Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Parking Lots Located along Main Roads in Terms of Cargo Truck Requirements: A Case Study of Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Indoor Environment on Occupant Air Comfort and Productivity in Office Buildings: A Response Surface Analysis Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption of Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings in Cold and Arid Regions of Northwest China

1
School of New Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Department of Architecture Engineering, Gansu Vocational College of Architecture, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 15721; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315721
Submission received: 26 September 2022 / Revised: 1 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Green Building)

Abstract

:
There are many factors influencing the energy consumption of buildings in complex working conditions. In order to study the factors influencing the energy consumption of residential buildings with nearly zero energy in cold and arid regions of northwest China, factors such as the roof heat transfer coefficient (KR), exterior wall heat transfer coefficient (KE), ground heat transfer coefficient (KG), exterior window heat transfer coefficient (KEW), north window wall ratio (WWRN), south window wall ratio (WWRS), east west window wall ratio (WWRWE), building orientation (BO), and ventilation times (VT) are taken as the influencing factors in this paper. Using the orthogonal test, 135 building energy consumption calculation models were built in DeST, and the influence of 9 factors on building energy consumption in 5 types of regions (severe cold region A (1A), severe cold region B (1B), severe cold region C (1C), cold region A (2A), and cold region B (2B)) were analyzed. The conclusions are as follows: in the process of realizing nearly zero energy of residential buildings in the cold and arid regions of northwest China, the KR, KE, KG, KEW, WWRN, WWEWE should be reduced as much as possible in the five regions. The 1A,1B,1C regions should increase WWEWE and VT, with BO of about 15° east of due north and VT of about 5, 8, and 10 times per hour, respectively. The WWES, BO and VT for the 2A region should be set at round 0.45, north-south, and about 10 times per hour, respectively. For the 2B region, WWES should be set at around 0.45, BO around 15° east of due north, and VT as low as possible within the scope of the ‘technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings’.

1. Introduction

The energy consumed by the construction industry accounts for about 36% of the global total energy consumption, and building energy consumption will continue to increase in the future [1,2,3]. However, a large amount of energy consumption of buildings is bound to bring about a large amount of carbon emissions, resulting in serious environmental problems. Reducing building energy consumption is a problem that must be considered. From the point of view of the factors affecting the building energy consumption, the method to reduce the building energy consumption appears to be feasible.
There are many factors influencing building energy consumption. Scholars mainly study the influence of building envelope, meteorological factors, window wall ratio, natural and social environment factors, the building itself, and other factors [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Fatima Harkouss et al. took energy consumption demand as the starting point and studied the optimal envelope structure and the optimal window wall ratio in 25 climate zones through optimization algorithm [12]. De Masi Rosa Francesca et al. studied energy and environment in Naples, Munich, Paris, and analyzed the sensitivity of building materials in these three areas [13]. Rabani Mehrdad et al. studied windowing, envelope structure, shading device, and other factors through a new optimization method [14]. Gianluca Pappaccog Li et al. analyzed the sensitivity of urban climate conditions and building energy consumption to the parameters of urban materials and building environment, and obtained the biggest influencing factors of indoor predetermined temperature [15]. Bingwen Zhao et al. took a public building in China as the research object and established a benchmark model by using EnergyPlus to analyze the influence of main thermal performance of building envelope on energy consumption in different climate regions, and obtained the order of factors affecting building energy consumption in different regions [16]. Junsheng Hu et al. took Beijing as an example to study the influence of different thermal physical envelope structures on building energy consumption, and obtained the order of influencing factors of public building energy consumption [17].
In 1976 Danish scientists came up with the concept of “zero energy building” while studying solar energy for winter heating. In recent years, domestic and foreign scholars’ research on nearly zero energy buildings has developed rapidly, and the relevant research mainly focuses on the following aspects: (1) Feasibility research: a feasibility study is mainly based on the local legislation, geography and climate, technology and economic factors, using the net present value (NPC), payback period and operating costs and other economic parameters to test the cost effectiveness of the project, analyze the feasibility of zero energy building in the local [18,19,20,21]. (2) Envelope structure: The research on the envelope structure mainly focuses on two aspects: 1) to transform the envelope structure of the existing building; 2) to put forward suggestions on the selection of the envelope structure of the new building through the research on the thermal parameters of the building envelope [12,13,14]. (3) Research on multi-objective optimization: multi objective optimization studies of near-zero energy buildings mainly focus on the thermal parameters of the envelope, the windowing/wall ratio, the capacity of the photovoltaic power generation system, wind power generation system and other energy supply systems as optimization parameters, and the system cost, energy production, carbon dioxide emissions, indoor thermal comfort as objective functions. In general, the thermal parameters, heating/cooling temperature and energy consumption indexes of the envelope structure stipulated in the existing standards are taken as the constraints for multi-objective optimization [22,23,24,25].
Although the influencing factors of building energy consumption have been studied, they ignore the premise of nearly zero energy consumption in terms of factors affecting building energy consumption in the cold and arid regions of northwest China. As a result, the research on the influencing factors of nearly zero energy residential building energy consumption in the cold and arid areas of northwest China is still limited. The relationship between the influencing factors and the building energy consumption cannot be accurately predicted in the design stage of the nearly zero energy building, which leads to the excessive use of technology and energy input in the design process of the nearly zero energy building, resulting in a large amount of energy waste. In addition, as the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China issued the Technical Standard for Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (GB/T 51350-2019) in 2019, the development of nearly zero energy buildings has unique advantages in the cold and arid northwest of China, which is rich in renewable energy. Therefore, it is urgent to study the influencing factors of energy consumption of residential buildings with nearly zero energy consumption in such regions.
This paper identifies the specific effects of nine factors on heating energy consumption, cooling energy consumption and annual total energy consumption of five types of nearly zero energy consumption buildings in the cold and arid regions of northwest China are studied, and the measures that should be taken to reduce heating energy consumption, cooling energy consumption and annual total energy consumption are clarified. This paper aims to study how nine factors affect the energy consumption of five types of buildings in the cold and dry regions of northwest China. This paper also obtained the specific ways of nine influencing factors on the building energy consumption through orthogonal test and DeST. North-west China has abundant renewable energy sources and has begun the development of nearly zero energy consumption buildings. Based on research into the nine factors, we can better understand the status of renewable energy development in northwest China. We aimed to improve near zero energy consumption in the course of the architectural design process. Finally, we found that abuse of products and overuse of technology and energy input is a common phenomenon, which has important theoretical significance and application value for the promotion and application of near-zero energy consumption buildings in cold and dry land, and put forward suggestions for the realization of nearly zero energy buildings in northwest China.

2. Materials and Methods

In order to study the factors influencing the energy consumption of residential buildings with nearly zero energy consumption in cold and arid areas of northwest China, the roof heat transfer coefficient (KR), exterior wall heat transfer coefficient (KE), ground heat transfer coefficient (KG), exterior window heat transfer coefficient (KEW), north window wall ratio (WWRN), south window wall ratio (WWRS), east west window wall ratio (WWRWE), building orientation (BO) and ventilation times (VT) are taken as the influencing factors. An orthogonal test is designed and building energy consumption simulation software DeST was used to obtain the energy consumption of five typical residential buildings in cold and arid regions of northwest China under the influence of nine factors.

2.1. Typical Buildings

Located in the inland of northwest China, the cold and arid regions of Northwest China cover a vast area, accounting for 31.7% of China’s land area. Winter is cold and dry; according to the geographical location, the average temperature of the coldest month is about −5 °C to −15 °C, most areas belong to the central heating area. According to the Chinese standard GB 50176-2016 Code for Thermal Design of Civil Buildings, the main thermal design areas in Northwest China belong to severe cold region A (1A), severe cold region B (1B), severe cold region C (1C), cold region A (2A) and cold region B (2B). For these five climate regions, Gangca (belongs to 1A), Altay (belongs to 1B), Jiuquan (belongs to 1C), Yinchuan (belongs to 2A) and Xi’an (belongs to 2B) are taken as the typical regions in this paper. The general situation of typical buildings in these five typical regions is shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows the structure of exterior wall, roof, and floor.

2.2. Orthogonal Test Design

In China’s national standards, the comprehensive value of building energy consumption is less than or equal to 55 kWh/(m2·a), the technical parameters of nearly zero energy residential buildings are specified as Table 3 and Table 4.
In order to study the influence of multiple factors on building energy consumption, an orthogonal test method was adopted. The orthogonal test method is a design method to study multi-factors and multi-levels. Compared with a comprehensive test, the orthogonal test can reduce the number of tests, and it represents a high efficiency, rapid and economic experimental design method. In this study, KR, KE, KG, KEW, WWRN, WWRS, WWRWE, BO, and VT are used as influencing factors, and orthogonal factor table and orthogonal factor level table are designed to study their influence on building energy consumption.
The level of influencing factors is based on the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings (GB/T 51350-2019) and general code for energy efficiency and renewable energy application in buildings (GB 55015-2021) issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. The designed orthogonal factor level table and orthogonal table are shown in Appendix A.

2.3. Simulation Tools and Conditions

DeST is an effective building energy simulation tool developed by Tsinghua University in 1989. From the development of the software to the present, it has been widely used in building thermal process calculation through many cases verifications [28].
In the process of using DeST simulation, with nine influencing factors as independent variables, with the building heating energy consumption and cooling energy consumption as dependent variables, through the orthogonal Appendix A design and orthogonal test. In the process of building simulation, other variables (such as heating temperature, cooling temperature, equipment power and lighting density of each room, etc.) are based on the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings (GB/T 51350-2019), the design standard for energy efficiency of residential buildings in severe cold and cold regions (JGJ 26-2018) and the general code for energy efficiency and renewable energy application in buildings (GB 55015-2021).

3. Results and Discussion

According to the tests arranged by orthogonal tables, 135 tests are required for typical buildings in 5 categories. Building energy consumption simulation software DeST was used for the test.

3.1. Analysis of Orthogonal Test Results

In order to analyze the order of influence of various factors on building energy consumption under the premise of building parameters stipulated in the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings, the extreme value (EV) analysis of test results are carried out. Extreme value represents the maximum difference between the mean values of each factor, which can reflect the influence of all factors affecting energy consumption on building energy consumption [29]. As the horizontal values of each parameter in the design of the orthogonal table are all taken within the scope of the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings (GB/T 51350-2019), the following analysis was carried out under the premise of the range of building parameters stipulated in the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings (GB/T 51350-2019).

3.1.1. Severe Cold Region A

As can be seen from Figure 1 and Figure 2, for region 1A, the factors influencing the cumulative annual heat load of buildings are BO, WWRS, KEW, KE, KR, KG, WWRN, VT, and WWEWE in descending order. Among them, BO has the strongest influence on the cumulative heat load, and the cumulative heat load decreases rapidly from 15° west of due north to 15° east of due north, VT has a weak influence on the cumulative indoor heat load throughout the year, and WWRS is negatively correlated with the heat load. The influence of other factors on the cumulative heat load increases with the increase of each parameter.
The factors influencing the annual cumulative cooling load of buildings in descending order are VT, WWEWE, KE, KR, KEW, KG, BO, WWRS, and WWRN, among which the VT has the greatest influence on the cumulative cooling load, and the cumulative cooling load decreases rapidly from two to five times per hour. The influence of KR, KE, KG, and BO on the cumulative cooling load decreases with the increase of each parameter. However, the influence of KEW, WWRN, WWRS, and WWEWE on the cumulative cooling load show an overall upward trend with the increase of each parameter. The factors influencing the annual cumulative load of buildings are BO, WWRS, KEW, KE, KR, VT, KG, WWEWE, and WWRN in descending order. The influence of each factor on the cumulative load is basically the same as that of each factor on the cumulative heat load. This is due to the fact that for region 1A, the cumulative heat load of buildings accounts for a large proportion of the cumulative load. In general, 1A region for severe cold region A, in the process of implementation nearly zero energy buildings, in addition to meet the requirements of almost the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings’ envelope structure, the effective method to reduce building energy consumption for building toward the 15° east of due north, low heat transfer coefficient of the transparent enclosure structure, a small south window wall ratio, and cooling during the summer to keep around 5 times per hour of ventilation.

3.1.2. Severe Cold Region B

As can be seen from Figure 3 and Figure 4, for region 1B, the factors influencing the cumulative annual heat load of buildings are BO, KEW, WWRS, KE, KR, KG, WWRN, WWEWE, and VT in descending order. Among them, as with region 1A, BO has the most obvious influence on cumulative heat load, and the cumulative heat load decreases rapidly in the range from 15° west of due north to 15° east of due north, VT has a weak influence on cumulative indoor heat load throughout the year, and WWRS is negatively correlated with heat load. The influence of other factors on the cumulative heat load increases with the increase of each parameter. The factors influencing the cumulative cooling load of buildings are VT, WWEWE, WWRS, WWRN, KG, BO, KE, KEW, and KR in descending order. VT has the greatest influence on the cumulative cooling load, and the cumulative cooling load decreases rapidly in the range from two times to eight times per hour. The influence of WWRN, WWRS and WWEWE on the cumulative cooling load shows an upward trend with the increase of each parameter.
The factors influencing the annual cumulative load of buildings in descending order are VT, BO, KEW, WWRN, KE, WWEWE, KR, WWRS, and KG. The influence of each factor on the cumulative load is basically the same as that of each factor on the cumulative heat load. This is due to the fact that for region 1B, the cumulative heat load of buildings accounts for a large proportion of the cumulative load. In general, region 1B is a severe cold region B. In the process of realizing the nearly zero energy building, in addition to meeting the requirements of almost the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings’ envelope structure, the effective methods to reduce the building energy consumption are a building orientation of about 15° east of due north, a low heat transfer coefficient of the transparent enclosure structure, and ventilation of about eight times per hour in summer when cooling.

3.1.3. Severe Cold Region C

As can be seen from Figure 5 and Figure 6, for region 1C, the factors influencing the cumulative annual heat load of buildings are WWRS, KEW, KG, KR, WWRN, BO, KE, VT, and WWEWE in descending order. KEW and WWRS have a strong influence on the cumulative heat load. The influence of KR, KE, KG, KEW, and WWRN on the cumulative heat load show a general upward trend with the increase of each parameter, while the influence of WWRS, WWEWE, BO, and VT on the cumulative heat load shows a general downward trend with the increase of each parameter.
The factors influencing the cumulative cooling load of buildings are VT, WWEWE, WWRS, KG, WWRN, BO, KEW, KE, and KR in descending order. Among them, VT has the strongest influence on the cumulative cooling load, and the cumulative cooling load decreases rapidly in the range from 2 times to 10 times per hour. The influence of WWRN, WWRS and WWEWE on the cumulative cooling load show an upward trend with the increase of each parameter. The factors influencing the annual cumulative load of buildings from large to small are VT, KEW, WWRN, KR, BO, KE, WWEWE, WWRS, and KG among which, the influence on VT cumulative load is the strongest. In general, region 1C is a severe cold region C. In the process of realizing a near-zero energy building, in addition to meet the requirements of almost the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings’ envelope structure, maintaining ventilation at about 10 times per hour during cooling in summer is the most effective method.

3.1.4. Cold Region A

As can be seen from Figure 7 and Figure 8, for region 2A, the factors influencing the cumulative annual heat load of buildings are BO, KEW, KR, WWRS, KE, KG, WWRN, VT, and WWEWE in descending order. Among them, building orientation has a strong influence on cumulative heat load. The influence of KR, KE, KG, KEW, WWRN, and VT on the cumulative heat load shows a general upward trend with the increase of each parameter, while the influence of WWRS, WWEWE, and BO on the cumulative heat load shows a general downward trend with the increase of each parameter.
The factors influencing the cumulative cooling load of buildings throughout the year are VT, WWEWE, WWRS, BO, WWRN, KEW, KE, KG, and KR in descending order. VT has the strongest influence on the cumulative cooling load, and the cumulative cooling load decreases rapidly in the range from 2 times to 12 times per hour. The influence of WWRS and WWEWE on the cumulative cooling load shows an increasing trend with the increase of each parameter. The factors influencing the annual cumulative load of buildings are VT, BO, WWEWE, KR, KEW, KE, WWRN, KG, and WWRS in descending order, among which, VT and BO have the strongest influence on the cumulative load. The influence of other factors on the load increases with the increase of each parameter.
In general, region 2A is a cold region A. In the process of realizing a near-zero energy building, in addition to meet the requirements of almost the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings’ envelope structure, it is necessary to maintain VT about 10 times per hour during cooling in summer and to have a small east-west window wall ratio (as well as a due south orientation).

3.1.5. Cold Region B

As can be seen from Figure 9 and Figure 10, for region 2B, the factors influencing the cumulative annual heat load of buildings are KEW, KR, BO, KG, WWRS, VT, KE, WWRN, and WWEWE in descending order. Among them, BO, KR, and KEW have strong influence on cumulative heat load. Except for WWRS, WWEWE, and BO, the influence of other factors on building energy consumption generally presents an upward trend.
The factors influencing the annual accumulative cooling load of buildings in descending order are VT, WWEWE, KG, WWRS, WWRN, BO, KR, KEW and KE, among which VT has the strongest influence on the accumulative cooling load. Different from the other four types of areas, VT ranges from one to five times per hour. The accumulative cooling load rises rapidly, since the outdoor air temperature and indoor air temperature in class 2B region are different from the other four regions. The factors influencing the annual cumulative load of buildings from large to small are VT, WWEWE, KEW, KR, BO, WWRN, KE, KG, and WWRS, among which VT has the strongest influence on the cumulative load. The influence of other factors on load shows a general upward trend with the increase of each parameter, while BO demonstrates the opposite trend. In general, region 2A is a cold region A. In the process of realizing the nearly zero energy building, in addition to meeting the requirements of almost the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings’ envelope structure, it is necessary to have a small east-west window-wall ratio, a building orientation about 15° west of due north, and a building ventilation kept as low as possible within the specified range.

3.2. Summary of Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption

For the annual cumulative heat load, KR, KE, KG, KOW, and WWRN in the five types of regions are positively correlated with the annual cumulative heat load, while WWRS and BO are negatively correlated with the annual cumulative heat load. In terms of WWEWE, the heat loads of 1B,1C,2A and 2B decreased with the increase of WWEWE, while the heat loads of 1A region decreased. In general, among many factors affect heat load; KEW, WWRS and BO are in the leading position, while WWEWE and VT are in the weakest position.
For the annual cumulative cooling load, KR, KE, KG, KEW, WWRN and BO have little influence on the annual cumulative cooling load of buildings, while WWRS, WWEWE, and VT have a great influence on the cooling load of buildings. Specifically, for the five types of regions, WWRS, WWEWE are positively correlated with the cooling load. For region 2B, VT is negatively correlated with cooling load, which is opposite to the other four areas.
For the annual accumulative load, KR, KE, KG, KEW, WWRN, and WWEWE are positively correlated with the annual accumulative load for the five types of regions. For the 1A,1B and 1C regions, WWEWE, BO and VT are negatively correlated with the annual cumulative load. For the class 2A area, with the increase of WWES, BO and VT, the cumulative load curve showed an inflection point and showed a downward trend. But for area 2B, the WWES curve shows an inflection point at 0.45, BO is negatively correlated with the annual cumulative load, and VT is positively correlated with the annual cumulative load in region 2B.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, based on the five types of reference buildings in the cold and arid regions of northwest China, through the method of orthogonal testing, in DeST energy consumption simulation software 5 types of regions, 3 levels, 9 factors, and a total of 135 kinds of building energy consumption calculation models were set up. Through the extreme value analysis of each type of building energy consumption simulation results, the following conclusions were obtained.
In the process of realizing nearly zero energy consumption for residential buildings in cold and arid areas of northwest China, the five types of residential buildings should reduce the roof heat transfer coefficient, the exterior wall heat transfer coefficient, the ground heat transfer coefficient, the exterior window heat transfer coefficient, the north window wall ratio, and the east west window wall ratio as much as possible within the scope prescribed by the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings. Class 1A,1B,1C regions should increase the east west window wall ratio and ventilation times, with building orientations of about 15° east of due north and ventilation of about 5, 8, 10 times per hour, respectively. The south window wall ratio, building orientation and ventilation times for class 2A regions should be set at 0.45, north-south, and about 10 per hour, respectively. For class 2B regions, the south window wall ratio should be set around 0.45, building orientation around 15° east of due north, and the ventilation times should be kept as low as possible within the limits specified by the technical standard for nearly zero energy buildings.
By studying the influencing factors of energy consumption of nearly zero energy buildings in Northwest China, this paper obtains the specific influencing ways of each factor on energy consumption. In future studies, researchers can expand the building area and study the influencing factors of energy consumption of nearly zero energy buildings in different areas and larger areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y. (Jieyuan Yang); methodology, R.Z.; software, H.Y.; validation, J.Y. (Jieyuan Yang) and H.Y.; formal analysis, J.Y. (Jingbo Yang); funding acquisition, J.Y. (Jieyuan Yang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Gansu Youth Science and Technology Fund Project (Research on the Influence mechanism of Indoor Temperature Field Change of Nearly zero Energy Buildings in Cold and Arid Areas, grant number 21JR1RA246), the Youth Science Foundation Project of Lanzhou Jiaotong University (Study on adaptability of nearly zero energy consumption buildings in northwest cold and arid regions, grant number 1200060916) and the Construction Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province (Exploration and Research on the Assembled Integrated Design of Traditional Brick and Wood Buildings in Linxia District, grant number JK2022-15).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thank the Gansu Youth Science and Technology Fund Project, the Youth Science Foundation Project of Lanzhou Jiaotong University and the Construction Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province for its support of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Table of orthogonal factor levels of residential buildings in severe cold regions.
Table A1. Table of orthogonal factor levels of residential buildings in severe cold regions.
LevelTest Factor
KRKEKGKEWWWRNWWRSWWEWEBOVT
1A1B1C
10.10.10.150.80.150.350.2015° east of due north222
20.1250.1250.250.90.200.400.25due north355
30.150.150.31.00.250.450.3015° west of due north5810
Table A2. Orthogonal test table of residential buildings in severe cold regions L27.
Table A2. Orthogonal test table of residential buildings in severe cold regions L27.
TestKRKEKGKEWWWRNWWRSWWEWEBOVT
1A1B1C
133113311222
222223121333
311333231111
412121333222
531231113333
611222321111
712313123222
831312323333
913131222333
1021213232222
1121321112222
1232133122111
1323233313111
1423122133111
1512232213222
1632322212111
1723311223111
1822331331333
1932211332111
2021132322222
2113212132333
2222112211333
2311111111111
2413323312333
2533221221222
2633332131222
2731123233333
Table A3. Table of orthogonal factor levels of residential buildings in cold regions.
Table A3. Table of orthogonal factor levels of residential buildings in cold regions.
LevelTest Factor
KRKEKGKEWWWRNWWRSWWEWEBOVT
1A1B
10.10.150.21.00.20.40.2515° east of due north21
20.150.1750.31.10.250.450.30due north102
30.20.20.41.20.30.50.3515°west of due north125
Table A4. Orthogonal test table of residential buildings in cold regions L27.
Table A4. Orthogonal test table of residential buildings in cold regions L27.
TestKRKEKGKEWWWRNWWRSWWEWEBOVT
2A2B
11132212122
23231122111
32232113233
42223211211
53121331222
62321133111
71322121233
82122322311
93222223122
103332311311
112113123322
121212333311
131313222211
143311213333
151123313133
162131221333
171233131322
181111111111
193112132233
201331323222
213213321133
222312231122
231221232333
243323112322
252333332133
263133233211
272211312222

References

  1. Mousavi, S.; Gijón-Rivera, M.; Rivera-Solorio, C.; Rangel, C.G. Energy, comfort, and environmental assessment of passive techniques integrated into low-energy residential buildings in semi-arid climate. Energy Build. 2022, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ismail, F.H.; Shahrestani, M.; Vahdati, M.; Boyd, P.; Donyavi, S. Climate change and the energy performance of buildings in the future—A case study for prefabricated buildings in the UK. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 39, 102285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Santamouris, M.; Vasilakopoulou, K. Present and Future Energy Consumption of Buildings: Challenges and Opportunities towards Decarbonisation. e-Prime 2021, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, L.; Sun, W.; Hu, W.; Sun, Y. Impact of natural and social environmental factors on building energy consumption: Based on bibliometrics. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 37, 102136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Deng, Q.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ma, L. A quantitative analysis of the impact of residential cluster layout on building heating energy consumption in cold IIB regions of China. Energy Build. 2021, 253, 111515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Zheng, X.; Yang, J.; Yoon, J.H. Impact of BIPV windows on building energy consumption in street canyons: Model development and validation. Energy Build. 2021, 249, 111207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Laskari, M.; de Masi, R.-F.; Karatasou, S.; Santamouris, M.; Assimakopoulos, M.-N. On the impact of user behaviour on heating energy consumption and indoor temperature in residential buildings. Energy Build. 2021, 255, 111657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Su, M.A.; Ngarambe, J.; Santamouris, M.; Yun, G.Y. Empirical evidence on the impact of urban overheating on building cooling and heating energy consumption. iScience 2021, 24, 102495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, Y.X.; Yu, C. Impact of meteorological factors on high-rise office building energy consumption in Hong Kong: From a spatiotemporal perspective. Energy Build. 2020, 228, 110468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qiao, R.; Liu, T. Impact of building greening on building energy consumption: A quantitative computational approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 246, 119020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Hu, W.; Sun, Y. Impacts of multiple factors on energy consumption of aging residential buildings based on a system dynamics model--Taking Northwest China as an example. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 102595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Harkouss, F.; Fardoun, F.; Biwole, P.H. Passive design optimization of low energy buildings in different climates. Energy 2018, 165, 591–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. De Masi, R.F.; Gigante, A.; Vanoli, G.P. Are nZEB design solutions environmental sustainable? Sensitive analysis for building envelope configurations and photovoltaic integration in different climates. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 39, 102292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rabani, M.; Madessa, H.B.; Nord, N. Achieving zero-energy building performance with thermal and visual comfort enhancement through optimization of fenestration, envelope, shading device, and energy supply system. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 2021, 44, 101020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pappaccogli, G.; Giovannini, L.; Zardi, D.; Martilli, A. Sensitivity analysis of urban microclimatic conditions and building energy consumption on urban parameters by means of idealized numerical simulations. Urban Clim. 2020, 34, 100677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, B.; Qi, L.; Yang, T. Simulation and Analysis of the Energy Consumption for Public Buildings in Different Climate Regions of China. Procedia Eng. 2017, 205, 2940–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, J.; Wu, J. Analysis on the Influence of Building Envelope to Public Buildings Energy Consumption Based on DeST Simulation. Procedia Eng. 2015, 121, 1620–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fadejev, J.; Simson, R.; Kurnitski, J.; Kesti, J.; Mononen, T.; Lautso, P. Geothermal Heat Pump Plant Performance in a Nearly Zero-energy Building. Energy Procedia 2016, 96, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Fu, Y.; Yang, X.; Xu, W. Assessment of mid-to-long term energy saving impacts of nearly zero energy building incentive policies in cold region of China. Energy Build. 2021, 241, 110938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, Y.; Zhong, S.; Yang, W.; Hao, X.; Li, C.-Q. Towards zero-energy buildings in China: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 123297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. D’Agostino, D.; Parker, D.; Epifani, I.; Crawley, D.; Lawrie, L. How will future climate impact the design and performance of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs)? Energy 2021, 240, 122479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferrara, M.; Vallée, J.C.; Shtrepi, L.; Astolfi, A.; Fabrizio, E. A thermal and acoustic co-simulation method for the multi-domain optimization of nearly zero energy buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Benzaama, M.; Menhoudj, S.; Lekhal, M.; Mokhtari, A.; Attia, S. Multi-objective optimisation of a seasonal solar thermal energy storage system combined with an earth—Air heat exchanger for net zero energy building. Sol. Energy 2021, 220, 901–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, B.; Rodriguez, D. Renewable energy systems optimization by a new multi-objective optimization technique: A residential building. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 35, 102094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huo, H.; Xu, W.; Li, A.; Lv, Y.; Liu, C. Analysis and optimization of external venetian blind shading for nearly zero-energy buildings in different climate regions of China. Sol. Energy 2021, 223, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, D.; Pan, W.Y.; Wang, P.; Yang, L.P.; Yang, Q.; Chao, J. Exploration of ecological rural residential building design in Yinchuan region. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Built Environment Science and Technology, Nanjing, China, 9–12 May 2010; pp. 979–986. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cao, Y.T. Scientific analysis of suitability of energy saving technologies in northwest of traditional dwellings. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Hou, C.; Hou, J.; Wei, D.; Hou, Y. Optimization analysis of thermal insulation layer attributes of building envelope exterior wall based on DeST and life cycle economic evaluation. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2019, 14, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, J. Research on Countermeasures and Methods of the design of Green Buildings in Humid and Hot Climate Zone. Ph.D. Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Extreme value of each factor(1A).
Figure 1. Extreme value of each factor(1A).
Sustainability 14 15721 g001
Figure 2. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (1A).
Figure 2. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (1A).
Sustainability 14 15721 g002
Figure 3. Extreme value of each factor (1B).
Figure 3. Extreme value of each factor (1B).
Sustainability 14 15721 g003
Figure 4. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (1B).
Figure 4. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (1B).
Sustainability 14 15721 g004
Figure 5. Extreme value of each factor (1C).
Figure 5. Extreme value of each factor (1C).
Sustainability 14 15721 g005
Figure 6. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (1C).
Figure 6. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (1C).
Sustainability 14 15721 g006
Figure 7. Extreme value of each factor (2A).
Figure 7. Extreme value of each factor (2A).
Sustainability 14 15721 g007
Figure 8. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (2A).
Figure 8. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (2A).
Sustainability 14 15721 g008
Figure 9. Extreme value of each factor (2B).
Figure 9. Extreme value of each factor (2B).
Sustainability 14 15721 g009
Figure 10. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (2B).
Figure 10. Influence trend of various factors on building energy consumption (2B).
Sustainability 14 15721 g010
Table 1. Typical architectural overview of five typical regions [26,27].
Table 1. Typical architectural overview of five typical regions [26,27].
Climatic RegionBuilding Height(m)Energy Supply area(m2)Area of Air ConditioningBuilding Layout
1A456.42bedroom1
bedroom2
bedroom3
living room
Sustainability 14 15721 i001
1B3.579.80bedroom1
bedroom2
living room
Sustainability 14 15721 i002
1C364.20bedroom1
bedroom2
living room
Sustainability 14 15721 i003
2A3.655.87bedroom1
bedroom2
living room
Sustainability 14 15721 i004
2B3.4107.8bedroom1
bedroom2
living room
Sustainability 14 15721 i005
Table 2. Structure of exterior wall, roof, and floor.
Table 2. Structure of exterior wall, roof, and floor.
Construction SiteStructure
wall Sustainability 14 15721 i006
roof Sustainability 14 15721 i007
floor Sustainability 14 15721 i008
Table 3. Heat transfer coefficient parameters of nearly zero energy consumption residential buildings in China.
Table 3. Heat transfer coefficient parameters of nearly zero energy consumption residential buildings in China.
Part of the Envelope StructureK(W/(m2·K))
Severe Cold RegionCold Region
Roof0.1–0.150.1–0.2
Exterior Wall0.1–0.150.15–0.2
Ground and Exterior Slab0.15–0.30.2–0.4
Exterior Window≤1.0≤1.2
SHGCWinter≥0.45≥0.45
Summer≤0.3≤0.3
Table 4. Window-wall ratio parameters of nearly zero energy consumption residential buildings in China.
Table 4. Window-wall ratio parameters of nearly zero energy consumption residential buildings in China.
The Window TowardsSevere Cold RegionCold Region
North≤0.25≤0.30
West, East≤0.30≤0.35
South≤0.45≤0.50
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Yuan, H.; Yang, J.; Zhu, R. Study on the Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption of Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings in Cold and Arid Regions of Northwest China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315721

AMA Style

Yang J, Yuan H, Yang J, Zhu R. Study on the Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption of Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings in Cold and Arid Regions of Northwest China. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):15721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jieyuan, Hao Yuan, Jingbo Yang, and Ruilin Zhu. 2022. "Study on the Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption of Nearly Zero Energy Residential Buildings in Cold and Arid Regions of Northwest China" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 15721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315721

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop