Next Article in Journal
How Managers’ Green Transformational Leadership Affects a Firm’s Environmental Strategy, Green Innovation, and Performance: The Moderating Impact of Differentiation Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Baseflow Variation in Southern Taiwan Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Sustainable Furniture Design Based on Waste Textiles Recycling

1
Kingston School of Art, Kingston University, Surrey KT1 2QJ, UK
2
Academy of Arts & Design, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3
Department of Industrial Design, Hanyang University ERICA Campus, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
4
College of Art and Design, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3601; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043601
Submission received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 11 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023

Abstract

:
As people’s living standards rise, textile waste becomes more significant, and the number of waste textiles grows swiftly, wreaking havoc on the earth’s ecosystem. Simultaneously, the creation of furniture consumes a significant amount of wood. The paint and adhesive used to manufacture it are also unsustainable and harmful to human beings. Therefore, one of the most urgent environmental challenges that needs to be paid attention to at present is the recycling of waste textiles and the sustainable recycling of furniture. Given this situation, this study proposes a solution combining sustainable design with composite material manufacturing. Guided by this solution, this study obtained a waste textile-starch composite material combining waste textiles, starch, and other components using microwave expansion technology. The material is biodegradable, environmentally friendly, and non-polluting. It can be customized to meet different design needs. Then, this research applies the material to sustainable furniture design and obtains a set of design works with sustainable characteristics. This kind of sustainable design scheme can eliminate the pollution and waste of waste textiles. At the same time, waste textile-starch composites can also serve as an economical and environmentally friendly alternative to many synthetic and natural materials used in furniture design and manufacturing. This reform scheme has a tremendous sustainable development promise and can simultaneously handle the problems of waste textile pollution and furniture resources.

1. Introduction

Rising consumption levels, increasing per capita consumption of textile fibers, rapid turnover of fashion cycles, and the short lifespan of cheap textiles have led to the generation of large amounts of textile waste each year [1,2,3,4]. In 2021, the total processing of textile fibers reached 67.09 million tons in China [5]. Along with the high production of textiles, China can produce about 24 million tons of waste textiles each year, but less than three ten thousandths can be recycled [6]. Not only has this been observed in China, but it is estimated that Europe generates more than 95 million tons of textile waste annually [7,8]. Approximately GBP 140 million of wearable clothing is disposed of in landfills in the UK each year [9], with a large proportion of waste used clothing being landfilled or incinerated [10,11,12]. Excessive clothing consumption and waste have become a global problem [13]. If renewable resources continue to be consumed at this rate, future generations will face serious survival problems [14]. At the same time, the white paper, “Advances in recycling technology for waste textiles in China”, estimates that chemical fibers account for 70% of waste textiles [15]. It is not straightforward for the earth to explain and digest chemical fibers. Therefore, from the perspective of sustainable development, textile waste must be considered and utilized as a resource to alleviate the current very critical situation [16,17].
The Classification and Code of Waste Textiles classifies waste textiles as cotton, wool, polyester, nylon, acrylic, mixes, and other types [18]. Natural fabrics quickly decay after recycling; cotton items typically require 1 to 5 months, wool products require 1 to 5 years, and silk products require approximately four years to break down. In contrast, artificial fiber woven products deteriorate more slowly or are even more challenging to decompose [19]. Nylon items typically take 30–40 years, and polyester products require 20–200 years [20,21].
Generally, the traditional methods of treating textile industrial waste are landfill and incineration [22,23]. However, the development of textile recycling and reuse technology can meet the current and future recycling business needs, reducing textiles’ impact on the environment [24,25]. Among them, the treatment methods of recycling and decontamination include physical and chemical recycling treatment, such as thermal recycling technology, material recycling technology, and chemical recycling technology [26]. In addition, there are new treatment methods, such as the super-critical method [27], the ionic solution method [28], solid-state enzymatic hydrolysis [29], and enzymatic degradation [30]. In addition to the direct recycling and decomposition of waste textiles, waste textiles residue redesign is also popular in the apparel industry [31]. There are methods such as waste textile remaking, patchwork stitching, fabric transformation, and fabric decoration [32]. Nike has created the Move to Zero programs to promote sustainability [33], which recycles shoes, clothes, and other products into recycled plastics, yarns, and textiles, of which recycled materials can account for 70% of the product [34]. On the first level of Nike Town in London, England, there are numerous Move to Zero sneakers on exhibit. It displays the recycled materials, the processing, and the final product to the consumer. In addition, several clothing labels, including Rua Carlota [35], Everlane [36], Baserange [37], GAP [38], Levi’s [39], C&A [40], Inditex group [41], and Nude Jeans [42] featured or developed a line of sustainable apparel to contribute to the sustainability of waste textiles fabrics [43].
With the pollution and waste of waste textiles, the waste and pollution of furniture is also very serious. Association (UEA), 80% to 90% of EU furniture waste in Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is burned or sent to landfill. Only 0.3% of second-hand furniture was recycled [44]. In Australia, the average household discards 24 kg of furniture annually, two-thirds of which are made of wood, and the rest are sofas and armchairs [45]. Generally, the furniture consists of many parts, including wood, metal, and various plastics, making the recycling process extraordinarily complex and challenging [46,47]. In addition, most of the furniture on the market is made of particleboards containing toxic chemical adhesives, which even contain harmful chemicals, such as flame retardants [48]. These materials are almost impossible to recycle and are difficult and expensive to handle [49]. The current situation of waste furniture is thought-provoking. Therefore, replacing the materials for furniture production and reducing the waste of resources and environmental pollution in the process of furniture production and use are also important issues that people should consider.
In terms of sustainable utilization of waste furniture, it is a feasible method to finish and repair some old furniture with better quality [50]. However, this method has poor effects and limitations. For example, the repair cost is sometimes twice or three times that of new furniture, and the use of repair materials is also elementary to cause waste [51]. In addition, recycling waste furniture materials and producing green and sustainable furniture have become effective means for some countries to promote the value chain of ecological and “green” products [52]. For example, IKEA provided its “People and Earth Positive” sustainable development plan [53], which is committed to recycling and using renewable resources to make furniture. First, ecological materials must be used for furniture construction [54]. Second, processing, recycling, and destruction should discharge pollutants as little as possible to minimize environmental damage [55]. Finally, furniture design must meet consumer expectations and maximize durability. Materials can still be recycled and reused when furniture is wasted to realize a circular economy [56].
With the continuous deepening and development of research in recent years, many scholars have found that waste textiles can be used for furniture, construction, and other purposes [57]. On the one hand, this method can recycle waste textiles. On the other hand, it can also reduce the use of raw materials for furniture production and significantly save natural resources. For example, Professor Veena Sahajwalla, founder of the Centre for Sustainable Materials Research and Technology (SMaRT) at the University of New South Wales, mixed the fabric with broken glass and pressed it into sheets. These plates can be used for building, industry, and furniture [58,59]. Zunjarrao Kamble and Bijoya Kumar Behera manufactured a new composite material from waste cotton textiles by laminating unidirectional glass fiber preforms with needled jute nonwovens. This material has sufficient thermal stability and can replace moderately priced and inexpensive wood in furniture, construction, and construction materials [60]. In addition, some designers combine fabrics with bioplastics to make furniture panels [61], such as tables and chairs [62]. Designers use various technologies and materials to rejuvenate Waste textiles and create more sustainable solutions for furniture design.
However, in applying waste textiles to furniture design and manufacturing, most scholars only study the recycling of textiles from the perspective of material research and use them for furniture product manufacturing. The process lacks systematic design strategies as guidance. Moreover, consumers have some doubts about the safety of recycled products. The recognition rate of consumers for this behavior is low. At the same time, its related manufacturing process is relatively complex, and the cost of auxiliary materials is high. More importantly, at present, few people use the strategy of sustainable design based on material research and development, and use it for design applications to solve the problems of waste and pollution of waste textiles and waste and pollution of waste furniture at the same time.
Therefore, to solve the above problems, this study aims to apply a sustainable design strategy to redesign and manufacture furniture and to incorporate textile waste into the design of environment-friendly furniture by combining other materials and using appropriate technology. First, “sustainable design” is the core design principle of this project. “Sustainable design” originates from the concept of sustainable development [63] and is the in-depth thinking of the design community on the relationship between human development and environmental challenges [64]. Since the 1980s, sustainable design has been actively guiding the design of all types of sustainable products, services, structures, environment, and social systems and has become a strategic activity to promote sustainable transformation [65,66]. Sustainable design theory contains much knowledge about how to solve environmental and social problems by rethinking industrial products and processes and how organizations play a role in a more sustainable socio-economic structure [65,67,68,69]. Second, the sustainable design focuses on the experience and feelings of consumers. It is essential for consumers to embrace and purchase environmentally sustainable materials. It was discovered that consumers in developed countries are more familiar with and accepting of sustainable and recycled items [70], whereas consumers in other countries and regions generally have favorable attitudes about recycled products [71]. Notable is the fact that British consumers prefer recycled products to non-recycled products of comparable price and quality [72]. Therefore, the application of sustainable design and the creation of recycled materials are ecologically desirable and have market development potential [73]. Thirdly, the scheme uses starch as auxiliary material to synthesize textile waste into a composite material and use it for furniture design. According to previous studies, starch is mainly used as a sizing agent in the textile industry, while modified starch is mainly used as material for warp sizing, printing sizing, and fabric finishing agent [74]. In addition, pre-gelatinized starch can be used as an adhesive, thickener, and stabilizer in construction. Therefore, using starch as auxiliary material has the advantages of low cost and convenient manufacturing.
Under the guidance of the sustainable design concept, firstly, this paper studies the sustainable reuse of waste textiles materials through experiments supported by relevant theoretical basis to produce complex, light, porous, and sustainable starch textile fiber composites. In this process, the performance and sustainability of waste textile-starch composites used in furniture design and production are emphatically analyzed. Secondly, this material with unique characteristics is applied to sustainable furniture design, and the possibility of solving the problems of waste textile pollution and waste furniture is also explored in this way.

2. Methods

2.1. Design Method Process

The design research methods of this project mainly focus on material research with method support and design application research. Method support includes starch gelatinization and gel, the principle behind microwave expansion technology, and the effect of microwave expansion on starch. The material research includes the selection of experimental equipment, the change of state at different heating times, the starch experiment, the fabric experiment, the ratio experiment, and the durability test of composite materials. The primary purpose of material research is to test whether the performance of materials can support the design and manufacture of furniture and whether they have pollution-free and sustainable characteristics. The description of material properties will be the core content of material research. It is the core point to demonstrate whether the waste textile-starch composite material is pollution-free and sustainable and whether it can replace natural materials to become furniture design and manufacturing. This core point is also the key to the effectiveness of the solution proposed in this paper. Based on the research results of material characteristics, the design research mainly focuses on designing the shape, function, and use of furniture according to specific requirements and displaying the sketches and results (Figure 1). Finally, the step of the design process is to summarize the effect of the solution on solving the pollution and waste of waste textiles and waste furniture.

2.2. Experimental Equipment and Steps

The experimental device consists of scissors, a microwave oven, a circuit breaker, an electronic scale, a heating container, a weighing container, a stirring rod, a stirring container, and a hardness tester (Table 1). Material production steps: cutting fabric; decomposing the fabric; placing the fabric in the container; adding the specified amount of starch and water; fully stirring; placing the container in the microwave oven; heating; cooling and molding (Figure 2). In addition to the microwave oven as the baking equipment, the air fryer and oven were also tested. However, the finished material is not sticky, has an insufficient hardness, and cannot expand. Therefore, it further proves the feasibility and flexibility of using microwave expansion technology.

2.3. Paste and Gelation of Starch

Starch is a natural renewable polymer resource; when starch is mixed with water and the water temperature rises above 53 °C, the physical properties of starch change significantly [75]. Raw starch is a cluster of microcrystals organized radially. When heated in the presence of water to soften and expand, the starch begins to form a paste at a particular temperature range. During this process, starch granules are broken down into a solution of polymers, which is referred to as dextrinized starch [76,77]. Gelation happens when starch turns dry because of a particular chemical or physical action [78]. During the gelation process, starch exhibits a transparent or translucent viscous viscosity, which varies depending on the kind of starch [79]. The viscous liquid eventually becomes elastic and robust as more water is lost, but as it continues to lose water, it loses its elasticity, dries up, and its volume decreases proportionately [80]. The drying of starch milk goes through a series of continuous changes of “pasting → initial gelation → gel water loss → gel nucleation → gel drying and shrinking”. The water in the process of change is the medium for the reaction of starch, and sufficient water and high temperature accelerate the gelation of starch slurry in forming [81]. The starch gelation process is an irreversible rearrangement of the molecular chain, and the gelatinized starch particles lack the crystallinity of the original starch and can be expanded without solubility [82]. Therefore, the gelatinized starch granules are water-insoluble, can be stored for an extended period, are difficult to degrade, and can be utilized in a variety of applications.
Different plant starches have distinct properties and pasting qualities. The pasting enthalpy of potato starch was greater than that of cassava and sweet potato starch, and the mixture of cassava starch and potato starch had the highest viscosity value, while cassava starch and its mixture had the lowest roughness [83]. Based on the findings of the textural investigation, potato starch gels were more rigid and viscous than corn and tapioca starch gels [83].

2.4. Microwave Puffing Technology

Microwave puffing technology uses the radiation conduction of electromagnetic energy so that its transmission to the interior of the material is absorbed by the moisture while instantaneously converting into heat, resulting in the violent vibration of molecules and the acquisition of kinetic energy to achieve the vaporization of water [84]. The microwave energy penetrates the material so that the polar molecules within the material friction and internal heat, so that the liquid inside the processed material instantly heated vaporization, pressurization, and expansion, and relying on the expansion force of the gas to polymeric material structure changes in the components, and become a net-like tissue structure characteristics, stereotypical porous material [85,86]. The more the microwave power, the greater the evaporation rate of water, and hence the greater the number of holes [87]. Expansion of the material is primarily determined by the material’s physical and chemical qualities as well as the development of a specific texture to enable the wrapping of water vapor and the building of pressure [88]. In addition, it also relies on its dielectric properties to absorb microwave energy effectively into thermal properties [89].
Microwave puffing technology is characterized by high energy conversion efficiency and fast heating speed [90]. The microwave puffing process has a sterilizing effect. Microwave sterilization is conducted under the combined influence of thermal and non-thermal factors. A good sterilizing result can be achieved at a lower temperature and in a shorter amount of time than with standard temperatures [91].

2.5. Effect of Microwave on Starch

According to the research results of Lewicka et al. [92], the principle of microwave expansion can also act on starch. Microwave heating can change the structure of starch particles. After microwave heating, the starch particles will deform, break, and disintegrate [92], making the volume of starch-solidified products expand and the structure loses. In addition, the water absorption and water retention of starch after microwave treatment are significantly improved, so the starch after microwave heating has good water absorption and water retention [93] and is not easy to melt.
Ndife et al. observed in their study of microwave radiation of wheat, maize, and rice starches that gel and chalky zones were produced when the ratio of starch to water was 1:1, and only gel zones were produced when the ratio of starch to water was 1:115 and 1:2 [94]. These studies show that the water content of starch has an essential effect on microwave radiation starch. The higher the moisture content of starch, the stronger the ability to absorb microwaves and the more violent the evaporation of water in it when the starch is heated [95]. In microwave-dried potato starch, the viscosity reduces dramatically, and the gelation temperature remains stable; when the water content is between 20% and 35%, viscosity decreases to a lesser extent, and the gelation temperature rises [96]. In addition, microwave energy has a more significant impact on microwave heating starch. When the microwave energy is too high or the heating time is too long, starch will occur a coking phenomenon [97].

3. Results

3.1. Study of Starch Composites

3.1.1. Study on the Change of Material Heating State

According to Table 2, during the microwave heating process, the water in the waste textile-starch mixture began to evaporate rapidly, while the whole object gradually expanded and filled with bubbles and small holes. After a certain degree of expansion, the waste textile-starch mixture will not continue to expand but gradually dry and shrink slightly. After the water is completely evaporated, the mixture starts to scorch from the inside and bottom. Therefore, heating time is a very critical control variable. The research on the state of a starch mixture under different heating times shows that the expansion, hardness, dryness, and wetness of starch mixture under microwave heating vary with the length of heating time, which helps to prepare composite materials for design by controlling the heating time according to the design requirements.

3.1.2. The Effect of Different Kinds of Starch on Waste Textiles-Starch Composites

Table 3 shows that corn starch, wheat starch, cassava starch, potato starch, sweet potato starch, pea starch, mung bean starch, and glutinous rice flour are selected as experimental materials to make starch composite materials. The experimental results show that the material state of different types of waste textile-starch mixtures has both similarities and differences. Waste textile-starch mixtures based on pea starch, corn starch, mung bean starch, and wheat starch have low consistency and are not easy to expand, stiffen, and aging. The waste textile-starch mixture based on cassava starch, potato starch, sweet potato starch, and glutinous rice flour, although difficult to manage in morphology, shows greater expansibility and a more porous structure. This phenomenon provides a variety of options for the development of design applications. This characteristic enables the design scheme to prepare composite materials for design by blending different kinds of starch according to different design requirements based on sustainable environmental protection characteristics.

3.1.3. Influence of Material Composition Ratio on Waste-Textiles Starch Mixture

The status of the waste-textiles starch mixture created by various percentages of textile fiber, starch, and water was experimentally tested, as shown in Table 4. Results that cannot be created or have a minor difference are not displayed here. Although these proportions can produce solid blocks, the experimental results reveal that 1:2:3 and 1:4:4 proportions can provide a superior quality finished products and are easier to convert into a more fixed shape. Simultaneously, when the design requires the use of solid materials, the ratio of 1:2:3 can be used for manufacturing; when the design requires the use of loose, porous, thick, and light materials, the ratio of 1:4:4 can be employed.
Meanwhile, although the material has a porous structure, the internal structure of mixtures created with varying proportions and constituents differs. Figure 3a–c depict the cross-sections of the compound formed by combining cloth, starch, and water in varying proportions. Figure 3d depicts the fabric, starch, water, and diatomaceous earth mixture. As depicted in the figure, the cut surface of the 1:2:3 ratio is relatively compact, with few pores, and smooth and flat (Figure 3a); the cut surface of the 1:4:4 ratio has more pores and uniform distribution, with a slightly rough texture (Figure 3b); the cut surface of the 1:6:6 ratio has significant and many pores with uneven size distribution (Figure 3c); and the cut surface of the 1:6:10:6 ratio is hollow inside, with tiny pores of varying size. Diatomaceous earth composite materials were distinct (Figure 3d). Different ratios and compositions of materials have their properties, can suit various design requirements, and can be selected based on the use case. The 1:2:3 and 1:4:4 ratios have greater economic efficiency and resource conservation in terms of cost and resource use.

3.1.4. Effect of Different Waste Textile on Starch Composites

Waste textiles are the main component of waste textile-starch mixtures; therefore, different types of waste textiles will also affect the performance of waste textile-starch mixtures. Due to the wide variety of fabrics, it is difficult to determine the composition of recycled waste fabrics, and there are no strict requirements for the composition of fabrics processed by materials. Therefore, in this study, they are roughly divided into fabrics that are easy to decompose into fibers and fabrics that are not easy to decompose into fibers. The experimental results in Table 5 show that the starch distribution of the fabric that is easily decomposed into fiber is uniform, and the bottom is flat; the starch distribution of the fabric that is not easily decomposed into fiber is uneven, and the bottom is easily sunken upward in the middle. Among them, the fabrics of the fourth and seventh experimental samples were tough to be decomposed into fiber-like fabrics, and the surface of the finished materials produced could be seen as many flaky rags as possible with unique textures and appearances.

3.1.5. Study of Different Forms of Waste Textile-Starch Mixtures

According to Table 6, the state of the waste textile-starch mixture in different forms was investigated by experiments. The experiments showed that the transformation of composite material from semi-solid to solid can be molded with the aid of different-shaped molds that have the properties of high plasticity and ease of molding and can match a variety of design specifications. If they can withstand microwaveable heating and are easy to release, a variety of mold materials are available, including PET resin, polyethylene, silicone, and others. Depending on the result, puffing can be followed by a second shaping using mechanical cutting, grinding, or other cold processing techniques. This feature greatly expands the freedom of design and can make the design scheme more diversified and more prosperous.

3.1.6. Mechanical State Assessment of Waste Textile-Starch Blends

The different material mechanical states were further evaluated experimentally in Figure 4 and Table 7.
Although the volume, appearance, and internal structure of the microwave-expanded material of starch and textile fiber were comparable to those of the microwave-expanded product of a single starch, the waste textile-starch mixture was significantly denser and more rigid than the single starch material. After microwaving a single starch, the solid becomes more brittle, porous, and readily crushed (Figure 4). Due to the mechanical qualities of textile fibers, such as increased strength, the addition of textile fibers can significantly increase their hardness and strength, making them more durable and less prone to damage. Hardness tests were performed by using Shore C Durometer for different starch composites, fiber-based textile composites, and sheet-based textile composites. Each sample was evaluated five times independently, and the mean value was determined (Table 7). The test findings revealed that the hardness of the various types varied slightly, but nearly all the composites had a hardness greater than 95 (HC). Therefore, the starchy textile fiber substance is adequately rigid for designing different things.

3.1.7. Testing of Additional Properties of Waste Textile-Starch Composites by Mixing Other Auxiliary Materials

In addition to starch, the material can be supplemented with other ingredients as required. For example, activated carbon, diatomaceous earth, and activated carbon plus diatomaceous earth are added additionally in Figure 5a–c, respectively. Activated carbon itself, with countless tiny pores, has the function of physical adsorption and chemical adsorption, which can play the role of adsorbing harmful substances and purifying the air, and deodorizing [98]. Diatomaceous earth also has strong adsorption, lightweight and high-impact strength, and compressive strength [99]. The addition of these two substances can enhance this material’s adsorption capacity and strength, which can be applied in fields such as air purification.

3.1.8. Sustainability Analysis

According to Table 8, the recyclability of waste textile-starch composites is further understood through experiments. When the waste textile-starch composites are wasted after use, the material can be decomposed by rinsing and soaking to separate the starch soaked in the wrapped fiber fabric. The research found that this mixture sample becomes loose when soaked in water for more than 24 h, and the soaked starch appears as a solid gel that can be separated from the fabric fibers by squeezing, and the residual starch gel does not affect the secondary production. The longer the soaking time, the higher the starch gel fractionation. In the experiments, soaking in cold and hot water was tried separately, and it was found that the starch dissolved more rapidly in hot water but formed a more pronounced gel and did not separate easily from the fibers compared to cold water soaking. The separated fabric fibers could be reused by forming a mixture with new starch and reusing it (Figure 6).
Therefore, a waste textiles-starch mixture is a sustainable material composed of waste textiles and plant starch. Figure 7 shows the whole life cycle of the waste textiles-starch mixture, from the recycling of waste textiles to the processing and manufacturing of composite materials, to the recycling and remanufacturing, to the de-composition and grading of products after they are no longer helpful. The whole production process is non-toxic and harmless and emits no pollution to the environment.

3.2. Furniture Design Applications

3.2.1. Exploring How to Achieve Sustainable Furniture Design According to the Material Properties

According to the above research, the various excellent properties of waste textiles–starch composites, such as rigidity, strength, degradability, and adsorption capacity, can be used for the sustainable design of furniture following the principle of design to reduce the waste of natural resources of furniture and the problem that waste furniture cannot be recycled. This is a sustainable material-driven design process. It emphasizes the use of the material itself to its full advantage and significantly impacts the product’s appearance, structure, and function.
The waste textiles-starch composites have the fabric’s natural texture, and their appearance is slightly rough. The designer can keep the rough surface or make it smooth by grinding and polishing. Because this material is composed of textile fibers, it can also visually represent textiles’ softness and warmth retention. Starch fabric composite is a solid porous material with high strength and bearing capacity, which is suitable for the structural requirements of furniture. In addition to these essential qualities, variable proportions, starch, and additives make these materials slightly different and can meet the different needs of furniture design. Additionally, due to their porosity, waste textiles-starch composites have the functions of sound absorption, lightweight, and heat insulation. In terms of sustainability, the material is non-toxic, pollution-free, and recyclable to achieve sustainability. Therefore, in the process of product assembly and application, the use of non-degradable and toxic adhesives or coatings should be avoided so that the product’s sustainability is not a gimmick but an actual green environmental protection product. This design can use integral furniture, mortise and tenon, modular design, and other structures that do not need adhesives. When the adhesive is needed, starch gel heated by microwave may be regarded as an adhesive.

3.2.2. Sustainable Furniture Design Sketches and Final Solutions

Based on the evaluation of waste textile-starch composites, it is possible to determine that the material is suitable to produce furniture such as tables, chairs, cabinets, shelves, and wall decorations. It is also capable of producing dividers, sound-absorbing panels, and sandwich panels. Furthermore, given the drawback that the material should not be immersed in water for an extended period, the design strategy chose to make furniture such as interior tables and chairs the representative design item. Because the design application technique must avoid the use of chemical gums and other non-environmental and non-biodegradable materials, the design solution employs a one-piece shape with nested and bracketed top and bottom structures. Through the attempts in the design process, as shown in Figure 8, the design scheme finally pushed out several sets of relatively reasonable drafts.
Similarly, in this design plan, waste textiles-starch composites are combined with glass and aluminum alloy to complement and increase some functions that this material cannot perform. It also improves the aesthetics and structural integrity of the finished furniture. Furthermore, glass and aluminum alloy are environmentally friendly materials that can be recycled and reused. As a result, all the materials used in this product meet the sustainable aims and requirements. The result of the design plan was given after modification and refining, as shown in Figure 9.

3.3. Discussion

The life cycle of waste textile composite material products can go through several cycles. Maximizing the value of waste textiles and substituting furniture for other materials can successfully limit the use of non-environmental materials while also reducing the exploitation of natural materials such as wood and stone. However, due to the limitations, this study remains insufficient. The composite materials examined in this study cannot be considered eco-sustainable in the strictest sense, because no matter how many times waste textiles are recycled, they must eventually deteriorate. There may be chemical gases and remnant non-degradable fibers produced during breakdown. When utilizing molds to create composites, there is a certain amount of waste. Currently, the ecological recycling path of waste textiles is still being investigated and requires ongoing improvement and refinement based on experience. This material’s design technique may have importance and value for sustainable design. However, the path to sustainability requires the continued support and efforts of the government, businesses, society, designers, and the public to advance.
Meanwhile, although there will be some physical and chemical processes for recycling and decomposing waste textiles, it is believed that with the continuous progress of technology, more effective and sustainable treatment methods will emerge. For designers, what they can do is maximize the service life of waste textiles-starch materials and make full use of them. Waste textiles-starch composites can replace some wood, panel, stone, and synthetic materials in furniture, industrial products, and even structures, thus reducing human use of the earth’s resources and contributing to ecological sustainability.

4. Conclusions

This study discusses the research of waste textiles reuse based on sustainable design. The research was supplemented by methods and results in the fields of material science, physics, food processing, etc., to check and verify the sustainability and various advantages of waste textile-starch composite materials. For example, based on sustainability and environmental protection, customized composite materials can be provided according to the design requirements by regulating the heating time, starch type, waste textiles type, material composition proportion, and material form. At the same time, the strength of composite materials can also meet the requirements of various design objectives. Therefore, the waste textile-starch composite produced is applied to furniture design. It can not only save the raw material resources of furniture manufacturing but also reduce the waste of resources caused by the waste of furniture. More importantly, it further solves the problem of harmful substance pollution in the process of furniture production. In addition, this study better studies the design and use situation of materials according to their characteristics and better implements the principle of sustainable resource utilization. However, this composite material still needs to be improved in many aspects, and its role is still limited in the face of a large amount of textile waste. However, we believe that with this as the cornerstone and the continuous development of the sustainable concept, more and better solutions will emerge in the future. The establishment of a community with a shared future for humankind is not just a word; it should be engraved in our minds so that we can work together to protect our lovely planet. We will achieve ecological, social, and economic sustainability as soon as possible.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W.; methodology, Y.W., C.L., and X.Z.; validation, Y.W.; investigation, Y.W.; writing—original draft, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, C.L., X.Z., and S.Z.; supervision, C.L. and S.Z.; project administration, S.Z.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely grateful for the anonymous valuable comments on improving the quality of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jabareen, Y. A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2008, 10, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rogers, P.P.; Jalal, K.F.; Boyd, J.A. An Introduction to Sustainable Development; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2012; ISBN 1-84977-047-6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gong, J.; You, F. Sustainable Design and Synthesis of Energy Systems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2015, 10, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Stanescu, M.D. State of the Art of Post-Consumer Textile Waste Upcycling to Reach the Zero Waste Milestone. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 14253–14270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Statistics on the Output of Major Chemical Fiber Products in China in 2021. (n.d.). Available online: https://www.chinabaogao.com/data/202204/587963.html (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  6. Xia, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, W. The indirect carbon emission from household consumption in China between 1995–2009 and 2010–2030: A decomposition and prediction analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 128, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nørup, N.; Pihl, K.; Damgaard, A.; Scheutz, C. Evaluation of a European Textile Sorting Centre: Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Inventory. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 143, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rebitzer, G.; Ekvall, T.; Frischknecht, R.; Hunkeler, D.; Norris, G.; Rydberg, T.; Schmidt, W.-P.; Suh, S.; Weidema, B.P.; Pennington, D.W. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 701–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Woolridge, A.C.; Ward, G.D.; Phillips, P.S.; Collins, M.; Gandy, S. Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006, 46, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hur, E. Rebirth fashion: Secondhand clothing consumption values and perceived risks. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amicarelli, V.; Bux, C.; Spinelli, M.P.; Lagioia, G. Life cycle assessment to tackle the take-make-waste paradigm in the textiles production. Waste Manag. 2022, 151, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rani, S.; Jamal, Z. Recycling of textiles waste for environmental protection. Int. J. Home Sci. 2018, 4, 164–168. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chapman, J. Designers Visionaries and Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vavik, T.; Keitsch, M.M. Exploring relationships between universal design and social sustainable development: Some methodological aspects to the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. The China Recycling Association Issued a White Paper Entitled “Progress of Recycling Technology of Waste Textiles in China”. 2019. Available online: https://www.sohu.com/a/343373604_745358 (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  16. Muthu, S.S.; Li, Y.; Hu, J.Y.; Ze, L. Carbon footprint reduction in the textile process chain: Recycling of textile materials. Fibers Polym. 2012, 13, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bartl, A. Textile waste. In Waste; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 167–179. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rasheed, A. Classification of Technical Textiles. In Fibers for Technical Textiles; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muthu, S.S. Comparative life cycle assessment of natural and man-made textiles. In Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing; Woodhead Publishing in association with the Textile Institute: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  20. Roy Choudhury, A.K. Environmental Impacts of the Textile Industry and Its Assessment through Life Cycle Assessment. Roadmap to Sustainable Textiles and Clothing: Environmental and Social Aspects of Textiles and Clothing Supply Chain; Springer: Singapore, 2014; pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  21. David, S.K.; Pailthorpe, M.T. Classification of textile fibres: Production, structure, and properties. In Forensic Examination of Fibres; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  22. DeVoy, J.E.; Congiusta, E.; Lundberg, D.J.; Findeisen, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Post-Consumer textile waste and disposal: Differences by socioeconomic, demographic, and retail factors. Waste Manag. 2021, 136, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bahman, N.; Alalaiwat, D.; Abdulmohsen, Z.; Al Khalifa, M.; Al Baharna, S.; Al-Mannai, M.A.; Younis, A. A critical review on global CO2 emission: Where do industries stand? Rev. Environ. Health 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jäämaa, L.; Kaipia, R. The first mile problem in the circular economy supply chains—Collecting recyclable textiles from consumers. Waste Manag. 2022, 141, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Ding, X. Textile supply chain waste management in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 289, 125147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chavan, R.B. Environmental sustainability through textile recycling. J. Text. Sci. Eng. S 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cristóvão, R.O.; Amaral, P.F.; Tavares, A.P.; Coelho, M.A.; Cammarota, M.C.; Loureiro, J.M.; Boaventura, R.A.; Macedo, E.A.; Pessoa, F.L. Optimization of laccase catalyzed degradation of reactive textile dyes in supercritical carbon dioxide medium by response surface methodology. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2010, 99, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Robinson, E. Textile Recycling via Ionic Liquids. 2020. Available online: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/46257 (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  29. Kaabel, S.; Arciszewski, J.; Borchers, T.H.; Therien, J.D.; Friščić, T.; Auclair, K. Solid-State Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Mixed PET/Cotton Textiles. ChemSusChem 2023, 16, e202201613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Urinov, E.; Hanstein, S.; Weidenkaff, A. Enzymatic Degradation of Fiber-Reinforced PLA Composite Material. Macromol 2022, 2, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rathinamoorthy, R. Clothing Disposal and Sustainability. In Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry; Muthu, S., Gardetti, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tanrisever, S. A sustainable design technique for recycling of waste clothes. Macrotheme Rev. 2015, 4, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
  33. Şener, T.; Bişkin, F.; Dündar, N. The effects of perceived value, environmental concern and attitude on recycled fashion consumption. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2022, 1–17, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Larson, A.; York, J. Nike: Moving Down the Sustainability Track through Chemical Substitution and Waste Reduction; Darden Business Publishing: Charlottesville, VA, USA, 2017; Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1278411 (accessed on 12 January 2023).
  35. Carlota, R. Charlotte Street. Available online: https://www.ruacarlota.com/pages/about (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  36. EVERLANE. Environmental Initiatives. Available online: https://www.everlane.com/sustainability (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  37. Baserange. Available online: https://directory.goodonyou.eco/brand/baserange (accessed on 18 November 2022).
  38. Circularity and Waste. Available online: https://www.gapinc.com/en-us/values/sustainability/enriching-communities/circularity-and-waste (accessed on 21 November 2022).
  39. Sustainability Report. 27 September 2022. Available online: https://www.levistrauss.com/sustainability-report/ (accessed on 21 November 2022).
  40. Wear the Change. Sustainability. 20 October 2022. Available online: https://www.c-and-a.com/uk/en/corporate/company/sustainability/ (accessed on 15 February 2023).
  41. Sustainability. Available online: https://www.inditex.cn/itxcomweb/en/sustainability (accessed on 21 November 2022).
  42. Sustainability. Sustainability Strategy. Available online: https://www.nudiejeans.com/sustainability/sustainability-strategy/ (accessed on 21 November 2022).
  43. Öndoğan, E.N.; Öndoğan, Z.; Topuzoğlu, B. A Study on the Investigation of Sustainability Practices of Global Brands in the Fashion Market. Ege Acad. Rev. 2022, 22, 393–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. EEB. Report on the Circular Economy in the Furniture Sector. Available online: https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Report-on-the-Circular-Economy-in-the-Furniture-Sector.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  45. Handkrafted. Australia’s Underground Furniture Movement. 2015. Available online: https://blog.handkrafted.com/landfill-australias-underground-furniture-movement/ (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  46. Xiong, X.; Ma, Q.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, M. Current situation and key manufacturing considerations of green furniture in China: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 267, 121957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Daian, G.; Ozarska, B. Wood waste management practices and strategies to increase sustainability standards in the Australian wooden furniture manufacturing sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 1594–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiong, X.; Yue, X.; Dong, W.; Xu, Z. Current status and system construction of used-furniture recycling in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 82729–82739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Recycle Track Systems. Furniture Waste—The Forgotten Waste Stream. 2020. Available online: https://www.rts.com/blog/furniture-waste-a-growing-issue/ (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  50. Dotson, S. Green furniture: An assesment of furniture society member work. J. Green Build. 2015, 10, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Parikka-Alhola, K. Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68, 472–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. IKEA. Fresh Home Furnishing Ideas and Affordable Furniture. Available online: https://www.ikea.com/gb/en/ (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  53. Bumgardner, M.S.; Nicholls, D.L. Sustainable practices in furniture design: A literature study on customization, biomimicry, competitiveness, and product communication. Forests 2020, 11, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Iritani, D.R.; Silva, D.L.; Saavedra, Y.M.B.; Grael, P.F.F.; Ometto, A.R. Sustainable strategies analysis through Life Cycle Assessment: A case study in a furniture industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 96, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Clark, G.; Kosoris, J.; Hong, L.N.; Crul, M. Design for sustainability: Current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability 2009, 1, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Al Qahtani, S.; Al Wuhayb, F.; Manaa, H.; Younis, A.; Sehar, S. Environmental impact assessment of plastic waste during the outbreak of COVID-19 and integrated strategies for its control and mitigation. Rev. Environ. Health 2022, 37, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Echeverria, C.A.; Pahlevani, F.; Sahajwalla, V. Valorisation of waste nonwoven polypropylene as potential matrix-phase for thermoplastic-lignocellulose hybrid material engineered for building applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sahajwalla, V. Big challenges, micro solutions: Closing the loop in Australia’s waste crisis. AQ-Aust. Q. 2018, 89, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kamble, Z.; Behera, B.K. Sustainable hybrid composites reinforced with textile waste for construction and building applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 284, 122800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rezign® Veneer: Sustainable Materials: Innovative Veneer. Available online: https://www.planqproducts.com/rezign-recycled-veneer (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  61. Denimx. 2019. Available online: https://materialdistrict.com/material/denimx/#moved (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  62. Bossel, H. Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications; International Institute for Sustainable Development: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1999; p. 138. [Google Scholar]
  63. Jain, P.; Gupta, C. Textile recycling practices in Índia: A review. Int. J. Text. Fash. Technol. 2016, 6, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  64. Williams, D.E. Sustainable Design: Ecology, Architecture, and Planning; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  65. DeKay, M. Integral Sustainable Design: Transformative Perspectives; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  66. Baldassarre, B.; Keskin, D.; Diehl, J.C.; Bocken, N.; Calabretta, G. Implementing sustainable design theory in business practice: A call to action. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. He, B.; Li, F.; Cao, X.; Li, T. Product sustainable design: A review from the environmental, economic, and social aspects. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng 2020, 20, 040801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Glicksman, L.; Lin, J. (Eds.) Sustainable Urban Housing in China: Principles and Case Studies for Low-Energy Design; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
  69. Polyportis, A.; Mugge, R.; Magnier, L. Consumer acceptance of products made from recycled materials: A scoping review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 186, 106533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Anstine, J. Consumers’ willingness to pay for recycled content in plastic kitchen garbage bags: A hedonic price approach. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2000, 7, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bhamra, T.; Hon, B. Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development, 2004: 1st-2nd September 2004 at Burleigh Court, Loughborough University, UK; Professional Engineering Pub.: Singapore, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  72. Silva, A.; Rosano, M.; Stocker, L.; Gorissen, L. From waste to sustainable materials management: Three case studies of the transition journey. Waste Manag. 2017, 61, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Karthik, T.; Rathinamoorthy, R.; Ganesan, P. Sustainable luxury natural fibers—Production, properties, and prospects. In Handbook of Sustainable Luxury Textiles and Fashion; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 1, pp. 59–98. [Google Scholar]
  74. Copeland, L.; Blazek, J.; Salman, H.; Tang, M.C. Form and functionality of starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2009, 23, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ratnayake, W.S.; Jackson, D.S. Starch gelatinization. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2008, 55, 221–268. [Google Scholar]
  76. Evans, I.D.; Lips, A. Viscoelasticity of gelatinized starch dispersions. J. Text. Stud. 1992, 23, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Morris, V.J. Starch gelation and retrogradation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1990, 1, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Buléon, A.; Colonna, P.; Planchot, V.; Ball, S. Starch granules: Structure and biosynthesis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1998, 23, 85–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. BeMiller, J.N. Pasting, paste, and gel properties of starch–hydrocolloid combinations. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 386–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cai, C.; Wei, C. In situ observation of crystallinity disruption patterns during starch gelatinization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mishra, S.; Rai, T. Morphology and functional properties of corn, potato and tapioca starches. Food Hydrocoll. 2006, 20, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Singh, N.; Singh, J.; Kaur, L.; Sodhi, N.S.; Gill, B.S. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches from different botanical sources. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lentz, R.R.; Tang, J.; Resurreccion, F.P., Jr. Electromagnetic basis of microwave heating. In Development of Packaging and Products for Use in Microwave Ovens; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2020; pp. 3–71. [Google Scholar]
  84. Goldblith, S.A. Basic principles of microwaves and recent developments. Adv. Food Res. 1996, 15, 277–301. [Google Scholar]
  85. Orsat, V.; Raghavan, V.; Meda, V. Microwave technology for food processing: An overview. In The Microwave Processing of Foods; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2005; pp. 105–118. [Google Scholar]
  86. Raaholt, B.W.; Holtz, E.; Isaksson, S.; Ahrné, L. Application of microwave technology in food preservation and processing. In Conventional and Advanced Food Processing Technologies; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 437–470. [Google Scholar]
  87. Pompe, R.; Briesen, H.; Datta, A.K. Understanding puffing in a domestic microwave oven. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rakesh, V.; Datta, A. Microwave puffing: Mathematical modeling and optimization. Procedia Food Sci. 2011, 1, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Khan, A.S. Microwave Engineering Concepts and Fundamentals; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  90. Metaxas, A.C. Microwave heating. Power Eng J. 1991, 5, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rohrer, M.D.; Bulard, R.A. Microwave sterilization. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1985, 110, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lewicka, K.; Siemion, P.; Kurcok, P. Chemical modifications of starch: Microwave effect. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015, 2015, 867697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tao, Y.; Yan, B.; Fan, D.; Zhang, N.; Ma, S.; Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H. Structural changes of starch subjected to microwave heating: A review from the perspective of dielectric properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ndife, M.; Şumnu, G.; Bayındırlı, L. Differential scanning calorimetry determination of gelatinization rates in different starches due to microwave heating. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 31, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zylema, B.J.; Grider, J.A.; Gordon, J.; Davis, E.A. Model wheat starch systems heated by microwave irradiation and conduction with equalized heating times. Cereal Chem. 1985, 62, 447–453. [Google Scholar]
  96. Lewandowicz, G.; Fornal, J.; Walkowski, A. Effect of microwave radiation on physico-chemical properties and structure of potato and tapioca starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 1997, 34, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Stevenson, D.G.; Biswas, A.; Inglett, G.E. Thermal and pasting properties of microwaved corn starch. Starch-Stärke 2005, 57, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bansal, R.C.; Goyal, M. Activated Carbon Adsorption; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ivanov S, É.; Belyakov, A.V. Diatomite and its applications. Glass Ceram. 2008, 65, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sustainable design solution flowchart.
Figure 1. Sustainable design solution flowchart.
Sustainability 15 03601 g001
Figure 2. Material manufacturing steps.
Figure 2. Material manufacturing steps.
Sustainability 15 03601 g002
Figure 3. Profiles of different scale composites. (a) 1:2:3 ratio. (b) 1:4:4 ratio. (c) 1:6:7 ratio. (d) 1:6:10:6 ratio.
Figure 3. Profiles of different scale composites. (a) 1:2:3 ratio. (b) 1:4:4 ratio. (c) 1:6:7 ratio. (d) 1:6:10:6 ratio.
Sustainability 15 03601 g003
Figure 4. The shape of Single starch microwave expanded solid.
Figure 4. The shape of Single starch microwave expanded solid.
Sustainability 15 03601 g004
Figure 5. Samples of composite materials were added with activated carbon (a), diatomaceous earth (b), and a mixture of activated carbon and diatomaceous earth (c), respectively.
Figure 5. Samples of composite materials were added with activated carbon (a), diatomaceous earth (b), and a mixture of activated carbon and diatomaceous earth (c), respectively.
Sustainability 15 03601 g005
Figure 6. The sample of waste textile-starch composite material after being decomposed into materials. (a) front; (b) back.
Figure 6. The sample of waste textile-starch composite material after being decomposed into materials. (a) front; (b) back.
Sustainability 15 03601 g006
Figure 7. Illustration of the life cycle of waste textile-starch composites.
Figure 7. Illustration of the life cycle of waste textile-starch composites.
Sustainability 15 03601 g007
Figure 8. Three sustainable furniture design sketches designed by a one-piece shape and nested and bracketed top and bottom structures. (a) table design sketch; (b) chair design sketch; (c) tea table design sketch.
Figure 8. Three sustainable furniture design sketches designed by a one-piece shape and nested and bracketed top and bottom structures. (a) table design sketch; (b) chair design sketch; (c) tea table design sketch.
Sustainability 15 03601 g008
Figure 9. Final renderings of sustainable furniture design. Table based on starch composite integrated molding and glass design (top); lying chair (middle) and tea table (bottom) based on starch composite integrated molding and steel design.
Figure 9. Final renderings of sustainable furniture design. Table based on starch composite integrated molding and glass design (top); lying chair (middle) and tea table (bottom) based on starch composite integrated molding and steel design.
Sustainability 15 03601 g009
Table 1. Experimental equipment.
Table 1. Experimental equipment.
ScissorStirred VesselMuddlerContainerHeated ContainerElectronic ScaleHigh Speed BlenderMicrowave OvenDurometer
Sustainability 15 03601 i001Sustainability 15 03601 i002Sustainability 15 03601 i003Sustainability 15 03601 i004Sustainability 15 03601 i005Sustainability 15 03601 i006Sustainability 15 03601 i007Sustainability 15 03601 i008Sustainability 15 03601 i009
Table 2. State change of waste textile-starch mixture under different heating time.
Table 2. State change of waste textile-starch mixture under different heating time.
TimeStatus Change
1 minThe starch gelatinizes, and the outside of the wrapped fabric begins to dry.
2 minThe starch gel becomes translucent, starts to expand, gets larger, and still has much water in it.
3 minAs the mixture continues to grow, the surface becomes essentially dry, soft, and elastic, with many tiny bubbles.
4 minThe mixture stops getting more extensive and basically dries and hardens.
5 minThe mixture is dry and firm.
6 min or moreThe water has evaporated, and continued heating will start to scorch from the middle and bottom.
Note: This test uses 5 g of fabric 20 g of starch 20 g of water as the sample.
Table 3. Microwave swelling effect of different kinds of starch and the same textile fiber in the same ratio.
Table 3. Microwave swelling effect of different kinds of starch and the same textile fiber in the same ratio.
Pea StarchCorn StarchMung Bean StarchWheat StarchCassava StarchPotato StarchSweet
Potato Starch
Glutinous Rice Flour
Types of StarchSustainability 15 03601 i010Sustainability 15 03601 i011Sustainability 15 03601 i012Sustainability 15 03601 i013Sustainability 15 03601 i014Sustainability 15 03601 i015Sustainability 15 03601 i016Sustainability 15 03601 i017
Textile PiecesSustainability 15 03601 i018Sustainability 15 03601 i019Sustainability 15 03601 i020Sustainability 15 03601 i021Sustainability 15 03601 i022Sustainability 15 03601 i023Sustainability 15 03601 i024Sustainability 15 03601 i025
Hybrid MaterialsSustainability 15 03601 i026Sustainability 15 03601 i027Sustainability 15 03601 i028Sustainability 15 03601 i029Sustainability 15 03601 i030Sustainability 15 03601 i031Sustainability 15 03601 i032Sustainability 15 03601 i033
CharacteristicSlightly inflated, tasteless and expensiveSlightly swollen, a little odor, smooth sidesDilation, tasteless, smooth on the sides, expensiveSlightly inflated, tastelessLarge expansion, bottom center depression, tasteless, porousLarge expansion, bottom center depression, tasteless, porous, a little odorLarge expansion, bottom center depression, tasteless, porousLarge expansion, odorless, porous, enquiring more moisture and heating time
Weight34.1 g34.7 g34.7 g34.0 g35.2 g35.1 g34.8 g34.6 g
Table 4. Experimental effects of different ratios of textile fiber, starch, and water.
Table 4. Experimental effects of different ratios of textile fiber, starch, and water.
Ratio1:1:21:2:31:3:32:1:32:2:31:4:41:5:51:7:7
MixtureSustainability 15 03601 i034Sustainability 15 03601 i035Sustainability 15 03601 i036Sustainability 15 03601 i037Sustainability 15 03601 i038Sustainability 15 03601 i039Sustainability 15 03601 i040Sustainability 15 03601 i041
CharacteristicSlightly loose edges, no expansionSturdy and firm, no expansionSturdy and firm, slightly expandedLoose edges, no expansionThe edges are not firm, no expansionSturdy and strong, InflationFirm, Inflation, slightly hollow at the bottom, starchy on the outsideLarge expansion, slightly hollow at the bottom, too much starch on the outside
Weight9.2 g15.5 g26.0 g13.9 g13.3 g28.6 g34.8 g45.2 g
Table 5. The microwave puffing effect of different waste textiles and the same proportion of starch.
Table 5. The microwave puffing effect of different waste textiles and the same proportion of starch.
ABCDEFGHI
TextileSustainability 15 03601 i042Sustainability 15 03601 i043Sustainability 15 03601 i044Sustainability 15 03601 i045Sustainability 15 03601 i046Sustainability 15 03601 i047Sustainability 15 03601 i048Sustainability 15 03601 i049Sustainability 15 03601 i050
Broken Sustainability 15 03601 i051Sustainability 15 03601 i052Sustainability 15 03601 i053Sustainability 15 03601 i054Sustainability 15 03601 i055Sustainability 15 03601 i056Sustainability 15 03601 i057Sustainability 15 03601 i058Sustainability 15 03601 i059
The top of the mixtureSustainability 15 03601 i060Sustainability 15 03601 i061Sustainability 15 03601 i062Sustainability 15 03601 i063Sustainability 15 03601 i064Sustainability 15 03601 i065Sustainability 15 03601 i066Sustainability 15 03601 i067Sustainability 15 03601 i068
The bottom of the mixtureSustainability 15 03601 i069Sustainability 15 03601 i070Sustainability 15 03601 i071Sustainability 15 03601 i072Sustainability 15 03601 i073Sustainability 15 03601 i074Sustainability 15 03601 i075Sustainability 15 03601 i076Sustainability 15 03601 i077
Charact-eristicEasy decomposition into fibers, uniform distribution of starch in the mixed material, flat bottomEasy decomposition into fibers, uniform distribution of starch in the mixed material, flat bottomEasy decomposition into fibers, uniform distribution of starch in the mixed material, flat bottomNot easily decomposed into fibers, uneven distribution of starch in the mixed material, concave in the middle of the bottomNot easily decomposed into fibers, uneven distribution of starch in the mixed material, concave in the middle of the bottomNot easily decomposed into fibers, slightly uneven distribution of starch in the mix, slightly concave in the middle of the bottomNot easily decomposed into fibers, uneven distribution of starch in the mixed material, concave in the middle of the bottomEasy decomposition into fibers, uniform distribution of starch in the mixed material, flat bottomNot easily decomposed into fibers, slightly uneven distribution of starch in the mix, slightly concave in the middle of the bottom
Weight26.4 g27.6 g28.3 g24.6 g25.1 g26.4 g25.7 g25.2 g35.3 g
Table 6. Morphological analysis of waste textile-starch mixture.
Table 6. Morphological analysis of waste textile-starch mixture.
SamplesFormManufacture MethodCharacteristicAvailability
Sustainability 15 03601 i078Irregular arcsMold shapingSimple shape, easy to shapeHigh
Sustainability 15 03601 i079Multiple arcsMold shapingSimple shape, easy to shapeHigh
Sustainability 15 03601 i080Arc + straight shapeMold shaping + cuttingSecondary processing after formingHigh
Sustainability 15 03601 i081Arc bottom columnarCling film + mold shapingShape can be controlled, easy to shapeHigh
Sustainability 15 03601 i082Rod-likeMold shapingShape is not easy to control, can be out of shapeLow
Sustainability 15 03601 i083Cylindrical, cup-shapedDouble mold shapingEasy to formMedium
Table 7. Shore C Durometer measurement results.
Table 7. Shore C Durometer measurement results.
Only
Starch
Pea Starch MixtureCorn Starch MixtureMung Bean Starch MixtureWheat Starch MixtureCassava Starch MixturePotato Starch MixtureSweet
Potato Starch Mixture
Glutinous Rice Flour MixtureMixture of FibersFlaky Mixture
Hardness (HC)85.579.593102.59497.5909490.510999
93.5105.595.592.59510097101.51049697
87.590.5107.597.59292.5100.593.597.59999.5
90.5104.5102.59996.5103.510810096.510395.5
91.5105110108.5102.594100105.59510594
Mean Value (HC)89.797101.71009697.5100.998.996.7102.497
Table 8. Material decomposition process.
Table 8. Material decomposition process.
Start of SoakingSoaking 12 hSoaking 24 h (Squeezing)Drying
Soak in cold
water (20 °C)
Sustainability 15 03601 i084Sustainability 15 03601 i085Sustainability 15 03601 i086Sustainability 15 03601 i087
Soaking in hot water (100 °C)Sustainability 15 03601 i088Sustainability 15 03601 i089Sustainability 15 03601 i090Sustainability 15 03601 i091
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, S. Research on Sustainable Furniture Design Based on Waste Textiles Recycling. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3601. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043601

AMA Style

Wang Y, Liu C, Zhang X, Zeng S. Research on Sustainable Furniture Design Based on Waste Textiles Recycling. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4):3601. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yaolin, Chenyang Liu, Xi Zhang, and Shaoting Zeng. 2023. "Research on Sustainable Furniture Design Based on Waste Textiles Recycling" Sustainability 15, no. 4: 3601. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop