Next Article in Journal
Transformation of Transnational Corporations’ Supply Chains as a Result of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
Systems Accounting for Carbon Emissions by Hydropower Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Biomass Potential and Utilization in Worldwide Research Trends—A Bibliometric Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Network Embodied in Trade along the Belt and Road: Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring Current Status and Evolutionary Trends on the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources in China: A Bibliometric Perspective

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5516; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095516
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 30 April 2022 / Published: 4 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Energy: Pathways towards Sustainable Development)

Abstract

:
State-owned forest resources occupy an important position in China, and the development of their paid use will help to improve the economic benefits of these resources. For this study, 451 journal documents involving the paid use of state-owned forest resources in the CNKI database of China from 2008 to 2021 were selected as samples. Combining qualitative reviews with quantitative analysis, statistical analysis software was used as an analytical tool. The knowledge maps can be visualized by cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and co-occurrence network analysis. The change laws of this research in the time dimension were obtained using developing trend analysis. The results are as follows: 1. The number of research documents on the paid use of state-owned forest resources is increasing. 2. The core authors account for 29.27%; the research impact is relatively scattered. 3. Research institutions are primarily colleges and universities. 4. The support of provincially funded projects accounts for the highest proportion. 5. There is a relatively stable number of journals in this research field. Forestry Economy, Green Science and Technology and China Forestry Economy are the top three journals in terms of citation impact. 6. The existing research topics mainly focus on the development status of paid use, forest tourism and forest health, and the under-forestry economy (under-forestry planting, breeding, and product processing). 7. The intermediary centralities of state-owned forest farms and under-forestry economy are the highest, followed by forest tourism and forest experience, etc. With time and the promulgation of policies, the research focus in this field has gradually shifted from forest assets and forestry economics to ecotourism and forest health, and research on forest carbon sequestration is a technical branch worthy of attention in the future.

1. Introduction

The purpose of the paid use of state-owned forest resources is to carry out research on forest tourism, forest science education, forest experience, the under-forest economy and economic forest, and timber forest construction, utilizing leasing and franchise right transfer, which is performed to ensure that the ownership of state-owned forest resources remains unchanged. In 2017, the United Nations (UN) approved The UN Strategic Plan for Forests 2017–2030 following The UN Forests Instrument [1,2]. It is proposed to enhance the economic, social, and environmental benefits of forests, improve forest-based livelihoods, and contribute to economic development. The implementation of this document is critical to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [3]. In 2017, China promulgated the Guiding Opinions on the Reform of the System for the Paid Use of Natural Resource Assets Owned by the Whole People, which proposed to establish a system for the paid use of natural resource assets owned by the people with clear property rights, abundant powers, perfect rules, effective supervision, and the implementation of rights and interests [4].
Forest resources provide a series of tangible and intangible services for human beings, such as water conservation, forest recreation, and forest science education [5]. According to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 issued by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the global forest area for paid use is as follows: around 1.15 billion hectares of forests worldwide were mainly used for the production of wood and non-timber forest products, and 186 million hectares of forests were designated for social services, such as recreation, tourism, educational research, and cultural and spiritual heritage protection. Since 2010, forest designated for this purpose has grown by 186,000 hectares per year [6]. The forest resource area in China ranked fifth in the world, with a forest area of 220.446 million hectares, and a forest stock of 17.56 billion cubic meters, in 2020 [6]. The area of state-owned forest resources in China was 84.366 million hectares, accounting for 38.66%, and the stock of these resources was 10.123 billion cubic meters, accounting for 59.34% [7]. It can be seen that state-owned forest resources occupy an important position in China. In 2020, China promulgated the policy documents related to state-owned forest resources. It pointed out that the system for the paid use of forest resources should be improved and the price mechanism of forest resources should be innovated and improved [8]. In 2021, the government of China pointed out that it was important to establish and improve the property rights system of natural resource assets while improving the system for the paid use of forest resources.
This is a critical period for the reform of the paid use of China’s state-owned forest resources. A systematic review and a summary of the literature in this field are of practical significance for scientifically inspiring future research and reform practices. The paid use of state-owned forest resources is closely related to sustainable forest management. Sustainable management has different degrees of impact on economic, ecological, and social benefits by aggregating various commodities and services of different natures in forest management [9,10]. Paid use can improve the economic and social benefits of a forest ecosystem, and improve the economic conditions of those who rely on forests for a living. researchers can evaluate the economic benefits of symbiosis in the forestry industry through an optimization model [11]. In addition, the paid use is related to property rights and forest livelihoods. Effective institutional property rights can weaken the “Tragedy of the Commons” [12]. Combined with institutional economics, forest property rights, and the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF), the mechanism of the interaction between forest property rights and forest livelihoods in paid use can be explored [13]. Moreover, a Contract Management Responsibility System (CMR) can be implemented in state-owned forest areas, which can significantly increase the income of forest-based households [14,15].
There are multiple stakeholders in the management of paid forest use: not only the state, forestry-related departments, and residents but also local communities, processing companies, and tourism-related associations. Combining information technology with forest management can better serve the multiple stakeholders of forests [16,17]. Using a balance sheet of natural resources to more clearly understand the general situation of forest resources and the economic benefits they bring, to provide methodological support for government supervision [18]. Forest tourism is a common method employed that involves the paid use of forest resources. Based on natural forest management practices, investigating tourists’ preferences for changes in forest resources can evaluate the recreational value of paid use of forest resources [19]. Under the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, the economic benefits generated by forest carbon sequestration are an indispensable part of paid use [20].
Bibliometric analysis is a new method of evaluating research plans. It analyzes scientific research activities through indicators representing output [21,22] and records human knowledge research in the form of quantitative documents [23,24]. Papers are not only an important carrier of scientific research results but also an important clue providing insight into the development of scientific knowledge [25,26,27]. Most of the existing review studies are mainly qualitative. For this study, 451 journal documents involving the paid use of state-owned forest resources in the CNKI database of China from 2008 to 2021 were used as samples. This study combines qualitative reviews with quantitative analysis. Firstly, the basic feature of the general statistics, authors, funding, and other contents were analyzed. Secondly, software was used to analyze cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling (MDS), co-occurrence network analysis, and developing trend analysis. The following software was used: BICOMB (2.02, CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, Beijing, China), SPSS (23.0, International Business Machines Corporation, New York, NY, USA), UCINET (6.0, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA), and CiteSpace (5.8.R3, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) [28,29,30,31]. Thirdly, content analysis was carried out based on documents. The workflow is summarized in Figure 1. This visualizes the scientific knowledge map of the research on the paid use of state-owned forest resources and the changes in the time dimension of related research. Categorizing the research status of the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China could promote the sustainable and efficient use of state-owned forest resources, and guarantee national forest resource ownership. It is important to implement a process of sustainable development.

2. Data Sources and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

The sample data of this study come from the CNKI database. The 17th National Congress of China, which “comprehensively promoted the reform of forest rights”, was taken as the time node. The retrieval time was limited from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2021. When searching for papers, papers were limited to topics that included “paid use of state-owned forest resources”, “state-owned forest capitalization”, and “forest health and state-owned forests”. A total of 612 papers were retrieved. Considering the problems of parameter setting and paper format inconsistency, when extracting data from different types of papers, to ensure the quality of the sample papers, the papers were limited to journal documents in CNKI during document retrieval. The interviews and conference notice documents were excluded. Papers with low relevance and no keywords were also excluded. Finally, 451 sample documents were obtained.

2.2. Methodology

This study adopts a research method combining review and measurement. Firstly, it analyzes the characteristics of the number of papers, the core authors, the finding, the institutions, and the journals. Secondly, the research status and hot spots of the samples were visually analyzed. Thirdly, BICOMB was used to conduct word frequency statistics for high-frequency keywords and to construct a co-occurrence matrix and a dissimilarity matrix [28]. SPSS was used for cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling of the matrix. Fourthly, the UCINET visualization tool NetDraw (2.084, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA) was used to analyze the keyword co-occurrence network [29], and CiteSpace was used to take the time factor into account [30,31]. The internal relationship and frontier prospects of relevant research were explored with the help of keyword timeline visualization and detection of burst words. Finally, according to the statistical results, combined with the actual connotation of the subject words, the sample papers are classified and summarized. The specific data processing is shown in Figure 2. Moreover, typical papers from the search results were selected for in-depth reading, and statistical mining was used to compensate for the lack of sample documents. The research on the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China was thus improved.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Feature Analysis

3.1.1. General Statistics

The number of statistical documents is an important index for measuring research progress, hot spots, and prospects. Through the extraction of 451 documents, it was concluded that the number of published documents has increased year by year from 2008 to 2017, peaking in 2107, beginning to decline in 2018 and 2019, and then beginning to rise steadily, as shown in Figure 3. However, there are only 61 SCI/CSSCI/core journals, which account for only 13.53% of the total, indicating that there are few high-quality studies in this field. The reasons for this situation may be that, since the paid use was put forward, the system and supervision mechanisms are not comprehensive. Specifically, by the end of 2021, there were 4297 state-owned forest farms and 87 forest industry enterprises in key state-owned forest areas in China, so it is difficult to investigate the statistics, and it is difficult to obtain micro-data. The evaluation of the reform effect also suffers from a time lag.

3.1.2. Authors

Scholars are the core force that promotes the development of scientific research, and the number of papers published by scholars is the main criterion of their research ability. The author’s contribution to a research field can be intuitively shown by the statistics of their publications [32].
BICOMB was used to set the author as the keyword and extracted it. Based on the statistics of 451 sample documents, 816 actual authors were obtained after excluding non-real authors (such as a research group and an editorial department) and combining the authors who published multiple articles. The average number of published articles was 0.56. The core author is defined by Price’s law, which is the calculation formula of the minimum number of publications of the core author [33]:
n = 0.749 × m a x m
m a x ( m ) represents the publications of the most prolific author in this research field. According to the calculation, n 1.98, which means that authors with more than two papers published are high-yield authors. Thus, 55 core authors were screened, accounting for 29.27%, and 70.73% published only one paper, as shown in Table 1. Taking “author” as a node, the graph was obtained by setting the measurement parameters, as shown in Figure 4, to more clearly observe the research teams. The authors of some research teams are shown in Figure 4.

3.1.3. Funding

Supported by fund projects, papers produced under relatively complete conditions have a higher academic quality and greater influence [34]. According to the statistics of the sample documents, there are 140 papers on fund projects, and 61 of them are provincially funded projects, accounting for the highest proportion. After that, 33 of them are funded at the ministerial level, accounting for 23.57%. Sixteen of them are nationally funded projects, accounting for 11.43%, and the rest are funded at the university level, city level, or department level, as shown in Table 2.

3.1.4. Institutions

An analysis of the author’s institution helps to judge the scientific research strength of the institution. It is also beneficial to understand the distribution of the core group density of research institutions and master the general situation and talent flow at the macro level.
BICOMB was used to make statistics on the author’s units. Considering that the names of different departments and units in the same unit may change in different years, the second-level institutions were merged into first-level institutions, and 324 institutions were categorized, with an average publication volume of 1.39. According to Price’s law, n = 3.745 was obtained [33]; institutions with a publication volume of ≥4 can be identified as high-yielding institutions. There was a total of 10 high-yielding institutions, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 5.

3.1.5. Journals

Academic journals are the concentration of documents, and there is a certain correlation between the quality of documents and the grade of the journals included. Further statistical analysis could improve the research status of the relevant documents. According to the statistics, the sample documents are distributed in 182 journals with an average of 2.48 articles. According to Bradford’s Law [35],
Core   zone : Correlation   zone : Zero   correlation   zone = 1 : N : N 2
In this law, N is the number of articles. According to the calculation, the publication density of journals in the core zone is 13.64, which is much higher than that of the correlation zone and zero correlation zone. A total of 150 journals have been published in the core zone, accounting for 33.26%, indicating that there have been relatively stable journals in this field, as shown in Table 4. The top three journals are Forestry Economy, Green Science and Technology, and China Forestry Economy.

3.2. Bibliometric Analysis

3.2.1. Keywords and Co-Occurrence Matrix

Keywords refer to the extraction of professional terms or words representing the subject content of the paper, to reflect the research content and methods of the paper. High-frequency keywords represent highly concentrated research. A visual analysis of high-frequency keywords is helpful to quickly show the general situation of the research field and determine the research path.
The keywords of the sample documents were counted, and 989 keywords were initially extracted. Donohue’s high and low-frequency word demarcation formula [36] is as follows:
T = 1 + 1 + 8 I 1 2
In the above formula, I 1 is the number of keywords with a frequency of one. The threshold value of high-frequency words was T  39.08; however, the only keywords with a word frequency greater than 40 are “state-owned forest farms”, the “under-forestry economy”, “forest experience”, “forest health”, and “forest tourism.” The paid use of state-owned forest resources is an emerging research topic, the research scope is relatively scattered, and there are many words with a frequency of one. To study this intuitively and comprehensively, after eliminating the high-frequency keywords that are not conducive to this research, the keywords with a word frequency greater than or equal to five were selected for analysis, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5 shows that the research content in the field is very rich, not only involving forest tourism, forest health, forest experience, and under-forestry economy, but also forest carbon sequestration, ecological product value, and forest park. To meet the data requirements of the following co-occurrence network analysis of the sample documents, BICOMB was further used to carry out pairwise statistics on the above high-frequency keywords, forming a co-occurrence matrix of 42 × 42, as shown in Table 6. To eliminate the influence of the large difference in the co-occurrence frequency on the cluster analysis, the Ochiai coefficient was used to modify the co-occurrence matrix [37], and it was converted into a correlation matrix. The specific conversion formula is
Ochiai = n A B / n A × n B
In the above formula, n A B represents the frequency of any co-occurrence of A and B, n A represents the frequency of word A, and n B represents the frequency of word B. To avoid the error caused by more “zero” values in the co-occurrence matrix, it was further transformed into a 42 × 42 dissimilarity matrix, as shown in Table 7. The smaller the value, the greater the correlation between keywords.

3.2.2. Cluster Analysis and MDS

Cluster analysis is a statistical analysis method that classifies samples according to their characteristics, to intuitively reflect the relationship between samples [38]. Algorithms were as follows: The high-frequency keyword matrix was imported into SPSS. This study chose “analyze”, “classify”, and “hierarchical cluster analysis”. Hierarchical cluster analysis is a method to determine the distance between new classes and other classes when distance is used as similarity statistics. Then, this study selected “proximity matrix” in the statistics interface, and chose “dendrogram”. The sample documents were processed by the between-groups linkage method and squared Euclidean distance. The high-frequency keyword cluster analysis graph is shown in Figure 6, and the case processing summary is shown in Table 8. The high-frequency keywords of numbers 1–42 are shown in Table 5.
To further visualize the clustering results of high-frequency keywords, MDS was used to display the distribution of keywords in this field in a two-dimensional space. MDS is a multivariate statistical method that simplifies high-dimensional spatial data into low-dimensional spatial data through nonlinear transformation and then locates, analyzes, and classifies the data [39]. Similar objects were relatively clustered, and the Euclidean distance model was used to analyze the dissimilarity matrix to obtain a two-dimensional knowledge graph, as shown in Figure 7. The high-frequency keywords of numbers 1–42 are shown in Table 5. It can be seen that high-frequency keywords are clustered in regions, forming three relatively concentrated keyword topics, which are consistent with the results of cluster analysis.
According to Figure 6 and Figure 7, combined with the actual connotation of each high-frequency keyword, the sample documents divide into three topics. The first is research on the development status of paid use, including “forest resources”, “paid use”, “state-owned forest area”, “forest assets”, and “ecological product value”. The second is research on forest tourism and forest health, including “forest tourism”, “suggestion”, “planning and designing”, the “experience economy”, “state-owned forest resources”, “problem”, “forest culture”, “experience”, and “national forest park”. The third is research on the development of the under-forestry economy (under-forestry planting, breeding, and product processing), including the “under-forestry economy”, “understory economic development”, “development status”, “community structure”, and the “development strategy”. From the perspective of the internal and external relationship of high-frequency keywords, the relationships between the internal high-frequency keywords of each hot spot are relatively close, and the clustering results are relatively ideal.

3.2.3. Co-Occurrence Network Analysis

A co-occurrence network refers to an analysis method that interprets the network properties of different objects by analyzing the connections between them [40]. Combined with a knowledge graph, the target object is presented in the form of an image with the help of the position and size of the node and the connection and distance between the nodes. Using UCINET, the co-occurrence matrix of high-frequency keywords constructed above was imported, and NetDraw was used to draw the co-occurrence network graph of high-frequency keywords, as shown in Figure 8.
Each node in the figure represents a high-frequency keyword, and the position of the node shows the position of the word in the network. The closer it is to the center, the higher its importance. The larger the node, the greater its role. The connection between the nodes represents the key. The more connection there is between the nodes, the stronger the relationship between words is. Figure 8 shows that the current research on the paid use of state-owned forest resources mainly focuses on “state-owned forest farms”, “paid use”, “under-forestry economy”, “forest tourism”, “ecological product value”, “forest health”, and other aspects. These keywords are located at the core of the network map, and there are relatively dense connections that attract a high amount of attention. “Forest experience education”, “experience economy”, “community structure”, and “forest culture” are on the edge, with sparse connections and a low amount of attention. There are few studies on the combination of paid use.

3.2.4. Developing Trend Analysis

Combined with the above analysis of the number of papers, institutions, funding, and high-frequency keywords, this study provides a general grasp of the research status of the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China. On this basis, the time dimension was included in the influencing factors of the study, and CiteSpace was used to conduct a longitudinal dynamic analysis of the sample documents, to obtain a timeline map, as shown in Figure 9. Different from cluster analysis, the timeline map shows not only the regularity of the study over time, but also the relationship between different clusters. In addition, as supplementary proof, the sample documents were detected by burst word, which refers to the practice of mining words with high-frequency in a short period. Taking “keyword” as a node, the graph was obtained by setting the measurement parameters, as shown in Figure 10, to more clearly observe the evolution of the related research over time.
According to the timeline visualization and the detection results of the burst words, the intermediary centralities of “state-owned forest farms” and the “under-forestry economy” are the highest, followed by “forest tourism” and “forest experience”, etc. In the research from 2008 to 2010, scholars paid more attention to “state-owned forest farms”, the “under-forestry economy”, “forest park”, and “forest tourism.” With time, the research on “forest experience”, “forest health tourism”, and “forest carbon sequestration”, one after the other, increased. According to the detection of burst words, the explosion point of the “experience economy” was from 2008 to 2013, and this research lasted the longest. Most of the research on “forest assets” and “asset evaluation” focuses on the period from 2009 to 2013. Over time, the research topics in this field have gradually become enriched, including “ecotourism”, “forest experience”, “forest health”, and “forest carbon sequestration”.

3.3. Content Theme Analysis

Combined with the above statistical analysis results and literature review, this paper focuses on three topics, as shown in Table 9.
(1) Research on the development status of paid use. Research on this topic focuses on policy analysis and theoretical analysis, with a few empirical studies supported by micro-data, and mainly focuses on the system and supervision of paid use. In terms of research methods, scholars have used institutional economics analysis methods to determine institutional changes and conduct macroscopic qualitative discussions.
According to the document issued by Fujian Province, the paid use of state-owned forest resources involves a state-owned forest resource asset management unit through a paid use contract or agreement, for a certain range of forest resource assets, and allows for the use of units or individuals by paid users. China issued the document in 2017, which proposed the establishment system for the paid use of state-owned natural resources, but the progress of such use is relatively slow [4]. It is necessary to determine the scope, period, conditions, procedures, and methods of this paid use and achieve an adequate top-level design of its system supply [41]. Forest resources related to the paid use of mineral, water, and sea areas, which is relatively backward in terms of natural resources, China has not formed such use in the legal sense. This means that the subject of the property rights is ignored and their value is not fully reflected, among other issues [42].
From the perspective of legislation, there are very few legal norms directly related to the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China, and they lack systematization. From the perspective of system analysis, the subject, object, mode, and price are worth studying [43]. First of all, the ownership exercise mechanism is not independent and unified, leading to the replacement of state-owned forest resource property rights by administrative management, and the control and usufruct are obtained by local governments. Secondly, it is difficult for economic subjects outside state-owned forest farms to participate, and the fair competition rights of potential resource holders are damaged. Accordingly, the establishment of a system for the paid use of state-owned forest resources is imminent [44].
In addition, the supervision mechanisms have not been clarified. Defining dynamic and effective supervision over the process is important to ensure the value preservation and appreciation of state-owned forest resources [45]. The management reform system of state-owned forests in Germany adopts a model of separation of government and enterprise. The forestry administrative agencies do not directly operate state-owned forests and accept the supervision of functional agencies, so the operation, management, and supervision of state-owned forests are separate from each other. However, China’s state-owned forest resources adopt a model of government and enterprise integration. The relationship between the government and the market is still not clear. Specifically, asset management and government supervision are confused. Government property rights supervision and management responsibilities are unclear, and supervision and management before, during, and after the fact is often not in place [46].
In conclusion, the research result shows that a paid use system and a supervision system reflecting the market situation and the value of resources have not been established in China. This study suggests that China should clearly define the property rights structure, set up a government supervision agency for forest resources in state-owned forest farms, clearly supervise law enforcement powers, and perfect the supervision mechanism of paid use price evaluations.
(2) Research on forest tourism and forest health. This kind of research is based on both the empirical research of econometrics and the case analysis of resource endowment differences in different regions. The research contents of forest tourism and forest health are shown in Table 10.
Forest tourism is the direct or indirect use of forest landscape resources and takes tourism as the main purpose of various forms of wild travel activities. These activities benefit operators, tourists, and community residents and achieve the sustainable and harmonious development of the environment, society, and economy [47]. Since the 1980s, forest tourism has played the role of invigorating forests and enriching people’s lives. Various provinces regard forest tourism as a focus for increasing the income of the tertiary industry, and scholars discuss the development direction of forest tourism in different regions [48,49]. Some scholars have used a comprehensive index method to measure the development level of forest tourism in the ecological environment by constructing a forest tourism evaluation index system [50]. In addition, some scholars have studied the relationship between forest tourism and the ecological environment and have studied the interest coordination mechanism of forest eco-tourism through dynamic game analysis and a coupling degree model [51]. The development of forest tourism should be based on the premise of ecological security and environmental protection to achieve sustainable development more scientifically.
Originating in Germany, forest health refers to all activities that are beneficial to human physical and mental health based on forest ecological products and experienced through the “five senses” of human vision, hearing, smell, taste, and touch. For example, visiting the cultural landscape in the natural environment, carrying out natural science education, and work experience [52]. Scholars have used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), SWOT analysis, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and the Carnot model to indicate the necessity of forest health [53]. Government departments should formulate a development plan for the forest recreation industry, carry out pilot demonstrations, issue supportive policies, convert resources into practical benefits, and promote the transformation of forest parks in the direction of recreation [54,55,56].
(3) Research on the under-forestry economy (under-forestry planting, breeding, and product processing). Research on the under-forestry economy mainly focuses on its development status (development efficiency, development mode, and development countermeasures), benefits, and influence on farmers. According to the Group Standard of the Chinese Forestry Society (T/CSF001-2018), the under-forestry economy refers to an eco-friendly economy based on forests, woodlands, and their ecological environment, following the principle of sustainable management. It includes under-forestry planting, the under-forestry breeding, collection, and processing of various products, and the utilization of forest landscapes.
The research on the development status of the under-forestry economy consists of research on development efficiency, development mode, and countermeasures. In studies of development efficiency, scholars mostly select economic development data, the list index system, and the calculation method through the DEA statistical analysis model and analyze the development efficiency. Usually, the efficiency of farmers’ under-forestry planting and operation is taken as a dependent variable to investigate the influence of input factors, property rights factors, policy factors, and farmer characteristics on efficiency, and to further clarify property rights, promote the development of the under-forestry economy, and promote the rational allocation of input factors [57,58,59].
In addition, some scholars have used the inductive case analysis method to compare the efficiency performance and found that there is a phenomenon of resource mismatch [60]. Development mode and countermeasure research can be divided into two groups. One discusses development modes of forest planting, breeding, and different ecological tourism [61]. Researchers use a GM (1, 1) grey model to forecast the development of the economy, trade, and industry or expound from the viewpoint of the mechanism [62,63]. The other analyzes the benefit of models according to the natural environment and the economic level of the local area and determines suitable development countermeasures [64,65].
There are three kinds of studies on the economic benefits of under-forestry. The first kind adopts an AHP and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, which constructs an evaluation system model of the comprehensive benefit [66]. After that, different forestry economic models are evaluated in terms of comprehensive benefit, and the best model is determined [67]. The second measures the economic benefits of poultry, bacteria, vegetables, medicines, and other features of the forest and puts forward development modes suitable for local areas as well as suggestions for maximizing the economic benefits [68]. The third analyzes the factors affecting economic benefits, such as the age of the forest, government financial investments, the guaranteed operating area of water and electricity, and the educational level of the operating subjects. The main problems of the under-forestry economy are the low educational level of the operating subjects, a relatively single organizational form, and a shortage of funds [69].
Studies on the under-forestry economy and the influence of farmers could be divided into two categories. One uses microscopic data and either a Logistic model or a structural equation model to study the influencing factors and paths of farmers’ willingness to participate in the under-forestry economy. These studies consider education level, forestland area, family capital adequacy, benefit expectations, the age structure of farmers, and the proportion of non-agricultural income [70,71]. The other category consists of studies that combine the forest economy and farmers’ livelihood in case analyses, address the poor utilization of resources, and management difficulties. In addition to strengthening the development of science and technology, and a technical approach to sustainable utilization, farmers require sustainable management of the gathering process, standardized understory product management and processing enterprises, and useful services for industrial development [72,73].

4. Discussion

This study summarizes the relevant topics by reviewing the research status of the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China. In addition, this study analyzes the above results from three dimensions: basic feature, bibliometric, and time trend changes.
Firstly, the results from the perspective of the basic feature are analyzed. From the number of papers shown in Figure 3, Throughout the literature review in this field, its quantity generally shows conservative growth. The number of published documents peaked in 2107. This was closely related to the frequent promulgation of policies in 2017. In January 2017, China proposed to establish state-owned natural resource asset management and a natural ecological supervision institution to uniformly exercise the responsibilities of the owner of natural resource assets owned by the people. In October 2017, the State Council of China issued documents to guide the reform of the paid use system of national owned natural resource assets and pointed out that it was necessary to promote laws and regulations governing the paid use of national owned natural resource assets such as land, water, forest, and grassland, to establish a paid use system [4]. The research in 2017 mainly focused on institutional and regulatory systems. Due to the lack of micro-data for paid use pilots, the number of papers decreased in 2018 and 2019. In 2020, the National Forestry and Grass Administration of China pointed out the suggestions for accelerating paid use of forest resources in state-owned forest areas. It had further promoted the steady rise of research results in relevant fields [74]. It is difficult to quantify the driving force of policy; therefore, qualitative analysis is carried out in combination with the actual situation, and this is the limitation of this study.
From the statistical table of authors shown in Table 1 and Figure 4, the above statistical results show that although core groups of authors with a certain influence have been formed, the core authors account for 29.27%, and the research impact is still scattered and weak. There is a lack of in-depth and sustainable research, which may be related to the fact that paid use is still in the promotion stage and lacks relevant systems and an operational supervision mechanism. From the statistical table of fund projects shown in Table 2, the state, ministries, commissions, provinces, and universities have attached great importance and provided support to the paid use of state-owned forest resources, and the quality of papers has gradually improved. However, some studies have shown that the marginal efficiency of scientific research projects is decreasing [75]. It is necessary to conduct an in-depth review of research results in various fields. From Table 3 and Figure 5, It can be concluded that universities are the main battlefield of this research field. Social departments such as government functional institutions and professional associations are less engaged, indicating that academic research and actual management work in this field are misaligned and disjointed.
Secondly, the results from the perspective of bibliometrics are analyzed. As can be seen from the high-frequency keywords shown in Table 5, research on the paid use of state-owned forest resources is very rich, including listing paid use ways such as forest tourism, and the exploration of paid use modes and system management. According to Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, combined with the actual connotation of each high-frequency keyword, the sample documents divide into three topics. One is research on the development status of paid use. The paid use is based on the utility value theory. Although forest resources are not commodities, they have been used by consumers and can provide a measure of economic benefits to the global ecosystem on this basis [9]. A paid use system and a supervision system reflecting the market situation and the value of resources have not been established in China. One is research on forest tourism and forest health. Under effective management, there are multiple stakeholders in the management of paid forest use. Multi-stakeholder benefits should be the goal to achieve sustainable forest development. This is consistent with the research conclusion of Pelyukh et al. and Yao et al. [16,47]. Another is research on the under-forestry economy. Using AHP, DEA, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method constructs an evaluation system model of the comprehensive benefits of the under-forestry economy [66].
Thirdly, the results from the perspective of time trend changes are analyzed. The research on the paid use of state-owned forest resources is based on the reform practices of state-owned forest farms and state-owned forest areas. The relevant theoretical research and policy formulations are derived from the solutions to practical problems. According to Figure 9 and Figure 10, in the research from 2008 to 2010, scholars paid more attention to “state-owned forest farms”, “under-forestry economy”, “forest park”, and “forest tourism”. The explosion point of the “experience economy” was from 2008 to 2013. This means that this field received continuous attention. Forest experience, forest tourism, and forest health are different development methods based on the experience economy. Most of the research on “forest assets” and “asset evaluation” focused on the period from 2009 to 2013. The research topics in this field have gradually become enriched, including “ecotourism”, “forest experience”, “forest health”, and “forest carbon sequestration” from 2016 till now. According to the asset management theory, forest resources are a kind of resource asset. The paid use of forest resources requires bringing them into a state-owned asset management system and managing property rights by scientific principles and economic laws. Considering forest resources as assets, clarifying property rights, and forming a pricing mechanism can truly reflect the ownership of forest resources by the state and the people economically, and ensure the preservation and appreciation of state-owned forest resource assets. The economic benefits generated by forest carbon sequestration are an indispensable part of paid use. Forest ecosystems can achieve the effect of carbon sequestration while reserving energy [20]. Given the continuity of burst words, the research on paid use and “forest carbon sequestration” are still technical branches worthy of attention in the future.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

5.1. Conclusions

In this study, 451 documents on the paid use of state-owned forest resources in the CNKI database from 2008 to 2021 were selected as samples, and statistical analysis software, such as BICOMB, SPSS, UCINET, and CiteSpace, was used to analyze the experiment. This study first identified the general statistics, the authors, the funding, the institutions, and the journals and then constructed a co-occurrence matrix and a dissimilarity matrix of high-frequency keywords. In addition, cluster analysis, MDS, and co-occurrence network analysis were carried out. In addition, time was also taken into account. A timeline visualization map was combined with the detection of burst words, and the following conclusions were drawn:
(1) In terms of the basic feature analysis, this study finds that the number of papers is rising, and high-yield authors account for 29.27% of the total documents. Core author groups with a certain influence have been formed, but the research force is relatively scattered. In addition, the support of provincially funded projects accounts for the highest proportion, reaching 43.57%. Northeast Forestry University and Beijing Forestry University pay more attention to this field, and the distribution density of journals in the core zone is 13.64. Moreover, there is a relatively stable number of journals in this research field.
(2) According to the results of keyword cluster analysis and MDS, the research can be divided into three topics: The development status of paid use, forest tourism and forest health, and the under-forestry economy (under-forestry planting, breeding, and product processing). At present, state-owned forest resources in China have not established a paid-use system or a supervision mechanism reflecting market supply and demand and resource value. Therefore, the property rights structure of state-owned forest resources needs to be clearly defined. A scientifically based paid-use system and ex-post supervision mechanism should be established, to promote reform. The government should actively develop forest tourism and forest health projects that meet the needs of different consumers and promote the transformation of resources into benefits. Furthermore, according to the differences in resource endowments in different regions, targeted strategies should be implemented to improve the efficiency of understory economic development and the comprehensive benefits to the economy, society, and ecology.
(3) According to the analysis results of the co-occurrence network, keywords such as “state-owned forest farms”, the “under-forestry economy”, “forest tourism”, “ecological product value”, and “forest health” are in the core position, and they are considered important in this field. According to the timeline visualization map and the detection of burst words, the intermediary centralities of “state-owned forest farms” and the “under-forestry economy” are the highest, followed by “forest tourism” and “forest experience”, etc. With time and the promulgation of policies, the research focus in this field has gradually shifted from “forest assets” and “forestry economics” to “ecotourism” and “forest health”. The research on the development status of paid use and “forest carbon sequestration” is a technical branch worthy of attention.

5.2. Outlook

With the increasing attention of academia to the reform of the paid use of state-owned forest resources, relevant research is also gradually increasing. The research not only enriches the existing theoretical basis, but also promotes the development of practice. Some results have been found, but there is still much room for future research.
In terms of research methods, the research on the development status of the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China mainly focuses on the review of relevant literature, the theoretical analysis of the system and regulatory mechanism, and the empirical analysis of single approaches to paid use. There is a lack of micro-level empirical research on the paid use of forest resources in state-owned forest areas and state-owned forest farms. It is necessary to combine theory with practice to promote the reform of state-owned forest resources.
Research contents can be divided into the following five points. Firstly, the research of state-owned forest resources is not limited to forest tourism, forest health, and the under-forestry economy. Moreover, whether the value conversion of ecological products, carbon sink trading, and ecological security can be achieved through quantification is worth discussing in future research. Secondly, the lack of an efficiency evaluation system for the paid use of state-owned forest resources makes it impossible to compare and evaluate its reform effect, so it is difficult to produce a more efficient model. The construction of an efficient evaluation system should have more attention paid to it in the future. Thirdly, an evaluation system of state-owned forest resources assets needs to be established, and a fair evaluation of the paid use of forest resources is required. How a pricing model of forest resource assets can be constructed to fairly evaluate the right to use forest land is a practical problem that needs to be solved. Fourthly, property rights about state-owned forest resources are not clearly defined. There are multiple leaders in the management system, and the hierarchy of power and responsibility is not clear. The departments in charge of state-owned forests are burdened with administrative functions. Simultaneously, they are responsible for ownership management and supervision. Furthermore, how ownership and use rights can be separated is worthy of investigation. Finally, the state-owned forest resource market is not mature, and a developed market system has not been fully formed. Thus, the role of the market and policies in promoting the development of the paid use of forest resources, as well as how the economic, social, and ecological benefits of the state-owned forest resource management in both government and the market can be maximized, will remain areas of research focus for a considerable amount of time. In conclusion, research on the paid use of state-owned forest resources in China is an important research field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W.; methodology, X.W.; software, X.W.; validation, X.W.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, X.W. and C.L.; resources, X.W.; data curation, X.W. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; writing—review and editing, X.W.; visualization, X.W.; supervision, W.C.; funding acquisition, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the China-UK LTS Beijing representative offices. Research on the Impact of China’s National Reserve Forest Project from the Perspective of the Global Timber Supply Chain and Forest Governance (grant number L19-15 03/2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and comments of reviewers and editors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations Strategic Plan for Forests, 2017–2030. 2017. Available online: https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/UNSPF_AdvUnedited.pdf (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations Forest Instrument. 2016. Available online: https://www.un.org/esa/forests/documents/un-forest-instrument/index.html (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 11 March 2022).
  4. State Council of China. Guiding Opinions on the Reform of the System of Paid Use of Natural Resource Assets Owned by the Whole People. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-01/16/content_5160287.htm (accessed on 3 March 2022).
  5. Ceccherini, G.; Duveiller, G.; Grassi, G.; Lemoine, G.; Avitabile, V.; Pilli, R.; Cescatti, A. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 2020, 583, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020—Key Findings. 2020. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca8753en (accessed on 20 March 2022). [CrossRef]
  7. National Forestry and Grassland Administration. China Forest Resources Report (2014–2018); China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. The Suggestions on Formulating the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Term Goals for 2035. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm?trs=1 (accessed on 11 March 2022).
  9. Costanza, R.; D’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Diaz-Balteiro, L.; Alonso, R.; Martínez-Jaúregui, M.; Pardos, M. Selecting the best forest management alternative by aggregating ecosystem services indicators over time: A case study in central Spain. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 72, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karlsson, M.; Wolf, A. Using an optimization model to evaluate the economic benefits of industrial symbiosis in the forest industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1536–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons: The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science 1968, 162, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lambini, C.K.; Nguyen, T.T. A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions: Evidence from Ghana and Vietnam. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 38, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, S.; Xu, J. Livelihood mushroomed: Examining household level impacts of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) under new management regime in China’s state forests. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 98, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, C.; Fang, Y.; Chen, X.; Congshan, T. Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Global Sustainable Livelihood Research. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pelyukh, O.; Lavnyy, V.; Paletto, A.; Troxler, D. Stakeholder analysis in sustainable forest management: An application in the Yavoriv region (Ukraine). For. Policy Econ. 2021, 131, 102561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Laakkonen, A.; Hujala, T.; Pykäläinen, J. Integrating intangible resources enables creating new types of forest services-developing forest leasing value network in Finland. For. Policy Econ. 2019, 99, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Song, M.; Zhu, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. China’s natural resources balance sheet from the perspective of government oversight: Based on the analysis of governance and accounting attributes. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 248, 109232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nielsen, A.B.; Olsen, S.B.; Lundhede, T. An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 80, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koponen, K.; Soimakallio, S.; Kline, K.; Cowie, A.; Brandão, M. Quantifying the climate effects of bioenergy–choice of reference system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2271–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Benedictus, R.; Miedema, F.; Ferguson, M.W.J. Fewer numbers, better science. Nature 2016, 538, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Demyanyk, Y.; Hasan, I. Financial Crises and Bank Failures: A Review of Prediction Methods. Omega 2010, 38, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zambrano Farias, F.; Valls Martínez, M.C.; Martín-Cervantes, P.A. Explanatory Factors of Business Failure: Literature Review and Global Trends. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wei, J.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, L.; Yang, R.; Wang, M. Exploring development and evolutionary trends in carbon offset research: A bibliometric perspective. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 18850–18869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pankowska, M. Information Technology Outsourcing Chain: Literature Review and Implications for Development of Distributed Coordination. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, X.; Xu, Z.; Su, S.-F.; Zhou, W. A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of uncertain group decision making from 1980 to 2019. Inf. Sci. 2021, 547, 328–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bouzembrak, Y.; Klüche, M.; Gavai, A.; Marvin, H.J. Internet of Things in food safety: Literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 94, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cui, L.; Liu, W.; Yan, L.; Zhang, H.; Hou, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, H. Development of Bibliographic Information Co-occurrence Mining System in Document Database. Mod. Libr. Inf. Technol. 2008, 24, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, J. Whole Network Analysis: A Practical Guide to UCINET Software, 2nd ed.; People’s Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 2014; pp. 144–184. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2006, 57, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, J.; Chen, C.M. CiteSpace: Science and Technology Text Mining and Visualization; Capital University of Economics and Business Press: Beijing, China, 2017; pp. 112–113. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yin, Z.J.; Liu, M.; Zhang, L.S. Analysis of Knowledge Graph and Hot Topics in Domestic Green Space Planning Research—Based on the Perspective of Bibliometrics Co-word Analysis. Mod. Urban Res. 2020, 10, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Solla Price, D.J. Little Science, Big Science; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1963; pp. 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  34. Luo, M.; Zhu, X.Z. Research on the composition of low-carbon policies in my country based on co-word analysis. J. Manag. 2014, 11, 1680–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bradford, S.C. Classic Paper: Sources of Information on Specific Subjects. Collect. Manag. 1976, 1, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Donohue, J.C. Understanding Scientific Literatures: A Bibliometric Approach; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1973; pp. 49–50. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mishra, S.; Torvik, V.I. Quantifying Conceptual Novelty in the Biomedical Literature. Digit. Libr. Mag. 2016, 22, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, H. Application of Cluster Analysis Based on SPSS in Industry Statistical Data. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Guo, H.Y.; Chen, J.Q. Analysis of the current situation of data mining research in my country—Based on the perspective of co-word analysis. Inf. Sci. 2011, 10, 1589–1593. [Google Scholar]
  40. Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1978, 1, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, W.M. Improving the Value Realization Mechanism of Ecological Products—Based on the Investigation of Fujian Forest Ecological Bank. Macroecon. Manag. 2020, 3, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, Z.; Qiao, J.L. Research on the system of the paid use of forest resources in state-owned forest farms: Taking Shandong and Fujian as an example. China For. Econ. 2020, 2, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuang, Y. Research on the System of the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources in My Country. Master’s Thesis, Anhui University, Hefei, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dong, J.Y. Research on the Legal System of the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources. Master’s Thesis, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qi, Y.; Ma, N.; Chen, J.C. Research on the mechanism of the paid use of forest resources in state-owned forest farms. For. Econ. 2018, 40, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, J.C.; Hu, M.X.; Chen, W.H.; Wu, L.P.; Wu, T.X.; Yi, A.J.; Qian, Y.R.; Li, J.F.; Hao, M.; Du, S.H.; et al. Research on the Management of State-Owned Forests in the World; China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 214–215. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yao, X.Q.; Ding, W.E.; Lin, H.; He, P.K. An Overview of China’s Forest Tourism Development. For. Surv. Plan. 2007, 32, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Q.H. Discussion on the development direction of forest parks and forest tourism in Sanming City. For. Econ. 2018, 40, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Z.W.; Peng, L.M. Discussion on the development of forest health tourism relying on the national forest park—Taking Zhejiang Yandang Mountain National Forest Park as an example. For. Prod. Ind. 2017, 44, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zheng, M.S.; Zhang, J. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of my country’s forest tourism ecological environment development level. For. Econ. 2020, 42, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cao, W.; Li, D.Q.; Qin, T.T. The benefit coordination mechanism of forest ecotourism development. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2014, 24, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shu, Y.; Lou, Y.; Zhang, H.L.; Wang, H. Analysis on the current situation and path of the development of my country’s forest health care industry: Based on the study of typical regions. World For. Res. 2019, 32, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, L.J.; Tian, Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Lv, J.H. Research on Consumer Demand Types of Forest Health Care Base Services—Based on Kano Model and Analysis of Customer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction Coefficients. For. Econ. 2021, 43, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, T.; He, M.T. The development of forest health care industry is an inevitable result of implementing supply-side structural reforms. For. Econ. 2017, 39, 39–42+86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bu, C.L. Discussion on the necessity of the development of domestic forest health care industry and its specific path. For. Sci. Technol. Inf. 2021, 53, 84–85. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, J.R.; Xu, D. Research on the construction of the evaluation index system of forest health tourism. For. Econ. 2018, 40, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peng, B.; Liu, J.C. Research on Economic Development Efficiency of Guangxi Linxia Based on DEA Model. J. Guangxi Univ. Natl. 2014, 36, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu, G.C.; Guo, S.Y.; Cao, Y.K. Evaluation of the development efficiency of China’s underforest economy and industry—Based on the panel data of 31 provinces (regions). J. Northeast. For. Univ. 2020, 48, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, P.O.; Jiang, X.M.; He, C.; Wen, Y. Comparative Research on Labor Input-Output Efficiency of Woodland Management Model—Taking Liaoning Province as an Example. For. Econ. Issues 2016, 36, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, R.H.; Ke, S.F.; Zhu, L.F. Analysis of the output efficiency of the under-forest economy from the perspective of resource misallocation—a case comparison based on forest pig breeding in state-owned forest areas. For. Econ. Issues 2018, 38, 28–35+103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, S.C. Research on economic development models and suggestions under the new situation under forest. Jiangxi Agric. 2018, 22, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, H.; Zhu, L.Y.; Wang, H.L.; Guo, X.; Zhang, F.; Sun, C. Reflections on the connotation and development model of under-forest economy in the new era. For. Econ. 2019, 41, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, J.X. Economic development mode and effective countermeasures of state-owned forest farms under forest. Rural. Sci. Technol. 2021, 12, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ma, C.J. The economic development model and suggestions under the forest in Liaoning Province. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2019, 23, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sun, J.F. Research on the economic development model under forest in Zhongmu County. Rural. Sci. Technol. 2018, 18, 26–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Du, Y.; Zhao, H.M.; Li, C.; Chen, J.; Xue, Y. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and application of economic benefits under forest. For. Resour. Manag. 2016, 6, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guo, J.; Wang, G.B.; Feng, C.N.; Cao, F. Classification of economic models under ginkgo forest and evaluation of comprehensive benefits of models. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2017, 37, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, T.J. Analysis of Economic Benefit of Under forest Development in Langfang City. For. Pract. Technol. 2010, 5, 42–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, P.; Wang, J.R.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, Z.Y.; Dai, S.B.; Diao, J. Investigation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Economic Benefit under Forest. For. Resour. Manag. 2016, 1, 19–23+31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cheng, Y.; Zeng, W.Z.; Hu, Y. Analysis of the influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to participate in the under-forest economy based on the theory of planned behavior. Rural. Econ. 2021, 11, 62–69. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hu, X.J.; Xu, J.Q.; He, D.H.; Zhang, N.R.; Zheng, Y.F. Willingness of farmers to manage under-forest economy in collective forest areas of Zhejiang Province and its influencing factors. J. Zhejiang AF Univ. 2018, 35, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lv, X.; Jin, Y.L.; Wang, Z.H. A case study on the relationship between under forest resources and farmers’ livelihood in mountainous areas. For. Econ. 2007, 8, 74–75+80. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bai, J.; Tan, P.; Chen, W.; Liu, J. Evaluation of Self-Development Ability and Study of Its Obstacle Factors for State—Owned Forest Farms: Applying the SEM–PPM. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. National Forestry and Grassland Administration of China. Suggestions on Accelerating the Paid Use of Forest Resources Assets in State-Owned Forest Areas. Available online: https://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/4861/20201211/165925119603952.html (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  75. Shang, H.P.; Ye, J.; Zhao, P.P. Public finance efficiency in scientific research in my country: Inefficiency and waste—Evidence from the output of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Social Science Foundation of China. Sci. Res. 2012, 30, 1476–1487+1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Workflow chart.
Figure 1. Workflow chart.
Sustainability 14 05516 g001
Figure 2. Data processing chart.
Figure 2. Data processing chart.
Sustainability 14 05516 g002
Figure 3. The number of papers on the paid use of state-owned forest resources in CNKI from 2008 to 2021.
Figure 3. The number of papers on the paid use of state-owned forest resources in CNKI from 2008 to 2021.
Sustainability 14 05516 g003
Figure 4. Analysis of co-author network (part).
Figure 4. Analysis of co-author network (part).
Sustainability 14 05516 g004
Figure 5. Statistical chart of institutions (Top 10).
Figure 5. Statistical chart of institutions (Top 10).
Sustainability 14 05516 g005
Figure 6. Cluster analysis of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Figure 6. Cluster analysis of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Sustainability 14 05516 g006
Figure 7. Multidimensional scaling of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Figure 7. Multidimensional scaling of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Sustainability 14 05516 g007
Figure 8. Co-occurrence network of paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Figure 8. Co-occurrence network of paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Sustainability 14 05516 g008
Figure 9. Timeline visualization of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Figure 9. Timeline visualization of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Sustainability 14 05516 g009
Figure 10. Detection of the burst words on the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Figure 10. Detection of the burst words on the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Sustainability 14 05516 g010
Table 1. Statistical table of authors (part).
Table 1. Statistical table of authors (part).
NumberAuthorFrequencyPercentageCumulative Percentage
1Daling Zou71.5521.552
2Hong Ma61.3302.882
3Yukun Cao51.1093.991
4Hongge Zhu40.8874.878
5Jianyong He40.8875.765
6Xiule Zhang30.6656.430
7Lee30.6657.095
8Xiangyue Liu30.6657.760
9Minyan Zhao30.6658.425
10Delin Su30.6659.091
11Caixian Zhou30.6659.756
12Xinfeng Chen30.66510.421
13Xiping Cheng30.66511.086
14Aijing Yao20.44411.530
15Yongde Zhong20.44411.974
…………………………
Table 2. Statistical table of fund projects.
Table 2. Statistical table of fund projects.
Fund LevelFund TypeNumber of PapersPercentage
National levelNational Social Science Foundation711.43%
National Natural Science Foundation of China8
National Science and Technology Support Plan1
Ministerial levelHumanities (Philosophy) Social Science Foundation
of the Ministry of Education
923.57%
Central University Funding Project11
National Development and Reform Commission Project2
National Forestry and Grassland Administration Project10
National Bureau of Statistics Project1
Provincial levelProvincial (Philosophy) Social Science Foundation3943.57%
Provincial Natural Science Foundation1
Scientific Research Fund of Provincial Education Commission13
Provincial Postdoctoral Funding8
Department levelOffice of Science and Research Fund Project65%
Department Level Soft Science Project1
Municipal levelMunicipal Social Science Project65.72%
Municipal Soft Science Project2
School levelUniversity Funding Project1510.71%
Total 140100%
Table 3. Statistical table of institutions (Top 10).
Table 3. Statistical table of institutions (Top 10).
RankResearch InstitutionsNumber of PapersRankResearch
Institutions
Number of Papers
1Northeast Forestry University256Fujian Agriculture And Forestry University;5
2Beijing Forestry University137China Inner Mongolia Forest Industry4
3National Forestry and Grassland Administration108Chinese Academy of Forestry4
4Central South University of Forestry & Technology79Heilongjiang Academy of Forestry4
5Southwest Forestry University610State-Owned Gaofeng Forest Farm of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region4
Table 4. Statistical table of journal dispersion.
Table 4. Statistical table of journal dispersion.
ClassificationStandard of NumberJournal TypePercentageNumber of PapersPapers Density
Core zoneN ≥ 10116.05%15013.64
Correlation zone3 ≤ N < 103318.13%1424.30
Zero correlation zoneN < 313875.82%1591.15
Total 182100%4512.48
Table 5. High-frequency keywords.
Table 5. High-frequency keywords.
RankKeywordsFrequencyRankKeywordsFrequencyRankKeywordsFrequency
1State-owned forest farms10415Understory economic development1029Forest assets6
2Under-forestry economy9416Problem1030Planning and designing6
3Forest experience6017Development Strategy1031Forest culture6
4Forest tourism5718Paid use932Forest experience education6
5Forest health5319Forest health tourism833Suggestion6
6Forest park3520Development mode834Key state-owned forest area5
7State-owned forest area2621Forest carbon sequestration835Forestry economics5
8Forest resources1622State-owned forest resources736Management5
9Reform of state-owned forest farms1623Development737Educational tourism of forest5
10Countermeasure1524Experience economy738Ecotourism5
11Ecological product value1425Industrial development739Mode5
12National forest park1426National Forestry and Grassland Bureau740Forest convalescence5
13Development status1327Understory economic industry741Experience5
14Travel experience1028Status742Community structure5
Table 6. Co-occurrence matrix of high-frequency keywords (part).
Table 6. Co-occurrence matrix of high-frequency keywords (part).
State-Owned Forest FarmsUnder-Forestry EconomyForest ExperienceForest
Tourism
Forest HealthForest ParkState-Owned Forest AreaForest Resources
State-owned forest farms1043811519504
Under-forestry economy38940310121
Forest experience1060551101
Forest tourism1535575452
Forest health1915553423
Forest park5011443501
State-owned forest area0120520263
Forest resources411231316
Table 7. Dissimilarity matrix of high-frequency keywords (part).
Table 7. Dissimilarity matrix of high-frequency keywords (part).
State-Owned Forest FarmsUnder-Forestry EconomyForest ExperienceForest
Tourism
Forest HealthForest ParkState-Owned Forest AreaForest Resources
State-owned forest farms00.6160.9870.8050.7440.9171.0000.902
Under-forestry economy0.61601.0000.9590.9861.0000.7570.974
Forest experience0.9871.00000.9150.9110.7601.0000.968
Forest tourism0.8050.9590.91500.9090.9100.8700.934
Forest health0.7440.9860.9110.90900.9070.9460.897
Forest park0.9171.0000.7600.9100.90701.0000.958
State-owned forest area1.0000.7571.0000.8700.9461.00000.853
Forest resources0.9020.9740.9680.9340.8970.9580.8530
Table 8. Case Processing Summary.
Table 8. Case Processing Summary.
Cases
ValidMissingTotal
NPercentNPercentNPercent
42100.00042100.0
Table 9. Research topics of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
Table 9. Research topics of the paid use of state-owned forest resources.
NumberResearch Topics
1Research on the development status of paid use
2Research on forest tourism and forest health
3Research on the under-forestry economy
Table 10. Research contents of forest tourism and forest health.
Table 10. Research contents of forest tourism and forest health.
Forest TourismForest Health
1Development status of forest tourism in different regions1Industrial development of forest recreation
2Development of the forest tourism industry2Exploration of forest recreation models and paths in different areas
3Impact of forest tourism on the environment3Types of consumer demand for forest recreation
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, X.; Liang, C.; Chen, W. Exploring Current Status and Evolutionary Trends on the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources in China: A Bibliometric Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095516

AMA Style

Wei X, Liang C, Chen W. Exploring Current Status and Evolutionary Trends on the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources in China: A Bibliometric Perspective. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095516

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Xue, Chen Liang, and Wenhui Chen. 2022. "Exploring Current Status and Evolutionary Trends on the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources in China: A Bibliometric Perspective" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5516. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095516

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop