Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Feasibility of Using Recycled PET Strips with Palm Leaf Ash for Sustainable Soil Stabilization
Previous Article in Journal
Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Performance through Management Innovation, Information Processing Capability, Business Model Innovation and Knowledge Management Capability in Pakistan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reducing CO2 Emissions and Improving Water Resource Circularity by Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Buildings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in the Optimization of Energy Use in Buildings

1
Department of Energy, System, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy
2
Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13541; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813541
Submission received: 30 August 2023 / Revised: 6 September 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 11 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimization of Energy Use in Buildings)
Buildings are responsible for about 40% of final energy consumptions and 30% of total energy-related CO2 emissions [1]. Approximately 35% of these buildings are more than 50 years old, and almost 75% of them have low energy performance [2]. While the energy efficiency of new buildings has improved over time, existing buildings still offer significant potential for energy savings through modest energy retrofits (up to 60%) or major renovations (between 50% and 80%) [3,4]. For this reason, in recent years, reducing energy needs in the building sector and achieving decarbonization have been defined as priorities in various national and international policy plans, legislative acts, and regulatory documents. Notably, the European Union has issued a series of directives to promote the energy transition by enhancing energy efficiency and mitigating climate change in the construction sector. These policies include a roadmap for reducing energy consumption in new constructions and retrofitting existing buildings [5], measures to encourage building renovations [6], and the integration of renewable energies [7,8]. The net-zero scenario has set ambitious goals to be reached for 2030 [9], which involve a 25% reduction in energy consumption, a decrease of over 40% in the use of fossil fuels, and a phase-out of biomass. These objectives can be pursued through various actions [10]:
  • Improving the energy performance of the building envelope;
  • Selecting efficient appliances, lighting, and air conditioners;
  • Utilizing efficient and clean energy systems, such as heat pumps or district energy;
  • Increasing the use of renewable energies;
  • Enhancing building flexibility in order to adapt to changing energy demands.
By implementing these actions, the building sector can significantly contribute to achieving a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future.
In this context, further research is essential in order to explore innovative methodologies and technologies aimed at minimizing building energy requirements. Several typical systems can contribute to this goal, such as renewable energy sources, smart grid concepts, energy storage technologies, and smart control techniques (like demand–response mechanisms) [11]. However, it is crucial to consider that reducing energy needs cannot be isolated from other important factors, including economic aspects, occupants’ thermal comfort, building design considerations, and the operational limits of technologies that are employed. Given the complexity of factors involved, many analyses in this field can benefit from adopting a multi-objective optimization approach. By considering multiple objectives simultaneously, it becomes possible to strike a balance between various goals and find solutions that are more well rounded and sustainable. Additionally, building standards and regulations play a pivotal role in this domain. When combined with assessments like energy modeling tools, certifications, and green rating systems [11], they offer comprehensive support, guidelines, and instructions for designers and building engineers. These measures ensure the health and well-being of building occupants [12], maintain consistency in construction practices, and promote environmental protection [13]. By adhering to these standards and leveraging assessment tools, professionals can create buildings that are more energy-efficient, environmentally friendly, and user-friendly.
This Special Issue aims to gather scientific contributions focused on enhancing energy efficiency in buildings, particularly emphasizing the optimization of energy usage while considering various constraints, such as economic, architectural, technological, and human comfort factors.
Different contributions were collected. First, Seminara et al. [14] concentrated on building performance evaluation as a crucial aspect in designing sustainable buildings. They proposed a sequence for assessing building performance from a United Kingdom perspective. The authors reviewed various evaluation methods, exploring their relationships, developments, and associated tools. They also emphasized the significance of post-occupancy analysis, highlighting its pivotal role in improving building efficiency while taking into account users’ needs and feedback.
Furthermore, Qiu et al. [15] addressed appropriate operation mechanisms to achieve a correct energy conservation design project. They focused on the optimization and control of chilled water pumps, which are essential components in building cooling systems. The authors proposed a simple and feasible approach based on similarity/affinity laws and pump performance curves. The method was tested on a real cooling system in a battery factory, demonstrating the high accuracy of results (a flow rate estimation error less than 2% and a frequency estimation error less than 1 Hz), significant energy-saving effects (20%), and improved water grid operation conditions (a grid pressure difference reduced by 1.4% and a flow rate reduced by 2.6% compared to pre-intervention conditions).
Moreover, Malatesta et al. [16] explored the inter-relationship between energy systems, home energy demands, and occupant practices. The authors discussed the dynamic interaction between technology, consumers, and policies in creating sustainable and effective energy solutions to address the climate emergency. The review highlighted various personal and social barriers that limit the widespread adoption of renewable energy systems. The authors proposed a framework that can be used to re-evaluate the design of home automation and energy management systems, considering the impacts of different human lifestyles and routines to optimize the use of renewable energies.
Finally, Romano et al. [17] focused on deep-energy zero-emission renovation by enhancing circularity processes for water and energy resources in order to optimize their management within urban districts. They established a method used for evaluating the potential to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions related to water usage and distribution in buildings. This calculation approach was applied to an established urban social housing district in Rome. By implementing a combination of interventions to reduce and control water consumption, in alignment with the green city approach, it was possible to effectively carry out a substantial energy retrofit of the existing building stock. This outcome could significantly help to mitigate the fundamental causes of climatic changes.
These contributions collectively provide valuable insights and solutions for improving energy efficiency in buildings based on a wide range of factors to ensure more sustainable and effective energy use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S. and E.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L.; writing—review and editing, E.S. and E.L.; project administration, E.S. and E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eurostat, Census Hub HC53. 2011. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/CensusHub2/query.do?%0Astep¼selectHyperCube&qhc¼false%0A (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  2. European Commission, Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/energy-performance-buildings-directive_en (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  3. Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE). A Guide to Developing Strategies for Building Energy Renovation; Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE): Brussels, Belgium, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE). Europe’s Buildings under the Microscope; Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE): Brussels, Belgium, 2011; Available online: http://www.bpie.eu/publication/europes-buildings-under-the-microscope (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  5. European Parliament. Directive 2018/844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency. J. Eur. Union 2018, 156, 75–90. [Google Scholar]
  6. European Parliament. Directive 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on Energy Efficiency, Amending Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2018.328.01.0210.01.ENG (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  7. European Parliament. Directive 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2018.328.01.0082.01.ENG (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  8. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21). Renewables 2019 Global Status Report—REN21; Secretariat: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. IEA. Buildings; Tracking Report—September 2022; IEA: Paris, France, 2022; Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/buildings (accessed on 18 May 2023).
  10. Nardi, I.; Lucchi, E. In situ thermal transmittance assessment of the building envelope: Practical advice and outlooks for standard and innovative procedures. Energies 2023, 16, 3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lucchi, E. Renewable Energies and Architectural Heritage: Advanced Solutions and Future Perspectives. Buildings 2023, 13, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lucchi, E.; Buda, A. Urban green rating systems: Insights for balancing sustainable principles and heritage conservation for neighbourhood and cities renovation planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lucchi, E.; Baiani, S.; Altamura, P. Design criteria for the integration of active solar technologies in the historic built environment: Taxonomy of international recommendations. Energy Build. 2023, 278, 112651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seminara, P.; Vand, B.; Sajjadian, S.M.; Tupenaite, L. Assessing and Monitoring of Building Performance by Diverse Methods. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qiu, S.; Li, Z.; Wang, D.; Li, Z.; Tao, Y. Active Optimization of Chilled Water Pump Running Number: Engineering Practice Validation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Malatesta, T.; Morrison, G.M.; Breadsell, J.K.; Eon, C. A Systematic Literature Review of the Interplay between Renewable Energy Systems and Occupant Practices. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romano, G.; Baiani, S.; Mancini, F.; Tucci, F. Reducing CO2 Emissions and Improving Water Resource Circularity by Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schito, E.; Lucchi, E. Advances in the Optimization of Energy Use in Buildings. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813541

AMA Style

Schito E, Lucchi E. Advances in the Optimization of Energy Use in Buildings. Sustainability. 2023; 15(18):13541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schito, Eva, and Elena Lucchi. 2023. "Advances in the Optimization of Energy Use in Buildings" Sustainability 15, no. 18: 13541. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop