Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

Attached you will find the paper with some required corection. Also...I recomand more detailes regarding

-the value of this "wastes " and the comparison (advantages/ disavantages)  with other valorisation methods.

- the germinations test conditions.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1

Thank you for all the changes and clarifications that really improved the manuscript.

Please see the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Rui Pinto

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is very good and interesting. As a comment, in addition to the membrane that you used to cover the piles, composting time may be reduced by forced aeration and/or compost accelerators.

Only two minor suggestions:

- in the methodology, please specify the period when the study was carried out (month, year)

- Table 4 - specify units for each element to avoid confusion and add a line with limit values allowed by regulations.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2

We would like to thank the reviewers that helped us to improve the manuscript.

Please see the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Rui Pinto

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors, please update your MS acording explanations I have add on MS. Please see yellow colored sections on the MS. Sincerely.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 3

 We hope you find the revised manuscript appropriate for publication in Sustainability.

 Please see the attachment.

Yours sincerely,

Rui Pinto

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper can be published in the present form