Intellectual Structure in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2000 to 2022: A Review Based on Text Mining Approach
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Design
2.1. Tools and Technology
2.1.1. CiteSpace
2.1.2. Latent Dirichlet Allocation
2.2. Data Source
3. Bibliometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace
3.1. Co-Occurring Terms and Co-Occurring Keywords Analysis
3.2. Cooperation Analysis of Authors, Institutions, and Countries
4. Cited References Analysis
4.1. Co-Cited Reference Analysis
4.2. Co-Cited Author Analysis
4.3. Co-Cited Journal Analysis
5. Topics Evolution
6. Conclusions and Future Work
6.1. Conclusions
6.2. Managerial Implication
6.3. Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lawrence, J.M.; Hossain, N.U.I.; Jaradat, R.; Hamilton, M. Leveraging a Bayesian network approach to model and analyze supplier vulnerability to severe weather risk: A case study of the US pharmaceutical supply chain following Hurricane Maria. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 49, 101607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, O.; Musa, S.N. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 133, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.K.; Srivastava, P.R.; Kumar, A.; Jindal, A.; Gupta, S. Supply chain vulnerability assessment for manufacturing industry. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 6, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, A.S. Strategies to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on supply chain disruptions: A multiple case analysis of buyers and distributors. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 3, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Xie, H.; Yu, G.; Liu, M. Antecedents and consequences of supply chain risk management capabilities: An investigation in the post-coronavirus crisis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 1573–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pournader, M.; Kach, A.; Talluri, S. A review of the existing and emerging topics in the supply chain risk management literature. Decis. Sci. 2020, 51, 867–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colicchia, C.; Strozzi, F. Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag. 2012, 17, 403–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdi, F.; Ghorbel, A.; Masmoudi, F.; Dupont, L. Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: Literature review. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 29, 763–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, W.; Zheng, T.; Yildiz, H.; Talluri, S. Supply chain risk management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015, 53, 5031–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahesh, M.B.; Tabarsa, G.; Zandieh, M.; Hamidizadeh, M. Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis. Technol. Soc. 2020, 63, 101399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dionisio, M. The evolution of social entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric analysis. Soc. Enterp. J. 2019, 15, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, F.A.; Santos, S.P. Two decades on the MACBETH approach: A bibliometric analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 296, 901–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linnenluecke, M.K.; Marrone, M.; Singh, A.K. Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust. J. Manag. 2020, 45, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Lei, L. A bibliometric analysis of topic modelling studies (2000–2017). J. Inf. Sci. 2021, 47, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, J.M.; Sousa, A.; Calçada, E.; Oliveira, J. A citation and co-citation bibliometric analysis of omnichannel marketing research. Manag. Rev. Q. 2021, 72, 1017–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hota, P.K.; Subramanian, B.; Narayanamurthy, G. Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 166, 89–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanra, S.; Dhir, A.; Kaur, P.; Mäntymäki, M. Bibliometric analysis and literature review of ecotourism: Toward sustainable development. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 37, 100777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Yang, M.M.; Wang, Z.; Michelson, G. Trends in the dynamic evolution of corporate social responsibility and leadership: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 1, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behrend, J.; Eulerich, M. The evolution of internal audit research: A bibliometric analysis of published documents (1926–2016). Account. Hist. Rev. 2019, 29, 103–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albort-Morant, G.; Leal-Rodríguez, A.L.; Fernández-Rodríguez, V.; Ariza-Montes, A. Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2018, 24, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Z. Risk management in sustainable supply chain: A knowledge map towards intellectual structure, logic diagram, and conceptual model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 66041–66067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, S.; Zhang, X.; Feng, L.; Yang, W. Disruption risks in supply chain management: A literature review based on bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 3508–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallinger, P. Analyzing the intellectual structure of the Knowledge base on managing for sustainability, 1982–2019: A meta-analysis. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1493–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C. Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2017, 2, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; Jordan, M.I. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022. [Google Scholar]
- Köseoglu, M.A.; Sehitoglu, Y.; Craft, J. Academic foundations of hospitality management research with an emerging country focus: A citation and co-citation analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 45, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilkington, A.; Meredith, J. The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. J. Oper. Manag. 2009, 27, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, L.; Wang, Y.; Shi, B.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Yan, J. Microsoft concept graph: Mining semantic concepts for short text understanding. Data Intell. 2019, 1, 238–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Journal | Quantity | Proportion |
---|---|---|
International Journal of Production Economics | 423 | 23.31% |
International Journal of Production Research | 414 | 22.72% |
European Journal of Operational Research | 229 | 12.57% |
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal | 162 | 8.90% |
Production and Operations Management | 145 | 7.96% |
International Journal of Logistics Management | 107 | 5.87% |
Omega | 83 | 4.56% |
Journal of Operations Management | 67 | 3.68% |
Decision Sciences | 55 | 3.02% |
Journal of the Operational Research Society | 49 | 2.69% |
Management Science | 33 | 1.81% |
Planning and Control | 22 | 1.21% |
Interfaces | 11 | 0.60% |
Operations Research | 7 | 0.38% |
Harvard Business Review | 5 | 0.27% |
California Management Review | 5 | 0.27% |
MIT Sloan Management Review | 5 | 0.27% |
Cluster | Size | Silhouette | Label (LLR) | Label (LSI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
#0 | 61 | 0.973 | supply chain (86.02, 1.0 × 10−4); empirical investigation (45.94, 1.0 × 10−4); financial flow (39.61, 1.0 × 10−4); financial supply chain management (39.61, 1.0 × 10−4); dominant retailer (37.51, 1.0 × 10−4); | supply chain; inventory risk; advance-purchase discount contracts; allocation; lead time variability; |
#1 | 16 | 0.990 | supply chain resilience (108.17, 1.0 × 10−4); risk propagation (46.09, 1.0 × 10−4); network characteristics (46.09, 1.0 × 10−4); artificial intelligence (40.91, 1.0 × 10−4); agriculture supply chain perspective (40.91, 1.0 × 10−4); | supply chain resilience; adaptive cycle approach; insurance; role; behavioral experiment; |
#2 | 15 | 0.956 | behavioral investigation (74.02, 1.0 × 10−4); operations management (69, 1.0 × 10−4); supply chain risk management (69, 1.0 × 10−4); supply chain integration (62.99, 1.0 × 10−4); empirical analysis (54.01, 1.0 × 10−4); | behavioral investigation; supply chain; transshipments; literature; review; |
#3 | 12 | 0.995 | supply chain management (169.31, 1.0 × 10−4); literature review (68.84, 1.0 × 10−4); COVID−19 outbreak (59.52, 1.0 × 10−4); blockchain adoption (54.88, 1.0 × 10−4); quality inspection v (45.63, 1.0 × 10−4); | supply chain management; theoretic model; blockchain; smart contracts; game; |
#4 | 12 | 0.944 | ripple effect (93.42, 1.0 × 10−4); systematic literature review (78.24, 1.0 × 10−4); conceptual framework (47.56, 1.0 × 10−4); synchromodal freight transport (43.45, 1.0 × 10−4); system dynamics approach (43.45, 1.0 × 10−4); | supply risk; systematic literature review; digging; price risks; agent-based simulation study; |
#5 | 12 | 0.986 | demand uncertainty (153.08, 1.0 × 10−4); sourcing strategies (68.16, 1.0 × 10−4); agglomeration economies (45.19, 1.0 × 10−4); retail competition (45.19, 1.0 × 10−4); capacity risk (45.19, 1.0 × 10−4); | demand uncertainty; coordination; consumer return; supply chain; air shipment; |
#6 | 12 | 0.957 | risk management (129.92, 1.0 × 10−4); supply network (75.97, 1.0 × 10−4); exploratory study (47.14, 1.0 × 10−4); automotive supply chain (47.14, 1.0 × 10−4); risk assessment (37.63, 1.0 × 10−4); | risk management; closed loop supply chain; kanban system; risk assessment; strategic cooperation; |
#7 | 7 | 0.997 | assembly system (41.22, 1.0 × 10−4); channel coordination (32.83, 1.0 × 10−4); advance demand information (32.83, 1.0 × 10−4); replenishment strategies (32.83, 1.0 × 10−4); distribution system (32.83, 1.0 × 10−4); | assembly system; hybrid push-pull contract; delivery quantity; processing time; facing uncertain demand; |
#8 | 6 | 0.997 | integrative supply chain strategy (12.44, 1.0 × 10−4); indirect relationship (12.44, 1.0 × 10−4); financial performance (12.44, 1.0 × 10−4); customer service (12.44, 1.0 × 10−4); supply chain (0.67, 1.0 × 10−4); | integrative supply chain strategy; customer service; financial performance: indirect relationships; supply chain; |
#9 | 6 | 0.993 | deteriorating item (139.32, 1.0 × 10−4); expiration date (47.15, 1.0 × 10−4); two-level trade credit financing (26.75, 1.0 × 10−4); lot size (26.75, 1.0 × 10−4); partial trade credit (20.01, 1.0 × 10−4); | deteriorating items; optimal credit period; supply chain; cycle time; partial trade credit; |
Term | Centrality |
---|---|
supply chain | 0.18 |
supply chain resilience | 0.17 |
demand uncertainty | 0.16 |
risk management | 0.14 |
supply chain management | 0.13 |
disruption risks | 0.13 |
empirical analysis | 0.11 |
ripple effect | 0.1 |
supply chain disruptions | 0.09 |
Freq | Centrality | Keyword | Cluster ID |
---|---|---|---|
193 | 0.18 | supply chain | #0 |
31 | 0.13 | supply chain resilience | #2 |
27 | 0.13 | supply chain risk management | #0 |
21 | 0.13 | disruption risk | #6 |
18 | 0.12 | demand uncertainty | #4 |
15 | 0.12 | supply chain disruption | #6 |
14 | 0.12 | systematic literature review | #0 |
12 | 0.11 | supply disruption | #6 |
12 | 0.11 | ripple effect | #5 |
12 | 0.11 | empirical analysis | #4 |
9 | 0.10 | COVID-19 pandemic | #0 |
8 | 0.10 | supply network | #4 |
Freq | Pagerank | Author | ClusterID |
---|---|---|---|
30 | 3.19 | Choi, Tsan-Ming | #0 |
23 | 1.93 | Ivanov, Dmitry | #2 |
16 | 1.95 | Cheng, T. C. Edwin | #0 |
12 | 1.93 | Dolgui, Alexandre | #2 |
11 | 1.92 | Blackhurst, Jennifer | #1 |
8 | 1.65 | Chernonog, Tatyana | #4 |
8 | 1.65 | Avinadav, Tal | #4 |
7 | 1.92 | Gunasekaran, Angappa | #5 |
7 | 1.65 | Wagner, Stephan M. | #6 |
6 | 1.92 | Blome, Constantin | #1 |
6 | 1.69 | Talluri, Srinivas | #2 |
6 | 1.65 | Azadegan, Arash | #1 |
Freq | PageRank | Institution |
---|---|---|
73 | 5.17 | Hong Kong Polytech University |
30 | 3.12 | Michigan State University |
25 | 2.89 | Penn State University |
25 | 2.60 | Arizona State University |
23 | 3.32 | City Univ Hong Kong |
23 | 2.07 | Berlin Sch Econ and Law |
18 | 1.01 | Univ Sci and Technol China |
16 | 2.07 | Univ Texas Dallas |
16 | 3.05 | Chinese Univ Hong Kong |
15 | 1.01 | Univ Tehran |
14 | 1.18 | Univ Elect Sci and Technol China |
13 | 2.55 | South China Univ Technol |
13 | 1.18 | Ohio State Univ |
Freq | Centrality | Country |
---|---|---|
673 | 0.67 | USA |
390 | 0.50 | PEOPLES R CHINA |
175 | 0.58 | ENGLAND |
137 | 0.49 | GERMANY |
109 | 0.41 | CANADA |
86 | 0.43 | FRANCE |
86 | 0.41 | INDIA |
75 | 0.36 | AUSTRALIA |
60 | 0.35 | ITALY |
56 | 0.35 | TAIWAN |
39 | 0.36 | SWITZERLAND |
37 | 0.33 | NETHERLANDS |
Freq | Burst | Author | Year | Journal |
---|---|---|---|---|
100 | 16.17 | William Ho, et al. | 2015 | International Journal of Production Research |
81 | 35.54 | Christopher S. Tang | 2006 | International Journal of Production Economics |
75 | 9.20 | Iris Heckmann, et al. | 2015 | Omega |
72 | 11.70 | Ou Tang, S.Nurmaya Musa | 2011 | International Journal of Production Economics |
69 | 11.02 | Saurabh Ambulkar, et al. | 2015 | Journal of International Management |
68 | 11.52 | ManMohan S. Sodhi, et al. | 2012 | Production and Operations Management |
66 | 8.70 | Dmitry Ivanov, et al. | 2014 | International Journal of Production Research |
63 | 11.73 | Lawrence V. Snyder, et al. | 2016 | IIE Transactions |
63 | 29.30 | Paul R. Kleindorfer, Germaine H. Saad | 2005 | Production and Operations Management |
59 | 6.94 | Benjamin R. Tukamuhabwa, et al. | 2015 | International Journal of Production Research |
59 | 25.61 | Brian Tomlin | 2006 | Mangement Science |
56 | 11.92 | Chopra, Sunil, Sodhi, Manmohan S. | 2014 | MIT Sloan Management Review |
Cluster | Size | Silhouette | Label (LLR) | The Major Citing Article |
---|---|---|---|---|
#0 | 117 | 0.870 | Empirical study | Ghadge, A (2012) Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. |
#1 | 97 | 0.919 | Disruption risk | Dolgui, A (2020) Reconfigurable supply chain: the x-network. |
#2 | 78 | 0.973 | Supply chain management | Tang, CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. |
#3 | 69 | 0.935 | Supply chain resilience | Ali, A (2017) Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. |
#4 | 66 | 0.924 | COVID-19 pandemic | Rozhkov, M (2022) Adapting supply chain operations in anticipation of and during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
#5 | 37 | 0.960 | Supply chain network design | Ho, W (2015) Supply chain risk management: a literature review. |
#6 | 36 | 0.997 | Trade credit | Wang, J (2020) Operations-finance interface in risk management: research evolution and opportunities. |
#7 | 36 | 0.985 | Risk-averse retailer | Yang, DQ (2009) Pricing, service level and lot size decisions of a supply chain with risk-averse retailers: implications to practitioners. |
#8 | 34 | 0.977 | Risk aversion | Merzifonluoglu, Y (2015) Impact of risk aversion and backup supplier on sourcing decisions of a firm. |
#9 | 34 | 0.979 | Dynamic supply risk management | Gao, L (2015) Long-term contracting: the role of private information in dynamic supply risk management. |
Freq | Year | Author | Cluster |
---|---|---|---|
347 | 2009 | Tang CS | Supply chain risk management |
322 | 2004 | Chopra S | Supply chain risk management |
314 | 2002 | Cachon GP | Newsvendor problem |
278 | 2000 | Lee HL | Closed-loop supply chain |
276 | 2005 | Christopher M | Supply chain risk management |
243 | 2005 | Kleindorfer PR | Supply chain risk management |
241 | 2005 | Hendricks KB | Supply chain risk management |
239 | 2009 | Tomlin B | Supply chain risk management |
215 | 2008 | Sheffi Y | Supply chain resilience |
199 | 2008 | Juttner U | Supply chain risk management |
195 | 2009 | Wagner SM | Supply chain risk management |
178 | 2004 | Zsidisin GA | Supply chain risk management |
156 | 2009 | Craighead CW | Supply chain risk management |
Freq | Centrality | Journal |
---|---|---|
1207 | 0.22 | International Journal of Production Economics |
1149 | 0.16 | Management Science |
1105 | 0.13 | European Journal of Operational Research |
922 | 0.12 | Production and Operations Management |
869 | 0.12 | International Journal of Production Research |
715 | 0.1 | Journal of Operations Management |
663 | 0.08 | Omega-International Journal of Management Science |
653 | 0.05 | Operations Research |
570 | 0.03 | Supply Chain Management-An International Journal |
499 | 0.03 | Decision Sciences |
470 | 0.02 | M&SOM-Manufacturing & Service Operations Management |
440 | 0.02 | International Journal of Operations & Production Management |
432 | 0.01 | Harvard Business Review |
426 | 0.01 | International Journal of Logistics Management |
421 | 0.01 | Journal of Supply Chain Management |
Topic | Importance Degree | Words | Conceptualization |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.781 | research operations supply price firm | Perspectives on risk management in supply chains |
2 | 0.210 | suppliers model manufacturers’ procurement trust | How to mitigate supplier risk in the supply chain |
3 | 0.208 | risks disruption resilience operational impact | Disruption risks in supply chains |
4 | 0.110 | research mitigation time project cycle | Supply chain risk mitigation |
5 | 0.352 | systems control mismanaging models | Information modeling, control systems |
6 | 1.959 | supply decision research security information | Information systems research about risk |
7 | 1.107 | engineering China research performance factors | Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling |
8 | 0.587 | science university engineering food design | Design and build the resilient supply chain |
9 | 0.651 | approach contract framework performance probability | Global supply chain risks management |
10 | 0.021 | financial approach performance scheduling facility | Quantitative and qualitative criterion of SCRM |
11 | 2.364 | chain engineering management results firms | Purchasing and supply chain management: analysis, strategy, planning and practice |
12 | 2.188 | management analysis industrial uncertainty optimal | Managing disruption risks in supply chains |
13 | 0.841 | coordination contract contracts price cost | Supply chain coordination with contracts |
14 | 1.353 | study strategy science products performance | Corporate decision, strategy, and qualitative of supply chain risk |
15 | 0.371 | industry level continuity issues resource | Resource flexibility and continuity management |
16 | 0.154 | RFID simulation business levels press | RFID with SCRM |
17 | 0.102 | China sustainability option profit improve | Corporate sustainability and economic foundations |
18 | 0.256 | information production press differentiation commitment | Information, ERP software, and forecast |
19 | 4.275 | risks economics model retailer case | Supply chain design and analysis, model and method |
20 | 3.789 | science research operations demand issue | Planning and operational design issue |
21 | 3.586 | operations supply risk supplier inventory | Operations supply risk and supplier inventory |
22 | 0.127 | product buyer supplier quality costs | Information, contracting, and quality costs |
23 | 0.275 | vendor transport economic stock outsourcing | Vendor, retailer, and consumer |
24 | 1.400 | logistics international research distribution physical | Quantitative models |
25 | 0.369 | trade buyer manager retailer time | Bullwhip effect and decision-making |
Topic | 2000 | 2001 | …… | 2021 | 2022 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.015672 | 0.040315 | …… | 0.104272 | 0.069218 |
2 | 0.001184 | 0.000537 | …… | 0.000529 | 0.003918 |
3 | 0.001173 | 0.003086 | …… | 0.045352 | 0.036030 |
4 | 0.000619 | 0.000281 | …… | 0.000136 | 0.037414 |
5 | 0.001986 | 0.205277 | …… | 0.001506 | 0.000327 |
6 | 0.084305 | 0.04077 | …… | 0.038049 | 0.058839 |
7 | 0.006238 | 0.002827 | …… | 0.059986 | 0.080757 |
8 | 0.003306 | 0.004053 | …… | 0.036606 | 0.023907 |
9 | 0.003669 | 0.045093 | …… | 0.017649 | 0.002938 |
10 | 0.000116 | 0.000527 | …… | 0.000131 | 0.000191 |
11 | 0.024598 | 0.067353 | …… | 0.043234 | 0.051823 |
12 | 0.017966 | 0.033691 | …… | 0.063474 | 0.08921 |
13 | 0.010378 | 0.007259 | …… | 0.026239 | 0.021982 |
14 | 0.018898 | 0.006012 | …… | 0.034462 | 0.058876 |
15 | 0.002092 | 0.006058 | …… | 0.000540 | 0.002169 |
16 | 0.000866 | 0.000392 | …… | 0.000461 | 0.000143 |
17 | 0.000576 | 0.000261 | …… | 0.040573 | 0.002423 |
18 | 0.00144 | 0.000653 | …… | 0.000468 | 0.001509 |
19 | 0.046635 | 0.268946 | …… | 0.152416 | 0.131726 |
20 | 0.038262 | 0.155298 | …… | 0.089697 | 0.084718 |
21 | 0.059659 | 0.070473 | …… | 0.105356 | 0.138902 |
22 | 0.64321 | 0.00288 | …… | 0.000820 | 0.000105 |
23 | 0.00155 | 0.02114 | …… | 0.005951 | 0.002531 |
24 | 0.013525 | 0.01635 | …… | 0.118113 | 0.094242 |
25 | 0.002078 | 0.000942 | …… | 0.014922 | 0.006717 |
Topic | 2000–2006/stage 1 | 2007–2011/stage 2 | 2012–2016/stage 3 | 2017–2022/stage 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | economic policies theory provide relationship | stock companies factor critical related | supply science retailer models decisions | operational practice practices selection enterprise |
2 | purchasing variety determine cross-training decisions | global company development distribution physical | physical model risk knowledge disruption | chain research supply paper production |
3 | set modeling risks industrial sharing | contract manufacturer procurement strategies | model industry technology China capacity | risk research supplier market contract |
4 | company effective flexibility structure stochastic | chain risk science economics performance | procurement prices examine failure purchasing | financial system case multiple simulation |
5 | engineering analysis environmental variety market | retailer incentives terms effort mission | firm price trust contract focus | supply chain risks disruption service |
6 | products state lead strategy allocation | research demand planning supply issues | China policy outsourcing selection industrial | model planning networks mis product |
7 | chain retailer systems analyze approaches | paper model costs market press | order analysis approach manufacturer decision | channel service European sharing items |
8 | control Sloan mis rev political | operations information management capacity systems | engineering transport contract city vendor | product time decision stochastic capacity |
9 | advertising product manufacturing yield | differentiation forecast delayed demand change | price quality networks parts safety | trade managing sustainability approaches culture |
10 | manufacturer efficient output liabilities practices | supply management supplier results risks | systems supply state develop mis | operations international demand economics performance |
11 | operations information demand paper design | operations case product retailer products | simulation practices service levels RFID | inventory mis capability robust parts |
12 | product supplier costs failure result | production decisions risk increasing level | study distribution manufacturers external managers | supply China quality price contracts |
13 | ERP advance develop impact distribution | markets wholesale purchase implementation | inventory service environmental reduce | science model supplier retailer uncertainty |
14 | buyer quality appraisal activity expected | engineering price firms expected environment | operations risk research supplier economics | logistics risks relationship price contract |
15 | supply research science risk management | international control method theory data | supply chain management international suppliers | analysis logistics technology factors control |
16 | uncertainty optimal data opportunities policy | engineering decision responsiveness base component | chain risks product case market | security sharing container transportation performance |
17 | systems solution work influence theoretical | supplier contracts inventory coordination quantity | security companies fashion supplies vaccine | management cost results network process |
18 | capacity problem robust India distribution | robust online uncertain task robustness | logistics inventory information university uncertainty | research literature manufacturer strategies |
19 | planning case criteria model times | industry continuity pricing lead equity | engineering demand study strategies review | science distribution engineering physical order |
20 | performance process operational model task | change service potential selection logistics | performance contracts profit programming time | engineering industrial strategy systems |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, S. Intellectual Structure in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2000 to 2022: A Review Based on Text Mining Approach. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316245
Liu X, Zhou Y, Gao S. Intellectual Structure in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2000 to 2022: A Review Based on Text Mining Approach. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316245
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Xiaoyang, Yuanyuan Zhou, and Song Gao. 2022. "Intellectual Structure in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2000 to 2022: A Review Based on Text Mining Approach" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316245
APA StyleLiu, X., Zhou, Y., & Gao, S. (2022). Intellectual Structure in Supply Chain Risk Management from 2000 to 2022: A Review Based on Text Mining Approach. Sustainability, 14(23), 16245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316245