How Can Industrial Parks Achieve Carbon Neutrality? Literature Review and Research Prospect Based on the CiteSpace Knowledge Map
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Dear Authors,
In my opinion this manuscript is qualitatively and logically well-structured work.
Nevertheless, I would have a few minor comments, that can be found in the attachment. Please see the attachment.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you very much for your overall evaluation of our manuscript, and we were very encouraged. We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft, the detailed corrections are listed in our attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Paper provides literature review on on carbon neutral industrial pars. This is review paper but author's haven't identified this in template. Also authors need to stress linkages of this paper with sustainability. Another important issue that authors do not provide the future research guidelines based on review of paper conducted. For systematic literature review papers it is necessary. Authors need to provide why this review is necessary and why this paper has been written. In my opinion the final systematization of paper is necessary in order to reveal research gap in study area, therefore I recommend major revision.
Author Response
Thank you for your nice comments on our article. According to your suggestions, we have supplemented several data here and corrected several mistakes in our previous draft. We have made extensive revisions to our previous draft. The detailed point-by-point responses are listed in our attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Please refer to the attachment.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for your precious comments and advice. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have revised the manuscript accordingly，and our point-by-point responses are presented in the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors corrected their paper based on comments of reviewers.The paper can be published in current version as I do not not have more comments. My comments were addressed in revised version and answers to my comments were provided.
Author Response
We are very grateful for your approval of our manuscript revisions and the time you have spent on our work. Your valuable comments have helped us to make meaningful revisions and reflections. With your help, we will make our manuscript better. Thank you again for your suggestions!
Reviewer 3 Report
Please refer to the attachment.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
We are very grateful for your valuable comments on our revisions. We have benefited a lot from your attentiveness and rigor, which will profoundly impact our future academic research. Once again, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to you, and we have carefully reviewed and revised the entire manuscript based on your suggestions. The revisions can be seen in the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
