks. Comput. Commun. 2022, 192, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sayyari, R.; Pourrostam, J.; Ahmadi, H. Efficient PAPR reduction scheme for OFDM-NOMA systems based on DSI & precoding methods. Phys. Commun. 2021, 47, 101372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shahjalal, M.; Kim, W.; Khalid, W.; Moon, S.; Khan, M.; Liu, S.; Lim, S.; Kim, E.; Yun, D.-W.; Lee, J.; et al. Enabling technologies for AI empowered 6G massive radio access networks. ICT Express 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Bian, X.; Cheng, Y.; Xiang, S. A Resource Allocation Scheme for Real-Time Energy-Aware Offloading in Vehicular Networks with MEC. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022, 2022, 8138079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Huang, H.; Yang, Y.; Ding, Z.; Wang, H.; Sari, H.; Adachi, F. Deep learning-based sum data rate and energy efficiency optimization for MIMO-NOMA systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 19, 5373–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Douch, S.; Abid, M.R.; Zine-Dine, K.; Bouzidi, D.; Benhaddou, D. Edge computing technology enablers: A systematic lecture study. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 69264–69302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guo, C.; Li, H. Application of 5G network combined with AI robots in personalized nursing in China: A literature review. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 948303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, M.; Quek, T.Q.S. Joint Content Caching, Recommendation, and Transmission Optimization for Next Generation Multiple Access Networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2022, 40, 1600–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Truong, T.P.; Tran, A.-T.; Nguyen, T.M.T.; Nguyen, T.-V.; Masood, A.; Cho, S. MEC-Enhanced Aerial Serving Networks via HAP: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Jeju-si, Republic of Korea, 12–15 January 2022; pp. 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mounir, M.; El Mashade, M.B.; Aboshosha, A.M.; Youssef, M.I. Impact of HPA nonlinearity on the performance of power domain OFDM-NOMA system. Eng. Res. Express 2022, 4, 025004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, J.; Shang, Y.; Qin, M.; Yang, Q.; Cheng, N.; Gao, W.; Kwak, K.S. Multiobjective Oriented Task Scheduling in Heterogeneous Mobile Edge Computing Networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 8955–8966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chen, H.-C.; Widodo, A.M.; Lin, J.C.-W.; Weng, C.-E. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Aided Cooperative NOMA with p-CSI Fading Channel toward 6G-Based IoT System. Sensors 2022, 22, 7664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rahman, H.; Sejan, M.A.S.; Yoo, S.-G.; Kim, M.-A.; You, Y.-H.; Song, H.-K. Multi-User Joint Detection Using Bi-Directional Deep Neural Network Framework in NOMA-OFDM System. Sensors 2022, 22, 6994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jia, J.; Xu, Y.; Du, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. Joint resource allocation for QoE optimization in large-scale NOMA-enabled multi-cell networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2022, 15, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Du, S. Resource allocation algorithm for MEC based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference (IPCCC), Austin, TX, USA, 29–31 October 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  118. Song, L.; Hu, X.; Zhang, G.; Spachos, P.; Plataniotis, K.N.; Wu, H. Networking Systems of AI: On the Convergence of Computing and Communications. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 20352–20381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jha, K.; Gupta, A.; Alabdulatif, A.; Tanwar, S.; Safirescu, C.O.; Mihaltan, T.C. CSVAG: Optimizing Vertical Handoff Using Hybrid Cuckoo Search and Genetic Algorithm-Based Approaches. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Attanasio, B.; La Corte, A.; Scatá, M. Syncing a Smart City within an Evolutionary Dynamical Cooperative Environment. In Proceedings of the 2020 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE), Turin, Italy, 18–20 November 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sarieddeen, H.; Abdallah, A.; Mansour, M.M.; Alouini, M.-S.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y. Terahertz-Band MIMO-NOMA: Adaptive Superposition Coding and Subspace Detection. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2021, 2, 2628–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bhattacharya, P.; Bodkhe, U.; Zuhair, M.; Rashid, M.; Liu, X.; Verma, A.; Kishan Dewangan, R. The amalgamation of blockchain and sixth-generation-envisioned responsive edge orchestration in future cellular vehicle-to-anything ecosystems: Opportunities and challenges. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2021, e4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cengiz, K.; Baig, I.; Chakravarty, S.; Kumar, A.; Albreem, M.A.; Alsharif, M.H.; Uthansakul, P.; Nebhen, J.; Aly, A.A. Power Domain Multiplexing Waveform for 5G Wireless Networks. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 70, 2083–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zamani, M.R.; Eslami, M.; Khorramizadeh, M.; Ding, Z. Energy-Efficient Power Allocation for NOMA With Imperfect CSI. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2018, 68, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Duy, H.; Dengy, Y.; Xueyz, J.; Mengyz, D.; Zhaoy, Q.; Xuy, Z. Robust Online CSI Estimation in a Complex Environment. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 21, 8322–8336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Fang, F.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Leung, V.C. Energy-efficient resource scheduling for NOMA systems with imperfect channel state information. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Paris, France, 21–25 May 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fang, F.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Roy, S.; Leung, V.C.M. Joint User Scheduling and Power Allocation Optimization for Energy-Efficient NOMA Systems With Imperfect CSI. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017, 35, 2874–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Guo, F.; Zhou, W.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, C. Path extension similarity link prediction method based on matrix algebra in directed networks. Comput. Commun. 2022, 187, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Long, K.; Nallanathan, A.; Leung, V.C.M. Resource Allocation for Energy Efficient NOMA UAV Network under Imperfect CSI. In Proceedings of the ICC 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland, 7–11 June 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fang, F.; Wang, K.; Ding, Z.; Leung, V.C.M. Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for NOMA-MEC Networks With Imperfect CSI. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 69, 3436–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Manglayev, T.; Kizilirmak, R.C.; Kho, Y.H.; Bazhayev, N.; Lebedev, I. NOMA with imperfect SIC implementation. In Proceedings of the IEEE EUROCON 2017—17th International Conference on Smart Technologies, Ohrid, North Macedonia, 6–8 July 2017; pp. 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Liu, M.; Song, T.; Gui, G. Deep Cognitive Perspective: Resource Allocation for NOMA-Based Heterogeneous IoT With Imperfect SIC. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 6, 2885–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Liu, M.; Song, T.; Zhang, L.; Gui, G. Resource Allocation for NOMA based Heterogeneous IoT with Imperfect SIC: A Deep Learning Method. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Bologna, Italy, 9–12 September 2018; pp. 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nguyen, T.-D.; Phan, V.-C.; Truong, P.Q. Energy Efficient Performance Analysis of NOMA for Wireless Down-link in Heterogeneous Networks under Imperfect SIC. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), Dong Hoi, Vietnam, 20–21 July 2019; pp. 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lu, C.; Zhou, H.; Li, L.; Yang, A.; Xu, C.; Ou, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Tian, F. Split-core magnetoelectric current sensor and wireless current measurement application. Measurement 2021, 188, 110527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Do, D.-T.; Le, T.A.; Nguyen, T.N.; Li, X.; Rabie, K.M. Joint Impacts of Imperfect CSI and Imperfect SIC in Cognitive Radio-Assisted NOMA-V2X Communications. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 128629–128645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Do, D.-T.; Le, A.-T.; Lee, B.M. NOMA in Cooperative Underlay Cognitive Radio Networks Under Imperfect SIC. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 86180–86195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, D.; Cao, Z.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, S.; Xiao, Z.; Zeng, F. Concurrent Low-power Listening: A New Design Paradigm for Duty-cycling Communication. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 2022, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Fang, F.; Cheng, J.; Ding, Z. Joint Energy Efficient Subchannel and Power Optimization for a Downlink NOMA Heterogeneous Network. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2018, 68, 1351–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Li, Q.-K.; Lin, H.; Tan, X.; Du, S. H Consensus for Multiagent-Based Supply Chain Systems Under Switching Topology and Uncertain Demands. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Syst. 2018, 50, 4905–4918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhou, F.; Wu, Y.; Hu, R.Q.; Wang, Y.; Wong, K.K. Energy-Efficient NOMA Enabled Heterogeneous Cloud Radio Access Networks. IEEE Netw. 2018, 32, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Long, K.; Li, W.; Jiang, M.; Lu, J. Non-Cooperative Game-Based Power Allocation for Energy-Efficient NOMA Heterogeneous Network. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 49596–49609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Elhattab, M.; Arfaoui, M.-A.; Assi, C. CoMP Transmission in Downlink NOMA-Based Heterogeneous Cloud Radio Access Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2020, 68, 7779–7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cao, B.; Fan, S.; Zhao, J.; Tian, S.; Zheng, Z.; Yan, Y.; Yang, P. Large-Scale Many-Objective Deployment Optimization of Edge Servers. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 3841–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Moltafet, M.; Azmi, P.; Javan, M.R.; Mokari, N.; Mokdad, A. Optimal radio resource allocation to achieve a low BER in PD-NOMA–based heterogeneous cellular networks. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2019, 30, e3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Niasar, F.A.; Momen, A.R.; Hosseini, S.A. A novel approach to fairness-aware energy efficiency in green heterogeneous cellular networks. Wirel. Netw. 2022, 28, 2651–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Nikjoo, F.; Mirzaei, A.; Mohajer, A. A Novel Approach to Efficient Resource Allocation in NOMA Heterogeneous Networks: Multi-Criteria Green Resource Management. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2018, 32, 583–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Mohajer, A.; Sorouri, F.; Mirzaei, A.; Ziaeddini, A.; Rad, K.J.; Bavaghar, M. Energy-Aware Hierarchical Resource Management and Backhaul Traffic Optimization in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks. IEEE Syst. J. 2022, 16, 5188–5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Cao, B.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Zhao, J.; Cao, W.; Lv, Z. Many-Objective Deployment Optimization for a Drone-Assisted Camera Network. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2021, 8, 2756–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fletscher, L.A.; Suarez, L.A.; Grace, D.; Peroni, C.V.; Maestre, J.M. Energy-Aware Resource Management in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks With Hybrid Energy Sources. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2018, 16, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Liu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, G.; Zhang, H. Resource Management of Heterogeneous Cellular Networks With Hybrid Energy Supplies: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 20, 4392–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Khan, H.Z.; Ali, M.; Naeem, M.; Rashid, I.; Mumtaz, S.; Khan, A.A.; Akhtar, A.N. Secure resource management in beyond 5G heterogeneous networks with decoupled access. Ad Hoc Netw. 2021, 125, 102737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Chandra, K.; Marcano, A.S.; Mumtaz, S.; Prasad, R.V.; Christiansen, H.L. Unveiling Capacity Gains in Ultradense Networks: Using mm-Wave NOMA. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2018, 13, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Xiao, Z.; Zhu, L.; Gao, Z.; Wu, D.O.; Xia, X.-G. User Fairness Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Millimeter-Wave Communications With Analog Beamforming. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2019, 18, 3411–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wang, K.; Cui, J.; Ding, Z.; Fan, P. Stackelberg Game for User Clustering and Power Allocation in Millimeter Wave-NOMA Systems. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2019, 18, 2842–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Khaled, I.; Langlais, C.; El Falou, A.; Jezequel, M.; ElHasssan, B. Joint SDMA and Power-Domain NOMA System for Multi-User Mm-Wave Communications. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), Limassol, Cyprus, 15–19 June 2020; pp. 1112–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Attaoui, W.; Elbiaze, H.; Sabir, E. Joint Beam Alignment and Power Allocation for Multi-User NOMA-mm Wave Systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th 5G World Forum (5GWF), Montreal, QC, Canada, 13–15 October 2021; pp. 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Chen, C.; Zhong, W.-D.; Yang, H.; Du, P. On the Performance of MIMO-NOMA-Based Visible Light Communication Systems. IEEE Photon- Technol. Lett. 2017, 30, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, F.; Luo, Y.; Hu, R.Q. BER Analysis of NOMA-Enabled Visible Light Communication Systems With Different Modulations. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 10807–10821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tahira, Z.; Asif, H.M.; Khan, A.A.; Baig, S.; Mumtaz, S.; Al-Rubaye, S. Optimization of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Based Visible Light Communication Systems. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2019, 23, 1365–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Jha, M.K.; Kumar, N.; Lakshmi, Y.V.S. Performance of Zero-Biased NOMA VLC System. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), Bangalore, India, 10–12 September 2020; pp. 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Jin, J.; Lu, H.; Wang, J. An experimental study of NOMA in underwater visible light communication system. Opt. Commun. 2020, 475, 126199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Cao, X.; Liu, C.; Peng, M. Energy-Efficient Mobile Edge Computing in NOMA-Based Wireless Networks: A Game Theory Approach. In Proceedings of the ICC 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland, 7–11 June 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Yılmaz, S.S.; Özbek, B. Multi-helper NOMA for cooperative mobile edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2021, 23, 9819–9828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Xu, C.; Zheng, G.; Tang, L. Energy-Aware User Association for NOMA-Based Mobile Edge Computing Using Matching-Coalition Game. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 61943–61955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Du, J.; Liu, W.; Lu, G.; Jiang, J.; Zhai, D.; Yu, F.R.; Ding, Z. When Mobile-Edge Computing (MEC) Meets Nonorthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for the Internet of Things (IoT): System Design and Optimization. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 7849–7862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Mohajer, A.; Daliri, M.S.; Mirzaei, A.; Ziaeddini, A.; Nabipour, M.; Bavaghar, M. Heterogeneous Computational Resource Allocation for NOMA: Toward Green Mobile Edge-Computing Systems. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2022, 16, 1225–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Meng, A.; Wei, G.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, X.; Yang, Z. Green resource allocation for mobile edge computing. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, X.; Liu, J. Energy-Efficient Allocation for Multiple Tasks in Mobile Edge Computing. J. Cloud Comput. 2021, 11, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Li, Y.; Xu, G.; Ge, J.; Liu, P.; Fu, X. Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for Application Including Dependent Tasks in Mobile Edge Computing. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 2422–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, K.; Liang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Z.; Ding, Z. User Clustering and Power Allocation for Hybrid Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 12052–12065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Suganuma, H.; Suenaga, H.; Maehara, F. Hybrid Multiple Access Using Simultaneously NOMA and OMA. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS), Taipei, Taiwan, 3–6 December 2019; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Giang, H.T.H.; Hoan, T.N.K.; Thanh, P.D.; Koo, I. Hybrid NOMA/OMA-Based Dynamic Power Allocation Scheme Using Deep Reinforcement Learning in 5G Networks. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Lamba, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, S.K. Power allocation for downlink multiuser hybrid NOMA-OMA systems: An auction game approach. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2020, 33, e4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. You, H.; Pan, Z.; Liu, N.; You, X. User Clustering Scheme for Downlink Hybrid NOMA Systems Based on Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 129461–129468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Deka, K.; Sharma, S. Hybrid NOMA for Future Radio Access: Design, Potentials and Limitations. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 123, 3755–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Rahman, T.; Khan, F.; Khan, I.; Ullah, N.; Althobaiti, M.M.; Alassery, F. NOMA and OMA-Based Massive MIMO and Clustering Algorithms for Beyond 5G IoT Networks. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021, 2021, 6522089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhang, J.; Fan, J.; Zhang, J.; Ng, D.W.K.; Sun, Q.; Ai, B. Performance Analysis and Optimization of NOMA-Based Cell-Free Massive MIMO for IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 9, 9625–9639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Shen, R.; Xu, Y. User Clustering and Power Allocation for mm Wave MIMO-NOMA with IoT devices. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Nanjing, China, 29 March–1 April 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, S.; Sheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, D.; Shen, J.; Chen, R. Blockchain-Empowered Distributed Multi-Camera Multi-Target Tracking in Edge Computing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Fu, Y.; Li, C.; Yu, F.R.; Luan, T.H.; Zhao, P.; Liu, S. A Survey of Blockchain and Intelligent Networking for the Metaverse. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 10, 3587–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Deng, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, L.; Qin, J. Secure beamforming design in MIMO NOMA networks for Internet of Things with perfect and imperfect CSI. Comput. Netw. 2021, 187, 107839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Liu, M.; Gu, Q.; Yang, B.; Yin, Z.; Liu, S.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. Kinematics Model Optimization Algorithm for Six Degrees of Freedom Parallel Platform. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Rajak, S.; Selvaprabhu, P.; Chinnadurai, S.; Hosen, A.S.; Saad, A.; Tolba, A. Energy efficient MIMO–NOMA aided IoT network in B5G communications. Comput. Netw. 2022, 216, 109250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Systematic Review Paper Selection Process.
Figure 1. Systematic Review Paper Selection Process.
Sustainability 15 07315 g001
Figure 2. The database and the articles retrieved.
Figure 2. The database and the articles retrieved.
Sustainability 15 07315 g002
Figure 3. Number of printed documents per year.
Figure 3. Number of printed documents per year.
Sustainability 15 07315 g003
Figure 4. Publications per outlets.
Figure 4. Publications per outlets.
Sustainability 15 07315 g004
Figure 5. Publishers and Articles published.
Figure 5. Publishers and Articles published.
Sustainability 15 07315 g005
Table 1. summarizes the various related literature reviewed.
Table 1. summarizes the various related literature reviewed.
AuthorsObjectivesLimitations
Basnayake et al. [86]The authors completed a thorough categorization analysis of research in the power and code domains on NOMA-related energy-saving solutions. They gave a comprehensive review of the origins of NOMA.The review was limited to only NOMA technology, and the study did consider the SLR process.
Reddy, Mannem, and Jamal [87]The authors primarily investigate the execution of NOMA systems on software-defined radio (SDR) platforms.The study did not consider the process of SLR.
Shahraki et al. [88]The authors performed a thorough investigation of 6G networks. They examined the 6G networks’ applications, essential services, enabling technology, and upcoming difficulties.Their review was just limited to the 6G communication network.
Liu et al. [89]The scholars examined the evolution of Next Generation Multiple Access (NGMA), focusing particularly on the change from Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) to NGMA.They did not conduct an SLR review process or consider MEC technology in their study.
Yazid et al. [90]The authors thoroughly analysed the important papers on UAV technology utilization connected to MEC-allowed or aided architectures. They only considered UAV and MEC technologies and also, and they didn’t follow the SLR procedure.
Table 2. Inclusion and Exclusion Standards.
Table 2. Inclusion and Exclusion Standards.
CriteriaJustification
The analysis requires to be carried out on an investigative articleThe study focuses on publications from peer-reviewed journals and conferences to ensure the selected publications are of exceptional eminence.
The study was required to be published as a full-length paper.A brief article typically lacks a strong evidence and cannot cover all the specifics of the suggested solution.
The study’s papers have to be written in English.The language of communication among the researchers who carried out this SLR is English.
Publications must be pertinent to certain topics, like engineering.The research in this article is not concentrated on any other topics.
Articles that were published between 2010 and 2022To collect all relevant field-related data
Table 3. The database and the papers initially retrieved.
Table 3. The database and the papers initially retrieved.
DatabaseArticles
IEEE972
Scopus174
Springer55
Web of Science7119
Wiley Online Library15
Total8335
Table 4. Analysis of the retrieved and included articles.
Table 4. Analysis of the retrieved and included articles.
AuthorsTechnologyObjectivesContributionRQ1RQ2RQ3
Noor-A-Rahim et al. [93]6G for V2X (vehicle to everything)This article discusses the scientific and technological advancements that could affect future 6G vehicle-to-everything (6G-V2X) telecommunications.The authors discuss innovations like new materials, methods, and system architectures. Yes
Ding, Schober, Poor [64]NOMA and Multi-user MEC networkIt was suggested to use a universal hybrid NOMA-MEC offloading strategy.The authors developed a multi-objective optimization problem and a low-complexity resource allocation strategy to reduce the energy used for MEC offloading.Yes Yes
Jiao et al. [94]NOMA, 6G, and Vehicular networkThe authors suggest a hybrid intelligent non-orthogonal forwarding system (UN) multiple access (NOMA) for next-generation millimetre-bandwidth (mmWave) end-edge cloud vehicle systems, which principally consist of the high-throughput satellite (HTS), edge-founded station (BS), and end-vehicle nodes.The authors introduced an expectation minimization-based power allocation approach and an iterative power allocation methodology. YesYes
Abozariba et al. [95]NOMA, IoT, Cellular networksThe authors of this paper offer a methodology for constructing intelligent systems that will efficiently measure and supply radio resources to IoT gadgets.With a guaranteed bit rate (GBR) and non-GBR, the researchers’ method gives IoT facility providers cost estimates to optimize their spectrum procurement and deliver the required quality of service. Yes
Tuong et al. [96]MEC, NOMA, 6GThe authors’ goal is to make computations easier (weighted sum of consumed energy and latency)The authors proposed the ACDQN deep reinforcement learning algorithm, which combines the benefits of actor-critic and deep Q-network approaches while being simple to implement.YesYes
Bai et al. [97]NOMA, Radio access network (RAN), Fog access nodeNOMA is designed to disengage between clients whose data is multiplexed from various power factors within its orthogonal source. The subsequent interference suppression (SIC) detects information at fog access nodesThe investigation findings indicate that the I-FTPA outperforms the previous FPA and FTPA approaches. Yes
Wu et al. [98]NOMA, Medium-grain quality scalable, Video codingThe researcher suggests a multicast solution that is scalable and is influenced by soft video delivery systems.The researchers suggest a scheme with a soft-encrypted augmented layer and a digitalized base layer. The problem of power distribution is presented as one of distortion minimization. Yes
Li, Fang, and Ding [99]Multi-access edge computing, NOMA, OMA, 6GThe experiment findings show that the I-FTPA outperforms the prior FPA and FTPA in terms of performance.The authors developed a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based approach to deliver a user grouping strategy that is practically perfect.YesYes
Dursun, Fang, and Ding [100]NOMA, MIMO, MECThe authors want to increase the spectrum proficiency, energy proficiency, and data throughput of MEC offloading by minimizing communication interruption in the MIMO-MEC.The delay minimization issue is resolved using the generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD) approach and the Dinkelbach transform. Yes
Peng, Yuan & Zhang [101]Clustered NOMA, Cell-free edge network, 6GThis research aims to provide a downlink adjustable reflector synchronized distribution system that relies on clustered NOMA for a future 6G cell-free edge network.The findings showed that the suggested method might offer customers a higher cumulative data rate than the immediate broadcast method, the decode-and-forward (DF) method, and the relays amplify-and-forward (AF) method. Yes
Jain et al. [102]NOMA, OMAThis study compared the effectiveness of NOMA and OMA structures in a single-cell setting with randomly dispersed cellular operators while taking cooperative relays into account for increased system dependability.The outcomes proved that the NOMA structure beats the OMA structure in performance.Yes
Cheng et al. [103]Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, Edge network, intelligence, Fog computing nodeThey proposed a combined task and energy offloading issue under an intelligent edge network with UAV assistance and energy constraints, comprising a high-altitude platform (HAP), several UAVs, and on-ground fog computing nodes (FCNs).To overcome the issue previously identified, the authors suggest a multiple-agent soft actor-critic (MASAC) founded solution. Numerical simulation results demonstrate the superiority of our recommended strategy compared to benchmark approaches.YesYes
Sayyari, Pourrostam, and Ahmadi [104]Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, NOMAPrecoding and dummy sequence insertion (DSI) techniques are recommended to overcome the earlier restrictions to reduce PAPR. A brand-new way for creating mock arrangements is also developed for the suggested strategy.Regarding PAPR reduction and BER performance, the authors demonstrate that the suggested approach performs better than precoding and PTS-based alternatives. Yes
Shahjalal et al. [105]RAN, 6GThe paper focuses on the requirements-compliant intelligent massive RAN (mRAN) architecture and essential technologies.The researchers look at potential AI solutions for network and resource administration problems in 6G mRAN. Lastly, discuss the 6G network architecture’s physical layer intelligence and edge technology research challenges.Yes Yes
Zhang et al. [106]Vehicular application, MEC, vehicle usersAn immediate electricity-aware contracting approach powered by MEC has been suggested for automobile systems to effectively utilize connectivity and computing capabilities, decrease electricity use, and mitigate interruptions.Based on the computational findings, the suggested bi-level optimizing technique minimizes the entire burden by roughly 40% compared to a comparable method. YesYes
Huang et al. [107]MIMO, NOMA, communication deep neural network (CDNN)The authors provide a MIMO-NOMA structure for increasing total data throughput and energy proficiency based on deep learning.The CDNN framework uses training algorithms to handle the power allocation issue to increase MIMO-data NOMA’s throughput and energy efficiency.YesYes
Douch et al. [108]Edge computing, Multi-access edge computing, 5GThis study provides a comprehensive, in-depth, and well-organized evaluation of edge computing and its supporting technologies.Future worries about green energy and standards were highlighted with edge computing. YesYes
Guo and Li [109]5G network, AI, Cloud computing, and big dataThe following paper describes the health-related uses of 5G internet innovations involving telecare, virtual healthcare emergencies, and utilization of virtual automation.This publication’s authors investigate the development and health-related uses of 5G internet technologies. Yes
Fu et al. [110]NOMATo lessen the average scheme’s latency, the scholars use a proactive behaviour-shaping approach called suggestion in cache-assisted NOMA structures.The study findings show that, when measured against extensive benchmark procedures, the proposed joint optimization strategy benefits from the system latency and the ratio of cache hits. YesYes
Truong et al. [111]MEC, UAV, Deep reinforcement learning (DRL)The scholars presented a paradigm for a MEC-improved aerial providing infrastructure in which aerial vehicles—drones, UAVs, etc.—fly in the air to provide services to remote places without terrestrial base stations.They formulate a deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG)-a based method called HAMEC to address the issue identified in the literature using a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework.Yes Yes
Mounir et al. [112]NOMA, Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, This paper employs the most common soft limiter (SL) technique with input back-off (IBO) as a valuable regulating measure.The feasible data rate for users, the total rate capacity, the system’s fairness, and the bit error rate (BER) of each operator are all considered while analyzing the effectiveness of the OFDM-NOMA structure in the existence of nonlinear falsification in both UL and DL. Yes
Li et al. [113]MEC, 6G networkThe authors examine a multiobjective task scheduling issue in a 6G network with MEC support.A DAG-based task scheduling problem is addressed with the improved multiobjective cuckoo search (IMOCS) method to decrease UE execution delay and energy usage.YesYesYes
Chen et al. [114]NOMA, Single in, Single out (SISO), 6G technology, reconfigurable intelligence surface (RIS)The authors considered the handling effectiveness and ergodic capability of a cooperative NOMA of an IoT structure.Simulation results indicate that RIS-aided NOMA has a reduced outage risk compared to conventional NOMA.YesYes
Rahman et al. [115]NOMA, OFDM, Bi-Directional Deep Neural NetworkA DNN with bi-directional Bi-LSTM is suggested for multiple access uplink channel estimate (CE) and frequency identification of the first frequency band.The suggested strategy is suitable for 5G wireless communication because it enhances the signal-to-noise ratio and symbol-error rate.YesYes
Jia et al. [116]NOMA, 6G communication, Artificial bee colony (ABC)The paper suggests using a genetic algorithm (GA) for UE-BS association, assigning SCs, and allocating power using an artificial bee colony (ABC) approach.The implementation outcomes establish that the suggested power allocation structure may rapidly reach the best result and that increasing the number of operators and SCs can raise the MOS.YesYesYes
Wang et al. [117]MEC, Visual reality, 6GThe authors build an offloading computing system for IoT devices on the principles of reinforcement learning.Numerous implementation outcomes revealed that the RAPG could accomplish the optimum allocation rate between the BS and local and lower the inclusive structure interruption of job combinations with the least energy use. YesYes
Song et al. [118]AI, Networkng systems AI (NSAI)The researcher’s objective is to present an in-depth summary of the scheme framework, essential pieces of machinery, utilization situations, obstacles, and prospects of NSAI, which can give insight into the telecoms and AI computing industries’ next advancements.They provide a cohesive structure for the intense union of computation and infrastructures, allowing for combined optimization of the network and applications/services as a single integrated system.Yes Yes
Jha et al. [119]Cuckoo search (CS) and genetic algorithm (GA)The study develops an innovative amalgam of CS and GA to increase throughput, reduce delay in heterogeneous wireless systems to their highest possible levels, and minimise handover failure probability.The performance of the suggested method is encouraging for applications where it is necessary to regulate frequent handoffs and enhance handoff procedures to reduce core network power usage even more.YesYesYes
Attanasio, Corte, and Scata [120]MEC, IoT, Smart citiesThey put out a theoretical strategy to look into a more in-depth understanding of the city’s structure and to reveal unobserved urban trends.The topic of MEC node cooperation in a multi-service environment is investigated using evolutionary game theory, revealing insight into the combined effect of its dynamics and the multiplex structure on reducing the blocking likelihood of the MEC nodes. YesYes
Sadieddeen et al. [121]NOMA, MIMO, Ultra massiveTo improve channel conditions, the authors of this work offer spatial tuning techniques that modify antenna subarray topologies.A proposed architectural design demonstrates complexity reductions and approximate bit error rate (BER) formulae. YesYes
Bhattacharya et al. [122]5G, vehicular users, blockchain, C-V2XThe authors suggested effective 5G REC infrastructures for end users who drive vehicles (VU)The suggested study serves as a roadmap for researchers, academics, and automotive stakeholders as they further investigate the numerous integration prospects. Yes
Cengiz et al. [123]5G wireless network, NOMA, UFMCThis study attempts to provide a distinct Hartley transform (DHT) pre-coding-founded NOMA-assisted universal filter multicarrier (DHT-NOMA-UFMC) waveform structure to mitigate the excessive PAPR.Due to power sector multiplexing on the broadband internet connection, the recommended method has a significant content gain advantage over the current 5G waveforms. Yes
Table 5. Category-wise data for reviewed research articles.
Table 5. Category-wise data for reviewed research articles.
ReferenceResource AllocationPower AllocationEnergy EfficiencyDynamic Resource AllocationComputational EfficiencyComputation Offloading
Noor-A-Rahim [93]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Ding et al. [64]YesNoYesNoNoNo
Jiao et al. [94]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Abozariba et al. [95]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Tuong et al. [96]NoNoNoNoNoYes
Bai et al. [97]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Wu et al. [98]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Li, Fang, and Ding [99]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Dursun, Fang, and Ding [100]NoNoYesNoNoNo
Peng, Yuan & Zhang [101]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Jain [102]NoNoYesNoNoNo
Cheng et al. [103]NoNoYesNoNoYes
Sayyari, Pourrostam and Ahmadi [104]NoNoNoNoYesNo
Shaljalal et al. [105]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Zhang et al. [106]YesNoNoNoNoYes
Huang et al. [107]NoYesYesNoNoNo
Douch et al. [108]YesNoNoNoNoYes
Guo and Li [109]NoNoNoNoNoNo
Fu et al. [110]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Truong et al. [111]NoNoNoNoNoYes
Mounir et al. [112]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Li et al. [113]NoNoYesNoNoNo
Chen et al. [114]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Rahman et al. [115]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Jia et al. [116]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Wang et al. [117]NoNoYesNoNoYes
Song et al. [118]NoNoNoNoNoYes
Jha et al. [119]NoNoYesNoYesNo
Attanasio, Corte, and Scata [120]XNoNoNoNoNo
Sadieddeen et al. [121]NoYesNoNoNoNo
Bhattacharya et al. [122]NoNoNoNoNoNo
Cengiz et al. [123]YesNoNoNoNoNo
Table 6. Summary of Literatures Reviewed and Analysed.
Table 6. Summary of Literatures Reviewed and Analysed.
AuthorsMethodsContributions
Ding, Xu, Schober & Poor [64]Iteration power allocation algorithm and PREM algorithmsThe simulation results demonstrate that their suggested algorithms may approach the exhaustive search strategy and outperform the current optimum NOMA methods. In addition, they exploit the impacts of the number of moving end VNs, which may provide directions for constructing the future vehicular network.
Truong et al. [96]Deep reinforcement learning algorithm named ACDQNThe suggested strategy is demonstrated to achieve its optimal value with a computational overhead of approximately 10%, 27% and 69% lower than existing methods.
Li, Fang, and Ding [99]Deep reinforcement learning (DRL)In addition, by attaining the shuttered-form approach to the matter of resource apportionment issue, we ideally reduced the offloading energy consumption. The suggested procedure was completed rapidly based on modelling findings, and the NOMA-MEC strategy performed better than the prevailing OMA schemes.
Jain et al. [102]Signal-to-interference noise-ratio It is shown by numerical findings that the NOMA scheme outperforms the OMA system.
Cheng et al. [103]Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) algorithm, MASAC-based approach, and MADDPG frameworkResults from numerical simulations demonstrate that our suggested strategy is superior to benchmark approaches.
Shahjalal et al. [104]Intelligent massive RAN (mRAN) architecturePrioritizing network intelligence, the authors provided a comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities of AI and ML techniques in network administration, assigning resources, bandwidth distribution, peripheral communication, and safety. In addition, they identified significant research difficulties and obstacles for each facet of 6G mRANs.
Huang et al. [107]Effective communication deep neural NetworkSimulation findings indicate that the suggested CDNN framework is a viable choice for improving the effectiveness of MIMO-NOMA in relation to power distribution, and thorough simulations demonstrate that it accomplishes an advanced cumulative data proportion and better energy proficiency than current solutions.
Truong et al. [111]Deep reinforcement learning (DRL), deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG)-based algorithm, named HAMECThe investigational findings indicate that HAMEC performed better than benchmark systems.
Li et al. [113]An improved multiobjective cuckoo search (IMOCS) algorithmSimulation findings indicate that the IMOCS algorithm beats four benchmark algorithms, providing the ideal workload scheduling strategy for MEC servers in 6G networks.
Chen et al. [114]RIS-assisted downlink in a NOMA network with p-CSI across Nakagamim fading channels without direct connection situations.Based on experiment results without a direct link from the base, it has been observed that NOMA aided by RIS exhibits a low outage probability compared to traditional NOMA. Closed-form formulas calculated using Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the coverage probability of a remote user is higher than that of a local user.
Rahman et al. [115]Bi-directional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM)In the simulated results, the efficacy of the suggested model is evaluated to that of the convolutional neural network model and conventional CE schemes like MMSE and LS. It is demonstrated that the recommended technology offers attainable performance enhancements in terms of symbol-error rate and signal-to-noise ratio, making it appropriate for 5G wireless communication and beyond.
Jia et al. [116]Genetic algorithm (GA), SC assignment and artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm The implementation results indicate that the recommended power distribution procedure can swiftly unify to the most effective approach and that the MOS can be increased by boosting the range of customers and scheduling centres (SCs).
Song et al. [118]Networking systems of AI (NSAI)This paper’s contribution entails (1) offering an all-encompassing structure for the deep convergence of computing and communications, where the network and implementation can be collectively improved as one cohesive unit, and (2) suggesting the overall strategy and addressing open investigations in acknowledging the online-evolutionary convergence of the digital world, the natural environment, and society as a whole, towards the ubiquitous neurological systems (UBNs), which require cooperation in the functioning of the internet, the physical world, and society at large.
Jha et al. [119]Hybrid cuckoo search (CS) and genetic algorithm (GA)The hybrid approach presented boosts throughput by 17% and 8%, respectively, as likened to the cuckoo search and genetic algorithms employed separately. The efficiency of the suggested technique is encouraging for scenarios in which the handoff techniques must be tuned to regulate repeated handoffs to lower the power consumption of user equipment further.
Table 7. Summary of research issues and future research.
Table 7. Summary of research issues and future research.
Unresolved IssuesFuture Directions
We are optimizing resource allocation and offloading using NOMA and MECNOMA-based MEC founded smart city network architecture
Pricing Tactics and the Effects of user behaviour traitsTrust, privacy, and Openness with Blockchain Technology
Increasing capacity with multipath networking and multi-layer heterogeneous architectureMobility solution for smart agriculture
Content delivery with NOMA-based MECNOMA-based MEC: Aiding and using technology in Industry 6.0
Regulatory policies and StandardizationMobility solution for smart vehicular network
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ogundokun, R.O.; Awotunde, J.B.; Imoize, A.L.; Li, C.-T.; Abdulahi, A.T.; Adelodun, A.B.; Sur, S.N.; Lee, C.-C. Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Enabled Mobile Edge Computing in 6G Communications: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097315

AMA Style

Ogundokun RO, Awotunde JB, Imoize AL, Li C-T, Abdulahi AT, Adelodun AB, Sur SN, Lee C-C. Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Enabled Mobile Edge Computing in 6G Communications: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(9):7315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ogundokun, Roseline Oluwaseun, Joseph Bamidele Awotunde, Agbotiname Lucky Imoize, Chun-Ta Li, AbdulRahman Tosho Abdulahi, Abdulwasiu Bolakale Adelodun, Samarendra Nath Sur, and Cheng-Chi Lee. 2023. "Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Enabled Mobile Edge Computing in 6G Communications: A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 15, no. 9: 7315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop