Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study of Dynamic Responses of Special Tunnel Sections under Near-Fault Ground Motion
Next Article in Special Issue
Microplastic Accumulation in Agricultural Soils with Different Mulching Histories in Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Journal
Financial Well-Being in the United States: The Roles of Financial Literacy and Financial Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Responses of Vegetation, Soil, and Microbes and Carbon and Nitrogen Pools to Semiarid Grassland Land-Use Patterns in Duolun, Inner Mongolia, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Phosphate and Silicate Combined Application on Cadmium Form Changes in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil

1
College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
2
National Engineering Research Center for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, Shenyang 110866, China
3
Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in Northeast China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shenyang 110866, China
4
Liaoning Agricultural Technical College, Yingkou 115009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4503; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054503
Submission received: 15 January 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 2 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue BRICS Soil Management for Sustainable Agriculture)

Abstract

:
Pollution by heavy metal cadmium (Cd) in soil is still serious and control measures are constantly updated. In this paper, one indoor culture method was applied to investigate the effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on soil cadmium (Cd) speciation transformation. A total of 7 treatments were designed, which were: simulated cadmium-contaminated soil without phosphate and silicate recorded as the reference (CK) treatment; mixtures of 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% soil heavy dose of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine (potassium dihydrogen phosphate: thermo-activated nano serpentine ratio = 1:2) added to simulated cadmium-contaminated soil, denoted as nPS700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, and nPS700-2.0, respectively; and 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% soil heavy dose of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite mixture (potassium dihydrogen phosphate: thermo-activated nano zeolite ratio = 1:2) added to simulated cadmium-contaminated soil, denoted as nPF700-0.5, nPF700-1.0, and nPF700-2.0, respectively. The results showed that the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate with thermo-activated nano serpentine or potassium dihydrogen phosphate with thermo-activated nano zeolite reduced the soil exchangeable Cd content to varying degrees and increased levels of carbonate-bound, Fe-Mn oxide-bound, organic-bound, and residual Cd forms to different degrees. In combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate, the higher the dosage level, the greater the reduction of exchangeable Cd content and the better the effect on Cd-contaminated soil remediation: nPS700-2.0 > nPS700-1.0 > nPS700-0.5, nPF700-2.0 > nPF700-1.0 > nPF700-0.5 (N, P, S, and F represent nano, KH2PO4, serpentine, and zeolite, respectively, and 700 represents the activation temperature). At the same dosage level, the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine was more effective than that of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite in repairing Cd-contaminated soil (nPS700-2.0 > nPF700-2.0, nPS700-1.0 > nPF700-1.0, nPS700-0.5 > nPF700-0.5), which indicated that the combination of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate can passivate heavy metal cadmium (Cd) to a certain extent and promote the transformation of bioavailable Cd into an unusable state. The reason why potassium dihydrogen phosphate, zeolite, and serpentine can absorb heavy metal cadmium after entering the soil is because the silicate mineral itself can directly absorb cadmium. Second, after nano treatment and thermal activation, the specific surface areas and pores of the minerals increase, which enhances the adsorption performance. Third, because the pH value of the mineral itself is high, the pH value of the soil environment will rise, thereby transforming H2PO4 into PO43−, which is conducive to the adsorption of Cd2+.

1. Introduction

In June 2020, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the National Bureau of Statistics, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs jointly issued the “Second National Pollution Source Census Bulletin”, reporting that the lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), and arsenic (As) emissions in Chinese national water pollution in 2017 were 182.54 t, a large part of which entered the soil, causing heavy metal pollution. Among them, soil Cd pollution is one of the most intractable environmental problems in the world [1,2] because approximately 2.0% of Cd entering the environment enters the atmosphere, 4.0% enters the water, and up to 94.0% enters the soil [3]. Once Cd enters the soil, it is not easily decomposed and transformed, but it easily accumulates and has hidden, long-term, and irreversible effects. Heavy metal Cd causes different hazards to animals, plants, and humans, such as damage to plant roots, effects on animal reproduction, and damage to human renal tubules [4]. It has become a hot spot of environmental pollution research at home and abroad [5,6,7,8].
Nanomaterials and nanotechnologies are the most promising materials and technologies in the 21st century. Nanomaterials have the advantages of small particle size, large specific surface area, fast adsorption rate, strong reactivity, and have strong adsorption capacity for heavy metals [9,10,11], which makes up for the deficiency of traditional adsorbents. Generally speaking, the adsorption capacity of natural silicate minerals for heavy metals is limited [12]. Nano treatment can significantly improve the adsorption effect of heavy metals.
In-situ passivation chemical remediation technology is one of the most widely used methods to treat heavy metal pollution. Common remediation substances include phosphate (potassium dihydrogen phosphate, apatite, phosphate powder, etc.) and silicate minerals (serpentine, zeolite, etc.). Phosphate stabilizes heavy metals and is effective in the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Zeolite is an aluminosilicate mineral with a shelf-like structure that has been applied in the research field of heavy metal adsorption due to its large specific surface area, cation exchange capacity, and strong adsorption performance [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Serpentine has a high specific surface area, good pore structure, strong surface activity, and belongs to layered magnesium silicate minerals [29,30], which have been used in the study of heavy metal adsorption in water and soil [31,32,33,34,35].
The effects of single and mixed applications of phosphate and natural zeolite on the transformation of Cd forms in soil have been investigated in the laboratory. Research groups have studied the effects of natural and thermo-activated serpentine on the occurrence of cadmium forms in soil. Previous test results showed that the mixed application of phosphate and silicate had better adsorption effects on cadmium than the single application, and silicate had a better treatment effect on cadmium than phosphate [35,36]. The current study was designed after reviewing the literature and research performed by laboratory and research groups. The aim of the study was to determine the effects of silicate nano treatment and thermal activation combined with phosphate on the transformation of heavy metal cadmium forms in order to prevent and control heavy metal Cd pollution as well as provide more selectivity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

Tested soils: The soil samples were collected from 0–20 cm of uncontaminated farmland at the Scientific Research Base of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province. The soil type was brown soil. The soil samples were collected, naturally air dried, mixed, ground, screened using a 2 mm sieve, and stored in a Ziplock bag for further use. The basic physical and chemical properties of the tested soils were pH 5.71, organic matter 26.93 g·kg−1, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen 50.02 mg·kg−1, available phosphorus 71.27 mg·kg−1, available potassium 183.59 mg·k−1, total phosphorus 0.63 g·kg−1, and total cadmium 0.18 mg·kg−1, which determined to according to the methods of ref. [37].
Simulation of Cd-contaminated soil: 50.0 g of the experimental soil was accurately weighed into a clean jar, and CdCl2·2.5H2O (AR) was added to the test soil in the form of a solution, so that the exogenous Cd content in the soil reached 10 mg·kg−1 [38,39,40]. After the soil was fully mixed with the CdCl2·2.5H2O solution, it was cultivated at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) for one week, while the soil water content was maintained by weighing to 70% of the field water-holding capacity. Then, the treated soil was dried, ground, stored, and set aside.
The natural nano serpentine and nano zeolite tested were both collected from Liaoning Province. They were pulverized into 600 nm powder by high-energy nano impact grinding (highly dispersed, uniform particle size, basically controllable size), placed in a Ziplock bag, and stored in a desiccator for later use.
The composition and content of the tested soil, zeolite, and serpentine are shown in Table 1.
Thermo-activated nano serpentine: The 600 nm natural nano serpentine powder was put into a crucible and calcined in a muffle furnace at 700 °C for 2 h at constant temperature. After cooling to room temperature, the nano serpentine powder was removed, put in a Ziplock bag, and stored in a desiccator. The thermo-activated nano serpentine obtained was abbreviated as nST (N, nano treatment; S, serpentine; T, activation temperature), namely nS700, which stands for 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine.
Thermo-activated nano zeolite: The 600 nm natural nano zeolite powder was put into a crucible and calcined in a muffle furnace at 700 °C for 2 h at constant temperature. After cooling to room temperature, the nano zeolite powder was removed, put in a Ziplock bag, and stored in a desiccator. The thermo-activated nano zeolite obtained was abbreviated as nFT (N, nano treatment; S, zeolite; T, activation temperature), namely nF700, which stands for 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite.
Phosphate for testing: KH2PO4 (analytical reagent), denoted as P.
The combination of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine was recorded as nPS700, and the combination of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite was recorded as nPF700.

2.2. Experimental Design

In this experiment, the indoor culture method was adopted and a total of 7 treatments were designed. The ratio of phosphate and silicate in the different treatments is shown in Table 2. The treatment sets (each with 3 replicates) were: simulated cadmium-contaminated soil without phosphate and silicate as the reference (CK) treatment; mixtures of 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% soil heavy dose of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine (potassium dihydrogen phosphate: thermo-activated nano serpentine ratio = 1:2) added to simulated cadmium-contaminated soil, denoted as nPS700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, and nPS700-2.0, respectively; and 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% soil heavy dose of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite mixture (potassium dihydrogen phosphate: thermo-activated nano zeolite ratio = 1:2) added to simulated cadmium-contaminated soil, denoted as nPF700-0.5, nPF700-1.0, and nPF700-2.0, respectively. The mixtures were mixed well and then 50.0 g of each of the above-mentioned soils with different treatments was accurately weighed and put into jars. The jars were placed in a thermotank and cultivated at 25 ± 2 °C, and the soil water content was maintained at 70% of the field water-holding capacity by adding deionized water every other day, according to the weighing method. At the 0th, 7th, 14th, 28th, and 56th days of culture, appropriate amounts of naturally air-dried and ground soil samples were weighed, and the levels of five forms of soil Cd were determined using the Tessier five-step continuous extraction method.

2.3. Measurement Indicators and Methods

Analysis of the different morphological contents of cadmium in soil was carried out using the Tessier continuous extraction method [41]. The detailed operations are shown in Table 3. The content of cadmium in the soil was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS).

2.4. Data Processing and Analysis

Microsoft Excel 2003 and origin 8.0 software were used to analyze and graph the data, and both the data significance tests and correlation analysis were performed using SPSS version 17.0 statistical software (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Analysis

The biotoxicity of heavy metals in soil is not only related to their total amount, but also depends mainly on the form in which they are present and the proportion of each form [42,43,44,45,46]. The Tessier five-step sequential extraction method for the determination of heavy metal Cd forms used in this experiment yields five forms, namely exchangeable (EXE), carbonate-bound (CAB), organic-bound (OM), iron-manganese oxide-bound (FMO), and residual (RES) Cd.

3.1. Effect of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Application on the Exchangeable Cd Content in Soil

The change in EXE Cd content in soil with different dosages of potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine and 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite is shown in Figure 1. As can be seen from the figure, with increasing culture time under the same treatment, the soil EXE Cd content decreased slightly. Although the degree of decrease was not very obvious, the effect was more significant than the CK treatment. Compared with 0 d, after 56 d, the EXE Cd content of soil treated with CK decreased by 0.37, and the EXE Cd content of soil treated with nPS700–0.5, nPS700-1.0, and nPS700-2.0 respectively decreased by 1.26, 1.55, and 1.91 units, and the EXE Cd content of soil treated with nPF700-0.5, nPF700-1.0, and nPF700-2.0 decreased by 1.13, 1.38, and 1.70 units, in turn. For the same dose level and different culture times, the EXE Cd content of soil decreased significantly when treated with potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine compared with potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite; the nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments decreased the EXE Cd content significantly and the nPS700-2.0 treatment decreased the EXE Cd content the most. For the same culture time, compared with CK, the EXE Cd content decreased with different treatments. At 0 d of culture, compared with CK, the EXE Cd content of soil treated with nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively decreased by 1.92, 1.77, 2.21, 2.06, 2.60, and 2.40 mg·kg−1. When cultured for 56 d, compared with CK, the EXE Cd content of soil treated with nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively decreased by 2.81, 2.53, and 3.39, 3.07, 4.14, and 3.73 mg·kg−1. For the same culture time and dose level, potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine significantly reduced the EXE Cd content in soil compared to potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite; the nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments significantly reduced the EXE Cd content, and the former was better than the latter. For the same treatment, the higher the dosage, the greater the reduction of EXE Cd content.
According to the significance analysis of the influence of different treatments on the EXE Cd content, as shown in Figure 1, it could be seen that the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate could significantly reduce the EXE Cd content, and both showed significant differences compared to the CK treatment. For the same culture time and phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application, there were significant differences in the effects of different application dosages. The nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments had better effects, with the nPS700-2.0 treatment having the best effect. For the combined application of the same kind of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate, increasing culture time had no significant effect on the EXE Cd content in soil.

3.2. Effect of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Application on the Carbonate-Bound Cd Content in Soil

The changes in CAB Cd content of soil treated with potassium dihydrogen phosphate at different dose levels combined with nano serpentine thermally activated at 700 °C and nano zeolite thermally activated at 700 °C are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen from the figure that, for the same cultivation time, compared with the CK treatment, the CAB Cd content increased with different treatments. At 0 d of culture, compared with the CK treatment, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments respectively increased the CAB Cd content by 0.29, 0.29, 0.42, 0.39, 0.54, and 0.51 mg·kg−1. When cultured for 14 d, compared with the CK treatment, the CAB Cd content of soil treated with nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 increased by 0.35, 0.34, 0.52, 0.48, 0.66, 0.61 mg·kg−1, respectively. At 56 d of culture, compared with the CK treatment, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments increased the CAB Cd content by 0.40, 0.39, 0.59, 0.55, 0.74, and 0.68 mg·kg−1, in turn. For the same treatment, the CAB Cd content in soil increased slightly with increasing culture time. Cultured for 28 d compared with 0 d, the CAB Cd content of soils treated with CK, nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively increased by 0.04, 0.14, 0.13, 0.19, 0.18, 0.21, and 0.19 units. When cultured for 56 d compared with 0 d, the CAB Cd content of soil treated with CK, nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively increased by 0.06, 0.17, 0.16, 0.23, 0.22, 0.26, and 0.23 units. For the same treatment, the higher the application dose, the greater the increase in CAB Cd content. For the same dose level, potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with nano serpentine thermally activated at 700 °C had a better effect on Cd-contaminated soil than potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with nano zeolite thermally activated at 700 °C. The combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate could increase the CAB Cd content in the soil. One reason for these results is that Cd2+ will react with OH to form Cd(OH)2, and Cd(OH)2 can absorb CO2 to form CdCO3 precipitates. Second, Cd2+ reacts directly with CO32− in soil to form CdCO3 precipitates.
It can be seen from Figure 2 that the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate could significantly increase the CAB Cd content, and the difference was significant compared with the CK treatment. On the whole, the treatment effect of phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano serpentine was better than that of phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano zeolite, but the difference was small.

3.3. Effect of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Application on Organic-Bound Cd Content in Soil

Figure 3 shows the change in OM Cd content in soil when treated with potassium dihydrogen phosphate at different dose levels combined with nano serpentine thermally activated at 700 °C and nano zeolite thermally activated at 700 °C. As can be seen from the figure, the OM Cd content in soil increased slightly with increasing culture time under the same treatment. Cultured for 28 d compared with 0 d, the OM Cd content of soil treated with CK, nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively increased by 14.81%, 25.00%, 23.21%, 27.54%, 27.27%, 25.93%, and 24.36%. Cultured for 56 d compared with 0 d, the OM Cd content of soil treated with CK, nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPS700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively increased by 22.22%, 30.36%, 28.57%, 33.33%, 33.33%, 32.10%, and 29.49%; the nPS700-2.0 treatment increased the soil OM Cd content the most. For the same culture time, compared with CK, the OM Cd content of the soil increased with different treatments. At 0 d of culture, compared with CK, the OM Cd content of the soil treated with nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 was respectively increased by 107.41%, 107.41%, 155.56%, 144.44%, 200.00%, and 188.89%. When cultured for 56 d, compared with the CK treatment, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments increased the soil OM Cd content by 121.21%, 118.18%, 178.79%, 166.67%, 224.24%, and 206.06%, in turn. In conclusion, different dosage levels of potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine or 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite could increase the soil OM Cd content; the higher the dose, the higher the OM Cd content. Among them, the nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments increased the OM Cd content the most obviously, and the former treatment was better than the latter. The key to the increase in the OM Cd content was that the solubility of organic matter in soil increases with increasing pH value and the complexing ability also increases.
According to the significant analysis results of the effects of the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate on the OM Cd content in soil, as shown in Figure 3, all treatments could significantly increase the OM Cd content in each culture period compared with the CK treatment. For the same application dose, the effect of phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano serpentine was more obvious than that of phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano zeolite.

3.4. Effect of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Application on Iron-Manganese Oxide-Bound Cd Content in Soil

The changes in FMO Cd content in soil with different dose levels of potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano serpentine and thermo-activated nano zeolite are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen from the figure that for the same incubation time, the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate with 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine or 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite could increase the soil FMO Cd content compared with CK treatment. At 0 d of culture, compared with CK, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments respectively increased the soil FMO Cd content by 0.16, 0.15, 0.20, 0.18, 0.24, and 0.23 units. When cultured for 28 d, compared with the CK treatment, the soil FMO Cd content increased with the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments by 0.20, 0.17, 0.27, 0.23, 0.32, and 0.29 units, respectively. After 56 d of culture, compared with the CK treatment, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments respectively increased the soil FMO Cd content by 0.21, 0.17, 0.29, 0.24, 0.35, and 0.31 units. For the same treatment, the FMO Cd content increased slightly with increasing culture time. When cultured for 56 d, compared with 0 d, the FMO Cd content of soil treated with CK, nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 increased by 0.09, 0.14, 0.11, 0.18, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.17 mg·kg−1, in turn. For the same dose level, potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with nano serpentine thermally activated at 700 °C increased the FMO Cd content more than potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with nano zeolite thermally activated at 700 °C; the higher the dose level, the higher the soil FMO Cd content. The nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments significantly increased the FMO Cd content, with the nPS700-2.0 treatment causing the most significant increase.
From the significance analysis of the effects of different treatments on the FMO Cd content, as shown in Figure 4, it could be seen that the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate could significantly increase the FMO Cd content, and there were significant differences compared with the CK treatment. For the same kind of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate treatment, increasing dosage had a significant effect on the change in FMO Cd content. With increasing culture time, there was no significant difference in the influence of different treatments on the FMO Cd content.

3.5. Effect of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Application on Residual Cd Content in Soil

Figure 5 shows the changes in soil RES Cd content when potassium dihydrogen phosphate at different dose levels was combined with nano serpentine and nano zeolite thermally activated at 700 °C. In general, the RES Cd content was significantly increased after combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine or with potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite compared to CK treatment in Cd-contaminated soil. It can be seen from the figure that for the same treatment, with increasing culture time, the soil RES Cd content increased. When cultured for 56 d, compared with 0 d, the RES Cd content in soil treated with CK, nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 respectively increased 23.44%, 38.60%, 37.20%, 43.93%, 40.83%, 52.46%, and 51.43%. For the same culture time, different treatments could increase the RES Cd content compared with the CK treatment. At 0 d of culture, compared with the CK treatment, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments respectively increased the soil RES Cd content by 1.07, 1.00, 1.09, 1.05, 1.19, and 1.11 units. At 56 d of culture, compared with the CK treatment, the nPS700-0.5, nPF700-0.5, nPS700-1.0, nPF700-1.0, nPS700-2.0, and nPF700-2.0 treatments increased the soil RES Cd content by 1.58, 1.46, 1.70, 1.59, 2.00, and 1.86 mg·kg−1, respectively. In conclusion, for the same dose level, potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano serpentine had a better effect on Cd-contaminated soil than potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with 700 °C thermo-activated nano zeolite. The soil RES Cd content increased most significantly with the nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments, and the former increased the soil RES Cd content more significantly than the latter. For the same treatment, the higher the dose level, the higher the RES Cd content.
Figure 5 shows the significance analysis of the different effects of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the RES Cd content of soil with different culture times. It can be seen from the figure that all treatments significantly increased the RES Cd content compared with the CK treatment, with significant differences. For the same culture time, the treatment effect of phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano serpentine was better than that of phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano zeolite, but the difference was not obvious. With increasing application dose of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate, the significant difference became more and more significant.

3.6. Effects of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Applicationon the Proportions of Cd Forms in Soil

Figure 6 shows the changes in the proportions of soil Cd speciation after culturing for 56 d with phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate. As can be seen from the figure, the effects of the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate on the forms of heavy metal Cd in soil were mainly as follows: the EXE Cd content gradually decreased and the CAB, OM, FMO, and RES Cd contents gradually increased. After 56 d of culture, the main form of Cd in CK-treated soil was EXE, accounting for 80.10%, followed by RES (7.90%), OM (7.50%), CAB (3.30%), and FMO (1.20%). Compared with the CK treatment, the soil EXE Cd content decreased by 35.08~51.69% with nPS700-0.5~2.0 treatment, and the nPF700-0.5~2.0 treatment decreased the soil EXE Cd content by 31.59~46.57%. This indicated that the higher the dosage level, the more the EXE Cd content decreased, with the nPS700-2.0 treatment causing the most obvious decrease. The soil RES Cd content increased by 200.0~253.16% with the nPS700-0.5~2.0 treatments and 184.81~235.44% with the nPF700-0.5~2.0 treatments. The results showed that the combination of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine or potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite could increase the RES Cd content, with the former significantly increasing the RES Cd content compared to the latter. To sum up, the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine or the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite could remediate Cd-contaminated soils. With increasing dose level, the stabilizing effect on heavy metal Cd also increased; the stabilization effects of the nPS700-2.0 and nPF700-2.0 treatments were the most obvious, with the nPS700-2.0 treatment having a better stabilizing effect than the nPF700-2.0 treatment. For the same dose level, the combination of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine had a better effect than potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite on stabilizing heavy metal Cd.

3.7. Comparative Analysis between This Study and Other Studies

Wang et al. [35] explored the effects of different doses (1%, 3%, and 5% of soil weight) of thermo-activated serpentine on the occurrence of cadmium in soil contaminated by exogenous Cd, indicating that the proportion of exchangeable Cd in the soil decreased by 24.26~39.34% and the content of residual Cd increased by 10.61~12.66%.
Cao et al. [40] fixed Cd in simulated contaminated soil with thermo-activated serpentine. Under the same treatment conditions, compared with the CK treatment, adding S700 (serpentine activated at 700 °C) reduced the exchangeable Cd content by 23.76~36.49% and increased the carbonate-bound, iron-manganese oxide-bound, organic matter-bound, and residual Cd by 6.03~8.03%, 6.05~8.35%, 0.49~0.54%, and 11.17~19.58%, respectively.
Li et al. [47] added zeolite to simulated Cd-contaminated soil, which significantly reduced the exchangeable Cd content in soil by 26.50% compared with the control. The carbonate-bound and residual Cd contents increased and the organic-bound Cd content was slightly lower than with the control CK treatment.
Compared with other research results, this experimental study showed that treatment with phosphates and thermo-activated nano silicates has great potential for the immobilization of Cd in soil.

4. Discussion of the Mechanism Underlying the Ability of Phosphate and Thermo-Activated Nano Silicate Combined Application to Repair Cd Pollution

Potassium dihydrogen phosphate is a strong base and weak acid salt, and its effect after entering the soil is mainly reflected in the following aspects: firstly, it mainly exists in the form of H2PO4 after entering the soil solution, and OH can be resolved from the soil colloid through ion exchange, thereby resulting in an increase in soil pH [48], precipitation with Cd2+, and removal of heavy metal Cd. Secondly, KH2PO4 in the soil exists in the form of ions, and the particle size of the ion is smaller than the pore size of zeolite (or serpentine). When the zeolite (or serpentine) is in contact with KH2PO4 solution, some ions will enter the zeolite (or serpentine) aperture and be adsorbed by the zeolite (or serpentine). Thirdly, when zeolite (or serpentine) is applied to soil, due to the high pH of the mineral itself, the soil environmental pH will increase, H2PO4 will be converted into PO43−. PO43− is the bridge between the soil surface and Cd2+, producing the S-L-Mn+ adsorption mode (S, L, and Mn+ represent the soil surface, PO43−, and metal ions, respectively) [49]. After PO43− is adsorbed on the soil surface, the amount of negative charge on the surface increases, which is conducive to the non-obligate adsorption of positively charged Cd2+, and the increased net surface charge also promotes continuous adsorption of Cd2+ by the soil via electrostatic adsorption [50].
Zeolite is a kind of shelf-like aluminosilicate mineral, which increases the cation exchange capacity of soil and enhances the adsorption capacity of heavy metal ions after being applied to the soil [51]. Ca2+, Mg2+, and Fe3+ in zeolite react with phosphate to form precipitates, and ligand exchange occurs between hydroxyl groups in Si-OH on the zeolite surface and phosphate radicals, leading to a large amount of OH entering the soil solution [52], which competes with PO43− on the adsorption site. Compared with OH and PO43−, Al3+ is more likely to precipitate with OH, when the amount of Al3+ is excessive, excess Al3+ will form precipitates with PO43−. The solubility product constant of Al(OH)3 is 1.3 × 10−33, which is smaller than that of AlPO4 (6.3 × 10−19), so Al(OH)3 more easily generates precipitates than AlPO4. Compared with OH- and PO43−, Cd2+ is more likely to form precipitates with PO43−. When the amount of Cd2+ is excessive, excessive Cd2+ will form precipitates with OH. The solubility product constant of Cd3(PO4)2 is 2.53 × 10−33, which is much smaller than that of Cd(OH)2 (5.27 × 10−15), so Cd3(PO4)2 more easily generates precipitates than Cd(OH)2. In the same way, it can be seen that Al(OH)3 more easily precipitates than Cd(OH)2, and Cd3(PO4)2 is more likely to form precipitates than AlPO4. In summary, the sequence of precipitation formation is Al(OH)3, Cd3(PO4)2, AlPO4, and Cd(OH)2.
Serpentine is a kind of layered magnesium silicate mineral, which has a significant adsorption effect on various heavy metal ions. The adsorption of heavy metals by serpentine mainly depends on OH and the unsaturated Si-O-Si bonds of serpentine. The oxygen in the Si-O-Si bond exposed by nano treatment of serpentine combines with Cd2+ to stabilize heavy metal Cd. The OH in the serpentine magnesia octahedron is easier to dissociate than Mg2+, making the surface of serpentine positively charged [53,54]. Mg2+ reacts with phosphate to form complexes or MgO reacts with CO2 to form MgCO3 [55,56]. With continuous dissociation, OH levels in the solution increase, which produces competitive adsorption with PO43− and CO32−. Comparing OH, PO43−, and CO32−, Mg2+ is more likely to form soluble complexes or precipitates with PO43−. When the amount of Mg2+ is excessive, the excessive Mg2+ will form precipitated Mg(OH)2 with OH, and then form MgCO3 with CO32−. The solubility product constant of Mg3(PO4)2 is 1.04 × 10−24, which is less than that of Mg(OH)2 (1.8 × 10−11) and MgCO3 (6.82×10−6), so the order of the formation of precipitation is Mg3(PO4)2, Mg(OH)2, and MgCO3. Comparing OH, PO43−, and CO32−, Cd2+ is more likely to form precipitates with PO43−. When the amount of Cd2+ is excessive, excessive Cd2+ will form precipitated Cd(OH)2 with OH, and then form CdCO3 with CO32−. The solubility product constant of Cd3(PO4)2 is 2.53 × 10−33, which is much smaller than that of Cd(OH)2 (5.27 × 10−15) and CdCO3 (1.0 × 10−12), so the sequence of the formation of precipitation is Cd3(PO4)2, Cd(OH)2, and CdCO3. Similarly, it can be seen that Cd3(PO4)2 more easily form precipitates than Mg3(PO4)2, Cd(OH)2 is more likely to form precipitates than Mg(OH)2, and CdCO3 is more likely to form precipitates than MgCO3. In other words, the sequence of precipitation formation is Cd3(PO4)2, Mg3(PO4)2, Cd(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, CdCO3, and MgCO3.
In conclusion, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, zeolite, and serpentine can stabilize heavy metal cadmium to varying degrees, thereby adsorbing and precipitating it in the environment. The application of phosphate and silicate can stabilize heavy metal cadmium, but the application amount should also be appropriate since excessive application will cause a series of problems, such as economic burden and soil compaction. The next focus of this research will be on moving from the laboratory simulation to the field in order to explore the effects and problems generated in actual production and find the best method to control heavy metal cadmium pollution.

5. Conclusions

This paper conducted indoor tests of remediation of simulated Cd-contaminated soil through the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate, analyzing the effects of the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine and the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite on the five forms of Cd. The following conclusions can be drawn:
  • The effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the form of heavy metal Cd in soil is mainly as follows: the content of exchangeable Cd was reduced and converted into carbonate bound form, Fe-Mn oxide bound form, organic bound form and the residual form Cd content, indicated that the combined application of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate can stabilize heavy metals and reduce the bioavailability of heavy metal Cd.
  • When phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate were applied together, the heavy metal Cd content in soil changed from a biologically available state to a biologically unusable state with increasing culture time and application dose level. For the same incubation time, the order of the effect of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine on remediation of Cd-contaminated soil was: nPS700-2.0 > nPS700-1.0 > nPS700-0.5. The order of the effect of the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite on the remediation of Cd-contaminated soil was: nPF700-2.0 > nPF700-1.0 > nPF700-0.5. At the same dose level, compared with the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite, the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine was more effective in the remediation of Cd-contaminated soil (nPS700-2.0 > nPF700-2.0, nPS700-1.0 > nPF700-1.0, nPS700-0.5 > nPF700-0.5), and the nPS700-2.0 treatment was more effective than the nPF700-2.0 treatment in the remediation of Cd-contaminated soil.
  • The effects of potassium dihydrogen phosphate, zeolite, and serpentine after entering the soil are mainly reflected in the following aspects: first, potassium dihydrogen phosphate mainly exists in the form of H2PO4 after entering the soil solution. OH can be exchanged and resolved from the soil colloid, and the hydroxyl groups in Si-OH on the zeolite surface can be exchanged with PO43−, which makes OH enter the soil solution. After nano treatment of serpentine, the combination of oxygen in the Si-O-Si bond with Cd2+ can stabilize heavy metal Cd, while OH in the serpentine magnesia octahedron is easier to dissociate than Mg2+. Second, KH2PO4 in the soil exists in the form of ions, and the particle size of the ions is smaller than the pore size of the silicate minerals, so some ions will enter the pores of the silicate minerals and be adsorbed by the silicate minerals. Third, after silicate minerals are applied to the soil, due to the high pH of the minerals themselves, the pH of the soil environment will increase and H2PO4 will be converted into PO43−. PO43− is the bridge between the soil surface and Cd2+. As the soil surface adsorbs PO43−, the negative charge on the surface increases, which is conducive to the non-specific adsorption of Cd2+. Additionally, the increased net surface charge promotes the continuous adsorption of Cd2+ by the soil via electrostatic adsorption. To sum up, the combined application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano serpentine and the combined application of potassium hydrogen phosphate and thermo-activated nano zeolite can repair cadmium pollution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and X.W.; Experiment, Methodology, Data Processing and Writing-Original Draft Preparation, X.W.; Software, Validation, Q.L.; Review, Guide and Funding Acquisition, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by General Items of National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072677); Liaoning Province Applied Basic Research Program (2022JH2/101300173); College Project of Liaoning Agricultural Technical College (Lnz2021-08).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions eg privacy or ethical. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the first author is still under her PhD researches.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge Hongtao Zou and every teacher, classmate, and friend who helped the authors with their experiments and writing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Gallego, S.M.; Benavídes, M.P.; Tomaro, M.L. Effect of heavy metal ion excess on sunflower leaves: Evidence for involvement of oxidative stress. Plant. Sci. 1996, 121, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, Y.Z.; Zhu, Y.G. A review on cadmium contamination in forest ecosystem. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2004, 24, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, R.K.; Xiong, L.M.; Shi, Z.Y. Study on cadmium in soil-crop system. Soils 1992, 24, 129–132. Available online: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TURA199203004.htm (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  4. Zhang, X.M.; Yang, Q.W.; Li, Y. Progress of status and remediation of soil cadmium pollution. J. Hebei Agric. Sci. (China) 2010, 14, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karblane, H. The effect of organic lime and phosphorus fertilizers on Pb, Cd and Hg content in plants. Pro. Est. Acad. Sci. Ecol. 1994, 52–56. Available online: https://eurekamag.com/research/003/302/003302290.php (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  6. Wang, K.J.; Xing, B.S. Adsorption and Desorption of Cadminum by Goethite Pretreated with Phosphate. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, S.B.; Zhu, Y.G.; Yang, J.C. Mechanism of the effect of phosphorus on bioavailability of heavy metals in soil-plant systems. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2003, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, Y.Z. Interaction between Cadmium and phosphorus, zinc, iron and calcium and its ecological effects. J. Ecol. 2004, 23, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, K.; Maity, A.; Ghosh, U.C. Manganese associated nanoparticles agglomerate of iron(Ⅲ) oxide: Synthesis, characterization and arsenic(Ⅲ) sorption behavior with mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184, 832–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, Z.G.; Lian, F.; Yu, Z.H.; Zhu, L.Y.; Xing, B.S.; Qiu, W.W. Synthesis and characterization of a novel MnOx-loaded biochar and its adsorption properties for Cu2+ in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yaqqob, A.A.; Parveen, T.; Umar, K.; Ibrahim, M.N.M. Role of nanomaterials in the treatment of wastewater: A review. Water 2020, 12, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Idris, M.O.; Ibrahim, M.N.M.; Ahmad, A.; Alshammari, M.B. Introduction of Adsorption Techniques for Heavy Metals Remediation. In Emerging Techniques for Treatment of Toxic Metals from Wastewater; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zwonitzer, J.C.; Pierzynski, G.M.; Hettiarachchi, G.M. Effects of phosphorus additions on lead, cadmium, and zinc bioavailabilities in a metal-contaminated soil. Water. Air. Soil. Poll. 2003, 143, 193–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Raicevic, S.; Kaludjerovic-Radoicic, T.; Zouboulis, A.I. In situ stabilization of toxic metals in polluted soils using phosphates: Theoretical prediction and experimental verification. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, B117, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Matusik, J.; Bajda, T.; Manecki, M. Immobilization of aqueous cadmium by addition of phosphates. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 1332–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mignardi, S.; Corami, A.; Ferrini, V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of phosphate treatment for the remediation of mine waste soils contaminated with Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn. J. Chemosphere 2012, 86, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiao, R.B.; Huang, Z.H.; Li, X.N.; Chen, W.P.; Deng, Y.R.; Han, C.L. Lime and Phosphate Amendment Can Significantly Reduce Uptake of Cd and Pb by Field-Grown Rice. Sustainability 2017, 9, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, D.; Wang, X.B.; Wang, X.L.; Feng, K.; Zhang, X.M.; Song, J.; Bei, J.L. Screening of Passivators for Cadmium-contaminated Red Soil and Their Effects on Soil Remediation. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2020, 36, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. NiñoSavala, A.G.; Weishaar, B.; Franzaring, J.; Liu, X.J.; Fangmeier, A. Cd and Zn concentrations in soil and silage maize following the addition of P fertilizer. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Su, J.C.; Wang, X.B.; Wang, X.L.; Dong, J.N.; Wang, H.C.; Saima, P.M.; Feng, C. Passivation effects of different passivators on cadmium contaminated yellow soil and brown soil. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. (China) 2021, 49, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Castaldi, P.; Melis, P.; Silvetti, M.; Deiana, P.; Garau, G. Influence of pea and wheat growth on Pb, Cd, and Zn mobility and soil biological status in a polluted amended soil. Geoderma 2009, 151, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hamidpour, M.; Afyuni, M.; Kalbasi, M.; Khoshgoftarmanes, A.H.; Inglezakis, V.J. Mobility and plant-availability of Cd(II) and Pb(II) adsorbed on zeolite and bentonite. Appl. Clay. Sci. 2010, 48, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Taparcevska, J.; Markovska, L.; Koumanova, B.; Meshko, V. Diffusion models for adsorption kinetics of Zn(2+), Cd(2+) and Pb(2+) onto natural zeolite. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fard, N.E.; Givi, J.; Houshmand, S. The effect of zeolite, bentonite and sepiolite minerals on heavy metal uptake by sunflower. J. Sci. Tech. Greenh. Cult. 2015, 6, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Javadian, H.; Ghorbani, F.; Tayebi, H.A.; Asl, S.M.H. Study of the adsorption of Cd (II) from aqueous solution using zeolite-based geopolymer; synthesized from coal fly ash, kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Arab. J. Chem. 2015, 8, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Andrejkovičová, S.; Sudagar, A.; Rocha, J.; Patinha, C.; Hajjaji, W.; Silva, E.F.; Velosa, A.; Rocha, F. The effect of natural zeolite on microstructure; mechanical and heavy metals adsorption properties of metakaolin based geopolymers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 126, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, J.; Sun, X.Y.; Suo, L.N.; Wang, L.; Sun, N.; Xu, N.; Li, J. Effects of two modifiers on passivation of cadmium in calcareous soil in northern China and growth of pakchoi. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin. 2022, 37, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, C.; Zhu, L.W.; Li, J.T.; Du, Q.Q.; Xiao, J.H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, R. Study on the passivation effect of different treatments on weakly acidic cadmium polluted soil. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. (China) 2022, 38, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, X.J.; Wang, L.J.; Lu, A.H.; Wang, C.Q. Preliminary study on the mechanism of natural serpentine. Rock. Miner. J. (China) 2003, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morante-Carballo, F.; Montalvan-Burbano, N.; Carrion-Mero, P.; Jacome-Francis, K. Worldwide Research Analysis on Natural Zeolites as Environmental Remediation Materials. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, Z.K. Treatment of copper-containing wastewater with serpentine. Environ. Sci. Technol. (China) 1997, 17–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, J.X.; Yuan, C.G. Experimental study on the treatment of heavy metals in sewage by serpentine adsorption. Fine. Chem. (China) 2000, 17, 586–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luo, W.H. Study on the Serpentine Mineral and Its Adsorption Performance; Chang’an University: Xi’an, China, 2008; Available online: https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11941-2009066599.htm (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  34. Zhang, Z.M.; Huang, Z.B.; Shan, R.J.; Feng, Y.Y.; Yang, J.C.; Liu, Y.C. Adsorption and desorption of Pb, Cd and As in contaminated soil by environmental materials. Environ. Eng. (China) 2013, 31, 122–126. Available online: https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJGC201303033.htm (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  35. Wang, X.; Liang, C.H.; Du, L.Y.; Wu, Y.; Yin, Y.; Hu, Y. Effects of Natural and Thermal Activation Serpentine on Cadmium Formations in Contaminated Soil. J. Soil. Water. Conserv. (China) 2015, 29, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.L.; Liang, C.H.; Ma, Z.H.; Han, Y. Effect of application phosphate and zeolite on morphological conversion of soil Cd. Environ. Sci. (China) 2015, 36, 1437–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bao, S.D. Agrochemical Analysis of Soil, 3rd ed.; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2000; pp. 25–200. Available online: https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=6cb4c2ed2a15c8650f16c6c609fa7307&site=xueshu_se (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  38. Xie, F.; Liang, C.H.; Meng, Q.H.; Gao, Y.D.; Song, S.Y. Effects of natural zeolite and lime on form transformation of cadmium in soil. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2014, 8, 3506–3510. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287325369_Effects_of_natural_zeolite_and_lime_on_form_transformation_of_cadmium_in_soil (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  39. Qi, N.; Liang, C.H.; Wang, X.; Yin, Y. The characteristics of thermal-modified serpentine’s adsorption of cadmium. Resour. Ind. (China) 2015, 17, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, C.Y.; Liang, C.H.; Yin, Y.; Du, L.Y. Thermal activation of serpentine for adsorption of cadmium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 329, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tessier, A.; Campbell, P.G.C.; Bisson, M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 1979, 51, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, E.L.; Wang, L. Distribution of different heavy metal forms in soil and their bio-availability. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. (China) 2006, 34, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, H.F.; Yan, M.; Wang, Y.B.; Liu, D.Y. Activities of soil enzymes related to forms and distribution of heavy metals in paddy soil in Anhui province. Soils (China) 2007, 39, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.X.; Yang, Q.X.; Chang, X.B. Analysis on the forms of heavy metals in the sludge of Yantai wastewater treatment plant. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. (China) 2008, 36, 11977–11979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, L.X. Soil heavy metal morphology and solubility organic matter environmental behavior. Environ. Sci. Technol. (China) 2008, 31, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, X.J.; Qiu, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, C.P.; Zeng, D.J.; Liu, S.H. Studies on manganese absorption and soil remediation of four ornamental plants. Guangxi Agric. Sci. (China) 2010, 41, 951–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, M.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, L.Y.; Su, X.N.; Dong, S.P.; Lan, X.P. Influence of Biochar and Zeolite on the fraction transform of Cadmium in contaminated soil. J. Soil Water. Conserv. 2014, 28, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, B.L.; Xie, Z.M. Effects of phosphorus application on translocation of lead, zinc and cadmium in the soil-plant system. Environ. Sci. 2008, 29, 3225–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zou, X.Z. Study on the Adsorption Characteristics of Copper Ions in Variable Charge Soil and Constant Charge Soil; Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences: Nanjing, China, 1999; pp. 58–59. Available online: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y370317 (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  50. Zhou, T.F.; Tao, C.J.; Li, X.L.; Chen, Y.N.; Chen, X.R.; Jia, S.J.; Yuan, F.; Chen, F.R. Effects of phosphoric acid on the adsorption characteristics of Cadmium; Mercury and Lead from paddy soil. Resour. Surv. Environ. 2009, 30, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mahabadi, A.A.; Hajabbasi, M.A.; Khademi, H.; Kazemian, H. Soil cadmium stabilization using an Iranian natural zeolite. Geoderma 2007, 137, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Anderson, M.A.; Robin, A.J. Aqueous Solution Adsorption Chemistry; Liu, L., Translator; Scientific Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1989; pp. 22–30. Available online: http://www.ckcest.zju.edu.cn/Engineering/ShowBook.action?BookNo=07107623 (accessed on 17 February 2023).
  53. Tartaj, P.; Cerpa, A.; García-González, M.T.; Serna, C.J. Surface instability of serpentine in aqueous suspensions. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2000, 231, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Feng, B.; Lu, Y.P.; Feng, Q.M.; Ding, P.; Luo, N. Mechanisms of surface charge development of serpentine mineral. Trans. Nonferrous. Met. Soc. (China) 2013, 23, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, M.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, L.Y.; Su, X.N.; Dong, S.P.; Lan, X.P. Effect of biocarbon and zeolite mixing on morphological conversion of soil Cd. J. Soil. Water. Conserv. (China) 2014, 28, 248–252. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jin, Z.; Jia, Y.; Luo, T.; Kong, L.T.; Sun, B.; Shen, W.; Meng, F.L.; Liu, J.H. Efficient removal of fluoride by hierarchical MgO microspheres: Performance and mechanism study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the exchangeable Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the exchangeable Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 15 04503 g001
Figure 2. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the carbonate-bound Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the carbonate-bound Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 15 04503 g002
Figure 3. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on organic-bound Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on organic-bound Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 15 04503 g003
Figure 4. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on iron-manganese oxide-bound Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on iron-manganese oxide-bound Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 15 04503 g004
Figure 5. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on residual Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effect of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on residual Cd content in soil. Different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference across different treatments (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Sustainability 15 04503 g005
Figure 6. Effects of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the proportion of Cd in soil after 56 d of culture.
Figure 6. Effects of phosphate and thermo-activated nano silicate combined application on the proportion of Cd in soil after 56 d of culture.
Sustainability 15 04503 g006
Table 1. The main components and content of the tested soil, zeolite and serpentine (wt. %).
Table 1. The main components and content of the tested soil, zeolite and serpentine (wt. %).
CompositionSiO2Al2O3MgOK2OCaONa2OFe2O3P2O5Other
Content in soil (wt. %)72.2310.339.832.552.231.660.170.230.16
Content in zeolite (wt. %)76.3212.493.783.242.301.290.5800
Content in serpentine (wt. %)57.240.1137.9703.200.181.3000
Table 2. Scheme of the ratios of potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano serpentine and thermo-activated nano zeolite.
Table 2. Scheme of the ratios of potassium dihydrogen phosphate combined with thermo-activated nano serpentine and thermo-activated nano zeolite.
SamplePotassium Dihydrogen Phosphate Dosage (%)700 °C Nano Serpentine Dosage (%)700 °C Nano Zeolite Dosage (%)
CK000
nPS700-0.50.170.33
nPS700-1.00.330.67
nPS700-2.00.671.33
nPF700-0.50.17 0.33
nPF700-1.00.33 0.67
nPF700-2.00.67 1.33
Table 3. Tessier continuous extraction method.
Table 3. Tessier continuous extraction method.
Cd Form NameExtractants and Extraction Conditions
Exchangeable state8 mL 1 mol·L−1 MgCl2 solution (pH adjusted to 7.0 with 0.1 mol·L−1 HCl) and continuously shaken horizontally at 25 °C for 1 h
Carbonate-bound state8 mL 1 mol·L−1 NaOAc solution (pH adjusted to 5.0 with HOAc) and continuously shaken horizontally at 25 °C for 5 h
Iron-manganese oxide-bound state20 mL 0.04 mol·L−1 NH2OH·HCl HOAc (25%, v/v) solution, stirred continuously in a water bath at 96 ± 3 °C for 6 h
Organic-bound state
(1)
3 mL 0.02 mol·L−1 HNO3 solution, then added 5 mL 30% H2O2 (pH adjusted to 2.0 with 2 mol·L−1 HNO3), heated in a water bath at 85 ± 2 °C for 2 h and stirred constantly
(2)
3 mL 30% H2O2 (pH adjusted to 2.0 with 2 mol·L−1 HNO3) in a water bath at 85 ± 2 °C for 3 h and stirred intermittently
(3)
5 mL HNO3 (20%, v/v) solution containing 3.2 mol·L−1 NH4OAc, continuously vibrated horizontally for 0.5 h at 25 °C
Residue stateHCl + HNO3 + HF + HClO4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Zou, H.; Liu, Q. Effects of Phosphate and Silicate Combined Application on Cadmium Form Changes in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054503

AMA Style

Wang X, Zou H, Liu Q. Effects of Phosphate and Silicate Combined Application on Cadmium Form Changes in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiuli, Hongtao Zou, and Qi Liu. 2023. "Effects of Phosphate and Silicate Combined Application on Cadmium Form Changes in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop