Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Workplace Mental Well Being for Sustainable SMEs: How?
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Soil Particle Size Fraction and Spatial Redistribution of 137Cs in Sloping Landscapes with Different Lynchet Heights of Terracing Hedgerows in the Remote Mountain Region of Southwestern China
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Combining Different Collaborative Learning Strategies with Problem-Based Learning in a Flipped Classroom on Program Language Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Rural and Nature Tourism Development Potential in Islands

by
Maria da Graça Batista
1,
Gualter Couto
1,*,
Rui Alexandre Castanho
2,3,4,*,
Áurea Sousa
5,
Pedro Pimentel
1 and
Célia Carvalho
6,7,8
1
School of Business and Economics and CEEAplA, University of Azores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
2
Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
3
CITUR-Madeira-Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, 9000-082 Funchal-Madeira, Portugal
4
College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
5
Faculty of Sciences and Technologies and CEEAplA, University of Azores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
6
Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Azores and CINEICC—Cognitive and Behavioral, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
7
Centre for Research and Intervention, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
8
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5289; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095289
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022

Abstract

:
It has become evident that rural tourism grew significantly during the pandemic compared to mass tourism. However, at this time, all the forecasts were wrapped in considerable uncertainty regarding travel, which is not without the elevated associated risk. Therefore, we assessed the perceptions of the entrepreneurs in relation to rural tourism activities regarding the advantages of their rural tourism activity in the Azores for customers. Furthermore, the potential for developing this typology of tourism is pivotal for obtaining very reliable data and information on this topic and enabling us to provide guidelines for the leading regional players. In this regard, an exploratory method was used to assess the perceptions of the entrepreneurs with rural tourism activities in the Azores Islands regarding the customers’ experiences and some other important aspects concerning the promotion of this type of tourism in the region. Throughout this study, it was possible to verify that the most relevant obstacles to the development of rural tourism in the Azores region are the preservation and conservation of nature and endogenous resources and delivering proper infrastructures and regional accessibilities. Contrarily, the increase in community and regional funding and support for rural tourism could be key to the prosperity of this typology of tourism in this insular territory.

1. Introduction

Generally, until 2020, the tourism industry was increasing worldwide. For example, for the Azores Islands, 2019 was remarkable regarding the touristic demand for the region. Nevertheless, this scenario changed quickly with the COVID-19 outbreak in March 2020. As mentioned by Abraham et al. [1], “(…) we assist to an unprecedented breach of confidence in world tourism demand”. If we look at some of the indicators about regional tourism demand in the Azores region, in the Spring of 2020 (based on the tourism observatory of the Azores), there was a decrease in overnight stays of more than 80% in comparison to 2019. Furthermore, in June and September 2020, this decrease was higher than 70% compared to 2019. Furthermore, according to the above-mentioned observatory data, about 71% of businesses laid off their employees during the 2020 high season. Thus, in this sense, we can say that tourism enterprises have been fronted their greatest challenge of all time.
On the other hand, it becomes evident that rural tourism was growing significantly during the pandemic compared to mass tourism [2]. In this regard, several studies in low-density and peripheral territories have shown this tendency (see: [3,4,5,6,7]).
Still, at this time, all the forecasts are wrapped by considerable uncertainty regarding travel, which is not without an elevated associated risk. Based on those premises, we assisted numerous decisions by main health actors in different nations that were reversed at the last minute, changing current decisions. Moreover, the dilemma goes on with the newest virus mutations, the so-called variants.
Considering the previous, in the current moment, we have multiple studies on the impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 on tourism and hospitality [7,8,9], as well as on prospective travel in the post-pandemic period [10,11], and some theory-based investigation regarding these problems [12,13,14] to demonstrate the consequences of the pandemic on the perceptions and tourist behaviors.
In this regard, this guides us to the necessity to adopt a new strategic reflection for the post-pandemic period, which likewise jointly aims to answer the issue of seasonality in the case of the ultra-peripheral territory of the Azores. Thus, to face seasonality, some measures could be considered as attracting new market features, being less exposed to the rainy climate, or traveling during the low season, among several other strategies that could also be considered [15].
Contextually, the promotion of the Azores destination should strengthen by the brand idea of a nature destination. This destination (Azores) is certified by EarthCheck as the world’s first sustainable insular tourist destination, complemented by the cultural characteristic of the destination, which has an expansive substantial, and immaterial cultural legacy. This destination promotion should promote differentiation, betting on an image of a quality destination that is safe, certified, a natural destination, unpolluted, and non-massified, which are all factors favorably appreciated by tourists in this tourism typology. Thereby, greater attention should be given to the digital transformations and promotion of the destination—instead of the obsolete high face-to-face publicity at tourism events, which, in many cases, failed some of the expected forecasts, excluding in the case of some global renown events.
According to Pimentel et al. [16], “(…) the poor carrying capacity of the destination and given the window of opportunity that the COVID-19 pandemic opened for destinations such as the Azores”. Moreover, those destinations are generally characterized by very low density and almost no constructed areas in nature. Furthermore, planning in the long term should be clearly defined by the goal of attracting fewer tourists that must be selected. However, adequate tourists—the ones who have money to consume and esteem the endogenous offer of the destination or respect it through moral and ethical behavior and responsible conduct, among several other characteristics—are seen as the ones that this destination should be a magnet of.
If we focus on tourism entrepreneurs, it is possible to understand the multiple benefits—i.e., the minimal start-up capital is required for SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises), typically tourism-related businesses [17,18,19]. Moreover, creating employment prospects is a positive consequence of tourism development [20]. Contextually, functional and quality workforces must ensure the success of tourism destinations [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, the boundaries and elements of small tourism businesses should be analyzed. According to Jaafar et al. [21], “(…) articulate the factors that dampen these businesses. (…) In order from most limiting the factors rated out of five, one being rarely limiting and five extremely limiting, (i) changes in the season and climate, (ii) unavailability of trends and opportunity knowledge in tourism e and (iii) lack of marketing abilities”.
In fact, engagement in tourism activities reduces the rate of unemployment among the regional populations [27] and consequently can decrease the incidence of poverty [27,28,29,30]. Accordingly, the prospect of the tourism sector is seen to enhance the quality of life and well-being of the regional societies [31,32,33,34,35,36].
Considering this, we believe that assessing the perceptions of the entrepreneurs related to rural tourism activities in the Azores region is pivotal for obtaining very reliable data and information on this topic. In the same line, it enables us to provide guidelines for the main regional actors (i.e., main challenges, regional policies, measures to face the COVID-19 pandemic crisis) for the rural tourism development in the Azores region. Thus, this article focuses precisely on the issue mentioned above, and, therefore, an essentially exploratory methodology was used to reach the predefined objectives of the research.

2. Materials and Methods

Our research is based on data collected about Azores entrepreneurs’ opinions regarding the potential of rural tourism development in the Azores region to provide guidelines for the leading regional actors concerning the sustainable development of rural tourism. The methodological approach comprised four main stages: interviews design, data collection (non-probabilistic sampling), data analysis, and outcomes description and interpretation—including a brief discussion of the results.
Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, the data were collected through web interviews in questionnaire format, with several short and direct questions regarding the theme of the investigation. However, the present paper focuses on a set of 13 items concerning the agreement levels regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allow (see Table 1), measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Totally disagree) to (5 Totally agree), and on three open-up questions concerning, respectively, obstacles for the development of rural tourism in the Azores region; regional policies that could be taken to foster the rural tourism growth in the Archipelago; and measures to face the current COVID-19 pandemic impacts on the region regarding rural tourism. The combination of the two different approaches (quantitative and qualitative) is recommended by some authors (e.g., Silva et al., 2016), as they can provide additional information. This data collection instrument was subjected to content validity and a pre-test before its application. The value (above 0.9) of Cronbach’s Alpha points to an excellent internal consistency of the 13 items in the sample under study, which indicates that this set of items can be used to assess the fullness/ authenticity of the customers’ experiences. However, the calculation of this coefficient is generally recommended for large samples.
The structured interviews were conducted during the spring and autumn months of 2020 and the winter of 2021, after the informed consent of the participants (the central tenet of research ethics involving human beings) based on the information given (rights of the participants and the purpose of the study).
The target population is concerning a set of 280 rural tourism establishments in the region found in a Google search. The sample comprises some (22) of the main Azorean entrepreneurs in rural tourism (one entrepreneur per establishment, sampling rate of about 8%—non-probability sampling), whose main sociodemographic characteristics are described in Table 1. The majority (59.1%) of the participants are male, and the age group with the highest rate is between 51 and 65 years old (49.1%). Most of the inquired/interviewed entrepreneurs have higher education (59.1%), Portuguese nationality (59.1%), and a large part is married (45.5%). As for the duration of the rural tourism activity, 27.3% of the interviewed entrepreneurs indicated “1 to 5 years”, 45.5% said “6 to 10 years,” and 27.3% accounted for “10 or more years” (Table 1). We are convinced that the intentional selection of the main entrepreneurs of the region is of crucial importance to obtaining information that could be an asset for the planning of the rural tourism sector in the post-pandemic period.
Considering the 22 entrepreneurs of our sample who indicated the island(s) where they carry out their activity related to rural tourism, we highlight that 42.9% of them are established on the island of São Miguel, and 38.1% mentioned Faial Island. The percentages regarding the distribution of the participants by the other islands are shown in Figure 1.
Concerning the type of rural tourism with which the activity of entrepreneurs is associated, it should be emphasized that the majority (68.2%) of the participants reported that their activity is referring to “Nature Tourism”. Moreover, half (50.0%) said that their activity is included in “Ecotourism” (Figure 2).
The main research questions of the present study are: What are the perceptions of the Azorean entrepreneurs in rural tourism regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allows?; How do variables such as Gender, Age Group, Education, Marital status, Nationality, and Activity running time in the activity of rural tourism, differentiate their perceptions concerning the customers’ experiences? What are the main strategies that should be adopted concerning promoting rural tourism in the Azores region (main challenges, regional policies, and measures to mitigate the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic)? Moreover, we formulated the following research hypothesis: The perceptions of the Azorean entrepreneurs in rural tourism do not vary depending on the number of years of activity in the rural tourism sector.
Data were analyzed essentially based on exploratory data analysis methods, including the nonlinear (categorical) principal component analysis (CATPCA). The goal of nonlinear principal component analysis (NLPCA) is the same as that of principal component analysis (PCA), namely, to reduce the dimensionality of a data set to a smaller number of uncorrelated variables (designed by principal components) that represent the information in the original data as closely as possible [37]. The same authors refer that “the difference between the methods is that PCA can only reveal linear relationships, whereas NPLCA can, in addition, reveal nonlinear relationships by quantifying categorical or nonlinearly related variables in a way that is optimal (in a statistical sense) for the PCA goal” [37,38]. In the present study, we applied the CATPCA using the optimal procedure scaling available from IBM SPSS Statistics. The fact that the sample used is non-probabilistic does not allow the generalization of the conclusions to the population, so the application of hypothesis tests is not recommended. However, some non-parametric tests were used (Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn’s test) only for indicative purposes in order to verify the possible existence of significant differences between the groups of individuals described by the sociodemographic variables, presented in Table 1, about the level of agreement regarding each of the items under analysis.

3. Results

Contextually, to address the participants’ perceptions, an agreement level sentences question was made regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allows (Table 2 and Table 3).
Concerning the sociodemographic variables shown in Table 1, except for the variable “Activity running time”, no significant differences were found among the groups defined by the categories of the other sociodemographic variables (p > 0.05) regarding the responses given to the items under analysis. Thus, significant differences were found between at least two of the groups corresponding to the categories of the Activity running time in the case of items “e—Feel that the Azores are an authentic destination” (H = 6.117; p = 0.047) and “h—Enjoy the local cuisine” (H = 9.135; p = 0.010). The application of Dunn’s test indicated that: in the case of item “e”, the statistically significant differences (p = 0.042) occurred between those who have worked for fewer years in the tourism sector (“1–5 years”) and those who have worked longer (“+10 years”); and (ii) in the case of item “h”, there were statistically significant differences between those working longer (“+10 years”) and: those working for less time (1–5 years), p = 0.016; those who have worked in the rural tourism sector for 6 to 10 years (“6–10 years old”), p = 0.034.
Regarding the advantages of its rural tourism activity in the Azores for customers (Table 3), the statements regarding which the respondents’ levels of agreement are higher are the following: (g) Feel safe; (d) Feel confidence in your staff; (e) Feel that the Azores are an authentic destination; (j) Carry out activities in nature; (m) The desire to visit the Azores again in the context of Rural Tourism; (n) A story to tell friends/family; and (f) Feeling that the population is welcoming.
After using CATPCA (Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization), three principal components were extracted, explaining 93.6% (64.7% + 16.6% + 12.3%) of the data variance, which has eigenvalues greater than one and a very satisfactory internal consistency of the items (Table 4 and Table 5).
The most important items for component two are (h) Enjoy the local cuisine and (i) Buy local products, so this component can be called “Local commerce”/food and souvenirs. The items most associated/correlated with the third component are (a) Enjoy a complete tourist package and (l) Carry out activities at sea (i.e., fishing, boat trips, others), so this component can be called “Other activities” (i.e., nautical activities). In this sense, the most relevant items for component one concern the social interactions, experiences, and contact with nature. Furthermore, three open-up questions were made to the participants to assess their perceptions of a broader concept. These questions are intended to explore and identify the three main challenges for rural tourism development in the Azores region (Table 6). Moreover, it shows which regional public policies should be implemented to foster rural tourism growth in the Archipelago (Table 7) and the measures to implement to face the current COVID-19 pandemic impacts on the region regarding rural tourism (Table 8). To summarize the open questions, the answers were grouped into themes.
In the respondents’ perception, the main challenges to the growth of rural tourism in the Azores are “Infrastructures/Accessibilities” (opinion of 31.6% of the respondents) and “Preservation and Conservation of Nature and Endogenous Resources”.
In the respondents’ perception, the main regional policies that could be taken to foster the rural tourism growth in the Archipelago are “Increase the European and Regional Funding and Support to Rural Tourism” (referred to by 47.1% of the participants), “Reduce Mass Tourism Incentives” (17.6%), and Structural Changes on the Sector (17.6%).
In view of the current situation of pandemic crisis, in the opinion of 41,7% of the respondents, the main measure that must be taken to counter/mitigate the negative impact on rural tourism in the region is “Increase the Health Measures and Safety on the Destination”.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In the Azores, rural tourism activity increased significantly during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic compared to mass tourism. This performance also occurs in other low-density and peripherical territories. In the Azores, nature, endogenous resources, and low density played a crucial role in rural tourism performance during the pandemic. From now on, Azores promotion should focus on differentiation, betting on an image of a quality destination, safe, certified, natural destination, unpolluted, non-massified, all factors highly appreciated by rural tourism lovers. Furthermore, destination promotion should benefit from digital transformation to selected high-end market niches instead of the obsolete face-to-face promotion at global tourism events.
This setup incites tourism entrepreneurs since a minimal start-up capital is required, and management proximity is the key to delivering high-standard service to tourists and fulfilling their expectations during a rural tourism stay. Thus, entrepreneurs’ opinions about the potential of rural tourism in the Azores are insightful to better position the Azores’ rural tourism shortly.
Our research lies on an experimental methodology upon web interviews with entrepreneurs using a questionnaire format with 13 items measured in a 5-point Likert scale ranging from totally disagree to agree totally. Of 22 Azorean entrepreneurs in rural tourism, almost 60% are male, nearly 50% are aged between 51 and 65 years, about 60% have higher education, and 45.5% run the business up to 10 years, 42.9% in São Miguel Island.
As expected, entrepreneurs mainly act in nature tourism and ecotourism. Unfortunately, one of the leading rural tourism entrepreneurs’ handicaps is gastronomy, mainly because it lacks adequate know-how to add high standard service to the high-quality local food products (vegetables, fish, and meat). Note that gastronomic activity seems to be part of the second (of three) principal component according to CATPAC results, having relevant importance in the rural tourism experience in the Azores. These insights could help policymakers better promote rural tourism development in the future, such as reinforcing financial support for professional qualifications and entrepreneurs initiatives in gastronomic activities.
Of the three principal components that identify the main challenges for rural tourism development in the Azores, the most relevant are the social interactions, experiences, and contact with nature. Less relevant are other activities than accommodation and gastronomy. According to previous studies, rural tourism, particularly in rural island contexts, can productively integrate both material and immaterial heritage manifestations as well as more holistic place-based and cultural landscape approaches—in which quality (rather than quantity), sensorial aspects, and environmental sustainability are also taken into account [39,40].
In order to develop rural tourism, the concept of authenticity must be critically considered. Going through the literature on community-based tourism, Blapp and Mitas [41] analyze how different theories of authenticity (objective, constructive, and existential authenticity) have been applied and propose a theory of authenticity applicable to creative tourism development in rural areas. Thus, these authors claim that it may be more useful to speak of authenticities, varying according to regional, temporal, and cultural contexts and ontological positions [39].
Main research outputs show that the most relevant obstacles to the development of rural tourism in the Azores region are the preservation and conservation of nature and endogenous resources and delivering proper infrastructures and regional accessibilities. Boosting rural tourism growth in the Azores should be attained with higher financial support from the EU and regional government to rural tourism entrepreneurs. This focus will bring sustainable prosperity to insular rural tourism and foresee a faster recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic economic hit, naturally complemented by health measures increase and safety on the destination.
This research is also interesting to the academia and the literature regarding insular regions whose economy is interlinked with tourism. Furthermore, this paper is particularly relevant for rural tourism once we can develop some further research questions from it as: Will these factors remain the same, or will they somewhat change with the extinction of the pandemic situation? Will tourists who experience the supply adjustment to these factors consider it crucial as suppliers? Therefore, this topic has ample space for continuous applied research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C. and R.A.C.; methodology, Á.S.; software, Á.S.; validation, G.C., P.P. and M.d.G.B.; formal analysis, R.A.C.; investigation, Á.S.; resources, G.C.; data curation, Á.S., C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.C.; writing—review and editing, R.A.C.; visualization, G.C. and P.P.; supervision, R.A.C.; project administration, M.d.G.B.; funding acquisition, G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper is financed by Portuguese national funds through FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project number UIDB/00685/2020 and also by the project GREAT-Genuine Rural Experiences in the Azores Tourism, with the code: ACORES-01-0145-FEDER-000089.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available. Furthermore, it is possible to contact one of the study authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abraham, V.; Bremser, K.; Carreno, M.; Crowley-Cyr, L.; Moreno, M. Perceived COVID-19 impacts and travel avoidance: Application of protection motivation theory. Tour. Rev. 2020, 76, 701–717. [Google Scholar]
  2. Castanho, R.A.; Couto, G.; Santos, R. Introductory Chapter: Rural Tourism as a Catalyst for Sustainable Regional Development of Peripheral Territories; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Couto, G.; Castanho, R.A.; Pimentel, P.; Carvalho, C.B.; Sousa, Á. The Potential of Adventure Tourism in the Azores: Focusing on the Regional Strategic Planning. In Advances in Tourism, Technology and Systems, ICOTTS 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Abreu, A., Liberato, D., González, E.A., Garcia Ojeda, J.C., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; Volume 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Castanho, R.; Couto, G.; Pimentel, P.; Sousa, Á.; Carvalho, C.; Batista, M. The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak on the Accommodation Selection of Azorean Tourists. A Study Based on the Assessment of the Azores Population’s Attitudes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, L. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural tourism: A case study from Portugal. Anatolia 2021, 33, 157–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Couto, G.; Castanho, R.; Pimentel, P.; Carvalho, C.; Sousa, A.; Santos, C. The Impacts of COVID-19 Crisis over the Tourism Expectations of the Azores Archipelago Residents. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gossling, S.; Scott, D.; Hall, M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 29, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deloitte. Deloitte Access Economics 2020. Available online: www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/covid-19-recovery-tourism-sector.html (accessed on 9 October 2020).
  9. Melly, D.; Hanrahan, J. Tourist biosecurity awareness and risk mitigation for outdoor recreation: Management implications for Ireland. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2020, 31, 100313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wen, J.; Kozak, M.; Yang, S.; Liu, F. COVID-19: Potential effects on Chinese citizens’ lifestyle and travel. Tour. Rev. 2020, 76, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hotle, S.; Murray-Tuite, P.; Singh, K. Influenza risk perception and travel-related health protection behavior in the US: Insights for the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 5, 100127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Castanho, R.A.; Couto, G.; Pimentel, P.; Carvalho, C.; Sousa, Á.; Batista, M.D.G. Analysing the Public Administration and Decision-Makers Perceptions Regarding the Potential of Rural Tourism Development in the Azores Region. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2021, 16, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jackson, M. Utilizing attribution theory to develop new insights into tourism experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 38, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Couto, G.; Pimentel, P.; Batista, M.D.G.; Sousa, Á.; Carvalho, C.; Castanho, R.A. The Potential of Rural Tourism Development in the Azores Islands from the Perspective of Public Administration and Decision-Makers. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 2021, 17, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Castanho, R.A.; Couto, G.; Pimentel, P. Principles of Sustainable Tourism and Cultural Management in Rural and Ultra-peripheral Territories: Extracting Guidelines for Application in the Azores Archipelago. Cult. Manag. Sci. Educ. 2020, 4, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pimentel, P.; Oliveira, A.; Couto, G.; Crispim Ponte, J.; Castanho, R.A. The Azores Archipelago as a Region with Vast Potential for the Development of Adventure and Slow Tourism. In Peripheral Territories, Tourism, and Regional Development; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meyer, D.F.; Meyer, N. The role and impact of tourism on local economic development: A comparative study. Afr. J. Phys. Health Educ. Recreat. Danc. 2015, 21, 197–214. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jaafar, M.; Rasoolimannesh, S.M.; Lonik, K.A.T. Tourism growth and entrepreneurship: Empirical analysis of development of rural highlands. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 14, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. Management Theory, Innovation, and Organisation: A Model of Managerial Competencies; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  20. Crouch, I.C.; Ritchie, J.R.B. Tourism, competitiveness and societal prosperity. J. Bus. Res. 1999, 44, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van der Schyff, T. The Development and Testing of a Measurement Instrument for Regional Tourism Competitiveness Facilitating Economic Development. Ph.D. Thesis, North-West University (NWU), Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ulucak, R.; Yücel, A.G.; İlkay, S.Ç. Dynamics of tourism demand in Turkey: Panel data analysis using gravity model. Tour. Econ. 2020, 26, 1394–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Koçak, E.; Ulucak, R.; Sentürk Ulucak, Z. The impact of tourism developments on CO2 emissions: An advanced panel data estimation. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 33, 100611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kişi, N. A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey. Sustainability 2019, 11, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Candrea, A.N.; Bouriaud, L. A Stakeholders’ Analysis of Potential Sustainable Tourism Development Strategies in Piatra Craiului National Park. Ann. Res. 2009, 52, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharif, N.M.; Lonik, K.’A.T. Sustaining the Entrepreneurship in Rural Tourism Development. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst. 2017, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sanagustín-Fons, M.V.; Fierro, J.A.M.; Patiño, M.G.G. Rural tourism: A sustainable alternative. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zaei, M.E.; Zaei, M.E. The Impacts of Tourism Industry on Host Community. Eur. J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2013, 1, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  29. Simkova, E. Strategic approaches to rural tourism and sustainable development of rural areas. Agric. Econ. 2008, 53, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Okech, R.N.; Haghiri, M.; George, P.B. Rural Tourism as a Sustainable Development Alternative: An Analysis with Special Reference To Luanda, Kenya. Cultura 2012, 6, 36–54. [Google Scholar]
  31. Aref, F.; Gill, S.S.; Aref, F. Tourism Development in Local Communities: As a Community Development Approach. J. Am. Sci. 2010, 6, 155–161. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ahn, B.; Lee, B.; Shafer, C. Operationalizing sustainability in regional tourism planning: An application of the limits of acceptable change framework. Tour. Manag. 2002, 23, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kokkranikal, J.; McLellan, R.; Bau, T. Island Tourism and Sustainability: A Case Study of the Lakshadweep Islands. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 11, 426–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, A. Tourism in Rural Areas: Kedah, Malaysia. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 878–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lordkipanidze, M.; Brezet, H.; Backman, M. The Entrepreneurship Factor in Sustainable Tourism Development. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Miller, G. The development of indicators for sustainable tourism: Results of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers. Tour. Manag. 2001, 22, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Linting, M.; Kooij, V.D. Nonlinear Principal Components Analysis with CATPCA. J. Personal. Assess. 2012, 94, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Silva, O.; Sousa, Á. Gestion de la qualité dans la recherche en sciences sociales et humaines: Articulation entre les méthodes qualitatives et quantitatives. Rech. Qual. Hors-Série. 2016, 18, 171–181. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cardoso de Mello, J. Moinhos Portugueses: História Cultural, Economia e Turismo Criativo. Rev. Iberoam. Tur. 2018, 8, 21–45. [Google Scholar]
  40. Baixinho, A.; Santos, C.; Couto, G.; Soares de Albergaria, I.; Sampaio da Silva, L.; Damião Medeiros, P.; Maria Neves Simas, R. Creative Tourism on Islands: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 2020, 12, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Blapp, M.; Mitas, O. The Role of Authenticity in Rural Creative Tourism. In A Research Agenda for Creative Tourism; Duxbury, N., Richards, G., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2019; pp. 28–40. ISBN 978-178-811-071-6. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Islands of the Azores Archipelago where entrepreneurs carry out their rural tourism activity (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Figure 1. Islands of the Azores Archipelago where entrepreneurs carry out their rural tourism activity (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Sustainability 14 05289 g001
Figure 2. Type of rural tourism to which the activity is associated (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Figure 2. Type of rural tourism to which the activity is associated (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Sustainability 14 05289 g002
Table 1. Some sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. Distribution of the respondents (%).
Table 1. Some sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. Distribution of the respondents (%).
VariablesCategoriesFrequency%
GenderFemale940.9
Male1359.1
Total22100
Age Group18–35418.2
36–50731.8
51–65940.9
65+29.1
Total22100
EducationBasic Education29.1
High School731.8
University1359.1
Total 22100
Marital statusSingle627.3
Marriage1045.5
Other627.3
Total22100
NationalityPortuguese1359.1
Foreign940.9
Total22100
Activity running time1–5 years627.3
6–10 years1045.5
+10 years627.3
Total22100
Table 2. Agreement levels regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allow.
Table 2. Agreement levels regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allow.
Do You Think that Your Rural Tourism Activity in the Azores Allows Customers to:
SentencesAgreement Levels (%)
1
(Totally Disgaree)
2345
(Totally Agree)
a—Enjoy a complete tourist package9.523.84.833.328.6
b—Contact with people, local life and customs0.04.59.145.540.9
c—Meet new people and create new friendships0.09.122.727.340.9
d—Feel confidence in your staff0.04.89.533.352.4
e—Feel that the Azores are an authentic destination0.04.59.118.268.2
f—Feeling that the population is welcoming0.04.54.545.545.5
g—Feel safe0.04.59.14.581.8
h—Enjoy the local cuisine4.513.613.636.431.8
i—Buy local products0.09.122.722.745.5
j—Carry out activities in nature0.04.54.518.272.7
l—Carry out activities at sea (eg fishing, boat trips, others)0.09.118.222.750.0
m—The desire to visit the Azores again in the context of Rural Tourism0.04.54.527.363.6
n—A story to tell friends/family0.04.59.122.763.6
The highest values found are in bold.
Table 3. Agreement levels regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allow—grouped by items.
Table 3. Agreement levels regarding the customers’ experiences their rural tourism activity allow—grouped by items.
ItemsModeQ1Q2Q3
a—Enjoy a complete tourist package4245
b—Contact with people, local life and customs4445
c—Meet new people and create new friendships5345
d—Feel confidence in your staff5455
e—Feel that the Azores are an authentic destination5455
f—Feeling that the population is welcoming4 and 5445
g—Feel safe5555
h—Enjoy the local cuisine4345
i—Buy local products5345
j—Carry out activities in nature5455
l—Carry out activities at sea (e.g., fishing, boat trips, others)534,55
m—The desire to visit the Azores again in the context of Rural Tourism5455
n—A story to tell friends/family5455
The highest values found are in bold.
Table 4. CATPCA—Model Summary Rotation.
Table 4. CATPCA—Model Summary Rotation.
Model Summary Rotation a
DimensionCronbach’s AlphaVariance Accounted for Total (Eigenvalue)
10.9658.406
20.7502.160
30.8071.601
Total0.994 b12.167
a Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization; b Total Cronbach’s Alpha is based on the total Eigenvalue.
Table 5. CATPCA—Rotated Component Loadings.
Table 5. CATPCA—Rotated Component Loadings.
Rotated Component Loadings a
Dimension
123
n—A story to tell friends/family0.9620.1610.206
b—Contact with people, local life and customs0.9610.1600.207
f—Feeling that the population is welcoming0.9610.1620.208
d—Feel confidence in your staff0.9600.1710.204
g—Feel safe0.9600.1550.217
j—Carry out activities in nature0.9600.1620.213
e—Feel that the Azores are an authentic destination0.9590.1700.211
m—The desire to visit the Azores again in the context of Rural Tourism0.9550.1790.225
c—Meet new people and create new friendships0.825−0.160−0.184
h—Enjoy the local cuisine0.0190.931−0.101
i—Buy local products0.2770.888−0.020
a—Enjoy a complete tourist package0.162−0.3300.896
l—Carry out activities at sea (eg fishing, boat trips, others)0.5000.3900.630
a Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. The highest values found are in bold.
Table 6. Obstacles for the development of rural tourism in the Azores region (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Table 6. Obstacles for the development of rural tourism in the Azores region (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Themes(%)
Infrastructures/Accessibilities31.6
Preservation and Conservation of Nature and Endogenous Resources26.3
Difficulty in Accessing Communitary Funds15.8
Resisting to the Tourism Massification15.8
Bureaucratic Obstacles at the Regional Governance Level and Lack of Sustainability Policies10.5
The highest values found are in bold.
Table 7. Regional policies that could be taken to foster the rural tourism growth in the Archipelago (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Table 7. Regional policies that could be taken to foster the rural tourism growth in the Archipelago (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Themes(%)
Increase the Communitary and Regional Funding and Support to Rural Tourism47.1
Reduce Mass Tourism Incentives17.6
Structural Changes on the Sector17.6
Foster the Nature Protection and Endogenous Resources5.9
Increase the Destination Marketing and Advertisement5.9
Improve the Regional Accessibilities5.9
The highest values found are in bold.
Table 8. Measures to face the current COVID-19 pandemic impacts on the region regarding rural tourism (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Table 8. Measures to face the current COVID-19 pandemic impacts on the region regarding rural tourism (% of cases—Multiple response analysis).
Themes(%)
Increase the Health Measures and Safety on the Destination41.7
Invert on the Support of Rural Tourism Small-Medium Enterprises16.7
Foster the Internal Tourism16.7
Professional Training on the Sector16.7
Avoid Reducing the Destination Price8.2
The highest values found are in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batista, M.d.G.; Couto, G.; Castanho, R.A.; Sousa, Á.; Pimentel, P.; Carvalho, C. The Rural and Nature Tourism Development Potential in Islands. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095289

AMA Style

Batista MdG, Couto G, Castanho RA, Sousa Á, Pimentel P, Carvalho C. The Rural and Nature Tourism Development Potential in Islands. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095289

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batista, Maria da Graça, Gualter Couto, Rui Alexandre Castanho, Áurea Sousa, Pedro Pimentel, and Célia Carvalho. 2022. "The Rural and Nature Tourism Development Potential in Islands" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095289

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop