Next Article in Journal
Optimal Control of Energy Systems in Net-Zero Energy Buildings Considering Dynamic Costs: A Case Study of Zero Carbon Building in Hong Kong
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Hazard Housing Safety Perceptions of Those Involved with Housing Construction in Puerto Rico
Previous Article in Journal
Management and Mapping Ecosystem Services in a Privately Owned Natura 2000 Site: An Insight into the Stellantis–La Mandria Site (Italy)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Affecting the Intention of Multi-Family House Residents to Age in Place in a Potential Naturally Occurring Retirement Community of Seoul in South Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Quality of ETICS in the Context of Energy and Social Changes (Case Study)

by
Darja Kubečková
Department of Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, L. Podéště 1875, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3135; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063135
Submission received: 20 January 2022 / Revised: 28 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 8 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Housing — the Basic Principle of Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The paper focuses on the quality of external composite ETICS (External Technical Insulation Composite System) façade systems from a long-term perspective in the context of energy and social changes and subsequent paths of housing construction, including reconstructions and renovations of prefabricated housing developments. These changes follow mainly from the EU energy concept and strategy in relation to housing and have an impact potential well beyond 2030. The aim of the paper is to show, based on field research and laboratory diagnostics on a selected reference sample of housing affected by biodegradation, to what extent the quality of ETICS façades is affected by technological aspects during the application of ETICS exterior plasters and during the implementation of photocatalytic coatings. The investigation shows that the influence of the human factor is one of the main aspects of negative impacts.

1. Introduction

Impacts of the energy crisis are leading to changes in society, and to a change in thinking. This is reflected, among other things, in the construction sector, including new housing construction and renovations. The pressures to reduce the energy demands of buildings bring not only new technologies and new materials, but also give rise to specific problems. In Central Europe, the application of external contact thermal insulation systems, known as ETICS (External Technical Insulation Composite System) [1], has become an affordable and widespread technology when it comes to reconstructions that include the building envelope. The ETICS system has been known in Europe since the 1950s. In the Czech Republic, the application of ETICS has seen a great expansion since the 1990s, mainly due to increasing pressures to save energy. According to publications [2,3,4], ETICS inarguably has many advantages. It improves the energy balance of the building, significantly contributes to savings, is an environmentally friendly material, is recyclable, is part of the circular economy and, last but not least, significantly improves the aesthetic appearance of renovated buildings, thus achieving the aesthetic improvement of urban areas, especially prefabricated panel housing developments. Available data show that, for example, in the Czech Republic, one of the most widespread insulating materials is expanded polystyrene, whose annual consumption in construction is close to 4 million cubic meters [5].
However, many years of experience have shown that it is a mistake to think that ETICS is a maintenance-free material. ETICS requires regular and systematic maintenance. A façade, that is fitted with ETICS without ensuring the provision of systematic care and maintenance will, in approximately 5 years, be affected by biodegradation—especially if it is a facade that is located in an exposed position (such as in proximity to greenery, water areas, northern orientation of the façade without sunlight, etc.). We currently define biodegradation as a modern problem occurring on façades with ETICS. The application of ETICS to perimeter claddings is therefore often associated with a higher risk of biodegradation compared to other façade solutions, such as double façade systems with a ventilated air gap, cladding panels, etc.
To a certain extent, the ever-increasing thickness of the thermal insulation contributes to the biodegradation damage of facades with ETICS. On the one hand, we achieve better thermal and energy properties in accordance with the EU strategy [6,7,8,9,10]; on the other hand, due to generally known building and physical links [11,12], a suitable basis for the colonization of the facade by biodegrading microorganisms is created [13,14].
The impacted, biodegraded façade raises the question, both with the lay and professional public, as to whether the biodegradation of the façade is not harmful to health. The scientific and professional literature and other scientific sources show that the predominant microorganisms in the affected façade are Chlorophycae, Alternaria, Aspergillus, and Cladosporium spores [15,16,17]. It has not yet been found or published that the spores of these microorganisms settling on the outer surfaces of the ETICS perimeter cladding cause serious health problems. In general, it can only be stated that, for example, molds, algae, fungi, and typhus can cause allergenic reactions in particularly sensitive individuals or allergy sufferers [18]. These people may be more sensitive to infections. However, the inhalation of these allergens from biodegraded areas on the ETICS surface, by an individual who is indoors, and this causing an allergic reaction, is very unlikely. An individual’s exposure to allergens is limited by the duration of exposure and the concentration of possible allergens. For residential buildings, we do not expect a large migration of allergens from the external environment from the ETICS surface to the interior. Most apartment buildings, built in the latter half of the last century in the Czech Republic, especially apartment buildings built using prefabricated panel technologies, have ventilation of living rooms by direct ventilation or micro-ventilation [19,20,21]; the concentration of the aforementioned allergens, in a longer period of time, is not expected.
One of the variants for protecting the outer perimeter cladding with ETICS from biodegradation is the application of a photocatalytic coating as part of the systematic care and maintenance of apartment buildings. Materials using photocatalytic active oxide (TiO2) appear to be promising [22]. Photocatalytically active coatings in the form of paints can, thanks to their oxidizing potential, prevent the growth of mold and algae on house facades. A prerequisite, however, is that the surface of the facade is properly clean and free of all impurities and dust before applying the photocatalytic coating, and will not be wet, because these components offer the potential for the settlement and viability of microorganisms. Another is that the application will be performed correctly with respect to the technology.

2. Method of Study

The aim of the paper is to compare, based on diagnostics and their results, whether there are obvious differences in manifestations of biodegradation on facades with ETICS that have a photocatalytic coating and the facades with ETICS without a photocatalytic coating. The basic starting point is field and laboratory analysis and surveying. The facades of selected apartment buildings with the ETICS application (see Appendix A) serve as the background material for the laboratory analysis; samples were taken from the façade surface for diagnosis and subsequent laboratory analysis, followed by a comparison and evaluation. The procedure is divided into three steps and is shown in Figure 1. The number of samples taken and the composition of the cladding are given in Table 1. Samples were always taken from the north or northwest side of the building, in places where biodegradation was more than 0.50 m2. Three samples were taken from each apartment building; a total of six samples were taken for diagnostics and laboratory analysis.
Characterization of individual steps according to Figure 1:
  • Selection of urbanized area with housing development and selection of the building (field survey);
  • Visual inspection of selected objects and diagnostics including examination of the influence of external factors on the growth of microorganisms (field survey);
  • Sampling and microscopic survey of the surface of external plasters (diagnostics);
  • Laboratory analysis of collected samples, definition of the type of microorganisms (diagnostics);
  • Comparison and evaluation.

3. Theoretical Basis

The theoretical basis of the issue lies in structural architectural work for both new buildings and reconstructed buildings. When applying the principles of reducing the energy ratings of buildings, it is necessary to pay attention to the complexity of interaction links “buildings-materials and technology-environmental contexts”.
To investigate the essence of the biodegradation of facades, in addition to environmental contexts (for example, proximity to water and greenery and the direction of prevailing winds, the direction the building faces, dust concentration, industrial environment, etc.), we must look at the theoretical foundations of thermal processes in building structures and the technical properties of building materials and products, including their technological processes.
The theoretical basis of biodegradation is based on the fact that microorganisms need moisture, nutrients, light, and oxygen for life. ETICS external plasters are more stressed by moisture than plasters of single-layer perimeter structures (for example, a panel concrete wall or a masonry wall). Water from the surface of the outer external plasters on the substrate, which is not provided with ETICS, migrates by capillary conductivity towards the dry surface, and thus the occurrence of a water emulsion compared to ETICS facades is significantly short term. In contrast, the polystyrene used in ETICS is insoluble in water and has a closed microscopic structure, so that closed pores in their structure absorb almost no water, and water is concentrated at the surface [23,24]. In contrast to buildings without ETICS, the surface layer of buildings with ETICS is not heated, especially in the autumn and spring months, by the heat that escapes from the interior of the buildings. On the contrary, the greater the thickness of the insulation, the greater the theoretical prediction of moisture on the outer surface and the impact on the facade by biodegradation—the facade is wet. The outer plasters are strongly cooled, particularly on clear nights, when the surface temperature of ETICS decreases faster than the ambient air temperature. If the temperature drops below the dew point, moisture is precipitated on the cold surface of the facade. As a result of cooling, there is condensation and moisture, which is kept on the facade surface, especially on the northern sides of the building or sides that are more shaded. Thus, the conditions for the growth of microorganisms become favorable, as microorganisms have a sufficient nutrient supply. In masonry without thermal insulation, the risk of night condensation last for approximately 2 months of the calendar year. In masonry with thermal insulation, there is a risk of water vapor condensation on the I surface under night conditions for up to 6 months [25].
The assessment of ETICS durability is defined by legislative documents and EAD Directive 040083-00-0404 [26,27]. The Directive lists a number of technical aspects that relate to the durability and aging of ETICS. However, environmental aspects arising from the built-up area environment are not taken into account, such as impacts from industrial areas and air quality (airborne dust concentrations), the proximity to greenery and water, the impact of prevailing winds, technological aspects of ETICS execution relating to the quality exterior plasters, etc. They are not appropriately taken into account in the structural physical context and physical processes that compare environmental environments, the buildings, the materials, and the technologies (see above).

3.1. Analysis and Evaluation of Apartment Building Number 1

The apartment building is located in an urbanized residential area. The apartment building was built in the 1970s. There is park greenery near the apartment building and there are no water areas near the apartment building that would predict the possibility of the facade being attacked by biodegradation agents such as algae, fungi, and hypha. The exterior perimeter cladding of Apartment building number 1 is comprised according to Table 1. (number of samples, 1). The perimeter cladding is provided with a photocatalytic coating, and the façade of the apartment building is not regularly cleaned (approximately in a five-year cycle). The age of the photocatalytic coating is more than 5 years.
The condition of the façade in the area of the silicone plaster, as derived from 3 samples, is shown in Figure 2; the biodegradation is visually perceptible.

3.2. Analysis and Assessment of Apartment Building Number 2

The apartment building is also located in an urbanized residential area and was built in the 1980s. There is a park with mature greenery near the apartment building and there are no water areas near the apartment building that would predict the possibility of the façade being attacked by biodegradation agents such as algae, fungi, and hypha. The exterior perimeter cladding of Apartment building number 2 is comprised according to Table 1. (number of samples, 2). The perimeter cladding was not provided with a photocatalytic coating, and the façade of the apartment building is not regularly cleaned (approximately in a five-year cycle). The issue of biodegradation in this type of apartment building, and others with the same constructional and material design, has been described in detail in the literature [4,28]. The state of the façade derived from 3 samples is shown in Figure 3; marked, surface-wide biodegradation damage greater than 0.50 m2 is visually perceptible.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Results of the Apartment Building Number 1

The results of diagnostics and microscopic evaluation show that, at the site of biodegradation damage, the plaster is heavily degraded by lichens and also by black mold. A microscopic analysis (using an optical microscope) also shows that molds and lichens are located below the surface of the photocatalytic coating and grow out of small micro-fissures and cracks in the photocatalytic coating. The assumption that the roots of the biotic infestation are below the surface of the coating was supported by electron microscopy. The coating layer was found to be approximately 50 μm, which is a very weak protective layer, as a typical coating layer is usually 150 to 500 μm and is applied in 2 to 3 coats, see Figure 4a,b and Figure 5, in the side section of the paint. Figure 5 shows a top view and the photocatalytic coating at 100,000× magnification, showing the nanostructured character of the protective layer surface in the range of 30 to 150 nm, which corresponds to a photocatalytic coating with binders [29,30].

4.2. Results of the Apartment Building Number 2

From the diagnostic results and microscopy evaluation, it follows that the site of the biodegradation the façade has been degraded by cyanobacteria, algae, and lichens. These microorganisms were easily detectable by electron microscopy, confirming a group of green terrestrial algae-forming colonies, see Figure 6a,b.

4.3. Technological Aspects of Exterior ETICS Facades

Technological aspects are very important when applying ETICS external plasters, including the technology of applying protective photocatalytic coatings. Any non-compliance with strict technological procedures forms the basis for a biotic attack on the façade, even though the façade is treated with a photocatalytic coating. If the surface is not thoroughly diagnosed and the base is not cleaned in accordance with the prescribed regulations [30], undesirable phenomena in the form of the colonization of facades by microorganisms may occur. An example of a technological error can be seen in Figure 7a,b, where, upon microscopic examination, structural anomalies (of a technological nature) are apparent, which arose during the execution of exterior ETICS facades in the form of micro-fissures or micro-abrasions. These can eventually contribute to greater absorption and accumulation of water and moisture, thereby promoting or providing the basis for the growth of microorganisms. The surface quality of the external plaster must not show any structural anomalies, and the surface must maintain its integrity.

4.4. Remarks

The results of field research, diagnostics, and laboratory research show that the degradation of the external surface of ETICS occurs both in a façade that is not treated with a photocatalytic coating, as well as in a façade that is treated with photocatalytic coating, see Table 2.
The first negative phenomenon to be perceived is the color change of the facade, which reduces the quality of the aesthetic appearance when looking at the building. This can be characterized as a secondary phenomenon because, upon deeper examination, it was found that in selected samples the primary negative factor occurs in the phase of diagnostics of the base layer before the actual application of the photocatalytic coating or in inconsistent technological implementation. Technological error usually leads to stress in the pore system of the exterior plasters of ETICS, and the result of this reaction is an increase in the size of the pores in the plaster. Then, due to natural building and physical phenomena and regularities, there is a greater strain on the facade by water and moisture (data on diagnostics, implementation technology, etc., can be monitored on the basis of an entry in the construction diary; the construction diary is an integral part of the reconstruction work and is a key document in the construction and reconstruction process).
Although the reference sample is small, the results can be interpreted for similar types of housing construction (especially prefabricated housing construction), in the Czech Republic. This assumption can be pronounced on the basis of data and survey results for prefabricated housing constructions implemented in the Ostrava-Karvina region, in two selected locations. Prefabricated housing constructions were not equipped with ETICS after 2000. The results showed that defects and disorders were very similar, if not the same, independent of the locality where the panel housing construction was located.
Reconstruction work to improve thermal energy properties with ETICS applications has been used in the Czech Republic since the start or redevelopment, and it expanded with the introduction of state subsidies and financial support (See Appendix B, Figure A1 and Figure A2).
The application of ETICS to housing is widespread throughout Europe; it is also supported by the European Union, in terms of sustainability. Therefore, the issue needs to be further addressed in relation to new strategies [31,32].
Further research of the issue of biodegradation of ETICS must not be neglected. Future directions of research must especially focus on:
  • Diagnostic aspects prior to the actual use of ETICS or before the application of protective photocatalytic coatings following the recommended standards and methodologies;
  • Diagnostics and laboratory analyses of ETICS surfaces, which are affected by micro cracks, to determine whether these create the potential for the growth of carcinogenic fungi under external plaster, and to eliminate the possible potency of allergens;
  • Environmental contexts in the given urbanized housing development zone.

5. Conclusions

A good standard of living is a basic component and necessity in people’s lives. The approach to housing quality assessment in the 21st century is multidisciplinary. Healthy and good quality housing must respect not only the technical and building principles of design and construction, but also the social, cultural, and environmental contexts.
In the 21st century, housing has taken a significantly different course of development than in previous centuries. The main role in its development is played by the energy aspect, which has an impact on all economic areas, including the construction of new flats and the reconstruction of existing housing developments. The innovation potential in construction has a dynamic character in the application of new materials and nanotechnologies. However, great attention must be paid to the quality of construction, the quality of reconstructions and, finally, the standard of the indoor environment. The application of ETICS spanning a monitored period of over 30 years shows great potential for further development. However, it is necessary to eliminate the influence of the human factor, which can negatively affect the resulting quality; this avoids the “trial and error” method. ETICS application must be understood as an efficient technology that leads to environmental protection, improves the energy performance of apartment buildings, and is efficient.
Emphasis needs to be placed on balancing the main pillars of construction in terms of energy efficiency, namely the sustainable structural and architectural design of buildings, efficient technologies, and the use of renewable resources. These pillars relate to new and renovated buildings. ETICS is an irreplaceable component of construction, especially for reconstructed buildings.
The results of the case study show that, in connection with the application of ETICS, all the risks occurring when implementing ETICS must be addressed, by ensuring the necessary quality in the implementation of ETICS. This can be achieved by minimizing or completely eliminating resources and risk factors that create the potential of possible biotic infestation. In particular, this involves a thorough diagnostic of the substrate before starting ETICS work (elimination of the organic infestation of the original substrate, cleaning of the substrate, elimination of moisture in the original substrate), the consistent technological procedure for performing all layers of ETICS, the choice of external plaster with less grain, and application of photocatalytic protective coatings regular and systematic maintenance in a five-year cycle. Excluding the potential of biotic infestation then leads to a quality result. This means that the possible emergence of disputes and molds in the ETICS is not only possible on the surface of the external plaster, but also under the plaster. It can be said that the building is “healthy” and does not create the potential for negative discussions regarding the harmfulness of biodegradation.
The essence of this case study is that it shows how the underestimation of the importance of diagnostic and technological work in the construction leads to a biotic attack on both external plasters without a photocatalytic coating and plasters with a photocatalytic coating.
In addition to high-quality technological processes in the field of ETICS, it is possible to apply new generation thermal insulation to the facade insulation, such as gray polystyrene, which is thinner and lighter than white expanded polystyrene while maintaining thermal insulation properties and has low thermal conductivity. It is an alternative solution where, with a smaller insulation thickness, we achieves a better value of the heat transfer coefficient.
Other variants include ventilated facades and ventilated tiles. It is always necessary to consider the long-term perspective, the options of the investor, and the set system care and maintenance system.
Reducing the energy performance of buildings is part of a long-term plan for Europe’s transformation into a climatic neutral continent by 2050 [33]. Buildings and their renovations play a key role in achieving the set goals. This is partly because buildings account for up to 40% of energy consumption and up to 36% of greenhouse gases in the EU. ETICS is an integral part of these strategic plans in the context of social and societal change.

Funding

The paper have been supported from the funds of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, with support of the Institutional support 2020–2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data is stored in the author’s archive. The data and data result from more than 20 years of research in the field of residential panel construction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The basis for the evaluation and selection of apartment buildings were localities and apartment buildings that have been continuously monitored by the author from 1998 to the present. These are mainly prefabricated apartment buildings from the point of view of building physics and predictions of their service life to 2030 and beyond. The results have been published by the author on an ongoing basis.
The monitoring included prefab construction systems and mixed construction systems (masonry, prefabricated, square technologies):
  • Locality 1 (city of Ostrava and selected territory): number of buildings: 9.
  • Locality 1 (town Havířov and selected territory): number of buildings: 33.
The area is part of the Ostrava-Karviná region and is an area of 170 km2 (the cities of Ostrava and Havířov, are part of the territory).

Appendix B

In the area of 1 and 2, prefabricated housing constructions were monitored (types T02B-OS and T03B-OS, etc.), and housing that was not equipped with ETICS was monitored. Defects and disorders from acoustics, safety in use, fire safety, and user health protection, as well as thermal technical and static defects and disturbances of the perimeter casing were assessed. For evaluation, the Direct Determined Current Calculation (DDCC) [34] was used, which was originally evolved as an alternative to the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation techniques in the SBRA method (Simulation-Based Relelability Essessment method) [35]. As with this method, histograms, so-called non-parametric divisions, are expressed for DDCC input variable quantities, and the method is not limited to the use of parametric distributions. Alternatively, the evaluation was carried out by histograms, i.e., probability principles. Naturally, the same input data was used for this probability evaluation, i.e., individual evaluations according to risk analysis methodology [36,37]. From individual sources of danger (matrix hazards or risk matrix), histograms were created, and their product was then determined by the resulting histogram representing each of the ranked panel objects. A 95% quantile was selected as the criterion. Histograms of individual sources of danger were compiled for evaluation. Overall, the occurrence of the matrix values was shown as the dependence of the frequency of SV values in relation to the severity of SV for individual sources of danger; these were monitored defects and disorders. The evaluation of the building was then based on the overall histogram. This histogram was the result of multiplying the histogram consisting of the degree of severity by the frequency occurrence of SV values for individual risk sources.
For clarity, the evaluation of histograms expressed the mutual relationship of the same panel components of residential houses in two locations, in Ostrava and Havirov. Through the mutual multiplying of histograms for the structural panel housing system, for example, by type T02B-OS in the Ostrava and Havířov sites, we acquired the resulting histogram with a 95% quantile worth 46 (dimensionless quantity). Substitution was used for acceptable division softness, where the resulting evaluation was replaced by integers. In this case, in the range of 1 ÷ 9.
Similarly, the histograms for the T03B-OS structural housing system in the Ostrava and Havirov localities were multiplied. For this system, we acquired the resulting histogram with 95% quantile worth 37 (dimensionless quantity). For acceptable subtlety, substitution was also used herein, where the resulting evaluation was replaced by integers. In this case, again in the range of 1 ÷ 9 (for selected evaluation of the issue, see Figure A1 and Figure A2). The methodological procedure has been published [38].
It was clear from the evaluation that the defects and disorders of the perimeter casing in terms of technology and statics were comparable in both locations for all represented panel components of residential houses.
Similarly, when obtaining more samples, it is possible to follow the evaluation in the problematics of this article. Therefore, the assumption (Chapter 2) was defined: manifesting biodegradation on the outer surfaces of the ETICS with a photocatalytic coating and without a photocatalytic coating will probably occur on degraded surfaces of greater than 0.50 m2 in other panel components of residential houses, realized in the territory of Ostrava-Karviná region between 1959 and 1990, in comparably the same extent (see Figure A1 and Figure A2).
Currently, the acquisition of samples after the insulation of ETICS is often problematic because it is subject to the approval of the owners of panel apartment buildings. This result corresponds to the expected and expert estimate.
Figure A1. Histogram for the T02B-OS system in Ostrava and Havířov.
Figure A1. Histogram for the T02B-OS system in Ostrava and Havířov.
Sustainability 14 03135 g0a1
Figure A2. Histogram for the T03B-OS system in Ostrava and Havířov.
Figure A2. Histogram for the T03B-OS system in Ostrava and Havířov.
Sustainability 14 03135 g0a2
A suitable methodology for evaluating the degraded buildings can be based, in principle, on the following: Paints and varnishes—Evaluation of Degradation of Coatings—Designation of Quantity and Size of Defects, and of Intensity of Uniform Changes in Appearance, Part 1: General Introduction and Designation System [39]. The Standard is The Czech version of the European Standard EN ISO 4628-1: 2016 [40]. The standards can be applied well to the author’s methodology, which has been published previously [4,41]. The published methodology is a good base for further investigations. Survey and construction technical exploration is not consistent in the Czech Republic, and any professional group that performs the diagnostics and evaluation of a building chooses an evaluation procedure independently.
It should be possible to obtain further results related to photocatalytic coatings, and these can be processed by statistical evaluation and complement the methodology thereafter. At this stage, the sample is very small for evaluation.

References

  1. ČSN 73 2901; Performance of External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS). Office for Technical Standardization, Metrology and State Testing: Prague, Czech Republic, 2005.
  2. ČSN 73 0540-2; Thermal Protection of Buildings-Part 2: Requirements. Office for Technical Standardization, Metrology and State Testing: Prague, Czech Republic, 2011.
  3. Csoknyai, T.; Hrabovszky-Horváth, S.; Georgiev, Z.; Jovanovic-Popovic, M.; Stankovic, B.; Villatoro, O.; Szendrö, G. Building stock characteristics and energy performance of residential buildings in Eastern-European countries. Energy Build. 2016, 132, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kubečková, D. Past and Perspectives of Panel Housing Construction; Inaugural Lecture; VSB-TUO: Ostrava, Czechia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Insulation Reduces Energy Costs by Up to 45%. Available online: https://stavba.tzb-info.cz/izolace-strechy-fasady/128851-zatepleni-snizuje-naklady-na-energie-az-o-45 (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  6. Directive No. 78/2013 Energy Performance of Buildings (CZ). Available online: www.eu.europe.eu (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  7. Council Directive of the European Parliament 2012/27/EU z 25.10.2012, Energy Efficiency 2012. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32012L0027&from=EN (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  8. Recast, E.P.B.D. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union. 2010. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/proposal_for_a_directive_on_energy_efficiency_recast.pdf (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  9. European Commission Directive 2018/844/EU Energy Performance of Buildings. Off. J. Eur. Union 2018. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  10. Legal harmonization of the 2010/31/EU Directive. Available online: https://www.iea.org/policies/1194-legal-harmonization-ofdirective (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  11. Directive No. 264/2020, on the Energy Performance of Buildings 2020. Available online: www.epb.center (accessed on 3 March 2021).
  12. Vaverka, J. Building Thermal Engineering and Building Energy; Brno University of Technology: Brno-Střed, Czech Republic, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dornieden, T.; Gorbushina, A.A.; Krumbein, W.E. Biodecay of cultural heritage as a space/time-related ecological situation-an evaluation of a series of studies. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2000, 46, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krumbein, W.E. Microbial interactions with mineral materials. Biodeterioration 1988, 7, 78–100. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vrbová, M. Thesis for the Dissertation (Report of Presentation); VSB-TUO: Ostrava, Czechia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kukutschová, J.; Doležalová, H. The Report of the Results of the Determination of Biotic Disturbances in Plaster; Nanotechnology Centre, VSB-TUO: Ostrava, Czechia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kubečková, D.; Kučeriková, V. Monitoring Report of Biotic Attack; VSB-TUO: Ostrava, Czechia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunning, H. Scientists Discover a New Type of Photosynthesis. Imperial College London, June 2018. Available online: https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-discover-new-type-of-photosynthesis/ (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  19. Michalak, J.; Czernik, S.; Marcinek, M.; Michałowski, B. Environmental burdens of External Thermal Insulation Systems. Expanded Polystyrene vs. Mineral Wool: Case Study from Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kubečková, D.; Kraus, M.; Šenitková, I.; Vrbová, M. The indoor microclimate of prefabricated buildings for housin: Interaction of environmental and construction measures. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kubba, S. Chapter Seven—Indoor Environmental Quality. In Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 313–316. [Google Scholar]
  22. Healthier Environment with Antibacterial Photocatalytic Nano Coating. Available online: https://stavba.tzb-info.cz/stavebni-chemie/22447-zdravejsi-prostredi-s-antibakterialnim-fotokatalytickym-nano-naterem (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  23. Řehánek, J. Thermal and Energy Properties of Buildings; Grada Publishing: Prague-Holešovice, Czech Republic, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  24. Šála, J. Thermal Protection of Buildings; CEA: Prague, Czech Republic, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Řehánek, J. Thermal Technical Standards—Commentary on Standards (73 0540, 73 0542, 73 0549, 73 0560, 73 0565); Publishing ÚNM: Prague, Czech Republic, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  26. EAD 040083-00-0404; External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS) with Rendering, European Assessment Document. European Organisation for Technical Assessment: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
  27. ETAG 0004 European Technical Approval Guideline. Available online: https://www.eota.eu/etags-archive (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  28. Advanced Materials, ltd. Report, 2020. Available online: https://www.idtechex.com/en/reports/advanced-materials/77 (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  29. Kubečková, D.; Vrbová, M. Historical Development of Thermal Protection of Prefab Residential Housing and Its Future, an Example of the Czech Republic. Energies 2021, 14, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tywoniak, J. Construction-Energy Concepts of Buildings in Social Contexts. Available online: http://tzb-info.cz/nizkoenergetickestavby.cz (accessed on 30 January 2022).
  31. Construction and Preparation. Available online: https://www.czb.cz/tag/stavba-a-priprava/ (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  32. Council Directive 93/76/EHS/1993, Oxydo-limiting Emissions of Carbon through Energy Efficiency 1993. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A31993L0076 (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  33. Green New Deal. 2021. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_New_Deal (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  34. Janas, P. Statistical dependence of input variables in the PDPV (POPV) methods. Trans. VSB-TUO. Civ. Eng. Ser. 2012, 12, 243–252. [Google Scholar]
  35. Marek, P. Probabilisttic Assessment of Structures Using Monte Carlo Simulation; Academy of Science of the Czech Republic: Prague, Czech Republic, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kubečka, K. Construction risks—Distribution of risks in the construction process and the impact on damage and defects of buildings. In Technical Sheets, Cideas; Centre for Integrated Design of Advanced Structures: Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tichý, M. Risk control, analysis and management. In Monography, 1st ed.; C.H. Beck: Nové Město, Czech Republic, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kubečková, D. Defects and Failures of Panel Housing Construction, Methodology of Their Evaluation; VSB-TUO: Ostrava, Czechia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  39. ČSN EN ISO 4628-1: 2016; Paints and Varnishes—Evaluation of Degradation of Coatings—Designation of Quantity and Size of Defects, and of Intensity of Uniform Changes in Appearance, Part 1: General Introduction and Designation System. The International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  40. Idt. ISO 4628-1: 2016; The Standard IS The Czech Version of the European Standard EN ISO-1: 2016. The International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  41. Kubečková, D. Diagnostics are an Integral Part of the Renovation of Prefabricated Cladding of Buildings. In Proceedings of the 1st International Virtual Conference ARSA, Žilina, Slovakia, 3–7 December 2012; pp. 1822–1888. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Evaluation scheme.
Figure 1. Evaluation scheme.
Sustainability 14 03135 g001
Figure 2. Apartment building number 1 with photocatalytic coating; surface biodegradation is greater than 0.50 m2.
Figure 2. Apartment building number 1 with photocatalytic coating; surface biodegradation is greater than 0.50 m2.
Sustainability 14 03135 g002
Figure 3. Apartment building no. 2 without a photocatalytic coating; surface-wide biodegradation greater than 0.50 m2.
Figure 3. Apartment building no. 2 without a photocatalytic coating; surface-wide biodegradation greater than 0.50 m2.
Sustainability 14 03135 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic monitoring: (a) Layer of protective photocatalytic coating; (b) Side section through paint.
Figure 4. Microscopic monitoring: (a) Layer of protective photocatalytic coating; (b) Side section through paint.
Sustainability 14 03135 g004
Figure 5. View of coating at high magnification, 100,000×, shows the nanostructural nature of the surface layer.
Figure 5. View of coating at high magnification, 100,000×, shows the nanostructural nature of the surface layer.
Sustainability 14 03135 g005
Figure 6. Microorganisms found: (a) Presence of Chroococcidiopsis cyanobacteria; (b) Colonial type Chlorophyccae algae.
Figure 6. Microorganisms found: (a) Presence of Chroococcidiopsis cyanobacteria; (b) Colonial type Chlorophyccae algae.
Sustainability 14 03135 g006
Figure 7. Technology of execution of external plasters: (a) Inhomogeneous structure of the nanopainter; (b) External plaster without structural anomalies (screening by Digimicroscope camera).
Figure 7. Technology of execution of external plasters: (a) Inhomogeneous structure of the nanopainter; (b) External plaster without structural anomalies (screening by Digimicroscope camera).
Sustainability 14 03135 g007
Table 1. Evaluation of apartment buildings.
Table 1. Evaluation of apartment buildings.
Number of HousesPerimeter CladdingPhotocatalytic Coating
1
Number of samples: 3
Facade material solution:
Gas silicate block panel th. 300 mm + 150 mm ETICS
Yes
2
Number of samples: 3
Facade material solution:
Reinforced concrete panel th. 300 mm + 150 mm ETICS
No
Table 2. Evaluation of field research, diagnostics, and laboratory analysis.
Table 2. Evaluation of field research, diagnostics, and laboratory analysis.
Locality Number of Buildings (Total)Number of Buildings with Photocatalytic CoatingNumber of Samples from 1 BuildingsIngrowth of ETICS MicroorganismsNumber of Positive Samples: MicroorganismGenus
Ostrava913Yes3Chlorophycae
Alternaria
Aspergillus
Cladodosporium spores
Havířov *
Ostrava
33
9
0
0
0
3
Yes
Yes
3Chlorophycae
Alternaria
Aspergillus
Note: * Link to long-term monitored objects—see Appendix A.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubečková, D. The Quality of ETICS in the Context of Energy and Social Changes (Case Study). Sustainability 2022, 14, 3135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063135

AMA Style

Kubečková D. The Quality of ETICS in the Context of Energy and Social Changes (Case Study). Sustainability. 2022; 14(6):3135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubečková, Darja. 2022. "The Quality of ETICS in the Context of Energy and Social Changes (Case Study)" Sustainability 14, no. 6: 3135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop