Correction: Zemlyak et al. Measuring the Entrepreneurial Mindset: The Motivations behind the Behavioral Intentions of Starting a Sustainable Business. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15997

The authors would like to make the following corrections about the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:

Replacing the sentence in “Section 2.1. The Russian Innovation Parallax” in page 3:

The USSR had a strong insight that unless legal barriers to the transfer of knowledge were eliminated, it would not be able to catch up to the West. In order to conceptualize and practicalize this, they established a system of inventor’s certificates as a substitute for the patent system, as well as checks and balances against the clamp on prospective inventions, which contained extensive regulations on discoveries and exceptions to the patentability requirement. The Soviet Union’s intellectual and innovation system was shocked by its dissolution. The haphazard privatization that followed destroyed the established ties between R&D institutions and sustainable businesses. The rationale behind government-led innovation planning was rejected. The nation’s performance in terms of innovation declined. The idea of owning property rights in innovation has taken the place of the Soviet concept of unrestricted knowledge flow. It has been three decades since Russia made patents the exclusive legal framework for inventions.

with

The USSR had a strong insight that unless legal barriers to the transfer of knowledge were eliminated, it would not be able to catch up to the West [21]. In order to conceptualize and practicalize this, they established a system of inventor’s certificates as a substitute for the patent system, as well as checks and balances against the clamp on prospective inventions, which contained extensive regulations on discoveries and exceptions to the patentability requirement [21]. The Soviet Union’s intellectual and innovation system was shocked by its dissolution [21]. The haphazard privatization that followed destroyed the established ties between R&D institutions and sustainable businesses [21]. The rationale behind government-led innovation planning was rejected [21]. The nation’s performance in terms of innovation declined [21]. The idea of owning property rights in innovation has taken the place of the Soviet concept of unrestricted knowledge flow [21]. It has been three decades since Russia made patents the exclusive legal framework for inventions [21].

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.